throbber
Paper No. 35
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`UNIVERSAL SECURE REGISTRY LLC
`Patent Owner
`________________
`
`Case IPR2018-00067
`U.S. Patent No. 8,577,813
`________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64
`
`
`06943-00002/10536138.1
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00067
`U.S. Patent No. 8,577,813
`
`
`
`
` Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Universal Secure Registry LLC (“Patent
`
`Owner”) submits the following objections to evidence that Petitioner Unified Patents
`
`Inc. (“Petitioner”) served in its Petitioner’s Response in Opposition to Patent
`
`Owner’s Contingent Motion to Amend (Paper 34). These objections are timely filed
`
`and served within five business days of Petitioner Response.
`
`Objections
`
`Patent Owner objects to this exhibit because it includes
`information that is not discussed sufficiently in the Petition.
`Admissibility of such declaration would permit the use of
`declarations to circumvent page limits that apply to petitions.
`
`FRE 602, 702, 703: Patent Owner objects to this exhibit to
`the extent it is irrelevant, the testimony is based on a lack of
`personal knowledge or speculation, includes insufficient
`facts or data, is not based on a reliable foundation, and
`constitutes conclusory opinions without sufficient support.
`For example, Exhibit 1022 includes repeated assertions that
`its proposed modifications to the prior art would have
`required “only minor modifications,” would have involved
`“well-known” techniques, benefits or modification, and
`would have “enhanced” security, without any basis, evidence
`or support for these claims. For example, USR objects to the
`following paragraphs: ¶¶ 4, 6, 8, 12, 16-17, 22-23, 27-28, 33-
`34, 38-41, 45.
`
`Patent Owner also objects to this exhibit to the extent it relies
`upon exhibits that Patent Owner objected to in its Corrected
`Patent Owner’s Objection to Evidence (Paper No. 18) and
`for which Petitioner did not timely submit any supplemental
`evidence, including Exhibits 1008-1009 and 1011-1018.
`
`FRE 401, 402, and 403: Patent Owner objects to this
`exhibit because it is not relied on as a reference and is
`
`Evidence
`
`Exhibit 1022
`
`Exhibit 1026
`
`06943-00002/10536138.1
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00067
`U.S. Patent No. 8,577,813
`
`
`
`
` Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`
`irrelevant, and its probative value is substantially outweighed
`by a danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, wasting
`time, and needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.
`Petitioner does not allege that the challenged claims are
`anticipated or obvious based on this exhibit, or that the claim
`at issue in Exhibit 1026 are the same as those in the ’813
`patent. Instead, Petitioner uses it to make misleading and
`inaccurate characterizations about a pending application
`involving different claims.
`
`FRE 401, 402, and 403: Patent Owner objects to these
`exhibits because they are not cited and discussed in the
`Petition, are not relied on as a reference and are irrelevant,
`and their probative value is substantially outweighed by a
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, wasting
`time, and needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.
`
`FRE 901: Patent owner also objects to Exhibits 1027 and
`1031 as unauthenticated documents that are not self-
`authenticating under FRE 902. Thus, Exhibits 1027 and
`1031 lack authentication.
`
`Patent Owner further objects to Exhibits 1027 and 1031 to
`the extent that Petitioner attempts to rely on these exhibits as
`prior art or to show the alleged state of the art or
`understanding of a “PHOSITA.” Petitioner has not
`demonstrated Exhibits 1027 and 1031 are “printed
`publication” within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and
`311(b).
`
`
`Exhibit 1027-
`1031
`
`
`06943-00002/10536138.1
`
`

`

`
`
` Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ James Glass
`Registration No. 46,729
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
`Sullivan LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`Tel. (212) 849-7000
`Fax. (212) 849 7100
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner Universal Secure
`Registry LLC
`
`Case IPR2018-00067
`U.S. Patent No. 8,577,813
`
`
`Date: November 16, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`06943-00002/10536138.1
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00067
`U.S. Patent No. 8,577,813
`
`
`
`
` Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing Patent Owner’s
`
`Objections to Evidence were served on counsel of record for the Petitioner on
`
`November 16, 2018, at the following addresses:
`
`Lead Counsel
`Jason R. Mudd (Reg. No. 57,700)
`jason.mudd@eriseip.com
`ptab@eriseip.com Postal and Hand-
`Delivery Address: ERISE IP, P.A.
`6201 College Blvd., Suite 300
`Overland Park, Kansas 66211
`Telephone: (913) 777-5600
`
`
`
`Date: November 16, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`06943-00002/10536138.1
`
`Back-Up Counsel
`Roshan Mansinghani (Re. No. 62,429)
`roshan@unifiedpatents.com Postal and
`Hand-Delivery Address: Unified Patents
`Inc. 13355 Noel Road, Suite 1100
`Dallas, TX, 75240 Telephone: (214)
`945-0200
`
`Eric A. Buresh (Reg. No. 50,394)
`eric.buresh@eriseip.com
`ptab@eriseip.com Postal and Hand-
`Delivery Address: ERISE IP, P.A. 6201
`College Blvd., Suite 300 Overland Park,
`Kansas 66211 Telephone: (913) 777-
`5600
`
`Jonathan Stroud (Reg. No. 72,518)
`jonathan@unifiedpatents.com Postal
`and Hand-Delivery Address: Unified
`Patents Inc. 1875 Connecticut Ave. NW,
`Floor 10 Washington, D.C. 20009
`Telephone: (202) 805-8931
`
`Signed: /James M. Glass/
` James M. Glass
` Registration No. 46,729
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Universal Secure Registry LLC
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket