UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`FINJAN, Inc.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`U.S. Patent Nos 6,154,844 and 8,677,494
`
`
`DECLARATION OF INGRID HSIEH-YEE, Ph.D.
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 1
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 1
`
`

`

`I, Ingrid Hsieh-Yee, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I have been retained as an independent expert witness on behalf of
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) related to an Inter Partes Review of US. Patent Nos.
`
`6,154,844 and 8,677,494.
`
`2.
`
`I am being compensated for my work in this matter at my accustomed
`
`hourly rate of $160.00. I am also being reimbursed for reasonable and customary
`
`expenses associated with my work and testimony in this investigation. My
`
`compensation is not contingent on the results of my study, the substance of my
`
`opinions, or the outcome of this matter.
`
`3.
`
`In the preparation of this declaration I have reviewed the exhibits
`
`referenced below, each of which is a type of material that experts in my field
`
`would reasonably rely upon when forming their opinions:
`
`(l) Kerchen, P., Lo, R., Crossley, J., Elkinbard, G., & Olsson, R.
`
`(“Kerchen”), (1990, October). Static analysis virus detection tools for
`
`unix systems. In the 13th National Computer Security Conference (pp.
`
`350-365); obtained from Purdue University Library, Exhibit CS-1019;
`
`(2) Bibliographic Record for the 13th National Computer Security
`
`Conference available at https://purdue—primo-
`
`
`prod.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-
`
`
`explore/fulldisplay?docid=PURDUE_ALMA21497530410001081&cont
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 2
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 2
`
`

`

`ext=L&vid=PURDUE&lang=en_US&search scope=purdue institution
`
`scope&adaptor=Local%208earch%20Engine&tab=default tab&query=a
`
`ny,contains, l 3th%20National%20Computer%20$ecurity%20Conference
`
`&mode=Basj_c from the online catalog of Purdue University Library;
`
`Exhibit CS-1032;
`
`(3) MARC Record information for the 13th National Computer Security
`
`
`Conference available at https://purdue-primo—
`
`
`prod.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo—
`
`explore/sourceRecord?vid=PURDUE&docld=PURDUE ALMA2 14975
`
`30410001081 from the online catalog of Purdue University Library;
`
`Exhibit CS-1033;
`
`(4) Crawford, R., Lo, R., Crossley, J ., Fink, G., Kerchen, P., Ho, W., Levitt,
`
`K., Olsson, R., & Archer M. (“Crawford”). A testbed for malicious code
`
`detection: a synthesis of static and dynamic analysis techniques. In the
`
`14th Department ofEnergy Computer Security Group Conference :
`
`Concord, California, May 7-9, 1991 : "Computer security - a personal
`
`commitment" : proceedings (pp. 17-1 — 17-23); obtained from the
`
`University of Virginia (UVA); Exhibit CS-1011;
`
`(5) Bibliographic Record for the 14th Department ofEnergy Computer
`
`Security Group Conference available at
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 3
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 3
`
`

`

`https://catalog. gpo. gov/F/?func=direct&doc_number=0004073 66&local
`
`base=GPOOlPUB from the Catalog of US Government Publications
`
`(CGP); Exhibit CS- 1034;
`
`(6) MARC Record for the 14th Department ofEnergy Computer Security
`
`Group Conference available at
`
`https://catalog.gpo.gov/F/AAX9DHYKXLU2FXBPXFVS8VMVJXYD2
`
`NSNM3FSTQMDD52TRS7TGC-
`
`l9246?func=direct& doc_number=0004073 66&current_base=& format=0
`
`01 from the Catalog of US Government Publications (CGP); Exhibit
`
`CS- 1035;
`
`(7) Bibliographic Record for the 14th Department ofEnergy Computer
`
`Security Group Conference available at
`
`http://search.lib.virginia.edu/catalog/u2271252 from the online catalog of
`
`the University of Virginia Library; Exhibit CS-1036;
`
`(8) MARC Record for the 14th Department ofEnergy Computer Security
`
`Group Conference available at
`
`http://search.lib.virginia.edu/catalog/u2271252 from the online catalog of
`
`the University of Virginia Library; Exhibit CS-1037. The URL will
`
`retrieve the Bibliographic Record (CS-1036), if one selects “see more”
`
`and specifies “staff view”, the MARC Record will be displayed.
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 4
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 4
`
`

`

`4.
`
`In forming the opinions expressed within this declaration, I have
`
`considered:
`
`(1) The documents listed above;
`
`(2) The reference materials cited herein; and
`
`(3) My own academic background and professional experiences, as
`
`described below.
`
`5.
`
`My complete qualifications and professional experience are described
`
`in my curriculum vitae, a copy of which is attached as Appendix A. The following
`
`is a brief summary of my relevant qualifications and professional experience.
`
`6.
`
`I am currently a Professor in the Department of Library and
`
`Information Science at the Catholic University of America. I have experience
`
`working in an academic library, a medical library, and a legislative library and
`
`have been a professor for 27 years. I hold a Ph.D. in Library and Information
`
`Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a Masters in Library and
`
`Information Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
`
`7.
`
`I am an expert on library cataloging and classification and have
`
`published two books on this subject, Organizing Audiovisual and Electronic
`
`Resources for Access: A Cataloging Guide (2000, 2006). I teach a variety of
`
`courses in the area of information organization and access, including “Cataloging
`
`and Classification,” “Advanced Cataloging and Classification,” “Organization of
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 5
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Internet Resources,” “Internet Searches and Web Design,” “Advanced Information
`
`Retrieval and Analysis Strategies,” “Digital Content Creation and Management,”
`
`and “Information Literacy Instruction.” My research interests cover cataloging and
`
`classification, information organization, metadata, information retrieval,
`
`information architecture, digital collections, scholarly communication, digital
`
`scholarship, data management, user interaction with information systems, and
`
`others.
`
`8.
`
`I am fully familiar with a library cataloging encoding standard known
`
`as the “Machine-Readable Cataloging” standards, also known as “MARC.” The
`
`standards were developed by Henriette Avram in the 19603 for libraries to create
`
`and share bibliographic records. MARC became the national standard for sharing
`
`bibliographic data in the United States by 1971 and the international standard by
`
`1973. It is the primary metadata transmission standard for the transfer and storage
`
`of bibliographic metadata in libraries. Experts in my field would reasonably rely
`
`upon MARC records when forming their opinions.
`
`9.
`
`The MARC standards define the field designation, structure and
`
`content designation of MARC records. A MARC bibliographic record consists of
`
`fields, and each field provides specific information, such as author, about the item
`
`represented by the record. MARC uses a simple three-digit numeric code to
`
`identify each field, and most fields have field-specific indicators and subfields.
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 6
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Appendix B is a copy of Parts 7 to 10 of “Understanding MARC Bibliographic”
`
`(http://www.loc.gov/marc/umb/) from the Library of Congress that explains
`
`commonly used MARC fields. For example, the personal author of a publication is
`
`recorded in Field 100, the title is recorded in Field 245, information about the place
`
`of publication and publisher is recorded in Field 260, the physical format and
`
`characteristics of a publication are recorded in Field 300, and topical information is
`
`recorded as subject headings in Field 650 (Field 650 can be repeated to encode
`
`multiple topics).
`
`10.
`
`Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) is a global nonprofit library
`
`cooperative that manages the largest bibliographic network of the world, with more
`
`than 380 million records and 16,131 member institutions (many of which are
`
`libraries of some type) in 120 countries. OCLC was created “to establish, maintain
`
`and operate a computerized library network and to promote the evolution of library
`
`use, of libraries themselves, and of librarianship, and to provide processes and
`
`products for the benefit of library users and libraries, including such objectives as
`
`increasing availability of library resources to individual library patrons and
`
`reducing the rate of rise of library per-unit costs, all for the fundamental public
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 7
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 7
`
`

`

`purpose of furthering ease of access to and use of the ever-expanding body of
`
`worldwide scientific, literary and educational knowledge and information.”1
`
`11.
`
`OCLC members can contribute original cataloging records in MARC
`
`to the bibliographic network or derive cataloging records from existing records, an
`
`activity referred to as “copy cataloging”. When an OCLC participating institution
`
`acquires a work, it can create an original MARC record for this work in OCLC’s
`
`Connexion system (a cataloging system), and the system will automatically
`
`generate a code for the date of record creation in the yymmdd format, and add the
`
`creating library’s OCLC symbol to subfield a of Field 040. Once the MARC record
`
`is in Connexion, it becomes available to other OCLC members for adoption to
`
`their local online catalogs. The record—presented in a labeled format, not
`
`MARC—also becomes searchable and viewable on WorldCat, which is a web
`
`portal to the collections of more than 10,000 libraries worldwide.
`
`12.
`
`Library online catalogs are based on MARC records that represent
`
`their collections to help the public understand what materials are publicly
`
`accessible in those libraries. Most libraries with online catalogs have made their
`
`catalogs freely available on the Web. These online catalogs offer user-friendly
`
`1 Third Article, Amended Articles of Incorporation of OCLC Online Computer
`
`Library Center, Inc. Revised May 20, 2008
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 8
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 8
`
`

`

`search interfaces, often in the form of a single search box, to support searching by
`
`author, title, subject, keywords and other data elements. They also offer features
`
`for users to narrow their search results by language, year, format, and other
`
`elements. Many libraries display MARC records on their online catalogs with
`
`labels for the data elements to help the public interpret MARC records. Many
`
`libraries also offer an option to display MARC records in MARC fields. For
`
`publications such as monographs, after a MARC record is created and made
`
`searchable on a library catalog, it is customary library practice to have the physical
`
`volume processed for public access soon after, usually within a week.
`
`13.
`
`I am personally familiar with many online catalogs, databases, and
`
`search engines. In preparing for this declaration I used authoritative information
`
`systems such as WorldCat (http://www.worldcat.org), the Catalog of US.
`
`Government Publications (https://catalog.gpo.gov/F/) and the online catalogs of the
`
`University of Virginia (http://www.library.virginia.edu) and Purdue University
`
`(https://www.lib.purdue.edu/find/catalogs) to search for records. These records are
`
`identified and discussed in this declaration. Experts in the field would reasonably
`
`rely on the data described herein to form their opinions.
`
`Exhibit CS-1019
`
`14.
`
`Exhibit CS-1019 is a true and accurate copy of select pages of the
`
`book, the 13th National Computer Securizy Conference, Washington, DC, October
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 9
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 9
`
`

`

`1-4, 1990, “Information Systems Security, Standards—-The Key to the Future”,
`
`(“the 13’” National Computer Security Conference”), which contains the Kerchen
`
`article, that I scanned on Sept. 14, 2017. When I was asked to prepare this
`
`declaration, I searched the WorldCat (http://www.worldcat.org) for “13th National
`
`Computer Security Conference” and the search results informed me that Purdue
`
`University Library holds this publication in two volumes. Through an interlibrary
`
`loan request I obtained the physical volumes of this publication from Purdue
`
`University Library and scanned the select pages, including the Kerchen article
`
`found on pages 350-365, on Sept. 15, 2017 while the volumes were in my
`
`possession.
`
`a. Bibliographic Record and MARC Record
`
`15. Exhibit CS-1032 is a true and accurate copy of the Bibliographic Record
`
`for the 13th National Computer Security Conference, which contains the Kerchen
`
`article, which I located from the Purdue University Library online catalog at
`
`https://www.lib.purdue.edu/find/catalogs. I personally identified and located these
`
`records, which experts in my field would reasonably rely upon when forming their
`
`opinion. The display at the bottom of page 1 of Exhibit CS-1032 indicates the
`
`Mathematical Sciences library holds this publication and the volumes are on loan
`
`until 01/03/2018. This loan is the interlibrary loan I requested.
`
`10
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 10
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 10
`
`

`

`16. Exhibit CS-1033 is a true and accurate copy of the MARC record for the
`
`13th National Computer Security Conference, which contains the Kerchen article,
`
`which I located from the Purdue University Library online catalog at
`
`https://www.lib.purdue.edu/find/catalogs. I personally identified and located these
`
`records, which experts in my field would reasonably rely upon when forming their
`
`opinion. Field 008 of Exhibit CS-1033 shows the record was first created on
`
`“901012” (i.e., October 12, 1990) and subfield a of Field 040 identifies the library
`
`contributing this original record as “LCI”, the library code of the US Central
`
`Intelligence Agency, according to the Directory of OCLC Members
`
`(http://www.oclc.org/en/contacts/libraries.html). This means the MARC Record of
`
`Purdue University is a copy cataloging record based on the LCI record. Field 245
`
`identifies the title of the publication as “13th National Computer Security
`
`Conference, Omni Shoreham Hotel, Washington, DC, 1-4 October, 1990 :
`
`proceedings”, Field 260 shows this item was published in Washington, DC. by
`
`“The Institute” (i.e., the National Institute of Standards and Technology listed in
`
`Field 710) in 1990. The square brackets and question marks accompanying the
`
`three data elements of Field 260 reflect the cataloging practice to record data this
`
`way when they are not taken from the publication itself, but from outside sources
`
`such as the catalog of the US National Institute of Standards and Technology. Field
`
`300 indicates the publication consists of two volumes, Field 500 shows the title
`
`11
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 11
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 11
`
`

`

`comes from the cover of the publication, and Field 650 shows the subject of this
`
`publication is “Computer security” with a subfield V indicating it is a “Congress”
`
`(Le, a conference). This MARC record (CS-1033) makes this publication
`
`searchable at the online catalog of Purdue University Library, and users interested
`
`in this topic will be able to retrieve this publication by the subject heading listed in
`
`Field 650.
`
`17.
`
`Based on the information above, it is my opinion that the 13m
`
`National Computer Security Conference, Omni Shoreham Hotel, Washington,
`
`D. C., 1-4 October, 1990 .' proceedings which contains the Kerchen article was first
`
`cataloged on October 12, 1990, and libraries using this record for copy cataloging
`
`made the physical volume available for public access soon after the copy cataloged
`
`MARC records were added to their systems, as Purdue University Library did.
`
`18. Actual usage of the Kerchen article (CS-1019) contained in the 13:};
`
`National Computer Security Conference, Omni Shoreham Hotel, Washington,
`
`D. C., 1-4 October, 1990 .' proceedings is reflected by articles that make reference
`
`to it. The citation history found in Google Scholar shows the Kerchen article has
`
`been cited 21 times. Four citing papers published in the early 19905 are
`
`(1) Porras, P. A. (1992). A state transition analysis tool for intrusion
`
`detection. Master ’s thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.
`
`12
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 12
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 12
`
`

`

`(2) King, M. M. (1991, October). Identifying and controlling undesirable
`
`program behaviors. In Proceedings of the 14th National Computer Security
`
`Conference (pp. 283—294).
`
`(3) Voas, J. M., Payne, J. E., & Cohen, F. B. (1993). A model for detecting
`
`the existence of software corruption in real time. Computers & Security,
`
`12(3), 275-283.
`
`(4) Voas, J. M., & Cohen, F. B. (1992). A model for detecting the existence
`
`of unknown computer Viruses in real-time. In Proc. 5th International
`
`Computer Virus & Security Conference.
`
`19.
`
`Taken together, the Bibliographic Record, the MARC Record, and
`
`the citations support my opinion that the Kerchen article (CS-1019) was publicly
`
`accessible as early as October 1991 when the first citing paper was published or
`
`soon after the original MARC record was created in October 1990.
`
`Exhibit CS-1011
`
`20.
`
`Exhibit CS—1011 is a true and accurate copy of select pages of the
`
`microfiche copy of the book, the I 4m Department ofEnergy Computer Security
`
`Group Conference: Concord, California, May 7-9, 199], Computer Security- A
`
`Personal Commitment (“14th Department ofEnergy Computer Security Group
`
`Conference”) that contains the Crawford article. When I was asked to prepare this
`
`declaration, I searched the Catalog of the US Government Publications (CGP) on
`
`13
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 13
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 13
`
`

`

`the Internet because the item is a government publication. The search results
`
`inform me that the publication was distributed to depository libraries in microfiche,
`
`so I requested the microfiche through an interlibrary loan service. I received a
`
`microfiche copy of the 14th Department ofEnergy Computer Security Group
`
`Conference from the University of Virginia Library on Sept. 12, 2017 and used the
`
`microfiche reader/scanner of my university to scan select pages, including the
`
`Crawford article found on page 17-1 to page 17-23. The microfiche envelope has a
`
`date stamp “Sep 28 ‘92” (i.e., September 28, 1992) for the date of receipt and the
`
`number “92-2142” which is the Shipping list number.
`
`a. Bibliographic Record and MARC Record - GPO
`
`21. Exhibit CS— 1034 is a true and accurate copy of the Bibliographic Record
`
`for the 14th Department ofEnergy Computer Security Group Conference :
`
`Concord, California, May 7-9, 1991 .' "Computer security - a personal
`
`commitment" .' proceedings, which contains the Crawford article, that I retrieved
`
`on August 31, 2017 from the Catalog of US Government Publications (CGP). I
`
`personally identified and located these records, which experts in my field would
`
`reasonably rely upon when forming their opinion. The Bibliographic Record
`
`identifies “14th Department ofEnergy Computer Security Group Conference .'
`
`Concord, California, May 7—9, 1991 .' ”Computer security - a personal
`
`commitment" .' proceedings ” as the title, “E 1.10:9105126” as the SuDoc Number
`
`14
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 14
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 14
`
`

`

`(the Superintendent of Documents Classification Number), “0429-E(MF)” as the
`
`item number, a note indicating “distributed to depository libraries in microfiche”
`
`and another note showing the shipping list number as “92-2142—M”.
`
`22.
`
`Exhibit CS- 1035 is a true and accurate copy of the MARC record for
`
`the 14th Department ofEnergy Computer Security Group Conference .' Concord,
`
`California, May 7—9, 199] .' ”Computer security - a personal commitment" .'
`
`proceedings, which contains the Crawford article, that I retrieved on September 1,
`
`2017 from the Catalog of US Government Publications (CGP). I personally
`
`identified and located these records, which experts in my field would reasonably
`
`rely upon when forming their opinion. Field 008 of the MARC record shows the
`
`record was created on “931203” (i.e., December 3, 1993) and Field 005 shows the
`
`record was last modified on “19931203” (i.e., December 3, 1993). Subfield a of
`
`Field 040 identifies “GPO” as the library contributing the original record.
`
`According to the Directory of OCLC Members, GPO is the library symbol for the
`
`US Government Publishing Office. The title in Field 245 of the MARC record
`
`matches the title on the title page I scanned from the UVA microfiche (CS-1011).
`
`Field 260 shows the item was published in Washington, DC. by the Department of
`
`Energy, and available from the National Technical Information Service in 1991.
`
`The year of publication is entered in square brackets because the information is
`
`taken from an outside source. “CONF-9105126” in Field 500 matches the number
`
`15
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 15
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 15
`
`

`

`on the microfiche. The number in Field 086 for SuDoc Number, “E
`
`1.10:9105126”, also matches the number on the microfiche. Two notes in Field
`
`500 indicate the publication was “distributed to depository libraries in microfiche”
`
`and the shipping number was “92-2142-M”.
`
`23.
`
`The Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP) was created by
`
`Congress according to The Depository Library Act of 1962 “to ensure that the
`
`American public has access to its Government’s information. GPO administers the
`
`FDLP on behalf of the participating libraries and the public”. There are over 1,250
`
`depository libraries and these libraries are required to offer free, public access to
`
`depository collections. The FDLP program and the record creation date of the GPO
`
`MARC record inform me that this publication became widely disseminated and
`
`available at depository libraries soon after the GPO MARC record was created on
`
`December 3, 1993.
`
`b. Bibliographic Record and MARC Record - UVA
`
`24.
`
`Exhibit CS-1036 is a true and accurate copy of the Bibliographic
`
`Record for the 14th Department ofEnergy Computer Security Group Conference .'
`
`Concord, California, May 7-9, 1991 : "Computer security - a personal
`
`commitment” .' proceedings, which contains the Crawford article, that I first
`
`retrieved on September 6, 2017 from the online catalog of the University of
`
`Virginia Library. I personally identified and located these records, which experts in
`
`16
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 16
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 16
`
`

`

`my field would reasonably rely upon when forming their opinion. The copy was
`
`produced on Sept. 14, 2017 for this declaration. The availability area shows the
`
`microfiche is located on the 3rd floor East Reading Room of the Alderman Library,
`
`available, “non-circ.” (non-circulating), and the call number is “E 1.10:9105126”.
`
`Although the item is marked as non-circulating in the Bibliographic Record, UVA
`
`is able to loan it to other libraries with the stipulation that the item cannot be used
`
`outside a library. It is for this reason that when I received the UVA microfiche I
`
`had to use it inside our library.
`
`25.
`
`Exhibit CS- 1037 is a true and accurate copy of the MARC record for
`
`the 14th Department ofEnergy Computer Security Group Conference : Concord,
`
`California, May 7-9, 1991 .' "Computer security - a personal commitment" .'
`
`proceedings, which contains the Crawford article, that I first retrieved on
`
`September 6, 2017 from the online catalog of the University of Virginia Library. I
`
`personally identified and located these records, which experts in my field would
`
`reasonably rely upon when forming their opinion. The copy was produced on
`
`September 14, 2017 for this declaration. Field 008 of the MARC record shows it
`
`was created by on “931203” (i.e., December 3, 1993) by the GPO (Field 040). The
`
`holding library’s symbol, “VAMM”,
`
`is entered in Field 049. This means the UVA
`
`record was based on the original record created by the GPO. Two notes in Field
`
`500 indicate the publication was “distributed to depository libraries in microfiche”
`
`17
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 17
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 17
`
`

`

`and the shipping number was “92-2142-M”. The University of Virginia is a
`
`Congressionally designated depository for US. Government documents.
`
`26.
`
`Taken together, the Bibliographic Records and MARC Records from
`
`GPO and UVA, the microfiche from UVA, and the date stamp on the microfiche
`
`envelope support my opinion that the 14th Department ofEnergy Computer
`
`Security Group Conference .' Concord, California, May 7-9, 1991 .' ”Computer
`
`security - a personal commitment” .' proceedings, which contains the Crawford
`
`article, was received at UVA as early as September 1992 and became publicly
`
`available no later than December 3, 1993 when GPO created the original MARC
`
`record and enabled depository libraries to make the publication available to the
`
`public.
`
`27.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein on my own knowledge are
`
`true, and further, that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful
`
`false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or
`
`both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`
`
`18
`
`CS—1027
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 18
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 18
`
`

`

`
`
`APPENDIX A
`
`
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 19
`
`

`

`
`
`Ingrid Hsieh-Yee
`Professor
`Dept. of Library and Information Science
`Catholic University of America
`Washington, D.C. 20064
`E-mail: hsiehyee@cua.edu
`Phone: (202) 319-5085
`Fax: (202) 319-5574
`
`
`Education
`
`Ph.D. Library and Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison
`
`Minors: Sociology and Psychology
`
`M.A. Library and Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
`
`M.A. Comparative Literature, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
`
`B.A. Foreign Languages and Literature, National Taiwan University.
`
`
`Work Experience
`
`Professor, School/Dept. of Library and Information Science, Catholic University of America,
`2004- (Assistant Professor, 1990-1996; Associate Professor, 1997-2004)
`
`
`Co-Chair, Dept. of Library and Information Science, Catholic University of America, June 2015-
`August 2016.
`
`
`Acting Dean, School of Library and Information Science, Catholic University of America,
`January 2010-June 2012.
`
`
`Cataloger, Dept. of Legislative Reference Library, Annapolis, Maryland, 1989-1990.
`
`Lecturer, School of Library and Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1988.
`
`Teaching Assistant, School of Library and Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-
`Madison, 1986-1988.
`
`
`Cataloger, Health Sciences Library, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1984-1986.
`
`Areas of Teaching and Research Interests
`
`Information Organization and Access; Metadata; Cataloging & Classification; Information
`Architecture; Information Retrieval; Digital Collections; Scholarly Communication; Information
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 20
`
`

`

`
`Behavior; Health Informatics; Human Computer Interaction; Usability Studies
`
`Grants & Honors
`
`Cultural Heritage Information Management Project. IMLS grant. Amount: $498,741. Period:
`Aug. 2012 to July 2015. Co-PI with Dr. Youngok Choi.
`
`2
`
`
`D.C. Health Information Technology (HIT4): Building Capacity & Providing Access in Our
`Nation’s Capital. Dept. of Labor H2B Training Grant. Grant amount: $4,175,500. Grant
`period: Nov. 2011 to Dec. 2015. Partner with the Metropolitan School of Professional
`Studies of the Catholic University of America, Children’s National Medical Center, D.C.
`Department of Employment Services, Holy Cross Hospital, Howard University, Center
`for Urban Progress, Providence Hospital, and Sibley Memorial Hospital.
`
`
`Capital Health Careers Project. Department of Labor Healthcare Sector and Other High Growth
`and Emerging Industries Grant. Grant amount: $4,953,999. Grant period: March 2010 –
`February 2013. Awarded to a group of healthcare organizations and educational
`institutions in Washington, D.C. Providence Health Foundation of Providence Hospital
`(Lead institution). Part of the grant supported the development of a Master’s degree
`program in Information Technology with a concentration in Health Information
`Technology offered by the School of Library and Information Science.
`
`
`The Washington D.C. School Librarians Project. IMLS grant. Grant amount: $412,660. Grant
`period: Aug. 2007 – June 2011. The School partnered with the District of Columbia
`Public Schools (DCPS) and the District of Columbia Library Association to educate and
`mentor school media specialists for the DCPS system. PI, Jan. 2010 to June 2011.
`
`
`SIG Member of the Year, American Society for Information Science and Technology (2009).
`
`Most Outstanding Paper of OCLC Systems & Services (2001).
`
`ALISE Research Grant (2001).
`
`Most Outstanding Paper of OCLC Systems & Services (2000).
`
`Research Grant from ERIC (1999-2000).
`
`Best Research Paper Award; Association for Library and Information Science Education (1998).
`
`Research Grants, Catholic University of America. 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2004,
`2005, 2006, 2007, 2013-14.
`
`
`Cooperative Faculty Research Grant, Consortium of Universities in the Washington
`Metropolitan Area (1993-1994).
`
`
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 21
`
`

`

`3
`
`
`Cooperative Research Grant, Council on Library Resources (1993-1994).
`
`Journal of the American Society for Information Science Best Paper Award (1993).
`
`ASIS/ISI Information Science Doctoral Dissertation Scholarship (1989).
`
`HEA Title IIB Fellowship (Dept. of Education) (1989)
`
`Chinese-American Librarians Association Scholarship (1987).
`
`Beta Phi Mu (1985).
`
`Vilas Fellowship, University of Wisconsin-Madison. 1984
`
`
`Publications
`
`Choi, Y., and Hsieh-Yee, I. (2010). Finding Images in an OPAC: Analysis of User Queries,
`Subject Headings, and Description Notes. Canadian Journal of Information and Library
`Science, 34(3): 271 – 295.
`
`
`Hsieh-Yee, I. (2008). Educating Cataloging Professionals in a Changing Information
`Environment. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 46(2): 93-106.
`
`
`Vellucci, S. L., Hsieh-Yee, I., and Moen, W.E. (2007). The Metadata Education and Research
`Information Commons (MERIC): A Collaborative Teaching and Research Initiative.
`Education for Information, 25(3&4): 169-178.
`
`
`NISO Framework for Guidelines for Building Good Digital Collections. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD:
`National Information Standards Organization, 2007. Also available online:
`http://www.niso.org/framework/framework3.pdf (NISO Working Group members:
`Priscilla Caplan (chair), Grace Agnew, Murtha Baca, Tony Gill, Carl Fleischhauer, Ingrid
`Hsieh-Yee, Jill Koelling, and Christie Stephenson.)
`
`
`Choi, Y., Hsieh-Yee, I., and Kules, B. (2007). Retrieval Effectiveness of TOC and LCSH.
`Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 233-234.
`
`
`Vellucci, S., and Hsieh-Yee, I. (2007). They Didn’t Teach Me That in Library School! Building
`a Digital Teaching Commons to Enhance Metadata Teaching, Learning and Research.
`Proceedings of the National Conference of the Association of College and Research
`Libraries, Baltimore, MD, pp. 26-31.
`
`
`Mitchell, Vanessa, and Ingrid Hsieh-Yee. (2007). Converting Ulrich’s Subject Headings to
`FAST Headings: A Feasibility Study. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 45(1): 59-
`85.
`
`CS-1027
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc.
`Page 22
`
`

`

`
`
`Hsieh-Yee, I., Tang, R., and Zhang, S. (2007). User Perceptions of a Federated Search System.
`IEEE Technical Committee on Digital Libraries Bulletin, Summer 3(2) (URL =
`http://www.ieee-tcdl.org).
`
`4
`
`
`Tang, R., Hsieh-Yee, I., and Zhang, S. (2007). User Perceptions of MetaLib Combined Search:
`An Investigation of How Users Make Sense of Federated Searching." Internet Reference
`Services Quarterly, 12(12): 211-236.
`
`
`Hsieh-Yee, I., Tang, R., and Zhang, S. (2006). User Perceptions of a Federated Search System.
`Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, June 11-15, 2006, Chapel Hill,
`p. 338.
`
`
`Hsieh-Yee, I. (2006). Organizing Audiovisual and Electronic Resources for Access: A
`Cataloging Guide. 2nd ed. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlim