throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`
`ZTE (USA) INC.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
` AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`FUNDAMENTAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`___________________
`
`IPR2018-00111
`Patent No. 8,624,550
`___________________
`
`
`
` FUNDAMENTAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL LLC'S
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`JASON S. SHEASBY UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(C)
`
`
`
`Mail Stop "PATENT BOARD"
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`10456690
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00111
`Patent 8,624,550
`
`
`
`I.
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and the Board's "Order Authorizing Motion
`
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission – 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)," in Case IPR2013-00639,
`
`Paper 7, entered October 15, 2013, incorporated by Paper 8 in the present case,
`
`Patent Owner Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC, ("Fundamental
`
`Innovation"), by and through its attorneys, respectfully requests that the Board admit
`
`Jason G. Sheasby pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`II.
`
`GOVERNING LAW, RULES, AND PRECEDENT
`
`Section 42.10(c) states as follows:
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a
`proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the
`condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner and
`to any other conditions as the Board may impose. For
`example, where the lead counsel is a registered
`practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel
`who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon
`showing that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney
`and has an established familiarity with the subject matter
`at issue in the proceeding.
`
`III.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`Based on the following statement of facts, and supported by the Declaration
`
`of Jason G. Sheasby submitted herewith, Fundamental Innovation submits that a
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00111
`Patent 8,624,550
`showing of good cause has been made and respectfully requests the pro hac vice
`
`
`
`
`
`admission of Jason G. Sheasby in this proceeding:
`
`1.
`
`Patent Owner’s lead counsel, Hong Zhong, is a registered practitioner
`
`(Reg. No. 66,530). First back-up counsel, Michael R. Fleming, is also
`
`a registered practitioner (Reg. No. 67,933).
`
`2. Mr. Sheasby is a Partner at the law firm of Irell & Manella LLP.
`
`3. Mr. Sheasby is an experienced litigating attorney and has been
`
`litigating cases relating to patents for over 17 years.
`
`4. Mr. Sheasby is a member in good standing of the California State Bar.
`
`5. Mr. Sheasby has never been suspended or disbarred from practice
`
`before any court or administrative body.
`
`6.
`
`No application filed by Mr. Sheasby for admission to practice before
`
`any court or administrative body has ever been denied.
`
`7.
`
`No sanctions or contempt citations have been imposed against Mr.
`
`Sheasby by any court or administrative body.
`
`8. Mr. Sheasby has read and agrees to comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in
`
`part 42 of the C.F.R.
`
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00111
`Patent 8,624,550
`9. Mr. Sheasby understands that he will be subject to the USPTO Rules of
`
`
`
`
`
`Professional Conduct 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary
`
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`10. Mr. Sheasby has appeared and been granted pro hac vice admission in
`
`three inter partes reviews (IPR2012-00033, IPR2013-00242, and
`
`IPR2014-001567) before the United States Patent and Trademark
`
`Office.
`
`11. Mr. Sheasby has an established familiarity with the subject matter at
`
`issue in this proceeding. Mr. Sheasby has acquired substantial
`
`understanding of the underlying legal and technological issues at stake
`
`in related proceedings. Patent Owner has expended significant time and
`
`resources with Mr. Sheasby and wishes to continue using Mr. Sheasby
`
`as counsel in this proceeding as appropriate.
`
`
`
`IV.
`
`GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`JASON G. SHEASBY
`
`The facts outlined above in the Statement of Facts, and contained in the
`
`Declaration of Jason G. Sheasby (Ex. 2007), establish that there is good cause to
`
`admit Mr. Sheasby pro hac vice in this proceeding under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10. Patent
`
`Owner's lead counsel and first back-up counsel are registered practitioners. Mr.
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00111
`Patent 8,624,550
`Sheasby is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established familiarity with
`
`
`
`
`
`the subject matter at issue.
`
`V.
`
`NO OPPOSITION TO THEIR MOTION
`
`Patent Owner has conferred with Petitioner with regard to its Motion, and
`
`Petitioner confirmed that it would not oppose the motion.
`
`
`
`VI.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`In light of the foregoing, Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`admit Jason G. Sheasby pro hac vice in their proceeding.
`
`
`
`Dated: February 27, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Hong Zhong
`
`
`
`
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Hong Zhong, Reg. No. 66,530
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 900
`Los Angeles CA 90067
`Tel: (310) 203-7183
`Fax: (310) 556-5385
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner,
`Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00111
`Patent 8,624,550
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, the undersigned certifies that on February 27,
`
`
`
`2018, a copy of the foregoing document "FUNDAMENTAL INNOVATION
`
`SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL LLC'S AMENDED UNOPPOSED MOTION
`
`FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF JASON G. SHEASBY UNDER 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.10(C)" was served by electronic mail, as agreed to by the parties, upon
`
`the following:
`
`
`Charles M. McMahon
`Hersh H. Mehta
`Gregory S. Arovas
`Robert A. Appleby
`Todd M. Friedman
`Eugene Goryunov
`Alan Rabinowitz
`cmcmahon@mwe.com
`hmehta@mwe.cm
`greg.arovas@kirkland.com
`robert.appleby@kirkland.com
`todd.friedman@kirkland.com
`eugene.gorvunov@kirkland.com
`alan.rabinowitz@kirkland.com
`
`
`
`
`/s/Susan M. Langworthy/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket