Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 2774
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`v.
`
`UNILOC USA, INC., et al,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`§
`§
`§ Case No. 2:16-cv-00642-JRG
`§
`LEAD CASE
`§
`§
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`§ Case No. 2:16-cv-00638-JRG
`APPLE INC.,
`§
`BLACKBERRY CORPORATION and
`§ Case No. 2:16-cv-00639-JRG
`BLACKBERRY LIMITED,
`§ Case No. 2:16-cv-00640-JRG
`KAKAO CORPORATION,
`§
`LINE EURO-AMERICAS CORP. and
`§ Case No. 2:16-cv-00641-JRG
`LINE CORPORATION,
`§ Case No. 2:16-cv-00645-JRG
`WHATSAPP, INC.,
`§ Case No. 2:16-cv-00722-JRG
`AOL, INC.,
`§ Case No. 2:16-cv-00725-JRG
`BEETALK PRIVATE LTD.,
`§ Case No. 2:16-cv-00728-JRG
`FACEBOOK, INC.,
`§ Case No. 2:16-cv-00731-JRG
`GREEN TOMATO LTD.,
`SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC, § Case No. 2:16-cv-00732-JRG
`Defendants.
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO P.R. 4-3
`
`Pursuant to P.R. 4-3 and the Court’s Docket Control Order, Plaintiffs Uniloc USA, Inc.
`
`and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. (collectively “Uniloc”); and Consolidated Defendants, Samsung
`
`Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”); Apple, Inc. (“Apple”); Blackberry Corporation and
`
`Blackberry Limited (collectively “Blackberry”); Kakao Corporation (“Kakao”); Line Euro-
`
`Americas Corp. and Line Corporation (collectively “Line”); WhatsApp, Inc. (“WhatsApp”);
`
`AOL, Inc. (“AOL”); Beetalk Private Ltd. (“Beetalk”); Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”); Green
`
`Tomato Ltd. (“Green Tomato”); and Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC (“Sony”) (collectively
`
`“Defendants”) hereby submit the parties’ Joint Claim Construction Statement.1
`
`1 Defendant Green Tomato has yet to make an appearance in this action.
`1
`
`Page 1 of 31
`
`LG/HUAWEI EXHIBIT 1111
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192 Filed 03/10/17 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 2775
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`P.R. 4-3(a): AGREED CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`The parties have not agreed to any claim constructions that require definitions.
`
`P.R. 4-3(b): DISPUTED CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`The chart attached as Exhibit A to this Joint Claim Construction Statement contains the
`
`disputed claim terms, phrases and clauses.
`
`The chart attached as Exhibit B to this Joint Claim Construction Statement contains
`
`Uniloc’s proposed construction of each disputed claim term, phrase, or clause, together with an
`
`identification of all references from the specification or prosecution history that support that
`
`construction, and an identification of any extrinsic evidence known to Uniloc on which it intends
`
`to rely either to support its proposed construction of the claim or to oppose any other party’s
`
`proposed construction of the claim, including, but not limited to, as permitted by law, dictionary
`
`definitions, citations to learned treatises and prior art, and testimony of percipient and expert
`
`witnesses.
`
`The chart attached as Exhibit C to this Joint Claim Construction Statement contains
`
`Defendants’ proposed construction of each disputed claim term, phrase, or clause, together with
`
`an identification of all references from the specification or prosecution history that support that
`
`construction, and an identification of any extrinsic evidence known to Defendants on which they
`
`intend to rely either to support their proposed construction of the claim or to oppose any other
`
`party’s proposed construction of the claim, including, but not limited to, as permitted by law,
`
`dictionary definitions, citations to learned treatises and prior art, and testimony of percipient and
`
`expert witnesses.2
`
`
`2 The Defendants maintain that the parties’ P.R. 4-3 Disclosure and all other activity in this
`litigation, including all future filings, Court hearings, and other activity, should not be construed
`as a waiver to any defense, objection, or motion related to personal jurisdiction or venue, and
`each Defendant maintains any and all objections, defenses, and motions relating to jurisdiction
`2
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 31
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192 Filed 03/10/17 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 2776
`
`III.
`
`P.R. 4-3(c): LENGTH OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING
`The parties request four hours for the claim construction hearing, divided as two hours
`
`for Uniloc and two hours for Defendants.
`
`IV.
`
`V.
`
`P.R. 4-3(d): LIVE WITNESS TESTIMONY
`No party will present live witness testimony at the claim construction hearing.
`
`P.R. 4-3(e): OTHER ISSUES
`Any other outstanding issues will be addressed in the briefing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Date: March 10, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: Aaron S. Jacobs
`Paul J. Hayes
`Kevin Gannon
`Aaron S. Jacobs
`PRINCE LOBEL TYE LLP
`One International Place, Suite 3700
`Boston, MA 02210
`Tel: (617) 456-8000
`Fax: (617) 456-8100
`Email: phayes@princelobel.com
`Email: kgannon@princelobel.com
`Email: ajacobs@princelobel.com
`
`Craig Tadlock
`State Bar No. 00791766
`John J. Harvey, Jr.
`State Bar No. 09179770
`TADLOCK LAW FIRM PLLC8
`2701 Dallas Parkway, Suite 360
`Plano, TX 75093
`Tel: (903) 730-6789
`Email: craig@tadlocklawfirm.com
`Email: john@tadlocklawfirm.com
`
`and venue that have been previously raised. For example, SIE maintains that the Court lacks
`personal jurisdiction over it and that venue is improper in this case, and instead avers that it has
`been improperly named in this suit. Apple, Facebook, and WhatsApp have filed motions seeking
`a change of venue. Defendants also reserve all rights to challenge venue, as appropriate, based
`on the outcome of TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, Case No. 16-341 (S.
`Ct.).
`
`
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 31
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192 Filed 03/10/17 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 2777
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS
`
`
`COOLEY LLP
`
`/s/ Lowell D. Mead
`
`Deron Dacus (Texas Bar No. 00790553)
`The Dacus Firm, P.C.
`821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
`Tyler, TX 75701
`Phone: (903) 705-1117
`Fax: (903) 581-2543
`ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`
`Heidi L. Keefe (CA Bar 178960)
`Mark R. Weinstein (CA Bar 193043)
`Lowell D. Mead (CA Bar 223989)
`COOLEY LLP
`Five Palo Alto Square
`3175 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Phone: (650) 843-5000
`Fax: (650) 857-0663
`hkeefe@cooley.com
`mweinstein@cooley.com
`
`Phillip E. Morton (DC Bar No. 1032243)
`James P. Hughes (DC Bar No. 974653)
`COOLEY LLP
`1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20004
`Phone: (202) 842-7800
`Fax: (202) 842-7899
`pmorton@cooley.com
`jhughes@cooley.com
`
`Attorneys For Defendants
`Facebook, Inc. and WhatsApp Inc.
`
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`
`By: /s/ Patrick McCarthy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 31
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192 Filed 03/10/17 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 2778
`
`Mark G. Davis
`Bar No. 412228 (DC)
`Ronald J. Pabis
`Bar No. 473023 (DC)
`Stephen K. Shahida
`Bar No. 454970 (DC)
`Patrick J. McCarthy
`Bar No. 990490 (DC)
`Myomi T. Coad
`Bar No. 1017904 (DC)
`Minsoo Kim
`Bar No. 5328026 (NY)
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`2101 L. Street, N.W., Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20037
`Telephone:
`(202) 331-3104
`Facsimile:
`(202) 331-3101
`Email:
`davisma@gtlaw.com
`
`
`pabisr@gtlaw.com
` shahidas@gtlaw.com
` mccarthyp@gtlaw.com
`
`
`coadm@gtlaw.com
` kimmin@gtlaw.com
`
`Rene Trevino
`Bar No. 24051447 (TX)
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 1700
`Houston, TX 77002
`Telephone:
`(713) 374-3500
`Facsimile:
`(713) 374-3505
`Email:
`trevinor@gtlaw.com
`
`Richard Edlin
`Bar No. 2051696 (NY)
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`MetLife Building
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10002
`Telephone: (212) 801-9200
`Facsimile: (212) 801-6400
`Email:
`edlinr@gtlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Samsung Electronics
`America, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`Page 5 of 31
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192 Filed 03/10/17 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 2779
`
`
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`
`By: /s/ Abran J. Kean
`Abran J. Kean
`CO Bar No. 44660
`Erise IP, P.A.
`5600 Greenwood Plaza Blvd, Suite 200
`Greenwood Village, CO 80111
`T: (913) 777-5600
`F: (913) 777-5601
`abran.kean@eriseip.com
`
`Eric A. Buresh
`KS Bar No. 19895
`Erise IP, P.A.
`6201 College Blvd, Suite 300
`Overland Park, KS 66211
`T: (913) 777-5600
`F: (913) 777-5601
`eric.buresh@eriseip.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Sony Interactive
`Entertainment LLC
`
`/s/ Brian Craft
`Brian Craft
`TX Bar No. 04972020
`Eric H. Findlay
`TX Bar No. 00789886
`Findlay Craft, P.C.
`Principal Office:
`102 North College Avenue, Suite 900
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Tel: (903) 534-1100
`Fax: (903) 534-1137
`Email: bcraft@findlaycraft.com
`Email: efindlay@findlaycraft.com
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`
`Vivian Kuo
`D.C. Bar No. 468804
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`1700 K St, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20006-3817
`
`
`
`6
`
`Page 6 of 31
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192 Filed 03/10/17 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 2780
`
`Tel: (202) 282-5000
`Fax: (202) 282-5100
`Email: VKuo@winston.com
`
`
`Matthew Tanner
`TX Bar No. 24088505
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`1111 Louisiana Street, 25th Floor
`Houston, TX 77002-5242
`Tel: (713) 651-2600
`Fax: (713) 651-2700
`Email: MTanner@winston.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant AOL Inc.
`
`
`/s/ Jason W. Cook
`Jason W. Cook
`Texas State Bar No. 24028537
`Shaun W. Hassett
`Texas State Bar No. 24074372
`McGuireWoods LLP
`2000 McKinney Avenue
`Suite 1400
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Tel: 214-932-6400
`Fax: 214-932-6499
`jcook@mcguirewoods.com
`shassett@mcguirewoods.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants BlackBerry Corporation
`and BlackBerry Limited
`
`
`/s/ James E. Marina
`Michael E. Jones
`State Bar No. 10929400
`POTTER MINTON
`A Professional Corporation
`110 N. College, Suite 500
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`(903) 597 8311
`(903) 593 0846 (Facsimile)
`mikejones@potterminton.com
`
`James E. Marina (pro hac vice)
`
`
`
`7
`
`Page 7 of 31
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192 Filed 03/10/17 Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 2781
`
`Jeremy D. Wilson (pro hac vice)
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`601 Lexington Avenue
`New York, New York 10022
`(212) 446-4800
`(212) 446-4900 (Facsimile)
`james.marina@kirkland.com
`jeremy.wilson@kirkland.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant BeeTalk Private LTD
`
`
`/s/ C. Matthew Rozier
`Clayton C. James
`clay.james@hoganlovells.com
`Srecko “Lucky” Vidmar
`lucky.vidmar@hoganlovells.com
`C. Matthew Rozier
`matt.rozier@hoganlovells.com
`Hogan Lovells US LLP
`1601 Wewatta Street, Suite 900
`Denver, CO 80202
`Telephone: (303) 899-7300
`Facsimile: (303) 899-7333
`
`
`Alali Dagogo-Jack
`alali.dagogo-jack@hoganlovells.com
`Hogan Lovells US LLP
`Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1500
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Telephone: (415) 374-2300
`Facsimile: (415) 374-2499
`
`
`Attorneys for Apple Inc.
`
`/s/ Jay F. Utley
`Jay F. Utley
`Texas State Bar No. 00798559
`Email: Jay.Utley@bakermckenzie.com
`BAKER &MCKENZIE LLP
`2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 2300
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Phone: 214 978 3000
`Fax: 214 978 3099
`D. James Pak
`Admitted pro hac vice
`
`
`
`8
`
`Page 8 of 31
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192 Filed 03/10/17 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 2782
`
`California State Bar No. 194331
`Email: D.James.Pak@bakermckenzie.com
`BAKER &MCKENZIE LLP
`Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Phone: 415 592 3209
`Fax: 202 416 7033
`Yon S. Sohn
`Texas State Bar No. 24083888
`Email: Yon.Sohn@bakermckenzie.com
`BAKER &MCKENZIE LLP
`700 Louisiana, Suite 3000
`Houston, Texas 77002
`Phone: 713 427 5082
`Fax: 713 427 5099
`Counsel for Defendants LINE Euro-
`Americas Corp. and LINE Corp.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`Page 9 of 31
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192 Filed 03/10/17 Page 10 of 10 PageID #: 2783
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are
`being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-
`5(a)(3) on March 10, 2017.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Lowell D. Mead
`Lowell D. Mead
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`Page 10 of 31
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 2784
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`1
`
`Page 11 of 31
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 2 of 21 PagelD #: 2785
`
`EXHIBIT A — Joint Claim Construction Chart
`
`There are five patents in suit, U.S. Patent Nos. 7,535,890 (“the ’890 patent”); 8,199,747 (“the ’747 patent’’); 8,243,723 (“the
`
`°723 patent”); 8,724,622 (“the ’622 patent”); and 8,995,433 (“the ’433 patent”).! The parties have yet to reach agreementas to the
`
`construction of the following claim terms, phrases and clausesrecited in one or more of the patents-in-suit:
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`24, 27, 38
`
`“890 patent claim 1, “instant messaging software or|instant voice messaging terminal
`
`4, 6,9, 14, 15, 18,
`hardwareassociated with a
`connected over a networkto a
`20, 23, 28, 29, 32,
`user”
`server
`34, 37, 40, 41, 43,
`51, 52, 54, 57, 62,
`63, 65, 68, 69
`
`‘723 patent claim 1
`
`°622 patent claim 3,
`
` Uniloc hasnotasserted infringement of every patent against every defendant. Similarly, as to a given patent, not every claim is
`asserted against every defendantaccused ofinfringing that patent. As such, only those defendants who are currently accused of
`infringementof a given claim propose construction of a term within that claim. The remaining defendants reserve their right to
`address those claims at the appropriate time, should they subsequently be accused of infringement.
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 3 of 21 PagelD #: 2786
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`18, 21, 25, 26
`
`“622 patent claim 3,
`4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11,
`12, 13, 14, 15, 16,
`17, 18, 19, 21, 22,
`23, 24, 26, 27, 28,
`29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
`34, 35, 36, 37, 38,
`39
`
`9 “
`
`
`890 patent claim 1,|“instant voice message” “a voice messagethatis, or is voice message to be delivered
`
`5, 6,9, 14, 15, 19,
`capable of being, delivered
`immediately to an available
`20, 23, 28, 29, 33,
`immediately”
`recipient
`34, 37, 40, 41, 42,
`43, 51, 53, 54, 57,
`62, 64, 65, 68, 69
`
`‘747 patent claim 1,
`2, 3, 12, 13
`
`‘723 patent claim 1,
`2,3
`
`‘433 patent claim 1,
`2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9,
`11, 12, 14, 16, 17,
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 4 of 21 PagelD #: 2787
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`3.|°890 patent claim 1, messaging wherein a voice message
`
`“instant voice messaging”
`“messaging of voice messages
`is to be delivered immediately to an
`14, 28, 40, 51, 62
`that are, or are capable of
`available recipient
`being, delivered immediately”
`
`°747 patent claim 1,
`2, 3, 12, 13
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`“networkin which relatively
`small units of data (packets)
`are routed through the
`network based on the
`
`“networkinterface”
`
`“component that provides
`connectivity to the network”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`Alternatively, component or
`functionality that provides
`connectivity to the network.
`
`“potential recipient”
`
`“packet-switched network”
`
`°723 patent claim 1-
`
`3 °
`
`622 patent claim
`13, 14, 16-19, 21,
`22, 27, 28, 31-34,
`38
`
`°433 patent claim 1,
`
`9 “
`
`622 patent claim 3,
`24, 27, 38
`
`‘433 patent claim 1
`
`‘747 patent claim 2
`
`‘723 patent claim 1
`
`“890 patent claim 1,
`2,3, 14, 28, 40, 51,
`62
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 5 of 21 PagelD #: 2788
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`destination address”
`
`recipient, the instant voice
`
`“890 patent claim 1,|the server temporarily storing|Plain meaning [the server] temporarily storing the
`
`14, 28, 40, 51, 62
`the instant voice messageif a
`instant voice message onlyif a
`‘622 patent claim
`selected recipientis
`‘lable /
`selected recipient is unavailable
`11
`unavailable
`temporarily storing at the
`‘723 patent claim 1
`server the instant voice
`“747 patent claim 1,|messageif a selected recipient
`2,3
`is unavailable /
`
`2, 3, 12, 13
`
`‘723 patent claim 1,
`2,3
`
`‘622 patent claim 3,
`13, 14, 19, 24, 27,
`29, 33, 34, 38
`
`‘433 patent claim 1,
`2,5, 9, 10
`
`‘433 patent claim
`26
`
`temporarily storing the
`instant voice messageat the
`external serverif a selected
`recipient is unavailable /
`
`if there is no connection with
`the oneof the plurality of
`instant voice message client
`system [sic] identified as the
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 6 of 21 PagelD #: 2789
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`messageis stored /
`
`temporarily storing the
`instant voice messageif a
`recipient is unavailable /
`
`the instant voice messageis
`temporarily stored when at
`least one recipientis
`unavailable /
`
`stores the instant voice
`message for the one or more
`intended recipients who are
`not currently available /
`
`temporarily storing the
`instant voice message if a
`selected recipientis
`unavailable
`
`determined to be available
`
`delivering from the server the
`stored instant voice message
`to the selected recipient once
`the selected recipient becomes
`available /
`
`“890 patent claim 1,
`14, 28, 40, 51, 62
`
`‘622 patent claim
`11
`
`delivering the stored instant
`voice message to the selected
`recipient once the selected
`recipient becomesavailable /
`
`Plain meaning
`
`pushingthe stored instant voice
`messageto the selected recipient
`whenthe selected recipientis
`
`‘723 patent claim 1
`
`‘433 patent claim
`26
`
`‘747 patent claim 1,
`2,3
`
`delivered when the one of the
`plurality of instant voice
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 7 of 21 PagelD #: 2790
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`message client systems
`identified as the recipient re-
`established [sic] a connection /
`
`delivering the stored instant
`voice message to the recipient
`oncethe recipient becomes
`available /
`
`receiving a temporarily stored
`instant voice message when a
`recipient becomes available
`
`25
`
`delivers the instant voice
`message to the one or more
`intended recipients who are
`not currently available when
`the instant voice messaging
`server determinesthat the not
`currently available one or
`moreintendedrecipients
`becomeavailable /
`
`“890 patent claim 1,|available / unavailable / Plain meaning available/availability: connected to
`
`
`
`5, 14, 19, 28, 33,
`availability
`the [network/server]
`40, 42, 51, 53, 62,
`64
`
`unavailable: disconnected from the
`[network/server]
`
`‘747 patent claim 1,
`2,3
`
`‘433 patent claim
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 8 of 21 PagelD #: 2791
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`‘622 patent claim 3|objectfield “A block of data being carried|Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`by the message object such
`as(but not limited to) a
`digitized instant voice
`message”
`
`
`
`‘622 patent claim 4|action field “A block of data identifying Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`permitted actions such as (but
`notlimited to connect,
`disconnect, subscribe,
`unsubscribe, and post
`message”
`
`external and transmits...
`
`
`‘622 patent claim 6|identifier field “A block of data uniquely Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`identifying the message”
`
`“622 patent claim 7|sourcefield “A block of data with a Plain and ordinary Meaning
`
`globally unique identifier of
`the sender”
`
`
`
`“622 patent claim 8|destination field “A block of data with the Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`globally unique identifier of
`the intendedrecipient”
`
`
`
`“890 patent claim
`29
`
`one or more external
`recipients connected to the
`
`Plain meaning
`
`Indefinite
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 9 of 21 PagelD #: 2792
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`connection object messages
`
`‘622 patent claim
`24, 25, 26
`
`messages containing data
`“messages containing data
`representing the state of the
`representing the state of the
`connection and code (one or more
`connection and code for
`methods) for establishing and
`establishing and maintaining
`the logical connections between|maintaining the logical connections
`the server and theclients”
`between an instant voice messaging
`server and instant voice messaging
`clients
`
`to § 112(6), then—
`
`
`17.|‘622 patent claim “componentofthe client Indefinite and should be construed
`
`“document handler”
`platform that oversees the
`within the functional phrases
`27
`retrieving, sending, receiving
`andstoring of one or more
`documents(orfiles) attached
`to instant voice messages
`from/to the one or more
`
`‘433 patent claim
`14
`
`selected [VM recipients that
`may be communicating with
`the IVM client”
`
`
`‘433 patent claim Plain meaning and not subject|Function: create a link between the
`document handler to create a
`14
`link between the instant voice
`to 35 U.S.C. § 112(6)
`instant voice message andthe one
`message and the one or more
`or morefiles
`files
`
`If this term is found to be subject Structure: Indefinite
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 10 of 21 PagelD #: 2793
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Function:“create a link
`
`between the instant voice
`message and the one or more
`files”
`
`12:24-34 andFig. 3, and/or
`
`Structure: The document
`handler 306 is a componentthat
`overseesthe retrieving, sending,
`receiving andstoring of one or
`more documents (or files)
`attached to instant voice
`messages from/to the one or
`more selected IVM recipients
`that may be communicating with
`the IVM client 208. When an
`instant voice messageis to be
`transmitted to the one or more
`IVM recipients, one or more
`documents may be attached to
`the instant voice messageto be,
`stored or displayed by the one or
`more selected IVM recipients, as
`described in the ‘622 patentat
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 11 of 21 PagelD #: 2794
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`Indefinite and should be construed
`within the functional phrase /
`
`eeeee
`“622 patent claim
`documenthandler system /
`Plain meaning and not subject
`27
`document handler system for
`to 35 U.S.C. § 112(6)
`attaching one or morefiles to
`the instant voice message
`
`transmitted to the one or more
`
`Function: attaching one or more
`files to the instant voice message
`Structure: Indefinite
`
`If this term is foundto be subject
`to § 112(6), then—
`
`Function: “attaching one or
`morefiles to the instant voice
`
`message”
`
`Structure: The document
`handler 306 is a componentthat
`overseesthe retrieving, sending,
`receiving and storing of one or
`more documents (or files)
`attached to instant voice
`messagesfrom/to the one or
`moreselected IVM recipients
`that may be communicating with
`the IVM client 208. When an
`instant voice messageis to be
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 12 of 21 PagelD #: 2795
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`switched network” Structure: The encryption /
`
`Function: for encrypting the instant
`.
`:
`Encryption / decryption
`voice messagesto be transmitted
`system for encrypting the
`over the packet-switched network
`instant voice messagesto be
`and decrypting the instant voices
`transmitted over the packet-
`
`switched network and If this term is found to be subject|Messagesreceived over the packet-
`decrypting the instant voices
`to § 112(6), then—
`switched network
`messages received over the
`°
`packet-switched network
`Structure: Indefinite
`
`“622 patent claim
`19
`‘433 patent claim 5
`
`IVM recipients, one or more
`documents may be attached to
`the instant voice messageto be,
`stored or displayed by the one or
`more selected IVM recipients, as
`described in the ‘622 patentat
`12:24-34 andFig. 3, and/or
`equivalents.
`
`Plain meaning and not subject
`to 35 U.S.C. § 112(6)
`
`Function: “encrypting the
`instant voice messages to be
`transmitted over the packet-
`switched network and decrypting
`the instant voices messages
`received over the packet-
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 13 of 21 PagelD #: 2796
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`decryption 316 component
`provides for respectively
`encrypting / decrypting of
`outgoing/incoming audiofiles
`(i.e., instant voice messages), as
`described in the ‘622 patentat
`12:46-48 and Fig. 3, and/or
`equivalents.
`
`304, communicates via standard
`
`“622 patent claim
`27, 38
`
`‘433 patent claim 1,
`9
`
`messaging system for
`transmitting the instant voice
`message over the packet-
`switched network [via the
`networkinterface]
`
`Plain meaning and not subject
`to 35 U.S.C. § 112(6)
`
`Function: transmitting the instant
`voice message over the packet-
`switched network [via the network
`interface]
`
`If this term is found to be subject
`to § 112(6), then—
`
`Structure: Indefinite
`
`Function: “transmitting the
`instant voice message overthe
`packet-switched network via the
`network interface”
`
`Structure: The messaging
`system 320 is a componentthat,
`together with the client engine
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 14 of 21 PagelD #: 2797
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`
`inter-process communication.
`The messaging system 320 and
`client engine 304 also
`communicate with the [VM
`
`server 202 over the network
`
`
`
`interface via the network 204, as
`described in the ‘622 patentat
`12:21-26 and Fig. 3, and/or
`equivalents. Alternatively, the
`messaging system 436
`component andthe server engine
`304 communicate via standard
`inter-process communication.
`The messaging system 436 and
`the server engine are also able to
`communicate with the [VM
`
`clients 206, 208 over the
`network interface via the
`network 204. The messaging
`system 436 communicatesto the
`server engine 404 via message
`objects, as described in the ‘622
`patent at 13:55-14:5 and Fig.4,
`and/or equivalents.
`Plain meaning and not subject
`
`Function: creating an audio file for
`the instant voice message based on
`
`‘622 patent claim
`18
`
`audiofile creation system
`creating an audiofile for the
`
`

`

`‘433 patent claim 4
`
`instant voice message based
`on inputreceived via an audio
`input device coupled to the
`client device.. .
`
`to 35 U.S.C. § 112(6)
`
`input received via an audio input
`device coupled to the client device
`
`If this term is found to be subject
`to § 112(6), then—
`
`Function: “creating an audio
`file for the instant voice message
`based on inputreceived via an
`audio input device coupled to the
`client device”
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 15 of 21 PagelD #: 2798
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`Structure: Indefinite
`
`Structure: The audiofile
`creation 312 componentcreates
`an instant voice message as
`audio file 210, and is responsible
`for receiving input speech for the
`instant voice message from
`audio input device 212 or via
`network 204 andstoring the
`input speech into audiofile 210,
`as described in the ‘622 patentat
`12:40-44 and Fig. 3, and/or
`equivalents.
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 16 of 21 PagelD #: 2799
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`“622 patent claim
`34
`
`Structure: Indefinite
`
`Plain meaning and not subject
`to 35 U.S.C. § 112(6)
`
`Function: “compressing the
`instant voice messages to be
`transmitted over the packet-
`switched network and
`decompressing the instant voice
`messages received over the
`packet-switched network”
`
`Structure: The compression /
`decompression 318 component
`respectively compresses/
`decompresses the outgoing /
`incoming audiofiles, as
`described in the ‘622 patentat
`12:48-50 and Fig. 3, and/or
`equivalents.
`
`Function: compressing the instant
`compression/decompression
`voice messagesto be transmitted
`system for compressing the
`over the packet-switched network
`instant voice messagesto be
`and decompressing the instant voice
`transmitted over the packet-
`
`switched network and If this term is foundto be subject|Messages received over the packet-
`decompressing the instant
`to § 112(6), then—
`switched network
`voice messagesreceived over
`the packet-switched network
`
`
`
`
`
`“622 patent claim “the system of the client engine|Indefinite and should be construed“client platform system”
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 17 of 21 PagelD #: 2800
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`27, 38
`
`(Uniloc)
`
`which controls other
`
`within the functional phrase /
`
`‘433 patent claim 1,
`9, 18, 21
`
`“client platform system for
`generating an instant voice
`message” (Defendants)
`
`components used to generate
`an instant voice message” and
`not subject to 35 U.S.C. §
`112(6)
`
`Function: generating an instant
`voice message
`
`Structure: Indefinite
`
`If this term is found to be subject
`to § 112(6), then—
`
`Function: “generating an
`instant voice message”
`
`and/or equivalents. “622 patent claim 3,
`
`Structure: Theclient platform
`302 includesa client engine 304,
`which controls other
`components, including the
`document handler 306,file
`manager 308, audio file creation
`312, signal processing 314,
`encryption / decryption 316, and
`compression / decompression
`318, as described by the ‘622
`patent at 12:17-21 and in Fig.3,
`
`“the system of the server which|Indefinite and should be construed
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 18 of 21 PagelD #: 2801
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`relays communications and/or|within the functional phrase /
`system” (Uniloc)
`11, 12, 24, 26.
`tracks client connection
`
`accesses database 414,
`
`oo.
`-
`.
`Function: “maintaming
`connection information for each
`ofthe plurality of instant voice
`message client systems
`indicating whetherthere is a
`current connection to each of the
`plurality of instant voice
`message client systems”
`
`Function: maintaining connection
`information for each of the plurality
`of instant voice messageclient
`systems indicating whetherthere is
`a current connection to each of the
`plurality of instant voice message
`client systems
`
`Structure: Indefinite
`
`information”and not subject
`to 35 U.S.C. § 112(6)
`
`If this term is found to be subject
`to § 112(6), then—
`
`“communication platform
`system maintaining
`connection information for
`
`each of the plurality of instant
`voice message client systems
`indicating whetherthere is a
`current connection to each of
`
`the plurality of instant voice
`messageclient systems”
`(Defendants)
`
`Structure: The
`communication platform 402
`includesa server engine 404,
`client manager 406, station
`manager 408, gateway manager
`410, database manager 412 that
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00642-JRG Document 192-1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 19 of 21 PagelD #: 2802
`
`Terms, Phrases and Clauses
`
`Uniloc’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`of] storing, deleting and retrieving
`
`manager 806, a user manager
`808, and a transport manager
`810, as described in the ‘622
`patent at 23:3-6 and Fig. 8,
`and/or equivalents.
`
`supplemental servers 416, as
`well as a control layer 426, as
`described in the ‘622 patentat
`13:49-55 and Fig. 4, and/or
`equivalents. Alternatively, the
`communication platform 702
`includesa server engine 704,
`which controls a user manager
`706, a local server manager 708,
`and a storage manager 710, as
`described in the ‘622 patentat
`22:40-43 and Fig. 7, and/or
`equivalents. Alternatively, the
`communication platform 802
`includesa server engine 804,
`whichcontrols a local server
`
`
`
`‘622 patent claim “system that services requests|Indefinite and should be construed“file manager system”
`regardingfiles” and not
`within the functional phrase/
`(Uniloc)
`17,31
`subject to 35 U.S.C. § 112(6)
`Function: [performingat least one
`
`“433 patent claim 1
`
`“a file manager system
`
`

`

`If this term is found to be subject|the instant voice messages from the
`performingat least one of
`to § 112(6), then—
`message database in responseto a
`storing, deleting and
`retrieving the instant voice
`user request
`messages from the message
`database” (Defendants)
`
`Structure: Indefinite
`
`Function: “[performingat
`least one of] storing, deleting
`and retrieving the instant voice
`messages from the message
`database”
`
`“a file manager system
`storing,