throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 35
`Entered: April 4, 2019
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FALL LINE PATENTS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00043
`Patent 9,454,748 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before MICHELLE N. WORMMEESTER, SHEILA F. McSHANE, and
`JOHN R. KENNY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KENNY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Public Access to the Final Written Decision
`Filed concurrently with this Order is the Board’s Final Written
`Decision for this inter partes review. Currently, the Final Written Decision
`is only accessible to the parties and the Board because the decision cites to a
`paper that the parties have moved to seal. We do not discern that any
`confidential information is disclosed in the Final Written Decision;
`nonetheless, we have restricted access to this decision at this time in an
`abundance of caution. If a party believes, however, that any portion of the
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00043
`Patent 9,454,748 B2
`
`Final Written Decision should not subsequently be made publicly accessible,
`the party may, within fourteen days of the issuance of this order, move to
`redact portions of the Final Written Decision that it believes should be
`sealed. The motion must be accompanied by a proposed, redacted version of
`the Final Written Decision and must explain the confidential nature of each
`proposed redaction. The motion must also indicate whether the opposing
`party opposes any proposed redaction. If no such motion is filed within
`fourteen days of the entry of this Order, the entire Final Written Decision
`will made publicly accessible.
`
`Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
`A party may, within fourteen days of the issuance of this Order, move
`to redact the portions of the Final Written Decision that it seeks to seal.
`Such a motion must be accompanied by a proposed, redacted version of the
`Final Written Decision and must explain the confidential nature of each
`proposed redaction. The motion must also indicate whether the opposing
`party opposes any proposed redaction.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00043
`Patent 9,454,748 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`David W. O’Brien
`Raghav Bajaj
`Roshan Mansinghani
`David L. McCombs
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`david.obrien.ipr@haynesboone.com
`raghav.bajaj.ipr@haynesboone.com
`roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`Jonathan Stroud
`Jonathan Bowser
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`jbowser@unifiedpatents.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Terry L. Watt
`CROWE & DUNLEVY
`terry.watt@crowedunlevy.com
`
`Matthew J. Antonelli
`Michael E. Ellis
`Larry D. Thompson, Jr.
`Zachariah Harrington
`ANTONELLI, HARRINGTON & THOMPSON LLP
`matt@ahtlawfirm.com
`michael@ahtlawfirm.com
`zac@ahtlawfirm.com
`larry@ahlawfirm.com
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket