throbber
_
`
`'
`
`a
`
`.
`
`f7" '55“ #:434- ‘
`
`‘ Q! .
`
`BIOEPIS EX. 1022
`
`Page 1
`
`BIOEPIS EX. 1022
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Nawre V ol. 256 August 7 / Y7 5
`
`Vol. 256 No. 5517
`
`August 7, 1.975
`
`0 Macmillan Journals Ltd 1975
`Published weekly
`ISSN 0028-0836
`Registered as a newspaper at the
`British Post Office
`London
`4 Little Essex Street, WC2R 3LF
`Telephone: (01) 836 6633 Telex: 262024
`Telegrams: Phusis London WC2R 3LF
`Washington
`711 National Press Building, DC 20045
`Telephone: (202) 7372355
`Telex: 64280
`
`Editor
`l)a vid Davies
`Deputy Editor
`Roger Woodham
`
`Editorial Staff
`Gillian Boucher Peter Newmark
`John Gribbin Colin Norman•
`•sandy Grimwade Allan Piper
`John Hall Miranda Robertson
`Eleanor Lawrence Fiona Selkirk
`Mary Lindley Hilary Taphouse
`Peter Milford Robert Vickers
`Mary Wade•
`•Washington offic;e
`Publishing Director
`Jenny Hughes
`
`Display advertisement enquiries to:
`London Office
`or to
`James Buckley Associates.
`P.O. Box 209, Industrial Way,
`Wilmington. Mass. 018&7.
`Telephone: (617) 658 51 10
`
`Classified advertisement enquiries to:
`T. G. Scott and Son Ltd,
`l Clement's Inn.
`London WC2A 2ED
`Telephone: (01 ) 242 6264 and
`(01) 405 4743
`Telegrams: Textualist London
`WC2A 2ED
`
`Subscription enquiries to:
`Macmillan Jo urnals Ltd, Brunei Road,
`Basingstoke, Rants, RG21 2XS
`Telephone: Basingstoke 29242
`
`Price
`
`UK
`Aus!ralia
`Surface Europe
`moil
`Japan
`{
`USA
`Europe
`Airmail Rest of wt>rld Full
`{
`Personal
`
`£JS
`AS58
`£>5
`Y24.SOO
`USS'lS
`(40
`USSII8
`USSIOJ
`
`US Postmascer, please send Corm 3579 to N;nurt,
`7 11 Natio nal Press Building, Washington OC2004S
`
`Application to nl3.11 at second-class postugerate
`is pendina ot New York, NY.
`US m3ifinK DR;cnt is :
`
`Air ancJ Sea Freighl Tnc.,
`S27 MBdison AVenue,
`New York, NY 10022
`
`Cover picture
`Oeser! locusts settle for the nj~ht.
`See pages 484. 48$.
`Photo: Jean Ma nuel, FAO Rome.
`
`Volume 256
`
`Whitlam, Connor and Cameron
`INTERNATIONAL l'"'EWS
`NEWS AND VlEWS
`
`August 7
`
`1975
`
`REVIEW ARTICLE
`T he origin of nuclei and of eukaryotic cells T. Cm'filier-Smirh
`
`ARTICLES
`Palaeolithic remains at the Hadur in the Afar region-G. Con•i!rus
`Integration of viral genomes- V. J\11. Zltdtmov
`
`LETrERS 1'0 NATUJlE
`Definition of 'charge on an atom' and nuture of the inductive effect(cid:173)
`S. M . Dealt rmd W. G'. Richards
`A low velocity zone underlying a fast-spreading rise crest-J. Orcutt,
`B. Ke1mett, L. Dorma11 1md W. Prothero
`Mercury contamination in a 54-m core from Jake Huleh-U. M . Cowgill
`A resonant point absorber of ocean-wave power- K. Budar and J. Fa!J1es
`Climatic reversal in northern North Atlantic- R. R. Dickson, H . H. Lamb,
`S.·A . Malmbgrg and J. M. Colebrook
`Americium 242rn in nuclear test debris-V. T. Bowen and H. D. Livingston
`Tree remuins in southern Pennine peats- J. H . Tallis
`Regularities in duration of regional desert locust plagues- Z. Waloff and S. M. Gr~en
`Development of a desert locust plague-L. V. Bennell
`Seed-borne microorganisms stimulate seedcorn maggot egg laying(cid:173)
`C. J. Eckenrode, G. E. Harmanmtd D. R. Webb
`Defensive stoning by baboons-W. J. Hamilto11 Ill, R. E. Ouskirk and W H. Buskirk
`Eccentricity-specific dissociation of vi~ual functions in patients with lesions of the
`centro! visual pathways-E. Poppe!, D. vo11 CralrtOII o11d !{. Backmrmd
`Evidence for visual function mediated by anomalous projection in goldfish(cid:173)
`D. Yager a111i S. C. Sharma
`Thymus rudiment of the nthyrnic n ude mouse-M. Holub, P. Rossman11,
`H . Tfaskalova and H. Vidmarava
`Stria ted muscle fibres difTerentiate in monolayer cultures of adult thymus reticulum(cid:173)
`H. Wekerle. 8. Pttterson, U.·P. Ketelsen and M. Feldman
`Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity(cid:173)
`G. Koltler rmd C. Milstein
`Naturally occurring cytoto.~ic tumour reactive ami bodies directed against type C viral
`envelope antigents-S. £. Martin a11d W. J . Martin
`Antigen formation in metal contact sensitivity-f. M. Jones and H. E. Amos
`Induced thermal resistance in Hel a cells-E. W. Gerner and M. J. S ch11eider
`Regional turnover and synthesis of catecholarnines in rat hypothalamus(cid:173)
`D. fl. G. Ver.lteeg, J. wm der Gngren and J . 1\1. van Ree
`Rate of nucleologenesis as a measure of g~:ne activity-C. de Ia Torre,
`M. £. Fel'ltlllidn-Gomez and G. G'imenez-f,<fartill
`-5S RNA secondary structure- G. E. Fox and C. R. Woese
`Diffcrenrial effect of plasma fractions from normal and tumour-bearing rats on
`nuclear RNA restriction-D. £. Schumm and T. E. Webh
`Early role during r.hemical evolution for cytochrome P4SO in mcygen detoxilication
`R. H. lflickrvmosinglre ami C. A. Vil/ee
`Human embryonic hacmoglobins including a comparison by homology of the
`· human ~and n chains- H. Kamu:ora tmd H. Leltmamt
`Lycorine as 3n inhibitor of ascorbic acid biosynthesis-a. Arrigoni,
`R. A . Lisa und G'. Calabrese
`lntracellular killing of Listeria monocytogenes by activated macrophagcs (Mackancss
`system) is due to antibiotic- ?. Cole a11d J. Brostoff.
`
`447
`448
`455
`
`463
`
`468
`47l
`
`473
`
`41S
`476
`478
`
`479
`482
`482
`484
`486
`
`487
`488
`
`489
`
`490
`
`491
`
`493
`
`495
`
`498
`499
`500
`
`SOl
`
`S03
`505
`
`S08
`
`509
`
`511
`
`513
`
`SIS
`
`BIOEPIS EX. 1022
`Page 2
`
`

`

`495
`
`The protein sc.:rctcd ( M 0 PC 21) •~ ·n I gG 1 ( 1\) ·.vhich has been
`f~lly scQuenc.:cd' · 1
`. ~qu?l nu~1bers o r cel:s from each parental
`line were fused usmg ma.;:uvatcd Sena.,; virus• and samples
`contining 2 J( 10' cells \\ere gr0 11 n in seketive medium in
`sep:1ratc dbhes. Four out of ren disbes shOI\•d Krowth in
`selective medium and these were taken as indepenue,,: "-tb~lu
`lines, probably derived from single fusion events. The karyotype
`of the hybrid cells after 5 months in culture \\US just under the
`sum of the two parental lines (Table !).',Figure 1 shows the
`isoelectric focusi ng 10 {IEf) pattern of the secreted products of
`difl'erent lines./The hybrid cells (samples c-h in Fig. I) give a
`much more complex pattern than either parent (a and b) or a
`mixture of the parental lines (m). The important feature of the
`new p:lttern is the presence of extra bands (fig. I, arrows).
`T hese new bands, however, do not seem to be the result of
`diO'erences in primary structure; this is indicated by the IEF
`pattern of the products after reduction to separate the heavy
`and light chains (Fig. I B). The IEF pattern of chains of the
`hybrid clones {Fig. 1 B, g ) is equivalent to the sum of the lEF
`pattern (a and b) of chains o f the parental clones with no
`evidence of extra products. We conclude that, as previously
`shown with interspecies hybrids'·', new lg molecules are
`produced as a result of mixed nssociation between heavy and
`light chains from the two parents. This process is intracellular
`as a mixed cell population does not give rise to such hybrid
`molecules (compare m and g , Fig. I A). The individual cells must
`therefore be able .to ·express both isotypes. T his result shows
`that in hybrid cells the expression of one isotype and idiotype
`does not exclude the expr('SSion of another : both heavy chain
`
` \Cttw<' Vol. !j6 ...1 u~usr 7 1\175
`L--·
`1 i Continuous cultures of fused cells
`\ 5ecrding antibody of predefined specificity
`l fll• r .anufa~:ture of predefined specitic antibodies by means of
`:L ~rr.; Jnent tissue culture cell lin~s is of general interest. There
`:r. at present a considerable number of perman.:nt cultures of
`
`1:
`
`I ~cloiT'a cells'· 2 and screeni:lg procedures h;>ve been used to
`
`lr~>eal antibody activitY. in some of them. This, however, is
`:111 a satisfactory source of monoclonal anti bodies of predefined
`,"ecificity. We describe here the derivation of a number of
`• ,;;sue culture cell lines which secrete anti-sheep red blood
`,~11 (SRBC) antibodies. The cell lines are made by fusion of a
`1nouse myeloma and mouse spleen cells from an immunised
`dl)nor. To understand the expression and interactions of the
`Jg chains from the parental lines, fusion experiments between
`1110 known mouse myeloma lines were carried out.
`Each immunoglobulin chain result~ from the integratl!d
`!·.pression of one of several V and C ge.aes coding respectively
`iJr its variable and constant sections. Each cell expresses only
`on(. of the two possible alleles (allelic exclusion; reviewed in
`ref. 3). When two antibody-producing cells are fused, the
`1 products· of both parental lines are expressed•·•, and although
`rh~ light and heavy chains of both parental lines are randomly
`JOined, no evidence of scrambling of V and C sections is
`Jb.ened'. These results, obtained in an heterologous system
`IDIO)ving cells of rat and mouse origin, have now been con·
`tinned by fusing two. myeloma cells of the same mouse strain,
`
`A
`•
`
`I
`
`Chains
`
`• • ._..-~._ -
`
`H(P3)
`
`. . .
`
`L(P3)
`
`L(Pl) r
`. ' ' -- ' -
`
`Fig. I Auaoradiograph of labelled compo(cid:173)
`nents secreted by the parentalnnd hybrid cell
`lines analysed by IEF before (A) and after
`reduction (8). Cells were i n~ubatcd in the
`presence of 11C-Iysine11 and the supernatant
`applied on polyacrylamide slabs. A. pH range
`6.0 (bonom) to 8.0 (top) in 4 M urea. B, pH
`range 5.0 (bottom) to 9.0 (top) in 6 M urea;
`the supernatant was incubated for 20 min at
`37 •c in the presence of 8 M urea, 1.5 M
`mercaptoelhanol and 0.1 M potassium phos(cid:173)
`phate pH 8.0 before being applied to the right
`slab. Supernatants from parental cell lines
`in: a, PI Bu I ; b, P3-X67 AgS ; and m, millture
`of equal number of PI But and PJ-X67Ag8
`cells. Supemiltants from two independently
`derived hybrid lines are shown: .:-[, four
`subclones from Hy-3; g and h, two subclones
`from Hy-B. Fusion was carried out•·• using
`to• cells of each parental line and 4,000
`haemagglulination units inactivated Sendai
`virus (Searle). Cells were davaoe<i into ten
`equal samples and grown separat;!y i:J
`selet:tive medium (HAT medium, ref. 6).
`Medium was changed every 3 d. Successful
`hybrid lines were obtained in four of the cul(cid:173)
`tures, and all gave similar JEF panerns. Hy-B
`and Hy-3 were further cloned in soft agar".
`L, Light ; H, heilvy .
`
`..
`!_, H(Pl)/ 1
`.
`~ -ta=:;i;
`. -
`
`. <
`'
`4. ._.·,
`... . . . ~~ ... .,.. 1 ,_
`_;
`.. ,....
`.. ;.
`.
`-·
`
`•
`
`-
`
`~
`
`I
`
`I.
`
`e m f m g
`
`b
`
`.....
`a h b g
`
`{l
`
`d provide the background for the derivation and under·
`
`~
`j
`\ ,~~nding of antibody-secreting hybrid linc:s in whit:h one of
`
`1:"~: parental cells is an antibody-producing spleen ct:ll.
`f,vo myeloma cell lines of BALB/c origin were used. PI Bul
`11 resi:;tant to :i-bromo-2'-dcoxyuridine•, does not grow in
`!elective medium (HAT, ref. 6) and secretes a myeloma protein,
`.\•li PCS, which is a n lgG2/\ (K), (ref. 1). Synthesis is not
`~lan~~d and free light chains arc also secreted. The wcond
`~~·1 line, PJ-X6JAg::l, prepan:d from P3 ccJb!, i~ resis tant to
`)) ~1g mt - • S-aw guani ne and ttoc~ not grow :n HI\ T medium.
`
`1
`
`:sotypes (yl and y2a) and both V" a nd bo th VL regions
`·(idiotypes) are expressed. There are no allotypic markers for
`the C K region to provide direct proof for the expression of both
`par.::ntal C K regions. Out this is indicated by the phenotypic
`lia.k between the Vand C regions.
`Fi11ure lA shows that clones derived from different hybridi(cid:173)
`satio~ experiments and from subclones of one line are indistin·
`guishable. This has also been observ.:d in other experiments
`(data not shown). Variants \\ere. however, found in a survey of
`JOO subcloncs. The dill'.:rence is o ften associated with changes
`
`BIOEPIS EX. 1022
`Page 3
`
`

`

`NoturC' Vol. 256 All;i lllt 7 l'ii.'
`
`Fig. 2 Jsolatiun of an ami-SRBC antibc~v.
`secreting cell cl(lne. Activity wns re' ea:cct 6,
`a halo of hacmolyscd SRBC. Dir.:ct plaq~~
`given by: a. 6,0ll0 hybrid cells Sp-l ; 1>, cl<n..,
`grown in soft agar from an inoculum or 2,111..-.:
`Sp-1 cells: c. recloning of one of the positi~t
`clones Sp-1/7; d, higher magnification or a
`positive clone. Myeloma cells (10' P3-X67A
`g8) were fused to 10' spleen cells from 'In
`immunised BALB/c mou;e. Mice were im(cid:173)
`munised by intraperitoneal injection of0.2ml
`packed SRBC diluted 1:10, boosted afler 1
`month ami the spleens collected 4 d lat~r.
`After fusion, cells (Sp-1) were grown for 8 d
`in HAT medium, changed at 1- 3 d intervals.
`Cells were then grown in Dulbecco modified
`Eagle's medium, supplemented for 2 week1
`with hypoxanthine and thymidine. Forty day~
`after fusion the presence of anti-SRBC act.
`ivity was revealed as shown in a. The rotio o(
`plaque forming cells/total number of hybrid
`cells was 1/30. This hybrid cell population
`was cloned in soft agar (50% cloning ef.
`ficiency). A modified plaque assay was used to
`reveal positive clones shown inb-das follows.
`When cell clones had reached a suitable site,
`they were overlaid in sterile conditiom witll
`2 ml 0.6% agarose in phosphate-buffeR(}
`saline containing 25 111 packed SRBC and
`0.2 ml fresh guinea pig serum (absorbed with
`SRBC) as source of complement. b. Taken
`after overnight incubation at 37 •c. The ratio
`of positive/total nwnber of clones was 1/33. A
`suitable positive clone was pick.ed out and
`grown in suspension. Th.is clone was called
`Sp-1/7, and was recloned as shown inc: over
`90:1. oft he clones gave positive lysis. A second •
`experiment in which 106 P3- X67Ag8cellswcre
`fus~d with 10• spleen cells was the source or
`a clone giving rise to indirect plaques (clone
`Sp-2/3-3). Indirect plaques were produced by
`the addition of I :20 sheep anti·MOPC 21
`antibody to the agarose overlay,
`
`assays13 have been used to detect specific clones and represenla·
`tive clones o f both types have been characterised and studied.
`T he derived lines (Sp hybrids) are hybrid cell lines for the
`following reasons. T hey grow in selective medium. Their
`karyotype after 4 months in culture (Table l) is a little
`.nailer
`!han the sum of the two parental lines but more than twice the
`chromosome number of normal BALB/c cells, indicating that
`the lines are not the result of fusion between spleen cells. Io
`addition the lines contain a metaccntric chromosome also
`present in the parental P3-X67Ag8. Finally, the secreted
`immunoglobulins contain MOPC 2 L protein in addition to new,
`unknown components. T he latter presumably represent the
`chains derived from the specific anti-SR BC antibody. Figure JA
`stwws the JEF pattern of the material secreted by rwo such
`Sp hybrid clones. The IEF bands derived from the parental Pl
`line are visible in the pallern of the hybrid cells, althougb
`obscured by the presence of a number of new bands. TJ:c
`pattern is very complex, but the complexity of hybrids of thiS
`type is likely to result from the random recombination or
`chains (see above, Fig. 1). Indeed, IEF patterns of the reduced
`material secreted by t he spleen- PJ hybrid clones gave a simpler
`pattern of lg chains. The heavy and light chains o f the P3
`pa rental line became prominent, a nd new bands were apparent.
`Th<! hybrld Sp-1 gave direct plaques and this suggested t~al
`it produces an lg M antibody. This is confirmed in Fig. 4 whiCh
`shows the inhibition of SRBC lysis by a specific anti-IgM
`
`Table I Number of chromosomes in parental and hybrid cdl lines
`
`55
`65
`
`
`
`r
`9
`~~
`
`Cell line
`P3-X67Ag8
`PI Bul
`Mou~espleen cells
`Hy-B(PI - PJ)
`Sp-1/7-2
`Sp-Z/l-3
`
`Numbet' of chromo;,on1es per cell
`66,65,65,65,65
`Ref. 4
`
`112,110, 104,1U4, i01
`9J.YU.1!9.t:9.~7
`97,n,1!5.96,\14,X~
`
`_ , ·-
`
`!
`I
`
`:
`
`M~lll l
`1~ I
`- · •. l
`
`49h
`
`Ji\ In the ratios of the different chains a nd occasionally with the
`
`l lotaf disappearance of one or other of the chains. Such eve~ts
`
`are best visualised on IEF analysis of the separated chams
`(fo1'example, Fig. lh, in which the heavy chain of P3 is no
`lon er obser ved). The important point that no new chains a re
`c!et ·-::ted by IEF complements a previous study' of a rat-mouse
`5 hybrid line in which scrambling of V and C regions ~rom the
`a
`light chain' of rat and mouse was n:>t observed. 'n this study,
`... .,th light chains have identical c. regions and therefore
`d
`1 scrambled VL-CL molecules would be undetected. On the other
`p hand, the heavy chains a re of different subclasses a nd we
`p exp:ct scrambh:d V11-CH to be detectable by IEF. They were
`li not observed in the clones studied and if they occur rnust do
`so at n lowet frequew:y, We conclude that in syngeneic cell
`~' hybrid> (as well a.; in interspecies cell hybrids) V-C integration is
`not th ~.csu1 , C.>IOplasrnic events. Integration as a result of
`;";'~ A ::·11nslocation or rearrangement during transcription is
`also suggested by the presence of integrated mRNA molecules11
`tmd by the existence of defective heavy chains in which a
`deletion of V and C sections seems to take place in already
`•:l'mmitted ceJisH.
`The cell line P3-X63Ag8 described above dies when exposed
`to HAT medium. Spleen cells from an immunised mouse also
`die ln growth medium. When both cells are fused by Sendai
`" !rus and the resulting mixture is grown in HAT medium,
`:>urviving clones can be observed to grow and become estab(cid:173)
`hsh~d after a few weeks. We have used SRBC as immunogen,
`\\·hil;h enabled u~. after culturing the fused lines, to determine
`the ~presence of specific antibody-producing cells by a plaque
`un~!\} technique13 (Fig. 2a). The hybrid cells were cloned in
`soft agar'~ and clones producing <~ntibody were easily detected
`by an overlay or SR BC and complement ( Fig. 2b). Individual
`dt•nes were isolated and shown to retain their phenotype as
`;(lr'lost all the clones of the derived purified line arc capa ble of
`1:/~· ng SRBC ( Fig. 2c·). The _Iones were visible to the: naked
`c.'"~~ \for example, Fig. 2d). Both direct and indirect plaque
`
`'
`
`BIOEPIS EX. 1022
`Page 4
`
`

`

`t~<.:hniques u~uu lly do not reveal 19~ l gM
`I D '
`.J11tlll,,dy.
`.,
`1
`.. ,,•c~llks. lgi\1 I'>
`th.:r..:fo re u nlil-..;ly to be pr<:'i<!nl 111
`the
`11 '1rc.ltaceu ~<llllpk 11 (Fig. J [I) bur p <:hllins sh<~ttld <:Ontribute
`.~, rhc patter11 o bta ined a fter rcdu-:tio n (.;ample u, Fig. 3 .'1).
`o1
`1 · Tho:: abo,·<: re;ulls $hvw that <.:dl fu>io n techniques are u
`I' ;,~1\crful tool to produce ~pecific antibody directed a);ainst a
`1 'fctkt•;rminc:d antigen. It further shows that it is possible to
`·vl~ te hybrid lines producing different antibodies directed
`r
`·Jinst the s ame anti!;en and carrying d lffcrent eflector func-
`*
`·"' (direct and indirect plaque).
`;I
`r :1c uncloned population of PJ- spleen hybrid cells seems
`n ,uirc heterogeneous. Using suitable detection procedures it
`T. ;hould be possible to isola te tissue c ulture cell lines making
`it Jiil'aent classes of a ntibody. To fac ilitate our studies we have
`lt Jl~d a myeloma parenta l line which itself produced an lg.
`re vari.llltS in which one of the parental chains is no longer ex(cid:173)
`:d ore.s;ed seem fairly common in the case of PI- PJ hybrids
`ri (fig. lh). Therefore selection of lines in whic h only the specific
`· mdb!Jdy chains are expressed seems reasonably simple.
`g~~ltcrnatively.' ~on-producing variants ~r myeloma lines could
`:i. be us.:d for fuston.
`e We used SRBC as antigen. Three different fusion experiments
`u~ were successful in producing a large number of antibody(cid:173)
`N' proJ .tcing cells. Three weeks after the initial fusio n, 33/ 1,086
`:r.:
`·d
`
`A
`
`B
`
`1
`I
`
`.•
`
`;
`
`,
`
`t
`
`,. -·
`
`'
`
`c
`
`.......
`
`b
`
`c
`
`......
`
`a
`
`c
`
`Fill. 3 Autmadiograph of labetl.:ll co~1ponents sccr~teJ by anti(cid:173)
`SR BC' specific hybrid lines. Fractional tOn before ( 8) anti after (A)
`
`l redt1ction was by IE F. pH gradient was 5.0 (h<lttom) to 9.0 (top)
`
`in th~: pres~nce of 6 M urc:a. Oth~r <.:OntlilillnS as in Fig. I. S\tper(cid:173)
`natants fro m: u, hybrill clune Sp-1/7·2: h, hybrid clone Sp-2/J-J:
`r, myeloma line P :l-X67A~:8.
`
`497
`
`Inhibition of haemolysis by antibody secreted by h ybrid
`fig. 4
`clone Sp-1/7-2. The reaction was in a 9-cm Petri dish with a layer
`of 5 ml 0.6% agarose in phosphate-buffered saline containing 1/80
`(v/v) SRBC. Centre well contains 2.5 ~tl 20 times concentrated
`culture medium of clone Sp-1/7-2 and 2.5 111 mouse serum. a,
`Sheep specific anti-mouse macroglobulin (MOPC 104E, Dr
`Feinstein); b, sheep anti-MOPC 21 (P3) lgG I absorbed with Adj
`PC-5; c, sheep anti-Adj PC-5 (lgG2a) absorbed with MOPC 21.
`After overnight incubation at room temperature the plate was
`developed with guinea pig serum diluted I :10 in Dulbecco's
`medium without serum.
`
`clones (3 %) were postttve by the direct plaque assay. The
`cloning efficiency in the experiment was 50%. I n another ex peri·
`ment, however, the proportion of positive clones was con·
`siderably lower (about 0.2%). In a third experiment the hybrid
`population was studied by limiting dilution analysis. From 157
`independent hybrids, as many as 15 h a d anti-SR.BC activity.
`T he proportion of positive over negative clones is remark(cid:173)
`ably high. It is possible that splt!en ce lls which h ave been
`triggered during immunisation a re particularly successful in
`giving rise to viable hybrids. It remains to be seen whether
`similar resu lts can be obta ined using other antigenes.
`The cells used in this study are all of BALB/c origin and the
`hybrid clones can be injected into BALB/c mice to produce
`solid tumours a nd serum having anti-SRBC activity. It is
`possible to hybridise antibody-producing cells from different
`origins•·•. Such cells can be grown in l'l"tro in massive cultures
`to provide specific antibody. Such cultures could be valuable
`for medical and industrial use.
`~
`1
`
`M RC Laboratory of Molecular Biology,
`Hills Road, Cambridge C812QH, UK
`
`G. K oHLER
`C. M ILSTEIN
`
`Received May 14; accepted June 26, 1975.
`• Poner,. M .. Phy>iol. Rtv., 52, 631-719 (1972).
`1 Ho ribolo, K., and Harris. A. W., Expl Ctll Ru., 60. 61-70 11970).
`J Mil,lein. C .. onu Munro, A. J., in Dt/t n« and R.cognlflon(edit. by Porter. R. R.),
`199·228 (1\tTP Int. Rev. Sci., Buncrworth, London, 1973).
`• Conon, R. G. H., and Milstein. C., Naturr, 2~4. 42-43 (197)).
`'Schwobcr, J ., and Cohen, E. P., Prar. natn. Ar11d.Sd. U.S.A .• 71,2203· 2207 (1974) •
`• Lillleftclu, J . \V., SciM«, 145,709 ( 1964).
`7 Svo.ti, J., and Ml15tcin, C .. Divrhtm. I ., 128. 427-444 ( 1972).
`A Mlllo.tcin , C .• Adctu~bo. K., Co wan, N. J., and $c:,:h~r. D . S .. Prf$.r~$S in lmmuno(cid:173)
`/t11fy, II , 1 (edit. by Bren l, L., and Ho lborow. ).), I S7-168 (Nonh·Ho llond,
`Am\lerdom. 1974).
`• Horri•, II., anu Watkins, J. F .. Nawrt, l OS, 640.646 ( 196~).
`10 A"dch. A. L .. Willi•m•on. A. R., and Asko nos, B. A .. Nawr<. 21~. 66-67 ()968),
`11 Mil\tci•t. C .. Brownlee, C . G., C3rtwright, E.. M .. J11n·is. J. M., and Proudroot,
`f', J., Nultlft, 152, 3S4-J59 (19741.
`ll l'rongionc. B .. and Mll>tcin, C., Nu/11,., H~ • . ' Q7-S99 (1969).
`t ) Je• ne, N. K., and Nordin. A. A .. Scirtt<,, 1~0.~(15 (1 963).
`14 Cuuon. R. G. H., Sech<r, 0 . S., and MilStein, C., Eur. J. fmrmm ., l, t3S·I40
`( 19131.
`'
`
`BIOEPIS EX. 1022
`Page 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket