throbber
IL-6 in Inflammation, Immunity, and Disease
`
`Toshio Tanaka1,2, Masashi Narazaki3, and Tadamitsu Kishimoto4
`
`1Department of Clinical Application of Biologics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka
`University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
`2Department of Immunopathology, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka
`University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
`3Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Rheumatic Diseases, Osaka University Graduate School
`of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
`4Laboratory of Immune Regulation, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka
`University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
`
`Correspondence: kishimoto@ifrec.osaka-u.ac.jp
`
`Interleukin 6 (IL-6), promptly and transiently produced in response to infections and tissue
`injuries, contributes to host defense through the stimulation of acute phase responses, he-
`matopoiesis, and immune reactions. Although its expression is strictly controlled by tran-
`scriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms, dysregulated continual synthesis of IL-6
`plays a pathological effect on chronic inflammation and autoimmunity. For this reason,
`tocilizumab, a humanized anti-IL-6 receptor antibody was developed. Various clinical
`trials have since shown the exceptional efficacy of tocilizumab, which resulted in its approval
`for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Moreover, tocili-
`zumab is expected to be effective for other intractable immune-mediated diseases. In this
`context, the mechanism for the continual synthesis of IL-6 needs to be elucidated to facilitate
`the development of more specific therapeutic approaches and analysis of the pathogenesis of
`specific diseases.
`
`IL-6 is a soluble mediator with a pleiotropic
`
`effect on inflammation, immune response,
`and hematopoiesis. At first, distinct functions
`of IL-6 were studied and given distinct names
`based on their biological activity. For example,
`the name B-cell stimulatory factor 2 (BSF-2)
`was based on the ability to induce differentia-
`tion of activated B cells into antibody (Ab)-pro-
`ducing cells (Kishimoto 1985), the name hepa-
`tocyte-stimulating factor (HSF) on the effect of
`acute phase protein synthesis on hepatocytes,
`
`the name hybridoma growth factor (HGF) on
`the enhancement of growth of fusion cells be-
`tween plasma cells and myeloma cells, or the
`name interferon (IFN)-b2 owing to its IFN an-
`tiviral activity. When the BSF-2 cDNA was suc-
`cessfully cloned in 1986 (Hirano et al. 1986),
`however, it was found that the molecules with
`different names studied by various groups were
`in fact identical, resulting in the single name IL-
`6 (Kishimoto 1989). Human IL-6 is made up of
`212 amino acids, including a 28-amino-acid
`
`Editor: Ruslan M. Medzhitov
`Additional Perspectives on Innate Immunity and Inflammation available at www.cshperspectives.org
`Copyright # 2014 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016295
`Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014;6:a016295
`
`1
`
`CUREVAC EX2036
`Page 1
`
`

`

`T. Tanaka et al.
`
`signal peptide, and its gene has been mapped to
`chromosome 7p21. Although the core protein
`is (cid:2)20 kDa, glycosylation accounts for the size
`of 21 – 26 kDa of natural IL-6.
`
`BIOLOGICAL EFFECT OF IL-6 ON
`INFLAMMATION AND IMMUNITY
`
`After IL-6 is synthesized in a local lesion in the
`initial stage of inflammation, it moves to the
`liver through the bloodstream,
`followed by
`the rapid induction of an extensive range of
`acute phase proteins such as C-reactive pro-
`tein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), fibrinogen,
`haptoglobin, and a1-antichymotrypsin (Fig. 1)
`(Heinrich et al. 1990). On the other hand, IL-6
`reduces the production of fibronectin, albu-
`min, and transferrin. These biological effects
`on hepatocytes were at first studied as belong-
`ing to HSF. When high-level concentrations of
`SAA persist for a long time, it leads to a serious
`complication of several chronic inflammatory
`
`diseases through the generation of amyloid A
`amyloidosis (Gillmore et al. 2001). This results
`in amyloid fibril deposition, which causes pro-
`gressive deterioration in various organs. IL-6 is
`also involved in the regulation of serum iron and
`zinc levels via control of their transporters. As
`for serum iron, IL-6 induces hepcidin produc-
`tion, which blocks the action of iron transporter
`ferroportin 1 on gut and, thus, reduces serum
`iron levels (Nemeth et al. 2004). This means
`that the IL-6-hepcidin axis is responsible for hy-
`poferremia and anemia associated with chronic
`inflammation. IL-6 also enhances zinc importer
`ZIP14 expression on hepatocytes and so induces
`hypozincemia seen in inflammation (Liuzzi et
`al. 2005). When IL-6 reaches the bone marrow,
`it promotes megakaryocyte maturation, thus
`leading to the release of platelets (Ishibashi et
`al. 1989). These changes in acute phase protein
`levels and red blood cell and platelet counts are
`used for the evaluation of inflammatory sever-
`ity in routine clinical laboratory examinations.
`
`IL-6
`
`Hepatocyte
`
`CRP
`Serum amyloid A
`Fibrinogen
`Albumin
`Hepcidin
`
`Bone marrow
`
`Platelet
`
`CD4 T cell
`
`Th17 differentiation
`
`inhibition
`
`CD4 T cell
`
`Treg differentiation
`
`CD8 T cell
`
`B cell
`
`Synovial
`fibroblast
`
`Dermal
`fibroblast
`
`Cytotoxic T-cell
`differentiation
`
`Antibody
`production
`RANKL
`Osteoclast
`differentiation
`VEGF
`Angiogenesis
`Vascular permeability
`
`Collagen
`
`Amyloid A amyloidosis
`Cardiovascular event
`Edema
`Anemia of inflammation
`Thrombocytosis
`
`Autoimmunity
`chronic inflammation
`
`Autoantibody
`hypergammaglobulinemia
`
`Osteoporosis
`bone fracture
`
`Joint swelling
`edema
`
`Fibrosis
`
`Figure 1. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. IL-6 is a cytokine featuring pleiotropic activity; it
`induces synthesis of acute phase proteins such as CRP, serum amyloid A, fibrinogen, and hepcidin in hepato-
`cytes, whereas it inhibits production of albumin. IL-6 also plays an important role on acquired immune response
`by stimulation of antibody production and of effector T-cell development. Moreover, IL-6 can promote differ-
`entiation or proliferation of several nonimmune cells. Because of the pleiotropic activity, dysregulated continual
`production of IL-6 leads to the onset or development of various diseases. Treg, regulatory T cell; RANKL,
`receptor activator of nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) ligand; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
`
`2
`
`Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014;6:a016295
`
`CUREVAC EX2036
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Furthermore, IL-6 promotes specific differ-

`entiation of naı¨ve CD4
`T cells, thus performing
`an important function in the linking of innate
`to acquired immune response. It has been shown
`that IL-6, in combination with transforming
`growth factor (TGF)-b, is indispensable for

`Th17 differentiation from naı¨ve CD4
`T cells
`(Korn et al. 2009), but that IL-6 also inhibits
`TGF-b-induced Treg differentiation (Bettelli
`et al. 2006). Up-regulation of the Th17/Treg
`balance is considered to be responsible for the
`disruption of immunological tolerance, and is
`thus pathologically involved in the development
`of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory dis-
`eases (Kimura and Kishimoto 2010). It has been
`further shown that IL-6 also promotes T-follic-
`ular helper-cell differentiation as well as produc-
`tion of IL-21 (Ma et al. 2012), which regulates
`immunoglobulin (Ig) synthesis and IgG4 pro-
`duction in particular. IL-6 also induces the dif-

`T cells into cytotoxic T
`ferentiation of CD8
`cells (Okada et al. 1988). Under one of its previ-
`ous names, BSF-2, IL-6 was found to be able to
`induce the differentiation of activated B cells
`into Ab-producing plasma cells, so that contin-
`uous oversynthesis of IL-6 results in hypergam-
`maglobulinemia and autoantibody production.
`IL-6 exerts various effects other than those
`on hepatocytes and lymphocytes and these are
`frequently detected in chronic inflammatory
`diseases (Kishimoto 1989; Hirano et al. 1990;
`Akira et al. 1993). One of these effects is that,
`when IL-6 is generated in bone marrow stromal
`cells, it stimulates the RANKL (Hashizume et al.
`2008), which is indispensable for the differenti-
`ation and activation of osteoclasts (Kotake et
`al. 1996), and this leads to bone resorption and
`osteoporosis (Poli et al. 1994). IL-6 also induces
`excess production of VEGF, leading to enhanced
`angiogenesis and increased vascular permeabil-
`ity, which are pathological features of inflam-
`matory lesions and are seen in, for example,
`synovial tissues of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
`or edema of remitting seronegative symmetri-
`cal synovitis with pitting edema (RS3PE) syn-
`drome (Nakahara et al. 2003; Hashizume et al.
`2009). Finally, it has been reported that IL-6
`aids keratinocyte proliferation (Grossman et al.
`1989) or the generation of collagen in dermal
`
`IL-6 in Inflammation, Immunity, and Disease
`
`fibroblasts that may account for changes in the
`skin of patients with systemic sclerosis (Duncan
`and Berman 1991).
`
`REGULATION OF IL-6 SYNTHESIS
`
`IL-6 functions as a mediator for notification of
`the occurrence of some emergent event. IL-6 is
`generated in an infectious lesion and sends out a
`warning signal to the entire body. The signature
`of exogenous pathogens, known as pathogen-
`associated molecular patterns, is recognized in
`the infected lesion by pathogen-recognition re-
`ceptors (PRRs) of immune cells such as mono-
`cytes and macrophages (Kumaret al. 2011). These
`PRRs comprise Toll-like receptors (TLRs), ret-
`inoic acid-inducible gene-1-like receptors, nu-
`cleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like
`receptors, and DNA receptors. They stimulate
`a range of signaling pathways including NF-kB,
`and enhance the transcription of the mRNA
`of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, tumor
`necrosis factor (TNF)-a, and IL-1b. TNF-a and
`IL-1b also activate transcription factors to pro-
`duce IL-6.
`IL-6 also issues a warning signal in the event
`of tissue damage. Damage-associated molecular
`patterns (DAMPs), which are released from
`damaged or dying cells in noninfectious inflam-
`mations such as burn or trauma, directly or
`indirectly promote inflammation. During ster-
`ile surgical operations, an increase in serum IL-
`6 levels precedes elevation of body temperature
`and serum acute phase protein concentration
`(Nishimoto et al. 1989). DAMPs from injured
`cells contain a variety of molecules such as mi-
`tochondrial (mt) DNA, high mobility group
`box 1 (HMGB1), and S100 proteins (Bianchi
`2007). Serum mtDNA levels in trauma patients
`are thousands of times higher than in con-
`trols and this elevation leads to TLR9 stimula-
`tion and NF-kB activation (Zhang et al. 2010),
`whereas binding of HMGB1 to TLR2, TLR4,
`and the receptor of advanced glycation end
`products (RAGE) can promote inflammation.
`The S100 family of proteins comprises more
`than 25 members, some of which also interact
`with RAGE to evoke sterile inflammation (Sims
`et al. 2010).
`
`Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014;6:a016295
`
`3
`
`CUREVAC EX2036
`Page 3
`
`

`

`T. Tanaka et al.
`
`In addition to immune-mediated cells, mes-
`enchymal cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and
`many other cells are involved in the production
`of IL-6 in response to various stimuli (Akira
`et al. 1993). The fact that IL-6 issues a warning
`signal to indicate occurrence of an emergency
`accounts for the strict regulation of IL-6 synthe-
`sis both gene transcriptionally and posttran-
`scriptionally. A number of transcription factors
`have been shown to regulate the IL-6 gene tran-
`scription (Fig. 2). The functional cis-regula-
`0
`flank-
`tory elements in the human IL-6 gene 5
`ing region are found binding sites for NF-kB,
`specificity protein 1 (SP1), nuclear factor IL-6
`(NF-IL-6) (also known as CAAT/enhancer-
`binding protein b), activator protein 1 (AP-1),
`
`and interferon regulatory factor 1 (Libermann
`and Baltimore 1990; Akira and Kishimoto 1992;
`Matsusaka et al. 1993). Activation of cis-regu-
`latory elements by stimulation with IL-1, TNF,
`TLR-mediated signal, and forskolin lead to acti-
`vation of the IL-6 promoter.
`A polymorphism at position -174 of the IL-6
`promoter region is reportedly associated with
`systemic onset
`juvenile idiopathic arthritis
`(Fishman et al. 1998) and susceptibility to RA
`in Europeans (Lee et al. 2012). Stimulation with
`lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and IL-1 did not evoke
`any response in a reporter assay using -174 C
`construct. A -174 G construct, on the other
`hand, was found to promote transcription of
`the reporter gene, suggesting that a genetic back-
`
`MicroRNA
`
`Promotion
`
`Protein
`NF-κB, SP-1
`NF-IL-6, AP-1
`IRF1, Tax
`TAT, HBVX
`Mutant p53
`Repression Ahr,GR, ER miR-155 (targeting NF-IL-6)
`p53, Rb
`miR-146a/b (targeting IRAK1)
`PPARα
`miR-223 (targeting STAT3)
`
`Transcriptional regulation
`
`Stabilization
`
`Degradation
`
`MicroRNA
`
`miR-365
`miR-608
`
`Protein
`Arid5a
`P38α
`ORF57
`Regnase-1
`TTP
`BRF1
`BRF2
`
`Posttranscriptional regulation
`
`AP-1
`IRF1
`-283 ∼ -227 -267 ∼ -254
`
`E
`M R
`1 ∼ - 1
`5
`- 1
`
`3
`
`7
`
`F -I L - 6
`5 ∼ - 1
`
`4
`
`8
`
`5
`
`N
`- 1
`
`SP-1
`-123 ∼ -119
`
`SP-1
`-108 ∼ -104
`
`5′-AUUUUAAUUAUUUUUAAUUUAUUGAUAAUUUAAAUAAGU
`AAA CUUUAAGUUAAUUUAUGAUUGAUAUUUAUUAUUUUUA-3′
`AU-rich elements
`
`5′
`
`3′
`
`5′UTR
`
`IL-6 mRNA
`
`3′UTR
`
`NF-IL-6 NF-κB
`-87 ∼ -76
`-75 ∼ -63
`
`Figure 2. Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of IL-6 gene. The expression and degradation of IL-
`6 mRNA is regulated transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally by several proteins and microRNAs. Activation
`of these proteins and microRNAs determines the fate of IL-6 mRNA. NF-IL-6, nuclear factor of IL-6; Tax,
`transactivator protein; TAT, transactivator of the transcription; HBVX, hepatitis B virus X protein; Ahr, aryl
`hydrocarbon receptor; GR, glucocorticoid receptor; ER, estrogen receptor; Rb, retinoblastoma; PPARa, perox-
`isome proliferator– activated receptor a; miR, microRNA; IRAK1, IL-1 receptor– associated kinase 1; STAT3,
`signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; ORF, open reading frame; TTP, tristetraprolin; BRF1, butyrate
`response factor 1.
`
`4
`
`Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014;6:a016295
`
`CUREVAC EX2036
`Page 4
`
`

`

`ground of excess IL-6 production constitutes
`a risk factor for juvenile idiopathic arthritis
`and RA.
`An interesting finding is that some viral
`products enhance the DNA-binding activity of
`NF-kB and NF-IL-6, resulting in an increase in
`IL-6 mRNA transcription. An instance of this
`phenomenon is that interaction with NF-kB of
`the Tax derived from the human T lymphotropic
`virus 1 enhances IL-6 production (Ballard et al.
`1988; Leung and Nabel 1988). Another example
`is the enhancement of both NF-kB and NF-IL-6
`DNA-binding activity by the transactivator of
`the TAT protein of the human immunodeficien-
`cy virus 1 (Scala et al. 1994; Ambrosino et al.
`1997). Moreover, it has been shown that DNA
`binding of NF-IL-6 can be enhanced by the hu-
`man hepatitis B virus X protein (Mahe et al.
`1991; Ohno et al. 1999).
`On the other hand, some transcription fac-
`tors suppress IL-6 expression. Peroxisome pro-
`liferator– activated receptors (PPARs) are li-
`gand-activated transcription factors consisting
`of three subtypes: a, b, and g. Among three
`PPARs, fibrates-activated PPARa interacts with
`c-Jun and p65 NF-kB subunits, which negatively
`regulate IL-6 transcription (Delerive et al. 1999).
`In addition, some hormone receptors have been
`identified as repressors of IL-6 expression. The
`increase in serum IL-6 after menopause or ovar-
`ectomy is reportedly associated with suppres-
`sion of IL-6 expression by estrogen receptors
`(Jilka et al. 1992), whereas activation of the glu-
`cocorticoid receptor can repress IL-6 expression,
`and this is thought to be one of mechanisms
`responsible for the anti-inflammatory effects
`of corticosteroids (Ray and Prefontaine 1994).
`It has further been shown that retinoblastoma
`protein and p53 repress the IL-6 gene promoter,
`whereas it is up-regulated by mutant p53 (San-
`thanam et al. 1991).
`In addition, some microRNAs directly or
`indirectly regulate transcription activity. Inter-
`0
`untrans-
`action of microRNA-155 with the 3
`lated regions (UTR) of NF-IL-6 results in sup-
`pression of NF-IL-6 expression (He et al. 2009),
`whereas microRNA-146a/b and -223 indirect-
`ly suppress transcription of IL-6 by respec-
`tively targeting IL-1 receptor– associated kinase
`
`IL-6 in Inflammation, Immunity, and Disease
`
`1 and STAT3 (Chen et al. 2012; Zilahi et al.
`2012).
`
`PRODUCTION AND FUNCTION OF IL-6
`AND ARYL HYDROCARBON RECEPTOR
`
`Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (Ahr) not only
`affects IL-6 transcription, but also regulates in-
`nate and acquired immune response. Ahr, also
`known as the dioxin receptor, is a ligand-acti-
`vated transcription factor that belongs to the
`basic helix-loop-helix PER-ARNT-SIM family
`(Burbach et al. 1992; Ema et al. 1992). Ahr
`is present in the cytoplasm, where it forms a
`complex with Ahr-interacting protein (Bell
`and Poland 2000). On binding with a ligand,
`Ahr moves to the nucleus and dimerizes with
`the Ahr nuclear translocator (Arnt). Within the
`nucleus, the Ahr/Arnt heterodimer then binds
`to the xenobiotic response element (XRE),
`which leads to various toxicological effects (Fu-
`jii-Kuriyama et al. 1994; Dragan and Schrenk
`2000; Ohtake et al. 2003; Puga et al. 2005). Al-
`though the physiological ligands for Ahr are
`not well known, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase
`(IDO), which catalyzes tryptophan into kynu-
`renine, is induced by Ahr signaling and kynu-
`renine is one of the ligands of Ahr (Vogel et al.
`2008; Jux et al. 2009).
`An animal model of RA was used to show
`the essential role of Ahr in the induction of
`Th17 cells and Th17-dependent collagen-in-
`duced arthritis (CIA) (Kimura et al. 2008; Na-
`kahama et al. 2011). Stimulation of naı¨ve T cells
`with IL-6 plus TGF-b (Th17 cell – inducing
`condition) induced Ahr expression and dele-
`tion of the Ahr gene nullified the induction of
`Th17 cells.
`Ahr interacted with and inhibited the ac-
`tivities of STAT1 or STAT5, which mediate the
`anti-inflammatory signals of IL-27 and IFN-
`g, or IL-2, respectively (Harrington et al. 2005;
`Stumhofer et al. 2006; Laurence et al. 2007;
`Kimura et al. 2008), thus suppressing the inhib-
`itory signals for the induction of Th17 cells.
`Retinoid-related orphan receptors (ROR) g
`and a, which are activated by STAT3, are essen-
`tial transcription factors for Th17-cell induction
`(Ivanov et al. 2006; Yang et al. 2008) and Ahr was
`
`Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014;6:a016295
`
`5
`
`CUREVAC EX2036
`Page 5
`
`

`

`T. Tanaka et al.
`
`found not to affect the ROR-g and -a expres-
`sion. In the Ahr gene – deficient mice, no arthri-
`tis developed in CIA. Moreover, with T-cell-spe-
`cific deletion of the Ahr gene, no development of
`CIAwas observed (Nakahama et al. 2011). These
`results clearly show that CIA is a T-cell-depen-
`dent disease and the presence of Ahr is essential
`for its development. In these Ahr-deficient mice,
`the number of Th17 cells decreased and that of
`Th1 cells increased but no significant changes
`were observed in Foxp3-expressing Treg cells.
`Ahr also regulates Th17-cell
`induction
`through regulation of microRNAs. In our study,
`Ahr-induced microRNA-132/212 cluster under
`Th17 cell – inducing conditions and transfection
`of microRNA-212 into naı¨ve T cells under these
`circumstances augmented the expression of IL-
`17-related genes such as IL-17A, IL-22, and IL-
`23R (Nakahama et al. 2013). One of the target
`genes of this microRNA is B-cell lymphoma 6,
`which is known as an inhibitor of Th17-cell in-
`duction (Yu et al. 2009). All of these findings
`show that Ahr accelerates inflammation through
`the enhancement of Th17-cell induction by sev-
`eral mechanisms.
`Interestingly, Ahr showed a negative reg-
`ulatory effect on peritoneal macrophages and
`bone marrow – derived dendritic cells (BMDC)
`(Nguyen et al. 2010). In the absence of Ahr,
`LPS-induced production of inflammatory cy-
`tokines such as IL-6, TNF, and IL-12 showed
`major increases in macrophages,
`indicating
`that Ahr negatively regulates inflammatory cy-
`tokine production. Ahr interacts with STAT1
`and NF-kB and the resultant complex of Ahr/
`STAT1 and NF-kB leads to inhibition of the
`promoter activity of IL-6 and other inflamma-
`tory cytokines (Kimura et al. 2009). In BMDC,
`Ahr is required for the activation of IDO leading
`to kynurenine production because the deletion
`of Ahr in BMDC leads to loss of IL-10 and ky-
`nurenine production. Coculture of naı¨ve T cells
`with Ahr-deficient BMDC in the presence of
`LPS resulted in reduction of Treg-cell induction,
`whereas addition of kynurenine rescued the in-
`duction of Treg cells by BMDC (Nguyen et al.
`2010). These findings indicate that Ahr is re-
`quired for the regulatory BMDC cells through
`the induction of IDO.
`
`STABILIZATION AND DEGRADATION OF
`IL-6 MRNA (ARID5A AND REGNASE-1)
`
`As for posttranscriptional regulation of cyto-
`kine expression, cytokine mRNA is controlled
`0
`0
`through both the 5
`and 3
`UTR (Chen and Shyu
`1995; Anderson 2008). Initiation of mRNA
`0
`UTR, and
`translation is determined by the 5
`0
`the stability of mRNA by the 3
`UTR. IL-6
`mRNA is regulated by modulation of AU-rich
`0
`UTR region, whereas
`elements located in the 3
`a number of RNA-binding proteins and micro-
`0
`UTRs and regulate the
`RNAs bind to the 3
`stability of IL-6 mRNA (Fig. 2). For example,
`IL-6 mRNA stabilization is promoted by mito-
`gen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) p38a via
`0
`UTRs of IL-6 (Zhao et al. 2008), and the sta-
`3
`bilization of both viral and human IL-6 mRNA
`by the Kaposi’s sarcoma – associated herpesvi-
`rus (KSHV) ORF-57 by competing with the
`binding of microRNA-1293 to the viral or
`of microRNA-608 to the human IL-6 mRNA
`(Kang et al. 2011). RNA-binding proteins,
`such as TTP and BRF1 and 2, on the other
`hand, promote IL-6 mRNA degradation (Pala-
`nisamy et al. 2012), whereas IL-6 mRNA levels
`are reduced by microRNAs such as microRNA-
`365 and -608 through direct interaction with IL-
`0
`UTR (Kang et al. 2011; Xu et al. 2011).
`6 3
`It was recently found that a nuclease known
`as regulatory RNase-1 (regnase-1) (also known
`as Zc3h12a) plays a part in the destabilization
`of IL-6 mRNA, and that the relevant knockout
`mice spontaneously develop autoimmune dis-
`eases accompanied by splenomegaly and lymph-
`adenopathy (Matsushita et al. 2009). The in-
`hibitor of NF-kB (IkB) kinase (IKK) complex
`controls IL-6 mRNA stability by phosphorylat-
`ing regnase-1 in response to IL-1R/TLR stim-
`ulation (Iwasaki et al. 2011). Phosphorylated
`regnase-1 underwent ubiquitination and degra-
`dation. Regnase-1 re-expressed in IL-1R/TLR-
`activated cells was found to feature delayed ki-
`netics, and regnase-1 mRNA to be negatively
`regulated by regnase-1 itself via a stem-loop re-
`0
`UTR. These find-
`gion present in the regnase-1 3
`ings show that IKK complex phosphorylates not
`only IkBa, activating transcription, but also reg-
`nase-1, releasing the brake on IL-6 mRNA ex-
`
`6
`
`Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014;6:a016295
`
`CUREVAC EX2036
`Page 6
`
`

`

`pression. Regnase-1 also regulates the mRNAs of
`a set of genes, including c-Rel, Ox40, and IL-2
`0
`through cleavage of their 3
`UTRs in T cells. T-
`cell receptor engagement then leads to cleavage
`of regnase-1, which frees T cells from regnase-
`mediated suppression, thus indicating that reg-
`nase-1 may play a crucial role in T-cell activation
`(Uehata et al. 2013).
`We have recently identified a novel RNA-
`binding protein, AT-rich interactive domain-
`containing protein 5a (Arid5a), which binds
`0
`UTR of IL-6 mRNA, resulting in the
`to the 3
`selective stabilization of IL-6 but not of TNF-a
`or IL-12 mRNA (Masuda et al. 2013). Arid5a
`expression was found to be enhanced in macro-
`phages in response to LPS, IL-1b, and IL-6, and
`also to be induced under Th17-polarizing con-
`ditions in T cells. We also found that Arid5a gene
`deficiency inhibited elevation of IL-6 levels in
`LPS-injected mice and preferential Th17-cell
`development in experimental autoimmune en-
`cephalomyelitis. Moreover, Arid5a counteracted
`the destabilizing function of regnase-1 on IL-6
`mRNA (Fig. 3), indicating that the balance be-
`tween Arid5a and regnase-1 plays an important
`
`IL-6 in Inflammation, Immunity, and Disease
`
`role in IL-6 mRNA stability. All of these results
`suggest that posttranscriptional regulation of
`IL-6 mRNA by Arid5a and regnase-1 may play
`an important role in the expression of IL-6 and
`that the predominance of Arid5a over regnase-1
`promotes inflammatory processes and possibly
`induces the development of autoimmune in-
`flammatory diseases.
`During the so-called “cytokine storm,” a po-
`tentially fatal immune reaction induced by hy-
`peractivation of T cells, a major boost in IL-6
`production is observed but without comparable
`production of other inflammatory cytokines. A
`recent study showed that the cytokine storm
`induced by cancer immunotherapy using T-
`cell transfection was counteracted by the anti-
`IL-6 receptor antibody, tocilizumab (Grupp et
`al. 2013). Experimentally, inhalation by mice of
`peroxidized phospholipids induced a cytokine
`storm resulting from a greatly marked increase
`in the production of IL-6 but not TNF (Imai
`et al. 2008).
`These results showing the IL-6-specific ele-
`vation without any effect on the other inflam-
`matory cytokines strongly suggest the impor-
`
`LPS
`
`MD2
`
`TLR4
`
`IL-6
`
`MyD88
`
`IκΒ
`
`NF-κΒ
`
`IL-6
`Arid5a
`Regnase-1
`
`NF-κΒ
`
`mRNA
`
`Arid5a
`
`Regnase-1
`
`5′UTR
`
`IL-6 mRNA
`
`3′UTR
`
`Regnase-1
`
`5′UTR
`
`IL-6 mRNA
`degradation
`
`3′UTR
`
`Figure 3. IL-6 synthesis and regulation of IL-6 mRNA stability by Arid5a. Pathogen-associated molecular
`patterns are recognized by pathogen-recognition receptors to induce proinflammatory cytokines; in this figure,
`TLR4 recognizes LPS and induces IL-6 mRNA via activation of the NF-kB signaling pathway. Regnase-1
`promotes IL-6 mRNA degradation, whereas Arid5a inhibits destabilizing effects of regnase-1. The balance
`between Arid5a and regnase-1 is important for the regulation of IL-6 mRNA. MD2, myeloid differentiation
`protein 2; MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; IkB, inhibitor of NF-kB.
`
`Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014;6:a016295
`
`7
`
`CUREVAC EX2036
`Page 7
`
`

`

`T. Tanaka et al.
`
`tance of posttranscriptional modification of IL-
`6 mRNA by Arid5a and regnase-1. The balance
`between Arid5a and regnase-1 may determine
`the pathological increase of IL-6 in various dis-
`eases including autoimmunity and even cyto-
`kine storm.
`
`IL-6 RECEPTOR–MEDIATED SIGNALING
`SYSTEM
`
`The IL-6 receptor– signaling system is made up
`of two receptor chains and downstream sig-
`naling molecules (Kishimoto et al. 1992). The
`IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) constitutes the IL-6-bind-
`ing chain, which occurs in two forms, 80 kDa
`transmembrane and 50 – 55 kDa – soluble IL-6R
`(sIL-6R), whereas 130 kDa gp130 constitutes
`the signal-transducing chain. Both of these
`proteins belong to the cytokine receptor family
`with a Trp-Ser-X-Trp-Ser motif (Yamasaki et al.
`1988; Hibi et al. 1990). sIL-6R without the cy-
`toplasmic region is present in human serum and
`after IL-6 binding to sIL-6R; the resultant com-
`plex induces the IL-6 signal on gp130-express-
`ing cells (Narazaki et al. 1993). The pleiotropic
`effect of IL-6 on various cells derives from the
`broad range of gp130 expression observed on
`cells (Taga and Kishimoto 1997). After binding
`
`of IL-6 to IL-6R, the IL-6/IL-6R complex in turn
`induces homodimerization of gp130 and trig-
`gers a downstream signal cascade (Fig. 4) (Mu-
`rakami et al. 1993). The activated IL-6 receptor
`complex is generated in the form of a hexamer-
`ic structure comprising two molecules each of
`IL-6, IL-6R, and gp130 (Boulanger et al. 2003).
`Of these components, IL-6R is a unique bind-
`ing-receptor for IL-6, whereas the signal-trans-
`ducing chain gp130 is shared by members of the
`IL-6 family of cytokines, that is, leukemia in-
`hibitory factor, oncostatin M, ciliary neurotro-
`phic factor, IL-11, cardiotrophin 1, cardiotro-
`phin-like cytokine, IL-27, and IL-35. Although
`all of these cytokines thus bind to their specific
`binding receptors, they use the same gp130 for
`their signals (Kishimoto et al. 1994, 1995). The
`only exception is virus-encoded IL-6, which is
`the product of KSHV (also known as human
`herpesvirus 8), and directly binds to and acti-
`vates gp130 (Aoki et al. 2001). The mechanism
`that the IL-6 cytokine family members use to
`employ the common signal transducer makes
`it clear why members of the IL-6 family show
`functional redundancy. The molecular elucida-
`tion of the IL-6-signaling system finally solved
`the long-standing mystery of why cytokines fea-
`tured pleiotropy and redundancy.
`
`IL-6
`
`Tocilizumab
`
`IL-6 receptor
`
`Soluble IL-6
`receptor
`
`gp130
`
`JAKs
`
`STAT3
`
`SHP-2
`
`MAPKs
`
`Figure 4. IL-6 receptor system and IL-6 blocker, a humanized anti-IL-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab. IL-6
`binds to soluble and transmembrane IL-6R and the complex, then induces homodimerization of gp130, leading
`to activation of the signaling system. A humanized anti-IL-6R antibody, tocilizumab, blocks IL-6-mediated
`signaling pathway by its inhibition of IL-6 binding to both receptors. JAKs, Janus kinases; SHP-2, SH2-domain
`containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-2.
`
`8
`
`Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014;6:a016295
`
`CUREVAC EX2036
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Activation of gp130 in turn triggers activa-
`tion of downstream signaling molecules, that is,
`the Janus kinase (JAK)-STAT3 pathway and the
`JAK-SHP-2-mitogen-activated protein (MAP)
`kinase pathway. The regulation of various sets
`of IL-6 responsive genes, including acute phase
`proteins, is accounted for by the transcription
`factor STAT3, which also induces the suppressor
`of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) and SOCS3,
`which share the SH2-domain. In this context,
`SOCS1 binds to tyrosine-phosphorylated JAK
`(Naka et al. 1997), whereas SOCS3 binds to
`tyrosine-phosphorylated gp130 (Schmitz et al.
`2000) to stop IL-6 signaling by means of a neg-
`ative feedback loop.
`
`IL-6 AND DISEASE
`
`An immediate and transient expression of IL-6
`is generated in response to environmental stress
`factors such as infections and tissue injuries.
`This expression triggers an alarm signal and ac-
`tivates host defense mechanisms against stress.
`Removal of the source of stress from the host
`is followed by cessation of IL-6-mediated acti-
`vation of the signal-transduction cascade by
`negative regulatory systems such as ligand-in-
`duced internalization and degradation of gp130
`and recruitment of SOCS (Naka et al. 1997), as
`well as degradation of IL-6 mRNA by regnase-1
`leading to termination of IL-6 production.
`However, dysregulated and persistent IL-6 pro-
`duction of mostly unknown etiology, one of
`which may be the unbalance between Arid5a
`and regnase-1, in certain cell populations leads
`to the development of various diseases. This
`association of IL-6 with disease development
`was first shown in a case of cardiac myxoma.
`The culture of fluid obtained from the myxoma
`tissues of a patient who presented with fever,
`polyarthritis with positivity for antinuclear fac-
`tor, elevated CRP level, and hypergammaglo-
`bulinemia, contained a large quantity of IL-6,
`which suggested that IL-6 may contribute to
`chronic inflammation and autoimmunity (Hi-
`rano et al. 1987). Subsequent studies have shown
`that dysregulation of IL-6 production occurs in
`the synovial cells of RA (Hirano et al. 1988),
`swollen lymph nodes of Castleman’s disease
`
`IL-6 in Inflammation, Immunity, and Disease
`
`(Yoshizaki et al. 1989), myeloma cells (Kawano
`et al. 1988), and peripheral blood cells or in-
`volved tissues in various other autoimmune
`and chronic inflammatory diseases and even
`malignant cells in cancers (Nishimoto et al.
`1989, 2005).
`Moreover, the pathological role of IL-6 in
`disease development has been shown in numer-
`ous animal models of diseases as well as the fact
`that IL-6 blockade by means of gene knockout or
`administration of anti-IL-6 or anti-IL-6R Ab
`can result in the preventive or therapeutic sup-
`pression of disease development. For example,
`IL-6 blockade resulted in a noticeable reduc-
`tion in susceptibility to Castleman’s disease –
`like symptoms in IL-6 transgenic mice (Katsume
`et al. 2002). Similar effects were observed in
`models of RA (Alonzi et al. 1998; Ohshima et
`al. 1998; Fujimoto et al. 2008), systemic lupus
`erythematosus (Mihara et al. 1998), systemic
`sclerosis (Kitaba et al. 2012), inflammatory my-
`opathies (Okiyama et al. 2009), experimental
`autoimmune uveoretinitis (Haruta et al. 2011),
`experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
`(Serada et al. 2008), and many other diseases.
`
`IL-6 TARGETING AS STRATEGY FOR
`TREATMENT OF IMMUNE-MEDIATED
`DISEASES
`
`In view of the range of biological activities of IL-
`6 and its pathological role in various diseases
`described above, it was anticipated that IL-6 tar-
`geting would constitute a novel treatment strat-
`egy for various immune-mediated diseases. The
`development of tocilizumab was a direct r

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket