`________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________
`
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`VILOX TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`Patent Owner
`________________
`
`IPR2018-00044
`Patent 7,302,423
`
`________________
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner hereby requests oral
`
`IPR2018-00044
` Patent 7,302,423
`
`
`
`argument in the present inter partes review to be held on December 11, 2018 as set
`
`forth in the Scheduling Order. Paper 10 at 4, 6.
`
`I. Issues to be Presented During Oral Argument
`
`Petitioner requests the opportunity to present oral argument on all issues
`
`raised in the papers pertaining to the instituted grounds, including:
`
`• how the combination of Maloney and Bertram renders obvious claims 1–
`
`4, 7–9, and 13 of the ’423 Patent;
`
`• how the combination of Excel and Bertram renders obvious claims 1–4,
`
`7–9, and 13 of the ’423 Patent;
`
`• how the combination of Maloney, Bertram, and Kanevsky renders
`
`obvious claims 5 and 6;
`
`• how the combination of Excel, Bertram, and Kanevsky renders obvious
`
`claims 5 and 6;
`
`• how the proposed claims 24–27 lack written description support in the
`
`disclosure of the ’423 Patent;
`
`• how the combination of Maloney and Bertram renders obvious proposed
`
`claims 24 and 25;
`
`• how the combination of Excel and Bertram renders obvious proposed
`
`claims 24 and 25;
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`
`• how the combination of Maloney, Bertram, and Kanevsky renders
`
`IPR2018-00044
` Patent 7,302,423
`
`
`
`obvious proposed claims 26 and 27;
`
`• how the combination of Excel, Bertram, and Kanevsky renders obvious
`
`proposed claims 26 and 27;
`
`• how the combination of Maloney, Bertram, and Goldberg renders
`
`obvious proposed claims 26 and 27;
`
`• how the combination of Excel, Bertram, and Goldberg renders obvious
`
`proposed claims 26 and 27;
`
`• how Excel and Goldberg are prior art to the ’423 patent;
`
`• motions to exclude (if any); and
`
`• any responses to issues raised by the Board at the argument.
`
`Dated: November 2, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /David M. O’Dell/
`
`David M. O’Dell
`
`Registration No. 42,044
`
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`
`IPR2018-00044
` Patent 7,302,423
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6, this is to certify that a true and correct copy
`
`of the foregoing “Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument” service was made on
`
`the Patent Owner as detailed below:
`
`
`
`Date of service November 2, 2018
`
`
`Manner of service Email: harrop@vapatent.com
`
`
`Documents served Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`Persons Served John K. Harrop
`Cecil E. Key
`Jay Kesan
`P.O. Box 320171
`Alexandria, VA 22320
`
`440 Belmont Bay Drive, Unit 202
`Woodbridge, VA 22191
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /David M. O’Dell/
`
`David M. O’Dell
`
`Registration No. 42,044
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`