throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`
`MODERNATX, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`CUREVAC AG
`Patent Owner
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,383,340
`_____________________
`
`Inter Partes Review Case No. Unassigned
`_____________________
`
`DECLARATION OF PROF. DAVID HORNBY, PH.D.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`MTX1002
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`I. 
`II. 
`III. 
`IV. 
`V. 
`VI. 
`
`B. 
`
`3. 
`
`Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 
`My Background and Qualifications ............................................................. 2 
`Summary of Opinions .................................................................................. 5 
`List of Documents I Considered in Formulating My Opinions .................. 12 
`Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art ............................................................ 17 
`State of the Art Before December 22, 2006 ............................................... 18 
`A.  Before 2006, Researches Desired Large Quantities of Pure
`RNA for Use in a Variety of RNA-based Applications ..................... 19 
`Ion-pair Reversed-Phase High Performance Liquid
`Chromatography (IP RP HPLC) was a Standard Tool for
`Purifying RNA ................................................................................... 21 
`1. 
`Overview of HPLC, RP HPLC, and IP RP HPLC .................. 22 
`IP RP HPLC was Routinely Used
`for RNA
`2. 
`Purification Before 2006 ......................................................... 27 
`IP RP HPLC was Also Applicable for Large Scale
`(Preparative) Purification of RNA ........................................... 29 
`C.  Polystyrenedivinylbenzene (PSDVB) was a Known Material
`for Use as the Stationary Phase in PR RP HPLC ............................... 30 
`D.  Non-Alkylated PSDVB was Known and Used to Purify
`RNA .................................................................................................. 34 
`E.  Porous PSDVB was Known and Used for Purification of
`RNA .................................................................................................. 36 
`The '340 Patent Specification and Claims .................................................. 38 
`VII. 
`VIII.  Claim Construction .................................................................................... 40 
`IX. 
`Summary Chart of Analysis Over the Art .................................................. 42 
`X. 
`The Basis of my Analysis with Respect to Anticipation ............................ 43 
`XI. 
`Ground 1: Gjerde I Discloses Every Limitation of Claims 1-5, 8, 10-
`22, and 26, as Claimed, and Would Have Enabled a POSA to
`Practice the Claimed Invention without Undue Experimentation .............. 44 
`The Basis of my Analysis with Respect to Obviousness ........................... 81 
`XII. 
`XIII.  Ground 2: Claims 1, 3, 4, 6-19, and 21-26 would have been obvious
`over the combination of Zhang and Lloyd ................................................. 83 
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`2. 
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`A.  Claim 1 .............................................................................................. 84 
`1. 
`A POSA Would Have Had a Reason to Combine
`Zhang and Lloyd ...................................................................... 92 
`A POSA Would Have Had a Reasonable Expectation
`of Success ................................................................................ 93 
`B.  Claims 3 and 4. .................................................................................. 95 
`C.  Claims 6 and 7 ................................................................................... 99 
`D.  Claim 8. ........................................................................................... 102 
`E.  Claim 9. ........................................................................................... 104 
`F.  Claim 10. ......................................................................................... 106 
`G.  Claim 11. ......................................................................................... 109 
`H.  Claims 12-14. .................................................................................. 111 
`I.  Claims 15 and 16. ............................................................................ 114 
`J.  Claim 17 .......................................................................................... 117 
`K.  Claims 18 and 19 ............................................................................. 119 
`L.  Claims 21 and 22. ............................................................................ 122 
`M.  Claims 23-25 ................................................................................... 125 
`N.  Claim 26. ......................................................................................... 128 
`XIV.  Ground 3: Claim 2 Would Have Been Obvious Over
`the
`Combination of Sullenger and Lloyd ....................................................... 130 
`A.  Claim 2. ........................................................................................... 131 
`1. 
`A POSA would have had a reason to combine
`Sullenger and Lloyd ............................................................... 133 
`A POSA Would Have Had a Reasonable Expectation
`of Success .............................................................................. 134 
`XV.  Ground 4: Claim 5 Would Have Been Obvious Over
`the
`Combination of Zhang, Lloyd, and
`the 2004-2005 Polymer
`Laboratories Catalog ................................................................................ 137 
`A.  Claim 5. ........................................................................................... 137 
`1. 
`A POSA Would Have Had a Reason to Combine
`Zhang, Lloyd, and
`the 2004-2005 Polymer
`Laboratories Catalog ............................................................ 140 
`A POSA Would Have Had a Reasonable Expectation
`of Success .............................................................................. 142 
`XVI.  Ground 5: Claim 20 Would Have Been Obvious Over the
`Combination of Zhang, Lloyd and Gjerde II ........................................... 144 
`A.  Claim 20. ......................................................................................... 144 
`
`2. 
`
`2. 
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`1. 
`
`2. 
`
`A POSA Would Have Had a Reason to Combine
`Lloyd, Zhang, and Gjerde II .................................................. 145 
`A POSA Would Have Had a Reasonable Expectation
`of Success .............................................................................. 147 
`XVII.  No Objective Evidence Supports Non-Obviousness of the Claimed
`Methods ................................................................................................... 148 
`A.  CureVac did not Compare the Results to the Closest Prior
`Art .................................................................................................... 149 
`B.  CureVac Tested Methods that are Not Commensurate in
`Scope with the Claims ..................................................................... 150 
`C.  The Results Achieved With the Claimed Methods Are Due
`to a Feature That Was Disclosed in Prior Art .................................. 153 
`XVIII.  Conclusion ............................................................................................... 154 
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`I, David Hornby, Ph.D., hereby declare as follows.
`I.
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`Introduction
`1.
`
`I am over the age of eighteen (18) and competent to make this
`
`declaration.
`
`2.
`
`I have been retained as an expert witness on behalf of MODERNATX,
`
`INC. ("MODERNA") for the above-captioned inter partes review (IPR). I am being
`
`compensated for my time in connection with this IPR at my standard consulting
`
`rate, which is $450 per hour.
`
`3.
`
`I understand that this Declaration accompanies a petition for IPR
`
`involving U.S. Patent No. 8,383,340 ("the '340 patent") (EX1001), which resulted
`
`from U.S. Patent Application No. 12/520,172 ("the '172 application"), which
`
`entered the U.S. national stage from PCT No. PCT/EP2007/011294 filed on
`
`December 20, 2007. I understand that the PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) filing
`
`date is the U.S. filing date under the law. I also understand that the '340 patent
`
`alleges priority benefit of German Patent Application DE 10 2006 061 015, filed
`
`on December 22, 2006. I refer to this date throughout this declaration.
`
`4. The '340 patent names Thomas Ketterer, Florian Von Der Mulbe,
`
`Ladislaus Reidel, and Thorsten Mutzke as inventors. The '340 patent was issued
`
`on February 26, 2013. I understand that, according to the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office ("USPTO") records, the '340 patent is currently assigned to
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`CureVac AG ("the patentee"). Throughout this declaration, I refer to the patentee
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`as "CureVac."
`
`5.
`
`In preparing this Declaration, I have reviewed the '340 patent and each
`
`of the documents cited herein, in light of general knowledge in the art. In
`
`formulating my opinions, I have relied upon my experience, education, and
`
`knowledge in the relevant art. In formulating my opinions, I have also considered
`
`the viewpoint of a person of ordinary skill in the art ("POSA") (i.e., a person of
`
`ordinary skill in the field of purifying nucleic acids, as defined further below in §
`
`V) prior to December 22, 2006.
`
`II. My Background and Qualifications
`6.
`I am an expert in the field of nucleic acid biochemistry, which
`
`includes manipulation, analysis, purification, and applications of nucleic acids. I
`
`have been actively working in this field since prior to 1985. I received my B.Sc. in
`
`Biochemistry in 1980, and my Ph.D. in Biochemistry in 1984, both from the
`
`University of Sheffield. I was a postdoctoral research associate at Department of
`
`Biochemistry, University of Sheffield in 1984, then a postdoctoral research
`
`associate at Biozentrum der Universitat Basel from 1985-1986.
`
`7.
`
`I became a lecturer in the Department of Biochemistry, University of
`
`Sheffield from 1986-1990. In 1990, I was awarded an EMBO fellowship at the
`
`Gene Expression Program of EMBL, Heidelberg. I became a lecturer from 1990-
`
`- 2 -
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`1994, and then a senior lecturer from 1994-1998, in the Department of Molecular
`
`Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield. Since 1993, I have also been
`
`a visiting scientist at Department of Molecular Biology, the Scripps Research
`
`Institute, La Jolla, CA.
`
`8.
`
`I became a Professor of Biochemistry at the Department of Molecular
`
`Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield in 1999 and served in this
`
`capacity until 2007. From 2007-2012, I was Head of the Department of Molecular
`
`Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield. Since 2013, I have been a
`
`Professor of Biochemistry in the Department of Molecular Biology and
`
`Biotechnology, University of Sheffield. Since 2013, I have also been a Director of
`
`Research and Innovation for Liverpool Life Science University Technical College.
`
`9.
`
`I have served other roles in my professional career, including as a
`
`Director of Invector Ltd. from 1997-1999, where I was a co-founder, and as a
`
`Director of Protealysis Ltd. from 2002-2008, where I was also a co-founder.
`
`Invector Ltd. and Protealysis Ltd. were both based on nucleic acid separation and
`
`stabilization technologies.
`
`10.
`
`I was a Director of the Transgenomic Research Laboratory from
`
`1999-2002. There, I was directly involved in developing separation methods of
`
`RNA using HPLC. Additionally, I served as a Director of Combigen Ltd. from
`
`2004-2014, and as Acting Chair of BioServ UK Ltd. from 2011-2012.
`
`- 3 -
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`11.
`
`In my various professional positions, I have made significant
`
`contributions to the field of nucleic acid purification, including developing
`
`methods for the isolation and analysis of both DNA and RNA. See, e.g., "High-
`
`throughput analysis of nucleic acid modification reactions using ion-pair reveres-
`
`phase high-performance liquid chromatography," Anal. Biochem., 301(2):290-7
`
`(2000);
`
`"Isolation of
`
`single-stranded DNA using denaturing DNA
`
`chromatography," Anal. Biochem., 284(1):164-7 (2002). My work has resulted in
`
`the publication of more than 60 papers and nine textbook chapters. I am also an
`
`inventor on multiple patents, the majority of which are in the field of nucleic acid
`
`purification. I have co-authored two books in the field of nucleic acid purification.
`
`See, e.g., Gjerde, D.T., Hanna, C.P. and Hornby, D., DNA Chromatography,
`
`Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2002; and Gjerde,
`
`D.T., Hoang L., and Hornby D., RNA Purification and Analysis: Sample
`
`Preparation, Extraction, Chromatography, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.
`
`KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2009.
`
`12.
`
`In addition to my educational training, and professional and research
`
`experiences described above, I have kept abreast of the field of nucleic acid
`
`biochemistry and biology by reading scientific literature, conferring with
`
`colleagues in the field, attending and presenting at scientific conferences, and
`
`presenting at invited lectures. I have served as a peer reviewer for several
`
`- 4 -
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`scientific journals including: Nucleic Acids Research, FEBS Letters, Biochemical
`
`Journal, Biochemistry, Molecular Microbiology, and Journal of Molecular
`
`Biology. I have also served as an Editor for International Journal of Biophysics
`
`since 2009. I have also served on advisory boards for a number of companies and
`
`organizations, e.g., Varian Inc., PhyNexus, Bioline (now Meridian), and
`
`Transgenomic Ltd (now Precipio).
`
`13. Accordingly, I am an expert in the field of nucleic acid biochemistry,
`
`and have been since prior to December 2006. For that reason, I am qualified to
`
`provide an opinion as to what a skilled person would have understood, known, or
`
`concluded before December 22, 2006.
`
`III. Summary of Opinions
`14. Claims 1-26 of the
`
`'340 patent are directed to methods of
`
`chromatographic purification of RNA using a porous non-alkylated
`
`polystyrenedivinylbenzene ("PSDVB") material as the stationary phase. EX1001,
`
`19:57- 22:29.
`
`15.
`
`In this declaration, I consider the RNA purification methods of the
`
`'340 patent in relation to the state of the art as of December 22, 2006. The prior art
`
`references that I considered when comparing the claims of the '340 patent to the
`
`state of the art included U.S. Patent No. 6,576,133 ("Gjerde I") (EX1004), a
`
`review article by Lloyd ("Lloyd") (EX1005), a review article by Zhang ("Zhang")
`
`- 5 -
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`(EX1038), a review article by Sullenger ("Sullenger") (EX1039), U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,066,258 ("Gjerde II") (EX1006), and the 2004-2005 Polymer Laboratories
`
`Catalog (EX1024). I also considered the file history of the '340 patent (EX1021)
`
`and other exhibits cited herein. A summary of my opinions follows.
`
`16.
`
` Zhang is a review article that discusses antisense strategies and their
`
`use for human therapeutics. EX1038, 11:1. Zhang provides examples of antisense
`
`agents, such as ribozymes, antisense oligonucleotides, and small interfering
`
`RNAs. Id. Zhang further teaches that antisense therapeutics is "a viable and
`
`effective gene therapy approach," and that "more preclinical and clinical
`
`investigations [of antisense agents] are anticipated to take place in the near
`
`future." Id.
`
`17. Sullenger is a review article that teaches that another example of a
`
`therapeutic application of RNA is "immunotherapy using mRNA." EX1039,
`
`256:1:3-257:1:4. Sullenger teaches that "the RNA therapeutic developmental
`
`pipeline is burgeoning and the next generation of RNA-based therapeutics are
`
`quickly making its way through pre-clinical studies." Id., 257:1:5. Further,
`
`according
`
`to Sullenger, "the preclinical experience suggests
`
`that cancer
`
`vaccination with [mRNA-based immunotherapy] may constitute a highly effective
`
`and broadly application treatment for patients with recurring cancer." Id., 257:1:3.
`
`- 6 -
`
`10
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`18. Gjerde I, Gjerde II, and Lloyd all disclose methods of purifying RNA
`
`using polystyrenedivinylbenzene-based (PSDVB) columns by means of ion-pair
`
`reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (IP RP HPLC). EX1004,
`
`1:28-32; 3:60-64; 7:24-31; 7:53-64; 13:27-31; 31:30-35; EX1006, 9:54-55; 20:41-
`
`44; 23:48-52; EX1005, 223:Abstract; 228:1:2; 226:Fig. 1. Gjerde I, Gjerde II, and
`
`Lloyd also provide detailed descriptions of IP RP HPLC methods for purifying
`
`RNA, including buffers, conditions, elution strategies, etc. EX1004, 1:28-32;
`
`3:60-64; 7:24-31; 7:53-64; 13:27-31; 31:30-35; EX1006, 9:54-55; 20:41-44;
`
`23:48-52; EX1005, 223:Abstract; 228:1:2; 226:Fig. 1. Gjerde I and Lloyd
`
`specifically teach porous non-alkylated PSDVB columns for purifying RNA.
`
`EX1005, 224:2:3; 225:1:1; EX1004, 31:30-56; 23:6-33. Lloyd further teaches that
`
`its methods are especially suited for production of "large quantities" of
`
`oligonucleotides, such as antisense agents. EX1005, 226:1:1-227:2:1.
`
`19. The 2004-2005 Polymer Laboratories Catalog teaches that porous
`
`non-alkylated PSDVB columns are "ideal for oligonucleotide analysis." EX1024,
`
`105:1:1. Also, the 2003-2004 Polymer Laboratories Catalog teaches that the
`
`PLRP-S material has different pore and particles sizes. EX1024, 84, 126. And the
`
`2004-2005 Polymer Laboratories Catalog teaches that with PLRP-S, it is possible
`
`to purify "small oligonucleotides, typically 20-30 mer," as well as "even very large
`
`oligomers." Id., 105:1:2-2-1.
`
`
`
`- 7 -
`
`11
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`20. As discussed more fully below, Gjerde I teaches all elements of
`
`claims 1-5, 8, 10-22, and 26 of the '340 patent, arranged as claimed. The detailed
`
`descriptions in Example 10 (which prepares a porous non-alkylated HPLC
`
`PSDVB column), together with additional teachings in Gjerde I, would have
`
`enabled a POSA to use the claimed methods without undue experimentation.
`
`EX1004, 1:28-32; 3:60-64; 7:24-31; 7:53-64; 13:27-31; 31:30-35. Therefore,
`
`Gjerde I anticipates claims 1-5, 8, 10-22, and 26 of the '340 patent.
`
`21. As also discussed in detail below, claims 1, 3, 4, 6-19 and 21-26 of the
`
`'340 patent would have been obvious in view of Zhang and Lloyd. Because Zhang
`
`teaches of more pre-clinical and clinical trials with antisense agents, a POSA
`
`would have had a reason to purify large quantities of RNA. EX1038, 11:1. Indeed,
`
`it was known in the art that "preparative separation methods must be created and
`
`scaled up" for "antisense discovery research and clinical development." EX1047,
`
`203:2-3. Further, the art generally taught that "kilograms are required" for clinical
`
`trials of antisense drugs, and that antisense "drug markets range from kilogram to
`
`metric ton levels." Id., 204:1. And a POSA would have known, based on general
`
`knowledge in the art, that preparative scale amounts of RNA were required for
`
`RNA based pre-clinical and clinical research because therapy in even a single
`
`patient could require doses between "0.1 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg body weight/day
`
`of active ingredients." EX1051, 94:14-21 (disclosing doses of small inhibitory
`
`- 8 -
`
`12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`RNAs); EX1049, ¶¶[204], [354]-[355] (disclosing administering "10, 30, 100, and
`
`300 mg/m2/day" of ribozymes in a Phase I/II clinical trial). A POSA would have
`
`had a reason to use the method of Lloyd to purify large quantities of antisense
`
`RNA of Zhang because Lloyd would have taught a POSA that its method was
`
`suited for purifying antisense oligonucleotides on a preparative scale. EX1005,
`
`227:1:2-2:1. And given Lloyd's teachings, and the general state of the art, a
`
`POSA would have reasonably expected that the methods of Lloyd would have
`
`been successful for purifying antisense RNA. EX1008, 1:2:1-2; Abstract;
`
`EX1006, 14:27-30; EX1015, Abstract; EX1023,110:1:3; EX 1005, 223:Abstract,
`
`225:2:1; Fig. 1; EX1024, 105:2:1. Lloyd further discloses additional details of the
`
`methods, such that together Lloyd and Zhang disclose all elements of claims 1, 3,
`
`4, 6-19 and 21-26, as discussed below. EX1005, 223:Abstract; 225:1:1; 225:2:1,
`
`226:Fig. 1.
`
`22.
`
`I also discuss in detail, below, that claim 2 of the '340 patent would
`
`have been obvious over Sullenger in view of Lloyd. Sullenger would have
`
`informed a POSA that "inexhaustible amounts" of mRNA were produced for
`
`RNA-based human immunotherapy applications. EX1039, 257:1:1; 257:1:2. And
`
`a POSA would have known that "kilogram-" to "metric ton-"scale quantity of
`
`RNA would be needed for RNA-based pre-clinical and clinical application.
`
`EX1047, 204:1; EX1051, 94:14-21; EX1049, ¶¶[204], [354]-[355]. In looking for
`
`- 9 -
`
`13
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`a method to purify large quantities of mRNA, a POSA would have looked at
`
`Lloyd because Lloyd teaches that its method is suitable for "produc[ing] large
`
`quantities of well-defined oligonucleotides in an economic and timely fashion for
`
`clinical trials." EX1005, 227:1:2-2:1. And given Lloyd's teachings, and the
`
`general state of the art, a POSA would have reasonably expected to use the
`
`methods of Lloyd for purifying mRNA of Sullenger. EX1008, 1:2:1-2; Abstract;
`
`EX1006, 14:27-30; EX1015, Abstract; EX1023,110:1:3; EX1008, Abstract;
`
`EX1005, 223:Abstract, 225:2:1; Fig. 1; EX1024, 105:2:1.
`
`23.
`
`In addition, claim 5 of the '340 patent would have been obvious in
`
`view of Zhang, Lloyd, and the 2004-2005 Polymer Laboratories Catalog. As
`
`discussed above, the teachings of Zhang would have given a POSA a reason to
`
`purify large quantities of antisense RNA. And a POSA would have had a reason to
`
`look to the method of Lloyd for this purpose, as discussed above. A POSA would
`
`have further had a reason combine the teachings of the 2004-2005 Polymer
`
`Laboratories Catalog with the teachings of Zhang and Lloyd because the 2004-
`
`2005 Polymer Laboratories Catalog also teaches that PLRP-S columns having the
`
`particle sizes that are claimed in claim 5 "are ideal for oligonucleotide analysis."
`
`EX1024, 105:1. And, given these teachings, and the general state of the art, a
`
`POSA would have reasonably expected to use the methods of Lloyd for purifying
`
`antisense RNA of Zhang. EX1008, 1:2:1-2; Abstract; EX1006, 14:27-30;
`
`- 10 -
`
`14
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`EX1015, Abstract; EX1023,110:1:3; EX1008, Abstract; EX1005, 223:Abstract,
`
`225:2:1; Fig. 1; EX1024, 105:2:1.
`
`24. Further, claim 20 of the '340 patent would have been obvious in view
`
`of Zhang, Lloyd, and Gjerde II. As discussed above, the teaching of Zhang would
`
`have given a POSA a reason to purify large quantities of antisense RNA, such as
`
`ribozyme, siRNA, and AS-ODNs. And a POSA would have had a reason to look
`
`to the method of Lloyd for this purpose, as discussed above. A POSA would have
`
`further had a reason to combine the teachings of Gjerde II to elute antisense RNA
`
`of Zhang isocratically because Gjerde II teaches that "by using a combination of
`
`gradient and isocratic elution conditions, the resolving power of a system can be
`
`enhanced for a particular size range of DNA." EX1006, 25:27-30. Additionally,
`
`given the general knowledge in the art, a POSA would have known that "for some
`
`[purification] processes, a highly precise isocratic … composition" may be
`
`required. EX1034, 9:16-21. And given Lloyd and Gjerde II's teachings of using a
`
`PSDVB column for RNA purification, and the general state of the art, a POSA
`
`would have reasonably expected to use the methods of Lloyd for purifying
`
`antisense RNA of Zhang. EX1008, 1:2:1-2; Abstract; EX1006, 14:27-30;
`
`EX1015, Abstract; EX1023,110:1:3; EX1005, 223:Abstract, 225:2:1; Fig. 1;
`
`EX1024, 105:2:1.
`
`- 11 -
`
`15
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`25.
`
`In addition, evidence of objective indicia that I reviewed does not
`
`change my opinion that claims 1-26 of the '340 patent would have been obvious to
`
`a POSA, as I explain in detail in Section VII.
`
`IV. List of Documents I Considered in Formulating My Opinions
`26.
`In formulating my opinions, I have considered all the references and
`
`documents cited herein, including those listed below.
`
`MTX
`
` Exhibit #
`
`1001
`
`1003
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`Description
`
`Ketterer, T., et al., "Method for Purifying RNA on a Preparative
`Scale By Means of HPLC," U.S. Patent No. 8,383,340 (filed on
`October 20, 2009; issued on February 26, 2013)
`Curriculum Vitae of David Peter Joseph Hornby, Ph.D.
`Gjerde, D., et al., "Method and System for RNA Analysis by
`Matched Ion Polynucleotide Chromatography," U.S. Patent No.
`6,576,133 (filed on January 2, 2001; issued on June 10, 2003)
`(Gjerde I)
`Lloyd, L, et al., "Rigid polymerics: the future of oligonucleotide
`analysis and Purification," J. Chromatogr. A 1009: 223-230 (2003)
`Gjerde, D., et al., "Polynucleotide Separations on Polymeric
`Separation Media," U.S. Patent No. 6,066,258 (filed on October 30,
`1998; issued on May 23, 2000) (Gjerde II)
`Bonn, G., et al., "Nucleic Acid Separation on Alkylated Nonporous
`Polymer Beads," U.S. Patent No. 5,585,236 (filed on November 17,
`1993; issued on December 17, 1996)
`Azarani, A. and Hecker, K.H., "RNA analysis by ion-pair reversed-
`phase high performance liquid chromatography," Nucleic Acids Res.
`29: 1-9 (2000)
`Huck, C.W., et al., "Polystyrene/Divinylbenzene Based Monolithic
`and Encapsulated Capillary Columns for the Analysis of Nucleic
`Acids by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray
`Ionization Mass Spectrometry," Eng. Life Sci. 5: 431-432 (2005)
`
`- 12 -
`
`16
`
`

`

`MTX
`
` Exhibit #
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`Description
`
`Huck, C. W. and Bonn, G.K., "Poly(Styrene-Divinylbenzene) Based
`Media for Liquid Chromatography," Chem. Eng. Technol. 28: 1457-
`1472 (2005)
`Bidlingmeyer, B. and Wang, Q., "Additives for reversed-phase
`HPLC mobile phases," U.S. Patent Application Publication No.
`2005/0011836 (filed on July 17, 2003; published on January 20,
`2005)
`Oefner, P.J. and Huber, C.G., "A decade of high-resolution liquid
`chromatography of nucleic acids on styrene–divinylbenzene
`copolymers," J. Chromatogr. B 782:27-55 (2002)
`Huber, C., et al., "Method And Apparatus For Separating
`Polynucleotides Using Monolithic Capillary Columns," WO
`2001/055713 (filed on January 25, 2001; published on August 2,
`2001)
`Viklund, C., et al., "Monolithic, 'Molded', Porous Materials with
`High Flow Characteristics for Separations, Catalysis, or Solid-Phase
`Chemistry: Control of Porous Properties during
`Polymerization," Chem. Mater. 8: 744-750 (1996)
`McFarland, G. D. and Borer, P.N., "Separation of oligo-RNA by
`reverse-phase HPLC," Nucleic Acids Res. 7: 1067-1080 (1979)
`Morgan, R.L. and Celebuski, J. E., "Large-scale purification of
`haptenated oligonucleotides using high-performance liquid
`chromatography," J. Chromatogr. 536: 85-93 (1991)
`Nielsen, M.D., et al., "High-performance liquid chromatography
`purification of 26-bp serial analysis of gene expression ditags results
`in higher yields, longer concatemers, and substantial time savings,"
`Anal. Biochem. 313: 128-132 (2003)
`Oberacher, H., "Capillary monoliths for the analysis of nucleic
`acids by high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray
`ionization mass spectrometry," Trends in Anal. Chem. 21: 166-174
`(2002)
`
`- 13 -
`
`17
`
`

`

`MTX
`
` Exhibit #
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`1029
`
`1030
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`Description
`
`Necina, R., et al., "Method And Device For Isolating And Purifying
`A Polynucleotide of Interest On A Manufacturing Scale," WO
`2003/051483 (filed on December 16, 2002; published on June 26,
`2003)
`Oberacher, H., et al., "Characterization of some physical and
`chromatographic properties of monolithic poly(styrene–co-
`divinylbenzene) columns," J. Chromatogr. A 1030: 201-208 (2004)
`File History for U.S. Patent No. 8,383,340
`Gjerde, D., et al., "Process For Performing Polynucleotide
`Separations," U.S. Patent No. 6,156,206 (filed on June 2,1999; issued
`on December 5, 2000)
`Georgopoulos, D.E. and Leibowitz, M.J., "Use of high-performance
`liquid chromatographic fractionation of large RNA molecules in the
`assay of group I intron ribozyme activity," J. Chromatogr. A 868:
`109-114 (2000)
`Chromatography Products from Polymer Laboratories, Catalog Issue
`3, 2004-2005
`Tweeten, K.A. and Tweeten, T.N., "Reversed-Phase
`Chromatography of Proteins on Resin-Based Wide-Pore Packings,"
`J. Chromatogr. 359: 111 – 119 (1986)
`Lloyd, L.L., "Rigid macroporous copolymers as stationary phases in
`high-performance liquid chromatography," J. Chromatogr. 544: 201-
`217 (1991)
`DNA Chromatography, Gjerde, Hanna and Hornby (Eds.) Wiley-
`VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA 2002
`LC GC Europe European Directory 17:124-128 (August 2004)
`Svec, F., "Chapter 2: Organic Polymer Support Materials," in HPLC
`of Biological Macromolecules, Chromatographic Sciences Series
`Volume 87, Gooding, K.M. and Regnier, F.E. (Eds.), pp. 17-48,
`Marcel Dekker, Inc. 2002
`Drager, R.R. and Regnier, F.R., "High-Performance Anion-Exchange
`Chromatography of Oligonucleotides," Anal. Biochem. 145: 47-56
`(1985)
`
`- 14 -
`
`18
`
`

`

`MTX
`
` Exhibit #
`
`1031
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`
`1035
`
`1036
`
`1037
`
`1038
`
`1039
`
`1040
`
`1041
`
`1042
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN 8,383,340
`Declaration of David Hornby, Ph.D (EX1002)
`
`Description
`
`Barik, S. and Bitko, V., "Prospects of RNA interference therapy in
`respiratory viral diseases: update 2006," Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 6:
`1151-1160 (2006)
`Putral, L.N., et al., "RNA Interference for the Treatment of Cancer,"
`Drug News Perspect. 19: 317-324 (2006)
`"Chapter 26: An Introduction to Chromatographic Separations," and
`"Chapter 28: High-Performance Liquid Chromatography," in
`Principles of Instrumental Analysis, 5th Ed., pp. 674-696, 725-765,
`Skoog, Holler and Nieman (Eds.) Saunders College Publishing 1992
`Taylor, P.D., et al., "MIPC Column Cleaning System and Process,"
`U.S. Patent No. 6,136,195 (filed April 2, 1999; published October
`24, 2000)
`Glossary from Molecular Biology of the Cell, 3rd Ed., pp. G-1 to G-
`23, Alberts et al. (Eds.) Garland Publishing 1994
`Rathore, A.S. and Velayudhan, A., "Chapter 1: An Overview of
`Scale-Up in Preparative Chromatography," in Scale -Up and
`Optimization in Preparative Chromatography, Chromatographic
`Sciences Series Volume 88, Rathore, A.S. and Velayudhan, A. (Eds.),
`pp. 5-36, Marcel Dekker, Inc. 2003
`Lloyd, L.L., et al., "Oligonucleotide analysis by anion exchange
`HPLC," Bioseparation 2: 207-215 (1991)
`Zhang, Y.C., et al., "Antisense Inhibition – Oligonucleotides,
`Ribozymes and siRNAs," in Antisense Therapeutics, 2nd Ed., Phillips
`(Eds.), pp. 11-34, Humana Press, Inc. 2005
`Sullenger, B.A. and Gilboa, E., "Emerging clinical applications of
`RNA," Nature 418: 252-258 (2002)
`Steitz, T.A. and Moore, P.B., "RNA, the first macromolecular
`catalyst: the ribosome is a ribozyme," TRENDS in Biochem. Sci. 28:
`411-418 (2003)
`Kieft, J.S. and Batey, R.T., "A general method for rapid and
`nondenaturing purification of RNAs," RNA 10: 988–995 (2004)
`Green, P., et al., "The Role of Antisense RN

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket