throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 51
`Entered: November 6, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`VILOX TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent 7,302,423 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, ROBERT J. WEINSCHENK, and
`JOHN D. HAMANN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HAMANN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a)
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00044
`Patent 7,302,423 B2
`
`I.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`
`
`On November 2, 2018, a conference call was conducted among
`
`respective counsel for Unified Patents Inc. (“Petitioner”) and Vilox
`
`Technologies, LLC (“Patent Owner”), and Judges Medley, Weinschenk, and
`
`Hamann. The purpose of the call was twofold.
`
`
`
`First, Petitioner requested our authorization to file a Sur-Reply to
`
`respond to Patent Owner’s Reply (Paper 45) regarding Patent Owner’s
`
`Motion to Amend certain challenged claims (Paper 27). Petitioner submitted
`
`that such a Sur-Reply is provided for in the August 2018 Trial Practice
`
`Guide Update (https://go.usa.gov/xU7GP). Patent Owner does not oppose
`
`Petitioner’s request for a Sur-Reply.
`
`
`
`We find that the panel could benefit from Petitioner’s response to the
`
`arguments raised in Patent Owner’s Reply regarding Patent Owner’s Motion
`
`to Amend in adjudicating the issues in this proceeding. Accordingly, we
`
`grant Petitioner’s request for authorization to file a Sur-Reply to Patent
`
`Owner’s Reply.
`
`
`
`Second, Petitioner requested our authorization to file a motion to have
`
`stricken from Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply to the Petition citations to Patent
`
`Owner’s Exhibit 2027 (Oct. 22, 2018 Declaration of Wesley W. Chu, PH.D)
`
`and Exhibit 2029 (Oct. 22, 2018 Declaration of Lucille Marie De Bellis).
`
`Petitioner argued that the Sur-Reply’s citing to these exhibits was contrary to
`
`our October 2, 2018 Order (Paper 44), which authorized Patent Owner’s
`
`Sur-Reply. Patent Owner argued that to the extent that its Sur-Reply citing
`
`to Exhibits 2027 and 2029 is not proper, Patent Owner should be allowed to
`
`file an amended Sur-Reply, excising the citations to Exhibits 2027 and 2029.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00044
`Patent 7,302,423 B2
`
`
`
`We agree with Petitioner that Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply citing to
`
`Exhibits 2027 and 2029 is contrary to our October 2, 2018. The Order
`
`provides that Patent Owner’s “Sur-Reply may not be accompanied by new
`
`evidence other than deposition transcripts of the cross-examination of any
`
`reply witness.” Paper 44, 2. Thus, the portions of Patent Owner’s Sur-
`
`Reply that cite to Exhibits 2027 and 2029 are improper — these exhibits
`
`(i) were filed on October 22, 2018 along with the Sur-Reply and (ii) are not
`
`deposition transcripts. Hence, we find that Patent Owner should amend its
`
`Sur-Reply to comply with our October 2, 2018 Order.
`
`II. ORDER
`
`
`
`It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner may file a Sur-Reply to Patent
`
`Owner’s Reply regarding the pending Motion to Amend on or before
`
`November 13, 2018;
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Sur-Reply is limited to five
`
`pages;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Sur-Reply is limited to
`
`responding to the Reply;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Sur-Reply may not be
`
`accompanied by new evidence other than deposition transcripts of the cross-
`
`examination of any reply witness; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner shall file on or before
`
`November 7, 2018 an Amended Sur-Reply excising the citations to Exhibits
`
`2027 and 2029, and without otherwise changing the Sur-Reply’s substance.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00044
`Patent 7,302,423 B2
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`David M. O’Dell
`David L. McCombs
`Thomas Kelton
`John Russell Emerson
`Scott Cunning
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`david.odell.ipr@haynesboone.com
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`thomas.kelton.ipr@haynesboone.com
`russell.emerson.ipr@haynesboone.com
`scott.cunning.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`
`Jonathan Stroud
`Roshan Mansinghani
`UNIFIED PATENT INC.
`jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`John K. Harrop
`harrop@vapatent.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket