throbber
IPR2017-02202
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A.,
`Patent Owner
`
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2017-02202
`Patent No. 8,239,852
`____________________
`
`DECLARATION OF LUANN L. SIMMONS IN SUPPORT OF
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION PURSUANT
`TO 37 C.F.R. §42.10(C)
`
`
`
`APPLE 1113
`
`

`

`IPR2017-02202
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`I, Luann L. Simmons, declare as follows:
`
`I am a Partner with the law firm of O’Melveny & Myers LLP. I represent
`
`and advise Petitioner Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in connection with the above-captioned
`
`inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding on the patent at issue in this IPR, U.S.
`
`Patent No. 8,239,852 (“the ’852 Patent”).
`
`2.
`
`I have been a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of California
`
`since 1999. My California State Bar number is 203526. I am also admitted to
`
`practice before numerous state and federal courts, including:
`
`a. US Supreme Court (admitted March 2003);
`
`b. US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit (admitted April 2003);
`
`c. US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (admitted January 2000);
`
`d. US District Court, California Central (admitted March 2003);
`
`e. US District Court, California Eastern (admitted June 2000);
`
`f. US District Court, California Northern (admitted December 1999);
`
`g. US District Court, California Southern (admitted September 2010); and
`
`h. US District Court, Wisconsin Western (admitted December 2007).
`
`3.
`
`I have over 18 years of experience practicing patent and technology related
`
`litigation. I have litigated numerous patent cases across the country, including in
`
`California, Delaware, Oregon, Wisconsin, and Texas, and litigated many of them
`
`through both trial and appeal.
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1113
`
`

`

`IPR2017-02202
`
`
`4.
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. I have
`
`supervised and been actively involved in the present IPR proceeding regarding the
`
`’852 Patent. I have reviewed the patent and the prior art being asserted in this IPR
`
`proceeding.
`
`5. Moreover, I have advised Petitioner on strategy regarding Petitioner’s
`
`affirmative arguments in this IPR proceeding, supervised the drafting of the
`
`petition, reviewed the accompanying Declaration of Mr. Geier, and worked with
`
`Petitioner to find and identify the references relied upon in the petition and to draft
`
`other submissions to the Office.
`
`6.
`
`I have represented clients in connection with many patent litigations
`
`regarding technology similar to that at issue in this IPR.
`
`7.
`
`Specifically, I have been lead counsel for Petitioner in district court
`
`litigations involving technology similar to that at issue in this IPR, which relates
`
`generally to software security systems, such as OpenTV, Inc. and Nagravision, SA
`
`v. Apple Inc., Case No. 3:14-cv-01622-HSG (N.D. Cal.). I have also been counsel
`
`pro hac vice for Petitioner in Board proceedings involving similar technologies.
`
`8.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body. I have never had an application for admission to practice
`
`before any court or administrative body denied. No sanction or contempt citation
`
`has been imposed against me by any court or administrative body.
`
`2
`
`APPLE 1113
`
`

`

`IPR2017-02202
`
`
`9.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`10.
`
`I agree to and will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct
`
`set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37
`
`C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`11.
`
`I have applied to, and was admitted to, appear pro hac vice before the Board
`
`in the following proceedings in the last three years:
`
`• IPR2015-00971;
`
`• IPR2015-00980;
`
`• IPR2015-00969;
`
`• IPR2015-01031.
`
`12.
`
`I have pending motions for pro hac vice admission in IPR proceeding Nos.
`
`2017-01914, 2017-01993, and 2017-02041, which involve patents asserted by the
`
`Patent Owner of the ’852 Patent in the same co-pending district court litigation
`
`(Uniloc USA, Inc. et al. v. Apple Inc., No. 2:17-cv-258-JRG (E.D. Texas)).
`
`13.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
`
`I further declare that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful
`
`false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or
`
`both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code and that such
`
`3
`
`APPLE 1113
`
`

`

`willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any
`
`IPR2017-02202
`
`
`patents issued thereon.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: November 7, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Luann L. Simmons
`Luann L. Simmons
`O’Melveny & Myers LLP
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`APPLE 1113
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket