throbber
International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 18 (1984) 201-205 (cid:9)
`Elsevier
`
`201
`
`1JP 00607
`
`The effect of anionic surfactants on the release of
`chlorpheniramine from a polymer matrix tablet
`
`P.B. Daly, S.S. Davis an.: J.W. Kennerley *
`Department of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham. University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD and
`* R.P. Scherer b4 Frankland R0124 Blagrove, Swindon, Wiltshire SN5 8YS (U.K)
`(Received January 27th, 1983)
`(Modified version received July 14th, 1983)
`(Accepted July 19th, 1983)
`
`Matrix tablets have long been used to obtain sustained drug delivery and it was
`Higuchi (1963) who first presented a detailed mathematical analysis of such release.
`Bamba et al. (1979) further developed the mechanisms of release fri. matrix
`systems that swell at the tablet periphery to form a gel which acts as a barrier to
`drug diffusion.
`It is becoming increasingly apparent that the viscosity characteristics of the
`polymers, that go to make the matrix tablet, are of great importance in determining
`the final release properties of the dosage form. Huber and Christensen (1968), when
`investigating the release of a tracer (tartrazine) from two hydroxypropyl methylcel-
`lulose (HPMC) matrix tablets, found that the higher viscosity grade HPMC released
`the tracer at a significantly slower rate than the lower grade. More recently Nakano
`et al. (1983) studied the release of theophylline from hydroxypropyl cellulose tablets;
`here again the rate .of release was slower for the higher viscosity grades. The
`sustained drug release from these two systems is achieved by the polymer swelling to
`a gel-like consistency at the tablet periphery and forming a barrier to drug diffusion.
`Harwood and Schwartz (1982), when investigating the release of pilocarpine from
`ophthalmic HPMC matrix preparations also found the release to be slower from the
`higher viscosity grades. The present study firstly concerns the release of chlo-
`rpheniramine from tablets made from 4 different viscosity grades of HPMC and
`secondly the effect of an anionic surfactant, sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS), on drug
`release from HPMC tablets.
`Tablets of nominal weight, 300 mg containing 45 mg chloipheniramine maleate,
`mere prepared using an instrumented Manesty F3 machine, fitted with 10 mm
`diameter flat-faced punches and die, at an upper punch compaction pressure of 175
`
`Correspondence; S.S. Davis, Department of Pharmacy. University of Nottingham, University Park.
`Nottingham NO? 2RD. U.K.
`
`( 378-5173/K4/S03.00 C 1984 Elsevier Science Publishers S.V.
`
`Exhibit 1038
`ARGENTUM
`IPR2018-00080
`
`000001
`
`

`

`202
`
`MN • m-2. Tablets outside the weight range 290-310 mg were rejected. The dissolu-
`tion of the drug from the tablets was monitored using either a manual sampling or
`continuous flow •tec'que In the case of the manual method 1000 ml of 0.1 N
`hydrochloric acid was introduced into 6 vessels of an Erweka DT-D6 USP method 1
`dissolution apparatus with a rotation speed of 100 rpm. Samples were periodically
`withdrawn for spectrophotometric assay at 265 nm (Cecil Instruments, Model
`CF292) and then returned to the dissolution vessel. The continuous flow technique
`used the same dissolution apparatus but the dissolution medium was pumped
`through a spectrophotometer (Kontron, Model Uvikon 810) fitted with an automatic
`6 cell changer. A microprocessor (Commodore Business Machines, Model 8032)
`interfaced to the spectrophotometer gave digital absorbance values for each cell. The
`two sampling techniques have been shown to give equivalent results. The dissolution
`data were plotted as the percent remaining in the tablets against time.
`Viscosity determinations on 2% solutions of four HPMC grades were carried out
`at 37°C using a U-tube viscometer (Grade D) (British Pharmacopoeia 1980, method
`1).
`The dissolution profiles of chlorpheniratnine tablets made from the different
`viscosity grades of HPMC are shown in Fig. I. From the time for 50% release (Tso%)
`values shown in Table 1 it can be seen clearly that the drug dissolution from the
`tablets is significantly slower for the higher viscosity grade HPMCs. This fits with
`the findings of Huber and Christensen (1968) and Nakano et al. (1983) as described
`earlier.
`A substance that could affect the viscosity of an HPMC may be of use in
`changing the release of drug from tablets made from this material. It has been
`reported extensively in the literature (for example, Saito 1960) that the viscosity of
`
`% Drug remaining in tablet
`
`Fig. 1. The release of chlorphenirarnine from different viscosity grade HPMCs. Key: Methocel E5. a:
`Methocel (cid:9)
`Methocel E50, 0; Methocel E4M, ¤,
`
`Time (tiours1
`
`000002
`
`

`

`203
`
`non-ionic polymers can be increased by the addition of anionic surfactants. A
`similar type of effect has been reported more recently by Walker and Wells (1982)
`who found that a combination of the anionic sodium carboxymethyl-cellulose with
`cellulose produced a synergistic increase in viscosity. Thus the effect of the anionic
`surfactant sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS), on a modified HPMC (Synchron), used
`commercially to manufacture sustained release tablets, was studied to determine
`whether a more sustained action could be obtained through the incorporation of a
`surfactant.
`Firstly, the effect of SLS on the viscosity of a 2% Synchron solution at 37°C was
`studied. Table 1 shows that the viscosity is enhanced by the addition of SLS. Table 1
`also shows, for comparative purposes, the viscosity data obtained under the same
`conditions, for the four HPMCs used abs-we.
`To study the effect of SLS on the release of drug from HPMC tablets three
`different batches of Synchron were manufactured to contain 5, 10 and 15% surfac-
`tant. Fig. 2 shows that tablets containing 15% SLS give a zero-order in vitro release
`profile with a considerable retardation of release rate. From Fig. 2 it is evident that
`the retardation is dependent upon the amount of surfactant incorporated in the
`formulation.
`It is possible that this retardation is not due to the increased gel viscosity at the
`tablet periphery, but due to complex formation between the cationic ehlorphenira-
`mine and the anionic surfactant. However, this is unlikely to be the principal
`mechanism by which a more sustained action is achieved since similar release effects
`were obtained with anionic drugs. Changes in tablet porosity in the presence of
`
`TABLE 1
`
`A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE RELEASE OF CHLORPHENIRAMINE AND THE VISCOSITY
`GRADE
`
`HPMC
`
`Methocel E5 b
`Methocel EIS
`Methocel E50
`Methocel E4M
`Synchron'
`Synchron 2% + 0.25%
`sodium lauryl rilphate
`Synchron 2% + 0.5%
`sodium lauryl sulphate
`
`Viscosity'
`(centistokes)
`
`3.5
`9.9
`25.2
`2 662.0
`21.5
`
`45.7
`
`70.0
`
`Time for 50%
`release (T5o% )
`(h)
`
`1.1
`1.3
`1.7
`2.9
`1.7
`
`° Viscosity of a 2% solution (except where indicated) determined at 37°C.
`Methocel supplied by Colorcon Ltd., Kent.
`Synchron supplied by Pharmax Ltd., Kent.
`
`000003
`
`

`

`204
`
`100
`
`cn 60
`
`L.
`
`•_
`E
`La' 40
`cn
`L
`
`4'. 20
`
`A
`
`A
`
`•
`
`0
`
`a
`
`O
`
`0
`
`1 (cid:9)
`
`2 (cid:9)
`
`3 (cid:9)
`Time (hours)
`Fig. 2. The effect of sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) on the release of chlorpheniramine from Synchron.
`Key: no SLS, a; 5 SLS, 0; 10% SLS, •; 15% SLS. n.
`
`4 (cid:9)
`
`5 (cid:9)
`
`6
`
`surfactant are also unlikely to account for the change in release rates because
`compaction pressures in the range 50-200 MN • m-2 do not significantly alter the
`release rates from HPMC tablets (Daly, 1984). A series of non-ionic surfactants, Brij
`35, Myrj 59, Pluronic F88 and the cationic surfactant cetrimide, were also investi-
`gated. No change in the release rate of chlorpheniramine was noted, indicating thht
`the observed behaviour is restricted to anionic surfactants.
`It can be concluded that the anionic surfactant, SLS, is able to modify the release
`profiles of drugs from HPMC tablets giving an increased duration of release. It is
`considered that the mechanism involved is related to the ability of anionic surfac-
`tants to bind to non-ionic polymers acting to increase the viscosity.
`It is appreciated that SLS at high concentrations is not suitable for oral adminis-
`tration but mother anionic surfactant, dioctyl sodium sulphosuccinate, has been
`incorporated into HPMC tablets. The dissolution of this formulation has been
`assessed in human subjects using gamma scintigraphy. Again the surfactant gave a
`more sustained action, the results from this study have been reported elsewhere
`(Davis et al., 1983).
`
`Acknowledwments
`
`The authors would like to thank Kendal Pitt for technical assistance, Pharmax
`Ltd. for studentship to P.B.D. and Colorcon Ltd. for supplying the different grades
`of Methoc,,I.
`
`000004
`
`

`

`205
`
`References
`
`British Pharmacopoeia. Vol. IL Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1980, Appendix VH., p. A77.
`Bamba, M., Puisieux. F., Marty, J.P. and Carstensen, .I.T., Release mechanisms in gel forming sustained
`release preparations. Int. J. Pharts„ 2 (1979) 307-315.
`Davis, &&, Daly. P.B.. Kennerley, J.W. and Bradbury. D.M., The role of gamma scintigraphy to
`simultaneously monitor the in vivo dissolution of drug from two formulations. J. Pharm. Pharmacol.,
`(1983) in press.
`Daly, P.D.. Studies on the release of drugs from matrix tablets. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham,
`1984.
`Harwood. R.J. and Schwartz, J.B.. Drug release from compression molded films: preliminary studies with
`pilocarpine. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 8 (1982) 663-682.
`Huber, H.E. and Christensen, G.L., Utilisation of hydrophilic gums for the control of drug substance
`release from Tablet Formulations. II. Influence of tablet hardness and density on dissolution
`behaviour. J. Pharm. Sci., 57 (1968) 164-166.
`Higuchi, T.. Mechanism of sustained-action medication. Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid
`drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J. Pharm. Sci., 52 (1963) 1145-1149.
`Nakano. M., Ohmani. N., Ogata, A., Sugimato, K... Tabino, Y., lwaoku, R. and ICartilliko, J.. Sustained
`release of theophylline from hydroxypropyloellulaie tablets. J. Pharm. Sci., 72 (1983) 378-380.
`Saito, S., Binding of surfactants by polymers. J. Colloid Sci., 15 (1960) 283-286.
`United States Pharmacopoeia, Mack Publishing, Easton, Vol. XX, 1980, p. 959.
`Walker, C.V. and Wells, IL, Rheological synergism between ionic and non-ionic cellulose gums. Int. J.
`Pharm., 11 (1982) 309-322.
`
`000005
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket