throbber
Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on August 15, 2018 by guest
`
`APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, July 1979, p. 24-28
`0099-2240/79/07-0024/05$02.00/0
`
`Vol. 38, No. 1
`
`Toxic Effects of Some Alcohol and Ethylene Glycol
`Derivatives on Cladosporium resinae
`K. H. LEE* AND H. A. WONG
`Department of Biochemistry, University of Singapore, Singapore 3
`
`Received for publication 20 April 1979
`
`Eleven commercially available alcohol and ethylene glycol derivatives were
`tested for their toxicity toward a problem organism in jet fuel, Cladosporium
`resinae. In the presence of glucose, 20% (vol/vol) ethylene glycol monomethyl
`ether prevented spore germination and mycelial growth, and 10% (vol/vol) 2-
`ethoxybutanol, 10% 2-isopropoxyethanol, 10% 3-methoxybutanol, 5% 2-butyloxy-
`ethanol, 5% ethylene glycol dibutyl ether, and 5% diethylene glycol monobutyl
`ether were found to have similar effects. In a biphasic kerosene-water system, 3-
`methoxybutanol, 2-butyloxyethanol, and diethylene glycol monobutyl ether were
`again found to be more toxic than ethylene glycol monomethyl ether. Consider-
`able potassium efflux, protein leakage, and inhibition of endogenous respiration
`were observed in the presence of the more toxic compounds. 2-Butyloxyethanol
`also caused loss of sterols from cells.
`
`Microbiological contamination of jet aircraft
`fuel systems has been a major concern of airline
`operators, particularly in the tropics. The micro-
`organisms usually form a thick slimy sludge
`which is fily attached to the floor and sides of
`the integral fuel tanks whenever moisture is
`present to produce a fuel-water interface. The
`filamentous fungus Cladosporium resinae has
`been shown to be the predominent species pres-
`ent in the biological sludge (3, 4, 10) and is
`mainly responsible for the extensive corrosion
`frequently found in fuel tanks of both commer-
`cial and military jet aircraft (9).
`Previous work from this laboratory has shown
`that C. resinae can utilize C9 to C18 n-alkanes
`for growth, whereas the shorter-chain n-alkanes,
`particularly n-hexane and n-heptane, do not
`support growth of this organism and inhibit its
`growth on glucose (14). Similar effects were also
`observed when shorter-chain fatty acids and al-
`cohols (C6 to C12) were incubated with C. resinae
`monomethyl
`Ethylene
`glycol
`ether
`(13).
`(EGME), a short-chain glycol used primarily as
`an anti-icing additive in military jet aircraft, has
`been found to be toxic to C. resinae (5-7). The
`present paper reports work done on the action
`of some derivatives of ethylene glycol and other
`alcohols on C. resinae.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Test organisms and conditions. Isolate 35A, iso-
`lated from Australian soil and identified as C. resinae
`forma avellaneum by D. G. Parbery, School of Agri-
`culture, University of Melbourne, was used in all ex-
`periments unless otherwise stated. The cultures were
`
`maintained on Bushnell-Haas glucose agar slants (2).
`Strains ATCC 22711 and ATCC 22712 were obtained
`from J. J. Cooney, Department of Biology, University
`of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio.
`All liquid culture experiments were carried out in
`triplicate in standard 250-nil Erlenmeyer flasks. For
`the preparation of liquid inoculum, the organism was
`grown on Bushnell-Haas glucose agar slants (2) for 1
`to 2 weeks at 30°C. A spore suspension practically free
`of mycelium as observed under a microscope was
`obtained by gently shaking the spores off an agar slant
`with 10 to 15 ml of sterile distilled water or basal salts
`medium. For each experiment, samples of the spore
`suspension were counted with a hemacytometer and
`diluted to give a concentration of 6 x 107 spores per
`ml. A known volume of the continuously agitated
`spore suspension was then pipetted into each flask.
`Chemicals. The ethylene glycol derivatives and
`other alcohols were obtained from Fluka, Basel, Swit-
`zerland, and E. Merck AG, Darmstadt, West Germany.
`Commercial jet fuel (Jet A-1) was kindly supplied by
`Shell Co., Singapore. D-[U-14C]glucose was purchased
`from Radiochemical Centre, Amersham, England. All
`other compounds were analytical grade or the best
`grade available and were from Merck or Sigma Chem-
`ical Co., St. Louis, Mo.
`Abbreviations. The names of the various com-
`pounds are abbreviated as follows: ethylene glycol
`monomethyl ether or 2-methoxyethanol, EGME; 2-
`ethoxyethanol, 2-EE; 2-isopropoxyethanol, 2-IE; 3-
`methoxy-l-butanol, 3-MB; 1-methoxy-2-propanol, 1-
`MP; 2-butyloxyethanol, 2-BE; diethylene glycol mon-
`omethyl ether, DEGMME; diethylene glycol dimethyl
`ether, DEGDME; diethylene glycol monoethyl ether,
`DEGMEE; diethylene glycol diethyl ether, DEGDEE;
`diethylene glycol monobutyl ether, DEGMBE; and
`ethylene glycol dibutyl ether, EGDBE.
`Effect of compounds on spore germination and
`mycelial growth of C. re8inae in glucose medium.
`
`24
`
`Page 1
`
`Anacor Exhibit 2040
`Flatwing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`IPR2018-00170
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on August 15, 2018 by guest
`
`VOL. 38, 1979
`
`EFFECTS OF ETHYLENE GLYCOLS ON C. RESINAE
`
`25
`
`A 0.5-ml amount of the spore suspension in water was
`added to 40 ml of a mixture of Bushnell-Haas mineral
`salts medium containing 1% glucose and appropriate
`volumes of the substances being tested. The final
`concentrations of each of the substances tested ranged
`from 1 to 20% (vol/vol). The flasks were incubated
`statically at 300C for 21 days. To test for effects on
`spore germination, flasks containing 40 ml of mineral
`salts medium with 1% glucose and a test compound
`were inoculated with 0.5 ml of spore suspension. Ger-
`mination was considered inhibited if white mycelial
`colonies were not observed after 21 days of incubation
`at 300C. To test for inhibitory effect on mycelial
`growth, 1-ml samples of the filter-sterilized test com-
`pounds were added aseptically to flasks containing
`mineral salts medium, 1% glucose, and germinating
`spores in the form of tiny white mycelial colonies.
`Incubation was carried out at 300C, and evidence for
`increase in mycelial mass was observed for 20 days.
`Flasks were incubated for an additional 21 days if no
`growth was observed.
`Effects of compounds on C. resinae in a bi-
`phasic system containing Jet A-1 fuel and min-
`eral salts solution. The ratio of fuel to water found
`in the fuel tanks of airplanes is usually between 1,000:
`5 and 1,000:1. The experiments were therefore carried
`out using one of these ratios. A 0.1-ml amount of a
`spore suspension in Bushnell-Haas salts medium was
`added to 100 ml of Jet A-1 fuel in a 250-ml Erlenmeyer
`flask. The test substance was added so that its final
`concentration ranged from 0.05 to 0.2% (vol/vol) with
`respect to the fuel.
`Effect of antifungal compounds on potassium
`efflux and protein leakage. The procedure for these
`experiments has been reported previously (15). Potas-
`sium was analyzed by flame photometry, and protein
`was analyzed by the method of Lowry et al. (8).
`Extraction of sterols by the test compounds. A
`cell suspension in mineral salts medium (4 ml, 1 to 2
`mg of cells per ml) was gently shaken with 1 ml of test
`compound at 30°C for 5 h in a 25-ml flask. Also, cells
`were incubated without the addition of any test com-
`pound. At the end of the incubation period, the cells
`were harvested by vacuum filtration over preweighed
`Whatman glass fiber filter paper. The filtrate was
`shaken vigorously with 5 ml of chloroform-methanol
`(2:1, vol/vol) in a 50-ml screw-capped tube for 15 min
`at room temperature. The organic phase was sepa-
`rated, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and analyzed for
`sterols by the colorimetric method of Searcy and
`Bergquist (12). The reagent volumes were reduced
`proportionately to enable the assay of 10 to 50 jig of
`sterols. Ergosterol was used as the standard.
`Glucose uptake. Glucose uptake in the presence
`and absence of the test compounds was measured by
`a [14C]glucose uptake method described previously
`(15). The final concentration of the antifungal com-
`pounds tested was from 1 to 5% (vol/vol).
`Endogenous respiration. Cells were initially
`grown in Bushnell-Haas medium containing 1% glu-
`cose in 1-liter Fernbach flasks for 3 to 7 days. Har-
`vested cells were washed free of glucose and resus-
`pended in the salts medium to give a cell concentration
`of 5 to 10 mg (dry weight) per ml. A 50-ml sample of
`the cell suspension was incubated with 1 ml of D-
`
`['4C]glucose solution (5 ,uCi/ml, 0.125 ACi/lumol) at
`300C for 2 h. The labeled cells were harvested, washed
`thoroughly with distilled water (three times, 50 ml
`each) by vacuum filtration on Whatman glass fiber
`filter paper, and finally resuspended in the mineral
`salts medium to give a cell concentration of 2 to 3 mg
`(dry weight) per ml. Production of I'CO2 from the
`washed labeled cells was measured in the presence
`and absence of the various compounds. A 3-ml amount
`of the cell suspension was placed in a screw-capped
`bottle (30-ml capacity) equipped with a rubber seal
`through which materials could be injected into the
`bottle. A scintillation vial, which contained 1 ml of
`'4CO2-trapping agent (16) and was tightly capped with
`a rubber stopper, was connected to the cell chamber
`by a length of polythene tubing. At zero time, 1 ml of
`20% (vol/vol) test compound was injected into the cell
`chamber. After a 2-h incubation at 300C in a shaker
`bath, 1 ml of 40% trichloroacetic acid was injected into
`the cell suspension to stop the reaction. About 100 ml
`of nitrogen gas was pumped into the cell chamber to
`drive the gas produced by the cells into the vial. After
`standing for 4 h or longer in the shaker bath, the vial
`was removed, and 10 ml of scintillation fluid [4 g of
`2,5-diphenyloxazole and 0.2 g of 1,4-bis-2-(5-phenyl-
`oxazolyl)benzene in 1 liter of toluene] was added to it.
`Radioactivity was measured in a Packard Tri-Carb
`liquid scintillation spectrometer.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`The two most common biocides currently
`being used in jet aircraft are Biobor JF (a prod-
`uct of U.S. Borax and Chemical Corp.) and
`EGME. Both are commercially available. The
`former is a mixture of two boron compounds,
`2,2-oxybis-(4,4,6-trimethyl- 1,3,2-dioxaborinane)
`2,2-(1-methyltrimethylenedioxyl)-bis-(4-
`and
`methyl-1,3,2-dioxaborinane). It has been ob-
`served that Biobor JF at the recommended con-
`centration of 270 ul/liter of fuel gives rise to a
`deposit of boric acid after standing for some
`length of time, both in the laboratory and in fuel
`tanks (unpublished data). The effectiveness of
`EGME, an anti-icing agent, as a biocide is still
`doubtful, as shown by the occasional isolation of
`C. resinae from storage tanks containing fuel
`treated with 0.05 to 0.15% (vol/vol) EGME (7,
`11).
`Eleven commercially available aliphatic alco-
`hols, mostly related to EGME, were tested for
`antifungal activity in the present study. The
`effects of these compounds on the growth of C.
`resinae 35A in 1% glucose-mineral salts medium
`are shown in Table 1. The toxicities of all the
`compounds tested were at least comparable to
`that of EGME. 2-EE, 2-IE, 3-MB, 2-BE, DEG-
`DEE, and DEGMBE were more toxic than
`EGME; 20% EGME prevented spore germina-
`tion and mycelial growth, whereas 10% 2-EE,
`10% 2-IE, 10% 3-MB, 5% 2-BE, 5% DEGMBE,
`and 5% EGDBE were found to have a similar
`
`Page 2
`
`Anacor Exhibit 2040
`Flatwing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`IPR2018-00170
`
`

`

`26
`
`Compound
`
`APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
`
`Mycelial growth at the following concn:
`
`LEE AND WONG
`TABLE 1. Growth of C. resinae 35A in 1% glucose-mineral salts medium in the presence of various
`compoundsa
`Spore gerni-nation and mycelial growth at the
`following concn:
`10%
`5%
`1%
`EGME
`+
`+++
`++++
`2-EE
`-
`+
`+++
`2-IE
`-
`+
`+++
`3-MB
`-
`+
`+++
`++++
`1-MP
`+++
`+
`++++
`2-BE
`+++
`+++
`-
`-
`-
`+
`DEGDME
`+++
`++++
`-
`+
`+++
`++++
`DEGDEE
`++
`+
`-
`+
`+++
`+++
`+++
`-
`+++
`-
`+
`DEGMME
`++++
`-
`+
`++++
`+++
`+
`+++
`-
`DEGMEE
`++++
`-
`+
`++++
`+++
`-
`-
`+++-
`-
`-
`DEGMBE
`-
`+++
`EGDBE
`+++-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`+++
`-
`a ++++ Growth of C. resinae in controls without inhibitors; +++, ++, and + refer to the degree of growth
`relative to that of the controls. -, No visible growth after 42 days of incubation at 30°C.
`
`1%
`++++
`
`20%
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`
`-
`
`5%
`+++
`+
`+
`+
`+++
`
`10%
`+
`-
`-
`-
`+
`
`20%
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on August 15, 2018 by guest
`
`TABLE 2. Growth of C. resinae 35A in a static two-
`phase fuel-water (1,000:1) system containing various
`compoundsa
`Spore germination and mycelial
`growth after 30 days with the
`following concn (% of total vol):
`
`Compound
`
`0.2
`0.1
`0.05
`EGME
`+
`+++
`-
`-
`2-EE
`+++
`+
`-
`2-IE
`+
`+++
`-
`-
`3-MB
`++
`-
`-
`2-BE
`++
`-
`DEGDEE
`+
`++
`-
`-
`DEGMBE
`++
`-
`-
`EGDBE
`++
`a ++++, Growth of C. resinae in controls without
`inhibitors; +++, ++, and + refer to the degree of
`growth relative to that in the controls.
`
`effect. Similarly, the potencies of these six com-
`pounds, when evaluated under simulated field
`conditions by observing the growth of C. resinae
`35A in static two-phase fuel-water systems
`(1,000:1), were greater than that of EGME (Ta-
`ble 2). No growth was observed when EGME
`was used at 0.2%, whereas 3-MB, 2-BE, and
`DEGMBE were effective in controlling the
`growth of the fungus at 0.1%.
`Figures 1 and 2 show the uptake of D-[ U-
`"4C]glucose in the presence of various concentra-
`tions of the compounds tested. At a final con-
`centration of 1% 2-BE, glucose uptake was only
`25% that of the controls. For DEGMBE, the
`inhibition was about 25% at a 1% concentration
`and 40% at a 3% concentration. With 3% (final
`concentration) 2-BE and EGDBE glucose up-
`take by the cells was almost completely in-
`
`hibited. EGME at a 5% concentration, on the
`other hand, did not inhibit glucose uptake at all.
`The question as to the cause of the antifungal
`activity of these alcohol derivatives led to an
`investigation of their effects on the fungal cell
`membrane by studying potassium loss from the
`cell. It was found that 2-BE at a 20% concentra-
`tion caused almost complete loss of cellular po-
`tassium, whereas at the same concentration
`EGME resulted in the efflux of only 27% of the
`potassium. In fact, EGME, when compared with
`the other alcohols tested, caused the least
`amount of potassium efflux (Table 3). A greater
`loss of cellular soluble protein was also observed
`in the presence of alcohols other than EGME
`(Table 4). Thus, it appears that one of the effects
`of these alcohols is on the membrane of C.
`resinae since the amount of potassium efflux
`and loss of cellular soluble proteins would reflect
`in some measure the degree of damage to mem-
`brane function. EGME is therefore the least
`toxic of all of the compounds tested.
`The probable mechanism of action of these
`alcohols on cell membranes was then investi-
`gated by testing the incubating medium for the
`presence of membrane components, such as ste-
`rols. Except for 2-BE, no sterols were found in
`the medium after the cells were incubated with
`the alcohol derivatives at 20% (vol/vol) concen-
`trations for 5 h. About 6.0 ,ug of sterol (as ergo-
`sterol) per mg of cell dry weight was released by
`20% 2-BE. Thus, 2-BE appears to cause damage
`to the cell membrane by removing some of the
`integral components of the membrane. Thus,
`the effect of the other antifungal ethylene glycol
`derivatives on the membrane was probably to
`cause a disarrangement of membrane structure
`
`Page 3
`
`Anacor Exhibit 2040
`Flatwing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`IPR2018-00170
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on August 15, 2018 by guest
`
`VOL. 38, 1979
`
`EFFECTS OF ETHYLENE GLYCOLS ON C. RESINAE
`
`27
`
`Substance (20% final concn)
`
`TABLE 3. Effect of antifungal substances on
`potassium efflux of C. resinae 35A at 30°C
`K+ loss after a 5-h
`incubation (% of to-
`tal cellular K+)
`0.95
`27.33
`91.00
`58.20
`58.20
`45.79
`56.68
`
`None (control)
`EGME
`2-BE
`DEGDEE
`DEGMBE
`EGDBE
`3-MB
`
`Substance
`(20% final concn)
`
`TABLE 4. Effect of antifungal substances on protein
`leakage of C. resinae 35A at 30°C
`Protein leakage after
`a 5-h incubation (%
`of total soluble pro-
`tein)
`2.26
`8.51
`25.27
`25.75
`34.80
`28.60
`25.22
`
`None (control)
`EGME
`2-BE
`DEGDEE
`DEGMBE
`EGDBE
`3-MB
`
`a
`
`s 1w
`IL
`
`/
`
`TOE h mn.
`FIG. 1. Effect of test compounds on the uptake of
`D-f'4C]glucose. Values are expressed as counts per
`minute per milligram (dry weight) of cells. A 1% final
`concentration of each was used. Symbols: 0, control;
`*,2-BE; A, DEGMBE.
`
`200
`
`A.
`
`4-,
`
`l 2
`
`3
`
`7
`
`FIG. 2. Effect of test compounds on the uptake of
`D-['4Cjglucose. Values are expressed as counts per
`minute per milligram (dry weight) of cells. A 5% final
`concentration was used for EGME, and a 3,o' final
`concentration was used for the other compounds.
`Symbols: O, control; O, EGME; A, DEGMBE; *, 2-
`BE; V7, EGDBE.
`without causing the disintegration of the com-
`ponents of the membrane. This disorganization
`could therefore have resulted in the inhibition
`of the uptake of substrates, such as glucose.
`Furthermore, the endogenous respiration of
`
`TABLE 5. Effect of compounds on the endogenous
`respiration of three C. resinae strainsa
`Endogenous respiration (% of con-
`trols) in:
`ATCC
`22711
`
`35A
`
`ATCC
`22712
`
`Compound (5% final
`concn)
`
`EGME
`98
`97
`99
`2-BE
`30
`50
`53
`DEGMBE
`40
`59
`55
`DEGDEE
`50
`52
`54
`a Rate of 14C02 expiration was measured as counts
`per minute per milligram of cell dry weight after a 2-h
`incubation at 30°C.
`
`C. resinae was inhibited by some of these com-
`pounds (Table 5). In the three strains studied,
`the degree of inhibition ranged from 51% in the
`presence of DEGMBE for ATCC 22711 to 70%
`in the presence of 2-BE for isolate 35A. No
`inhibition was observed with the same concen-
`tration of EGME. The reason for the differences
`in the sensitivities to these alcohols observed
`among the different strains of C. resinae is not
`known. The action of these compounds in in-
`hibiting endogenous respiration might be attrib-
`uted to their effect on the intracellular mem-
`brane or their nonspecific blocking of enzymic
`sites or both (1).
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of
`Science and Technology, Republic of Singapore.
`
`Page 4
`
`Anacor Exhibit 2040
`Flatwing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`IPR2018-00170
`
`

`

`Downloaded from
`
`http://aem.asm.org/
`
` on August 15, 2018 by guest
`
`28
`
`LEE AND WONG
`
`APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL.
`
`We thank Boon Kheng Tan for excellent technical assist-
`ance.
`
`LITERATURE CITED
`1. Bell, G. H. 1971. The action of monocarboxylic acids on
`Candida tropicalis growing on hydrocarbon substrates.
`Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J. Microbiol. Serol. 37:385-
`400.
`2. Bushnell, L. D., and H. F. Haas. 1941. The utilization of
`certain hydrocarbons by microorganisms. J. Bacteriol.
`41:653-673.
`3. Edmonds, P., and J. J. Cooney. 1967. Identification of
`microorganisms isolated from jet fuel systems. Appl.
`Microbiol. 15:411-416.
`4. Hendey, N. I. 1964. Some observations on Cladosporium
`resinae as a fuel contaminant and its possible role in
`the corrosion of aluminum alloy fuel tanks. Trans. Br.
`Mycol. Soc. 47:467-475.
`5. Hendey, N. I., V. J. Bagdon, G. E. Ernst, D. E.
`Klemme, and J. M. Leonard. 1971. Biocidal proper-
`ties of an anti-icing additive. NRL Report no. 7337.
`Department of the Navy, Washington, D.C.
`6. Hitzman, D. 0. 1964. The control of bacterial and fungal
`growth in jet fuels by use of a fuel additive. Dev. Ind.
`Microbiol. 6:105-116.
`7. London, S. A., V. H. Finefrock, and L. N. Killian.
`
`1964. Microbial activity in air force jet fuel systems.
`Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 6:61-79.
`8. Lowry, O. H., N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, and R. J.
`Randall. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin
`phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193:265-275.
`9. Parberry, D. G. 1971. Biological problems in jet aviation
`fuel and the biology of Amorphotheca resinae. Mater.
`Org. 3:161-208.
`10. Prince, A. E. 1961. Microbiological sludge in jet aircraft
`fuel. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 2:197-203.
`11. Rogers, M. R., and A. M. Kaplan. 1965. A survey of
`microbiological contamination in a military fuel distri-
`bution system. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 6:80-94.
`12. Searcy, R. L., and L. M. Bergquist. 1960. A new colour
`reaction for the quantitation of serum cholesterol. Clin.
`Chim. Acta 5:192-199.
`13. Teh, J. S. 1974. Toxicity of short-chain fatty acids and
`alcohols towards Cladosporium resinae. Appl. Micro-
`biol. 28:840-844.
`14. Teh, J. S., and K. H. Lee. 1973. Utilization of n-alkanes
`by Cladosporium resinae. Appl. Microbiol. 25:454-457.
`15. Teh, J. S., and K. H. Lee. 1974. Effects of n-alkanes on
`Cladosporium resinae. Can. J. Microbiol. 20:971-976.
`16. Woeller, F. H. 1961. Liquid scintillation counting of 14CO2
`with phenethylamine. Anal. Biochem. 2:508-511.
`
`Page 5
`
`Anacor Exhibit 2040
`Flatwing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc
`IPR2018-00170
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket