throbber
Anal.Chem. 2000, 72, 4386-4393
`
`High-Performance Liquid
`Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization Mass
`Spectrometry of Single- and Double-Stranded
`Nucleic Acids Using Monolithic Capillary Columns
`
`Andreas Premstaller, Herbert Oberacher, and Christian G. Huber*
`
`InstituteofAnalyticalChemistryandRadiochemistry,Leopold-Franzens-University,Innrain52a,A-6020Innsbruck,Austria
`
`Monolithic capillary columns were prepared by copolym-
`erization of styrene and divinylbenzene inside a 200-(cid:237)m
`i.d. fused silica capillary using a mixture of tetrahydro-
`furan and decanol as porogen. With gradients of acetoni-
`trile in 100 mM triethylammonium acetate, the synthe-
`sized columns allowed the rapid and highly efficient
`separation of single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides and
`double-stranded DNA fragments by ion-pair reversed-
`phase high-performance liquid chromatography (IP-RP-
`HPLC). Compared with capillary columns packed with
`micropellicular, octadecylated poly-(styrene/divinylben-
`zene) particles, an improvement in column performance
`of approximately 40% was obtained, enabling the analysis
`of an 18-mer oligodeoxynucleotide with a column ef-
`ficiency of more than 190 000 plates per meter. The
`chromatographic separation system was on-line-coupled
`to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS).
`To improve the mass spectrometric detectabilities, 25 mM
`triethylammonium bicarbonate was utilized as an ion-pair
`reagent at the cost of only little reduction in separation
`performance and acetonitrile was added postcolumn as
`the sheath liquid through the triaxial electrospray probe.
`High-quality mass spectra of femtomole amounts of 3-mer
`to 80-mer oligodeoxynucleotides were recorded showing
`very little cation adduction. Double-stranded DNA frag-
`ments ranging in size from 51 to 587 base pairs were
`separated and detected by IP-RP-HPLC-ESI-MS. Accurate
`mass determination by deconvolution of the mass spectra
`was feasible for DNA fragments up to the 267-mer with a
`molecular mass of 165 019, whereas the spectra of longer
`fragments were too complex for deconvolution because
`of incomplete separation due to overloading of the col-
`umn. Finally, on-line IP-RP-HPLC tandem MS was ap-
`plied to the sequencing of short oligodeoxynucleotides.
`
`For more than 30 years, columns packed with microparticulate
`sorbents have been successfully applied as separation media in
`high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).1 Despite many
`advantages, HPLC columns packed with microparticulate, porous
`
`* Corresponding author. Tel.: +43 512 507 5176. Fax: +43 512 507 2767.
`E-mail: Christian.Huber@uibk.ac.at
`(1) Majors, R. E. Supplement to LC GC 1998, 7-21.
`
`4386 AnalyticalChemistry,Vol.72,No.18,September15,2000
`
`stationary phases have some limitations, such as the relatively
`large void volume between the packed particles and the slow
`diffusional mass transfer of solutes into and out of the stagnant
`mobile phase present in the pores of the separation medium.2,3
`One approach to alleviate the problem of restricted mass transfer
`and intraparticular void volume is the concept of monolithic
`chromatographic beds, where the separation medium consists of
`a continuous rod of a rigid, porous polymer which has no
`interstitial volume but only internal porosity consisting of mi-
`cropores and macropores.4-8 Because of the absence of intrapar-
`ticular volume, all of the mobile phase is forced to flow through
`the pores of the separation medium.9 According to theory, mass
`transport is enhanced by such convection10,11 and has a positive
`effect on chromatographic efficiency.12 Monolithic chromato-
`graphic beds are usually prepared by polymerization of suitable
`monomers and porogens in a stainless steel or fused silica tube
`which acts as a mold.6,13,14 The porous structure is achieved as a
`result of the phase separation which occurs during the polymer-
`ization of a monomer or monomer mixture containing appropriate
`amounts of both a cross-linking monomer and a porogenic solvent
`or a mixture of porogenic solvents.15,16
`Miniaturized chromatographic separation systems applying
`capillary columns of 10-500-(cid:237)m inner diameter are frequently the
`method of choice for the separation and characterization of
`biopolymer mixtures, when the amount of available sample is
`limited. The concept of monolithic stationary phases is especially
`
`(2) Martin, A. J.; Synge, R. L. M. Biochem. J. 1941, 35, 1358.
`(3) Unger, K. K. In Packings and Stationary Phases in Chromatographic
`Techniques; Unger, K. K., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1990; p 75.
`(4) Hansen, L. C.; Sievers, R. E. J. Chromatogr. 1974, 99, 123-133.
`(5) Hjerte´n, S.; Liao, J.-L.; Zhang, R. J. Chromatogr. 1989, 473, 273-275.
`(6) Svec, F.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Anal. Chem. 1992, 64, 820-822.
`(7) Minakuchi, H.; Nakanishi, K.; Soga, N.; Ishizuka, N.; Tanaka, N. Anal. Chem.
`1996, 68, 3498-3501.
`(8) Gusev, I.; Huang, X.; Horva´th, C. J. Chromatogr., A 1999, 855, 273-290.
`(9) Petro, M.; Svec, F.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. J. Chromatogr., A 1996, 752, 59-66.
`(10) Liapis, A. I.; McCoy, M. A. J. Chromatogr., A 1994, 660, 85.
`(11) Rodrigues, A. E.; Lu, Z. P.; Loureiro, J. M.; Carta, G. J. Chromatogr. 1993,
`653, 189.
`(12) Afeyan, N. B.; Gordon, N. F.; Mazsaroff, I.; Varady, L.; Fulton, S. P.; Yang,
`Y. B.; Regnier, F. E. J. Chromatogr. 1990, 519, 1-29.
`(13) Hjerte´n, S.; Li, Y. M.; Liao, J. L.; Mohammad, J.; Nakazato, K.; Pettersson,
`G. Nature (London) 1992, 356, 810-811.
`(14) Viklund, C.; Svec, F.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 744-750.
`(15) Seidl, J.; Malinsky, J.; Dusek, K.; Heitz, W. Adv. Polym. Sci. 1967, 5, 113-
`213.
`(16) Svec, F.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 7580-7582.
`
`10.1021/ac000283d CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
`Published on Web 08/18/2000
`
`1
`
`MTX1045
`
`

`

`favorable for the fabrication of capillary columns, because the
`immobilization of the monolith at the capillary wall eliminates the
`necessity of preparing a tiny retaining frit,17 which is one of the
`more tedious and difficult-to-control steps during the manufacture
`of packed-bed capillary columns.18 Moreover, the possibility of
`direct on-line conjugation of capillary HPLC to mass spectrometry
`makes available highly valuable information about the structure
`and identity of the separated compounds.19 Electrospray ionization
`mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), by virtue of the multiple charging
`of biopolymers and the very soft ionization process, has become
`one of the most important mass spectrometric techniques for the
`analysis of nucleic acids.20 Nevertheless, the success of ESI-MS
`for the characterization of nucleic acids largely depends on the
`purity of the sample that is introduced into the mass spectrom-
`eter.21 The major difficulties arise due to the tendency of nucleic
`acids to form quite stable adducts with cations, resulting in mass
`spectra of poor quality.22,23 The on-line sample preparation of
`nucleic acids by chromatographic separation prior to ESI-MS is
`very attractive because it not only removes cations from nucleic
`acid samples but also fractionates nucleic acids in mixtures that
`are too complex for direct-infusion ESI-MS.
`Although continuous-bed columns have proved to be efficient
`for the separation of biopolymers such as peptides24,25 and
`proteins,6,13,26 the concept of continuous beds has not successfully
`been transferred to the separation of nucleic acids by ion-pair
`reversed-phase HPLC (IP-RP-HPLC).27 We have utilized 200-(cid:237)m
`i.d. capillary columns packed with micropellicular polymer beads
`for the chromatographic separation and mass spectrometric
`characterization of nucleic acids up to 40 nucleotides by on-line
`IP-RP-HPLC-ESI-MS.28 Therefore, our goal in this study was to
`investigate the applicability of monolithic chromatographic beds
`to high-resolution separations of nucleic acids by IP-RP-HPLC and
`to extend the size range of the separated and detected nucleic
`acids. It is shown that both single- and double-stranded nucleic
`acids in a size range of 3 nucleotides (nt) to 600 base pairs (bp)
`can be separated with high efficiency and identified after separa-
`tion by ESI-MS.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
`Chemicals and Oligodeoxynucleotide Samples. Acetonitrile
`(HPLC gradient grade), divinylbenzene (synthesis grade), metha-
`nol (HPLC gradient grade), styrene (synthesis grade), and
`tetrahydrofuran (analytical reagent grade) were obtained from
`
`(17) Ericson, C.; Liao, J.-L.; Nakazato, K.; Hjerte´n, S. J. Chromatogr., A 1997,
`767, 33-41.
`(18) Oberacher, H.; Krajete, A.; Parson, W.; Huber, C. G. J. Chromatogr., A
`2000, in press.
`(19) Tomer, K. B.; Moseley, M. A.; Deterding, L. J.; Parker, C. E. Mass Spectrom.
`Rev. 1994, 13, 431-457.
`(20) Nordhoff, E.; Kirpekar, F.; Roepstorff, P. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1996, 15,
`76-138.
`(21) Portier, N.; Van Dorsselaer, A.; Cordier, Y.; Roch, O.; Bischoff, R. Nucleic
`Acids Res. 1994, 22(19), 3895-3903.
`(22) Stults, J. T.; Marsters, J. C. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1991, 5, 359-
`363.
`(23) Huber, C. G.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 5288-5295.
`(24) Wang, Q. C.; Svec, F.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. J. Chromatogr., A 1994, 669, 230-
`235.
`(25) Li, Y. M.; Brosted, P.; Hjerte´n, S.; Nyberg, F.; Silberring, J. J. Chromatogr.,
`B 1995, 664, 426-430.
`(26) Wang, Q. C.; Svec, F.; Fre´chet, J. M. J. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 2243-2248.
`(27) Huber, C. G. J. Chromatogr., A 1998, 806, 3-30.
`(28) Huber, C. G.; Krajete, A. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 3730-3739.
`
`Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Styrene and divinylbenzene were
`distilled before use. Acetic acid (analytical reagent grade), azo-
`bisisobutyronitrile (synthesis grade), decanol (synthesis grade),
`and triethylamine (p.a.) were purchased from Fluka (Buchs,
`Switzerland). A 1.0 M stock solution of triethylammonium acetate
`(TEAA) was prepared by dissolving equimolar amounts of tri-
`ethylamine and acetic acid in water. A 0.50 M stock solution of
`triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB) was prepared by passing
`carbon dioxide gas (AGA, Vienna, Austria) through a 0.50 M
`aqueous solution of triethylamine at 5 (cid:176)C until pH 8.4 -8.9 was
`reached. For preparation of all aqueous solutions, high-purity water
`(Epure, Barnstead Co., Newton, MA) was used. The standards of
`phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated oligodeoxynucleotides
`(p(dT)12-18, p(dT)12-18, p(dT)19-24, p(dT)25-30) were purchased as
`sodium salts from Pharmacia (Uppsala, Sweden) or Sigma-Aldrich
`(St. Louis, MO). The synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides (dT)24 (Mr
`7 238.71), a 5¢-dimethoxytritylated 5-mer (DMTr-ATGCG, Mr
`1805.42), and an 80-mer (CCCCAGTGCT GCAATGATAC CGC-
`GAGACCC ACGCTCACCG GCTCCAGATT TATCAGCAAT AAAC-
`CAGCCA GCCGGAAGGG, Mr 24 527.17) were ordered from
`Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland) and used without further
`purification. The size standard of double-stranded DNA restriction
`fragments (pBR322 DNA-Hae III digest) was purchased from
`Sigma Aldrich.
`Preparation of Monolithic and Packed-Bed Capillary
`Columns.29 Polyimide-coated fused silica capillary tubing of 350-
`(cid:237)m o.d. and 200-(cid:237)m i.d. was obtained from Polymicro Technolo-
`gies (Phoenix, AZ). A 1-m piece of fused silica capillary tubing
`was silanized with 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate accord-
`ing to the procedure published in ref 3030 in order to ensure
`immobilization of the monolith at the capillary wall. Then, a 300-
`mm piece of the silanized capillary was filled, using a plastic
`syringe, with a mixture comprising 50 (cid:237)L of styrene, 50 (cid:237)L of
`divinylbenzene, 130 (cid:237)L of decanol, 20 (cid:237)L of tetrahydrofuran, and
`10 mg/mL of azobisisobutyronitrile. The mixture was polymerized
`at 70 (cid:176)C for 24 h. After polymerization,
`the capillary was
`extensively flushed with acetonitrile at a flow rate of 5.0 (cid:237)L/min
`and finally cut into 60-mm-long pieces. Octadecylated PS-DVB
`particles (PS-DVB-C18) were synthesized as published in the
`literature.31 The PS-DVB-C18 stationary phase has been com-
`mercialized as DNASep by Transgenomic Inc. (Santa Clara, CA).
`Packed-bed capillary columns were prepared according to the
`procedure described in ref 18.18
`High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. The HPLC
`system consisted of a low-pressure gradient micro pump (model
`Rheos 2000, Flux Instruments, Karlskoga, Sweden) controlled by
`a personal computer, a vacuum degasser (Knauer, Berlin, Ger-
`many), a column thermostat made from 3.3-mm o.d. copper tubing
`which was heated by means of a circulating water bath (model K
`20 KP, Lauda, Lauda-Ko¨nigshofen, Germany), a microinjector
`(model C4-1004, Valco Instruments Co. Inc., Houston, TX) with a
`200- or 500-nL internal sample loop, a variable wavelength detector
`
`(29) Huber, C. G.; Premstaller, A.; Oberacher, H. Method for preparation of
`monolithic capillary columns for high performance liquid chromatography
`of single and double stranded nucleic acids. U. S. primary patent application,
`60/178.553.
`(30) Huang, X.; Horva´th, C. J. Chromatogr., A 1997, 788, 155-164.
`(31) Huber, C. G.; Oefner, P. J.; Bonn, G. K. Anal. Biochem. 1993, 212, 351-
`358.
`
`AnalyticalChemistry,Vol.72,No.18,September15,2000 4387
`
`2
`
`

`

`Figure 1. High-resolution capillary IP-RP-HPLC separation of
`phosphorylated oligodeoxynucleotide ladders in a monolithic capillary
`column. Column, continuous PS-DVB, 60 (cid:2) 0.20 mm i.d.; mobile
`phase, (A) 100 mM TEAA, pH 6.97, (B) 100 mM TEAA, pH 6.97,
`20% acetonitrile; linear gradient, 15-45% B in 3.5 min, 45-55% B
`in 2.5 min, 55-65% B in 4.0 min; flow-rate, 2.5 (cid:237)L/min; temperature,
`50 (cid:176) C; detection, UV, 254 nm; sample, p(dA)12-18, p(dT)12-30,
`40-98 fmol of each oligodeoxynucleotide.
`
`Figure 2. High-resolution capillary IP-RP-HPLC separation of a
`mixture of double-stranded DNA fragments in a monolithic capillary
`column. Column, continuous PS-DVB, 60 (cid:2) 0.20 mm i.d.; mobile
`phase, (A) 100 mM TEAA, pH 7.00, (B) 100 mM TEAA, pH 7.00,
`20% acetonitrile; linear gradient, 35-75% B in 3.0 min, 75-95% B
`in 12.0 min; flow-rate, 2.2 (cid:237)L/min; temperature, 50 (cid:176) C; detection, UV,
`254 nm; sample, pBR322 DNA-Hae III digest, 1.81 fmol of each
`fragment.
`
`(model UltiMate UV detector, LC Packings, Amsterdam, Neth-
`erlands) with a Z-shaped capillary detector cell ULT-UZ-N-10, 3nL
`cell, LC Packings), and a PC-based data system (Chromeleon 4.30,
`Dionex-Softron, Germering, Germany).
`Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry and Coupling
`with Capillary Liquid Chromatography. ESI-MS was performed
`on a Finnigan MAT LCQ quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer
`(Finnigan MAT, San Jose, CA, used in Figures 4-7) or a Finnigan
`MAT TSQ 7000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (used in
`Figure 3) equipped with an electrospray ion source. The capillary
`column was directly connected to the spray capillary (fused silica,
`105-(cid:237)m o.d., 40-(cid:237)m i.d., Polymicro Technologies) by means of a
`microtight union (Upchurch Scientific, Oak Harbor, WA). A
`syringe pump equipped with a 250-(cid:237)L glass syringe (Unimetrics,
`
`4388 AnalyticalChemistry,Vol.72,No.18,September15,2000
`
`Figure 3. Scanning electron micrographs of (a) underivatized PS-
`DVB particles, (b) octadecylated PS-DVB particles, and (c) an
`underivatized PS-DVB monolith.
`
`Shorewood, IL) was used for continuous-infusion experiments and
`for pumping sheath liquid. For analysis with pneumatically assisted
`ESI, an electrospray voltage of 3.2-3.7 kV and a nitrogen sheath
`gas flow of 20-30 arbitrary units (LCQ) or 28-33 psi (TSQ) were
`employed. The temperature of the heated capillary was set to 200
`(cid:176)C. Total ion chromatograms and mass spectra were recorded
`on a personal computer with the LCQ Navigator software version
`1.2 or on a DEC-Alpha 3000 workstation with the ICIS software
`version 8.3.0 (Finnigan). Mass calibration and coarse tuning was
`performed in the positive-ion mode by direct infusion of a solution
`
`3
`
`

`

`Figure 4. Separation and mass analysis of a series of oligodeoxy-
`thymidylic acids. Column, continuous PS-DVB, 60 (cid:2) 0.20 mm i.d.;
`mobile phase, (A) 10 mM TEAA, pH 7.00, (B) 10 mM TEAA, pH 7.00,
`20% acetonitrile; linear gradient, 20-60% B in 10.0 min; flow-rate,
`temperature, 50 (cid:176)C; scan, 800-2000 amu in 2 s;
`3.2 (cid:237)L/min;
`electrospray voltage, 3.8 kV; sheath gas, 34 psi N2; sheath liquid,
`acetonitrile; flow rate, 3.0 (cid:237)L/min; sample, (dT)6-18, 50 ng.
`
`of caffeine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), methionyl-arginyl-phenylalanyl-
`alanine (Finnigan), and Ultramark 1621 (Finnigan). Fine tuning
`for ESI-MS of oligodeoxynucleotides in the negative-ion mode was
`performed by infusion of 3.0 (cid:237)L/min of a 20 pmol/(cid:237)L solution of
`(dT)24 in 25 mM aqueous TEAB containing 20% acetonitrile
`(v/v). A sheath flow of 3.0 (cid:237)L/min acetonitrile was added through
`the triaxial electrospray probe. For all direct infusion experiments,
`cations present in the oligodeoxynucleotide samples were re-
`moved by on-line cation exchange using a 20 (cid:2) 0.50 mm i.d.
`cation-exchange microcolumn packed with 38-75-(cid:237)m Dowex 50
`WX8 particles (BioRad, Richmond, CA).23 For IP-RP-HPLC-ESI-
`MS analysis, oligodeoxynucleotides and DNA fragments were
`injected without prior cation removal.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`Performance of the Monolithic Capillary Columns for
`Oligodeoxynucleotide- and dsDNA Separations. Since slow
`mass transfer kinetics is often the limiting factor for speed and
`efficiency in biopolymer separations, the enhancement of intra-
`particular mass transfer is particularly important for the rapid
`chromatographic separation of large molecules having low diffu-
`sivities such as nucleic acids.32 One way to circumvent intrapar-
`ticular diffusion is the complete elimination of the support pores
`resulting in stationary phases of the micropellicular configura-
`tion.27,33,34 The main advantage of such sorbents rests with the
`rapid mass transfer, because the only remaining particle-based
`diffusion limitations are in a thin layer at the surface of nonporous
`particles. This allows the rapid separation of oligodeoxynucleotides
`and DNA fragments within a fraction of the time that is required
`with conventional porous packing materials.27,35 Consequently, to
`
`(32) Chen, H.; Horva´th, C. J. Chromatogr., A 1995, 705, 3-20.
`(33) Unger, K. K.; Jilge, G.; Kinkel, J. N.; Hearn, M. T. W. J. Chromatogr. 1986,
`359, 61-72.
`(34) Kalghatgi, K.; Horva´th, C. In Analytical Biotechnology-Capillary Electrophoresis
`and Chromatography; Horva´th, C., Nikelly, J. G., Eds.; American Chemical
`Society: Washington, DC, 1990; pp 163-180.
`(35) Huber, C. G.; Oefner, P. J.; Bonn, G. K. Chromatographia 1993, 37, 653-
`658.
`
`Figure 5. Quality control of a synthetic 80-mer oligodeoxynucleotide.
`Column, continuous PS-DVB, 60 (cid:2) 0.20 mm i.d.; mobile phase, (A)
`25 mM TEAB, pH 8.40, (B) 25 mM TEAB, pH 8.40, 20% acetonitrile;
`linear gradient, 20-100% B in 15 min;
`flow-rate, 3.0 (cid:237)L/min;
`temperature, 50 (cid:176) C; scan, 1000-3000 amu; electrospray voltage, 3.2
`kV; sheath gas, 30 units; sheath liquid, acetonitrile; flow rate, 3.0 (cid:237)L/
`min; sample, 5.0 pmol raw product.
`
`maintain the separation speed and performance upon the transition
`from a packed to a monolithic chromatographic bed, the synthesis
`of a monolith has to be tuned such that its morphology resembles
`that of a chromatographic bed formed by nonporous particles with
`relatively large channels for convective flow and without any
`micropores. Therefore, we used decanol and tetrahydrofuran as
`porogens with relatively poor solvency for poly(styrene/divinyl-
`benzene) (PS-DVB), resulting in the formation of large channels
`in the monolithic bed.
`Following polymerization, extensive washing with acetonitrile,
`and equilibration with 100 mM TEAA-5.0% acetonitrile solution,
`
`AnalyticalChemistry,Vol.72,No.18,September15,2000 4389
`
`4
`
`

`

`Table 1. Comparison of the Resolution Values for
`Oligodexynucleotides and Double Stranded DNA using
`Packed and Monolithic Capillary Columns
`
`compounds
`
`p(dT)12/p(dT)13
`p(dT)29/p(dT)30
`51/57 bp
`540/587 bp
`
`resolution
`with packed column
`with monolithic column
`
`3.05
`1.04
`3.88
`1.11
`
`5.38
`2.38
`5.15
`2.70
`
`ticles of the same dimensions. The permeabilities of the monolithic
`columns and the packed columns were similar, resulting in back
`pressures between 18 and 20 MPa at a flow rate of 2.6 (cid:237)L/min
`and a 50 (cid:176)C column temperature, which indicates that the dimen-
`sion of the channels for convective flow in both chromatographic
`beds is of approximately the same size. The relative standard
`deviations of the peak widths at half-height, both among various
`batches of packed capillary columns and monolithic capillary
`columns, were better than 10%, which demonstrates that column
`preparation was reproducible and allowed the comparison of the
`chromatographic performance of both column types. The chro-
`matographic performance was evaluated by gradient separation
`of a mixture of (dT)12-18 with a gradient of 5.0-12.0% acetonitrile
`in 100 mM TEAA in 10 min. Three injections of the standard onto
`each of the three columns gave average peak widths at half-height
`for (dT)18 of 2.28 ( 0.22 s (sample size N ) 9, standard deviation
`sd ) 0.29 s, level of significance P ) 95%) for the monolithic
`columns and 3.84 ( 0.16 s (N ) 9, sd ) 0.20 s, P ) 95%) for the
`packed-bed capillary columns. These values demonstrate that the
`chromatographic performance of monolithic columns for oligode-
`oxynucleotide separations is approximately 40% better than that
`of packed-bed columns. The chromatographic efficiency of the
`monolithic columns was determined by isocratic elution of (dT)18
`with an eluent containing 7.8% acetonitrile in 100 mM TEAA at a
`flow rate of 2.4 (cid:237)L/min. At a column temperature of 50 (cid:176)C, the
`number of theoretical plates exceeded 11 500 plates for a 60-mm
`column, corresponding to 191 000 theoretical plates per meter.
`Figure 1 illustrates the high-resolution separation of phospho-
`rylated oligodeoxyadenylic- and oligothymidylic acids ranging in
`size from 12 to 30 nt. Gradient elution with 3.0-9.0% acetonitrile
`in 3.5 min, followed by 9.0-11.0% acetonitrile in 2.5 min, and finally
`11.0-13.0% acetonitrile in 4.0 min in 100 mM TEAA resulted in
`peak widths at half-height of 1.3 s for p(dA)12 to 2.4 s for p(dT)30,
`which allowed the baseline resolution of the whole series up to
`the 30-mer within 8.2 min. The resolution of homologous oligode-
`oxynucleotides obtained with the monolithic column clearly
`surpasses that of a capillary column packed with PS-DVB-C18
`beads (Table 1, compare also Figure 1 in ref 2828).
`IP-RP-HPLC has been shown to be efficient not only for the
`rapid separation of single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides but also
`for the fractionation of double-stranded DNA fragments up to chain
`lengths of 2000 bp.36 The applicability of the monolithic PS-DVB
`stationary phase to the IP-RP-HPLC separation of double-stranded
`DNA was tested by injection of a pBR322 DNA-Hae III digest,
`which was separated in 12.5 min using a gradient of 7.0-15.0%
`acetonitrile in 3 min, followed by 15.0-19.0% acetonitrile in 12
`
`(36) Huber, C. G.; Oefner, P. J.; Bonn, G. K. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 578-585.
`
`Figure 6. Separation and mass analysis of double-stranded DNA
`fragments from a restriction digest of the pBR322 plasmid. Column,
`continuous PS-DVB, 60 (cid:2) 0.20 mm i.d.; mobile phase, (A) 25 mM
`TEAB, pH 8.40, (B) 25 mM TEAB, pH 8.40, 20% acetonitrile; linear
`gradient, 15-30% B in 3.0 min, followed by 30-50% B in 12 min;
`flow rate, 2.8 (cid:237)L/min; temperature, 40 (cid:176)C; scan, 1000-3000 amu;
`electrospray voltage, 3.2 kV; sheath gas, 32 units; sheath liquid,
`acetonitrile; flow rate, 3 (cid:237)L/min; sample, pBR322 DNA-HaeIII digest,
`180 fmol of each fragment.
`
`Figure 7. Extracted mass spectra of the 80 bp (a), 123/124 bp (b),
`and 267 bp (c) fragments of
`the pBR322 DNA-Hae III digest.
`Conditions as in Figure 6.
`
`the performance of three different 60 (cid:2) 0.20 mm i.d. monolithic
`capillary columns was compared with that of three columns
`packed with octadecylated, 2.3-(cid:237)m micropellicular PS-DVB par-
`
`4390 AnalyticalChemistry,Vol.72,No.18,September15,2000
`
`5
`
`

`

`min in 100 mM TEAA at a flow rate of 2.2 (cid:237)L/min. Again, the
`chromatogram of the mixture depicted in Figure 2 with fragments
`ranging from 51 to 587 bp, as well as the resolution values given
`in Table 1, demonstrate that the separation performance of
`monolithic columns is superior to that of packed-bed columns with
`respect to their separation capability for nucleic acids (compare
`also Figure 1 in ref 3636). In this context, one distinctive difference
`between the octadecylated PS-DVB stationary phase and the PS-
`DVB monolith deserves discussion. While derivatization with
`octadecyl groups has been shown to be essential to obtain high
`chromatographic efficiency with PS-DVB particles,31,37 monolithic
`stationary phases exhibit superior efficiency already without
`derivatization. One possible explanation for this different behavior
`is the formation of the polymer in two different chemical environ-
`ments. The PS-DVB particles were polymerized in aqueous
`suspension, where poor solvation of the hydrophobic polymer by
`the hydrophilic solvent resulted in a relatively flat surface, as
`revealed by the scanning electron micrograph depicted in Figure
`3a. The particle surface became rugulose after derivatization with
`octadecyl groups offering a contact area greater than that of a
`smooth spherical particle (Figure 3b). The formation of the
`monolithic bed, on the other hand, took place in an entirely
`organic environment. During polymerization, small primary par-
`ticles of approximately 0.5 (cid:237)m coagulated to form the porous
`monolith, resulting in a surface structure which came close to
`that of the octadecylated PS-DVB particles (Figure 3c).
`On-line Separation and Mass Determination of Synthetic
`Oligodeoxynucleotides. For many of the analytical problems
`encountered with oligodeoxynucleotides, chromatographic separa-
`tion in combination with UV detection is not sufficient to get a
`conclusive answer. The on-line conjugation of chromatographic
`separation to mass spectrometry, however, offers a potent tool
`for the characterization and identification of oligodeoxynucleotides
`on the basis of accurate mass determinations and fragmentation
`patterns. For example, the HPLC-UV analysis of a (dT)12-18
`standard that was left overnight at room temperature showed a
`number of small peaks eluting before the seven major peaks
`(chromatogram not shown). We supposed that the small peaks
`were phosphorylated or nonphosphorylated hydrolysis products
`of (dT)12-18, but this assumption was not definitive until the
`separation system was on-line-coupled to ESI-MS, which revealed
`that they were nonphosphorylated hydrolyzates ranging from the
`6-mer to the 11-mer (Figure 4). Application of a gradient from 4
`to 12.0% acetonitrile in 10 mM TEAA enabled the separation of
`all oligothymidylic acids from the 6-mer to the 18-mer. As
`suggested in a recent report, acetonitrile was added postcolumn
`as sheath liquid to enhance the mass spectrometric detectability
`of the separated oligodeoxynucleotides.38 This example demon-
`strates that, by using on-line IP-RP-HPLC-ESI-MS, the unequivocal
`identification of low femtomole amounts of oligodeoxynucleotides
`is feasible on the basis of their molecular masses (Table 2). With
`a gradient of 4.0-12.0% acetonitrile in 50 mM TEAA in 10 min,
`oligothymidylic acids as small as the 3-mer were eluted as sharp
`and symmetric peaks (chromatogram not shown), whereas mono-
`nucleotides could not be chromatographed, even with a neat
`
`(37) Huber, C. G.; Oefner, P. J.; Preuss, E.; Bonn, G. K. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993,
`21, 1061-1066.
`(38) Huber, C. G.; Krajete, A. J. Chromatogr., A 2000, 870, 413-424.
`
`Table 2. Measured and Theoretical Masses of (dT)6-18
`
`oligodeoxy-
`nucleotide
`
`retentiontime
`(min)
`
`molecular mass
`measured
`theoretical
`
`rel deviation
`(%)
`
`(dT)6
`(dT)7
`(dT)8
`(dT)9
`(dT)10
`(dT)11
`(dT)12
`(dT)13
`(dT)14
`(dT)15
`(dT)16
`(dT)17
`(dT)18
`
`1.77
`2.63
`3.59
`4.35
`4.94
`5.44
`5.76
`6.13
`6.39
`6.66
`6.92
`7.12
`7.35
`
`1763.09
`2066.96
`2371.90
`2675.28
`2978.95
`3284.43
`3589.29
`3892.78
`4197.47
`4501.81
`4806.26
`5109.19
`5413.35
`
`1763.21
`2067.40
`2371.59
`2675.79
`2979.98
`3284.18
`3588.37
`3892.57
`4196.76
`4500.96
`4805.15
`5109.35
`5413.54
`
`0.006
`0.021
`-0.013
`0.019
`0.035
`-0.008
`-0.026
`-0.006
`-0.017
`-0.019
`-0.023
`0.003
`0.004
`
`aqueous eluent, due to the lack of retention. From the crystal
`structure of the trinucleotide (A)3 it can be inferred that a 3-mer
`oligodeoxynucleotide has an almost globular structure with a
`diameter of approximately 1.0 nm.39 Because penetration of
`analytes into micropores of commensurate size would cause
`considerable band broadening, the capability of the monolithic
`stationary phase to efficiently separate such small molecules is a
`good indicator for the absence of micropores.
`Refined chemistry has significantly improved the efficiency of
`automated solid-phase synthesis of long oligodeoxynucleotide
`sequences. However, assuming a coupling efficiency of 98-99%
`per synthesis cycle, the maximum yield of an 80-mer oligodeoxy-
`nucleotide will be only 20-45%, and contamination of the target
`sequence with a number of failure sequences or partially depro-
`tected sequences is generally observed.28,40 Figure 5a illustrates
`the analysis of 5.0 pmol of a crude 80-mer oligodeoxynucleotide.
`The high number of partly resolved peaks eluting between 2 and
`6 min made identification and quantitation of the target sequence
`from the reconstructed ion chromatogram impossible. However,
`extraction of a selected ion chromatogram at m/z 1167.0, 1225.5,
`and 1290.0 clearly identified the target sequence eluting at 3.8
`min (Figure 5b). Averaging and deconvolution of four mass
`spectra between 3.7 and 3.8 min yielded a molecular mass of
`24 525.0 (Figure 5c), which correlates well with a theoretical mass
`of 24 527.17 (0.009% relative deviation). Moreover, the deconvo-
`luted mass spectrum (inset in Figure 5c) did not show notable
`cation adduction, which verifies that IP-RP-HPLC is an efficient
`method for the desalting of oligodeoxynucleotides. Comparison
`of the mass spectrum extracted from the chromatogram (Figure
`5c) with that of an 80-mer obtained by direct-infusion ESI-MS
`(compare Figure 3 in ref 2323) clearly corroborates the high value
`of on-line coupling of chromatographic separation to mass
`spectrometry, because the chemical background in the mass
`spectrum is greatly reduced upon chromatographic separation,
`and exact mass measurement is possible using IP-RP-HPLC-ESI-
`MS with only one fiftieth of the amount of sample that is consumed
`during direct-infusion ESI-MS.
`On-line Separation and Mass Determination of dsDNA
`Fragments. The potential to obtain high-quality ESI mass spectra
`
`(39) Suck, D.; Manor, P. C.; Saenger, W. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1976, 32,
`1727-1737.
`(40) Huber, C. G.; Stimpfl, E.; Oefner, P. J.; Bonn, G. K. LC-GC 1996, 14, 114-
`127.
`
`AnalyticalChemistry,Vol.72,No.18,September15,2000 4391
`
`6
`
`

`

`Table 3. Molecular Masses of Double-Stranded DNA
`Fragments from the pBR322 DNA-Hae III Digest
`
`fragment
`
`51
`57
`64
`80
`89
`104
`123
`124
`184
`192
`213
`234
`267
`434
`458
`502
`540
`587
`
`positiona
`942-992
`993-1049
`534-597
`3410-3489
`832-920
`298-401
`175-297
`402-525
`1263-1446
`4344-174
`1050-1262
`598-831
`3490-3756
`2518-2951
`2952-3409
`1447-1948
`1949-2488
`3757-4343
`
`molecular mass
`measuredb
`theoretical
`31 565 ( 24 (4)
`35 252 ( 54 (6)
`39 573 ( 84 (7)
`49 494 ( 43 (10)
`55 058 ( 41 (14)
`64 391 ( 56 (22)
`76 059 ( 49 (15)
`76 731 ( 44 (17)
`113 802 ( 140 (15)
`118 722 ( 123 (17)
`131 733 ( 148 (18)
`144 708 ( 127 (25)
`165 091 ( 230 (12)
`n. d.c
`n. d.
`n. d.
`n. d.
`n. d.
`
`31 559.57
`35 263.04
`39 592.83
`49 475.35
`55 038.97
`64 312.99
`76 045.76
`76 675.05
`113 747.36
`118 668.82
`131 674.02
`144 646.56
`165 019.11
`268 240.41
`283 002.81
`310 240.12
`333 738.33
`362 707.09
`
`rel deviation
`(%)
`
`0.018
`-0.032
`-0.026
`0.038
`0.034
`0.12
`0.017
`0.073
`0.048
`0.045
`0.045
`0.042
`0.044
`n. d.
`n. d.
`n. d.
`n. d.
`n. d.
`
`a Position relative to the Eco RI restriction site in pBR322. b Mo-
`lecular mass given as average ( standard deviation (number of charge
`states used to calculate the average molecular mass). c Not determined.
`
`of large, double-stranded DNA is essentially determined by the
`amount of salt as well as the number of different compounds
`present in the sample mixture.21,41 Recently, Muddiman et. al.
`published the mass spectrum of a 500-bp polymerase chain
`reaction product, which had been purified by ethanol precipitation
`followed by microdialysis.42 Although the amount of DNA that
`was analyzed in the ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer
`was in the low femtomole range, much more material was required
`for purification before mass measurement. Hence, there is an
`urgent need for rapid on-line separation and purification protocols
`requiring only minute sample amou

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket