throbber
JPP 2009, 61: 431–437
`ß 2009 The Authors
`Received August 16, 2008
`Accepted January 7, 2009
`DOI 10.1211/jpp/61.04.0003
`ISSN 0022-3573
`
`Correspondence: Dr S. Narasimha
`Murthy, 113, Faser Hall,
`Department of Pharmaceutics,
`The University of Mississippi,
`University, MS 38677, USA.
`E-mail: murthy@olemiss.edu
`
`Research Paper
`
`A study on the effect of inorganic salts in transungual
`drug delivery of terbinafine
`
`Anroop B. Nair, Srinivasa M. Sammeta, Siva Ram K. Vaka and
`S. Narasimha Murthy
`
`Department of Pharmaceutics, The University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA
`
`Abstract
`
`Objectives The poor success rate of topical therapy in nail disorders is mainly because of
`the low permeability of keratinized nail plates. This can be overcome by utilizing potent
`perungual drug penetration enhancers that facilitate the drug permeation across the nail
`plate. This study evaluated the efficacy of inorganic salts in enhancing the trans-nail
`permeation using a model potent antifungal agent, terbinafine hydrochloride.
`Methods Permeation studies were carried out across human cadaver nail in a Franz
`diffusion cell using terbinafine solution (1 mg/ml; pH 3). Preliminary studies were carried
`out to assess the effect of salts (0.5 M) on the terbinafine permeation into and through the
`nail. Further, the influence of salt concentration (0.25–3 M) on permeation, the mechanism
`for the enhancement and the suitability of developing a formulation were also studied.
`Key findings Terbinafine permeation (3–5 fold) through the nail and drug load (4–7 fold)
`in the nail were enhanced significantly when salts were used at 0.5 M concentration.
`Increase in salt concentration up to 1 M increased the permeation, which decreased with
`the
`further increase in salt concentration (>1 M). Mechanistic studies revealed that
`enhanced permeation by salts was mainly due to their ability to increase the nail hydration
`and also to increase the thermodynamic activity of the drug. The cumulative amount of
`(9.70 ± 0.93 mg/cm2) was
`terbinafine permeated at 24 h from the formulated gel
`comparable with that of a solution (11.45 ± 1.62 mg/cm2).
`Conclusions Given the promising results from the permeation and drug load studies, it was
`concluded that inorganic salts could be used as potent transungual permeation enhancers.
`Keywords hydration; nail; permeation enhancer; salts; terbinafine
`
`Introduction
`
`infections and psoriasis.
`The most common causes of nail diseases are fungal
`Onychomycosis, fungal infection of the nail, is the most prevalent (approximately 50%) of
`all nail diseases. Dermatophytes are the main causative organism for onychomycosis, while
`non-dermatophytic molds and yeasts are also involved.[1] Existing treatment modalities for
`onychomycosis include oral delivery and topical application. Topical drug delivery is the
`most appropriate therapy as it offers higher patient compliance and better proximity to the
`infected site and avoids potential systemic adverse effects.[2,3] Currently, topical formulations
`are available as nail lacquers, creams, ointments, gels, solutions and lotions.[4] However, the
`efficiency of these formulations is limited due to their inability to deliver a therapeutically
`effective amount of drug into and across the impermeable nail plate. Therefore, this therapy
`is limited for the treatment of superficial and minor subungual onychomycosis.[5,6]
`Topical delivery of drugs by the usage of permeation enhancers is well known. A wide
`variety of proven permeation enhancers are available and are used in enhancing drug delivery
`across the skin. The skin contains about 15% of lipids arranged as lamellae in the
`intercellular space. Most skin penetration enhancers act by modulation of lipid structures.
`The nail plate has less lipid content (<1%) than the skin.[7] The major component of the nail
`plate is keratin. Enhancers of skin drug penetration that act predominantly on the
`keratinocyte pathway are relatively few, thus it is obvious that most skin permeation
`enhancers are unsuccessful in transungual drug delivery. Therefore, research is being carried
`out to screen novel entities for their potential transungual permeation enhancement ability.
`Many chemical agents, such as acetylcysteine, urea, salicylic acid, 2-n-nonyl-1,3-dioxalone,
`
`431
`
`

`

`432
`
`Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 2009; 61: 431–437
`
`mercaptoethanol, thioglycolic acid and glycolic acid, have
`been screened for their ungual permeation enhancement
`capacity.[8–12] Reports on the capability of these agents to
`enhance transungual delivery are inconsistent.[2] Recently
`Malhotra and Zatz[10] reported the ineffectiveness of kerato-
`lytic agents, even at high concentration, when delivered from
`gel formulation. The authors also observed the failure of
`sodium metabisulfite to enhance penetration. Also,
`the
`efficiency of acetylcysteine was limited only on the dorsal
`nail layer and it was inactive in the intermediate and lower
`nail layers.[8]
`It is well known that the cure rates with existing topical
`therapy remain much lower than those achieved by systemic
`antifungal therapy. Successful treatment of nail diseases by the
`topical route can be achieved by identifying potent perungual
`penetration enhancers to deliver drugs across the nail plate in
`effective amounts. It is also known that the efficiency of
`penetration enhancers vary with different formulation condi-
`tions and with different drugs. Therefore, one needs to identify
`the most appropriate enhancers for the given drug and
`formulation. In this direction, we developed a high-throughput
`technique for screening penetration enhancers, called Trans-
`Screen-N. It is a rapid microwell plate-based method that
`involves two different treatment procedures – simultaneous
`exposure treatment and sequential exposure treatment. The
`technique was developed to screen permeation enhancers for
`the delivery of terbinafine hydrochloride, a potent antifungal
`agent, which is the current treatment of choice in onychomy-
`cosis. During this process the efficiency of inorganic salts to act
`as perungual permeation enhancers was discovered. The drug
`load in nail pieces soaked in formulations containing salts as
`enhancers (sodium sulfite, sodium phosphate, potassium
`phosphate, calcium phosphate and ammonium carbonate)
`were found to be significantly higher than the control.
`TransScreen-N is a screening method only and the results are
`suggestive. The method does not reveal the drug permeation
`profile, flux, lag time or the possible mechanisms. Encouraged
`by results that suggested the potential permeation enhancement
`efficiency of salts in TransScreen-N, further research on this
`phenomenon was undertaken. The objective of this study was to
`evaluate the efficacy of inorganic salts in enhancing the
`transungual delivery of terbinafine hydrochloride.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Materials
`Terbinafine hydrochloride was procured from Uquifa
`(Jiutepec, Mexico). Sodium sulfite, sodium phosphate
`monobasic, potassium phosphate monobasic, calcium phos-
`phate monobasic and ammonium carbonate were purchased
`from Sigma (MO, US). Human cadaver nails (second, third
`and fourth finger nails), both male and female with varying
`thickness (0.4–0.7 mm), were procured from Science Care
`(AZ, US) and were stored at 4∞C and used within a week. All
`solutions were prepared in de-ionized water.
`
`Analytical method
`The amount of terbinafine in the samples was quantified by
`high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system
`
`(Waters 1525) with an autosampler (Waters, 717 plus)
`consisting of a Phenomenex C18 (2) 100 R analytical column
`(4.6 ¥ 150 mm; Luna 5.0 mm) and a variable wavelength dual l
`absorbance detector (Waters 2487). The mobile phase consisted
`of aqueous solution (0.096 M triethyl amine, 0.183 M orthopho-
`sphoric acid) and acetonitrile (60 : 40) adjusted to pH 2 with
`orthophosphoric acid. Elution was performed isocratically at
`32∞C at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The injection volume
`was 20 ml and the column effluent was monitored at 224 nm.
`The method was validated by determination of linearity,
`precision and accuracy. The range for the calibration curve was
`2–1000 ng/ml (R2 = 0.99). The coefficient of variation and the
`accuracy (relative mean error) was in the range of 1.03–6.08%
`and -0.54 to -6.96%, respectively.
`
`Preliminary in-vitro permeation studies
`Nails were cleaned and adherent tissue was removed with a
`pair of scissors and scalpel and the nail was rinsed in water.
`Each of the nail plates was soaked in water for 1 h and
`mounted on a nail adapter (PermeGear, PA, US). The whole
`assembly was sandwiched between the two chambers of a
`Franz diffusion cell
`(Logan Instruments Ltd, NJ, US).
`Terbinafine hydrochloride solution (500 ml, 1 mg/ml with
`0.5 M enhancer) was placed in the donor compartment and
`the receiver chamber was filled with 5 ml of acidified water
`(adjusted to pH 3 using 0.1 M hydrochloric acid or sodium
`hydroxide as the initial study data revealed that an ionic
`strength within 0.15 M does not affect the drug load and
`permeation). The enhancers used were ammonium carbonate,
`calcium phosphate, potassium phosphate, sodium phosphate
`and sodium sulfite. The active permeation area was 0.2 cm2.
`The solution in the receiver compartment was stirred at
`600 rev/min with a 3-mm magnetic stir bar. Samples were
`withdrawn at regular intervals for a period of 24 h from
`the receiver compartment and analysed. Similarly, control
`experiments (formulation with drug and no enhancer) were
`run in parallel for comparison.
`
`Amount of drug in nail
`The amount of terbinafine loaded in the nail was determined
`after the permeation study (24 h). Briefly, after in-vitro
`diffusion studies the nail plates were washed by a
`standardized procedure using water and 95% ethanol, until
`the surface was free from drug. The active diffusion area was
`cut into small pieces, weighed and placed in screw-cap pyrex
`vials. Sodium hydroxide (1.5 ml of 1 M) was added and the
`vials were incubated for 24 h in a shaker water bath at room
`temperature to allow the nail to dissolve. Extraction of drug
`was carried out by a slight modification of the method
`described by Dykes et al.[13] Briefly, after dissolving the
`nails in vials, 200 ml of 5 M hydrochloric acid was added to
`neutralize the mixture. Hexane (3 ml) was added to the vial
`to extract the drug and the vials were shaken manually for
`30 min. The mixtures were transferred into centrifuge tubes
`and centrifuged at 4000 rev/min for 10 min. The hexane
`layer was collected, 1 ml of 0.5 M sulfuric acid–isopropyl
`alcohol (85 : 15) was added and the mixture was shaken
`vigorously for 30 min. The lower acidic aqueous layer, which
`holds the majority of terbinafine, was collected separately
`and the amount of drug in the nail was determined. This
`
`

`

`Enhanced nail drug delivery by inorganic salts
`
`Anroop B. Nair et al.
`
`433
`
`extraction procedure was validated by spiking different drug
`concentrations (2–20 mg/ml) into sodium hydroxide solution
`in which the nail was previously dissolved. The recovery was
`found to be 84 ± 7%.
`The amount of terbinafine diffused into the peripheral
`region (which was not in contact with the formulation or
`enhancer) was determined by dissecting the peripheral nail
`area (4–5 mm surrounding), which was washed, dried and
`weighed. The amount of drug was determined as described
`above.
`
`Solubility measurements
`A normal equilibrium solubility determination was carried
`out by the method of Okumara et al.[14] An excess amount of
`terbinafine hydrochloride was added and dissolved in a
`measured amount of solution containing different concentra-
`tions of sodium phosphate (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 M)
`in a glass vial to obtain a saturated solution. The pH of the
`solution was adjusted to pH 3 or 5 (using 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M
`sodium hydroxide) and was monitored occasionally through-
`out the study period. The system was stirred for 24 h at room
`temperature and kept at rest for 1 h to assist the attainment
`of equilibrium. The solution was then filtered through a
`membrane filter (pore size 0.22 mm) and, after dilution, the
`solubility was determined.
`
`Effect of salt concentration on permeation
`Permeation of terbinafine in the presence of different
`concentrations of sodium phosphate (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 M)
`was carried out as described previously in preliminary in-vitro
`permeation studies. The donor drug concentration was 1 mg/ml
`(pH 3). The amount of drug permeated after 24 h was measured
`by HPLC.
`
`Effect of pretreatment on permeation
`Pretreatment of nails was carried out by soaking the nail
`plates in 0.5 M sodium phosphate solution (pH 3) for 24 h.
`The nail plates were then washed with 10 ml of water (pH 3)
`five times and mounted on a nail adapter. Drug solution
`(500 ml; 1 mg/ml; pH 3) was placed in the donor compart-
`ment. For control trials, the nail was soaked in water (pH 3).
`Permeation studies were carried out as described in
`preliminary in-vitro permeation studies.
`
`Effect of pH
`The influence of pH on the permeation of drug was assessed
`using 1 mg/ml of terbinafine hydrochloride solution (pH 5) in
`the absence of salt. Permeation was carried out as described
`previously in preliminary in-vitro permeation studies and the
`amount of terbinafine permeated after 24 h was determined.
`
`Permeation studies using dialysis membrane
`Permeation studies were carried out across the dialysis
`membrane (MWCO 1000, 7 Spectra/Por; Spectrum Labora-
`tories, Inc., CA, US) with varying concentration of sodium
`phosphate (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 M). The membrane was
`mounted between the donor and receiver chamber of a Franz
`diffusion cell (Logan Instruments Ltd., NJ, US). Drug–
`enhancer solution (500 ml; 1 mg/ml; pH 3) was placed in the
`donor compartment while the receiver chamber was filled
`
`with 5 ml of the respective sodium phosphate solutions
`without drug (pH 3), to maintain uniform osmotic pressure.
`The permeation area was 0.64 cm2. The solution in the
`receiver compartment was stirred at 600 rev/min with a
`3-mm magnetic stir bar. Samples were withdrawn at regular
`intervals from the receiver compartment and analysed.
`Control experiments were run in parallel for comparison
`using terbinafine solution (1 mg/ml; pH 3).
`
`Water uptake
`Nail pieces (4 ¥ 4 mm) were incubated at 37 ± 0.5∞C for
`24 h, weighed (W1) and soaked for 24 h in water (pH 3) or
`0.5 M sodium phosphate solution (pH 3). Then the nail plates
`were removed and wiped with Kimwipe to remove the
`surface water. Nails were placed in a screw-cap Pyrex vial
`containing pre-weighed anhydrous sodium sulfate (W2) and
`kept at room temperature until the weight of sodium sulfate
`(W3) remained constant (48 h). The increase in the weight of
`sodium sulfate was noted and the percentage water uptake of
`the nail was calculated by the following equation.
`
`% Water uptake = [(W3 - W2)/W1] ¥ 100
`
`(1)
`
`Permeation using poloxamer gel
`The poloxamer gel was prepared by a ‘cold process’. Drug
`solution (1 mg/ml; pH 3) was slowly added to poloxamer
`(21% w/v) with constant stirring at low temperature (4–5∞C)
`until the polymers were uniformly dispersed. The required
`amount of permeation enhancer (0.5 M sodium phosphate)
`was incorporated into the drug dispersion while mixing, and
`the pH was readjusted to 3 using 0.1 M HCl. The dispersion
`was mixed and then kept in a refrigerator (4–5∞C) overnight
`(12 h).
`The drug content was determined by accurately weighing
`1 g of each gel, which was diluted with ethanol (95%),
`filtered and assayed by HPLC. The drug content in the gel
`was found to be 0.84–0.89 mg/g.
`Nail plates were soaked in water for 1 h and mounted on
`a nail adaptor. Five-hundred milligrams of the viscous gel
`(with or without enhancer) was placed in the donor
`compartment and the permeation studies were carried out
`for a period of 24 h, as previously described in preliminary
`in-vitro permeation studies.
`
`Statistical analysis
`Statistical analysis on the effect of different salts on the
`permeation of terbinafine through the nail, drug load in the
`nail and the influence of concentration of sodium phosphate
`on the drug permeation across the nail and dialysis membrane
`was performed using two tailed Kruskal–Wallis test (Graph-
`pad Prism 5; Graphpad software, Inc., CA, US). In all cases,
`post-hoc comparisons of the means of individual groups were
`performed using Dunn’s test. The effect on enhancement of
`terbinafine permeation across nail and dialysis membrane with
`different concentrations of sodium phosphate was analysed
`using Mann–Whitney U-test. The data points provided in the
`graphs are an average of four trials. The error bars represents
`the standard deviation. P < 0.05 denoted significance in
`all cases.
`
`

`

`434
`
`Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 2009; 61: 431–437
`
`when compared with the control. The cumulative amount of
`drug permeated after 24 h with different salts (ammonium
`(8.09 ± 1.85 mg/cm2),
`sodium phosphate
`carbonate
`(11.44 ± 1.62 mg/cm2), calcium phosphate (7.75 ± 0.59 mg/
`cm2), potassium phosphate (10.47 ± 1.92 mg/cm2), sodium
`sulfite (6.93 ± 0.72 mg/cm2)) was found to be higher than the
`control (2.24 ± 0.72 mg/cm2). The profiles also indicated
`that the drug permeation was higher in the initial period
`(up to 12 h) and followed slow release afterwards, with all
`the enhancers studied.
`In contrast, control experiments
`exhibited much less permeation and the lag time to attain
`steady-state diffusion was ˜8 h.
`The drug load in the active diffusion area and peripheral
`area of the nail plate after 24 h of drug permeation studies
`with different enhancers and the control are represented in
`Figure 2. The inorganic salts enhanced the drug load in both
`the active diffusion area (4–7 fold, Kruskal–Wallis test,
`Dunn’s test, P = 0.011) and peripheral area (5–10 fold,
`Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.0275).
`Table 1 summarizes the solubility of terbinafine with
`different concentration of sodium phosphate at pH 3 and pH 5.
`The solubility decreased with increasing salt concentration at
`both pH 3 and pH 5.
`In the next step, permeation studies were carried out to
`evaluate the effect of the concentration of sodium phosphate
`(0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 M) on drug permeation across
`the nail plate using terbinafine solution (1 mg/ml pH 3), and
`the data obtained are presented in Figure 3. The drug
`permeation increased with increase in salt concentration
`increase in salt
`up to 1 M and decreased with further
`concentration (2–3 M) (Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.001). A
`similar effect was also observed when the permeation was
`carried out at different salt concentrations across the dialysis
`membrane (Figure 4).
`
`Results
`
`Figure 1 represents the effect of different inorganic salts at
`terbinafine
`0.5 M concentration on the permeation of
`hydrochloride across the nail plate. It is evident that the
`permeation was significantly enhanced (3–5 fold, Kruskal–
`Wallis test, Dunn’s test, P = 0.008) in the presence of salts
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`Time (h)
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`14
`
`12
`
`10
`
`8 6 4 2 0
`
`Cumulative amount permeated (␮g/cm2)
`
`Figure 1 Permeation profile of
`terbinafine hydrochloride in the
`presence of different salts. Permeation was carried out using terbinafine
`hydrochloride solution (1 mg/ml; pH 3) and the salt concentration was
`0.5 M. #, control; ♦, ammonium carbonate; ♢, potassium phosphate;
`■, sodium phosphate; !, calcium phosphate; , sodium sulfite. Data are
`expressed as mean ± SD, n = 4.
`
`Control
`
`m oniu m
`carbonate
`
`A m
`
`Calciu m
`phosphate
`
`Potassiu m
`phosphate
`
`Sodiu m
`phosphate
`
`Sodiu m
`sulfite
`
`(b)
`
`0.02
`
`0.015
`
`0.01
`
`0.005
`
`Amount of terbinafine (␮g/mg)
`
`0
`
`Control
`
`m oniu m
`carbonate
`
`A m
`
`Calciu m
`phosphate
`
`Potassiu m
`phosphate
`
`Sodiu m
`phosphate
`
`Sodiu m
`sulfite
`
`0.7
`
`0.6
`
`0.5
`
`0.4
`
`0.3
`
`0.2
`
`0.1
`
`0
`
`(a)
`
`Amount of terbinafine (␮g/mg)
`
`Figure 2 The amount of terbinafine hydrochloride loaded (mg/mg) in the nail diffusion area (a) and peripheral nail (b) during permeation studies in
`the presence of different salts (0.5 M) in 24 h. The diffusion area was 0.2 cm2. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 4.
`
`

`

`Enhanced nail drug delivery by inorganic salts
`
`Anroop B. Nair et al.
`
`435
`
`0.25 M
`
`1 M
`0.5 M
`2 M
`Concn of sodium phosphate
`
`3 M
`
`9 8 7 6 5
`
`4 3 2 1 0
`
`Enhancement factor
`
`Table 1 Solubility of terbinafine hydrochloride in water (pH 3 and 5)
`with different concentration of sodium phosphate
`
`Concentration
`of sodium phosphate (M)
`
`Terbinafine hydrochloride
`solubility (mg/ml)
`
`pH 5
`pH 3
`1.12 ± 0.16
`1.57 ± 0.23
`0
`0.86 ± 0.10
`1.41 ± 0.18
`0.25
`0.74 ± 0.14
`1.19 ± 0.25
`0.5
`0.63 ± 0.08
`0.98 ± 0.20
`1.0
`0.54 ± 0.12
`0.79 ± 0.16
`2.0
`0.42 ± 0.11
`0.69 ± 0.11
`3.0
`Solubility studies were carried out at room temperature (25 ± 1∞C). Each
`value represents the mean ± SD, n = 5.
`
`Figure 4 Comparison of enhancement
`in terbinafine hydrochloride
`permeation across nail and dialysis membrane in the presence of different
`concentration of sodium phosphate. Enhancement was calculated with
`respect to control (1 mg/ml, pH 3 water). The donor constituted 1 mg/ml of
`terbinafine hydrochloride. Open columns, dialysis membrane; shaded
`columns, nail. Data are expressed as means ± SD, n = 4.
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`Time (h)
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`12
`
`10
`
`8
`
`6
`
`4
`
`2
`
`0
`
`Cumulative amount permeated (␮g/cm2)
`
`Figure 5 Effect of sodium phosphate on the permeation of terbinafine
`hydrochloride from poloxamer gel across the nail plate. The concen-
`tration of sodium phosphate used was 0.5 M. ♦, sodium phosphate;
`#, control. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 4.
`
`Amount permeated in nail (␮g/cm2)
`
`18
`16
`14
`12
`10
`
`8 6 4 2 0
`
`0 M
`
`2 M
`1 M
`0.5 M
`0.25 M
`Concn of sodium phosphate
`
`3 M
`
`250
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`Amount permeated in dialysis
`
`membrane (␮g/cm2)
`
`Figure 3 Comparison of
`terbinafine
`the cumulative amount of
`permeated across the dialysis membrane and nail at the end of 24 h
`with different concentrations (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 3 M) of sodium
`phosphate. The diffusion area of the dialysis membrane and nail were
`0.64 cm2 and 0.2 cm2, respectively. Open columns, dialysis membrane;
`shaded columns, nail. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 4.
`
`Mechanistic aspects on the enhancement of terbinafine
`permeation by inorganic salts were studied by pretreatment
`of nails with sodium phosphate solution (0.5 M for 24 h) and
`then followed by the permeation studies. The amount of
`terbinafine permeated after 24 h across the treated and
`untreated nail plate was 3.03 ± 0.52 and 2.39 ± 0.44 mg/cm2,
`respectively. Water uptake study indicated a higher percen-
`tage water uptake by the nail in the presence of inorganic
`(36.34 ± 4.68%) when compared with control
`salt
`(26.27 ± 4.55%). The cumulative amount of
`terbinafine
`permeated after 24 h from the formulated gel containing
`0.5 M sodium phosphate (9.70 ± 0.93 mg/cm2) was found to
`be comparable with the amount of drug permeated from
`solution (11.44 ± 1.62 mg/cm2) (Figure 5).
`
`Discussion
`
`Preliminary in-vitro permeation studies were carried out
`across the nail plate with different inorganic salts using
`terbinafine hydrochloride solution (1 mg/ml; pH 3). The
`concentration of all salts was kept at 0.5 M for the purpose of
`comparison. The donor vehicle was adjusted to pH 3 as the
`drug possesses high solubility at this pH as compared with
`
`higher pH. From Figure 1 the ability of salts to enhance the
`permeation of terbinafine across the nail plate and reduce
`the lag time to attain steady-state diffusion is evident. All the
`salts were comparable in their enhancement efficiency (3–5
`fold), although with sodium phosphate the difference to the
`control was significant (˜5-fold enhancement). This is the
`first report to our knowledge on the enhancement effect of
`inorganic salts in transungual drug delivery.
`
`

`

`436
`
`Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 2009; 61: 431–437
`
`During permeation across biological membranes, a certain
`amount of drug is retained in the barrier. The drug retention is
`a factor of its solubility in the membrane, pH–pKa conditions
`of the experiment and concentration of the drug. Retention due
`to irreversible binding generally hampers the permeation of a
`drug into deeper tissues in topical drug delivery. However, in
`the case of nail, we observed that the terbinafine loaded in
`the nail during the permeation process formed a depot and
`released subsequently to provide prolonged therapeutic effect
`in the affected target tissue underneath the nail plate.[15] It is
`evident from Figure 2a in our study that the presence of salts
`significantly enhanced the drug load (4–7 fold) compared
`with the control. Like permeation, the highest drug load was
`observed with sodium phosphate (0.47 ± 0.16 mg/mg).
`Further, the amount of drug permeated across the nail plate
`was found to be proportional to the drug load in the nail.
`The amount of drug loaded in the active diffusion area
`represents the area of nail that is in direct contact with the
`formulation. In vivo, this would be the exposed part of the nail
`available for application of drug formulation. Onychomycosis
`affects the whole nail apparatus, which includes the nail that is
`not accessible due to overlap by the nail fold. Therefore, the
`drug loaded in the active diffusion area is required to diffuse
`peripherally into the area that is unexposed to formulation.
`This peripheral diffusion, in turn, plays a crucial role in the
`success of the onychomycosis therapy. In our permeation
`experiments, the amount of drug loaded into the surroundings
`of the active diffusion nail area was also assessed. The amount
`of drug reaching the peripheral nail area depends on the
`concentration gradient between the active diffusion area and
`peripheral nail area. It is obvious that the salts enhanced the
`drug load in the peripheral nail as they could enhance the drug
`load in the active diffusion area (Figure 2b).
`Given the promising results in the preliminary permeation
`studies, further studies on the effect of salt on transungual drug
`delivery was investigated using sodium phosphate as a
`representative salt enhancer. An increase in salt concentration
`did lead to increased drug permeation. However, the drug
`permeation decreased at higher salt concentrations (2–3 M)
`(Figure 3). To obtain further insight into the mechanisms
`responsible for the enhancement of drug permeation by
`inorganic salts, further studies were carried out. Generally,
`drug penetration enhancers act by modifying the structure of
`the barrier or by driving the drug into the barrier. If the
`permeation enhancers are capable of bringing about irrever-
`sible changes in the barrier property of the tissue, then the
`permeability of the nail plate would be enhanced upon
`pretreatment of the nail plate with the penetration enhancer.
`Hence to assess the effect of salts on the barrier property of
`nail, permeation studies were carried out across nails that had
`been pretreated with sodium phosphate solution (0.5 M for
`24 h). The permeation of terbinafine in 24 h across the treated
`(3.03 ± 0.52 mg/cm2) and control (2.39 ± 0.44 mg/cm2) nail
`plate suggests that the terbinafine permeation enhancement
`observed (in preliminary studies and the effect of salt
`concentration in the subsequent studies) was not due to any
`irreversible structural alteration of the nail plate.
`The other possible mechanism responsible for the penetra-
`tion enhancement
`is thermodynamic driving due to the
`concentration gradient. To explain the enhancement of
`
`permeation based on thermodynamic activity, one should
`know the solubility of drug in different concentrations of sodium
`phosphate solution. From Table 1, it can be noted that the
`solubility of terbinafine hydrochloride decreased with an
`increase in salt concentration. It is well known that permeation
`flux is maximal from saturated solutions of drug due to the
`maximum thermodynamic activity. In this study the donor
`concentration used was 1 mg/ml and from Table 1 it is apparent
`that
`the thermodynamic activity of terbinafine increased
`in the salt solution in the order of 0.25 < 0.5 < 1 M. At 1 M
`concentration, the solubility was 0.98 ± 0.20 mg/ml, which has
`the maximum thermodynamic activity of unity. Thus, it appears
`that increase in thermodynamic activity is one of the mechan-
`isms for the enhanced terbinafine permeation (cumulative
`amount permeated in 24 h) across the nail plate. At concentra-
`tions >1 M the thermodynamic activity still remained one, but
`the absolute solubility of drug decreased with increasing salt
`concentration. This is the likely reason for the decrease in drug
`permeation from salt solution concentrations above 1 M. Although
`there was a meaningful relationship interpreted between the per-
`meation data and thermodynamic activity, this experiment does
`not rule out the possible real time effect of salts on the nail plate.
`To understand the relative contribution of thermodynamic
`activity and the potential real time effect of salts on the nail
`plate, two sets of permeation studies were carried out. In the first
`set, permeation studies were carried out across the nail using
`terbinafine hydrochloride solution (1 mg/ml) at pH 5 (in the
`absence of salt) in which the thermodynamic activity of the
`solution would be higher than at pH 3 due to low drug solubility.
`The drug solubility at pH 3 and 5 was 1.57 ± 0.23 and
`1.12 ± 0.16 mg/ml, respectively. The cumulative amount of
`drug permeated across the nail at pH 5 was 1.5-fold
`(3.38 ± 0.39 mg/cm2) that observed at pH 3. This study further
`confirms that the thermodynamic activity has a significant
`role to play in the transungual drug permeation enhancement
`by salts. Here the important point to note is that the solubility
`of terbinafine at pH 5 in the absence of any salt (1.12 ±
`0.16 mg/ml) was comparable with its solubility at pH 3 in the
`presence of 0.5 M sodium phosphate (1.19 ± 0.25 mg/ml).
`However, the enhancement in drug permeation observed in the
`latter case was significantly higher (5 fold) than in the former.
`In the second set of studies, the permeation experiments were
`carried out at different salt concentrations across a dialysis
`membrane. The salt concentration on both sides of the
`membrane was the same so as to avoid a concentration gradient.
`In this case, the cumulative amount permeated showed a similar
`salt-concentration-dependent trend as observed with the nail
`permeation studies (Figure 3). However, it is noteworthy that the
`permeation enhancement factor (in dialysis membrane) over the
`control was lower (Mann–Whitney U-test, P = 0.0286) than that
`observed across the nail plate (Figure 4). The above two sets of
`studies suggests that there could be additional mechanisms
`contributing to the permeation enhancement by salts, besides
`thermodynamic activity.
`Water is known to be a plasticizer for nail as it hydrates
`up to ~25% of the nail weight.[16] It is well known that most
`of the permeation enhancers generally increase the hydration
`level of nail keratin molecules. Increased hydration of keratin
`molecules is believed to provide a continuous pathway to
`the diffusion of molecules across the nail plate and thereby
`
`

`

`Enhanced nail drug delivery by inorganic salts
`
`Anroop B. Nair et al.
`
`437
`
`enhances the permeation and drug load.[17] Moreover, it is
`also reported that the pH of the solution does not influence
`the nail hydration level.[18] Hence it was thought rational to
`determine the water uptake of nail
`in the presence and
`absence of salt at pH 3. The calculated percentage of water
`uptake by nail
`in the presence of salt enhancer was
`36.34 ± 4.68%, and for the control it was 26.27 ± 4.55%.
`The apparent difference in hydration level due to the
`presence of sodium phosphate is one of the key mechanisms
`responsible for the transungual drug permeation enhance-
`ment effect of salts. However, quantifying the water content
`in the nail plate at different salt concentrations would be a
`challenging task due to the difference between the tissues and
`due to the lack of any simple and sensitive method of
`measuring water in a way applicable to the present case.
`Neverthless, from this study we can speculate that
`the
`increase in salt concentration increases the hydration of
`keratin in the nail plate. When the drug concentration in the
`salt solution is constant (as in the case of salt concentra-
`tions <1 M), the increased hydration would in turn increase
`the drug loading in the nail. At salt concentrations above 1 M,
`the absolute drug concentration is less, which is likely the
`reason for the relative decrease in the drug load, despite the
`increased hydration of nail plate at higher salt concentration.
`The last phase of study was intended to develop a suitable
`formulation and assess the permeation across the nail plate.
`As mentioned earlier there are different formulations available
`for topical application to the nails. Most of these are nail
`lacquers in which a film-forming polymer is dissolved in a
`rapidly evapo

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket