throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`____________________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`____________________
`
`
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`VILOX TECHNOLOGIES LLC.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`____________________
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`
`____________________
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. JOSEPH L. DE BELLLIS
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 1 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`I make this Declaration in support of Patent Owner’s Response in the matter of
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Petition IPR2018-00044 (Petition).
`
`I am not being compensated for this Declaration.
`
`I am the sole inventor of U.S. Patent 7,302,423 (‘423 Patent). In addition, I am the
`
`sole inventor, or one of two inventors, of six additional U.S. Patents and two
`
`pending patent applications, all of which relate in some manner to the ‘423 Patent.
`
`I am the owner of Vilox Technologies LLC, to which all patents and patent
`
`applications are assigned.
`
`4.
`
`In preparing this Declaration, I reviewed the Petition; Exhibit 1011 thereto,
`
`Declaration of Ingrid Hsieh-Yee, Ph.D.; Exhibit 1005 thereto, Declaration of Philip
`
`Greenspun, Ph.D.; and Exhibit 1009 thereto, Excel 2000 Bible (Excel).
`
`5.
`
`In addition to being an inventor or co-inventor of seven U.S. Patents, I am the
`
`founder and owner of Vilox LLC, of Louisville, Kentucky. Vilox LLC manufactured
`
`commercial embodiments of the patented technology claimed in the seven U.S.
`
`Patents, and sold products to private entities and government organizations.
`
`6.
`
`I have attended several in-person interviews at the U.S. Patent Office during
`
`examination of my U.S. Patents and patent applications.
`
`7.
`
`I have been informed of and understand the relevant statutory basis for
`
`determining the priority date for a U.S. Patent. I am familiar with the terms
`
`“conception,” “diligence,” and “reduction to practice.” I am familiar with the basis
`
`for establishing a prior art date for a reference, and application of prior art
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 2 of 23
`
`

`

`
`
`II.
`
`8.
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`references generally in determining the validity of a U.S. Patent. I also have been
`
`informed of and understand the concept of “swearing behind a reference.” Finally,
`
`I understand the notions of novelty and nonobviousness when determining the
`
`validity of a U.S. Patent.
`
`CONCEPTION OF MY INVENTIONS
`
`After reviewing the Petition and the Declaration of Dr. Hseih-Yee (Ex 1011), I
`
`understand the Petitioner asserts the Excel 2000 Bible reference (Ex 1009) has a
`
`“prior art date” of “between July 27, 1999 and October 26, 1999,” although the
`
`actual copy of the reference considered by Dr. Hseih-Yee may not have been
`
`shelved until late December 1999 (60 days after October 26, 1999). See Ex 1011,
`
`paragraphs 17, 20. I understand from the Declaration of Dr. Greenspun (Ex 1005)
`
`that the Petitioner states the priority date of my ‘423 Patent is “as early as February
`
`25, 2000.” See Ex 1005, paragraph 24. I also understand from the Petition that
`
`the Petitioner alleges the Excel 2000 Bible reference is “approximately 5 months
`
`prior art.” See Petition at 48. The date on which the Excel 2000 Bible was actually
`
`accessible is not clear based on Petitioner’s positions, but all the dates are after I
`
`conceived of the inventions disclosed and claimed in the ‘423 Patent.
`
`9.
`
`I conceived of the inventions disclosed in my U.S. Patents, including the ‘423
`
`Patent, at least as early as January 1999. It was in January 1999 that I described
`
`to my Office Manager at that time, Missy De Bellis, my vision for a database
`
`management product that would be intuitive and flexible, which I came to call my
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 3 of 23
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`
`
`“search-on-the-fly” system. My intention was to design such a system for use in
`
`my medical practice.
`
`10.
`
`The system I described to Ms. De Bellis was one whereby a user could search
`
`large amounts of data across various databases organized in various ways such
`
`that the system would not only return all available results, but also would display
`
`all of the results on one page. To allow the user to view all the available results, I
`
`envisioned using truncation to reduce, as necessary, results to representations
`
`that would trigger and take advantage of the user’s power of recognition. I further
`
`described a system that would allow users to search beginning with criteria of their
`
`choice but with options to filter using other criteria so that the search process would
`
`be more intuitive for the user. To do this, I envisioned a database as a three-
`
`dimensional body having a number of faces or panes; each face representing a
`
`view into the database. I further envisioned increasing the number of panes,
`
`changing, for example, a cubic form database to something like a geodesic dome;
`
`the greater the number of “panes” (parses), the more granular the search
`
`capability. I explained that using these concepts, we could “drill down” on data
`
`across multiple databases in what I referred to as a “hyper-specific” parsing of the
`
`available data. The truncation of the alpha-numeric spectrum would then allow
`
`results to be reduced to a single-page view so that the extremes of the spectrum
`
`could be appreciated by the user.
`
`11.
`
`I explained to Ms. De Bellis that by using the system and methods described
`
`above, we would have much better visibility into the data for a given patient. In
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 4 of 23
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`
`
`essence, she, as Office Manager, would be able to roll and tumble the data across
`
`our multiple databases, or search on the fly. Our software then would truncate
`
`search results, as necessary, so that she could view all search results on one page
`
`of the terminal, which would allow her to recognize the results.
`
`12. After unsuccessful attempts to modify off-the-shelf software products to implement
`
`my search-on-the-fly concepts, I began efforts to design such a software tool in
`
`May 1999. I initially focused development on icon manipulation, faceted search,
`
`truncation, and related database tools.
`
`13.
`
`I continued working on developing a system that embodied my search-on-the-fly
`
`concepts throughout the summer of 1999. Late May through September was the
`
`busiest time of the year for my medical practice due to the large influx of people
`
`into the Hamptons in the summer months. I nevertheless continued to work on
`
`developing the search-on-the-fly system when I was not in surgery or seeing
`
`patients. I found the progress to be slow and frustrating, in part because I had no
`
`training or background as a software programmer or engineer.
`
`14.
`
`In August 1999, I first discussed by inventive concepts with Adriano Freire, whom
`
`I had originally employed for other purposes, but who was a computer programmer
`
`in his native country of Brazil. Mr. Freire subsequently became a co-inventor on
`
`my U.S. Patent 7,188,100.
`
`15. My initial efforts with Mr. Freire were directed to writing software programs that
`
`would bring my inventive concepts to life. Those efforts included Mr. Freire writing
`
`computer code that would accomplish my intentions. To that end, I purchased
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 5 of 23
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`
`
`computer hardware and related devices to execute the code Mr. Freire was writing.
`
`Many of these purchases were made on behalf of my medical practice by my Office
`
`Manager, Missy De Bellis.
`
`16.
`
`I also was encouraged at this time to form a software company that could market
`
`the software products I was developing, should they prove to be successful. On
`
`October 14, 1999, I formed Virtual Logistix, Inc. to produce and market the
`
`software products.
`
`17. As mentioned above, to support the development of the search-on-the-fly system,
`
`I purchased computer hardware and related devices and computer software that
`
`Mr. Freire used for the software development efforts. For example, I purchased
`
`an Apple computer and related devices on September 27, 1999 and a jaz drive to
`
`back up our work on October 5, 1999. I also purchased other computer-related
`
`products and services, as can be seen in a copy of a credit card statement, which
`
`shows purchases from September 27, 1999 through December 17, 1999, and in a
`
`number of invoices for computer equipment (hardware and software) to allow
`
`software development, testing, and operation. See Figures 1 - 12 below for these
`
`purchases. Figure 4, for example, shows purchase of a Visual Basic tool for
`
`software development.
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 6 of 23
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 1.
`
`Credit Card Statement
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 7 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 2.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 09/27/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 8 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 3.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/05/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 9 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 4.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/09/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 10 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 5.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/13/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 11 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 6.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/15/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 12 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 7.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/20/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 13 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 8.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/05/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 14 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 9.
`
`Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/18/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 15 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 10. Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/29/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 16 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 11. Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/25/1999
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 17 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 12. Computer Equipment Invoice, 10/05/1999
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18.
`
`In September 1999, I concluded that the software programs could be marketable
`
`and determined that I should seek patent protection. In early October 1999, I
`
`spoke with Walter Mondale, at the time a partner at Dorsey & Whitney LLP in
`
`Minneapolis, MN, and asked his advice as to how I should go about obtaining
`
`patent protection. Mr. Mondale was about to travel to Los Angeles to be the
`
`keynote speaker at an event put on by the International Campaign for Tibet to
`
`honor the Dalai Lama and others. Since Eleanor Mondale and I also were going
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 18 of 23
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`
`
`to the same event, we decided to discuss the matter in person in Los Angeles.
`
`When we met, Mr. Mondale offered to arrange for a Dorsey & Whitney patent
`
`attorney to contact me. Below is a picture (Figure 13) of me, Eleanor Mondale, the
`
`Dalai Lama, and Walter Mondale at the October 11, 1999 event.
`
`
`
`Figure 13. Honoring the Dalai Lama with Former Vice-President Walter Mondale
`
`19. Mr. Mondale said he would have a Dorsey & Whitney LLP patent attorney contact
`
`me to discuss obtaining patent protection. I had that telephone conversation on
`
`October 28, 1999, and sent Dorsey & Whitney LLP a retainer check for $1,000 on
`
`November 1. Below are (1) a copy of the retainer check (Figure 14) and (2) a copy
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 19 of 23
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`of portions of my telephone bill (Figure 15) showing a 31-minute call to Dorsey &
`
`Whitney’s Washington, D.C. office on October 28, 1999.
`
`Figure 14. Retainer Check
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 20 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`Figure 15. AT&T Phone Bill
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 21 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`
`20.
`
`Throughout this time, I continued work on developing my search-on-the-fly
`
`systems. We eventually built a prototype of the system. Throughout the
`
`development process, I showed our progress to my Office Manager. I also
`
`demonstrated the prototypes to her as they were developed.
`
`21.
`
`I met with two patent attorneys from Dorsey & Whitney LLP in my Southampton,
`
`New York office on December 9, 1999. I specifically recall that the meeting was
`
`on a Thursday because I regularly spent Wednesday in my New York City office,
`
`but I canceled those office hours to prepare for the meeting. I recall that the
`
`meeting was on the first Thursday in December, which was December 9.
`
`22. At the December 9, 1999 meeting, I demonstrated a prototype of my search-on-
`
`the-fly system that I had developed with Mr. Freire. The prototype used a database
`
`that Mr. Freire had created consisting of phone book records. I had shown this
`
`prototype to my Office Manager, who by that point, was also employed by Virtual
`
`Logistix.
`
`23. After the December 9, 1999 meeting, Mr. Freire and I copied the system we
`
`demonstrated onto a CD. On December 28, 1999, we sent that CD to Dorsey &
`
`Whitney. A copy of the letter, which bears my signature, forwarding the CD is
`
`being concurrently submitted with my declaration as Exhibit 2026.
`
`24. Dorsey & Whitney filed my first patent application, now U.S. Patent 6,760,720, on
`
`February 25, 2000. Screenshots from the system I demonstrated during the
`
`December 1999 were incorporated into drawings in the first application from which
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 22 of 23
`
`

`

`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent No. 7,302,423
`Declaration of Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 6,760,720 issued. One such screenshot is Fig. 10, which is
`
`reproduced as Exhibit 2025 being concurrently submitted with my declaration.
`
`25. Subsequently, on August 24, 2000, Dorsey & Whitney filed Provisional Application
`
`60/227,305, and on August 24, 2001 filed Non-provisional Application 09/935,565,
`
`which claims priority to the Provisional Application and is a Continuation-in-Part of
`
`09/513,340, now U.S. Patent 6,760,720.
`
`26.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein based on my own knowledge are true
`
`and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I made all statements with the
`
`knowledge that willful false statements are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or
`
`both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date July 8, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dr. Joseph L. De Bellis
`
`Exhibit 2021 / Page 23 of 23
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket