`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 21
`Entered: November 13, 2018
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`PUZHEN LIFE USA, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`ESIP SERIES 2, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2017-02197
`Patent 9,415,130 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY, JON B. TORNQUIST, and
`CHRISTOPHER M. KAISER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`KAISER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02197
`Patent 9,415,130 B2
`ESIP Series 2, LLC (“Patent Owner”) requests oral hearing pursuant
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70. Paper 18. Subject to the discussion in the present
`order, we grant the request for oral hearing.
`Oral argument shall commence at 1:00 pm Eastern Time on December
`4, 2018, on the 9th floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street,
`Alexandria, Virginia. Petitioner and Patent Owner each shall have 60
`minutes of total time to present arguments. The hearing will proceed as
`follows. Petitioner will open the hearing by presenting its case. Patent
`Owner then will respond to Petitioner’s presentation. Petitioner may reserve
`rebuttal time (of no more than half its total argument time) to reply to Patent
`Owner’s arguments. Patent Owner may reserve sur-rebuttal time to respond
`briefly to Petitioner’s rebuttal.
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing, and the
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. The
`hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance that will be
`accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis.
`The parties shall serve on opposing counsel demonstrative exhibits no
`later than November 22, 2018. The parties also shall provide the
`demonstrative exhibits to the Board at least three business days prior to the
`hearing by emailing them to Trials@uspto.gov. The parties shall not file
`any demonstrative exhibits in this proceeding without prior authorization
`from the Board. A hard copy of the demonstrative exhibits should be
`provided to the court reporter at the hearing.
`We remind the parties that demonstrative exhibits are not evidence,
`but are intended to assist the parties in presenting their oral arguments to the
`Board. We also remind the parties that demonstrative exhibits are not a
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02197
`Patent 9,415,130 B2
`mechanism for making arguments not previously addressed in the papers.
`The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The
`Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, Case IPR2013-00041
`(PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate
`content of demonstrative exhibits, which must include citations to the
`record.
`To the extent that the parties object to the propriety of any
`demonstrative exhibits, we expect the parties will meet and confer in good
`faith to resolve any objections to demonstrative exhibits. If such objections
`cannot be resolved, the parties may file objections to demonstratives with
`the Board at least two business days before the hearing. The objections
`should identify with particularity the portions of each demonstrative exhibit
`subject to objection, include a copy of the objected-to portions, and include a
`one-sentence statement of the reason for each objection. No further
`argument or explanation is permitted. We will consider any objections and
`schedule a conference call if deemed necessary. Otherwise, we will reserve
`ruling on the objections. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not
`timely presented will be considered waived.
`At least one member of the panel will be attending the hearing
`electronically from a remote location and may not be able to view the
`projection screen in the hearing room. In particular, documents presented on
`the Elmo projector are not visible to remote judges, so please plan
`accordingly. If a demonstrative exhibit is not made available or visible to
`the judge(s) presiding over the hearing remotely, that demonstrative will not
`be considered. Each presenter must identify clearly and specifically each
`demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced during the
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02197
`Patent 9,415,130 B2
`hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript and for
`the benefit of the judge(s) presiding over the hearing remotely. Because of
`limitations of the audio transmission systems in our hearing rooms, the
`presenter may speak only when standing at the hearing room lectern.
`No live witness testimony shall be taken at the oral argument. The
`Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person at the oral
`hearing. However, any counsel of record may present the party’s argument.
`If either party expects that its lead counsel will not be attending the oral
`argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference with the
`Board no later than two business days prior to the oral hearing to discuss the
`matter.
`Any requests for audiovisual equipment should be directed to
`Trials@uspto.gov. Requests for equipment will not be honored unless
`presented in a separate communication not less than three business days
`before the hearing, directed to the above email address.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02197
`Patent 9,415,130 B2
`It is
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s request for oral hearing is granted
`subject to the conditions set forth in this Order; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that an oral hearing, conducted pursuant to
`the procedures outlined above, shall commence at 1:00 PM Eastern Time on
`December 4, 2018.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02197
`Patent 9,415,130 B2
`PETITIONER:
`
`Mark A. Miller
`Bradley B. Jensen
`DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
`miller.mark@dorsey.com
`jensen.bradley@dorsey.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Gordon K. Hill
`PATE BAIRD, PLLC
`ghill@patebaird.com
`
`
`6
`
`