`
`
`
`____________________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`____________________
`
`
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`VILOX TECHNOLOGIES LLC.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`____________________
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`
`____________________
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. JOSEPH L. DE BELLLIS
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 1 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`I make this Declaration in support of Patent Owner’s Response in the matter of
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Petition IPR2018-00044 (Petition).
`
`I am not being compensated for this Declaration.
`
`I am the sole inventor of U.S. Patent 7,302,423 (‘423 Patent). In addition, I am the
`
`sole inventor, or one of two inventors, of six additional U.S. Patents and two
`
`pending patent applications, all of which relate in some manner to the ‘423 Patent.
`
`I am the owner of Vilox Technologies LLC, to which all patents and patent
`
`applications are assigned.
`
`4.
`
`In preparing this Declaration, I reviewed the Petition; Exhibit 1011 thereto,
`
`Declaration of Ingrid Hsieh-Yee, Ph.D.; Exhibit 1005 thereto, Declaration of Philip
`
`Greenspun, Ph.D.; and Exhibit 1009 thereto, Excel 2000 Bible (Excel).
`
`5.
`
`In addition to being an inventor or co-inventor of seven U.S. Patents, I am the
`
`founder and owner of Vilox LLC, of Louisville, Kentucky. Vilox LLC manufactured
`
`commercial embodiments of the patented technology claimed in the seven U.S.
`
`Patents, and sold products to private entities and government organizations.
`
`6.
`
`I have attended several in-person interviews at the U.S. Patent Office during
`
`examination of my U.S. Patents and patent applications.
`
`7.
`
`I have been informed of and understand the relevant statutory basis for
`
`determining the priority date for a U.S. Patent. I am familiar with the terms
`
`“conception,” “diligence,” and “reduction to practice.” I am familiar with the basis
`
`for establishing a prior art date for a reference, and application of prior art
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 2 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`II.
`
`8.
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`references generally in determining the validity of a U.S. Patent. I also have been
`
`informed of and understand the concept of “swearing behind a reference.” Finally,
`
`I understand the notions of novelty and nonobviousness when determining the
`
`validity of a U.S. Patent.
`
`CONCEPTION OF MY INVENTIONS
`
`After reviewing the Petition and the Declaration of Dr. Hseih-Yee (Ex 1011), I
`
`understand the Petitioner asserts the Excel 2000 Bible reference (Ex 1009) has a
`
`“prior art date” of “between July 27, 1999 and October 26, 1999,” although the
`
`actual copy of the reference considered by Dr. Hseih-Yee may not have been
`
`shelved until late December 1999 (60 days after October 26, 1999). See Ex 1011,
`
`paragraphs 17, 20. I understand from the Declaration of Dr. Greenspun (Ex 1005)
`
`that the Petitioner states the priority date of my ‘423 Patent is “as early as February
`
`25, 2000.” See Ex 1005, paragraph 24. I also understand from the Petition that
`
`the Petitioner alleges the Excel 2000 Bible reference is “approximately 5 months
`
`prior art.” See Petition at 48. The date on which the Excel 2000 Bible was actually
`
`accessible is not clear based on Petitioner’s positions, but all the dates are after I
`
`conceived of the inventions disclosed and claimed in the ‘423 Patent.
`
`9.
`
`I conceived of the inventions disclosed in my U.S. Patents, including the ‘423
`
`Patent, at least as early as January 1999. It was in January 1999 that I described
`
`to my Office Manager at that time, Missy De Bellis, my vision for a database
`
`management product that would be intuitive and flexible, which I came to call my
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 3 of 23
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`
`
`“search-on-the-fly” system. My intention was to design such a system for use in
`
`my medical practice.
`
`10.
`
`The system I described to Ms. De Bellis was one whereby a user could search
`
`large amounts of data across various databases organized in various ways such
`
`that the system would not only return all available results, but also would display
`
`all of the results on one page. To allow the user to view all the available results, I
`
`envisioned using truncation to reduce, as necessary, results to representations
`
`that would trigger and take advantage of the user’s power of recognition. I further
`
`described a system that would allow users to search beginning with criteria of their
`
`choice but with options to filter using other criteria so that the search process would
`
`be more intuitive for the user. To do this, I envisioned a database as a three-
`
`dimensional body having a number of faces or panes; each face representing a
`
`view into the database. I further envisioned increasing the number of panes,
`
`changing, for example, a cubic form database to something like a geodesic dome;
`
`the greater the number of “panes” (parses), the more granular the search
`
`capability. I explained that using these concepts, we could “drill down” on data
`
`across multiple databases in what I referred to as a “hyper-specific” parsing of the
`
`available data. The truncation of the alpha-numeric spectrum would then allow
`
`results to be reduced to a single-page view so that the extremes of the spectrum
`
`could be appreciated by the user.
`
`11.
`
`I explained to Ms. De Bellis that by using the system and methods described
`
`above, we would have much better visibility into the data for a given patient. In
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 4 of 23
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`
`
`essence, she, as Office Manager, would be able to roll and tumble the data across
`
`our multiple databases, or search on the fly. Our software then would truncate
`
`search results, as necessary, so that she could view all search results on one page
`
`of the terminal, which would allow her to recognize the results.
`
`12. After unsuccessful attempts to modify off-the-shelf software products to implement
`
`my search-on-the-fly concepts, I began efforts to design such a software tool in
`
`May 1999. I initially focused development on icon manipulation, faceted search,
`
`truncation, and related database tools.
`
`13.
`
`I continued working on developing a system that embodied my search-on-the-fly
`
`concepts throughout the summer of 1999. Late May through September was the
`
`busiest time of the year for my medical practice due to the large influx of people
`
`into the Hamptons in the summer months. I nevertheless continued to work on
`
`developing the search-on-the-fly system when I was not in surgery or seeing
`
`patients. I found the progress to be slow and frustrating, in part because I had no
`
`training or background as a software programmer or engineer.
`
`14.
`
`In August 1999, I first discussed by inventive concepts with Adriano Freire, whom
`
`I had originally employed for other purposes, but who was a computer programmer
`
`in his native country of Brazil. Mr. Freire subsequently became a co-inventor on
`
`my U.S. Patent 7,188,100.
`
`15. My initial efforts with Mr. Freire were directed to writing software programs that
`
`would bring my inventive concepts to life. Those efforts included Mr. Freire writing
`
`computer code that would accomplish my intentions. To that end, I purchased
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 5 of 23
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`
`
`computer hardware and related devices to execute the code Mr. Freire was writing.
`
`Many of these purchases were made on behalf of my medical practice by my Office
`
`Manager, Missy De Bellis.
`
`16.
`
`I also was encouraged at this time to form a software company that could market
`
`the software products I was developing, should they prove to be successful. On
`
`October 14, 1999, I formed Virtual Logistix, Inc. to produce and market the
`
`software products.
`
`17. As mentioned above, to support the development of the search-on-the-fly system,
`
`I purchased computer hardware and related devices and computer software that
`
`Mr. Freire used for the software development efforts. For example, I purchased
`
`an Apple computer and related devices on September 27, 1999 and a jaz drive to
`
`back up our work on October 5, 1999. I also purchased other computer-related
`
`products and services, as can be seen in a copy of a credit card statement, which
`
`shows purchases from September 27, 1999 through December 17, 1999, and in a
`
`number of invoices for computer equipment (hardware and software) to allow
`
`software development, testing, and operation. See Figures 1 - 12 below for these
`
`purchases. Figure 4, for example, shows purchase of a Visual Basic tool for
`
`software development.
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 6 of 23
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 1.
`
`Credit Card Statement
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 7 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 2.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 09/27/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 8 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 3.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/05/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 9 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 4.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/09/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 10 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 5.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/13/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 11 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 6.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/15/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 12 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 7.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/20/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 13 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 8.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/05/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 14 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 9.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/18/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 15 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 10. Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/29/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 16 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 11. Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/25/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 17 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 12. Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/05/1999
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18.
`
`In September 1999, I concluded that the software programs could be marketable
`
`and determined that I should seek patent protection. In early October 1999, I
`
`spoke with Walter Mondale, at the time a partner at Dorsey & Whitney LLP in
`
`Minneapolis, MN, and asked his advice as to how I should go about obtaining
`
`patent protection. Mr. Mondale was about to travel to Los Angeles to be the
`
`keynote speaker at an event put on by the International Campaign for Tibet to
`
`honor the Dalai Lama and others. Since Eleanor Mondale and I also were going
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 18 of 23
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`
`
`to the same event, we decided to discuss the matter in person in Los Angeles.
`
`When we met, Mr. Mondale offered to arrange for a Dorsey & Whitney patent
`
`attorney to contact me. Below is a picture (Figure 13) of me, Eleanor Mondale, the
`
`Dalai Lama, and Walter Mondale at the October 11, 1999 event.
`
`
`
`Figure 13. Honoring the Dalai Lama with Former Vice-President Walter Mondale
`
`19. Mr. Mondale said he would have a Dorsey & Whitney LLP patent attorney contact
`
`me to discuss obtaining patent protection. I had that telephone conversation on
`
`October 28, 1999, and sent Dorsey & Whitney LLP a retainer check for $1,000 on
`
`November 1. Below are (1) a copy of the retainer check (Figure 14) and (2) a copy
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 19 of 23
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`of portions of my telephone bill (Figure 15) showing a 31-minute call to Dorsey &
`
`Whitney’s Washington, D.C. office on October 28, 1999.
`
`Figure 14. Retainer Check
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 20 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 15. AT&T Phone Bill
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 21 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`
`20.
`
`Throughout this time, I continued work on developing my search-on-the-fly
`
`systems. We eventually built a prototype of the system. Throughout the
`
`development process, I showed our progress to my Office Manager. I also
`
`demonstrated the prototypes to her as they were developed.
`
`21.
`
`I met with two patent attorneys from Dorsey & Whitney LLP in my Southampton,
`
`New York office on December 9, 1999. I specifically recall that the meeting was
`
`on a Thursday because I regularly spent Wednesday in my New York City office,
`
`but I canceled those office hours to prepare for the meeting. I recall that the
`
`meeting was on the first Thursday in December, which was December 9.
`
`22. At the December 9, 1999 meeting, I demonstrated a prototype of my search-on-
`
`the-fly system that I had developed with Mr. Freire. The prototype used a database
`
`that Mr. Freire had created consisting of phone book records. I had shown this
`
`prototype to my Office Manager, who by that point, was also employed by Virtual
`
`Logistix.
`
`23. After the December 9, 1999 meeting, Mr. Freire and I copied the system we
`
`demonstrated onto a CD. On December 28, 1999, we sent that CD to Dorsey &
`
`Whitney. A copy of the letter, which bears my signature, forwarding the CD is
`
`being concurrently submitted with my declaration as Exhibit 2026.
`
`24. Dorsey & Whitney filed my first patent application, now U.S. Patent 6,760,720, on
`
`February 25, 2000. Screenshots from the system I demonstrated during the
`
`December 1999 were incorporated into drawings in the first application from which
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 22 of 23
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 6,760,720 issued. One such screenshot is Fig. 10, which is
`
`reproduced as Exhibit 2025 being concurrently submitted with my declaration.
`
`25. Subsequently, on August 24, 2000, Dorsey & Whitney filed Provisional Application
`
`60/227,305, and on August 24, 2001 filed Non-provisional Application 09/935,565,
`
`which claims priority to the Provisional Application and is a Continuation-in-Part of
`
`09/513,340, now U.S. Patent 6,760,720.
`
`26.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein based on my own knowledge are true
`
`and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I made all statements with the
`
`knowledge that willful false statements are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or
`
`both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date July 8, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 23 of 23
`
`