throbber
PDR®
`
`54
`
`EDITION
`
`
`
`titlDi-WIS
`
`m DEC '2 3 1999
`are. rim LiBi‘li-‘iiw
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PHYSICIANS
`DESK
`PEEEPENCE®
`
`
`
`
`
`Senior Vice President. Directory Services: Pau! Walsh
`
`Director of Product Management: Mark A. Friedman
`Associate Product Manager: Bill Shaughnessy
`Senior Business Manager: Mark S. Ritchin
`financial Analyst: Wayne M. Soiiis
`Director of Sales: Oiitran N. Barsamian
`fiatlonal Sales Manager, Pharmaceutical Sales: Anthony Some
`National Account Manager: Don Bruceoleri
`Senior Avenunt Manager: Frank Karkowsky
`Account Mfill'lflgers'r:
`Marion Gray. RPli
`Lawrence 0- Hoary
`Jeffrey F- Piohi
`Suzanne 5- Ya'mw- RN
`Electronic Sales Account Manager: Stephen M. Silverberg
`National Sales Manager. Medical Economics Trade Bales: Bill Gaflney
`Director of Direct Marketing: Michael Bennett
`”St and Production Manager: Lorraine M' Loenihg
`Senior Marketing may“: Dina A' Maeder
`
`Director. New Business Development and
`Professional Support Services: Mukesh Mehta. RPh
`Manager. Drug iniormation Services: Thomas Fleming. RPh
`Drug Information Specialist: Marla Deutsch. MS. RPh. CDE
`Editor. Directory Services: David W. Sifton
`Senior Associate Editor: Lori Murray
`Director of Production: Carrie Williams
`Manager of Production: Kimberly H. Vivas
`Senior Production Coordlnator: Amy B. Brooks
`Production Coordinators: Gianna Caradonna. Maria Volpali
`Data Manager: Jeffrey D. Schaefer
`Senior Format Editor: Gregory J. Westley
`Index Editors: Johanna M. Mazur. Robert N. Woerner
`Ari: Associate: Joan K. Akerlind
`Senior Digital Imaging Coordinator: Shawn W. Cahill
`Digital Imaging Coordinator: Frank J. McEIroy. III
`Electronic Publishing Designer: LiVlO Udina
`Fulfillment Manager: Stephanie DeNardi
`
`
`
`I“. Copyright ® 2000 and published by Medical Economics Company, Inc a! Moi-rivals, NJ 07645-1742. All righls reserved. None or the content of this publication may
`be reproduced. stored in a relrlel-‘fll Sir-Stem. resold. redistributed. or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic. mechanical. photocopying. recording. or
`othemise) wilhout the prior written permission of the Publisher. PHYSiCiANS' DESK REFERENCE”. FDR“. PDFI For Ophthalmology”. Pocket PDFr‘. and The PDFi" Family
`Guide to Prescription Drugs” are registered lrademarks used herein under license PDR For Nonprescription Drugs and Dietary Supplements“. FDR Companion Guide”.
`PDFP’ior Herbal Medicines”. POW Medical Dictionary”. FDR“ Nurse's Drug Handbookm‘. FDR” Nurse's Diclionary‘“. The Port“ Family Guide Encyclopedia of Medical
`Care‘“. The PDFP Family Guide to Natural Medicines and Healing Therapies”. The F‘DFI’El Family Golda to Common AilmenislM. The PDR’ Famliy Guide to Over-the—
`Counter Drugs”. and FDR“ Electronic Library“ are trademarks used herein under license.
`
`Officers 0" Medical EBOI'IDI'MCS Company: President and Chief EXECUUW 037C?!” Curtis S. Allen; Vice President, New Moon): L. Suzanne 3909"; Vice President. Corporate Human
`Resources: Pameia M. Bilash; Wee President and Chief information Officer: Steven M. Bressler: Chief financiai Officer: Christopher Candi: Vice President and Controller: Barry
`Gray; Vice President. New Business Planning: Linda G. Hope,- Vice President Business integration: David i'i. Piiier: W'ce President. finance: Donna Santarp'ra; Senior Vice Presidenr.
`Directory Services: Paul Walsh; Senior Vice President. Operations: John R. WarE: Senior Vice President. iniemei Strategies: Raymond Zoetler
`® Printed on recycled paper
`
`ISBN: 156363-3302
`
`CIPLA EXHIBIT 1008
`
`Page 1 of 9
`
`CIPLA EXHIBIT 1008
`Page 1 of 9
`
`

`

`
`
`PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION GUIDEISOB
`
`)__——’ —
`marobums will“ "W'
`
`on} P. "I III
`
`Bllll‘nl-Nvlnl soul-n autumn P. am a:
`_
`_.
`..
`.
`
`amnmbmuu qumn onaatoar I. B”
`
`all
`i: [1:
`
`I”
`I
`‘
`I
`20 mg
`n10 mg
`NDIII'IIIIIC.
`50 m5
`1° mg
`[phenylpmpanelamlne HCI. phanlnuamlna
`Him.”
`“in...”
`mm":
`tnrlratu. chlowhnnlmmine malaflm
`
`(megsslml acetate lableta. USP}
`:etoposlds] Capsules
`[memmmgemmnu acatale tablets. USP:
`50 mg ,r 24 mg ,I 4 mg
`BIIIITDL-M'llfl nulaa wool-0M P. on m:
`anmawrm_nnulnamnumou r. m a-m
`clflllllfll
`n. no In:
`trauma!
`
`a:
`
`-
`
`I.
`
`annulment
`
`In an
`
`61-3:
`
`“1
`
`“Hm“
`
`" “I.
`
`.
`
`’
`.
`f
`('
`A-
`35 ”'5
`i'ImInIllno
`Bull'l‘lrlla PIM
`[humans]. LISP. melemlnophen. USP:
`
`lphandlmelrazlne taru'ato taulals, USP:
`50 mg I 325 ms
`flvlll
`cumucv.
`n. Inn n:
`ellilfllflfi
`
`9. m
`
`p. m
`
`.
`Illll
`~-
`
`'
`‘
`'
`WINE.
`
`‘rli‘.
`.-
`
`mm
`~_
`_
`
`».
`
`-
`rq
`-"
`.
`mi
`:3?“
`200 ml
`
`E
`.fif-
`. 6-5553]
`'
`'
`500 mg
`
`a:
`
`
`
`l
`'
`1
`;
`
`[L
`
`you lnpucuun
`
`1m.
`mM‘
`Wm...
`
`1.5m Mulwom vlal
`
`Ly mlllzod c nun“
`[ dig?”Imam [mff’acflom USP:
`.7 _ch‘wL‘mE—“W Rx
`
`Munoz”
`(mssnal Inlacunn
`aamnmrznunum onumnv I. an ax
`
`'
`
`_
`100
`”ES.
`ermwablegolaperglmBuffered Tablet:
`BRIIIOLMVIIIIDUIIIIMHIIIOIMIYF an N
`
`
`Phrlnllln' Forte
`Iwmlbilal. LISP. semamlnonhan. usp:
`50 ms f 5‘50 fl
`9.90:. or:
`unusual:
`new.
`
`105 “3
`nontrll' Slow-Run"
`lnl'landlmelrazine wtratol
`flillllla)‘
`
`.- - ca Itnl" and coaoln-
`15 “1E
`III Illlllol‘ldal'l
`lacemrnlnophen. meme phosphate)
`120 rnyfi mL. 12 WE mL
`OMINIIIOII
`
`-“‘“ "'5‘
`..
`..,
`w» ."t
`‘5‘“;
`“0mg
`
`“I.
`.
`_
`‘00m5
`
`Droxla“
`__ “um-meal capsules. USP]
`K' mm. --.m IQIIIII oucomv r. so:
`
`“
`
`do mg
`also mallabls In 5 mg and 20 mg
`Mutam ill"
`[mimmycln [or In actlon. USP]
`”lawman-awn uncanny p.914
`' ‘ -
`.
`'—.'
`30ml
`40 mg
`E
`
`
`
`:50 mg
`
`9
`
`hill.
`(stavudlna) Capsules
`m: mum-mmnulummmouv p. m can
`
`
`E
`It“ LA
`
`I». an:
`
`(phsruyIpmnann amlne H01. gualfannaln]
`75 mg g 400 mg
`CIRMRIEI
`
`F -
`
`8657
`
`rm
`
`ax
`
`p.001 mt
`
`
`
`pug-cl”
`[phanlrlprupenulumlns HCI. USP)
`unnuuu
`Q
`.
`
`.
`
`g'
`f
`500mg
`
`:2. I01
`
`5
`
`/]-' 1r
`
`_
`
`\-750 ms
`
`i»
`
`-,
`u...
`_ flaw“:
`12“." ___.
`
`10”.:-
`4-» _ av
`
`g
`
`450 mg
`-
`Paraplailn"
`[cerbnplatin lot lljljecuonl
`um mlllllltllllll one av I an
`
`nx
`
`
`
`100 mg
`.n
`1'30 m8
`I "ma vlal
`
`’- mlaou'
`EPIIHI'IOP'A
`quanta] fut InJacllon
`Iciaplatln Injection
`
`I
`I... v u as mum ammo“ 9. an I:
`umnomnna nuln ouwlonv P. m.
`‘
`I
`
`"
`
`,
`"’
`
`
`
`‘1
`
`l
`
`I.
`
`out.
`llwdroc
`one hllertrate. USP.
`acmminonhan. USP}
`5 mg I 600 mg
`animal
`
`Ill
`
`a In: ow
`
`“"10!“
`Isalsalate lahleta, USP:
`Mammal:
`~
`
`P. we
`
`a-w
`
`P. m In:
`
`I. one
`
`- ---
`zanrr-
`
`
`.-
`_,",'_°"‘“fl§
`:h' :5
`fi'
`-
`L"
`mL
`1
`ml.
`2
`nuns
`[stflULlfllnHI for Olal Solutlon
`BIG P" H R MM: Ell“
`m punmuurluu
`
`mt
`
`
`
`-
`
`MuItI-dosu vial
`Alan mum» in 30 ms.
`100 ms Mum-dose vlala
`TAXOIP
`:pacllml} lnlwion
`WWII.
`autumn“ sauna oncomv n ass n:
`
`C
`I
`; % mt
`|
`-...w-"‘
`_ Q-
`"
`'\ w
`-
`‘
`15 mg tablets
`
`Omdrln"
`{axandrolone taunts. USP}
`In wuanmnlunms
`
`p. on
`
`Illdfln'
`lawmmopmn, USP. Walk-alum
`dluhlora nhanazona. USP.
`IIIIIIIIII‘
`[laumalheftena mucate. USP.
`maleats.USP. WMWIEI‘III-e Hcl. USP!
`awtaminnphan. usp}
`
`650
`j n mg f 25 m5
`65 mg ,l‘ 100 mg f 325 mg
`0""!!!le
`DAIIIIIIIK
`[F3
`.55
`K”2
`W
`alumna
`“°° ’"5
`(dlfunoxln as tha Hal. atmplna sulfatn}
`SI‘OIIIII‘Ila
`
`1 mg 3 0.025 mg
`(metaxalune)
`ennumeu
`nnunm
`
`n. in:
`
`nu
`
`r. m
`
`.
`
`I
`
`I.
`,
`
`_
`3.5
`
`”5
`
`500 ms
`
`100 In!
`
`200 ma
`
`.
`
`m.
`
`. ..
`_
`nruslmm '3',Inna
`"‘—-‘——-——— "I”
`”mm'fllnnwmamuiu "‘—
`New“ P. m Int
`
`"
`
`'
`
`.-

`
`‘
`
`
`
`___
`
`M
`
`-
`u
`v
`mi
`LW
`r-
`
`Ill
`-
`'
`
`
`
`a
`1%.. «A
`‘4:_‘__
`..." .
`{JEN-.9-
`m {Wig
`q”,
`E—T-h"
`mi.
`2m
`200 mm
`40 WmL
`1 mL un mafia
`5 mL mulllpla
`1
`10° W 600
`_
`me. or.
`I:
`50 m5
`25 mg
`2
`mg.
`was close syringe
`any, vial
`Also avalluble In 150 mg.
`Ithalldumlda) Capsules
`{pnenlndamlno Inmate}
`Imeaealmll $39.;”'"°“
`““5"”
`Dem-lair I-
`Nollhlst‘
`TIIALDMII)’
`{310905135} for Injemlnn
`llestustarone enanume ”news“. USP:
`
`Nlmlnn'
`(naprlnan sodium
`Wifolledxralww IIIDIBISI
`unnmu
`
`P. col
`
`an
`
`r. r'
`‘-
`
`u
`
`300
`
`m!
`"'wa
`{lheophylllna amnumelem mblela]
`CELGENE
`
`a:
`“gunman
`
`r m
`
`CIPLA EXHIBIT 1008
`
`Page 2 of 9
`
`CIPLA EXHIBIT 1008
`Page 2 of 9
`
`

`

`BRISTOL-MYE PIS SOUIBB 0NCJ|MMJ331
`PRODUCT INFORMATION
` Skin reactions associated with
`Handling and Dlspoeel:
`Table 1: Summary of Pharmaenllnnle Par-nature - Mean Value:
`dommhilrin have been repel-bed. Shin aneidentlg exposed to
`om-
`melon
`a
`c...
`AUG III-ear
`T-I-Iau-
`ct.
`dexorubicin should be rinsed copiously with soap and warm
`(Irwin-’1
`Detention no
`tons-nu}
`[-19:le
`Ina-Main
`lbl
`ILmi-n'r
`water. and iftho eyes are involved, standard irrigation tech-
`niques should be used immediately. The use of goggles.
`135
`24
`2
`195
`6300
`52.7
`21.7
`gloves. and protective gowns is recommended during prep
`175
`24
`4
`365
`7993
`15.7
`23.s
`oration and adminisnafion'or’ the drug.
`135
`3
`7
`2170
`7952
`13.1
`17.7
`Procedures for proper handling and dispose] of anticancer
`
`3 5 8650 15007 20.2175 12.2
`
`
`
`
`
`drugs should he considered. Sayers] guidelines on this sub-
`ject have been published.M There is no general agreem—t
`= Maximum plasma concentration
`that all of the procedures recommended in the guidelines
`are necessary or appropriate.
`aiié (ll-W] - Area under the plasma concentration-time cur-vs from time I] to infinity
`(1...: Total body clearance
`HOW SUPPLIED
`DESCRIPTION
`BUBEXCD (docwruhicin hydrochloride for injection, USP) is
`activity recovered in the feces. while metabolites, primarily
`available as follows:
`Gel-hydromaclitaxel. accounted for the balance. in Intro
`TAXOLD (psalitasell Injection is a clear colorless to slightly
`studies with human liver microsernsa and tissue slices
`Ming—Escheingle-dosovialoontains 50mg ofdoaorulri'
`yellow viscous solution. It is supplied as a nopsqueous solu-
`cin HCI. USP as a sterile red-crsnge lyophililed
`showed that paclitmel was metabolized primarily to 8n-
`tion intended for dilution with a suitable parenteral fluid
`powder, MOI: 0016-3352-22Availahls as one indi-
`hydroxypaclitanel by the cytochrome P450 isusyina .
`prior to intravenous infusion TAXOL is available in 30 mg
`vidually cartcned vial.
`CYPZCS: and to two minor metabolites. 8'-P~h!dl'0macli-.
`(5 le. 100 mg (16.7 mL]. and 300 mg (50 mL) midfidose
`100 mg —Eech singiealoee vial contains 100 mg of doctora-
`tamel and Go. 3’-p-dihydroxypulitanel. by CYP3A4. In ultra.
`vials. Each InL of sterile ocnpyinganic solution contains 6
`bicln HCI. USP as a sterile red-orange lyophil'md
`the metabolism ofpanbtaasl to dis:
`clitaxel was in-
`mg paclitexel. 527 mg of purified GremopbcI-Q EL' (poly-
`powder. NBC 00154335322. Available as one indi-
`hibited by a number of agents (Roommate. vorapamj],
`oayethylsted caster oil) and 49.7% (We) dehydrated alcohol.
`USP.
`vidually Iarhnned vial.
`dissepam, quinsdine. daaamethaaone. cyclospon'n tenipo-
`Storage: Store dry powder at controlled room temperature
`Paclitaxel is a natural product with antitumor activity.
`side. etapoaide, and vincxistine]. but the concentrations
`15'40'0 (59'45’Fl.
`used emeded those found is vice following normal thera-
`TAXOL is obtainedvia a asmi-syoflrsfic process From Thurs
`The reconstituted solution is stable for 7 days at room tern-
`peutic doses. Thetaaterooe, 17a~etbinyl eata'adiol. refinoic
`boot-arc. The chemical name tier paclitexel is SBmEposy-
`acid. and quercctin. a specific inhibitorafCYPBCS. also ill-
`paraturo or 15 days under refrigeration T—S'C (”'46'17).
`1.2c1.4,79,103.13o-hexshydrmqrtax-11-en-9-one 4,10—dr'ace—
`hihited the formation of Ga-
`aclitaloel I'J'r vim. The
`Protectfromeaposucetoaunlight.fletainincamnuntil
`tate Zsbenccate Iii-eater with (QRfisl-N-beazoyl-li-pbenyli-
`time of ".39.
`eoserine.
`pl'lsrmsonldnofim ofpanlitaxal may also be altered in ciao
`as a result of interactions with compounds that are sub
`Paclitsxel has the following structural formula:
`REFERENCES
`ah'ates, inducers. cur inhibitors of CYPZCS andfcr CYP3A4.
`1. Rudolph R, Larson BL: Etiology and Treatment. qube-
`(See PRECAUTIONS: Drug Interactions section.) The ef-
`motherspeutic Agent Eatmvsaation Injuries: A Review. J
`fect ofrenal orhspatic dysfunction on the disposition of pa-
`Olin Onto! 1987:5:11.16—1126.
`clitml has not been investigated.
`2. Recommendations for the Safe Handling of Parenteral
`Possible interactions of paclitsrnsl with concomitantly ad-
`Aufineoplas‘hic Drugs. NH-IPuhlication No 83-2621. For
`ministered medicaticns have not been formally investi-
`sale by the Superintendent of Documents US Govern-
`gated.
`ment Printing Oilice. Washington. DC m2.
`3_. AMA Council Report. Guidelines for Handling Parenteral
`‘CremopharOELiethemgiatemdh'ademarkofBASFAk-
`Anfineeplsstics. JAM! 1986; 253 (11]:1590-1592.
`tieogeleflehafit GramophortllELiafiu-firerpurifiedbya
`Bristol-Myers Squibb Company proprietary process before
`4. National Study Commission on Cytotoxic Exposure—
`1188.
`Recommendations fcr Handling Cytotoxic Agents. Avail-
`able from Louis P. Jefl'rsy. ScD. Chairman, National
`CLINICAL STUDIES
`Study Commission on Cytotoxic Exposure, Massachu-
`Ovarian Carcinoma:
`setts College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Sciences.
`179 Lengwood Menus. Boston. Massachusetts 02115.
`_5. Clinical Oncological Society of Australia. Guidelines and
`Recommendafim lbr Batu Handling of Antineoplaafic
`Agents. Med J Australia 1988; 13126-423.
`6.Jonll RB, et a1: Sal’s Handling of Chemotherapeutic
`Agents: A Report from the Mount Sinai Medical Center.
`CA—fi Concer‘Jom-nor' for Clinicians 1933: (SeptI'Octl
`253-383.
`7. American Society ofHospita] Pharmacists Tbchnical Ase
`eistanee Bulletin on Handling Cytotoxic and Hazardous
`Drugs AmJHusp Flier-m 1990; 47:1033—1049
`8. Controlling Occupational
`he Hazardous Drugs.
`(031% WORK:PRACTICE summer. Am J Health-
`Sysr Plum 1.996963 1669-1685.
`Ila-cl Johnson
`ONDDIDGY PRODUCTS
`A Bristol--l\1yera Staribb Company
`Princeton. NJ 03543
`USA.
`Ell-13001499
`51-004726-02
`
`
`
`
`
`CIPLA EXHIBIT 1008
`
`Page 3 of 9
`
`Paclitaxel is a white to eff-white crystalline powder with the
`empiriral fierula CanNOH and a molecular weight. of
`853.9. It is highly lipopbilic. insoluble in water. and melts at
`around 216-217'0.
`.
`_
`CLINICAL mower
`Peelituel is a novel anemia-ems agent that promotes
`the assembly of microt'ubules from tubulin dimers and sta-
`bilizes mimtuhules by preventing depolymerisation. This
`stability results in the inhibition ofthe normal dynamic re-
`organization ofthe mimtu'bule network that is essential for
`vital interpbase. end mitotic cellular firndiona. In addition.
`paclitasel induces abnormal am or 'bundlea' ofmierotu-
`bulee througlmut the cell cycle and multiple asters ofmiero-
`tubules during mitosis.
`Following intravenous administration of I131111011, paelitaxel
`plasma concentrations declined in a hiphaeic manner. The
`initial rapid decline represents distribution to the periph-
`eral compartment and elimination of the drug. The later
`phaeeie due, anart. to a relatively slow sfluxofperli‘tsxal
`from the peripheral compartment.
`Phsmamfinetic parameters ofpoclitaxel fbllowing S- and
`21-hour infusions ofTAXOL at dose levels ef135 and 115
`rr'rgfrn2 weredcherminedinel’haaearandomiaedstudyin
`wadsncancerpsfientsonoameummerissdin thefollm
`irrg table:
`[See table 1 above]
`It appeared that with the 24-hour infusion ofTAXOL. a 30%
`increase in dose (135 mgr‘m" versus 175 Ingfm’} increased
`the C... lay 8796. whereas lhe'A‘UC {0-H} remained propor-
`ticnal. However. with a 3-hour infusion. for a 30% increase
`indoseJhechuandAUClO-euweminmsaedbyfis‘bsnd
`59%, respectively. The mean apparent volume of distribu-
`tion at steady state, with the 24-hour infirsiorn of TAXOL.
`mmwmmw‘.iudinengmmsm-
`cular distribution andJ'cr tissue binding of paclitasel.
`The pharmmlcinefim of psclitaxel were also evaluated in
`adult center patients who received single doses of 15—135
`given by Liner infusions (n:15).80—2?5 ngm'
`
`given byEl6-hour infirsiona (11:36}. and 200-215 mgz‘m‘grven’
`by2+hourinfusionsln=6tlinPheee1k2ehrdiquss
`For CL; andvolume ofdistx'ihnfisn were consistent with the
`findings in the Phase 3 study. The pherrnacokinetics of
`TAXOL in patients with AXES-related Kaposi's sarcoma
`have not. been studied.
`In eilm studies ofbinding to human serum proteins, using
`podium] mneenh-afionsrengingfi-om 0.1t050ugfnrl... in-
`dicate that between Elia-98% ofdrug is bound; the presence
`of cimofidine. rarlitidine. demetbaeone. cr- diphenhydrs—
`mine did ootatfectprotein bindingcfpecb'taxal.
`Ailm- intravenous administration of 15-275 mafia: doses at
`TAXOL as 1‘. 6-. or 24—hour infusions. mean values for cu-
`mulative urinary mover-y of unchanged drug ranged from
`1.3% to 12.5% of the dose. indicating extensive nun-Ten
`clearance. In five patientaadminister'ed a 225 01250le
`dnseefradiolahelsdmflLasasmom-infusion. umeaan
`11% oftbe radioactivity was excreted in the feces in 120
`hem, and 14% was wavered in the urine. Total recovery or
`radioactivity ranged from 55% to 101% of the dose. Pachw
`towel representedameanofase oftheadmjnietarodradio—
`
`first-line Dela—The asset; and cficocy of TAXOL (peeli-
`taxell Injection (136 Inga: ever 24 hours)In combination
`with exisplatin (1'5 mglm )in patients with advanced ovarian
`cancer and. no prior chemotherapy were evaluatedIn a
`Phase 3 multimeter; randomised. controlled (vs. cydophos.
`phomida 750 Inglm fueplafin 75 mom”) 1:311:qu ai-l con-
`ducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (606}. Atocal of
`410 patients with Stage III or N disease (>1 no residual
`disease after slam Isparotomy or distant metastases)
`were randomised. Patients heated with TAXOL to combina—
`tion with eiaplatrin had significantly longer time to progres-
`sion (median 16.6 vs. 13.0 months. pecans) and nearly a
`year lengarmedisn survival time 920.0002) compared with
`standard therapy:
`(Seeteble a attopofnextpene]
`The adverse event: profile for patients receiving TAXDL'in
`combination with ciaphtin in this study was generally urn-
`eistentwitb that eeeofirrthepooled analysis olden from
`81.2 patients treated with aingleagsnt 128101. in 1.0 clinical
`atudies.’lhaaesdveraoemtaandadversoavnntsfmmthe
`Phase 8 first-line ovarian cerdnoma study are described in
`them REACTIONS sed‘ionintehularfl‘ableafl
`and 9) and narrative form.
`Second-line Data—Data from live Phase 1 Us 2 clinical
`studies (189 patients). a molticencsr randomised Phase 3
`atnl‘lyldlll’pafienlsl. aswellasauintarimanalyaiaofdata
`from more than 300 patients enrolled in a treatment refer-
`ral center program were used in support of the use of
`IIEMCEJL in patients who have failed initial or subsequent
`chemothsrsoyfpr metastsuccsmnmmoftheovmv. Mot
`tbePhaseZatudieaflfl patientsluliliaedaninitialdoaaod
`135 to 110 argon"In most patients 690%) administered
`ever 21 hours by continuous infusion. Response rates in
`these two studies were 22% (95% Cl: 11% to B'Hd and m
`{55%01: lflhmlwitbsmfleffimplefimd leper
`tial responses in 92 patients. The median duration el'cverall
`reapenseintheestwostndiesmeosuredfiomtheflrstdayod’
`treatment was “1.2 months (range: 3.5—15.5 months] and 1.6
`months (range: 53—116 months). res
`'
`. The median
`survival was 8.1 months (range: 03-30.? months) and 15.9
`months (range: 1.8-8454- months].
`TheP'b'aeessmdyhadabifectminldeaignandcompamd
`the eficecy and safety ofTAXOL. administered at two dif-
`threat. doses (135 or 175 mgl'm') and mines (a. or 24.
`hour infusion]. The overall reapimae rate-for the 11-0? pa-
`tients was 16.2% (95% Cl: 12.8% to 20.2%) with 6 complete
`andfiOpsrtisIrespuoses.Durationofrespouse.mssured
`fromthefiretday oftrealrmentwas 8.3 montbelrange‘. 8.2—
`21.6 months). Median time to progression was 3.1 months
`(range 0.1+ - 251+ months). Median survival was 11.5
`months image: 0&231“ months].
`Reepmsemhamediansurrivalandmedienfimetopm—
`Mofortbesannemgiveninthetcllowingtahle.
`[Seetsbleaattepofnextpagel
`Analyses were performed as planned by the hifectoria]
`study design described in the protocol. by comparing the
`two doses (135 or 175 mgfmel irrespective ol'tbe schedule (3
`Wmmnlfl
`wzooommmmmmm
`
`33513311436
`Revised: September 1998
`
`TAXDLO
`Eton-all
`(petites-ll lnlecllon
`
`I} may
`
`WARNING
`mom (parlitaxell Injection should be administered
`under the supervision ol's physician experienced in the
`use of cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Appropriate
`management: nfcomplicetinne is possible only when Ill-
`equate diagnostic and treatment facilities are readily
`available.
`Amphylaxr's and severe hypersensitivity reactions char-
`acterised by dyapnea and hypetension requiring treat
`ment. angioerlenra, and
`'
`In‘ticsris have oc-
`curred in ”04% ofpatients receivingTAXOL in clinical
`trials. Fats] reactionahm occurred in patients despite
`pmmedieatiuu. All patients should be pretreated with
`corticosteroids. dipbenhydramine. and H, antagonists.
`(See MANDADWION section.) Pa-
`tients who experienm severe hypersensitivity relations
`te‘EAXOLehoaldmt herachallengedwith thedrug.
`TAXOL therapy should not be given to patients with
`solid hunters who have baseline neutropbil counts cfless
`than 1,500 cellsi’mlzu3 and should not be given to pa-
`tients with AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma if the base-
`lioeneuh‘cphilcoantisleesthan 1000wllahmn'.1nor~
`dsr to monitor the occurrence of bone marrow suppres—
`sion, primarily neotropenia, which may he more and
`result in infection. it is recommended that frequent pe-
`ripheral blood cell counts be performed on all patients
`
`receiving TAXOL.
`
`CIPLA EXHIBIT 1008
`Page 3 of 9
`
`

`

`PHYSICIANS' DESK REFERENCE®
`BBZIBHISTOLuMYERS SOUIBB ONCJIMM.
`
`Teach—Cont.
`‘Ihhh 2: Eifiucy in th- an... 3 FlrcI-Lln- oe-un Goldman Study
`
`3“
`
`0.04
`
`'
`0301
`
`30
`
`_
`
`'
`
`I
`JW
`Witch!“
`
`rufifil’]
`[W14]
`l1
`. Gilded flecpoms‘
`(11:113]
`(n=127]
`- rate (percent)
`62
`43 -
`- p—mlue
`' FWWIHI
`‘ ““75 (percent)
`. Maine
`' Pathological
`Complete Response
`16
`21
`020
`A utgllperoeut)
`‘
`”on
`.fimtz‘h
`130
`166
`i
`_ made.“ (months)
`'
`‘
`0 m
`_ p-vslue
`,
`. gm
`243
`355
`_ median (months!
`
`- pvalue
`0-0002
`' Among evalushie patients only.
`*Includos patients with pathological complete response plus patients with mimseopie residual disease.
`
`Table 3: Efficacy In the Phase 3 Second-Um Ovarian Carcinoma Study
`
`use
`Mail
`e
`145 -
`(3.5.23.6)
`4.4
`(3.0-5.6)
`
`- 1'8 m
`“Hug-E"
`m
`- 95% Confidence Interval
`'Emuprlmuucin
`. 95c Gonfidenns Idem:
`- sin-mu
`-
`10.7
`13.1
`1.1.8
`11.5
`_
`.mfijfin (months)
`
`- 95c chasm Interval
`[SA—HA)
`lac—24s}
`(9.14145)
`redirect
`that measured mlijacfive sasem'ment of treahnent. Ofthe
`TsflecEficscyinBrslclcenwaFsflunoflMdsl
`seven. the Lung Cancer Specific Symptoms subscale favored
`ChemothsrspynrwlthinBMonfluofAdjuvsntTlWy
`the MOL 135 mglm‘m hour plus cisplstin arm tampered
`to the cisciatinfetopcaide am. For all other factors. than
`was no disarm; in the moat-seizures:
`The adverse event profile for patients who. received TAXOL
`in combination with, cisphtin in H113 may was generally
`coexistent with that men hr ting pooled analysis nf_data
`frgmj 813 whats heated mth music-wt WDI- :21 10
`clinical studies. M 9‘1"” events “d adverse events
`3-0 m B" Pin" 3 hum" "SOLO. mid? are Mb“! in
`the EVE?“ REACgIONB m In tabular mm“ 5'
`ma“ “mm“, m-
`‘D m.
`1.32?“W ‘ 5'3”" {Emil “'9 P23”; 2
`rapy In patients with AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma.
`E - “1“ 3” “1’1”?" m“
`”m ‘ “e
`previously received systemic therapy: including interferon
`Iplpha (32%l.DaunoXomeOl31%i.D0mi2%l and dose-
`ruhicin containing chemotherapy (42%), with 64% having
`received prim- anflxracycllnes. Eighty-five percent ofthe pre-
`treated patients had progressed on, or cmald not tolerate,
`prior systemic therapy.
`In Study GA139-174 patients received TAXOLa‘t 135 main}:
`aaa3-ho1rrinfimonevery3weelrstintendeddeseinbansity
`«maim‘fweekl If no dues-limits? toxicity was chewed,
`patients were to receive 155 raglan and 175 made“ in sub
`sequent courses. Hemaoopcietic growth factors were not to
`he used initially. In Study 01:139-281. patients received
`m0]. (paclitexell Injection at 100 mom“ Is a 3-hour
`infusion every 2 weeks (intended dose intensity 50 mgl'm’J
`week) in this study patients could be receiving hematcpui-
`etic Wth fschnrs before theatartol’TAXOL therapy; or
`this support was to be initiated as indicated; the dues of
`TAXDL was not increased. The dose intensity of T8101;
`used in this patient population was lower than the dose in-
`tensity recommended for other solid tumors.
`
`.
`.
`oerhours] and the twoccheduleeu'reqsechvenfdnse. Ps-
`tients receiving the 175 mglnr’ dose had a response rate-
`sirsilsr to thatfor those receiving the 135 mgfm’ dose: 18%
`vs. 14% ($0.28). No difi’erenee in response rate was de-
`tested when comparing the Lhour with the 24-hour infu-
`aion: 15% vs. ”it (pm-0.50). Patients receiving the 175
`mgfnr' of TAXOL had a longer time to progression than
`those receiving the 135 mm“ dose: median 4.2 vs. 3.1
`months (gr-0.03). The median time to progression For pe-
`tients renewingthe 3-hour vs. the 24-hour infusion was 40
`months vs. 37 months. respectively. Median survival was
`11.6mmtheinpatienereeeiviugthemmc'm‘dmef
`TAXDL and 11.0 months in patients receiving the 135
`mgfm‘ dose [pr-0.92). Median survival was 11.7 months for
`patients receiving the 3-hour infusion OTTAXOL and 11.2
`months for patiepterecoiving the 24-hour infusion [H.911
`These mtisfical anaiysssshould beviewed with motion bfi-
`cause of the multiple comparisons made.
`TAXOL remained active in patients who had developed rev
`distance to plafinumeonteining therapy (defined as humor
`progessicu while an. or tumor relapse within 6 months
`Emu completion of. s plafinum-wutsifiugrngenlwilh re-
`sponssratesof14%inihePhaseSstudycnd 81%inthe
`Phase 1 s; 2 finial m
`The adverse event profile in this Phase 3 study was consis-
`sentwith emu; seenforthepoolad analysis graham 312
`mpafimwuwugmimdmzim.simme‘dm‘mzzlfi
`110me ' “abnormal-(1%.“ She d 10 and BEA-G
`on m
`.
`an
`an
`)
`mauve
`““1
`The results ofthe randomised study support the use 3f
`TAXOL tracheal} mm at doses at 135 to 175 mom .
`administered by a 3-hour intravenous infusion The same
`doses administered by some: inflision were more tmo'c.
`However, the study had insulficient power to determine
`whether a pertioslar dose and. schedule produced superior
`silicscy
`emu card-mm: Data from as psfisnta seemed in three
`Phase 2 open label studies and from 171 patients enrolled in
`- m3 -
`a Phase 3 rmdemiced study were available to support the
`. rite (percent)
`mars-axon in patients with met-satin: breast urcinumn.
`- p—valua
`Matron-n Warm—hostudieaware conductediu
`' W110 '0 HOMO“
`53 patients previously heated with smacimum ofone prior
`' "Nd-i“ [months]
`chemotherapeutic regimen. TAXOL was administered in
`' P‘V‘l‘“
`these two trials as a 24-hour infusion at initial doses (£250
`men‘twuhocsrmppumorzoodlp‘m‘.mm 'M'F'
`19-5
`11-7
`m. were amuse 01: 3mm wound 52c (951ml: 32%
`‘ ”9"“ (““9“)
`
`.
`to ms.) respectively. "The third rum 2 study was con-
`“Wam-
`0'3“
`ducted in extensively pron-sated patients who had failed so-
`thrscydine therapy and who had received a minimum of
`The adverse event profile ofthe psfients who received gin-
`two chemotherapy regimens forthsltreetment ofmataststic
`gle-egent TAXDL'in the Phase 3 study was mneistent with
`disease. The dose armor. was 200 m“ as a 24-hour
`that seen for the pooled analysis of data from 312 patisnita
`trestedinmclinicslatudiee.'i'hesesdverseeventsand ad-
`infusion with G-CSF support. Nine of the 30 patients
`vereeeventsfromthePhasthrsastcarsinmnaatndym
`achieved. a partial responae,‘l'or a response rate (£305: [355:
`CI: “Ha-50%).
`described in the ADVERSE REACHONS’sectienin tabu-
`lar (Tables 3 and 11) and narrative firm
`Phase 3 random caddy—This multioenter trial was con-
`Non-Small M Long carcinoma {nectar—In a Phase 3
`ducted in patients previously treated with one or two regi-
`open label randomized study conducted by the Eastern 00‘
`mensofchemotherapy. Patients were randomised in receive
`TAXOL at adoseofeither l’l'fi raglanx or 135m9‘rn' given as
`operative Oncology Group (EC-06). 599:pstients were ran-
`despised to sifller‘EAXOLlT) lSlintgfm’ as u‘M—hourint'u-
`a 8-hour infusion. In the d'l'l patents enrolled. 90% had
`aim in combination with cisplstm In) 75 mgt‘ma, MOI; [Tl
`symptomatic disease with impaired performance stands at
`260 m3 as a 24-hourinfusins'In combination with cisple
`study may. and 78% had visceral metastases. These pa-
`shin (c) 1'5 ramp” with G-CSF supwrt. or cisplsfin (El 15
`tients had failed prior chemotherapy either in the adiuvant
`mg'm’ on day 1 followed by etcposide WP) 100 night:3 on
`setting (30%), the metastatic setting (35%). or hot-ll (315).
`days 1. 2. and3 (control)
`Sixtyseren percent oft-he patients had been previously ex-
`Response rates. median time to progression. median cur:
`viva1.and one-year survival rates are given in the following
`poeedooanthracyclinessndfi‘hm‘thamhnddisessemn—
`sidsred resistant to this class of agents
`table. The reported [2--values have not been adjusted for
`mulfipie comparisons There were statistically significant
`The overall response rate fortho 454 evaluable patients was
`difi‘erenms favor-ingest]: ofths TAXOL plus cicplntin arms
`26% (95% CI: W013}. with 17 complete and 9!) partial
`ferrecponse mteandfimetetumorprcgression Thur-ewes
`responses. The medlsnduretionorl‘response. measuredfi'om
`no statistically significant Maroone'in survival between ei-
`thewfiratdsy oftreatment, was B. 1. months (ranger3.4—13.1+
`months). Overall for the 411 patients,_the median time to
`ther IIEMEOL plus eisplatin arm and the cisplatin plus eta-
`wes3.5 menthslnsng‘e:003—17.lmonthsl.ide-
`poside am
`[See table El below]
`dian survival was 11.7 months (range: 0-189 months)
`In the ECDG studs; the Functional Assessment of'Canoer
`Responserates. median survival and median time to pro-
`Therapy—Lung (FACIAL) questionnaire had seven subsonic:
`gression forthszn-msaregiveninthefollowisgtshle
`Tabl-§:EfiuscyPsmmsinmsPhus3Hm-Lhem9hpdy
`
`.1131,
`
`IE...
`
`.
`
`'
`
`22
`
`23
`
`4-2
`
`11.135
`
`0927
`
`c
`“3:“
`‘53:”
`“32°.
`
`{mm
`mm"
`mI
`
`'
`
`_
`
`_'
`
`_
`
`. gm
`23
`25
`- rate (Wt)
`- <om1
`0,001
`— p-Vflluei
`'
`' 11'". W W“
`4.9
`4.3
`. median {months}
`0.0M
`0.05
`- p-vslae"
`. Survival
`1.10
`s_3
`- median (months)
`p-Vhluoh
`012
`(L08
`43¢»st surVMI
`‘
`-
`
`. percent ofpatients
`'
`'
`36
`4,0
`.
`52
`‘Etoposide (VP) roomful was cdmmistered IV. on days 1 2 and s.
`I’Couppared to eisplafinlelspceide.
`Mnmhwww.mwflHm
`
`1:2
`
`-
`
`2::
`
`14
`
`use:
`ln=1flfil
`.
`21 7
`(14.5—31.0)
`4.2
`(3.5—5.1)
`
`13513
`{RIBS}
`.
`152
`(so-ecu
`3.4.
`{2.3—4.3}
`
`135m
`(M131
`.
`132
`11.7—21.5)
`' as
`(1.9-4.0)
`
` Fifiy—nincafthe 85 patients enrolledinthese studies had
`
`DuanoanneO is a registered iradsmsrk queKs‘lar Phnrv
`maeeuficals, Inc. DOXILD'1e a'rey'stered trademark olSe-
`quus Pharmaceuticals. Inc
`Allpatientshad widespread and pom-risk.dicesse Applying
`the A011} staging miter-is to patients wi‘lh prior systemic
`therapy. 93% were poor risk for extent ufiiisense”11.38%
`had s cm count <soo eelLy'mm‘ (1.), and one hadpoor risk
`considering their systemic illness 65;).
`All petisnts in Study cumin had a Ksrnoi'slq pursue
`msnee ststus orl'Bil or 90 at baseline:in Study CA1“281,
`status of 70
`there were 26 (-16%) patients wim a Kamofsky perform-anal
`w m ”i W'
`Tshlo a: Ext-m at III-nus at Study Em
`P-wfl_.__ of I'm
`. Prior Symplc
`
`Mr
`"“591
`42
`Visceral 1 edema : oral .t
`cutaneous
`41
`Edemsorlymphnodesm-al:
`10
`.
`03mm
`
`Cum-nun only
`' 7
`
`CIPLA EXHIBIT 1008
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`CIPLA EXHIBIT 1008
`Page 4 of 9
`
`

`

`
`
`BRISTOL-MYERS SOUIBB ONCflMMJm
`PRODUCT INFORMATION
`
`Hmoughmeplannsddoaaintensityinthstwoehulieswea
`MOI. infusion. is recommded. Continuous cud-in: monv
`mm a Java} moo callefmmablm m3 for pc-
`tielriewitb KSlendplslsleteml-oalevelflflflflm
`itofingisnotrequiradexcaptforpnfiantswifli seriouscnn-
`slightly difierent (is mgfmliweek'In Study cares-11¢ and
`ducfion abnormalities {Sea WARNINGS section.)
`cellsI'mIn’.
`50 main.(week'in Study 05139-281). delivered does intsn
`Severe condudion abnormalities have been decimated in
`aity mammimkumm. withasimilar
`Menu System: Although. the oecnrrenee'oi' peripheral
`<1firnl’pationts dufingTAXOLfiienpyandinsmeceses
`range (20-24 to 51-61).
`nsmpsfilyisfi'eqoant. thedsvslnpmant efasvsre syrup-
`EMcscr—Tbs eficas'y ol' TAXOL was evaluated by assess-
`waiting pacemaker placement pratisnts develop signifi-
`hematologyisnnususlandrequiresedoscrcducfianofm
`ingcutsneoustumorrespoacesccoodingtnthesmended
`cant conduction abnormalities during TAXOL interim. ep-
`for all subsequent com-ass of'I‘itXOL.
`ACPG criteria and by seekiogev'idsucsofclininsl hensfitin
`proprisla therapy should be administered and continuous
`TAXOL contains dehydreted alcohol USP, 396nigh-1L;eon
`cardiac monitoring should he performed during subsequent
`patients in six domains ofsymptoms andl'cr conditions that
`airlaratinn should be giventn poan‘hle C'NSand nthersll'ects
`are commonly related toms-related Kaposi’s sarcoma.
`therapy with TAXOL.
`ofaloohoi. [Sea PRECAUTIONS: Pam Us. section.)
`Cutaneous Tumor Reasons. Marauder! am ml—
`Pregnancy: TAXOL can cause fetal harm whaoadminis-
`Hepatic: There isevidence that the toxicity oiTAXOL is en-
`Tbsclfiartivsreaponsoratammwrs‘km: 46% to 72%]
`bored to a pregnant woman. Administration oi psclitaxsl
`hanced in patients with elevated liver
`. Caution
`duringtheperiodcforgauogsaesistnrabbite atdoeesofan
`(35 offi? patients) in patients with prior systemic therapy.
`should beamercised when administering moms patients
`Cutaneous responses were p '
`'
`defined as fiatteningqf
`sty (about i).2 the daily maximum recommended hu-
`with moderate to severe hepatic impairment and dose ad-
`more than 50% of previously raised lednns.
`man does on aroglma basis) mused embryo- and fetotozcicity,
`justments should be considered.
`lniaetlcm 8h- flas

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket