throbber
8/20/2018
`
`Unified Patents Inc. Mail - [Employees] Late June 2018 Newsletter
`
`Jonathan Stroud <jonathan@unifiedpatents.com>
`
`[Employees] Late June 2018 Newsletter
`6 messages
`
`Unified Patents <shawn@unifiedpatents.com>
`Reply­To: us7­5185037164­9f06ef646e@conversation01.mailchimpapp.com
`To: employees@unifiedpatents.com
`
`Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:01 PM
`
`Newsletter 
`June 2018
`
`GOT UNIFIED?
`
`Federal Circuit Summarily Affirms Unified's IPR against Acacia
`Research Entity
`
`On June 19, 2018, The United States
`Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`summarily affirmed the PTAB's
`decision to hold all challenged claims
`https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5dd1963617&jsver=PZY5abr1U30.en.&cbl=gmail_fe_180814.14_p4&view=pt&q=%22universal%20secure%20registry… 1/4
`
`UNIFIED-USR-00001
`
`IPR2018-00067
`Unified EX1041 Page 1
`
`

`

`8/20/2018
`
`Unified Patents Inc. Mail - [Employees] Late June 2018 Newsletter
`of Unified's IPR petition against US
`Patent 9,043,093, unpatentable. 
`
` 
`
`The Acacia Research Corp. subsidiary has asserted the patent, which relates to
`single side curtain airbag for vehicles against a number of automotive companies
`including Honda, Nissan, Toyota and Hyundai. The infringement case is currently
`stayed in the Eastern District of Michigan.
`
`Red River Innovations in a Drought as Patent Looks Invalid
`
` 
`
`Congratulations to our contest winner Rajesh Singh, who won $2000 for his prior art
`submission.  The Red River Innovations patent, relating to information processing on
`a computer, was previously named EFF's "Stupid Patent of the Month" and has been
`asserted multiple time in district court. Thank you to the other quality submissions. 
`Be sure to check out our other contests for your chance to win! Review winning prior
`art here.
`
`200+  
`MEMBERS
`
` 
`
`8  
`ZONES
`
` 
`
`108  
`CHALLENGES
`
` 
`
`PTAB  
`ANALYTICS
`
`Barkan Wireless Patent Challenged as Likely Invalid
`
` 
`
`On June 1, Unified filed a petition for IPR against a patent directed to an 'add­on
`base station' in a cellular network, that has been asserted in district court litigation
`against Verizon and Samsung. 
`
`EXPLORE OUR UPCOMING
`EVENTS
`
` 
`
`Win $2000 for Prior Art on Electronic Communication
`Technologies
`
`https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5dd1963617&jsver=PZY5abr1U30.en.&cbl=gmail_fe_180814.14_p4&view=pt&q=%22universal%20secure%20registry… 2/4
`
` 
`
`UNIFIED-USR-00002
`
`IPR2018-00067
`Unified EX1041 Page 2
`
`

`

`8/20/2018
`
`Unified Patents Inc. Mail - [Employees] Late June 2018 Newsletter
`Submit prior art in a PATROLL contest against an ECT, formerly Eclipse IP,
`patent asserted over 200 times and relating to order tracking and navigation.  
`
` 
`
`Learn More
`
`Universal Secure Registry Patent Determined to be Likely
`Invalid
`
` 
`
`On May 3, Unified's IPR was instituted on a patent related to authenticating a user to
`a user device using biometric and secret information, and has been asserted against
`Apple and Visa. 
`
`Help kill bad patents and make money! 
`Contests added weekly.
` 
`
`Owner
`
`Technology
`
`Prize
`
`eCeipt LLC
`
`POS computer systems
`
`Blue Spike, LLC
`
`Secure personal content server
`
`BE Labs
`
`Wireless multimedia system
`
`Dynamic Applets Techs
`
`Dynamically generated executable applets
`
`MOAEC Technologies
`
`Digital music storage
`
`$2000
`
`$3000
`
`$3000
`
`$2000
`
`$2000
`
` 
`
`You are receiving this because we have worked with you in the past  
` 
`Unsubscribe | Update your profile | Forward to a friend | View online  
` 
`Unified Patents  
`2 North 1st Street. 5th Floor 
`https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5dd1963617&jsver=PZY5abr1U30.en.&cbl=gmail_fe_180814.14_p4&view=pt&q=%22universal%20secure%20registry… 3/4
`
`UNIFIED-USR-00003
`
`IPR2018-00067
`Unified EX1041 Page 3
`
`

`

`8/20/2018
`
`Unified Patents Inc. Mail - [Employees] Late June 2018 Newsletter
`
`San Jose, CA 95113 
` 
`+1 (650) 999­0899  
`info@unifiedpatents.com  
` 
`Copyright © 2018 Unified Patents. All Rights Reserved. 
` 
`
`Unified Patents <shawn@unifiedpatents.com>
`Reply­To: us7­5185037164­9f06ef646e@conversation01.mailchimpapp.com
`To: bills@unifiedpatents.com
`
`Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:01 PM
`
`[Quoted text hidden]
`
`Unified Patents <shawn@unifiedpatents.com>
`Reply­To: us7­5185037164­9f06ef646e@conversation01.mailchimpapp.com
`To: jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:01 PM
`
`[Quoted text hidden]
`
`Unified Patents <shawn@unifiedpatents.com>
`Reply­To: us7­5185037164­9f06ef646e@conversation01.mailchimpapp.com
`To: legal@unifiedpatents.com
`
`Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:01 PM
`
`[Quoted text hidden]
`­­  
`CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED 
`
`Unified Patents <shawn@unifiedpatents.com>
`Reply­To: us7­5185037164­9f06ef646e@conversation01.mailchimpapp.com
`To: team@unifiedpatents.com
`
`Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:01 PM
`
`[Quoted text hidden]
`
`Shawn Ambwani <shawn@unifiedpatents.com>
`To: Christine <christine@unifiedpatents.com>
`Cc: Unified Patents Team <team@unifiedpatents.com>
`
`Christine.   Great job on taking ownership of this and getting input and completed. 
`[Quoted text hidden]
`
`Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 9:56 PM
`
`https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=5dd1963617&jsver=PZY5abr1U30.en.&cbl=gmail_fe_180814.14_p4&view=pt&q=%22universal%20secure%20registry… 4/4
`
`UNIFIED-USR-00004
`
`IPR2018-00067
`Unified EX1041 Page 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket