throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571–272–7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 65
`Entered: February 8, 2019
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`VILOX TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00044
`Patent 7,302,423 B2
`____________
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, ROBERT J. WEINSCHENK, and
`JOHN D. HAMANN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HAMANN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Denying Without Prejudice Motion for Entry of Protective Order
`37 C.F.R. § 42.54
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00044
`Patent 7,302,423 B2
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`
`Vilox Technologies LLC (“Patent Owner”) seeks entry of a modified
`
`version of the Board’s Default Protective Order. Paper 61 (“Motion”); see
`also (Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48771 (Aug.
`14, 2012)). Patent Owner represents that Unified Patents Inc. (“Petitioner”)
`has agreed to the entry of the proposed Modified Default Protective Order
`(Paper 81, Attachment A). Motion 2. Patent Owner submits a clean version
`of the proposed Modified Default Protective Order as Attachment A to the
`Motion and a redline version of the proposed Modified Default Protective
`Order as Appendix B to the Motion. Id. at Attachments A and B. For the
`reasons discussed below, the Motion is denied without prejudice.
`
`II. ANALYSIS
`
`After considering the Motion and the Attachments thereto, we
`determine that Patent Owner has not shown that the parties’ proposed
`definition for “confidential information” contained in the proposed Modified
`Default Protective Order is appropriate. This proposed definition
`provides: “Confidential Information includes information (regardless of
`how it is generated, stored, or maintained) or tangible things that would
`qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) or any
`other applicable rule of procedure, evidence, substantive law, and/or by
`agreement of the parties.” Motion, Attachment A, 2. The parties’ definition
`is overly broad, allowing any information to be deemed confidential
`information simply “by agreement of the parties.” Id. Moreover, the
`parties’ definition also is ambiguous with respect to “information . . . that
`would qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) or
`any other applicable rule of procedure, evidence, [or] substantive law.” This
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00044
`Patent 7,302,423 B2
`
`language does not specify clearly the types of information that could qualify
`for the protections afforded by a protective order. In contrast, the Board’s
`rules clearly define “[c]onfidential information [as] mean[ing] trade secret or
`other confidential research, development, or commercial information.” 37
`C.F.R. § 42.2. These deficiencies negatively impact the Board’s strong
`interest in the public availability of trial proceedings. See Garmin Int’l v.
`Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC, Case IPR2012-00001, slip op. at 1–2, (PTAB
`March 14, 2013) (Paper 34).
`
`Based on the above reasoning, the Motion is denied without prejudice.
`Patent Owner is provided leave to file a renewed motion for protective order
`within ten days of entry of this Order to correct the above noted deficiencies.
`The confidential version of the January 9, 2019 conference call (Paper 59)
`shall remain sealed for that time period, to provide Patent Owner the
`opportunity to file the motion.
`
`III. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that the Motion is denied without prejudice; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner may file a renewed motion for
`entry of a protective order within ten days of entry of this Order.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00044
`Patent 7,302,423 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`David M. O’Dell
`David L. McCombs
`Thomas Kelton
`John Russell Emerson
`Scott Cunning
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`david.odell.ipr@haynesboone.com
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`thomas.kelton.ipr@haynesboone.com
`russell.emerson.ipr@haynesboone.com
`scott.cunning.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`Jonathan Stroud
`Roshan Mansinghani
`UNIFIED PATENT INC.
`jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`John K. Harrop
`DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC
`harrop@vapatent.com
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket