throbber
NIH Public Access
`Author Manuscript
`Mol Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 November 10.
`Published in final edited form as:
`Mol Ther. 2008 November ; 16(11): 1833–1840. doi:10.1038/mt.2008.200.
`
`Incorporation of Pseudouridine Into mRNA Yields Superior
`Nonimmunogenic Vector With Increased Translational Capacity
`and Biological Stability
`
`Katalin Karikó1, Hiromi Muramatsu1, Frank A Welsh1, János Ludwig2, Hiroki Kato3, Shizuo
`Akira3, and Drew Weissman4
`1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
`2Laboratory of RNA Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA
`3Department of Host Defense, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka,
`Japan
`4Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
`
`Abstract
`In vitro–transcribed mRNAs encoding physiologically important proteins have considerable
`potential for therapeutic applications. However, in its present form, mRNA is unfeasible for clinical
`use because of its labile and immunogenic nature. Here, we investigated whether incorporation of
`naturally modified nucleotides into transcripts would confer enhanced biological properties to
`mRNA. We found that mRNAs containing pseudouridines have a higher translational capacity than
`unmodified mRNAs when tested in mammalian cells and lysates or administered intravenously into
`mice at 0.015–0.15 mg/kg doses. The delivered mRNA and the encoded protein could be detected
`in the spleen at 1, 4, and 24 hours after the injection, where both products were at significantly higher
`levels when pseudouridine-containing mRNA was administered. Even at higher doses, only the
`unmodified mRNA was immunogenic, inducing high serum levels of interferon-(cid:302) (IFN-(cid:302)). These
`findings indicate that nucleoside modification is an effective approach to enhance stability and
`translational capacity of mRNA while diminishing its immunogenicity in vivo. Improved properties
`conferred by pseudouridine make such mRNA a promising tool for both gene replacement and
`vaccination.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`In vitro–synthesized mRNA seems an ideal nonviral gene replacement tool with many inherent
`advantages, including rapid protein production and efficient transduction of primary cells
`(reviewed in ref. 1). mRNA-based therapy also avoids deleterious side effects (e.g., integration
`into chromosomes) that limit clinical application of most virus- and DNA-based vectors.2 The
`first in vivo gene transfer therapy using mRNA was reported in 1990 (ref. 3). Subsequently,
`however, mRNA has rarely been used for introducing genetic material into animals or even
`into cultured cells. The use of mRNA has been mostly limited to vaccination in which antigen-
`encoding transcripts were administered in vivo or delivered to dendritic cells (DCs) ex vivo in
`
`© The American Society of Gene Therapy
`Correspondence: Katalin Karikó, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Room 371 Stemmler Hall, 36th & Hamilton
`Walk, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6087, USA. kariko@mail.med.upenn.edu.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`CUREVAC EX2033
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Karikó et al.
`
`Page 2
`
`order to induce cellular and humoral immune responses.4,5 However, RNA is unsuitable for
`gene replacement because of its high immunogenicity and low effectiveness.
`
`Recent studies have demonstrated that RNA activates cells of the innate immune system by
`stimulating Toll-like receptors (TLRs), specifically TLR3, TLR7, and TLR8.6–8 However,
`when naturally occurring modified nucleosides, for example, pseudouridine ((cid:524)), 5-
`methylcytidine (m5C), N6-methyladenosine (m6A), 5-methyluridine (m5U), or 2-thiouridine
`(s2U) were incorporated into the transcript, most of the TLRs were no longer activated.9 The
`immunostimulatory potential of such RNAs as measured by proinflammatory cytokine release
`and induction of co-stimulatory molecules was greatly diminished.9 Hartmann et al. also
`reported that modified nucleosides, including s2U and (cid:524), abrogated 5(cid:397)-triphosphate RNA-
`mediated activation of another RNA-responsive immune sensor, retinoic acid-inducible protein
`I (RIG-I).10 If any of the in vitro transcripts containing nucleoside modifications would remain
`translatable and also avoid immune activation in vivo, such an mRNA could be developed into
`a new therapeutic tool for both gene replacement and vaccination. Accordingly, in this report,
`we tested the nucleoside-modified mRNAs for their translational potentials and in vivo immune
`characteristics.
`
`Our results reveal that incorporating pseudouridine, a naturally occurring modified nucleoside,
`into mRNA not only suppresses RNA-mediated immune activation in vitro and in vivo, but
`also enhances the translational capacity of the RNA. These characteristics and the ease of
`generating such an RNA by in vitro transcription make (cid:524)-containing mRNA a unique tool for
`expression of any protein in vitro and in vivo.
`
`RESULTS
`In vitro transcription and translation of nucleoside-modified mRNAs
`In nature, RNA is synthesized from adenosine triphosphate, uridine triphosphate, cytidine
`triphosphate, and guanosine triphosphate. After transcription, selected nucleosides become
`modified. Due to technical limitations, at present, the simplest method to generate RNA with
`modified nucleosides is to perform in vitro transcription reactions in which one of the four
`basic nucleotide triphosphates is replaced with a corresponding modified nucleotide
`triphosphate.9 In these transcripts, one particular nucleotide is substituted with the modified
`nucleotide at every position. In a series of transcription reactions using reporter protein–
`encoding plasmids and RNA polymerases, we obtained full-length transcripts containing (cid:524),
`m5U, s2U, m6A, or m5C (Figure 1a). Structures of these nucleosides are shown in
`Supplementary Figure S1. Under similar transcriptional conditions, we were unable to obtain
`full-length mRNA containing other naturally occurring nucleosides such as N1-
`methylguanosine, N1-methyladenosine, N7-methylguanosine, 2(cid:397)-O-methyluridine, and 2(cid:397)-O-
`methylcytidine.
`
`First, a set of nucleoside-modified mRNAs encoding firefly luciferase (TEVlucA50) and
`Renilla luciferase (capRen) (Supplementary Figure S2) was tested to determine whether they
`were translated in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. By measuring the enzyme activity of the encoded
`proteins, we were surprised to find that (cid:524)-containing mRNA translated more efficiently than
`its unmodified counterpart, resulting in twice as much protein from both TEVlucA50 and
`capRen templates (Figure 1b). The translational yield of mRNAs with m5U or m5C was similar
`to the unmodified transcripts, while mRNAs containing s2U translated poorly. The presence
`of m6A in mRNAs completely abolished their translatability. The (cid:524)-mediated translational
`enhancement was not observed in all translational systems. In wheat germ extracts, ~50% less
`protein was produced from the (cid:524)-containing mRNAs compared with unmodified mRNAs,
`while in bacterial cell lysates, mRNAs with (cid:524)-modifications were not translated (Figure 1b).
`Analyses of radiolabeled translational products generated in reticulocyte lysates confirmed that
`
`Mol Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 November 10.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`CUREVAC EX2033
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Karikó et al.
`
`Page 3
`
`lack of luciferase activities in samples programmed with s2U- and m6A-containing mRNAs
`were indeed due to lack of translation rather than loss of enzyme activity as a result of amino
`acid misincorporation caused by the modified nucleosides (Figure 1c). Although (cid:524) has not
`been found in any mRNA,11 its ability to form hydrogen bonds with adenosine is similar to
`that of uridine (Figure 1d), a structural characteristic that should allow efficient translation of
`such an mRNA.
`
`Superior translation of pseudouridine-containing mRNAs in cultured cells
`To determine whether the nucleoside-modified mRNAs are translated in cultured cells, sets of
`Renilla luciferase–encoding mRNAs were lipofectin complexed and delivered into 293 cells.
`mRNA containing (cid:524) translated ~10 times as much as unmodified mRNA, while the presence
`of m5C led to a fourfold enhancement (Figure 2a). mRNAs with s2U or m6A constituents, as
`in the cell-free system, were poorly or not at all translated. The translational capacity of mRNA
`in which only 5% of the adenosines were substituted with m6A, a composition closer to that
`which occurs in nature,11 was equivalent to that of the unmodified transcript. Similar results
`were obtained when sets of mRNAs with nucleoside modifications were tested in primary cells,
`including mouse DCs, embryonic fibroblasts and splenocytes, and human DCs (Figure 2b and
`data not shown). Control and (cid:524)-containing mRNAs delivered by polyethyleneimine (PEI) gave
`results consistent with those obtained with lipofectin (Supplementary Figure S3).
`
`In all of cell types, the (cid:524) modification conferred the highest translational yield to RNA and,
`because it was one of the nucleoside modifications that abolished RNA-mediated activation
`of primary DCs,9 as well as interferon (IFN) induction by RIG-I,10 subsequent studies focused
`on (cid:524)-modified mRNAs. To determine whether superior translation of (cid:524)-containing transcripts
`was dependent on structural elements known to enhance translation of the mRNA, a set of
`firefly luciferase–encoding mRNAs were synthesized with a unique 5(cid:397)-untranslated sequence
`(TEV, a cap-independent translational enhancer12), cap and/or poly(A) tail, or no additional
`sequences. As expected, these structural elements enhanced translational efficiency of the
`mRNA and presence of (cid:524) in the transcripts further increased the amount of protein made from
`all tested constructs (Figure 2c), demonstrating that (cid:524)-mediated translational enhancement is
`independent of cap and poly(A) tail. The most efficiently translated mRNAs
`(capTEVlucA50) were extended with longer poly(A) tails, which is known to enhance
`translation,12 and analyzed in time-course studies. mRNA with (cid:524) modification was translated
`to a greater extent than unmodified RNA at every tested time point and, as the incubation time
`increased, the difference between levels of luciferase made from the two types of mRNAs also
`increased (Figure 2d). Considering the short functional half-life of luciferase in mammalian
`cells and the fact that at 8–50 hours after transfection, cells programmed with (cid:524)-containing
`mRNA had unproportionally higher luciferase level, it is likely that (cid:524)-modification stabilizes
`the mRNA.
`
`Routinely, (cid:533)-galactosidase (lacZ)- and green fluorescent protein (GFP)–encoding constructs
`are used to visualize viral- or plasmid vector–mediated gene expression. Accordingly, we
`generated lacZ and GFP mRNAs (Supplementary Figure S2) with or without (cid:524) to use this
`detection system. To enhance translation, a subset of the RNAs was also extended with poly
`(A) tail. Analyses of 293 cells at 24 hours following RNA delivery demonstrated that the
`presence of (cid:524) in the mRNA significantly improved translational capacity of all tested RNA
`(caplacZ, caplacZ-An, and capGFP-An) as compared to the corresponding control, uridine-
`containing transcripts (Figure 2e and f). Not only did more cells express the encoded proteins
`when (cid:524)-modified mRNAs were used, but also the cells exhibited more intense staining,
`suggesting higher cellular levels of those proteins (Figure 2e and f and Supplementary Figure
`S4). The level of GFP staining in both number of positive cell and intensity was proportional
`to the amounts of delivered capGFP-An RNA added to cells cultured (Figure 2f). Transfection
`
`Mol Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 November 10.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`CUREVAC EX2033
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Karikó et al.
`
`Page 4
`
`of GFP mRNA containing (cid:524) modification resulted in higher levels of GFP expression in
`Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells as well as in cultured primary neurons from rat brain cortex
`(Figure 2g).
`
`Superior translation of (cid:524)-containing mRNA is independent of RIG-I
`RIG-I, a cytoplasmic sensor of pathogenic RNA, is ubiquitously present in all cells.13 It directs
`type I IFN secretion when exposed to RNA containing 5(cid:397)-triphoshate; however, replacement
`of uridine with (cid:524) in RNA blocks such an activation.10 The RNA samples we have synthesized
`and analyzed, including a significant fraction of those transcribed in the presence of cap analog,
`contained a 5(cid:397)-triphoshate. This raises the possibility that the observed translational differences
`between U- and (cid:524)-containing RNA (Figure 2) were caused by type I IFN, secreted when RIG-
`I was exposed to uridine- but not to (cid:524)-containing RNA. To address the role of RIG-I and type
`I IFN in the differential translation of the two RNA types, mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs)
`derived from RIGI((cid:237)/(cid:237)) and wild-type mice were treated with U- or (cid:524)-containing mRNAs,
`and then translation and IFN induction were measured. Transcripts containing either 5(cid:397)-
`triphosphates (ppplucA50) or cap (capTEVluc-An) were tested. (cid:524)-containing mRNA was
`translated at increased levels compared to U-containing mRNA independent from the presence
`of RIG-I (Figure 3). As expected, the level of IFN-(cid:533) secreted by wild-type MEFs greatly
`diminished when the triphosphates were replaced with cap at the 5(cid:397)-ends of U-containing RNAs
`(Figure 3a and b).
`
`Most important, the U-containing mRNA did not induce IFN-(cid:533) from the RIG-I((cid:237)/(cid:237)) MEFs but
`was still translated less efficiently than (cid:524)-containing mRNA (Figure 3), making unlikely that
`translational differences were mediated by RIG-I-induced IFN actions.
`
`Efficient translation of (cid:524)-containing mrnA in mice
`For in vivo studies, we used firefly luciferase–encoding mRNA because, unlike other reporter
`enzymes (e.g., (cid:533)-galactosidase, Renilla luciferase), no endogenous mammalian enzyme
`interferes with its detection. The transcripts, unmodified and (cid:524)-modified capTEVlucA50, were
`extended with ~200-nt long poly(A) tails to increase their translatability (Figure 4a). mRNAs
`were lipofectin complexed and injected into mice through their caudal veins. Intravenous
`administration of 0.3-(cid:541)g capTEVluc-An containing (cid:524) resulted in high luciferase activity in the
`spleen, but not in the lung, liver, heart, kidney, or brain (Figure 4b), thus in subsequent studies
`only spleens were examined. Before analysis, spleens were bisected with one-half used for
`luciferase enzyme measurements and the other half for RNA isolation and subsequent northern
`blotting. First, the efficacies of (cid:524)-modified and unmodified capTEVluc-An mRNAs at 0.015
`mg/kg (0.3 (cid:541)g/animal) dose were compared in time-course experiments. Luciferase activity
`was readily detectable at 1 hour, peaked at 4 hours, and declined by 24 hours after mRNA
`administration (Figure 4c). At 1 and 4 hours, significantly more (up to 12-fold) luciferase
`activity was detected in animals that received the (cid:524)-modified mRNA compared to those
`injected with the unmodified mRNA. By 24 hours, the only samples with detectable levels of
`luciferase (fourfold above background) were from animals injected with (cid:524)-containing mRNA.
`The overall expression patterns were similar when mRNAs encoding Renilla luciferase
`(capRen with or without (cid:524) modifications) were injected into the animals or when isolated
`mouse splenocytes were exposed to mRNAs in culture (Supplementary Figure S5). Northern
`analyses of splenic RNA revealed that the administered mRNAs, in their intact and partially
`degraded forms, were readily detectable at 15 minutes, 1 hour, and 4 hours postinjection (Figure
`4d and Supplementary Figure S6). Because pilot studies demonstrated that the hybridization
`properties of (cid:524)-modified and unmodified RNAs are the same, we conclude that although equal
`amounts of the delivered mRNA reached the spleens, more (cid:524)-containing mRNA than control
`mRNA remained at 1 and 4 hours (Figure 4d and Supplementary Figure S6). By 24 hours,
`unmodified capTEVluc-An was below the level of detection, but trace amounts of (cid:524)-containing
`
`Mol Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 November 10.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`CUREVAC EX2033
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Karikó et al.
`
`Page 5
`
`capTEVluc-An, though partially degraded, were detectable (Figure 4d). These results suggest
`that presence of (cid:524) in RNA likely increases its biological stability. By altering the mRNA-lipid
`formulation, the delivery of greater amounts of mRNAs resulted in proportionally greater
`production of luciferase in cultured cells (Supplementary Figure S7). To determine whether
`protein production from the encoding mRNAs increases similarly in vivo, mRNAs were
`administered at 0.015–0.150 mg/kg doses, corresponding to delivery of 0.3–3.0 (cid:541)g capTEVluc-
`An per animal. Six hours later, the mice were killed and their spleens were analyzed. We found
`that luciferase levels were proportional to the amount of injected RNAs (Figure 4e). At these
`doses of RNA, luciferase levels were 12- to 78-fold higher when (cid:524)-modified capTEVluc-An
`was injected compared to the corresponding unmodified capTEVluc-An (Figure 4e). Again,
`no luciferase activity could be detected in any of the other organs even in animals injected with
`the highest dose of mRNA. For comparison, 3.0 (cid:541)g of pCMVluc plasmid was injected in a
`similar manner, but no luciferase activity could be detected in any organ when analyzed 24
`hours postadministration (Figure 4e and data not shown).
`
`(cid:524)-Modified mRNA is nonimmunogenic in mice
`We recently demonstrated that unmodified RNA, in contrast to (cid:524)-modified RNA, activated
`human DCs to secrete IFN-(cid:302) and tumor necrosis factor-(cid:302) (TNF-(cid:302)).9 In order to demonstrate
`whether (cid:524)-modified RNA activated the innate immune system after in vivo systemic delivery,
`serum samples were collected from animals at 6 hours postinjection and tested for
`proinflammatory cytokines. We found high IFN-(cid:302) levels only in those animals that were
`injected with 3.0 (cid:541)g of unmodified capTEVluc-An, but not with the (cid:524)-modified capTEVluc-
`An (Figure 4f). Although TNF-(cid:302) protein was below the detection level in the collected serum
`samples, northern blot analysis demonstrated the highest amount of TNF-(cid:302) mRNA in the spleen
`of animals that were administered unmodified mRNA at 4 hours postinjection (Figure 4d).
`
`DISCUSSION
`Progress in understanding the molecular details of many human diseases and instant access to
`human gene collections brings the possibility of using genes for treatment closer to reality.
`However, safe and effective gene therapy, which would take advantage of all these recent
`achievements, is still lacking. Unlike viral- and plasmid-based vectors, in vitro–transcribed
`mRNAs have never been vigorously tested for in vivo gene replacement, only for therapeutic
`vaccination (reviewed in ref. 14), because they were generally considered labile, inefficient,
`and immunogenic. Our most significant finding, however, demonstrates that in vitro–
`transcribed mRNAs containing pseudouridines possess superior translational capacities,
`increased biological stability, and no immunogenicity. The potential therapeutic advantages
`of using mRNA, especially (cid:524)-containing mRNA, over plasmid and viral vectors for delivering
`genetic material are numerous: (i) improved safety, because RNA is inherently incapable of
`integrating into the genome, thus preventing deleterious side effects that have stalled other
`vectors;2 (ii) lack of inflammatory response to (cid:524)-containing mRNA, thereby avoiding
`devastating systemic inflammation that can be fatal with a viral vector;15 (iii) efficient
`transduction of primary cells, unlike DNA, RNA does not require cell proliferation for
`expression of the encoded protein; (iv) rapid protein expression, mRNAs are translated within
`minutes following entry into the cytoplasm, whereas plasmids require time-consuming nuclear
`import and transcription; (v) virtually no size limit for the encoded proteins, because long
`mRNAs (we have generated 12-kb long mRNAs) can be easily obtained, unlike viral vectors
`that possess limited packaging capacities; (vi) the extent and duration of the encoded protein
`expression can be closely controlled because mRNAs have shorter half lives and, unlike other
`vectors, do not replicate; and (vii) manufacturing of mRNA is much simpler than producing
`viral or plasmid vectors, one DNA template can be transcribed many (~100) times and, by
`immobilizing the template, the process is adaptable for large scale continuous production in
`
`Mol Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 November 10.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`CUREVAC EX2033
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Karikó et al.
`
`Page 6
`
`bioreactors.16 Overall, these beneficial characteristics make (cid:524)-containing mRNA an excellent
`tool not only for in vivo expression of therapeutic proteins but also for vaccination. In the latter
`case, coadministration of adjuvant (e.g., immunostimulatory oligo-DNA, lipopolysaccha-ride)
`would also be required.
`
`Our most surprising result is that mRNAs with (cid:524) modification have a higher translational
`capacity than those without modification in all tested mammalian systems. Although further
`studies are needed to understand the reason for this difference fully, using RIG-I((cid:237)/(cid:237)) MEFs,
`we excluded a role for RIG-I and type I IFN in this phenomenon (Figure 3). It is possible that
`protein synthesis might be inhibited by RNA-dependent protein kinase activated by structural
`motifs present in mRNA-containing uridine17 but not (cid:524) modification. Consistent with this
`interpretation, attenuated translation of nonmodified mRNAs as compared to (cid:524)-modified
`mRNAs was observed in mammalian cells and lysates that contain RNA-dependent protein
`kinase but not observed in wheat germ extracts (Figures 1b and 2), which have no RNA-
`dependent protein kinase.18
`
`A likely contributing factor to the enhanced translation observed with (cid:524) modification is an
`increase in biological stability of the mRNAs (Figure 4d). Indeed, higher resistance to
`hydrolysis by phosphodiesterases from snake venom and spleen has been reported when uridine
`was replaced with (cid:524) in dinucleotide substrates.19 Previous studies have also demonstrated that
`(cid:524) stabilizes RNA secondary structures by promoting base stacking,20 which could slow
`degradation. However, stability of mRNAs containing either uridines or pseudouridines was
`the same when tested by in vitro assays using human skin–associated RNases21 (data not
`shown). Enhanced translation might be another factor that improves stability by protecting the
`RNA with high ribosome occupancy.
`
`From a potential adverse event standpoint, it is important to note that (cid:524), a natural constituent
`of RNA, likely lacks toxicity. In fact, (cid:524) is the most common modification found in RNA and
`natural pathways for metabolism of (cid:524)-modified mRNA and subsequent disposal into the urine
`exist.22
`
`In previous studies, we demonstrated that bacterial RNA and in vitro transcripts without
`modified nucleoside constituents stimulated human TLR3, TLR7, and TLR8, while
`mammalian RNA and in vitro transcripts containing nucleoside modifications including (cid:524)
`were minimally or nonstimulatory.9 We also observed high levels of TNF-(cid:302) and IFN-(cid:302)
`secretion by human primary DCs when exposed to RNAs that lacked nucleoside modification,
`but not when (cid:524)-modified RNAs were used.9 Because mammalian RNA, unlike bacterial RNA,
`abundantly possesses modified nucleosides, these results collectively demonstrate that
`nucleoside modifications suppress RNA immunogenicity. This study extends these findings
`to in vivo conditions by showing induction of IFN-(cid:302) secretion and an increase of TNF-(cid:302) mRNA
`in mice following administration of unmodified, but not (cid:524) modified, mRNA (Figure 4d and
`f).
`
`In summary, we demonstrate that mRNA containing (cid:524) is a new and effective vector to deliver
`genetic material for protein expression into both cultured cells and animals. The presence of
`(cid:524) in mRNA improved its translational capacity and overall stability. It also diminished its
`immunogenicity in vivo. Administering (cid:524)-containing mRNA at very low doses (0.015 mg/kg)
`resulted in robust expression of the encoded protein. We identified spleen as the target organ
`where the intravenously delivered, lipofectin-complexed mRNA and its encoded protein
`accumulate. These collective findings are important steps in developing the therapeutic
`potential of mRNA, such as using modified mRNA as an alternative to conventional
`vaccination and as a means for expressing clinically beneficial proteins in vivo safely and
`effectively.
`
`Mol Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 November 10.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`CUREVAC EX2033
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Karikó et al.
`
`Page 7
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`mRNA synthesis and characterization
`For templates, reporter plasmids encoding firefly luciferase (pTEVluc, pTEVlucA50, pLuc,
`and pLucA50)12 (Daniel Gallie, University of California at Riverside, CA), Renilla luciferase
`(pSVren),23 bacterial (cid:533)-galactosidase (placZ) (Jay Hecker, University of Pennsylvania, PA),
`and enhanced GFP (peGFP) were used. Plasmid peGFP was generated by inserting coding
`sequences from pEGFP-N3 (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) into the EcoRV site of pT7TS
`(Paul Krieg, University of Texas at Austin, TX) containing the corresponding 5(cid:397)- and 3(cid:397)-
`untranslated region sequences of Xenopus (cid:533)-globin mRNA and a stretch of dA30dC30. First,
`plasmids were linearized with BamHI (pTEVluc, pLuc), NdeI (pTEVlucA50, pLucA50), SspI
`(pSVren), or XbaI/SalI (placZ, peGFP) to generate templates. Transcriptions were performed
`at 37 °C for 3 hours using T7 or SP6 RNA polymerases and nucleotide triphosphates at 7.5
`mmol/l final concentration (MEGAscript kits; Ambion, Austin, TX). To obtain mRNAs with
`modified nucleosides, the transcription reaction was assembled with the replacement of one
`nucleotide triphosphate with the corresponding triphosphate derivative of the following
`modified nucleosides: 5-methylcytidine (m5C), 5-methyluridine (m5U), 2-thiouridine (s2U),
`N6-methyladenosine (m6A), pseudouridine ((cid:524)), N1-methylguanosine (m1G), N1-
`methyladenosine (m1A), 2(cid:397)-O-methyluridine (Um), 2(cid:397)-O-methylcytidine (Cm) (TriLink, San
`Diego, CA), or N7-methylguanosine (m7G) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Where noted, only 5%
`of the adenosine triphosphate was replaced with N6-methyladenosine triphosphates in the
`reaction (5% m6A mRNA). Capped mRNAs were generated by supplementing the
`transcription reactions with 6 mmol/l 3(cid:397)-O-Me-m7GpppG, a nonreversible cap analog, (New
`England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) and lowering the concentration of guanosine triphosphate
`(3.75 mmol/l). Selected mRNAs were also poly(A) tailed in a reaction of ~1.5 (cid:541)g/(cid:541)l RNA, 5
`mmol/l adenosine triphosphate, and 60 U/(cid:541)l yeast poly(A) polymerase (USB, Cleveland, OH)
`according to the manufacturer's instructions and incubated at 30 °C for 3 hours. The length of
`poly(A) tails were estimated to be ~200-nt long and is indicated with An. Purification of the
`transcripts were performed by Turbo DNase (Ambion, Austin, TX) digestion followed by LiCl
`precipitation and 75% ethanol wash. The concentrations of RNA reconstituted in water were
`determined by measuring the optical density at 260 nm. Efficient incorporation of modified
`nucleotides to the transcripts was demonstrated by HPLC analyses.9 All RNA samples were
`analyzed by denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis for quality assurance. Each RNA type was
`synthesized in 4–10 independently performed transcription experiments and all experiments
`were performed with at least two different batches of mRNA. Schematic representations of all
`mRNAs used in the study are shown in Supplementary Figure S2.
`
`In vitro translation assay
`Aliquots (9 (cid:541)l) of rabbit reticulocyte lysates, wheat germ extracts, or Escherichia coli S30
`extracts (Promega, Madison, WI) were programmed with 1-(cid:541)l (0.5 (cid:541)g) TEVlucA50 or capRen
`mRNAs and incubated for 60 minutes at 30, 25, or 37 °C, respectively. Using cell culture lysis
`reagent (Promega, Madison, WI), the translation was stopped and aliquots were analyzed for
`enzyme activities using firefly and Renilla luciferase assay systems (Promega, Madison, WI)
`and a LUMAT LB 950 luminometer (Berthold/EG&G; Wallac, Gaithersburg, MD) at 10-
`second measuring time. Using recombinant firefly luciferase (Promega, Madison, WI), a
`standard curve was determined to be linear up to 3.6 × 107 relative light units measured activity,
`corresponding to 1.57-ng enzyme. All measurements were performed in the linear range of the
`standard curve. In selected experiments, the capRen-programmed rabbit reticulocyte lysates
`were also supplemented with 35S-methionine (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). At the end of
`incubation, 1-(cid:541)l aliquots were removed to analyze the labeled Renilla luciferase by 15%
`polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The gel containing the labeled samples was treated with
`
`Mol Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 November 10.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`CUREVAC EX2033
`Page 7
`
`

`

`Karikó et al.
`
`Cells
`
`1 mol/l Na salicylate, dried, and a fluorogram was generated by exposure to BioMax MS film
`(Kodak, Rochester, NY).
`
`Page 8
`
`Human embryonic kidney 293 cells and dihydrofolate reductase((cid:237)/(cid:237)) CHO cells were obtained
`from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Splenocytes were isolated from
`mouse (C57Bl/6) spleens using a cell strainer (70 (cid:541)m; BD Discovery Labware, Bedford, MA)
`and ACK lysis buffer (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Embryonic fibroblasts from wild-type and RIG-
`I((cid:237)/(cid:237)) mice,24 293 cells, and splenocytes were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
`medium (DMEM) supplemented with glutamine (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) and
`10% fetal calf serum (HyClone, Logan, UT). CHO cells were cultured in Iscove's modified
`Dulbecco's medium supplemented with hypoxanthine (0.1 mmol/l), thymidine (0.016 mmol/
`l), and 10% fetal calf serum. Murine DCs were generated from bone marrow cells of femurs
`and tibia of 6- to 9-week-old BALB/c mice as described.25 The cells were cultured in RPMI
`(Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) containing glutamine, 10% fetal calf serum, and 50
`ng/ml muGM-CSF (R&D, Minneapolis, MN). Cells were maintained with fresh medium
`containing 50 ng/ml muGM-CSF every 2 days and used on day 7. Primary cortical culture was
`prepared from brain neocortices of E19 rat embryos as previously described,26 cultured in
`DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (HyClone), 10% Ham's F12 with glutamine
`(Whittaker Bioproducts, Walkersville, MD), and 50 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma, St.
`Louis, MO).
`
`Assembling the RNA complex
`Lipofectin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and mRNA were complexed in phosphate buffer that
`has been shown to enhance transfection in vitro and in vivo.27,28 To assemble a 50-(cid:541)l complex
`of RNA-lipofectin, first 0.4 (cid:541)l potassium phosphate buffer (0.4 mol/l, pH 6.2) containing 10
`(cid:541)g/(cid:541)l bovine serum albumin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was added to 6.7 (cid:541)l DMEM, then 0.8 (cid:541)l
`lipofectin was mixed in and the sample was incubated for 10 minutes. In a separate tube, 0.25–
`3.0 (cid:541)g of RNA was added to DMEM to a final volume of 3.3 (cid:541)l. Diluted RNA was added to
`the lipofectin mix and incubated for 10 minutes. Finally, the RNA-lipofectin complex was
`further diluted by adding 38.8 (cid:541)l DMEM. Fifty microliter of such a complex was used to
`transfect cells present in 1 well of a 96-well plate. RNA was complexed with PEI (jetPEI;
`Polyplus Transfection, Illkirch, France) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells
`were exposed to 50 (cid:541)l NaCl (150 mmol/l) containing 0.25 (cid

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket