throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 44
`Entered: May 16, 2019
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FALL LINE PATENTS, LLC
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00043
`Patent 9,454,748 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before MICHELLE N. WORMMEESTER, SHEILA F. McSHANE, and
`JOHN R. KENNY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KENNY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Motion to Expunge, Preservation of Record in the Event of an Appeal
`37 C.F.R. § 42.56
`
`Petitioner filed a motion (Paper 40) seeking to expunge Papers 30 and
`
`31 and Exhibit 2009. Paper 40, 1. Patent Owner opposed this motion.
`Paper 41.
`
`In another order being issued concurrently, we grant the pending
`motions to seal (Papers 29 and 32) with respect to Papers 30 and 31 and
`Exhibit 2009. Therefore, Papers 30 and 31 and Exhibit 2009 shall remain
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00043
`Patent 9,454,748 B2
`
`sealed until (i) forty-five days after the termination of an appeal or (ii) forty-
`five days after the period for filing a notice of appeal has expired if no notice
`of appeal is filed. See Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg.
`48756, 48761; Hyperbranch Med. Techn., Inc., v. Incept LLC, IPR2016-
`10836, Paper 68, 2. We deny Petitioner’s motion to expunge (Paper 40)
`because the time period for filing a notice to appeal has not expired, and the
`record for this proceeding should be fully preserved in the event of an
`appeal.
`Petitioner may file another motion to expunge within twenty days
`after (i) the time period for filing a notice of appeal has expired if no notice
`of appeal is filed or (ii) the termination of an appeal from this proceeding if a
`notice of appeal is filed. Such motion to expunge and any opposition to it
`should address the merits of expunging Papers 30 and 31 and Exhibit 2009
`in light of the appellate record (if any) as well as the current record.
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Expunge (Paper 40) is
`DENIED;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Papers 30 and 31 and Exhibit 2009 shall
`not be expunged, and shall remain sealed until (i) forty-five days after the
`termination of an appeal from this proceeding or (ii) forty-five days after the
`period for filing a notice of appeal has expired if no notice of appeal is filed;
`and
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00043
`Patent 9,454,748 B2
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner may file another motion to
`expunge within twenty days after (i) the time period for filing a notice of
`appeal has expired if no notice of appeal is filed or (ii) the termination of any
`appeal in this proceeding if a notice of appeal is filed.
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`David W. O’Brien
`Raghav Bajaj
`Roshan Mansinghani
`David L. McCombs
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`david.obrien.ipr@haynesboone.com
`raghav.bajaj.ipr@haynesboone.com
`roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`Jonathan Stroud
`Jonathan Bowser
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`jbowser@unifiedpatents.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Terry L. Watt
`CROWE & DUNLEVY
`terry.watt@crowedunlevy.com
`
`Matthew J. Antonelli
`Michael E. Ellis
`Larry D. Thompson, Jr.
`Zachariah Harrington
`ANTONELLI, HARRINGTON & THOMPSON LLP
`matt@ahtlawfirm.com
`michael@ahtlawfirm.com
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00043
`Patent 9,454,748 B2
`
`larry@ahlawfirm.com
`zac@ahtlawfirm.com
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket