throbber
THK JOURNAL. OF BiOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
`Vol. 253, No. 2, Issue of January 25, pp. 585-597, 1978
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`From the Department of Biophysics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore,
`
`(Received for publication, July 7, 1977)
`
`
`
`The three-dimensional structure of the Fab fragment
`are discussed
`
`
`in relation to the genetic control and physiological function of
`
`"model building" and "real space" procedures. By these
`
`immunoglobulins.
`It is generally accepted (see review in Ref. 1) that electron
`
`
`techniques, the correlation between the amino acid se­
`multiple isomorphous
`
`
`density maps calculated by multiple isomorphous replacement
`
`replacement Fourier map has been optimized. The average
`
`shift of all atoms during real space refinement
`
`Preliminary Refinement and Structural Analysis of the Fab
`Fragment from Human Immunoglobulin New at 2.0 A
`Resolution*
`FREDERIC!< A. SAUL, L. MARIO AMZEL, AND ROBERTO J. POLJAKt
`Maryland 21205
`Fab New.1 Some features of the refined structure
`from human myeloma lgG New has been refined using
`quences and the 2.0 A resolution
`was 0.62 A. A
`techniques contain significant errors which may lead to impre­
`list of the refined atomic coordinates for the 440 amino acid
`amino acid side chain atoms, bond angles, r/l and ijl values, cis
`cise determination of structural details such as the location of
`prepared using the refined coordinates show a distribution
`project was undertaken w1th the aim of obtaining more
`or trans character
`etc. This refinement
`which can be appHed to structural studies
`of other immunoglobulins and Fab · hapten complexes (2). The
`to the predomi­
`of q,, 1/.1 angular values which corresp()nds
`accurate coordinates
`starting atomic coordinates were those of the structure previ­
`
`nant JI-pleated sheet conformation present in the structure.
`(3, 4) obtained using multiple isomorphous
`
`The structures of the homology subunits V11, VL, Cnl, and
`
`CL were superimPosed by pairs and quantitatively com­
`ously described
`of two
`were @bserved between V H
`pared. The closest similarities
`
`
`heavy atom replacements. Since the complete refinement of
`the structure of Fab New is a complex undertak ing, we
`
`and VL and between Ciil and CL. Amino acid sequence
`refinement techniques. In the first step we have
`
`
`alignments obtained from this structural superposition are
`present here initial results obtained after application
`served between CHI(')' heavy chain) and C1, (A. light chain).
`given. The closest sequence homology in Fab New is ob­
`consecutive
`were adjus.ted to impose standard
`
`
`applied a "model building'' procedure (5) in which the mea­
`procedure (6, 7) was used to optimize the correlation between
`In addition, there is considerable homology between the
`
`sured atomic coordinates
`bond lengths and bond angles. In a second step a "real space"
`variable and constant regions.
`The distances of close contacts between the homology
`a distances; 1.2 times their
`
`subunits of Fab New have been determined. The closer
`the Fab New model and the multiple isomorphous replace­
`nature of the immunoglobulin
`an improved model which has been used to compare the
`contacts,
`those between atoms at
`ment, electron density Fourier map.
`van der Waals radii, are analyzed in relation to the constant,
`
`The coordinates obtained by these P'rocQdures have provided
`
`variable, and hypervariable
`
`sequence positions at which they occur. Most of the residues
`tertiary structure of the homology subunits, to calculate
`Fab, and to re-examine
`
`interatomic contacts that define the quaternary structure of
`which determine the closer contacts between V11 and VL and
`
`the conformation of the combining
`
`between CH 1 and Ci. are structurally homologous and highly
`
`conserved or conservatively replaced in immunoglobulin
`site.
`sequences.
`measured on the 2 A (nominal) resolution model previously de­
`METHOOS
`Measurement of Model Coordinates -Atomic coordinates were
`The relation between idiotypic determinants, antigen
`
`
`
`combining site and hypervariable regions, is discussed in
`scribed (4). A two-pointer device was used for this purpose: a
`terms of the refined model.
`horizontal pointer (50 inches long) was brought to touch atom
`centers by displacing the device on the base of the model, adjusting
`crystallographic refinement and a list of atomic coordinates of
`fixed poin�r of equal length gave the x, y while a second, parallel,
`In this paper we present the results of a preliminary
`the height of the pointer aloni;r a i;rraduated scale (z coordinate)
`
`of the model. The use of a level and
`* This work was supported by Research Grant AI 08202 from the
`leveling screws at the base of the two-pointer device was essential
`National Institutes of Health and by Researeh Grants NP-141B and
`for obtaining reproducible coordinates. While these measurements
`were made, the image of the model and the atom centers were
`This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in
`accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`' The abbreviations used for immunoglobulins, their polypeptide
`t Recipient of United States Public Health Service Research
`chains, and fragments are as recommended in (1964) Bull. W H 0
`30, 447.
`
`residues in the structure is given. Ramachandran plots
`
`of proline residues,
`
`IM-105C from the American Cancer Society. The costs of publication
`of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges.
`
`coordinates on a grid at the base
`
`Career Development Award AI-70091.
`
`585
`
`1 of 14
`
`BI Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`586
`
`Structural Refinement of Fab New
`
`TABLE II
`
`projected on the corresponding sections of the Fourier map using an
`optical comparator (8) to verify that their location and the coordinate
`values corresponded with the Fourier map.
`Model Building Procedure -The set of measured coordinates for
`the 3185 non-hydrogen atoms in the structure provided the starting
`
`point for this procedure. In general, these coordinates are subject to
`
`errors due to measurement uncertainty and to mechanical deforma­
`tions of the skeletal brass model. Consequently, the mathematical
`model building procedure of Diamond (5) programmed for a digital
`computer was used in order to impose standard bond lengths and
`bond angles in the model. The measured coordinates were used to
`provide a guide point for each (non-hydrogen) atom in the structure.
`Some conditions used in this part of the refinement process are given
`
`in Table I. All the varied angles are dihedral; the r hs-<:<>-<:l angle
`
`Conditions of real space refi.nernent•
`
`Zone length:
`6
`Margin width:
`Fixed atomic radii: 1.4 A
`
`5
`Relative atomic weights; C:6, 0:7, N:8, S:l6
`x: 3.2
`"'· ijJ: 4.0
`
`Relative softness of angular parameters that were allowed to vary:
`
`A,.,.,n
`
`Amir/A.max
`
`Filter levels:
`
`0.0001
`Sca�e factor and background
`0.01
`0.01
`0.001
`Translational refinement
`0.001
`0.001
`Rotational refinement•
`Electron density map grid; 111.43/160, 56.68/80, 90.30/130 along cell.
`edge's
`
`• SP.e Diamond (6, 7) for definition of terms.
`•Nonlinear constraints were used to preserve chain continuity.
`
`1). Many carbonyl groups of the main polypeptide chain can
`be reliably positioned (Fig. 2). In general, coordinates of atoms
`in regions of strong, well defined electron density converged
`rapidly in the first cycle of refinement and moved very little
`in subsequent cycles. Atoms in regions of lower density
`converged more slowly. A few residues
`in poorly defined
`regions of low density showed little convergence, although
`movement of main chain atoms tended to be smaller than
`their total shift from the starting coordinartes was small. The
`those of side chains, presumably due to their better defined.
`
`electron density and to grearter constraints on their positions.
`The progress of refinement was checked after each cycle by
`inspecting the fit of atoms whose shifts were substantially
`greater than the average. Some side chain groups which had
`been shifted by the Diamond model building procedure were
`
`moved back to their original positions by real space refine­
`than 1 A occurred for three consecutive amino acid residues
`(Gly 166, Val 167, and His 168) in the CHI region. Inspection
`
`ment. ln the fifth cycle ofrefinement, an average shift greater
`
`of the position of these atoms showed that they had moved to
`a conformation that appears to be in better agreement with
`the electron density map than the original model. The coordi­
`nates for all atoms of Fab New after refinement, given in the
`"Appendix," are filed with the Protein Data Bank at Brook­
`haven National Laboratory. No major features of the map
`remain unexplained, although a number of possible solvent
`molecules are found on the surface of the molecule. The
`conventional R factor,2 based on F, obtained with the coordi­
`nates. in "Appendix" and an overall temperature factor (B =
`ment approximations outlined in Table 11 and the fact that no
`18.0), is R = 0.46. This value is reasonable given the refine­
`
`solvent atoms were included in the model. Further refinement
`using observed structu.re factors and calculated phases is
`currently underway.
`The S-S distances in the five Fab disulfide bonds were
`allowed to vary without constraints. At the end of the refine­
`
`ment these distances were found to be: V H• 2.00 A; V L• 2.46 A;
`C.,1, 2.30 A; Ci.. 2.30 A; C11l-C1., 2.43 A.
`Ramachandran Plots
`'R = l I F0 -Fe I /lF0, where F0 is observed structure amplitude
`The Ramachandran plots of the V L and C1. homology sub-
`(-B sin' 0/A 2).
`3 The isotropic temperature factor (B) used fo the expression exp
`
`and F< is calculated structure amplitude.
`
`was allowed to vary since this condition gave a much closer correla­
`tion with input coordinates without introducing large distortions in
`the idealized, model-built geometry of the molecule. Residues for
`which the model-built coordinates differed considerably from the
`ured and checked for correspondence with the Fourier map. These
`input coordinates or which had an abnormal r0 value were remeas­
`of coordinates or to distortions of the brass model. When necessary
`discrepancies could always be traced to errors in the measurement
`ITo - 109.3°1> for the 440 residues in th1> model-built
`1:itr0(tirr0 =
`structure was 5.43°. Pro 151 in C., I was built and refined in the cis
`nates for all non-hydrogen atoms in the st.ruduri. wa!< 0. 2 A.
`conformation. The root mean square shift from the initial coordi­
`as a starting set for real space refinement (6). The 2.0 A electron
`at intervals of 1/160 along x, (a = ll 1.43 A), 1/80 along y (b = 56.68
`Al, and 1/130 along z (c = 90.30 A) in sections of constant y. A
`
`the coordinates were measured again nftcr rebuilding distorted
`regions and the remeasured coordinates were submitted to the model
`building procedure as guide points. The final average value of
`
`Real Space Refinement -The model-built coordinates were used
`
`density map used for the automatic fitting of the atomic coordinates
`was calculated using multiple isomorphous replacement phases as
`described before (3, 4). The electron density function was: calculated
`
`computer program incorporating a fast-Fourier transform algorithm
`was used for this calculation. Five cycles of real space refinement
`were carried out using the conditions defined in Table IL Values of
`atomic radii for carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur that gave
`fastest convergence in trials using a small part of the structure were
`adopted and kept constant during refinement. Progress in the
`
`refinement process was followed by inspection of the root mean
`square shifts in coordinates, shifts in the coordinates of individual
`atoms, and adjustments of amino acid scale factors. Unusually large
`
`shifts in coordinates were checked using the optical comparator and
`the Fourier map. All refinement calculations were carried out using
`computer programs implemented at the Brookhaven National Lab­
`oratories.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`The root mean square shifts of atomic coordinates after five
`cycles of real space refinement converged to an average value
`
`of 0.09 A. The values after each cycle were: 0.46 A, 0.20 A, 0.13
`A, 0.10 A, and 0.09 A. The average shift of all atoms during
`real space refinement was 0.62 A. In most parts of the
`
`molecule, the coordinates after refinement are in very good
`agreement with the features of the electron density map (Fig.
`
`TABLE I
`Conditions of model building refinement•
`residues were used. In addition, r(Ca CfJ Cy) was allowed t-0 vary in
`Parameters varied were: q,, o/J, x:, T (N Ca C). Flexible proline
`Filter constants
`Diamond (7).
`Probe
`c.
`C,
`
`Cys, His, Phe, Trp, and Tyr residues. A list of the sources of the
`amino acid groups used in model building is given in Table I of
`
`Lenfuh
`(resi ues)
`
`I
`2
`3
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`0 See Diamond (5) for definition of terms.
`
`0.1
`0.1
`0.1
`
`10-•
`10-•
`10-•
`
`2 of 14
`
`BI Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`
`
`Structural Refinement of Fab New
`
`587
`
`Stereo view of some main chain and side chain
`Stereo view of some amino acid residues of Fab
`New superimposed on the corresponding
`density of the multiple
`
`imposed on the corresponding electron density of the multiple
`
`isomorphous replacement map. Carbonyl groups of the main poly­
`map.
`peptide chain are clearly seen.
`
`-..___
`
`. .
`
`.
`
`180
`
`240
`
`300
`
`360
`
`
`
`of<f:>, o/J angles indicates the predominant
`
`0
`
`/J.
`/ lo
`[ I I I I 'l
`I I ' ..... 1
`
`.
`
`•
`
`_,,,, .
`
`••
`
`
`
`•
`
`antiparallel P-pleated
`
`(upper).
`FIG. 2 (lower).
`groups of Fab New after five cycles of real space refinement super­
`F1G. 1
`isomorphous replacement 2 A resolution
`• ., ..
`360r-��-.�.�,�.--.-� ....... -,�� --.� �� � ��� ...... �� ......
`.. . .. , .. . :
`. . . \
`360
`0
`-�� ... _ o:
`I
`.
`•": • I
`• •.•.
`. . .. �.,t: ·: .
`300
`'
`300
`-4\� • •• • I
`<t- ••
`/1 f • I
`• •'1� I
`• • • 1 e
`• •• • • I
`>'
`/
`0 ·� /,,,,,-•
`. , f • I I I
`I
`• I I I
`I I , I I I ( I
`2.40
`240
`I •
`'
`I
`_ _ 1 ,----
`'
`1 _____
`,_,
`'-------··
`.
`180
`180
`�
`0 /--- .-,
`I
`/
`f
`/ •• I
`/ . .,
`--- __ J
`-----
`I
`' '• .,
`I
`120
`120
`60
`60
`0 --.---- ----,,
`o�-----�---_-� .....
`� --·� ---�'"..-��-"���
`...... � �� ..... �� ........
`0
`60
`120
`0
`60
`120
`240
`180
`300
`360
`FJC. 3. Ramachandran plots of the VL and Q homology subunits ofFab New. The distribution
`
`sheet structure of the subunits. Glycine residues are indicated by 0.
`units (see Fig. 3) show a distribution
`structure present in V H• V L• CHl, and c ... As observed in
`the </>, tfJ angles for glycine
`
`
`
`of <f>, l/J angles which
`residues are scattered in the plot, frequently appearing in
`
`
`corresponds with the predominant antiparallel ,8-pleated sheet
`
`nonallowed regions for L-amino acids. Several other residues
`
`
`which occur outside areas of allowed conformation are found
`
`in bends of the polypeptide chains; it is expected that further
`
`several other protem structures,
`
`3 of 14
`
`BI Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`588
`
`Structural Refinement of Fab New
`
`refinement will improve the angular values observed for these
`residues.
`
`
`
`Structural Comparison of Homology Subunits
`
`The structural homology of V H• VL, C81, and CL has been
`
`Initial matrices relating the Ca coordinates of the homology
`subunits were obtained from a small number of structurally
`
`equivalences new matrices were calculated and the process
`was iterated until no changes in equivalences were observed.
`A summary of the results is presented in Table Ill which lists
`
`subunits which were superimposed and compared by this
`process. The average value of the minimum base change
`
`lent amino acids is also given in Table lll.
`As can be seen in Table Ill, there is an even closer structural
`homology between VH, VL, C81, and CL in Fab New than that
`
`higher resolution of the Fab New model. Presumably the Ca
`
`(inverse! correlation between the number of Cas that are
`structurally equivalent and the average minimum base
`change per codon. Furthermore, when a restrictive condition
`
`average base change per codon becomes smaller, reflecting a
`
`alignment procedure described above. However, this proce·
`dure leads to amino acid sequence alignments that clearly
`
`(see Figs. 4 and 5). The closest sequence similarity in Fab
`
`described before (3, 4). A quantitative analysis of this homol­
`ogy using the method of Rao and Rossmann (9) is presented
`here. A $imil!lr !ln'1lysis h!l$ been m!lde by Rich<irdson et r;rl.
`the murine Fab McPC 603 fragment.
`(10) comparing the structures of superoxide dismutase and
`equivalent amino acids. The num.ber of equivalences was
`peptide chain for which the distances between putatively
`then extended by an automatic search for stretches of poly­
`equivalent Cas was smaller than 3.8 A. Based on the extended
`the number of Cas occurring at distances of less than 1.5 A
`and less than 3.0 A, for all the six possible pairings of
`necessary to exchange the codons of the structurally equiva­
`observed for McPC 603 Fab (10), probably reflecting the
`distances given in Table IIJ could become smaller with further
`impose with distances shorter than 1.5 A and 3.0 A is larger
`crystallographic refinement. The number of Cas which super­
`when comparing V H to V L and CHl to CL. Also, there is good
`for structural equivalence is imposed (dc"-<.A 5 1.5 A) the
`higher degree of conservation of amino acid sequences.
`It should be emphasized here that amino acid sequence
`information is not used in the quantitative three-dimensional
`Vi.., and between the Cii and Ct regions of immunoglobulins
`reflect the well established homologies between the V8 and
`New occurs between �l(y) and Ct(X), although, as shown in
`to that between � 1 and Ci. (see Figs. 6, 7, and 8). In addition,
`Table III, the structural similarity between V8 and v .. is close
`TABLE Ill
`Alignment of a-carbon coordinates of four homology subu nics of Fab
`(New) using method of Rao and Rossmann (9)
`base change
`Average
`Average
`Number of
`Number of
`minimum
`minimum
`c. pairs
`c. pairs
`base change
`dc.-ca{' I. 5 dc.-eoA'5. 1. 5 deo.,,.A s. 3. o dc.-eoAs. 3.o
`equiva·
`equiva·
`lenced with per codon for
`lenced with per codon for
`56
`81
`0.97
`0.98
`60
`82
`0.80
`0.71
`1.03
`66
`1.23
`40
`59
`1.04
`1.28
`1.24
`58
`1.04
`29
`25
`J.29
`1.40
`49
`27
`
`Subunits
`
`VwV1.
`C11i-CL
`c .. -v ..
`c .. -vH
`CHI-VI.
`c .. 1-v11
`
`Table III shows that there is considerable homology between
`
`regions of immunoglobulins.
`
`the V and C regions. These results can be interpreted to
`amino acid residues with highly preserved three-dimensional
`indicate that all the homology regions contain a basic core of
`structure. The chemical nature of these residues is also
`findings strongly support the postulate (15) of a gene duplica­
`preserved as indicated by the correspondingly lower values of
`the average base change per codon. As stated before (3) these
`tion mecha11i:;rn whida gave ri:;e w thi:! different humulugy
`The Cas of the homologous sequences, -Phe-Gly-Gly-Gly­
`(99 t.o 102) in Vi, and -Trp-Gly-Gln-Gly-(107 t.o 110) in VH, can
`be closely superimposed as can Ca atoms immediately preced­
`ing and following those residues. This conserved conformation
`gives no evidence supporting the postulate (16) that the
`glycine residues could serve as a pivot to allow for optimal
`quences has been proposed (4) in terms ofintersubunit (Vu to
`contacts between an antibody and its ligands. An alternative
`explanation for these constant, homologous V11 and Vi, se­
`V1,, see below) and intrasubunit contacts.
`defined from the model. The sequence -Val-Ser-Ser- (115 to
`The limits between the V and C homology regions can be
`117, Fig. 4) which is shared by y and µ.human H chains marks
`polypeptide chain the sequence -Ala-Ser-Thr (118 to 120)
`(106 t.o 108) corresponds to the COOH terminus of Vi.. and the
`residues -Gln-Pro-Lys- (110 to 112) constitute the NH2 termi­
`of VL or as the beginning residue of Ct. By the structural
`alignment described here however, Arg 109 can be properly
`In agreement with the Gm(4-) serological specificity oflgG
`considered as the COOH terminus of Vi,.
`This residue, corresponding to the Gm(l 7) allotype provides a
`better fit with the Fourier map than an arginine residue
`IgG New (17) which has been verified
`tation is reinforcR.d hy thP. Gm(l +) ."-P.rolngic.sil spe.r.ifir.it.y of
`(which correlates with Gm(4)) at that position. This interpre­
`
`the COOH terminus of Vu, and following a sharp bend in the
`
`marks the NH2 terminus of�l. The sequence -Thr-Val-Leu­
`
`nus of Ct. Thus, in the three-dimensional model Arg 109
`(usually assigned to VL) could be considered either as the end
`
`New (17), a lysine residue is placed at position 214 in Cu 1.
`
`analysis (12).
`
`by amino acid sequence
`
`Quaternary Structure
`
`Contacts between Homology Subunits -The closer contacts
`between the homology subunits of Fab New are diagrammat­
`
`indicates that the interactions between Vu and VL and be­
`tween � 1 and C.. are more extensive than those between Vu
`
`ically represented in Fig. 9 by lines joining Ca atoms sepa­
`rated by a distance of 8 A or less. This figure provides a
`description of regions of VH, Vi., � 1, and C.. in which there
`are higher density of contacts. Inspection of Figs. 8 and 9
`and C,,, 1 and those between Vi.. and Q. The fact that the V11
`and Ci.i 1 subunits (whose major axes make an angle smaller
`than 90°) interact more extensively than V1, and Ct (whose
`major axes makes an angle larger than 90°) is also reflected in
`Figs. 8 and 9.
`atom� situated at a distance not larger than 1.2 times their
`Intersubunit contacts between side chain and main chain
`contacting residues and the number of close contacts that
`
`van der Waals radii are given in Table IV. This table lists
`
`atoms from a given residue make with atoms of other residues.
`Evidently, amino acids with larger side chains have a poten­
`tial to make more contacts with other amino acids, thus for
`
`example, VH Trp 107 makes 29 intersubunit contacts, Trp 47
`
`4 of 14
`
`BI Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`Structural Refinement of Fab New
`
`589
`
`110
`
`120
`
`uo
`
`140
`
`150
`
`QPIAAPSVTLPPPSSllLQA•IATLVCLISDPYPGAV-TVAWl--ADal--
`
`120
`
`130
`
`140
`
`150
`
`---------------
`
`160
`
`ASTKGPSVFPLAPSSKSTSGGT�ALG
`
`CLVKDYPPSPV-TVSWW
`
`---SG••-•
`
`--------------
`
`61
`
`· · ·- - - rsvs1sa-
`
`70
`
`TPLaS•VTMLVWT-s
`
`- - - -- ----SSATLAITGLQAIDIADYYCQSYDl8L
`
`70
`
`90
`
`90
`
`100
`
`100
`
`l• • -vrGGGTILTVLl
`
`110
`
`109
`117
`
`90
`
`80
`-------K•OPSLaLSSVT
`
`AADTAVYYCaawLIAG
`
`•CIDVWGQG8LVTV••
`
`Ftc. 4. Amino acid sequences of the V,,, C... VH, and C,,1 homology regions ofFab New aligned by comparison of their three-dimensional
`170
`180
`190
`200
`310
`:220
`sequence. See Ref. 11 for the VL and C,, sequences, Ref. 12 for VH, and Ref. 13 for C,. l. Abbreviations for amino acids are as given in Ref. 14.
`struct11res. - - - indicate gaps introduced to maximize alignment of the three-dimensional structures. * indicate deletions in the VL
`
`-ALTS--
`
`GVBTPPAVLQSSGLYSL
`
`S8VVTVPSS8LGT-QTYIC•v••••••T1-vo11-v1r1ac
`
`homology regions of Fab New. The
`
`Fm. 5. Diagram of hydrogen bond­
`atoms for the VL, c.., V,., and C,.l
`ing (broken lines) between main chain
`hydrogen-bonded clusters correspond
`to the tw0 P-sheet structures of each
`ipate in intrachain and interchain di­
`sulfide bonds are underlined.
`
`subunit. Cysteine residues that partic­
`
`makes 28 contacts and Arg 43 makes 24 contacts.
`The contacts between V11 and VL are of particular interest
`in view of the fact that different H and L immunoglobulin
`
`chains can form structurally viable pairs. Three types of Vu-
`
`Vi. contacts will be considered in this discussion: first, the
`by residues which are invariant or semi-invariant in V11 and
`
`contacts which are a t the core of the contacting region, made
`
`V1• sequences; second, the contacts made by invariant or semi-
`
`5 of 14
`
`BI Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`590
`
`Structural Refinement of Fab New
`
`Flo. 6. Stereo pair drawings of the
`a carbon backbones of the VL (top) and
`V" (bottom} 11ubunit.5. The 11ubunit.5 are
`viewed here in similar orientations.
`
`Flo. 7. Stereo pair drawing
`of the a
`Clirbon backbones of the Q (top) and
`C,. l (bottom) subunits viewed in simi­
`lar orientations.
`
`6 of 14
`
`BI Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`Structural Refinement of Fab New
`
`591
`
`Fie. 8. Stereo pair drawing of the- oc
`carbon backbone of Fab New.
`
`invariant residues with hypervariable residues; and finally,
`those made between hypervariable residues.
`The core of the Vu-VL contacting region can be described as
`
`determined by residues Val 37, Gin 39, Leu 45, 'fyr 94, and
`
`at these positions could be accommodated by small displace­
`ments of the hypervariable peptide loops. These "idiotypic"
`interactions are consequently more difficult to assess. How­
`ever, they could perhaps explain the preferred reassociation
`observed between complementary H and L chains derived
`from a single immunoglobulin molecule (20). Most of the
`contacts discussed above consist of van der Waals interactions
`between hydrophobic side chains. However, a few hydrogen
`
`to VL Tyr 90 and/or v •. Arg 95. Also, an ion pair is fonned
`bonds can be indicated: V11 Gin al.I to v .. Gin 37, and V11 Asn 98
`In the Fab New model the contacts between V11 and V1• are
`between V11 Arg 43 and V� Asp 84.
`
`very close (Table IV), giving rise to a compact dimer. No
`haptens or even solvent molecules can be accommodated
`between V11 and Vi. beyond the combining site, a situation
`which is different from that described for an L-chain dimer
`(21).
`
`are extensive. The core of the contact area between C.11 and
`C,. is defined by Ci 1 residues Leu 128, Ala 129, Gly 143, and
`
`Pro 121, Val 135, and Leu 137. These residues appear to be
`invariant or nearly invariant in the H and L sequences from
`
`As shown in Table IV the interactions between C.11 and C,.
`Leu 145 and the structurally homologous C.. residues Phe 120,
`such as C-,.il: Phe 126, Pro 127, Thr 139, Lys 147, Phe 170, Pro
`different animal species. Most of the other contact residues
`171, Val 173, Gin 175, Ser 181, Val 185, Lys 218, and C..: Thr
`118, Ser 123, Glu 125, Glu 126, Lys 131, Thr 133, Thr 164, Ser
`homologous residues in the immunoglobul in chains from dif­
`of contacts (20 contacts) they make with each other and with
`/3-pleated sheet is more conserved than the rest of the CA
`(or genealogic tree) of distorted evolutionary distances. This
`
`177, Tyr 179, Lys 206, are also invariant or replaced by
`
`ferent animal species. In the contact area the central location
`of C111 Leu 128 and C.. Pbe 120 is reflected in the large number
`
`many other residues (see Table IV). As pointed out by Novotny
`and Franek (22) the amino acid sequence of the four-stranded
`
`regions in different animal species, leading to a dendrogram
`
`pattern in both C,11 and C,. in order to preserve
`
`observation can be analyred in terms of the structural model
`presented here as follows. The four-stranded f3 sheets of C111
`and C.. contain side chains which make intrasubunit contacts
`and in particular, they contain all or nearly all of the contact
`residues between Ci I and C,, (discussed above). Evidently,
`mutational events leading to amino acid replacements at
`these positions would have to occur in a complementary
`tertiary and
`quaternary immunoglobulin structure, and consequently they
`would be expected to occur at a slower rate than mutations in
`other regions of Ci 1 and C, ..
`As can be seen in Table JV the region immediately preced­
`ing the interchain disulfide bond does not provide close con­
`tacts between C,11 and C, .. In addition, the two strands of
`
`contacts with each other (about 50% of those listed in Table
`
`region, are nearly parallel and stacked on each other. The
`
`different animal species. For example, Tyr 35, Gln 37, Pro 43,
`
`Gin 39, Tyr 94 (replaced by Phe in a very few cases), and Trp
`
`Trp 107 in Vn and by residues Tyr 35, Gin 37, Ala 42, Pro 43,
`Tyr 86, and Phe 99 in V1•• These residues are structurally
`homologous with the except.ion that VL Ala 42 has no clear
`4). These homologous V11 and Vi. residues make numerous
`correspondence in V1, due to a structural "insertion" (see Fig.
`IV) or with other, nonhypervariable residues. The rings ofTrp
`107 (V11) and Pro 43 (V1), at the center of the VL -V11 contacting
`contact residues listed above are invariant or are replaced by
`homologous residues in Vi. V< and X) and V11 sequences from
`and Phe 99 appear constant in human L chains (K or A), and
`107 (replaced by Phe or Tyr in a very few cases) appear nearly
`constant in human H chains. Ala 42, Tyr 86 in Vi. and Val 37
`Ser 42, Phe 86, and Ile 37. The invariant or nearly invariant
`in VH are more frequently replaced by homologous residues:
`tween Ci 1 and Ci_, see below) for the property of different H
`provides a structural basis (together with interactions be­
`cules (see References 18, 19, and in particular 20, for a recent
`A second type of contact listed in Table IV is made between
`
`nature of these residues of the main VwV1. contacting area
`
`and L chains to recombine into new immunoglobulin mole­
`
`review and experimental data on this topic).
`
`constant or nonhypervariable residues and hypervariable res­
`idues. For example, the side chain atoms of Vn Trp 47, a
`constant residue in human, mouse, guinea pig, and in most
`rabbit immunoglobulin sequences, make close contacts with
`Ser 93, Leu 94, and Arg 95 in the third hypervariable region of
`V1 •• However, a large number of these contacts involve the
`peptide chain atoms of the V1• residues. Replacements in the
`
`VL side chains will not necessarily alter the nature of these
`
`contacts. Similar contacts appear to be made by V1• Leu 45
`(invariant or semi-invariant in human L chains) with the
`peptide chain at VH hype.rvariable position 104. Contacts of
`
`chain atoms of the fourth hypervariable region ofV11 in chains
`of different length than V11 New.
`The third type of contact to be discussed here is that made
`between hypervariable residues, such as those made between
`
`this type could also be made from Vi. Tyr 35 to the peptide
`VH Asn 98 and V1• Arg 95. These contacts are more difficult to
`evaluate in general terms (a) because the location of some of
`sequence, and (b) because it is possible that in other immu­
`the residues involved might be changed by further refinement
`to a larger extent than those of most other residues in the
`
`noglobulins, replacements by different amino acid side chains
`
`7 of 14
`
`BI Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`592
`
`VH
`
`ti
`
`10
`
`,,
`
`Structural Refinement of Fab New
`CL
`VH
`
`117
`
`120
`
`121
`
`122
`12•
`
`123
`
`1S2
`
`163
`
`15'
`195
`UN
`
`117
`
`176
`
`17&
`
`2 1 2
`
`213
`
`...
`'5
`..
`"
`..
`"
`
`51
`58
`eo
`
`1°'
`
`101
`102 103
`105
`1oe
`107
`IOI
`1119
`
`110
`
`21'
`
`CH1
`
`CL
`
`7•
`
`120 ·==r
`
`161'
`
`1•
`
`1•
`171
`
`172
`
`l.I
`1.0
`
`161
`
`152
`
`163
`
`CH1
`
`128
`
`127
`
`1211
`1211
`
`130
`
`131
`
`132
`
`133
`
`1311
`''°
`1'2
`1'3
`
`141
`
`170
`
`171
`
`172
`
`173
`
`11•
`175
`176
`
`211
`
`219
`
`220
`
`VL
`
`31
`39
`40
`
`79
`80
`12
`
`112
`
`113
`
`,,,
`
`Fie. 9. Intersubunit a carbon contacts at distances of 8 A or less. Contacts are indicated by lines joining the corresponding amino oc.id
`T'l'sidue numbers. Numbers on the lin£i; indicate the contact distance (in Angstroms). Note the extensive VL .vH and C..·C.1 l interactions.
`fide bond do not closely interact with the rest of C11 ll or C,,.
`mental flexibility residing around this part of the immuno­
`polypeptide chain that come together at the interchain disul­
`globulin structure and in the immediately adjacent hinge
`region of the H chain.
`This region can be described as having a loose conformation,
`structural features are in agreement with the notion of seg-
`The results of several experimental approaches (see Chapter II
`
`with a lower electron density in the Fourier map. These
`
`Hyperuariable Regions, ldiotypes, and Combining Site­
`
`8 of 14
`
`BI Exhibit 1083
`
`

`

`hypervariable residues in the amino acid sequences of H and
`
`of an antibody molecule partially overlap. X-ray crystallo­
`graphic analyses (2-4, 21, 24, 25) provided an unequivocal
`confirmation of these conclusions and three-dimensional
`models of different immunoglobulin molecules in which the
`
`defined.
`
`in Ref. 23 for a comprehensive review) strongly suggested that
`L chains, idiotypic determinants, and combining site residues
`structural bases of these operational concepts could be further
`The hypervariable regions of the H and L chains are located
`can be folded without a defined secondary structure (such as a
`on exposed bends of the polypeptide chains, in regions which
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket