throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`DYNACRAFT BSC, INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`MATTEL, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2018-0003 8
`
`Patent 7,222,684
`
`DECLARATION OF JEFF REYNOLDS
`
`1
`1
`
`-
`
`Mattel Ex. 2001
`Mattel Ex. 2001
`Dynacraft v. Mattel
`Dynacraft v. Mattel
`IPR2018-00038
`|PR2018-00038
`
`

`

`1, Jeff Reynolds, declare to the best of my recollection as follows;
`
`1.
`
`I worked at Fisher-Price in East Aurora, New York, from 1977 to 2015.
`
`I retired
`
`in 2015 and am currently retired.
`
`I was continuously employed at Fisher-Price for that entire
`
`period, except for 1985 to 1988, during which time I was at Hasbro.
`
`2.
`
`From approximately 1995 to 2010, I was assigned to Fisher-Price’s Power Wheels
`
`electromechanical group in the development of children’s battery powered ride-ons.
`
`3.
`
`I graduated from Worcester Polytechnic Institute in 1977 with a Bachelor of
`
`Science degree in Mechanical Engineering.
`
`4.
`
`As over twenty years have passed since many of these events have transpired, the
`
`following reflects my best recollection regarding the events surrounding Power Wheels’
`
`development of a soft-start system:
`
`I started with the Power Wheels group as a manager for the
`
`electromechanical group in 1995. From my earliest times with the group, I recall being made
`
`aware of consumer complaints regarding the jerky on/off nature of Power Wheels vehicles.
`
`These vehicles had issues with electrical “in rush,” as well as mechanical failures, due to the
`
`abrupt on/off nature of the electromechanical systems employed in these vehicles. Addressing
`
`these concerns was challenging in large part due to the cost constraints that these vehicles were
`
`manufactured under. To solve this, additional features were explored and needed to be
`developed in a way that did not add unacceptable levels of complexity and cost to the
`
`manufacturer and consumer.
`
`5.
`
`Power Wheels as a group grappled with ways of dealing with these issues in a
`
`safe, and cost effective manner from my earliest time with the team.
`
`I recall different attempts to
`
`do so that were not successful, including efforts by my team to purchase motor controllers and
`
`incorporate them into prototype ride-ons.
`
`2
`
`

`

`6.
`
`At some point in those days, likely in the late 19903 or very early 2000s, I recall
`
`speaking with with Tony Norman from Innovation First to discuss speed control as a possible
`
`solution to these problems. Following on these conversations, Innovation First ended up
`
`designing speed control circuits for Power Wheels within Power Wheels’ acceptable safety and
`
`performance parameters. To my recollection, this was the first acceptable electronic speed
`
`control system utilized in a Power Wheels vehicle that effectively slowed the time over which
`
`the motors reached full speed.
`
`The forgoing is true and correct to the best of my recollection.
`
`Vii-201$
`Date
`
`ff eynolds
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket