throbber
ANNALS 0 THE N W Y RK A AD MY
`
`EN ES
`
`VOLUME 147, ART. 1 8
`
`PAGES 687 -7 52
`
`October 30, 1969
`
`Editorial Director
`pETER D. ALBERTSON
`
`Editor-in-Chief
`MARC KRAUSS
`
`Managing Editor
`MARJORIE A. MUSIL
`
`AORTIC VALVE DISEASE:
`
`CHANGING CONCEPTS IN ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT*
`
`CONTENTS
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 689
`Introduction. By GEORGE H. HUMPHREYS II, M.D.
`Contour Spectral Phonocardiography in the Assessment of Aortic Valve Disease. By
`WILLIAM M. ROGERS, Ph.D., JAMES S. HARRISON, M.D., AND STANLEY
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 690
`BLANCHARD, B.E.E.
`Pathophysiological Considerations in Aortic Valve Disease. By JOHN 0. BURRIS,
`M.D., FREDERICK L. MAZER, M.D., AND GERARD M. TURINO, M.D ..... . 716
`Obstruction of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract: Roentgenographic and Angiocar-
`diographic Features. By KENT ELLIS , M.D . .. . ... ... .... . ....... .. .. 725
`Results of Aortic Valve Replacement Utilizing Irradiated Valve Homografts. By
`JAMES R. MALM, M.D., FREDERICK 0. BOWMAN, JR., M.D., PAUL D.
`HARRIS, M.D ., GERARD A. KAISER, M.D., AND A.T.W. KOVAL! K, M.D .. .. 740
`Postoperative Management of Arrhythmias and Low Cardiac Output in Patients
`Undergoing Aortic Valve Surgery. By P.D. HARRIS, M.D., F.O. BOWMAN, M.D.,
`B.F. HOFFMAN, M.D ., G.A. KAISER, M.D., J.R. MALM, M.D ., AND D.
`. ....... .. ..... . ............................ 748
`SINGER, M.D.
`
`*These papers are the result of a symposium entitled Aortic Val11e Disease: Changing
`Concepts in Assessment and Management, held by the Section of Biological and Medical
`Sciences of The New York Academy of Sciences on January 15, 1968.
`NEW YORK
`PUBLISHED BY THE ACADEMY
`
`STJUDE1028
`IPR of Patent No. 6,821,297
`
`

`

`Copyright, 1969, by Tile New Ym·k Academy of Sciences. All rigllts reserved. Except for
`brief q11otations by reviewers, reprocl11ction of tllis p11blicatio11 in whole or in part by any
`means whatever is strictly prohibited witllo11 t written pemzission from the publisller.
`
`STJUDE1028
`IPR of Patent No. 6,821,297
`
`

`

`PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN AORTIC
`VALVE DISEASE*
`
`JOHN 0. BURRIS, M.D. , FREDERICK L. MAZER, M.D.,t AND
`GERARD M. TURINO ,_M.D.:~
`
`Cardiovasculm· LaboratOJy of The Presbyterian Hospital,
`Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons,
`Columbia University, New York, N. Y.
`
`The aortic valve, situated as it is, between the outflow tract of the left
`ventricle and the aorta, plays a vital role in cardiovascular function. By holding
`tl1e head of pressure generated by left ventricular contraction, it maintains high
`aortic pressure with relatively small fluctuations favoring continuous perfusion
`of the peripheral tissues. With the head of pressure in the aorta maintained, the
`left ventricle can operate in short bursts of activity (systole) with relatively long
`periods of rest between bursts (diastole). During diastole the left ventricular
`pressure can fall to low levels, the tension in the myocardium is reduced, and
`coronary flow is favored; also ventricular filling occurs with the maintenance of
`a low pressure pulmonary circulation. Diseases which affect tl1e aortic valve
`restrict its opening (stenosis) or cause it to leak during diastole (insufficiency) or
`a combination of tl1ese two.
`The design of the aortic valve with tluee nearly hemi~pheric cusps is uniquely
`suited to its function. The concavity of the cusps, as seen from the aortic side,
`distlibutes the pressure in such a way that lateral pressure along the free
`opposing edges provides mutual support and a tight seal. The tluee cusps oppose
`each other along three radial lines of contact which trisect the aortic lumen in a
`plane perpendicular to the long axis of the aorta. The total free edge of any
`single cusp is tlms equal to twice the radius of the aortic orifice. The three cusps
`provide a total free edge equal in length to six times the radius of the aortic
`orifice which is, in turn, approximately equal to the circumference of the aortic
`orifice. When the valve is open, tl1ere is just enough length of free edge of tl1e
`cusps to fit snugly against the aortic wall. No otl1er number of cusps would allow
`such a perfect accommodation to the aortic lumen during both opening and
`closing. The majority of cases of congenital valvular aortic stenosis are associated
`with an abnormal number of cusps, most frequently two (Edwards, 1965). In
`aortic stenosis in the adult population, it is becoming recognized tl1at bicuspid
`valves occur most frequently as a predisposing abnormality. Even in rheumatic
`disease of the aortic valve, it is likely that fusion of one of the commissures by
`the inflammatory process produces a bicuspid valve which leads to progressive
`obstruction of the valve. Since a biscuspid valve cannot open fully, the free edges
`will be stretched across the aortic orifice during systolic ejection and set into
`rapid vibration. This trauma can lead to fibrosis, thickening, fusion, and eventual
`calcification of tjle leaflets.
`The progressive nature of aortic stenosis can be seen in FIGURE 1, which
`shows a positive correlation between patients' age and tl1e severity of the valve
`
`*Supported in part by U.S.P.H.S. Grant HE-0574-1.
`tTrainee in Cardiology of the National Institute of Health under Grant HE-05443.
`:):Career Investigator at the Health l<.esearch Council of the City of New York under
`Grant 1-182.
`
`716
`
`STJUDE1028
`IPR of Patent No. 6,821,297
`
`

`

`Burris et al.: Pathologi al Considera tiDns
`200 -
`
`•
`
`717
`
`PEAK
`SYSTOLIC
`GRADIENT
`mmt-IQ
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`ct
`
`r=+0.68
`P=<.OI
`
`10
`
`20
`
`50
`40
`30
`AGE IN YEARS
`
`60
`
`70
`
`80
`
`PIGURE 1. The relationship between patient's age and severity of aortic stenosis as
`reflected by the peak systolic pressure gradient.
`
`their deleterious effects by
`
`obstruction, as measured by the pressure gradient across the valve during systolic
`ejection.
`insufficiency produce
`Aortic stenosis and
`overloading the left ventricle.
`As can be seen in FIGURE 2, aortic stenosis, .by causing obstruction of left
`ventricular emptying, results in an increase in ventricular pressure. A pressure
`difference is developed across the aortic valve which is proportional to the
`severity of the obstruction and the rate of blood flow during systole. The total
`left ventricular work* is proportional to the area under the left ventricular
`pressure curve. The effective work (the actual aortic mean pressure times the
`volume ejected) is roughly propmtional to the area under the aortic curve. The
`shaded area is therefore proportional to the pathological work load imposed by
`the resistance to flow.
`In the case of aortic insufficiency (FIGURE 3) an increased work load is also
`present. During diastole a certain fraction of the ejected stroke volume leaks
`back into the left ventricle. In order to maintain a normal forward flow, each
`stroke volume must be increased by whatever amount returns by diastolic
`leakage to the left ventricle. The amount of blood which regurgitates during
`diastole is the critical index of the severity of the aortic valve abnormality. The
`actual regurgitant volume may be very great, approaching 75-85% of the total
`
`*The calculation here includes that work clone on the left ventricle by th e righ l ventricle
`and left atrium in filling the left ventricle.
`
`STJUDE1028
`IPR of Patent No. 6,821,297
`
`

`

`71 8
`
`Annals New York Aca demy of Sciences
`
`GH61 yrs. d1
`
`TOTAL LV WO I< 11. 5Kg- M/ Min
`EFFECTIVE LV WO K 5.2 KrM/Min
`%TOTAL LV WORK WAS
`055°1.
`
`PRESSURE
`mmHg
`
`200
`
`160
`
`120
`
`eo
`
`40
`
`0
`
`i.l~
`
`TIME
`
`I
`I ·
`
`FIGURE 2. Distribution of cardiac pressure work in a patient with severe aortic stenosis.
`Left ventricle (LV) and left brachial artery (LBA) pressures are recorded. The electro-
`cardiogram (EKG) is standard lead II. Work is calculated as total LV pressure work.
`Effective work is work resulting in forward blood flow. The shaded area under the LV
`pressure pulse is proportional to the work wasted in overcoming the obstruction to outflow.
`
`left ventricular output (Frank eta/., 1967; Brawley & Morrow, 1967). The
`ventricle mus-t dilate to acconm10date such greatly increased stroke volumes.
`With an increase in ventricular volume, and therefore diameter, the myocardial
`tension required to develop a given systolic pressure increases directly according
`to the Law of La Place (Katz, 1965). The ventricle in aortic insufficiency must
`meet an immense volume overload and, in addition , deliver it at the expense of
`increased myocardial wall tension.
`It is apparent from the preceding that aortic valve abnormalities chronically
`stress the left ventricle and cause it to hypertrophy. The mechanisms by which
`the myocardium is able to adjust to its work ·load have been recently and
`concisely summarized (Braunwald et a!., 1967). After years of overwork,
`eventually, the heart relies more heavily on its ability to increase work when its
`filling pressure , i.e., its end-diastolic pressure is increased (the Frank-Starling
`mechanism). The left atrium (FIGURE 4) provides an effective increase in
`end-diastolic pressure by its contraction immediately before ventricular systole.
`This timing of a trial con traction allows an increase in ventricular end-diastolic
`pressure which may far exceed the left atrial and pulmonary venous mean
`pressure. This mechanism allows ventricular filling while protecting the
`pulmonary capillary bed from reaching levels of mean pressure which could
`result in the transudation of fluid into the interstitium and alveoli. Unfortu- ·
`na tely , this compensation by the left atrium is Hmited; during exercise or other
`stresses, further increases in filling pressure induce higher levels of pulmonary
`
`STJUDE1028
`IPR of Patent No. 6,821,297
`
`

`

`Burris eta/.: Pathological Considerations
`
`719
`
`MM 44yrs.J
`
`EFFECTIVE EXTERNAL WORI<(LV)=I0.7 1<g- M/ Min
`TOTAL EXTERNAL WORK(LV)=I6.5Kg- I\1/Min
`ASSU~11NG 35% REGURGITATION
`
`L.V.----7AORTA
`
`200
`
`180
`
`160
`
`140
`
`120
`
`100
`80
`60
`
`PRESSURE
`mmH9
`
`o~!t­
`O.I Gee
`
`TIME
`
`FIGURE 3. Distribution of cardiac work in a patient with moderate aortic insufficiency.
`The pressure curve was recorded as a cardiac catheter was withdrawn from the left ventricle
`(LV) to the aorta. Effective work is that work resulting in forward blood flow. Total work is
`work perfonned in ejecting that blood which flows to the peripheral tissues (forward blood
`flow) plus the blood which regurgitates back into the ventricle with each diastole. The small
`arrow indicates the level of left ventricular filling pressure. The degree of aortic insufficiency
`was estimated from angiocardiography.
`
`l.O. 47yrs.d'
`
`110
`
`100
`90
`80
`70
`PRESSURE 60
`mmHo
`50
`
`40
`30
`20
`
`10
`0
`
`~f+-
`O.lsec
`
`TIME
`
`FIGURE 4. Left atrial tnmsport function in a patient with aortic stenosis. Left
`·ventricular filling pressure is high relative to left atrial mean pressure because of vigorous left
`atrial cmitraction immediately prior to left ventricular contraction.
`
`STJUDE1028
`IPR of Patent No. 6,821,297
`
`

`

`720
`
`Annals New York Academy of Sciences
`
`40
`
`30
`
`LEFT VENTRICULAR
`END DIASTOLIC 20
`PflESSURE
`rnmHg
`
`•
`
`20
`
`40
`
`140
`120
`100
`80
`60
`PEAK SYSTOLIC PRESSURE GRADIENT
`mmHg
`
`160
`
`reo
`
`200
`
`FIGURE 5. The relationship between left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and the
`severity of aortic stenosis as reflected by the peak systolic gradient across the aortic valve in
`37 patients with aortic stenosis.
`
`PEA K
`SYSTOLIC
`GRADIENT
`mmHg
`
`200
`
`180
`
`160
`
`140
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`4 0
`
`20
`
`0
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`• •
`
`•
`•
`
`• •
`
`•
`
`r=-0.23
`p=>.05
`
`•
`•
`
`2
`
`4
`3
`CARDIAC INDEX
`L/Min/M2
`
`•
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`FIG URE 6. The relationship between cardiac index and severity of aortic stenosis as
`reflected by the peak systolic pressure gradient.
`
`STJUDE1028
`IPR of Patent No. 6,821,297
`
`

`

`Burris eta/.: Pathological Considerations
`72 1
`capillary pressure, and the patient, characteristically, complafns of dyspnea as his
`lungs become congested and edematous.
`In addition, patients with aortic valve disease frequently complain of angina
`pectoris. While this has usually been thought to occur from an hypertrophied
`left ventricular muscle mass without a concomitant capillary growth, this
`concept has been challenged (Linzbach, 1960) by the demonstration of an
`increase in coronary capillary density proportional to the increase in number and
`size of myocardial cells. While some .of the patients with angina may have
`coexisting coronary arteriosclerosis, many, as shown recently by FaUen eta!.
`(1967), do not, and these authors therefore suggested some abnormality in the
`autoregulation of coronary blood Oow.
`From the foregoing it is suggested that, whereas the structural abnormality of
`the aortic valve induces the hemodynamic stress, the clinical condition of a
`particular patient depends on the competence of his left ventricle. The decision
`to surgically correct the diseased valve is approached by defining the severity of
`the hemodynamic abnormality of the aortic valve by catheterization of the left
`heart which can also provide some assessment of left ventricular function. To
`illustrate
`this problem in hemodynamics, the authors have chosen to use
`catheterization data from 37 randomly selected cases of isolated aortic stenosis
`from the files of the Cardiovascular Laboratory of the Columbia-Presbyterian
`Medical Center. Of the standard measurement made at the time of cardiac
`
`•
`• •
`
`8
`
`7
`
`6
`
`5
`
`CARDIAC
`INDEX
`4
`L/Min/M2
`
`3
`
`2
`
`r=-0.42
`p= <.01
`
`30
`20
`10
`LEFT VENTRICULAR END DIASTOLIC PRESSURE
`mmHQ
`
`40
`
`FIGURE 7. The relationship between left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (a rough
`index of ventricular function) and cardiac output in 37 patients with aortic stenosis.
`
`STJUDE1028
`IPR of Patent No. 6,821,297
`
`

`

`722
`
`Annals New York Academy of Sciences
`
`B~J
`
`500
`
`400
`
`PULMONARY
`VASCULAR
`RESISTANCE INDEX 300
`Oyou Sec cm-5/~
`
`200
`
`100
`
`. . . .
`
`/
`/.
`
`r=+0.47
`P=<.OI
`
`o~----~------~------~------~---
`10
`20
`30
`40
`LEFT VENTRICULAR END DIASTOLIC PRESSURE
`mmH~
`
`FIGURE 8. The relationship between pulmonary vascular resistance and left ventricular
`filling pressure (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure) in patients with aortic stenosis.
`
`cathetedzation, the level of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LYEDP) may
`be a helpful reflection of left ventricular functional capacity. However, care
`must be taken in the interpretation of LVEDP (Braunwald & Ross, 1963) as it is
`a function of the pressure volume characteristic of a given ventricle which may
`itself be influenced by a number of humoral and intrinsic myocardial factors.
`But the level of LVEDP in a patient with significant aortic valve disease does
`correlate well with
`the severity of his symptoms and is, in fact,
`the
`hemodynamic abnormality responsible for his dyspnea. When LVEDP is plotted
`against peak systolic gradient (FIGURE 5 ), a significant. positive correlation is
`seen. A few cases with marked pressure gradients have a low LVEDP, suggesting
`their left ventricle is tolerating its load reasonably well. In these cases, exercise
`or some other added stress, such as systemic hypertension induced by
`angiotension infusion (Perloff et al., 1967), might reveal a degree of functional
`compromise. Cardiac output is a less reliable measure of ventricular function
`partly because so many factors other than myocardial performance are involved
`in its regulation. When cardiac output, as cardiac index (Cl), is plotted against
`peak systolic gradient (FIGURE 6) and LVEDP (FIGURE 7), a greater scatter of
`results is seen. There is no significant correlation between CI and LVEDP, and a
`poor correlation between aortic pressure gradient and Cl.
`
`f ..,
`
`STJUDE1028
`IPR of Patent No. 6,821,297
`
`

`

`Burris eta/. : Pathological Considerations
`723
`Pulmonary artery pressure is usually normal in patients with isolated aortic
`stenosis as can be seen when LVEDP is plotted against the pulmonary vascular
`resistance index (PVRJ) (FIGURE 8). Most of the patients' resistan ces lie in the
`normal range , which is· rather surprising in view of the frequently marked
`elevation of left atrial pressure (which follows relatively closely LVEDP).
`Published resistances in patients with mitral stenosis with comparable elevations
`of left atrial pressure have higher PVRl's (Curti eta/., 1953 · Araujo & Lukas,
`1952; Yu eta!., 1954).

`The level of systolic pressure gradient is most meaningful if the rate of blood
`flow is also determined. Hence cardiac output, although a poor measure of
`ventricular function , must also be known to assess adequately the severity of
`valve obstruction. Aortic valve orifice area can be calculated (Gorlin & Gorlin ,
`1951) and is valuable since it takes into account gradient, flow, and heart rate,
`even though its accuracy has been questioned.
`In summary, the aortic valve is an important structure masterfuUy designed.
`When the structure is disturbed by an ernbryological Inisadventure or by an
`acquired disease , a heavy burden is placed on the left ventricle. The ventricle has
`surprising ability to adjust to the burden, and symptoms appear only when the
`pressure volume characteristics of the left ventricle become substantially at tered
`and maintenance of ventricular function depends on higher and higher levels of
`filling pressure, which may not occur until the sixth or seventh decade. To
`understand where a.given patient is in this continuum requires that the severity
`of the valve abnormality , whether obstruction or leakage be measured and that
`the functional capacity of the left ventricle be studied. The nee d for better
`means
`to study the
`latter points
`the way for future work and clearer
`understanding of the pathophysiology of heart disease.
`
`References
`ARAUJO , J. & D.S. LUKAS. 1952.
`Interrelationships among pulmonary "capillary"
`pressure, blood flow and valve size in mitral stenosis. The Umitecl regulatory effects
`of the pulmonary vascular resistance. J. Clin. Invest. 31: 1082.

`BRAUNWALD, E. & J. ROSS, JR. 1963. Editorial. The ventricular end-diastolic pressure.
`An appraisal of its value in the recognition of ventricular failure in man. Am. J. ivied.
`34: 137.
`BRAUNWALD, E., J. ROSS, JR. & E.H. SONNENJ3LICK. 1967. Mechanisms of contraction
`of the normal and failing heart. New Eng. J. Med. 277: 794 ,853,910,962.
`BRAWLEY , R.K. & A.G. MORROW. 1965. Direct determination of aortic blood flow in
`patients With aortic ref,'ltrgitation. Circulation 32: 871.
`CURTI, P.C., G. COHEN , B. CASTLEMAN , J.G. SCANNELL, A.L. rRIEDLICH & G.S.
`MEYERS. 1953. Respiratory and circulatory studies of patients with mitral stenosis.
`Circulation 8: 893.
`EDWARDS, J.E. 1965. Pathology of left ventricular outflow tract obstn1ction . Circulation
`31:586.
`FALLEN, E.L., W.C. ELLIOTT & R. GORLIN. 1967. Mechanisms of angina in aortic
`stenosis. Circulation 36: 480.
`FRANK, M.J., P. CASANEGRA, M. NADINI, A.J. MIGLIORI & G.E. LEVINSON. 1967.
`Measurement of aortic regurgitation by upstream sampling with continuous ii1fusion
`of indicator. Circulation 33: 545.
`GORLIN, R. & S.G. GORLIN. 1951. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the
`stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves and central circulatory shunts. Am. Heart J.
`41: 1.
`KATZ, A.M. 1965. Editorial. The descending limb of U1e Starling curve and th?e Tailing
`heart. Circulation 32: 871.
`
`STJUDE1028
`IPR of Patent No. 6,821,297
`
`

`

`724
`
`Annals New York Academy of Sciences
`
`LINZI3ACH A.J . 1960. He;ul failure from the point of view of quantitative n.nato my. Am.
`J. Cru-d iology 5: 370.
`PERLOrf<', J. K., P.F. I3INNION , \V.H. AULriELD & A.C. DeLEON, JR. 1967. T he use of
`angiotension in the assessment of left vcntricuJ;u function in fix ed orifice aortic
`. s te~1 osis. Circulation 35 : 34 7.
`YU, P.N., J.I-1. SIMPSON, F.\V. LOVEJOY, JR. , H.S. JOOS & R.E. NYE, JR. 1954. Studies
`or pulmonary hypertension IV. Pu lmon ary circulatory dynamics in patient with
`mit ral stenosis at rest. Am. Heart J. 47: 330.
`
`STJUDE1028
`IPR of Patent No. 6,821,297
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket