`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`———————
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`———————
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`- vs. -
`
`FALL LINE PATENTS, LLC
`
`Patent Owner
`———————
`
`IPR2018-00043
`
`U.S. Patent 9,454,748
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Motion to Seal
`IPR2018-00043 (U.S. Patent 9,454,748)
`
`I.
`
`Introduction.
`
`Petitioner
`
`requests
`
`that Petitioner’s Response
`
`to Patent Owner’s
`
`Observations, and Exhibit 1028, filed herewith, be sealed under 37 C.F.R. § 42.54
`
`and the Parties’ Agreed-Upon Default Protective Order (previously filed). Good
`
`cause to seal these documents exists because they contain sensitive, non-public
`
`information.
`
`II. Good Cause Exists for Sealing Certain Confidential Information.
`
`The Office Patent Trial Practice Guide provides that “the rules aim to strike
`
`a balance between
`
`the public’s
`
`interest
`
`in maintaining a complete and
`
`understandable file history and the parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive
`
`information.” 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012). Further, those rules
`
`“identify confidential information in a manner consistent with Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), which provides for protective orders for trade secret
`
`or other confidential research, development, or commercial information.” Id.
`
`(citing 37 C.F.R. § 42.54).
`
`Petitioner’s Response to Patent Owner’s Observations and Exhibit 1028
`
`contain information that Petitioner has identified as confidential business
`
`information.
`
`Petitioner’s Response to Patent Owner’s Observations references and
`
`describes the content of the deposition of Kevin Jakel (transcript previously filed
`
`2
`
`
`
`Motion to Seal
`IPR2018-00043 (U.S. Patent 9,454,748)
`as Exhibit 2009), Petitioner’s CEO, in which sensitive business information that
`
`has not been published or otherwise made public was discussed. A Motion to Seal
`
`was previously filed for Exhibit 2009 by Patent Owner.
`
`Exhibit 1028 is an errata sheet for the transcript of Mr. Jakel’s deposition,
`
`which was filed as Exhibit 2009, designated as confidential, and likewise contains
`
`sensitive business information that has not been published or otherwise made
`
`public.
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`For the above reasons, Petitioner requests that Petitioner’s Response to
`
`Patent Owner’s Observations and Exhibit 1028 be placed under seal.
`
`March 1, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/David W. OBrien/
`David W. O’Brien
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Registration No. 40,107
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`
`3
`
`