throbber
Drugs of the Future 1993, 18(6): 529-549
`Copyright PROUS SCIENCE
`
`13 3 - A d renergic agonists
`
`Review Article
`
`Ralph Howe
`Research Department, ZENECA Pharmaceuticals, Alderfey
`Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 4TG, United Kingdom
`
`CONTENTS
`Introduction (cid:9)
`The adipocyte atypical beta-adrenoceptor (cid:9)
`Distribution of atypical beta-adrenoceptors (cid:9)
`beta3-Adrenoceptor agonists as potential drugs (cid:9)
`Thermogenic drugs for the treatment of obesity
`and diabetes (cid:9)
` 533
`Drugs for the treatment of intestinal hypermotility disorders 542
`Conclusions (cid:9)
` 544
`Acknowledgements (cid:9)
` 544
`References (cid:9)
` 544
`
` 529
` 530
` 531
` 533
`
`Introduction
`Classification of receptor systems which are activated by
`sympathomimetic amines has engaged the attention of
`many investigators.for many years, and continues to do so.
`In 1948, Ahlquist suggested the convenient designations al-
`pha (a) and beta (13) to distinguish major differences in the
`responses elicited in various organ systems by adrenergic
`agents (1). The concept of two kinds of adrenoceptor was
`based on the relative potencies of six sympathomimetic
`'amines to relax the ureters and uterus, contract the nictitat-
`ing membrane, inhibit the gut and stimulate the myocar-
`dium. Thirty years later Ahlquist looked back at adrenocep-
`tors (2) and in 1984 Carrier and Shlafer looked back at the
`man and his work (3).
`"a-Adrenoceptors were generally associated with con-
`traction of smooth muscle. Some blood vessels are con-
`stricted, the radial muscle of iris contracts to produce my-
`driasis and the ureters and splenic capsule are contracted.
`The only organ system that did not fit the scheme that 'all al-
`pha-mediated responses are excitatory' was the gut, which
`was relaxed by what we now call a-agonists.
`The j3-adrenoceptor was generally associated with inhibi-
`tory responses: blood vessels are dilated, bronchial smooth
`muscle is relaxed, and, as was the case with a-agonists, In-
`testinal activity is inhibited. Just as the gut served to demon-
`strate that all a-mediated responses are not excitatory, the
`heart served to demonstrate that not all responses that are
`classified as '13' were of an inhibitory nature" (3).
`In 1967,*Lands et al. obtained results which could not be
`explained easily on the assumption that the 13 type desig-
`nates a single receptor population (4). Their studies showed
`that two distinct receptor subtypes could at that time be in-
`
`eluded within the 13 type, They found a marked similarity be-
`tween the rank order of potencies of fifteen catecholamine
`sympathomimetic amines for lipolysis in white adipose tis-
`sue and cardiac stimulation and also a similarity for bron-
`chodilator and vasodepressor activity. There was a lack of
`correlation for other combinations of the four effects. The re-
`ceptor mediating responses in the heart and lipolysis was
`deeignated 131 and that mediating vasodepressor activity
`and bronchodilation was labelled 132. Further studies based
`on the potencies of sympathomimetic amines classified the
`receptor responsible for inhibition in the rabbit small intes-
`tine as Pi and that In the rat uterus and diaphragm muscle
`as 132 (5).
`*While pharmacologists were engaged in the classification
`of adrenoceptors, medicinal chemists had been producing
`compounds which would act as agonists or antagonists of
`the various adrenoceptor types. Some of these agents were
`non-selective for the adrenoceptor subtypes but others had
`varying degrees of selectivity fora particular subtype. Ex-
`amples are isoprenaline, a selective agonist for 13-adreno-
`ceptors rather than a-adrenoceptors but non-selective for
`either Pr or132- adrenoceptors (6), and propranolol, a selec-
`tive antagonist for 13- rather than a-adrenoceptors but
`non-selective for either Pr or 132-adrenoceptors (7). Exam-
`ples of agents with selectivity for 131- rather than 132-adreno-
`ceptors are the agonist prenalterol (8, 9) and the antagonist
`atenolol (10); agents with selectivity for 132: rather than
`131-adrenoceptors are the agonist salbutamol (11) and the
`'antagonist ICI 118551 (12, 13). Such agents were key to
`confirming or questioning the classification and to extending
`it. In particular, the classification of the white adipose tissue
`13-adrenoceptor as the 131 subtype has been questioned by
`many groups and this is discussed in the next section.
`Arch has stressed the serious limitations of classifying re-
`ceptors solely on the basis of rank order of potencies of ago-
`nists (14). The approach can be criticized if only a limited
`range of agonists is used and it can be misleading if some
`of the agonists have a lower efficacy than others and abso-
`lute responses are compared. Rather than use agonists,
`whose efficacies may differ, pharmacologists now prefer to
`classify receptors using antagonists, which have zero effica-
`cy. It Is necessary to use agonists selective for each receptor
`
`Sawai Ex. 1004
`Page 1 of 21
`
`

`

`530 (cid:9)
`
`P-Adrenergic agonists
`
`subtype in combination with antagonists of various selectivi-
`ties. A novel receptor type can onfy be detected using both
`an agonist that acts, at legst in part, via this receptor and an
`antagonist that has a different affinity for the novel receptor
`compared with known receptors. He pointed out that most
`studies fall far short of these stringent criteria.
`
`. The adipocyte atypical 13-adrenocepter
`
`The classification of the lipolytic 13-adrenoceptor as a
`subtype was questioned by Harms et al. in 1974 (15, 16),
`who showed that antagonism of lipolysis could correlate
`with either fl radrenoceptor antagonism or132-adrenoceptor
`antagonism depending upon the structural type of the an-
`tagonist used. They proposed a hybrid receptor having
`characteristics of both the 131- and 132-adrenoceptor sub-
`types. Later studies In Which isoprenaline was used as the
`13-adrenoceptor agonist and two series of analogs,of tole-
`molol as antagonists supported the idea of a dualistic 13 and
`- 132 Character of the rat adipocyte fl-adrenoceptor which
`)could not be explained by the presence of two different pop-
`- .ulations of pi- ahdl3i-adrenoceptors. Further, the rat 'adipo-
`cyte13-adrenoceptor population was shown to be homoge-
`neous (17). These views on the hybrid nature of the
`13-adrenoceptor of the white adipose cell•of the rat were sup-
`ported by Tan and Curtis-Prior who, in 1983, proposed that
`It be termed a 'beta-hybrid' or '133' adrenoceptor (18).
`The hypothesis of a new- and discrete P-adrenoceptor
`subtype (133) remained tenuous in the-absence of agonists
`or antagonists selective for it. In 1984, however, Wilson et
`al. of Beecham Pharmaceuticals reported on the activities
`of three novel arylethanolamine 13-adrenoceptor agonists,
`BRL 28410, BRL 35113 and BRL 35135*, which showed se-
`lectivity for rat white adipose tissue lipolysis, supporting the
`view that the rat lipolytic 13-adrenoceptor is atypical, that is,
`it is distinct from either the 131- or 132-adrenoceptor subtype
`(19). Appropriate studies were carried out using available
`13-adrenoceptor antagonists; there was no antagonist with
`selectivity for the atypical 13-adrenoceptor. Wilson et al.
`•oointed out that the hybrid 111/132 receptor proposed by
`.harms eta!, and De Vente et al. adequately explained the
`results obtained by those authors but that the model did not
`readily explain their own result's. It is difficult to envisage a
`lipolytic receptor with 13i- and, 132-adrenoceptor characteris-
`tics when, for example, BRL 35113 is a poor agonist at both
`pi- and132-adrenoceptors yet is a potent agonist at the lipo-
`lytic 13-adrenoceptor.
`Concurrent studies by Arch et al. of the Beecham Group
`(20), who used BRL 28410, BRL 35113 and BRL 37344 (the
`carboxylic acid related to the methyl ester BRL 35135) in a
`
`• BRL compounds, including BRL 35135, occasionally have the
`suffix 'A' after the number. It is understood that this simply indi-
`cates that the substance is a salt and so the 'A' is omitted in this
`review. The pharmacological properties of these compounds and
`the clinical results on two of them are considered in a later section.
`Chemical structures are also shown in a later section.
`
`study of lipolysis in rat interscapular brown adipocytes,
`showed that in the rat the brown adipocyte receptor is nei-
`ther ,a or nor a 132-adrenoceptor and that brown and white
`adipocytes "have similar, though not necessarily identical,"
`13-adrenoceptors. The most potent compound, BRL 37344,
`stimulated lipolysis with 400- and 20-fold selectivity com-
`pared with atria1131 ancitrachea1132 responses; respectively.
`Stock and Sudera studied rat brown adipocyte respiration,
`rather than lipolysia, using isoprenalina, BRL 37344 and ICI
`201651 as agonists • and p'ropranolol, atenolol and ICI
`118551 as antagonists, and concluded that the interaction
`of the novel agonists with brown adipocyte13-adrenoceptors
`differed from that of isoprenaline, giving support to the work
`.
`of the Beecham group (21). (cid:9)
`Receptor binding studies using conventional13-adrenerg-
`ic agents had failécl to reveal the atypical13-adrenoceptor in
`brown adipocytes. Most studies suggested that the brown
`adipocyte receptor is of the 131-subtyPei but two groirps had
`reported13,-: 132-adrenoceptór populations of 59:41 (22) and
`80:20 (23) for rat brown adipose tissue. Arch (14) haS re-
`viewed the binding studies and has pointed to the problems
`that affect them; First, the receptors stridied by binding
`methods may not be the ones that mediate the functional re-
`sponse. Second, just as functional studies using antago-
`nists can only detect receptors through which the ligand.
`acts, binding studies cannot detect receptors that do not
`bind the labelled ligand. Detection of the atypical receptor by
`binding studies requires the use of a labelled ligand that
`binds selectively to the atypical receptor. Recently, Hollenga
`and Zaagsma have investigated the effects of the selective
`antagonists CGP 20712A (131) and ICI 118551 (32) on BRL
`37344- and isoprenaline-induced lipolysis in rat white adipo-
`cytes (24). Their results show that the selective 133-agonist
`BRL 37344 acts solely through atypical 13-adrenoceptors,
`whereas isoprenaline, a non-selective 13-agonist, acts pre-
`dominantly through atypical 13-adrenoceptors; Pradreno-
`ceptors, detected in binding studies, play at most a small
`and subordinate functional role in isoprenaline-induced li-
`polysis. Similarly, adenyl cyClase activation in rat adipocytes
`•by BRL 37344 is solely mediated by atypical (133 subtype) re-
`ceptors and isoprenaline is predominantly mediated by
`atypical (33 subtype) receptors (25).
`An important contribution was made by Emorine et al. in
`1989 when they reported the isolation of a gene which coded
`for the human 133-adrenoceptor (26). A human genomic
`DNA library was screened with the entire coding regions of
`the genes for the turkey 131- and the human 132-adrenocep-
`tors. Sequences complementary to both receptor probes
`were found in fragments from 14 clones, one of which was
`entirely sequenced and shown to contain a gene coding for
`a polypeptide with an amino acid sequence 51% and 46%
`identical to those of 131- and 132-adrenoceptors, respectively.
`The receptor protein, which the authors called '133-adreno-
`ceptor', had clear atypical 13-adrenoceptor properties when
`expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO), which
`normally contain no 13-adrenoceptor activity (26, 27). The
`CHO-133 cells were analyzed for ligand binding and cAMP
`production and compared with the • similarly prepared
`
`Dn.
`
`Cl-
`gai
`rec
`wh
`cal
`Thi
`nor
`cej
`llp
`cla
`R3-
`eni
`del
`qui
`
`(3C
`tua
`brc
`for
`
`ma
`phi
`chc
`for
`cat
`or
`aty
`full
`the
`0.6
`tim
`cei
`cal
`cie
`133'
`ten
`
`the
`sur
`13,-
`36)
`131-
`del
`oni
`tYP
`prc
`in r
`on
`erg
`Zul
`
`133"
`OVE
`do‘
`
`'It
`37
`
`Sawai Ex. 1004
`Page 2 of 21
`
`

`

`3.
`
`:e
`
`4,
`1- .
`y.
`1,
`;I
`
`'s
`
`Drugs Fut 1993, 18(6)
`
`531
`
`CH0-131 and CHID-132 cells (28). They used P-adrenergic li-
`gands known to interact selectively with p,, 132 or atypical
`receptors and confirmed 'that the human 133-adrenoceptor,
`when expressed in CHO cells, is indeed related to the atypi-
`cal P-adrenoceptors Charebterized in rodent'adipoie tissue.
`The potency orderof 13-adrenergic agonists for the 03-adre-
`noceptor was clearly different from that for the Pradreno-
`ceptor and for the 112-edrenoberitói and reseMbled that for
`lipolysis stimulation in rodent brown adipose tissue. Also,
`classical 13-antagonists displayed very low affinity for the
`N-adrenoceptor expressed in CHO cells. However, differ-
`ences between the cloned human P3-adrenoceptor and ro-
`dent atypical adrenoceptors led Zaagsma and Nahorski to
`question whether they.were, in fact; homologous proteins
`(29). Also, experiments with the cloned yet N-adrenoceptor
`(30, 31) indicate that its pharmacological properties are vir-
`tually identical to those of the atypical adrenoceptor in rat
`brown fat but differ in eeyerai respects from those reported
`for the oforiéd hutilen*03.2atIOèn'cibiiptór (26-.24.,;; (cid:9)
`•-•
`Récentlj/„Liggett (32)hPS expressed the rat and the hu-
`. (cid:9).. -
`man P3-adrenoceptor in CHO cells and has determined key
`pharmacological properties in parallel studies. Typical cate-
`cholamine agonists were fund to have a similar low affinity
`for both rat and human N-adrenoceptors. In contrast to
`catecholamine agonists, differences In agonist efficacy and/
`or potency were noted for each of the non-catecholamine
`atypical agonists tested. .For example, BRL 37344* was a
`full agonist (intrinsic activity 1.0 relative.to isoprenaline) Ion
`the rat 133-adrenóceplor, but its intrinsiO activity was i7nly:
`0.60 for the human 133:adrenoceptor; elk, it as About 15
`times less potent ter the 'fnitnin than for thé fat 1334dreno-
`ceptor. The data indicate that the molecular actions of atypi-
`cal (3-adrenoceptor agonists differ markedly between spe-
`cies and so the action of atypical agonists at rodent
`133-adrenoceptors may not be predictive of therapeutic po-
`tential in humans.
`A feature of brown adipose tissue is that the response of
`the tissue to (33-agonists ihcreases on chrohie agoniat expo-.
`sure (33,34) in contrast to tissues containing predominantly
`f31- or f32-adrenobeptors which, become desensitized (35;
`36). In line with this is the recent finding that whereas both
`13i- and 112-adrenoceptOr subtypes Undergo agonist-depen-
`dent decreases in receptor expression during long-term ag-
`onist exposure, cells expressing the 133-adrenoceptor sub-
`type fail to undergo a decrease in receptor number after
`prolonged agonist exposure and, in fact, display increases
`in number over time (37). However, Revelli etal. have dem-
`onstrated that administration of the thermogianic P-adren-
`ergic agonist Ro 16-8714 (see. later) to lean and' obese
`Zucker rats induces a marked down-regulation of the
`N-adrenoceptor of the interscapular brown adipose tissue
`over a time course of 72 hours. It was proposed that the
`down-regulation of the 03-adrenoceptor observed in this
`
`.*It would appear that BRL 34377 was reported in error when BRL
`37344 was meant.
`
`study 72 hours after beginning treatment with Ro 16-8714
`is compensated in the whole animal by the trophic effect of
`the drug on the brown adipode tissue (38).
`
`Distribution of atypical f3-adrenoceptors
`
`It is now generally accepted that the (3-adrenoceptor me-
`diating lipolysis in rat white adipose tissue and oxygen con-
`sumption in brown adipose tissue is of neither the p, nor the
`52 subtype, that it is atypical, and it is being referred to.as the
`133-adrenoceptor. It is characterized by a marked respon-
`siveness to atypical 137agbnists like BRL 37344 compared
`with classical pi- and P2-agonists, and by having a low affin-
`ity for propranolol and standard Pi- and 32-antagonists:.
`In this section,' atypical P-adrenoceptors in other tissues'
`are reviewed and inevitably the question is raised as to
`whether they should be designated P3-adrenoceptors. It had
`been suggested earlier (39)' that the p, and (32 classification
`of Lands may represent two extremes ofa.varlablespec-
`trurn of different "isorepeptors", in the same way as specific./ )
`enzymes can exist in isoenzymic forms. The other atypical '
`13-adrenoceptors may be similar but not :identical to.those
`designated 03. Some authors have expressed caution at us-
`ing the specific nomenclature' J33-adrenoceptor because of
`the complexities, involved in making the assignment (40).
`On the other hand Arch (14) has suggested that this group
`of atypical .PredrenoceptorS,:having the characteristics de-
`scribed above,, will obtain their due recognition only if, they
`are described as 133-adrenoceptors. In this review the origi-
`nal authors' nomenclature of "atypical" or 133" is used. How-
`ever, the present author is clearly following Arch in grouping
`together atypical P-adrenoceptors, that is, those which do
`not fit into either the 131 or the 132 classification. Some further
`subdivision may prove necessary in the future. It is recom-
`mended that in each case the data on which the assignment
`was made be examined. The situation is complicated by the
`co-occurrence of 13.1-, 132- and atypical adrenoceptors in cer-
`tain tissues, by species differences, and, as mentioned ear-
`lier by the agonists used perhapS having different efficacies
`in different tissueS. MacKay (41) has indicated the problems( )
`that can arise in the determination of PA2 Values of antago-
`nists, and in making comparisons of values obtained by dif-
`ferent 'workers, while Jenkinson (42) his pointed out that
`there is still some confusion over terms and terminology.
`The'presence of an undefined adranobeptOr which func-
`tions to inhibit histamine-induced longitudinal muscle ten-
`sion development in the guinea pig ileum had been evident
`from the failure of propranolol to block the action of p-adre-
`noceptbr agonists. The question arose as to whether the
`adrenoceptor in the guinea pig ileum was the same as the
`P3-adrenoceptor on adipocytes. Bond and Clarke (40)
`showed that the order and relative potency of agonists at the
`ileum receptor was BRL 37344 (20) >(-)- isoprenaline (8) >
`noradrenaline (1) > adrenaline (0.5) > fenoterol (0.35) >
`(+)-isoprenaline (0.27), similar to the more restricted series
`examined by Arch et al. (20) for lipolysis in brown fat, BRL
`37344 (1) > isoprenaline (0.2) > fenoterol (0.008) and bý
`
`
`Sawai Ex. 1004
`Page 3 of 21
`
`(cid:9)
`

`

`532 (cid:9)
`
`3-Adrenergic agonists
`
`Wilson etal. (19) for lipolysisin whitept, BRL 35135 (which
`• is hydrolyzed to the active free acid BRL 37344) (1) = isopre-
`naline (1) > fenoterol (0.03). Further, the guinea pig ileum
`adrenoceptor was totally resistant to propranolol at up to 10
`p.M. Bond and Clarke refer to the guinea pig Ileum p-adreno-
`ceptor as atypical (see their expressed caution above, refer-
`ence 40) rather than fla. One important piece *of evidence
`which argues against the notion that the adipocyte and the
`Ileal receptor are the same comes from data obtained with
`propranolol. The atypical 3-adrenoceptor on fat cells is sen-
`sitive to blockade by propranolol but abnormally low pA2val-
`ues (6.2-6.6) have been reported. In contrast, the adreno-
`ceptor on guinea pig ileum is resistant to propranolol at
`concentrations that are at least 8-16 times its equilibrium
`dissociation constant for the adipocyte receptor. However,
`Bond and Clarke point out that it would be 'Premature to dis-
`criminate tile two recéptore solely wen the basis of the pro-
`pranolol result.. Blue et al. have further characterized the
`atypical13.-adrenoceptor in guinea pig ileum by showing that
`while it is resistant to antagonism by propranolol, it iš corn-
`.,_oetitively antagonized by (-)-alprenolol and (-)-dih.ydroal-
`• .`enolol with pA2 values of 6.47 and 6.43, respectively.
`nese values are much lower than those, 8.2 and 8.81, re-
`Ppectively, for antagonism at the Pradrenoceptor. (-)-Alpre-
`nolol also exerted agonist activity at the atypical 3-adreno-
`ceptor in guinea pig ileum (43). Further, in the presence of
`sufficient prcipranolol (51.1.M)to saturate 01-actrenoceptors,
`cyanopindolol gave a pA2 value of 7.63. Thus, cyanopindo-
`Id is the most potenfantagonist so far identified for the atypi-
`_ (cid:9)
`.
`
`cal P-acIFenciceptór and, in the pie. aerie-et:if PripPrario161, may
`serve as a useful probe for studies at the atypical P-adreno-
`ceptor (44).
`In rat gastric fundus, the resistance of P-adrenoceptor re-
`laxant responses to propranolol and the antagonism by cya-
`nopindolol of BRL 37344- and isoprenaline-induced re-
`sponses led McLaughlin and MacDonald to conclude that
`atypical p-adrenoceptors were present (45). The relatively
`low potency of BRL 37344 at this site compared with other
`atypical p-adrenoceptor sites may be due to differences in •
`coupling efficiericy or may indicate receptor heterogeneity.
`In guinea pig gastric fundus the relatively high potency of
`7L 35135, together with the relatively weak antagonism of
`fi-"adrenoceptor agonists by propranolol, support the pres-
`ence of atypical 3-adrenoceptors similar to those in rat adi-
`pocytes (46, 47).
`Evidence for an atypical, or 33-adrenoceptor, in ferret tra-
`cheal epitheliuni has been 'reported by Webber and Stock '
`(48). BRL 37344 was more potent by 4-5 orders of magni-
`tude than the f31-(prenalterol) and P2-(salbutamol) adreno-
`ceptor selective agonists in stimulating methacholine-in-
`' duced albumin transport. The weak antagonism óf the
`response to BRL 37344 by ICI 118551 was consistent with
`this response being mediated by an atypical 13-adrenocep-
`tor. The use of BRL 37344 has shown the presence of atypi-
`cal P-adrenoceptors on rat jejunum (49). Several (31- or
`132-agonists and antagonists were tested and it was found
`that non-selective • and selective antagonists for' Pr or
`Pradrenoceptors showed a relatively low affinity, cempared
`
`to their affinity for Pi- or Pradrenoceptors. BRL 37344 was
`more potent, although a partial agonist (60% maximal re-
`sponse), compared to isoprenaline; whereas it was clearly
`less potent than isoprenaline on pi- or 32-adrenoceptors.
`BRL 37344 and BRL 35135 have been used to provide ev-
`idence that an atypical P-adrenoceptor is present in guinea
`pig bronchi (50). BRL 35135 reduced non-adrenergic
`non-cholinergic contractions induced by electrical field stim-
`ulation and this inhibitory effect of BRL 35135 was not signif-
`icantly altered by non-selective or PI-selective antagonists.
`While BRL 35135 inhibited the contractile response to elec-
`trical field stimulation, it did not inhibit the contractile re-
`sponse to exogenous substance P, which led to the sugges-
`tion that it elicits its inhibitor/ effects pre-junctionally on
`neuronal terminals rather than-post-junctionally on the ta-
`chykinin receptors of airway smooth muscles.
`Just as the Beecham ..BRL. compounds have contributed
`to the identification of, atypical P-adrenoceptors, so has a
`group of phenylethanolaminotetralines reported by the Sa-
`nofi Group, e.g. SR 58306A (51), SR' 58539B (52) and SR
`58611A (53). In vitro, SR 58306A, 'unlike isoprenaline and
`the 32-selective agonists saibutarnol and ritodrine, potently
`inhibited rat colon spontaneous contraction at concentra-
`tions substantially lower than those only partially relaxing
`the guinea pig trachea; also, it had no chronotropic action on
`guinea pig atria. 3-Selective agonists were used as compa-
`rators because they had shown proniise for treating condi-
`tions of abnormally enhanced gastrointestinal motility; they
`could not be used therapeutically because of their concur-,
`rent cardiovascular effects. Non-selective -a renergic an-
`tagonists competitively antagonized the action of SR
`58306A on the colon, which was not prevented by selective
`pi- or 32-antagonists. Only alprenolol competitively antago-
`nized the action of isoprenalindon the.colon; antagonism by
`either pindolol or propranolol was non-competitive. The re-
`'suits suggested that compounds such as SR 58306A inhibit
`colonic motility by selectively stimulating atypical p-adreno-
`ceptors, while isoprenaline interacts also with (31- and
`132-adrenoceptors which coexist with the atypical P-adreno-
`ceptor in rat colon. In vivo, the minimal effective i.v. dose of
`SF1'58539B for raising heart rate was five times its ED50 for
`Inhibition of colon motility; at this multiple of ED 50 it caused
`a rise in blood pressure. SR 58611A was the most selective
`potent compound of those studied in vitro on rat colon, rat
`uterus and guinea pig atrium.
`The phenylethanolaminotetralines were tested for their
`ability to induce lipolysis in rat white adipocyles (54, 55).
`There was a good correlation (r = 0.97) between the lipolytic
`EC50s of (-)- and (+)-isoprenaline and several phenyletha-
`nolaminotetralines and their inhibition of rat colon motility,
`suggesting that receptors of the same type, may account for
`their actions on both preparations. McLaughlin and MacDo-
`nald (56) investigated the responses to noradrenaline, iso-
`prenaline and BRL 37344 in the rat distal colon in vitro and
`provided a further link between the effects of BRL 37344 and
`the Sanofi compounds. Relaxant responses to BRL 37344
`were only weakly antagonized by propranolol. Responses
`to isoprenaline, resistant to propranolol antagonism, were
`antagonized in the presence of propranolol by cyanopindo-
`
`Druc
`
`301 (r
`for e
`corn
`that
`ea r
`bind
`iden
`clea
`The
`ity
`
`char
`The
`(36)
`(2),
`01 (0
`usw
`mall
`cyar
`the
`Eft
`tion
`was
`anta
`sum
`ularl
`tors
`that
`is m
`the
`not t
`tors
`lar, r
`SI
`sant
`nize
`was
`sugç,
`dent
`At
`in re
`smo
`dog
`13-ae
`tion
`3-ac
`
`33-A
`
`Tt
`33-a
`(20)
`infla
`they
`Pate
`may
`glau
`• perc
`
`Sawai Ex. 1004
`Page 4 of 21
`
`

`

`Drugs Fut 1993, 18(6)
`
`533
`
`lol (pA2 7.12), which had earlier been suggested as a probe
`for atypical 0-adrenoceptors. (44). Manara et al. (57) have
`compared inter alla SR 58539B with BRL 37344 and shown
`that the former has the greater rat colon to rat uterus or guin-
`ea pig atrium selectivitY. The same group has carried out
`binding assays with [31-1]-dihYdroalprenolol and has failed to
`identify sites cOrrespcindind to the atypical P-adrenoceptors
`clearly evidenced by theirfunctional studies in rat Colon (58).
`The identification of a radioligand with sufficiently high affin-
`ity for atypical receptors is of paramount importance.
`An atypical P-adrerrocé0tor in rat esophagus has been
`characterized using agonist and antagonist probes (59, 60).
`The order and relativity of agonist potency was BRL 37344
`(36) > (-)-isoprenaline (7) > SR 58611A (5) > (-)-adrenaline •
`(2) > (-)- noradrenaline (1)>•(+)-iioprénaline (0.2) > ferioter-'
`ol(0.02). The receptcir site in rat eiephagüi exhibited an'un-
`usually low 'affinity ter Propren-oloi cOMPared with that nor-
`mally obtained at cladsical P-adrenoCeptbrd. The failure of
`cyanopindolol to antagonize (-)-isoprénalina suggested that
`.
`.. (cid:9)
`the site;may differ frcirn PtherItyPicel -ad
`Both SR 58611A and BRL 37344 stimulated acid séCre:
`tion in rat sternach in vitrò (61). The response to SR 58611A
`was reduced by pr'Oprarrolol but riot by ß1- Or N-Selective
`antagon fits. The lack 6f effect of alprenolol was considered
`surprising:Thid eigéiii had togen" piit'ted earlier to be Partic-
`ularly effective (but not 'selective for) atypical P-adrenocep-
`tors (43). In a siMilar, type of •Study, the samegroup showed
`that stimulation of biCarbonate Secretion in cecUrn In vitro
`is mediated by atYpical f3'adri3n6Ceritors (62). In this case
`the response t6 SR 68611A WaS reduced bY alprenolol but
`•
`.
`• not by Proprenolol, indicatingffiet the atypicel13"-dretiócep- .
`tors mediating the two secretory processes, although simi-
`lar, may not be identical.
`SR 58611A has been reported to have an antidepres-
`sant-like effect in rodents (63). The effect was not antago-
`nized by selective (cid:9)
`a-Afib- Onisii, but
`was blocked by high doses of proPranolol and alprenolol,
`suggesting the presence of atypical P-adrenoceptors in ro-
`dent brain.
`Atypical P-adrenoceptors may also 'occur in rat liver (26),
`.in rat soleus muscle (64), In the heart (65), in the circular
`smooth muscle layers of the human colon (66) and in the
`dog hind limb (67). The antinocicéptive action of several
`fš-adrenoceptor agonists in the' mouse abdominal constric-
`tion test has been attributed to stimulation of atypical
`13-adrenoceptors (68).
`
`•
`
`j33-Adrinoceptor agonistd as potential drugs
`
`Therapeutic areas where it has been suggested that
`133-adrenoceptor agonists may provide drugs are obesity
`(20), diabetes (69), intestinal hypermotility disorders (54),
`inflammatory airways disease (48) and depression .(63);
`they may. also provide locally acting analgesic drugs (68).
`Patent applications suggest that 33-adrenergic agonists
`may be used in the treatment of ocular hypertension and
`glaircoma (70), hypertension (71), hypertriglyceridemia, hy-
`percholesterolemia and atherosclerosis (72), and may also
`
`be used as topical antiinflammatory agents and platelet ag-
`gregation Inhibitors (73). Work in the first three of these
`areas has yielded novel compounds with selectivity for the
`133-adreneceptor which have not only been used as tools to
`help characterize thei33-adrenoceptor, as discussed above,
`but have been considered worthy of clinical investigation.
`None is as yet generally available for hunian use. Thé plan
`is now to discuss these compoundd principally under the
`heading of the therapeutic area in which they originated.
`
`Thermogenid drugs for the treatment of obesity and
`diabetes
`
`A thermogenic function Was first ascribed to brown adjs.,
`pose tiésue (BAT) in 1963 (74). BAT appeers to be present
`in most, .if .nol all 'mamrrials, but rarely accOunts for r+tore
`than 2% of body weight (7). Initially its heat Producing func-
`tion was believed to be of importance only in certain species
`as part of the process . of non-shivering thermogenesis
`(NST) during arousal from hibernation, during acclimation
`to cold or duririgthe neonatal period (76-78): It was not until
`1978 that BAT was established as the major but not neces-
`sarily the. exclusive : site of . NST in rodents- .(79-81):. In
`cold-adapted rats it was shown that during maximal nora-
`drenaline stimulation the blood flow to BAT is'equiyaleht to
`one-third of the cardiac output and, from measurements of
`oxygen extraction by BAT, it was shown that this tissue Could
`account for over 60% 6f NST. Cold-adepted rate have an in-
`creased turnover and urinary exCretion 'of' nóradrenaline,
`show an enhanced thermogenic reSponse to catechola-
`Mines, and hypertrophy and hyperplasia of • BAT is ob-
`served. The high metabolic rate of these animals can be In-
`hibited by I3-adrenergic blockade (82, 83). NST has been
`observed in larger adult mammals, including man (84).
`Non-shivering heat en:Ai:lotion depends on the oxidation
`of prirriarily fettY acidd bý BAT: The Capacity of the tissue for
`thermogenesls is dependent upon a 'proton conductance'
`pathway. which is associated with an inner mitochondria'
`membrane 'uncoupling' protein unique to brown fat. Ther-
`mogenesis in BAT is initiated by the sympathetic.rel ease of
`noradrenaline which acts predominantly via j3-adrenocep-
`tors, now designated 133-adrenoceptors, to cause an activa-
`tion of adenyl cyclase which, by increasing the concentra-
`tion of cAMP, stimulates a hormone sensitive lipase thereby
`releasing free fatty acids. These act both as the substrate for
`13-oxidation and to override the control exerted on respire- .
`• tion by purine nucleotides binding to the GDP.- binding pro-
`tein thermogenin (uncoupling protein), thereby uncoupling
`ATP synthesis from respiration.
`Uncoupling protein has a high affinity for purine nucleo-
`tides and the specific binding of GDP is used to Monitor the
`activity of the proton conductance pathway. In rats, where
`the activity of the BAT mitochondrial proton conductance
`pathway is low, a proportion of the uncoupling protein is
`'masked' and unable to bind GDP. However, on activation of
`the proton conductance pathway, GDP-binding sites are
`'unmasked'. Therefore, GDP-binding In isolated mitochon-
`dria reflects the thermogenic status of BAT (85).
`A phenomenon which shares many of the features of
`cold-induced NST is diet-induced thermogéneSis (DIT),
`
`Sawai Ex. 1004
`Page 5 of 21
`
`

`

`. (cid:9)
`
`534 (cid:9)
`
`13-Adrencirgi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket