`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 35
`Entered: April 4, 2019
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FALL LINE PATENTS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00043
`Patent 9,454,748 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before MICHELLE N. WORMMEESTER, SHEILA F. McSHANE, and
`JOHN R. KENNY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KENNY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Public Access to the Final Written Decision
`Filed concurrently with this Order is the Board’s Final Written
`Decision for this inter partes review. Currently, the Final Written Decision
`is only accessible to the parties and the Board because the decision cites to a
`paper that the parties have moved to seal. We do not discern that any
`confidential information is disclosed in the Final Written Decision;
`nonetheless, we have restricted access to this decision at this time in an
`abundance of caution. If a party believes, however, that any portion of the
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00043
`Patent 9,454,748 B2
`
`Final Written Decision should not subsequently be made publicly accessible,
`the party may, within fourteen days of the issuance of this order, move to
`redact portions of the Final Written Decision that it believes should be
`sealed. The motion must be accompanied by a proposed, redacted version of
`the Final Written Decision and must explain the confidential nature of each
`proposed redaction. The motion must also indicate whether the opposing
`party opposes any proposed redaction. If no such motion is filed within
`fourteen days of the entry of this Order, the entire Final Written Decision
`will made publicly accessible.
`
`Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
`A party may, within fourteen days of the issuance of this Order, move
`to redact the portions of the Final Written Decision that it seeks to seal.
`Such a motion must be accompanied by a proposed, redacted version of the
`Final Written Decision and must explain the confidential nature of each
`proposed redaction. The motion must also indicate whether the opposing
`party opposes any proposed redaction.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00043
`Patent 9,454,748 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`David W. O’Brien
`Raghav Bajaj
`Roshan Mansinghani
`David L. McCombs
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`david.obrien.ipr@haynesboone.com
`raghav.bajaj.ipr@haynesboone.com
`roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`Jonathan Stroud
`Jonathan Bowser
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`jbowser@unifiedpatents.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Terry L. Watt
`CROWE & DUNLEVY
`terry.watt@crowedunlevy.com
`
`Matthew J. Antonelli
`Michael E. Ellis
`Larry D. Thompson, Jr.
`Zachariah Harrington
`ANTONELLI, HARRINGTON & THOMPSON LLP
`matt@ahtlawfirm.com
`michael@ahtlawfirm.com
`zac@ahtlawfirm.com
`larry@ahlawfirm.com
`
`
`3
`
`