throbber

`
`U vA
`
`SURGERY
`Gynecology
`er Obstetrics
`
`BIOMEDICAL LIBRARY
`
`JAN 1 4 1985
`
`LOS ANGELES
`
`Eeeigentum v Cosmo
`
`UNIVERSITY OF GALSFURNIA
`
`January 1985
`
`VOLUME 160 - NUMBER 1
`
`"ey
`
`Cosmo Ex. 2017-p.1 °° %&
`
`IPR2018-00080
`
`Cosmo Ex. 2017-p. 1
`Argentum v Cosmo
`IPR2018-00080
`
`

`

`DIFFERENCES IN PATHOGENESIS, INCIDENCE AND
`OUTCOME OF PERFORATION IN INFLAMMATORY
`
`BOWEL DISEASE
`
`A. J. Greenstein, M.D., F.R.C.S.(EDIN.)(ENG.), F.A.C.S., and
`A. H. Aufses, Jr., M.p., r.a.c.s., New York,
`New York
`
`PERFORATION is an uncommonbutlethal com-
`plication of inflammatory intestinal disease. It
`occurs more frequently in ulcerative colitis than
`in Crohn’s disease irrespective of whether the
`latter originates in the small or large intestine.
`Despite early reports to the contrary (1), perfor-
`ation in ulcerative colitis is usually preceeded by
`colonic dilation (2—6).
`In Crohn’s disease,
`perforation without dilation of the small or large
`intestine is more common (7), The incidence and
`outcome of perforation. with and without toxic
`megacolon in the two forms of inflammatory in-
`testinal disease are compared herein.
`MATERIAL AND METHODS
`
`The records of 1,623 patients with inflamma-
`tory intestinal disease admitted to The Mount
`Sinai Hospital between 1960 and 1980 were re-
`viewed retrospectively:
`there were 613 patients
`with ulcerative colitis
`(UC) and 1,010 with
`Crohn’s disease (CD). Of the patients with CD,
`457 had ileocolitis (IC), 166 had Crohn’s colitis
`(CC) and 387 regional enteritis (RE). Severity-
`five patients hadcolonic dilation, 61 with UC and
`14 with CD, and 29 patients with UC and20 pa-
`tients with CD hadeithera free or sealed off per-
`foration.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`The diagnosis of granulomatous disease was
`based upon criteria published previously (8-10).
`The clinicopathologic diagnosis of ulcerative co-
`litis was made on the basis of mucosal colitis ex-
`tending proximally from the rectum in the ab-
`sence of transmural disease, fissures, fistulas or
`skip areas. Free perforation was defined as spon-
`taneous rupture of the small or large intestine
`
`From the Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai School of
`Medicine of the City University of New York and The Mount Sinai
`Hospital, New York.
`Reprint requests: Dr. Adrian J. Greenstein, Mount Sinai Medi-
`ee One Gustave L, Levy Place, New York, New York
`29.
`
`with spillage of intestinal contents into the gene-
`ral peritoneal cavity and resulting peritonitis. A
`sealed perforation was occasionally recognized
`preoperatively as a tender palpable mass and es-
`tablished at laparotomy as an area of localized
`perforation sealed by adherent mass of omentum
`or peritoneum. Toxic dilation was based upon
`criteria similar to that described in one study (4)
`and included one or more of these findings: ab-
`dominaldistension, signs of peritonitis, tempera-
`ture of more than 101 degrees F., tachycardia of
`more than 120 per minute and a leukocyte count
`of more than 11,000 white blood cells per mil-
`limeter cubed. The diagnosis of colonic dilation
`wasaccepted if the colon measured 6.0 centime-
`ters or more in diameter on a roentgenogram or
`6.5 centimeters in diameter on barium enema.
`Mortality was defined as a death occurring dur-
`ing the same hospital admission. Analysis of the
`ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease data (Table
`I) was calculated using the programmed2 XK chi
`square contingency table of a 9815A Hewlett-
`Packard calculator.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Perforation in ulcerative colitis. Twenty-nine
`of 613 patients with ulcerative colitis (4.7 per
`cent) sustained a perforation (Fig. 1).'wenty-
`two of these occurred among 61 patients with
`toxic dilation (T'CD) (36 per cent). Seven occur-
`red among the remaining 552 patients without
`toxic dilation (1.3 per cent).
`Thirteen of 29 patients with UC died; nine of
`22 with TCD andfour of seven without TCD.
`Among the patients with TCD, 13 sustained a
`free perforation with five deaths and nine a sealed
`perforation with four deaths, Thus, the mortality
`was similar for patients with and without toxic
`colonic dilation and wasalso similarirrespective
`of whether the perforation was free or sealed at
`the time of operation. All patients with free per-
`foration except one were operated upon within
`
`63
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aeaae
`
`smo Ex. 2017-p. 2
`ntum v Cosmo
`
`IPR2018-00080
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cosmo Ex. 2017-p. 2
`Argentum v Cosmo
`IPR2018-00080
`
`

`

`rr
`387
`457
`Heocoliis
`ae
`Enteritis
`ia
`4
`
`Toxic Dilalation
`4
`
`Non TO
`609
`
`P.
`3
`
`Non P.
`"
`
`Deaihs Deaths
`2(67%)
`(0%)
`
`P
`wt
`
`Deaths
`0(0%)}
`
`re
`4(SB)
`
`Deaths
`0(0%)
`
`Morlabty 2°18 P (11%)+
`
`- January 1985 + Volume 160
`consistent with disseminated intravascular coag~-
`ulation (DIC). By contrast, DIC developed in
`only two of nine patients with a perforated UC
`and toxic colonic dilation who later died. Per-
`foration in patients with toxic megacolon was
`likely to be multiple and occured predominantly
`(52 per cent) in the transverse colon including the
`hepatic and splenic flexures; 20 per cent occurred
`in the sigmoidcolon.
`-erforation in Crohn’s disease. A free perfora-
`tion developed in twenty of 1,010 patients with
`Crohn’s disease (2 per cent) (‘Table I] and Fig. 1).
`Fourteen occurred among 623 patients with co-
`Jonic involvement (CDC), four developed in 387
`patients with regional enteritis (RE) and two pa-
`tients had perforations through areas of recurrent
`disease (one in the ileum proximal to an ileostomy
`andone in the sigmoid colon). Toxic dilation oc-
`curred in 14 of 623 patients with CDC and co-
`lonic involvement(2.24 per cent); five occurred in
`ileocolitis (1.1 per cent) and nine in granuloma-
`tous colitis (5.4 per cent). Perforation occurred in
`three of 14 patients with CDC and toxicdilation.
`One perforation was free and two were sealed.
`The two patients with sealed perforations and
`toxic colonic dilation died. ‘The one patient with
`the free perforation survived.
`Among the 609 patients with CDC, sponta-
`neous [ree perforation with peritonitis occurred
`in an additional 11 patients (nine in the colon
`alone, one in the ileum alone and one synchro-
`nously in the ileum and colon) without mortality.
`Seven were single perforations; one had foursi-
`multaneous synchronous perforations of ascen-
`
`
`
`64 Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics
`TOTAL NO. OF CASES
`1
`
`—SS}
`
`Crohn’s Disease*
`1080
`
`Ulcerative Colitis
`
`Ulcerative Collis
`613
`
`Toxic Dilatation
`
`Non-TD.
`582
`
`Perlorated
`22
`
`None.
`39
`
`Pp
`7
`
`Deaths
`9(41%)
`
`Deaths
`(2.6%)
`
`Deaths
`4(57%)
`
`Morlality 13/29 P (45%)?
`
`Fic. 1. Comparison of the incidences of perforation and
`mortality in 613 patients with ulcerative colitis and 1,010
`patients with Crohn's disease. *, Two additional deaths in
`perforation in recurrent disease in ileocolitis, one in the
`small intestine and onein the colon. f, ‘Ten colonic (one with
`two ileal perforations), one smal] intestine. $, In perforated
`instances (excluding recurrent disease *).
`
`one to nine hours of the presumed perforation,
`whereas the patients with a sealed perforation
`had severe symptomsfor an average of two days
`before operation.
`In UC without colonic dilation, massive bleed-
`ing developed in four patients with perforation
`who later died. Three had a decreased platelet
`count and increased partial thromboplastin time
`
`TABLE I—-A COMPARISON OF INCIDENCES OF TOXIC MEGACOLON, PERFORATION AND MORTALITY IN
`ULCERATIVE COLITIS AND CROHN’S DISEASE
`UC.
`
`C.D.
`
`Percent® C.D.C. Percentt
`
`X*
`
`~Pvalue
`
`Per cent
`
`mi
`
`| tt
`
`Toxic megacolon
`61/613
`WG worsus QD aie seen cag nce nese hese Rees
`UC versus CDC... ee eee eee 61/613
`UG Were GS wick tages sie METRO CISL Soe we
`61/613
`UG vergus 1G. cc epaccda ctanssectawersmesasaeee
`61/613
`Perforation
`rll POT ESET ETE TET ELCTIT TET TEE PITT rere
`Golo... asymysemes HSE eee ieee Ree TEE RES *.
`DTM nso serer xvii n sia HONG es mee
`0 as ow aie ew ge won ee see
`Tei PME sive secs ina en a6 2h O8e OE SER Ey ewe
`Mortality
`13/613
`Perforation of colon 2.0... 0.0. cece ee en eee
`4/7
`Free perforation, no TM «oie esc c ieee vee neces
`4/7
`Free pecloration§,; no TM. oi sx. sicvameswos mass
`9/22
`Perforation in TM .... 2.0.00. cee eee eee eee
`All primary perforation ...... 656.6200 see eee 13/29,
`All perforations. Se picis ce uel wielWiel's wow SAKw t
`¢ Wee
`13/29
`t
`UC, Ulcerative colitis, 613 patients.
`*CD, Crohn's disease, 1010
`patients.
`7oDe, Crohn's colitis (CC)and ileocolitis (IC), 623 patients.
`‘TM, Toxic megacolon, 75 patients—61 UC and 14 CDC.
`Free perforation without toxic megacolon in 20 patients.
`“Includes two mortalities in recurrent Crohn's disease.
`*Failed to reach statistical significance.
`
`29/613
`29/613
`22/613
`22/61
`
`10
`10
`10
`10
`
`4.7
`4.7
`3.6
`36
`
`2
`57
`Se
`41
`45
`45
`
`14/1010
`
`1.4
`
`20/4010
`
`2.0
`
`0/15
`
`2/18
`4/20
`
`0
`
`11
`20
`
`14/623
`9/166
`5/457
`
`13/623
`3/623
`3/14
`
`3/623
`0/10
`
`2/3
`
`nie
`5.4
`1.1
`
`pI
`0.5
`21
`
`0.5
`0
`
`67
`
`0.001
`63.49
`0.001
`30.1
`3.28 NSt
`35.49
`0.001
`
`9.9
`6.2
`14.4
`2.83
`
`6.3
`7.47
`10.47
`0.71
`5.81
`3.22
`
`0.005
`0.02
`0.005
`NS
`
`0.02
`0.01
`0.005
`NS
`0.02
`NS?
`
`Cosmo Ex. 2017-p. 3
`Argentum v Cosmo
`IPR2018-00080
`
`|
`
`—
`
`Cosmo Ex. 2017-p. 3
`Argentum v Cosmo
`IPR2018-00080
`
`

`

`
`
`PERCENTAGEINCIDENCE
`
`ULCERATIVE
`COLITIS
`
`CROHN'S
`(ILEO)COLITIS
`
`Oo O
`
`Toxic
`megacolon.
`Total cases
`
`61
`613
`(10 %)
`
`14
`623
`(2.2 %)
`
`Fic. 2. A significant greater incidence of toxic megacolon
`in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn’s disease involving the
`colon is shown (Crohn’s disease and ileocolitis).
`
`ding, transverse, descending and sigmoid colon,
`and one had metachronous perforations each in
`the descending colon.
`Four of 383 patients with regional enteritis
`(1.04 per cent) sustained a spontaneousfree per-
`foration, Two occurredin the jejunumin jejuno-
`ileitis and two in the ileumin regional ileitis. All
`four patients had evidence of dilation with stric-
`ture distal to the site of perforation. Three had a
`segmental small
`intestine or ileocolic resection
`and one resection with ileostomy and distal mu-
`cous fistula. The latter underwent subsequent
`successful reanastomosis. The four patients sur-
`vived, as did the patient with synchronousileal
`and colonic perforations. Thus, the 15 patients
`with spontaneous free perforation with perito-
`nitis without toxic colonic dilation in CD all sur-
`vived; this compares favorably with two deaths
`among three patients with toxic dilation in
`Crohn’s disease and nine deaths among 22 pa-
`tients with toxic colonic dilation in UC.
`Management ofpatients with perforation. Nine
`of 11 patients with colitis or ileocolitis in Crohn’s
`disease had resection with a proximal diverting
`ileostomy in eight and a colostomy in one. The
`
`TABLE I1—PERFORATION IN CROHN’S DISEASE ALL
`CROHN’S DISEASE 20 OF 1,010
`—COLITIS AND [ILEOCOLITIS—.
`——REGIONAL ENTERITIS_—
`N=16 of 623
`N=4of387
`
`Site
`Ileum
`Jejunum
`
`No.
`2
`2
`
`No.
`Site
`1
`Ileum
`10
`Colon*
`3
`Colon with TM (2+)
`2
`Recurrent disease (2})
`“Onc with two concomitantileal perforations.
`+Mortalities: 2 of three in toxic megacolon-sealed perforations.
`$Both with recurrent disease-free perforations (one ileum and one colon).
`TM, Toxic megacolon.
`
` IPR2018-00080
`
` WwW
`
`ULCERATIVE
`COLITIS
`
`CROHN'S
`COLITIS ;
`
`ILEO-
`COLITIS
`
`-
`4 10
`Oo
`= 8
`
`uw 6<i
`
`i7t
`
`da
`
`2
`
`P<0.00I |
`
`O .
`ieee SI
`
`Totalcases
`
`613
`
`2
`
`166
`
`5
`
`457
`
`(1.1%)
`
`(10%)
`
`(5.4%)
`
`Fic. 3. Toxic megacolonis significantly more commonin
`ulcerative colitis than in ilcocolitis and Crohn’s colitis than
`in ilcocolitis. Although the incidence is approximately twice
`as high in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn’s colitis, a sig-
`nificant difference could not be demonstrated.
`
`other two hadsuture and proximal colectomy and
`exteriorization with proximal colostomy, respec-
`tively.
`A comparison of the incidence of toxic megaco-
`lon in UC and CD.In this series, the incidence of
`toxic megacolon wassignificantly greater in UC
`than in CD (Fig. 2), GDC or IC (Fig. 3). In ad-
`dition,
`the incidence of
`toxic megacolon was
`significantly greater for Crohn’s colitis when
`compared with patients with ileocolitis (nine of
`166 versus five of 457, DF=1; X?=10.38; p<
`0.001)
`(Fig. 3). However, when patients with
`disease confined to the colon were compared, al-
`thoughcolonic dilation in UC was almost twice as
`common as in CC (UC 10 versus CC 5.4 per
`cent) a significant difference in 1'CD could not be
`demonstrated (Fig. 3) (Table I).
`A comparison of perforations of large or small
`intestine. In UC, the incidence of perforation was
`
`Greenstein and Aufses: PATHOGENESIS, INCIDENCE AND OUTCOME OF PERFORATION
`
`65
`
`Cosmo Ex. 2017-p. 4
`Argentum v Cosmo
`IPR2018-00080
`
`

`

`
`
`66 Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics « January 1985 - Volume 160
`
`WITH
`TOXIC MEGACOLON
`Ulcerative colitis
`‘
`S
`:
`
`7
`bas
`Crohns (ileo)colitis
`
`oO
`
`TOTAL
`
`COLON
`PERFORATIONS
`
`a4
`
`w 5
`oO
`ia
`S
`="
`E
`i 2
`cr
`a |
`
`O.
`OSiee5teens
`
`Fic. 4. A signficantly greater incidenceof total colonic perforation and perforation with toxic
`megacolon in ulcerative colitis compared with Crohn’s disease involving the colon is shown (colitis
`and ileocolitis) when considered as a proportion of thetotal series.
`in ulcerative colitis and
`Fic. 5, Perforation in toxic megacolon is not significantly different
`Crohn’s colitis involving the colon when it
`is considered as a proportion ofall patients with
`megacolon.
`28 times as frequent in patients with TCD than
`in those without; compared with ten times the
`frequencyin patients with CD and TCD (Table
`1). Within the context of the total series, colonic
`perforation in patients with disease confined to
`the colon and patients with perforation in toxic
`megacolon were bothsignificantly greater in pa-
`tients with UG (Fig. 4). The increase in perfora-
`tion in UG was dueto the higher incidence and
`proportion of toxic megacolon in UC and prob-
`ably also to the higher proportion of perforation
`in patients with UC and TCD(36 versus 21 per
`cent) (Fig. 5). However,if one examines only the
`75 patients with toxic megacolon with UC and
`CD,although the proportion of patients who had
`perforations was almost
`twice as great
`in the
`former, the difference wasnotstatistically signif-
`icant in this series (Fig. 5). The incidence of co-
`lonic perforation in the absenceof toxic megaco-,
`lon wassimilar in the twoseries (seven of 552 for
`UG, 1.2 per cent versus 11 of 607 with, DG,1.8
`per cent).
`Comparison of mortality. The over-all mor-
`tality for perforationsof the colonas a proportion
`of the total series was four times greater in UC
`
`PERFORATIONS
`
`ULCERATIVE
`0
`
`COLITIS
`
`(
`
`CROHN'S
`)C.
`
`ILEO)COLITIS
`
`=
`
`i
`Gj
`5
`es
`=
`.
`=
`‘
`O
`acLu
`
`(5
`
`0
`Perforations
`Total cases
`
`13
`29
`613 623
`(4.7 %) (2.1%)
`Fic. 4
`
`3
`22
`Perforations
`3 i aes
`22
`Toxicmegacolon
`61
`14
`S13. 623
`(3.6%) (0.5%)
`(36%)
`(21%)
`Fic. 5
`
`than in CDC (2 versus 0.5 per cent) andthe dif-
`ference wasstatistically significant (Table I). If
`one examines all 47 primary spontaneous per-
`forations, omitting the two deaths which occurred
`with recurrent disease, there is a significant dif-
`ference in mortality between UC and CD (Fig.
`6). With the addition of the two perforations in
`recurrent Crohn’s disease, the results of the chi
`squaretest fail to reach statistical significance.
`Mortality was significantly greater in patients
`with perforation in UC than in those with
`Crohn’s disease in both the over-all series and in
`the absence of toxic megacolon, but not in toxic
`megacolon if examined separately. A comparison
`of free perforation in the absenceof toxic dilation
`revealed a highly significant difference between
`the two groups (Fig. 7). More than one-half of
`the patients with UC died—four of seven pa-
`tients, 57 per cent. This incidence is comparable
`with the 41 per cent mortality for perforation in
`UC with toxic megacolon. All 15 patients with
`Crohn’s disease (includingall ten patients with
`free colonic perforation andfive with free small
`intestinal perforation) (Table IJ) survived (Fig.
`7.) Mortality was no different in toxic megacolon
`
`Cosmo Ex. 2017-p. 5
`Argentum v Cosmo
`IPR2018-00080
`
`Cosmo Ex. 2017-p. 5
`Argentum v Cosmo
`IPR2018-00080
`
`

`

`
`
`ULCERATIVE
`COLITIS
`
`t
`
`CROHNS
`DISEASE
`
`WW 5 O
`O
`=
`O40
`O
`=
`= ou
`Oo
`
`-
`SS 20
`
`ac
`Lu
`a |O
`
`O
`Deaths
`.
`Perforations
`
`.
`
`2
`13
`18
`29
`(11%)
`(45%)
`Tic. 6. Mortality was significantly greater in primary per-
`forations ofthe intestine in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn’s
`disease when29 patients with ulcerative colitis are compared
`with 18 patients with Crohn’s disease.
`
`in the patients with UC compared with those
`with Crohn’s disease or in patients with UC with
`free perforation compared with those with sealed
`perforations. We have no explanation for
`the
`remarkable clifference in survival in free perfora-
`tion in the absence of toxic megacolon in UC and
`CD, but it may be due to differing immunologic
`states or pathogenetic mechanisms.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Perforation of the colon in UC wasrecognized
`in 1875 (11). The association of perforation with
`toxic megacolon was notedin 1955 (12) and since
`that time there have been many reports of this
`association.
`Althoughit has been suggested that Morgagni,
`in 1769, gave us the first description of Crohn’s
`disease with free perforation (13), others are
`skeptical of the actual nature of the original in-
`stance which Morgagni described. Janowitz be-
`lieves Crohn’s disease to be a disease of recent
`onset
`(14). The first perforated abscess
`in
`Crohn’s disease was described from this institu-
`tion in 1935 (15). Free perforation of the colonin
`
`Greenstein and Aufses: PATHOGENESIS, INCIDENCE AND OUTCOME OF PERFORATION
`
`67
`
`WITH
`WITHOUT
`lOO TOXIC MEGACOLON TOXIC MEGACOLON
`YY Ulcerative colitis
`Crohn's (ileo)colitis
`
`3
`
`
`
`wl
`oO
`ai 80
`QO
`3
`= 60
`Ww
`= 40
`
`zé
`
`a 20
`a
`
`O
`
`Deaths 92 4 0
`Noof perforations
`22.
`3
`7
`10
`(41%) (67%)
`(57%) (0%)
`Fic. 7. The mortality of 42 patients with colonic perfora-
`tionsis significantly greater in primary perforation of the in-
`testine without toxic megacolon in ulcerative colitis than in
`Crohn's disease involving the colon. In toxic megacolon, the
`mortality was equally high, although there were only three
`such patients in the group of patients with Crohn’s
`disease.
`
`
`
`iii
`
`i
`
`{
`|
`f
`i}
`
`fl
`
`|
`
`Ht
`AM}
`|
`
`
`
`|
`|
`te
`3 He
`ss
`Ss
`ie
`
`|
`
`
` ISOANGELES
`
`Crohn’s disease was described in 1965 (16). Since
`then an additional 15 instances have been repor-
`ted (17).
`In one study, 32 publications which reported
`upon 604 patients with toxic colonic dilation in
`UC were reviewed (18). One hundred and four-
`teen patients or 19 per cent had perforations with
`a mortality in surgically treated patients of 41.2
`per cent compared with 8.8 per cent associated
`with patients without perforations (18).
`In 1960, 16 instances of colonic dilation in UC
`were reported; in retrospect, two patients clearly
`had Crohn’s disease (19). ‘There have since been
`reports of toxic megacolon in Crohn’s disease
`(20-22), with an incidence of ‘TM as high as 20
`per cent (23). Colonic perforation in UC in the
`absence of toxic dilation is relatively rare (2-6).
`Perforation without dilation of the large or small
`intestine is more frequent in Crohn’s disease and
`TABLE IIL—PERFORATION WITH AND WITHOUT
`TOXIC MEGACOLON IN ULCERATINE COLITIS
`
`Authors
`Lumb and co-workers (12), 1955......
`Edwards and Truelove (1), 1964 ......
`Goligher and co-workers (27), 1970..,.
`Block andassociates (6), 1977.........
`Albrechtson and co-workers (5), 1981 ..
`Presént.séries; 1983 ac. tise: s suis om ayers
`
`—~Toxte megacolon_—
`Yes
`No
`Total
`
`1
`2
`38
`4
`61
`
`19
`6
`1
`0
`7
`
`20
`8
`39
`4
`68
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`osmo Ex. 2017-p. 6
`ntum v Cosmo
`
`IPR2018-00080
`
`Cosmo Ex. 2017-p. 6
`Argentum v Cosmo
`IPR2018-00080
`
`

`

` 68 Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics -
`
`
`January 1985 - Volume 160
`may occur in both the large and small intestines
`48 hours after admission to the hospital. Al-
`(7, 17, 24, 25).
`though nonoperative management remains the
`The relationship of perforation to TCD is ex-
`first therapeutic modality for toxic colonic dila-
`amined in Table III. In 1964 (1), 624 patients
`tion, the patient must be carefully monitored by
`with UC were reported upon. The incidence of
`both the gastroenterologist and surgedn. If mor-
`free perforation was 3.2 per cent and the inci-
`tality is to be avoided, then surgical treatment
`dence of toxic megacolon was 1.6 per cent. Nine-
`must be carried out early if there is no immediate
`teen of 20 patients had perforation develop with-
`response to primary therapy.
`out evidenceof colonic dilation and 75 per cent of
`Colonic perforation remains a highly lethal
`these patients died (Table II). ‘Ten were diag-
`complication of inflammatory intestinal disease,
`particularly in the presence of toxic colonic dila-
`nosed at autopsy. ‘Thus,
`it
`is possible that these
`tion. Excellent survival is possible in Crohn’s dis-
`patients may well have had colonic dilation and
`perforation of a dilated intestine prior to their
`ease without TCD. The remarkable difference in
`death. However, three of nine patients with toxic
`survival in patients with free perforation and per-
`megacolon died. An autopsy was performed upon
`itonitis in CD compared with UC is difficult to
`two, and there was no evidence of perforation in
`understand. It may reflect differing immunologic
`any of the patients. In 1965, 465 patients with
`states. It may also indicate differing pathogenetic
`UC were studied (26) andassociated toxic dila-
`mechanisms. Perforation in CD is the endresult
`tion in five of 13 patients who had 20 separate
`of slowly progressive fissure formation culminat-
`perforations was found (26). However, it is be-
`ing in rupture, whereas in UC deep ulceration
`lieved that perforations without toxic dilation are
`and extensive tissue necrosis may occur rapidly
`uncommon (4) and the results of recent studies
`prior to rupture and result in systemic liberation
`support this impression (5, 6). In one study (6),
`of toxic tissue substances.
`only one instance of perforation withouttoxic di-
`lation (TCD) was found among 39 patients with
`UC who underwent emergency surgical
`treat-
`ment (Table II). In another study, no instances
`of perforation among 87 patients with UC and
`without TCD who were operated upon were
`found, andonly four of 45 instances of TCD were
`found, which wasattributed to a policy of early
`colectomy. We have similarly found that perfor-
`ation in UCis usually associated with TCD. In
`our series, TCD developed in 61 of 613 patients
`with UC, 10.0 per cent, but in only 14 of 623 pa-
`tients with CDC, 2.24 per cent (2). The correla-
`tion of perforation with ‘TCD in UC (2) is due
`mainly to the high incidence of toxic megacolon
`(10 per cent) in UC. In Crohn’s disease, 20 of
`1,010 patients had perforations, but only three
`occurred among 14 patients with TCD compared
`with 22 among 61 with toxic megacolon in UC.
`In inflammatoryintestinal disease, perforation
`may be difficult to recognize clinically (1), par-
`ticularly in patients taking high dosage steroids.
`‘Therefore, it has been suggested that early surgi-
`cal treatment should be carried out upon patients
`with a suspected perforation, signs of peritonitis
`or recognized toxic megacolon. In one study, a
`reduction in perforatien rates was found in UC
`treated by early operation—32.5 to 11.1 per cent
`(27). A perforation rate of only 3.0 per cent and
`mortality of 5.3 per cent was found (5) when
`surgical treatment was carried out within 24 to 48
`hoursof the onset of indications for operation and
`
`Wehave studied the patient records of 49 or
`1,623 patients in whom perforation occurred
`during the course of
`inflammatory intestinal
`disease. Perforation occurred most commonly
`with toxic megacolon in UC, but without toxic
`megacolon in Crohn’s disease of the colon.
`The incidence of perforation was significantly
`greater in UC than in Crohn’s disease involving
`the colon. ‘This was due primarily to the higher
`incidence of perforations with toxic megacolonin
`the former. Theincidence of toxic megacolon was
`significantly greater in ulcerative colitis than in
`Crohn’s disease involving the colon (CC and IC)
`and in UCthaninileocolitis. Although almost
`twice as frequent in UC than in Crohn’s colitis
`alone, a significant difference could not be dem-
`onstrated in this series for patients with UC
`compared with CC. In UG, the incidence of per-
`foration was 28 times as frequentif toxic colonic
`dilation occurred, compared with ten times the
`frequency of TCD in Crohn’s disease involving
`the colon. There wasa significantly higher inci-
`dence of perforation in patients with UC with
`toxic megacolon. The incidence of colonic per-
`foration in the absence of toxic megacolon was
`similar in the twoseries (7 of 552 for UC, 1.2 per
`cent, versus 11 of 607 for CDG, 1.8 per cent).
`Mortality was no different in toxic megacolon
`in patients with UC compared with those with
`Crohn’s disease or in patients with UC withfree
`
`SUMMARY
`
`ye
`
`Cosmo Ex. 2017-p. 7
`Argentum v Cosmo
`IPR2018-00080
`
`Cosmo Ex. 2017-p. 7
`Argentum v Cosmo
`IPR2018-00080
`
`

`

`Greenstein and Aufses: PATHOGENESIS, INCIDENCE AND OUTCOME OF PERFORATION
`
`69
`
`IPR2018-00080
`
`REFERENCES
`
`perforation compared with those with sealed
`12. Lump, G., Protineror, R. H. B., and Ramsay, G. S.
`Ulcerative colitis with toxic dilatation of the colon. Br. >
`perforation. Mortality was significantly greater
`J. Surg., 1955, 43: 182-188.
`in patients with perforation in UC thanin those
`13. Morcacni, J. B. De sedibus et causis morbarum. The
`with Grohn’s disease in: the absence of
`toxic
`seats and causes of diseases investigatedbyanatomy, in
`§ books, containin
`reat varicty of dissection and
`remarks, Tanslated by Boniaenin Alexander. Edited by
`megacolon. All 15 patients with spontaneousfree
`A. Miller and T. Cadell, Pp. 64; 1,769. New York:
`perforation in Crohn’s disease treated by resec-
`tion or exteriorization with diversion survived
`Hafner Publishing Co., Inc., 1960.
`14, Janowrrz, H. D. Crohn’s disease; 50 years later
`compared with four of seven deaths of free per-
`(Editorial), N. Engl. J. Med., 1981, 304: 1600-1602.
`foration in UC. Wehave no explanation for the
`15. Arnuem, E. E. Regional ileitis with perforation, ab-
`remarkable difference in survival of free perfora-
`scess and peritonitis. J. Mt. Sinai Hosp., 1935, 2: 61-63.
`16. Riscuman, D. M., and Gruzowoy, 7}. Ileocolitis de
`tion in the absence of toxic megacolon in UC and
`Crohn con perforacion libre. Prensa Med. Argent.,
`CD, but it may be dueto differing immunologic
`1965, 52: 2116-2119.
`17. Orpa, R., Gotpwaser, B., and Wiznirzer, T. Free
`~
`states or pathogenetic mechanisms.
`perforation of the colon in Grohn’s disease. Report ofa
`case and review ofthe literature. Dis. Colon Rectum,
`1982, 25: 145-147.
`18. Srrauss, R. J., Frnt, G. W., PLarT, N., and others.
`The surgical management of toxic dilatation of the co-
`lon; a report of 281 cases and a review of the literature.
`Ann. Surg., 1976, 184: 682-688.
`19, Marsuak, R. H., Korewuirz, B. L, Kiem, S. H., and
`others. Toxic dilatation of the colon in the course of ul-
`cerative colitis. Gastroenterology, 1960, 48; 165-180.
`20. Buzzarp, A. J., Baker, W. N. W., Neepiam, P. R. G.,
`and Warren, R. E. Acute toxic dilatation of the colon
`in Crohn’s colitis. Gut, 1974, 15: 416-419,
`21. Javeryr, S. L., and Brooke, B. N. Acute dilatation of
`the colon in Crolin’s disease. Lancet, 1970, 2: 126-128.
`22. Greenstein, A. J., Karn, A. E., and Drettane, D. A.
`Crohn'sdisease of the colon—III, toxic dilatation of the
`colon in Crohn’s disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1975,
`63: 117-128.
`23. Haws, W.A., and Turnsutt, R. B. Primary ulcerative
`disease of the colon, Gastroenterology, 1966, 51: 802-
`805.
`24. Nasr, K., Morowirz, D, A., ANDERSON, J. G., and
`Kirsnrr, J. B. Free perforation in regional enteritis.
`Gut, 1969, 10; 206-208.
`25. Srrinpera, D. M., Cooxr, W. T., and ALEXANDER-
`Wituiams, J. Free perforation in Crohn’s disease. Gut,
`1973, 14: 187-190.
`26. DeDompat,F. '‘T., Warts, J. M., Warinson, G., and
`Goricuer, J. C. Intraperitoneal perforation of the co-
`lon in ulcerative colitis. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1965, 58:
`713-715.
`27. Goutaner, J. C., Horrman, D. C., and DeDomaat,
`F. T. Surgical treatment of severe attacks of ulcerative
`colitis, with special reference to the advantages of carly
`operations. Br. Med. J., 1970, 4: 703-706.
`
`1. Epwarps, F. C., and Trurtove, S. C. The course and
`prognosis of ulcerative colitis—III, complications. Gut,
`1964, 5: 1-22.
`2. Greensrrin, A. J., Sacuar, D. B., Grsas, A., and
`others. Outcome of toxic dilation in ulcerative and
`Crohn’s colitis, Unpublished data.
`3. Greensrein, A. J., Barri, J. A., and Aursks, As Ts
`Jr. Free colonic perforation withoutdilation in ulcera-
`tive colitis. In press,
`4. JAtan, K. N., Sircus, W., Carp, W. I. and others. An
`expericnce ofulcerative colitis—I, toxic dilation in 55
`cases, Gastroenterology, 1969, 57: 69-82.
`5. Ausrecirrson, D., Bercen, A., Nycaarp, K., and
`others. Urgent surgery for ulcerative colitis; carly colec-
`tomy in 132 patients. World J. Surg., 1981, 5: 607-615.
`6. Brock, G. E., Moossa, A. R., SIMONOW!tz, D., and
`HASSAN, S. Z. Emergency colectomy for inflammatory
`bowel disease. Surgery, 1977, 82: 531-536.
`7. Greunsrem, A. J.. Mann, D., and Aurses, A. HL, Jr
`Free perforation of the small and large bowel in Crohn's
`disease. In preparation,
`8. LockuartT-Mummery, H. E., and Morson, B. C.
`Crohn’s disease of the large intestine. Gut, 1964, 5: 493-
`509.
`9. Cook, M.D., and Dixon, M. F. Ananalysis of the re-
`liability of detection and diagnostic value of various
`pathological features in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative
`colitis. Gut, 1973, 14; 155-262.
`10. Greunsremn, A. J., Geccer, S. A., Dremine, D. A., and
`Aursts, A. H., Jr. Crohn’s disease of the colon—IV.
`_ Am. J. Gastroenterol., 1975, 64: 191-199.
`!1. Wirxs, S., and Moxon, W. Lectures on pathological
`*
`anatomy. London: Churchill Livingstone Ltd., 1875.
`
`osmo Ex. 2017-p. 8
`ntum v Cosmo
`
`Cosmo Ex. 2017-p. 8
`Argentum v Cosmo
`IPR2018-00080
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket