throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper No. 7
`Entered: February 8, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-02154 (Patent 6,154,844)
`Case IPR2017-02155 (Patent 8,677,494 B2)
`____________
`
`
`Before ZHENYU YANG, CHARLES J. BOUDREAU, and
`SHEILA F. McSHANE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BOUDREAU, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`A conference call was held in the above-referenced proceedings on
`February 6, 2018, between counsel for the parties and Judges Boudreau,
`Yang, and McShane, to discuss a request by Petitioner for authorization to
`file a motion for leave to file replies to Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Responses (IPR2017-02154, Paper 6; IPR2017-02155, Paper 6). After
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-02154 (Patent 6,154,844)
`Case IPR2017-02155 (Patent 8,677,494 B2)
`
`hearing from the parties, the panel authorized Petitioner to file a five-page
`reply to Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response in Case IPR2017-02155,
`limited to addressing Patent Owner’s arguments regarding the application to
`that case of the Board’s decision in General Plastic Industrial Co., Ltd. v.
`Canon Kabushiki Kaisha, IPR2016-01357 (PTAB Sept. 6, 2017) (Paper 19),
`a portion of which was designated as precedential after the filing of the
`Petition but before the filing of the Preliminary Response. The panel also
`authorized Patent Owner to file a five-page sur-reply responsive to
`Petitioner’s reply. The panel, however, denied Petitioner’s request for
`authorization to file a reply to Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response in Case
`IPR2017-02154.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Petitioner is authorized to file a reply to Patent
`Owner’s Preliminary Response (Paper 6) in Case IPR2017-02155, not to
`exceed five pages in length, by February 13, 2018, limited to addressing
`Patent Owner’s arguments therein regarding the application of General
`Plastic to that case;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is authorized to file a
`sur-reply, not to exceed five pages in length, by February 20, 2018, limited
`to responding to Petitioner’s reply; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that no reply to Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response (Paper 6) in Case IPR2017-02154 is authorized.
`
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-02154 (Patent 6,154,844)
`Case IPR2017-02155 (Patent 8,677,494 B2)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Patrick D. McPherson
`Patrick Muldoon
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`PDMcPherson@duanemorris.com
`PCMuldoon@duanemorris.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`James Hannah
`Jeffrey H. Price
`Michael Lee
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`jprice@kramerlevin.com
`mhlee@kramerlevin.com
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket