throbber
J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 47 (2001) 5–19
`
`www.elsevier.com/locate/ jbbm
`
`Mutation detection by capillary denaturing
`high-performance liquid chromatography using
`monolithic columns
`
`*
`a
`b
`Christian G. Huber
`, Andreas Premstaller , Wen Xiao ,
`a
`a
`b

`Herbert Oberacher , Gunther K. Bonn , Peter J. Oefner
`
`a ,
`
`aInstitute of Analytical Chemistry and Radiochemistry, Leopold-Franzens University, A-6020 Innsbruck,
`Austria
`bGenome Technology Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304,USA
`
`Received 29 June 2000; accepted 10 July 2000
`
`Abstract
`
`The high resolving power of the chromatographic separation of single- and double-stranded
`nucleic acids in 200 mm i.d. monolithic poly(styrene–divinylbenzene) capillary columns was
`utilized for mutation screening in polymerase chain reaction amplified polymorphic loci.
`Recognition of mutations is based on the separation of homo- and heteroduplex species by ion-pair
`reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (IP-RP-HPLC) under partially denaturing
`conditions, resulting in characteristic peak patterns both for homozygous and heterozygous
`samples. Six different single nucleotide substitutions and combinations thereof were confidently
`identified in 413 bp amplicons from six heterozygous individuals each of which yielded a different
`unique chromatographic profile. Alternatively, mutations were identified in short, 62 bp PCR
`products upon their complete on-line denaturation at 758C taking advantage of the ability of
`IP-RP-HPLC to resolve single-stranded nucleic acids of identical length that differ in a single
`nucleotide. Separations in monolithic capillary columns can be readily hyphenated to electrospray
`ionization mass spectrometry and promise increased sample throughput by operating in arrays
`similar to those already used in capillary electrophoresis.
`2001 Published by Elsevier Science
`B.V.
`
`Keywords: Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography; Monoliths; Mutation detection
`


`*Corresponding author. Institut fur Analytische Chemie und Radiochemie, Leopold-Franzens-Universitat,
`Innrain 52a, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Tel.: 143-512-507-5176; fax: 143-512-507-2767.
`E-mail address: christian.huber@uibk.ac.at (C.G. Huber).
`
`0165-022X/ 01/ $ – see front matter
`PII: S0165-022X( 00 ) 00147-0
`
`2001 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
`
`1
`
`MTX1046
`
`(cid:211)
`(cid:211)
`

`

`6
`
`C.G. Huber et al. / J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 47(2001)5–19
`
`1. Introduction
`
`With the whole sequence of the human genome available in the year 2000, the
`detection of mutations and polymorphisms is becoming increasingly important in the
`fields of genetics, molecular diagnostics, and cancer research. Methods used for the
`detection of unknown mutations include single-strand conformation polymorphism
`analysis [1], denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis [2],
`temperature gradient gel
`electrophoresis [3], mismatch cleavage methods [4,5], direct sequencing [6], oligo-
`nucleotide arrays [7], as well as gel electrophoresis [8] and high-performance liquid
`chromatography-based [9] heteroduplex detection.
`Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) has shown great
`potential in detecting efficiently and sensitively single-base substitutions as well as small
`deletions and insertions in DNA fragments ranging from 100 to 1500 base pairs in size
`[10,11]. Partially denaturing HPLC is based on the separation of homo- from heterodup-
`lex species generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of polymorphic
`loci containing one or more mismatches by ion-pair reversed-phase HPLC (IP-RP-
`HPLC) at elevated column temperatures in the range 48–678C [12]. Recently, it has
`been demonstrated that the high resolving power of IP-RP-HPLC in combination with
`the sequence dependence of the retention of single-stranded nucleic acids enables the
`detection of mutations in short PCR products ( , 100 bp) under completely denaturing
`conditions [13].
`However, despite its high sensitivity and productivity, further improvements in
`DHPLC technology are necessary to achieve higher throughput, information content,
`cost-effectiveness, and reliability of the method required for routine mutation screening.
`One attractive means to enhance sample throughput
`is the miniaturization of the
`separation channel by using capillary columns of 50–320 mm inner diameter [14]. Such
`capillaries can then be bundled into arrays similar to those used in capillary electro-
`phoresis [15]. In addition, the low flow rates applied in capillary HPLC are highly suited
`for on-line hyphenation with mass spectrometry [16,17].
`Due to their excellent chemical and physical stability, micropellicular, alkylated
`poly(styrene–divinylbenzene) (PS/DVB-C18) beads of 2–3 mm diameter packed into
`columns of 50 3 4.6 mm i.d. have become the premier column packing material for
`separating single- and double-stranded nucleic acids with high resolution [18,19]. Novel
`frit designs have enabled the reduction of the inner column diameter to 200 mm and
`allowed the analysis of femtomole amounts of DNA by capillary IP-RP-HPLC [20].
`Subsequently, the in situ synthesis of a continuous, rod-shaped, porous copolymer of
`styrene and divinylbenzene inside a 200 mm i.d. fused-silica capillary eliminates the
`need for tedious frit preparation due to the covalent attachment of the polymer to the
`inner surface of the capillary [17,21]. In addition, such monolithic PS/DVB capillary
`columns have been found to provide up to 40% improved separation efficiency over
`packed column beds.
`In this communication, we report on the applicability of monolithic poly(styrene–
`divinylbenzene) (PS/DVB) capillary columns to the detection of single nucleotide
`polymorphisms (SNPs) in genomic DNA under both partial and complete thermal
`denaturation of PCR products. The chromatographic performance of the monolithic
`
`2
`
`

`

`C.G. Huber et al. / J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 47(2001)5–19
`
`7
`
`columns is critically evaluated and compared with the performance of conventional
`state-of-the-art 4.6 mm i.d. columns packed with 2 mm micropellicular PS/ DVB-C18
`particles.
`
`2. Materials and methods
`
`2.1. Sequences and reagents
`
`The following three sequences, with priming regions typed in lower case and positions
`and chemical nature of polymorphic sites indicated in parentheses, were investigated:
`
`Sequence 1, 209 bp, aggcactggtcagaatgaagTGAATGGCACACAGGACAAGTCC
`AGA CCCA GGAAGGTCCAGT AAC ATGGGAG AA GAACGG AAGGAGTTCTAAA
`ATT CAGGGCT CCCTT GGGCTCCCCTGT TTAAAAATGTAGGTTTTATTATTATA
`TTT CATT GTT AACAAAAGTCC (A / G) TGAGA TCTG TGGAGGATAAAGggggagct
`gtattttccatt
`
`Sequence 2, 413 bp, gggggtataagtataaacaaaacTGACCCCATCGCTGCCCTCTTG
`GAGCTGAG AGT CTC ATAAA CAGCT TTAA GGTAATAAAATCATTTT(C / A)TGT
`GCCACAGGAT (G / A) TGAGTTGGTTT GATGACCCTAAAAACACCACTGGAGCA
`TTGACT ACCAGGCT CGCCAATGATGCTG CTCA AGTTAA AGGGGTACGTGCC
`TCCTTTCTACTGGT(G / A)TTTGTCTTAATTGGC(C / T)ATTTTGGACCCCAGCAT
`GAAAC TAATTTTCTC(C / A)TTA(C / T)GGGTGTT AGTTATCATCATTAAGAAAA
`TGTT GAATAAATATCT AACCTACGAATATA TCACATGCTTTTTGTAGCAACAT
`GTT AACTATTT AAACAT TATATACT GTAGAGCATATAGATA ACTTATAAAccat
`ttgctattgctgttatt
`
`Sequence 3, 62 bp, cccaaacccattttgatgctT(G/T)ACTTAAaaggtcttcaattattattttcttaaat
`
`attttg
`
`All oligonucleotide primers were obtained from Life Technologies (Rockville, MD,
`USA). The oligonucleotide sizing marker containing 8–32-mers of
`the sequence
`d(GACT)
`and d(GACT) GT was obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech
`n
`n
`(Uppsala, Sweden). MspI and HaeIII digests of pBR322 and pUC18, respectively, were
`obtained from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA, USA) and Sigma (St. Louis, MO,
`USA). A stock solution of triethylammonium acetate (TEAA), pH 7.0, was obtained
`from PE Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA) or prepared by dissolving equimolar
`amounts of triethylamine (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) and glacial acetic aced (Fluka) in
`water. HPLC-grade acetonitrile was purchased from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA)
`
`3
`
`

`

`8
`
`C.G. Huber et al. / J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 47(2001)5–19
`
`or Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). High-purity water (E-pure, Barnstead Co., Newton,
`MA, USA) was used for preparing the mobile phase.
`
`2.2. Polymerase chain reaction
`
`Polymerase chain reactions were performed in a 50 ml volume containing 10 mM
`Tris–HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl , 0.1 mM each of the four dNTPs, 0.2
`2
`mM of each primer, 50 ng of genomic DNA, and 1 unit of AmpliTaq Gold (PE
`Biosystems). The PCR cycling regime carried out in a Perkin-Elmer 9600 thermal cycler
`comprised an initial denaturation step at 958C for 10 min to activate AmpliTaq Gold, 14
`cycles of denaturation at 948C for 20 s, primer annealing for 1 min at 63–568C with
`0.58C decrements, and extension at 728C for 1 min, followed by 20 cycles at 948C for 20
`s, 568C for 1 min, and 728C for 1 min. Following a final extension step at 728C for 5
`min, samples were chilled to 68C. Prior to DHPLC under partially denaturing conditions,
`all PCR products were denatured once more at 948C for 3 min and allowed to renature
`over 30 min by decreasing the temperature from 95 to 658C. This ensures the formation
`of equimolar ratios of homo- and heteroduplex species.
`
`2.3. High-performance liquid chromatography
`
`The instumentation for conventional HPLC consisted of an on-line degasser (DG1210,
`Uniflows Co., Tokyo, Japan), two SD-200 high-pressure pumps, an electronic pressure
`module, a 600 ml dynamic mixer, a six-port injection valve mounted into a MISTRAL
`column oven, an automated sample injector (AI-1A), a Dynamax UV-absorbance
`detector set at 254 nm, and a PC-based system controller and data analysis package
`(Varian, Walnut Creek, CA, USA). Preheating of the mobile phase was accomplished in
`an 80 cm 254 mm i.d. PEEK tubing that had been encased in a tin-alloy block
`(Timberline, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA). The stationary phase consisted of 2 mm
`micropellicular, alkylated PS/DVB particles [18] packed into 5034.6 mm i.d. columns,
`which are commercially available (DNASepE, Transgenomic, San Jose, CA, USA). The
`mobile phase was 0.1 M triethylammonium acetate at pH 7.0, containing in addition 0.1
`mM Na EDTA (Sigma). DNA restriction fragments and crude PCR products were
`4
`eluted with linear acetonitrile gradients at a flow rate of 0.9 ml/min.
`The capillary HPLC system consisted of a low-pressure gradient micro pump (LC
`Packings, Amsterdam, Netherlands) controlled by a personal computer, a vacuum
`degasser (Uniflows Co.), a MISTRAL column oven, a six-port valve injector with a 1 ml
`sample loop (Valco Instruments, Houston, TX, USA), a variable wavelength detector
`(UltiMate UV detector, LC Packings) with a Z-shaped capillary detector cell (UZ-ULT-
`NIO, 3-nl cell, LC Packings), and a PC-based data system (UltiChrom, LC Packings).
`Preheating of the mobile phase and consequent partial or complete denaturation of DNA
`fragments was obtained with a 20 cm piece of 25 mm i.d. fused-silica capillary
`positioned in the oven between the injector (mounted outside the oven) and the column.
`Monolithic capillary columns were prepared according to the previously published
`protocol [17].
`
`4
`
`

`

`C.G. Huber et al. / J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 47(2001)5–19
`
`9
`
`3. Results and discussion
`
`3.1. Separation of single-stranded and double-stranded nucleic acids
`
`For the successful downscaling of a chromatographic separation from a conventional
`column of inner diameter 4.6 mm to a miniaturized inner diameter of 0.2 mm, a number
`of instrumental parameters have to be modified and optimized. An HPLC instrument
`capable of performing separations utilizing capillary columns of 50–320 mm i.d. must be
`configured with a low dispersion valve for the injection of typically 20 nl to 5 ml of
`sample. It must be able to reproducibly deliver gradients at low flow rates (100 nl/ min
`to 5 ml /min), and requires a sensitive detector with a low-volume detection cell (1–60
`nl) [22]. Reproducible gradients are conveniently obtained by splitting a relatively high
`primary flow of mobile phase delivered by a conventional gradient pumping system by
`means of a T-piece [23]. Thus, only a small portion of the mobile phase is passed via the
`injector onto the separation column, whereas the main flow of the mobile phase goes to
`waste. Since the primary flow is usually in the range of 100–500 ml/min, a reduction by
`a factor of 2–10 in solvent consumption is usually feasible compared to conventional 4.6
`mm i.d. columns operated at a flow of 1 ml/min. Another important consideration with
`microscale gradient HPLC separations is the so-called gradient delay time, the time
`elapsing between formation of the gradient in the mixing system and entering of the
`gradient into the separation column. The lower the flow rate, the more time is needed to
`flush a given volume between the mixing device and the separation column. Therefore,
`careful attention has to be paid to minimize the volumes of all connecting tubing in the
`HPLC system, especially after the splitting device.
`Fig. 1 illustrates the separation of a ladder of mixed-sequence single-stranded
`oligonucleotides ranging in size from eight to 32 nucleotide units and differing in length
`by two nucleotide units. It can be seen that all oligonucleotides are well separated,
`leaving enough peak capacity for obtaining baseline separation of oligonucleotides with
`single nucleotide resolution over the entire investigated size range. The significant
`influence of base sequence on the retention of single-stranded oligonucleotides has been
`reported previously [13,18,24] and can also be deduced from close examination of the
`retention differences of neighboring pairs of oligonucleotides in Fig. 1. The difference in
`retention times between the 8-mer and the 10-mer is bigger than that observed between
`the 10-mer and the 12-mer. The same alternating smaller and larger retention differences
`were observed with all subsequent peaks, suggesting that the addition of G and T
`contributes more to retention than addition of A and C.
`The slight peak asymmetry which is greater for early eluting peaks indicates an excess
`of extra-column volume. A reduction of the extra-column volume to less than 10% of
`the peak retention volume will require modifications of the existing instrumentation,
`including the positioning of the injection valve and sample loop in the column oven.
`Reduction of connecting volumes in the instrument will also help to reduce the relatively
`large gradient delay time of 6 min in the chromatogram of Fig. 1. Such a modification
`will ensure more rapid and improved resolution of single-stranded oligo- and polynu-
`cleotides with increasing column temperature as reported recently [14]. With the current
`instrumentation the resolution was highest at 608C, where the resolution values ranged
`
`5
`
`

`

`10
`
`C.G. Huber et al. / J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 47(2001)5–19
`
`Fig. 1. Chromatogram of mixed sequence oligonucleotide sizing markers eight to 32 bases in length separated
`in a monolithic capillary column. Column, monolithic PS/ DVB, 5030.2 mm i.d.; mobile phase, (A) 100 mM
`TEAA, 0.1 mM Na EDTA, pH 7.0, (B) 100 mM TEAA, 0.1 mM Na EDTA, pH 7.0, 25% acetonitrile; linear
`4
`4
`gradient, 0–5% B in 1.0 min, 5–15% B in 2.0 min, 15–25% B in 8.0 min, 25–30% B in 4 min; flow rate, 3.0
`ml/ min; temperature, 608C; detection, UV, 254 nm; injection volume, 150 nl; sample, 8–32-mer oligonucleo-
`tides, 0.5–1.7 ng/ ml each.
`
`from 7.09 between the 8-mer and the 10-mer to 2.69 between the 30-mer and the
`32-mer.
`The most significant advantage of capillary HPLC is the better signal height-to-sample
`mass ratio, as the peak concentration is proportional to the inverse square of the column
`diameter [25]. This means that the same amount of analyte will give, in theory, a signal
`that is approximately 500 times higher with a 0.2 mm than with a 4.6 mm column. In
`reality, this translates into significantly smaller injection volumes of the order of a few
`hundred nanoliters with the detection limit being as low as 3 fmol for an 18-mer
`oligonucleotide using UV absorbance at 254 nm. This is almost as sensitive as
`fluorescence detection of fluorescent dye-labeled nucleic acids using a 4.6 mm column,
`with lower limits of detection ranging from 0.5 to 3 fmol depending on the attached
`fluorophore [26]. Hence, while the savings in HPLC solvent may only be on the order of
`a factor of 2–10, far more significant savings can be accomplished in PCR reagent
`consumption as amplifications can be carried out in volumes as small as 0.5–1 ml.
`Fig. 2 shows the separation of 30 double-stranded DNA restriction fragments using
`both a 5030.2 mm i.d. monolithic capillary column and a conventional, microparticulate
`5034.6 mm i.d. packed column. As discussed above, the longer time required for
`
`6
`
`

`

`C.G. Huber et al. / J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 47(2001)5–19
`
`11
`
`Fig. 2. Comparison of high-resolution IP-RP-HPLC of double-stranded DNA fragments obtained from HaeIII
`and MspI digests of pUC18 and pBR322, respectively, using either a conventional microparticulate 4.6 mm i.d.
`packed column or a 0.2 mm i.d. monolithic capillary column. Conditions in (a): column, 2 mm PS/ DVB-C18
`particles (DNASepE, Transgenomic), 5034.6 mm i.d.; mobile phase, (A) 100 mM TEAA, 0.1 mM
`Na EDTA, pH 7.0, (B) 100 mM TEAA, 0.1 mM Na EDTA, pH 7.0, 25% acetonitrile; linear gradient,
`4
`4
`38–56% B in 4.0 min, 56–67% B in 6.0 min; flow rate, 0.90 ml/min; temperature, 508C; injection volume, 8
`ml. Conditions in (b): column, monolithic PS /DVB, 5030.2 mm; mobile phase, (A) 100 mM TEAA, 0.1 mM
`Na EDTA, pH 7.0, (B) 100 mM TEAA, 0.1 mM Na EDTA, pH 7.0, 25% acetonitrile; linear gradient,
`4
`4
`30–50% B in 4.0 min, 50–65% B in 13.0 min; flow rate, 3.0 ml /min; temperature, 49.78C; detection, UV, 254
`nm; injection volume, 1 ml.
`
`7
`
`

`

`12
`
`C.G. Huber et al. / J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 47(2001)5–19
`
`separation with the monolithic column is a consequence of the greater gradient delay
`time with the capillary HPLC instrument. Nevertheless, the separation efficiency of both
`columns is equivalent, allowing the separation of DNA fragments that differ by less than
`5% in size. The resolution obtained with monolithic capillaries may be further improved
`by reducing the dead volumes in the chromatographic system. A close inspection of the
`chromatograms reveals partial resolution of the two 160 bp fragments, whereas the 174
`and 180 bp fragments are hardly resolved. As demonstrated previously [27], such
`anomalies are a consequence of differences in base composition with very AT-rich
`fragments undergoing partial denaturation already at 508C, which results in their reduced
`retention. Such reductions in retention are also observed in the presence of mismatches
`that disrupt the DNA helix. This constitutes the basis for the successful detection of
`single-base substitutions and small insertions and deletions by denaturing high-per-
`formance liquid chromatography [9].
`A comparison of the gradient profiles applied in Fig. 2 reveals that a lower
`concentration of acetonitrile is required to elute the DNA restriction fragments from the
`monolithic column. Taking into consideration a gradient delay time of 0.7 min with the
`conventional HPLC instrument, the DNA fragments elute at acetonitrile concentrations
`between 11.5 and 16.3% (Fig. 2a). On the other hand, with a gradient delay time of 6
`min in the capillary HPLC instrument, the fragments elute between 10.0 and 14.7%
`acetonitrile (Fig. 2b). This is due to the lower degree of non-polarity of the monolithic
`PS/DVB stationary phase, which is not alkylated, in contrast to the PS/DVB particles,
`which are derivatized with highly non-polar octadecyl groups [18].
`
`3.2. Partially denaturing HPLC for mutation detection
`
`Partially denaturing HPLC exploits the reduced retention of heteroduplex molecules
`containing one or more mismatches at elevated column temperatures compared to a
`corresponding perfectly matched homoduplex. The reliability of DHPLC in detecting
`single nucleotide substitutions as well as short deletions and insertions is due to the fact
`that most mismatches can be detected over a temperature range of several degrees [10].
`This is exemplified in Fig. 3, which shows the successful detection of an A to G
`transition in a 209 bp amplicon between 55.8 and 59.88C. The presence of a mismatch is
`generally recognized by the appearance of one or more additional peaks. The number of
`peaks detected is a function of the nature and the number of mismatches as well as the
`column temperature.
`As shown in Fig. 3, at a temperature of 57.88C all four species of hetero- and
`homoduplices can be separated. The order of elution of the four species is dictated by
`the degree of destabilization of the DNA helix, which is influenced by both neighboring
`stacking interactions [28] and the ability of certain bases to form atypical Watson–Crick
`base pairs [29]. The thermal stabilities of typical Watson–Crick and mismatched base
`pairs as a function of the flanking base pairs in otherwise homologous 373 bp DNA
`fragments have been determined previously by temperature-gradient gel electrophoresis
`[28]. According to the ranking of stabilities provided in that study, one would expect the
`homoduplex with the AT-base pair to be retained less than that with the GC-base pair.
`And indeed, separate injection of the two homoduplices as well as a mixture of the two
`
`8
`
`

`

`C.G. Huber et al. / J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 47(2001)5–19
`
`13
`
`Fig. 3. Resolution of 209 bp homo- and heteroduplex DNA fragments containing a single Afi G transition
`under partially denaturing conditions. Column, PS /DVB monolith, 5030.20 mm i.d.; mobile phase, (A) 100
`mM TEAA, 0.1 mM Na EDTA, pH 7.0, (B) 100 mM TEAA, 0.1 mM Na EDTA, pH 7.0, 25% acetonitrile;
`4
`4
`linear gradient, 30–50% B in 3.0 min, 50–70% B in 7.0 min; flow rate, 3.0 ml /min; temperature, 54.7–59.88C;
`detection, UV, 254 nm; injection volume, 500 nl; sample, sequence 1.
`
`that had not been denatured and reannealed confirmed the expected elution order. With
`regard to the two heteroduplices, the GT heteroduplex should be retained longer because
`the flanking base pairs have been determined to stabilize this mismatch more than the
`AC mismatch. In addition, two hydrogen bonds can form between G and T, and this
`atypical Watson–Crick base pair stacks within a DNA B-conformation duplex with
`relatively little distortion, as indicated by NMR and X-ray crystallographic studies [1].
`As shown in Fig. 4, different mismatches or combinations of mismatches (Table 1)
`tend to generate different chromatographic profiles. Consequently, sequence analysis,
`which is still required to determine the exact location and nature of mismatches, can be
`limited to a few representative profiles. However,
`identical profiles for different
`mutations located within the same melting domain but not at the same nucleotide
`position have been reported [30]. The chromatographic profiles obtained with a
`monolithic 0.2 mm i.d. capillary column (Fig. 4) are very similar to those observed with
`a 4.6 mm i.d. microparticulate column (Fig. 5), although a 28C higher column
`temperature was required. Since the residence times in the preheating loops between
`injector and column with both the conventional and capillary HPLC instrument are
`
`9
`
`

`

`14
`
`C.G. Huber et al. / J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 47(2001)5–19
`
`Fig. 4. Influence of the nucleotide position, the number of mismatches, and column temperature on the
`chromatographic separation profiles obtained for one homozygous control and six heterozygotes under partially
`denaturing conditions using a monolithic 200 mm i.d. capillary column. Column, monolithic PS /DVB, 6030.2
`mm i.d.; mobile phase, (A) 100 mM TEAA, 0.1 mM Na EDTA, pH 7.0, (B) 100 mM TEAA, 0.1 mM
`4
`Na EDTA, pH 7.0, 25% acetonitrile; linear gradient, 43–50% B in 0.5 min, 50–54% B in 3.5 min; flow rate, 3
`4
`ml/ min; temperature, 61 and 578C; injection volume, 500 nl; sample, sequence 2. See Table 1 for the nature
`and location of mismatches underlying the chromatographic profiles.
`
`practically identical (2.7 versus 2.5 s), the difference in temperature is due to the more
`polar character of the monolith surface. Thus, lower concentrations of acetonitrile are
`required for the elution of the amplicons, which in turn results in higher stability of the
`double helical structure at a given temperature. All heterozygote profiles except one are
`clearly recognized as such. The only exception is Aus23, which displays only a trailing
`shoulder indicating that
`the melting domain in which the mutation is located has
`undergone almost complete denaturation both in the heteroduplex as well as in the
`homoduplex species. This was confirmed by re-running the sample at a column
`temperature 48C lower, where a clean heteroduplex profile is observed.
`
`3.3. Completely denaturing HPLC for mutation detection
`
`It has been noticed that DNA fragments shorter than approximately 150 bp are too
`unstable to allow the detection of mutations by partially denaturing HPLC. This
`limitation can be overcome by the complete on-line denaturation of short amplicons into
`
`10
`
`

`

`C.G. Huber et al. / J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 47(2001)5–19
`
`15
`
`Table 1
`Position and nature of mismatches contained in 413 bp amplicons of six heterozygous individuals and a
`homozygous control. The sequence included exon 20 and flanking non-coding regions of the human
`P-glycoprotein (MDR1, Genbank Acc. No. M14758)
`
`Individual
`
`a
`
`Positions of mutations from 59-end of forward primer
`(positions within the MDR1 sequence)
`
`b
`
`91
`(2398211)
`
`105
`(2401)
`
`209
`(2481124)
`
`225
`(2481140)
`
`258
`(2481173)
`
`262
`(2481177)
`
`P218
`P100G
`SD18
`GM2064A
`P111G
`OM135
`Aus23
`
`C
`C
`C/A
`C
`C
`C
`C
`
`G
`G
`G
`G
`G
`G/A
`G
`
`G
`G/A
`G
`G/A
`G
`G
`G
`
`C
`C
`C
`C/T
`C/T
`C
`C
`
`C
`C
`C
`C/A
`C/A
`C
`C
`
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C
`C/T
`
`a Individuals are from the Stanford human diversity panel.
`b Sequence 2, see Materials and methods.
`
`their single-stranded components which are then resolved on the basis of their sequence
`composition rather than their size [13]. Since differences in base composition as small as
`a single base out of 100 bases suffice to separate two single-stranded nucleic acids of
`identical size, the alleles of a given polymorphic locus can be resolved without the
`addition of a reference chromosome. The only exceptions to this rule have been C to G
`transversions [13]. Fig. 6 shows an example of allelic discrimination based on the
`separation of the single-stranded components of a 62 bp PCR product containing a single
`G to T transversion by means of DHPLC on a monolithic capillary column under
`completely denaturing conditions. The chromatograms in Fig. 6a and b illustrate two
`homozygous samples, where the two completely denatured single strands of the same
`chain length are completely separated by IP-RP-HPLC. In the case of a heterozygote
`sample, three peaks are observed corresponding to two coeluting and two separated
`single strands (Fig. 6c). As mentioned above, the single base change affects the retention
`of the single-stranded components sufficiently to allow the discrimination of mutated
`from wild-type DNA in at least one pair of corresponding DNA strands. Moreover, the
`separation on the monolithic column is very similar to that reported recently for this
`polymorphic locus on a microparticulate 4.6 mm i.d. column (compare Fig. 6f in Ref.
`[13]).
`One distinct advantage of capillary IP-RP-HPLC is the feasibility of coupling this
`separation system on-line to mass spectrometry. This will allow positive confirmation of
`the identity of the resolved single-stranded components and the unambiguous genotyping
`of the amplified PCR fragments. One very crucial step in mass spectrometric analysis of
`nucleic acids is the proper desalting and removal of low-molecular-weight impurities in
`the samples in order to obtain mass spectra of good quality [31]. The on-line purification
`of nucleic acids by HPLC prior to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS)
`is very attractive because it not only removes cations from nucleic acid samples, but it
`also allows fractionation of nucleic acid mixtures that are otherwise too complex for
`direct infusion ESI-MS. Moreover, the identification even of heterozygous alleles eluting
`
`11
`
`

`

`16
`
`C.G. Huber et al. / J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 47(2001)5–19
`
`Fig. 5. Influence of the nucleotide position, the number of mismatches, and column temperature on the
`chromatographic separation profiles obtained for one homozygous control and six heterozygotes under partially
`denaturing conditions using a conventional microparticulate 4.6 mm i.d. column. Column, 5034.6 mm i.d.
`stainless steel column packed with 2 mm PS /DVB-C18 particles (DNASepE, Transgenomic); mobile phase,
`(A) 100 mM TEAA, 0.1 mM Na EDTA, pH 7.0, (B) 100 mM TEAA, 0.1 mM Na EDTA, pH 7.0, 25%
`4
`4
`acetonitrile; linear gradient, 50–52% B in 0.5 min, 52–59% B in 3.5 min; flow rate, 0.9 ml/min; column
`temperature, 59 and 558C; injection volume, 9 ml; sample, sequence 2. See Table 1 for the nature and location
`of mismatches underlying the chromatographic profiles.
`
`as one single chromatographic peak should become feasible because ESI-MS can
`directly analyze and deconvolute simple mixtures of nucleic acids [32].
`The mobile phase components usually applied in IP-RP-HPLC, namely water,
`acetonitrile, triethylamine, and acetic acid, are volatile, and, therefore, suitable for direct
`interfacing with ESI-MS. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the solvent com-
`position has a tremendous effect on the mass spectrometric detectability of nucleic acids
`[16,33]. A reduction in the eluent conductivity through a decrease in ion-pair reagent
`concentration from 100 to 25 mM, and the exchange of acetic acid with carbonic acid
`resulted in considerable gains in mass spectrometric signal intensities at the cost of only
`a small decrease in chromatographic separation efficiency. Additionally, an increase in
`the proportion of organic solvent
`in the electrosprayed solution upon post-column
`addition of acetonitrile as sheath liquid through the triaxial electrospray probe was found
`to greatly enhance the detectability of nucleic acids in ESI-MS. Under such optimized
`conditions, purification, separation, detection, and mass characterization of low fem-
`
`12
`
`

`

`C.G. Huber et al. / J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 47(2001)5–19
`
`17
`
`Fig. 6. Direct allelic discrimination of two alleles based on their different retention under completely
`denaturing conditions using a monolithic capillary column. Column, monolithic PS /DVB, 5030.2 mm i.d.;
`mobile phase, (A) 100 mM TEAA, pH 7.0, (B) 100 mM TEAA, pH 7.0, 20% acetonitrile; linear gradient,
`36–48% B in 10.0 min; flow rate, 3.0 ml /min; temperature, 758C; detection, UV, 254 nm; injection volume,
`500 nl; sample, sequence 3, (a) homozygous G, (b) homozygous T, (c) heterozygous G/T.
`
`13
`
`

`

`18
`
`C.G. Huber et al. / J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 47(2001)5–19
`
`tomole amounts of nucleic acids in real matrices such as PCR reactions can be realized
`in a time frame of a few minutes.
`
`4. Conclusions
`
`It has been demonstrated that monolithic 200 mm i.d. columns are highly suited for
`the detection of mutations by capillary denaturing high-performance liquid chromatog-
`raphy. Miniaturization of the separation channel did not affect the resolving power of the
`system. Moreover, it allowed a reduction in solvent consumption by a factor of 3 and
`reduced the amount of sample required for analysis to a few hundred nanoliters. Future
`developments utilizing the developed miniaturized column technology will certainly
`include the bundling of capillaries into arrays coupled with multi-color fluorescence
`detection and hyphenation of the separation system with mass spectrometry, which will
`significantly improve the productivity of DHPLC for high-throughput mass screening for
`known and unknown mutations.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`This study was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (P-14133-PHY) and NIH
`grant HG01932.
`
`References
`
`[1] Orita M, Iwahana H, Kanazawa H, Hayashi K, Sekiya T. Detection of polymorphisms of human DNA by
`gel
`electrophoresis
`as
`single-strand confirmation polymorphisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
`1989;86:2766–70.
`[2] Myers RM, Lumelsky N, Lerman LS, Maniatis T. Detection of single base substitutions in total genomic
`DNA. Nature 1985;313:495–8.
`[3] Tee MK, Moran C, Nicholas FW. Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis: detection of a single base
`substitution in the cattle beta-lactoglobulin gene. Anim Genet 1992;23:431–5.
`[4] Gibbs RA, Caskey CT. Identification and localization of mutations at
`the Lesch-Nyhan locus by
`ribonuclease A cleavage. Science 1987;236:303–5.
`[5] Cotton RG, Rodrigues NR, Campbell RD. Reactivity of cytosine and thymine in single-base-pair
`mismatches with hydroxylamine and osmium tetroxide and its application to the study of mutations. Proc
`Natl Acad Sci USA 1988;85:4397–401.
`[6] Rosenthal A, Charmock JDS. New protocols for DNA sequencing with dye

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket