`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 13
`Entered: May 4, 2018
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ALEX IS THE BEST, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-02055 (Patent 8,947,542 B2)
`Case IPR2017-02056 (Patent 8,134,600 B2)
`Case IPR2017-02059 (Patent 8,581,991 B1)1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before DANIEL N. FISHMAN, MINN CHUNG, and
`JESSICA C. KAISER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FISHMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner’s Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jeffrey M. Barron
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`1 This Order applies to each referenced case. The parties are not authorized
`to use this heading style.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02055 (Patent 8,947,542 B2)
`IPR2017-02056 (Patent 8,134,600 B2)
`IPR2017-02059 (Patent 8,581,991 B1)
`
`
`In each of the identified cases, Petitioner moves for pro hac vice
`recognition of Jeffrey M. Barron (IPR2017-02055 Paper 12; IPR2017-02056
`Paper 12; IPR2017-02059 Paper 12). Each such motion is supported by a
`corresponding Declaration of Mr. Barron. (IPR2017-02055 Ex. 1011;
`IPR2017-02056 Ex. 1015; IPR2017-02059 Ex. 1012). In each such motion,
`Petitioner indicates Patent Owner does not oppose the motion. See, e.g.,
`IPR2017-02055, Paper 12, 1. The motions are granted. Petitioner shall
`submit an updated power of attorney including Mr. Barron as a backup
`counsel. Counsel recognized pro hac vice shall comply with 37 C.F.R. Parts
`11 and 42 and the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,755
`(Aug. 14, 2012), and is subject to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`§ 11.19(a).
`Accordingly it is:
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motions for pro hac vice admission of
`Jeffrey M. Barron for the above-identified proceedings are granted; Mr.
`Barron is authorized to represent Petitioner only as back-up counsel in the
`above-identified proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Barron is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Part 42 of 37 C.F.R., and is to be subject to the USPTO Rules of
`Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq., and
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a); and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel in the above-identified
`proceedings.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02055 (Patent 8,947,542 B2)
`IPR2017-02056 (Patent 8,134,600 B2)
`IPR2017-02059 (Patent 8,581,991 B1)
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Joshua Larsen
`Jeffrey C. Morgan
`Steven Shipe
`Barnes & Thornburg LLP
`joshua.larsen@btlaw.com
`steven.shipe@btlaw.com
`jeff.morgan@btlaw.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`C. ANDREW
`IM IM IP LAW PLLC
`docket@imiplaw.com
`
`3
`
`