IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`Case No.: 15-1125-GMS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC.,
`ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL,
`
`Defendants.
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-
`Defendants/Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs in Intervention
`
`v.
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`
`Intervenor-
`Plaintiff/Counterclaim
`Defendant in
`Intervention
`
`AND
`
`Microsoft Ex. 1026
`Microsoft v. Philips - IPR2018-00026
`Page 1 of 10
`
`

`

`Case No.: 15-1127-GMS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`MICROSOFT MOBILE OY
`
`Counterclaim Defendant
`in Intervention
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`VISUAL LAND, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-
`Defendants/Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs in Intervention
`
`v.
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`
`Intervenor-
`
`2
`
`Microsoft Ex. 1026
`Microsoft v. Philips - IPR2018-00026
`Page 2 of 10
`
`

`

`Case No.: 15-1130-GMS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Plaintiff/Counterclaim
`Defendant in
`Intervention
`
`AND
`
`MICROSOFT MOBILE OY
`
`Counterclaim Defendant
`in Intervention
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`DOUBLE POWER TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`ZOWEE MARKETING CO., LTD.,
`SHENZEN ZOWEE TECHNOLOGY CO.,
`LTD.
`
`Defendants.
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-
`
`3
`
`Microsoft Ex. 1026
`Microsoft v. Philips - IPR2018-00026
`Page 3 of 10
`
`

`

`Defendants/Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs in Intervention
`
`v.
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`
`Intervenor-
`Plaintiff/Counterclaim
`Defendant in
`Intervention
`
`AND
`
`MICROSOFT MOBILE OY
`
`Counterclaim Defendant
`in Intervention
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`YIFANG USA, INC. D/B/A E-FUN, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`4
`
`Case No.: 15-1131-GMS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Microsoft Ex. 1026
`Microsoft v. Philips - IPR2018-00026
`Page 4 of 10
`
`

`

`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-
`Defendants/Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs in Intervention
`
`v.
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`
`Intervenor-
`Plaintiff/Counterclaim
`Defendant in
`Intervention
`
`AND
`
`MICROSOFT MOBILE OY
`
`Counterclaim Defendant
`in Intervention
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`ACER INC.,
`ACER AMERICA CORPORATION,
`
`Defendants.
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-Plaintiff,
`
`5
`
`Case No.: 15-1170-GMS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Microsoft Ex. 1026
`Microsoft v. Philips - IPR2018-00026
`Page 5 of 10
`
`

`

`v.
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-Defendants.
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,
`
`Intervenor-
`Defendants/Counterclaim
`Plaintiffs in Intervention
`
`v.
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`
`Intervenor-
`Plaintiff/Counterclaim
`Defendant in
`Intervention
`
`AND
`
`MICROSOFT MOBILE OY
`
`Counterclaim Defendant
`in Intervention
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ INITIAL INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`AGAINST THE MICROSOFT COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS
`
`Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Proposed Scheduling Order (see, e.g., Case No.: 15-1170-
`
`GMS, D.I. 49) (so ordered September 15, 2016) and the Delaware Default Standard for
`
`Discovery, Including Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”), Paragraph 4(c),
`
`Counterclaim Plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips N.V. and U.S. Philips Corporation (collectively,
`
`“Philips”) hereby provide their
`
`Initial
`
`Infringement Contentions against Counterclaim
`
`Defendants Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Mobile Oy (collectively, “Counterclaim
`
`6
`
`Microsoft Ex. 1026
`Microsoft v. Philips - IPR2018-00026
`Page 6 of 10
`
`

`

`Initial Infringement Contentions: U.S. Patent No. 6,690,387
`
`Claim 11
`[11] The improved method of controlling the scroll-like
`display of data on an electronic display screen in
`accordance with claim 9, wherein said method comprises
`the further step of sensing a finger touch on said screen
`having a duration greater than said first given preset
`minimum time and less than a second given preset
`minimum time which is greater than said first given time
`and then moving said display in correspondence with
`movement of the finger touch
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,690,387
`
`Contention
`includes functionality for: sensing the
`Each ’387 Accused Product
`length of time that a finger is substantially stationary while in contact
`with the touchscreen, sensing the speed and direction of motion of a
`finger that is non-stationary while in contact with the touchscreen, and
`initiating and terminating a scrolling motion of scrollable data. When a
`substantially stationary finger touch contact is sensed having a duration
`longer than a first given preset minimum time (e.g., a scan rate of the
`touch screen), but shorter than the time for a long press, and the finger
`then moves while remaining in contact with the screen,
`the ’387
`Accused Product enters a “scroll mode” in which the display is moved
`in correspondence with movement of the finger. See, e.g., Ex. A at A3,
`See also Contention 9a-9h.
`See also
`A5, A6, A7, and A12.
`PHILIPS00000818.
`
`The ’387 Accused Products relating to smartphones control the scroll-
`like display of data in a list/collection of icons in the Home/Start screen.
`The ’387 Accused Products relating to desktops,
`laptops,
`tablet
`computers, studios, and hubs control the scroll-like display of data in a
`list/collection of icons in a folder of File Explorer/Windows Explorer.
`
`Presence of this claim element in the ’387 Accused Products is further
`illustrated by video taken of the Surface Pro 4, which runs Microsoft
`Windows 10 Pro, in which a finger, that is substantially stationary while
`in contact with the screen for a duration greater than the minimum time,
`but less than the time required to execute a long press, and then moves
`while remaining in contact with the screen, causes the display to move
`See, e.g.,
`in correspondence with the movement of
`the finger.
`PHILIPS00007726
`(demonstrating
`this
`claim element
`for
`a
`list/collection of icons in a folder).
`
`Presence of this claim element in the ’387 Accused Products is further
`
`9
`
`Microsoft Ex. 1026
`Microsoft v. Philips - IPR2018-00026
`Page 7 of 10
`
`

`

`Initial Infringement Contentions: U.S. Patent No. 7,184,064
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,184,064
`
`Claim 1
`[1a] An improved touch-screen image scrolling system,
`comprising:
`
`an electronic image display screen;
`
`a microprocessor coupled to said display screen to
`display information thereon and to receive interactive
`signals therefrom;
`
`timer means associated with said microprocessor to
`provide timing capacity therefor;
`
`Contention
`The ’064 Accused Products are devices that run the Microsoft Windows
`Operating System (“the ’064 Accused Devices”) by having been
`preloaded, or provided a software update, by Microsoft with one of
`Microsoft Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 10,
`Windows RT 8.0, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Phone 8.1, or Windows
`10 Mobile (“the ’064 Accused Operating Systems”) as shown in
`Appendix L to Plaintiffs’ Initial Infringement Contentions Against the
`Microsoft Counterclaim Defendants (“Appendix L”).
`
`As shown in Appendix L, each ’064 Accused Device includes a touch
`screen and a microprocessor.
`The microprocessor
`is necessarily
`coupled to the touch screen to display information on the screen and to
`receive interactive signals, such as touch contact signals, from the
`screen. The microprocessor also necessarily has a timer, such as an
`oscillator or other timing signal, associated with it to provide timing to
`the microprocessor. Sections of PHILIPS00000045 (Touch: Swipe,
`Tap, and Beyond), PHILIPS00000527 (My Windows 10), and
`PHILIPS00000048 (My Windows 8) are included as Exhibit A of this
`Appendix (“Ex. A”). Based on this exhibit, PHILIPS00000818 (video
`of the ASUS Eee PC T101MT-EU17-BK, a device running Microsoft
`Windows version 7), and PHILIPS00007378 (Building Windows for the
`ARM processor architecture) each of
`the ’064 Accused Devices
`includes functionality that allows for controlling the scroll-like display
`of data on the touchscreen as explained further below.
`
`The ’064 Accused Devices relating to smartphones control the scroll-
`like display of data in a list/collection of icons in the Home/Start screen.
`The ’064 Accused Devices relating to desktops,
`laptops,
`tablet
`computers, studios, and hubs control the scroll-like display of data in a
`list/collection of icons in a folder of File Explorer/Windows Explorer.
`
`1
`
`Microsoft Ex. 1026
`Microsoft v. Philips - IPR2018-00026
`Page 8 of 10
`
`

`

`Initial Infringement Contentions: U.S. Patent No. 7,184,064
`
`Each ’064 Accused Device includes functionality for sensing the speed
`and direction of motion of a finger that is non-stationary while in
`contact with the touchscreen. As explained further below, the sensed
`speed and direction of motion is used in initiating a scrolling motion of
`the scrollable data. See, e.g., Ex. A at A3, A5, A6, A7, and A12; see
`also infra at Contention 1c.
`
`[1c] scrolling motion program instructions associated
`with said microprocessor responsive to said duration of
`said finger touch contact such that, when said duration
`exceeds a first given preset minimum time and is
`accompanied by motion along the surface of said screen
`
`Each ’064 Accused Device includes instructions, associated with the
`microprocessor, that are responsive to the duration of a stationary finger
`contact with the touch screen such that when a finger touches the screen
`for more than a first given preset minimum (e.g., a scan rate of the touch
`screen), moves across the screen, and then separates from the screen,
`
`5
`
`Microsoft Ex. 1026
`Microsoft v. Philips - IPR2018-00026
`Page 9 of 10
`
`

`

`Initial Infringement Contentions: U.S. Patent No. 7,184,064
`
`followed by separation of said finger touch from said
`screen, a scroll format display on said screen is caused to
`begin to scroll in said sensed direction and at said sensed
`initial speed;
`
`the ’064 Accused Device enters a “fling mode,” and begins to scroll the
`scroll format data along the screen in the sensed direction and at the
`sensed initial speed (hereinafter referred to as a “fling”). See, e.g., Ex.
`A at A3, A5, A6, A7, and A12.
`
`Presence of this claim element in the ’064 Accused Devices is further
`illustrated by video taken of the Surface Pro 4, which runs Microsoft
`Windows 10 Pro, in which a fling is begun on scroll format data after a
`moving finger separates from the screen. See, e.g., PHILIPS00007726
`(demonstrating this claim element for a list/collection of icons in a
`folder).
`
`Presence of this claim element in the ’064 Accused Devices is further
`illustrated by video taken of the Lumia 735, which runs Microsoft
`Windows Phone 8.1, in which a fling is begun on scroll format data
`See, e.g.,
`after a moving finger
`separates
`from the screen.
`PHILIPS00007738
`(demonstrating
`this
`claim element
`for
`a
`list/collection of icons in the Home/Start screen).
`
`Presence of this claim element in the ’064 Accused Devices is further
`illustrated by video taken of the Lumia 650, which runs Microsoft
`Windows 10 Mobile, in which a fling is begun on scroll format data
`See, e.g.,
`after a moving finger
`separates
`from the screen.
`PHILIPS00007733
`(demonstrating
`this
`claim element
`for
`a
`list/collection of icons in the Home/Start screen).
`
`Each ’064 Accused Device includes instructions associated with the
`microprocessor for reducing the rate of scrolling displacement after a
`moving finger separates from the screen. The instructions are such that
`the fling’s rate of scrolling displacement is reduced at a given rate until
`the motion is terminated. See, e.g., Ex. A at A3, A5, A6, A7, and A12.
`
`Presence of this claim element in the ’064 Accused Devices is further
`
`6
`
`[1d] time decay program instructions associated with
`said microprocessor for reducing the rate of scrolling
`displacement on said display screen at a given rate until
`motion is terminated;
`
`Microsoft Ex. 1026
`Microsoft v. Philips - IPR2018-00026
`Page 10 of 10
`
`