throbber
AmpUftcation of a Novel v�rbB-Related Gene In a
`Human Mammary Carcinoma
`
`Abstract. The cellular gene encoding the receptor for epidermal growth factor
`(EGF) has considerable homology to the oncogene of avian erythroblastosis virus. In
`a human mammary carcinoma, a DNA sequence was identified that is related to v­
`erbB but amplified in a manner that appeared to distinguish it from the gene for the
`EGF receptor. Molecular cloning of this DNA segment and nucleotide sequence
`analysis revealed the presence of two putative exons in a DNA segment whose
`predicted amino acid sequence was closely related to, but different from, the
`co"esponding sequence of the erbBIEGF receptor. Moreover, this DNA segment
`identified a 5-kilobase transcript distinct from the transcripts of the EGF receptor
`gene. Thus, a new member of the tyrosine kinase proto-oncogene family has been
`identified on the basis of its amplification in a human mammary carcinoma.
`
`growth factor receptors, we used the v­
`erbB gene to probe for related genes that
`might be candidates for other receptor
`coding sequences. We selected moderate
`stringency hybridization conditions un­
`der which different oncogenes of the
`tyrosine family did not cross-hybridize.
`Thus, any gene detected might be ex­
`pected to have a closer relationship to v­
`erbB than to other members of the tyro­
`sine kinase family.
`DNA prepared from tissue of a human
`
`A
`!! �
`..
`c:
`.. ..
`•
`0 u "
`• c .,
`i 2 c
`
`c:
`
`B
`• ..
`• 0 •
`i
`
`� .. ..
`u c 2
`
`..
`
`" ., c
`
`C. RICHTER ICING
`MATTHIAS H. KaAvs
`STVAJtT A. AARONSON
`Laboratory of Cellular and
`Molecular Biology,
`National Cancer Institute,
`Bethesda, Maryland 20205
`
`The oncogenes of the acute transform­
`ing retroviruses have counterparts, des­
`ignated proto-oncogenes, that arc con­
`served within the human genome (1).
`The human sis prot<K>ncogenc encodes
`one major polypeptide chain of platclct­
`dcrivcd growth factor (POOF) (2), and
`the erbB prot<K>ncogcnc appears to en­
`code the receptor for epidermal growth
`factor (EGF) (3). A number of other
`proto-oncogenes, like erbB, share nucle­
`otide sequence homology with the tyro­
`sine kinase-encoding src gene (4). The
`fact that cellular receptors for several
`growth factors or hormones, including
`the EGF receptor, possess this enzymat­
`ic activity suggests that other prot<K>n­
`cogcnes may encode growth factor re­
`ceptors as well.
`Genetic alterations affecting prot<K>n­
`cogencs of the tyrosine kinase family can
`play a role in spontaneous tumor devel­
`opment. A specific translocation affect­
`ing the c-abl locus, for example, is asso­
`ciated with chronic myclogcnous leuke­
`mia (5). Several recent studies have also
`documented amplification or rearrange­
`ment of the gene for the EGF receptor in
`certain human tumors (6) or tumor cell
`lines (7). We now report the detection
`and partial isolation of a gene that is a
`new member of the tyrosine kinase fam­
`ily and is amplified in a human mammary
`carcinoma. This gene is closely related
`to, but distinct from, the EGF rcuptor
`gene.
`The identification of additional mem­
`bers of some proto-oncogcne families
`has emerged from findings of related
`sequences amplified sufficiently in a par­
`ticular tumor to allow detection (8). Be­
`cause of our interest in genes coding for
`974
`
`carcinoma, MAC I I 7, showed
`mammary
`a pattern of hybridization (Fig. IA) that
`differed both from that observed with
`DNA of normal human placenta and
`from that observed with the A43 I squa­
`mous-cell carcinoma line, which con­
`tains amplified EGF receptor genes (7).
`In A43I DNA, four Eco RI fragments
`were detected that had increased signal
`intensities compared to those of corre­
`sponding fragments in placenta DNA
`(Fig. IA). In contrast, MACI I 7 DNA
`contained a single 6-kilobasc pair (kbp)
`fragment, which appeared to be ampli­
`fied compared to corresponding frag­
`ments observed in both A43 l and placen­
`ta DNA's (Fig. IA). These findings were
`consistent with the possibility that the
`MACI I7 tumor contained an amplified
`DNA sequence related to, but distinct
`from, the cellular erbB proto-oncogene.
`To clone the 6-kbp fragment, we di­
`gested DNA from MAC117 with Eco RI,
`ligated it into bacteriophage >.gtWES,
`packaged it in vitro, and transferred it to
`Escherichia coli strain BNN45 by infec­
`tion. A library of 4 x 1<>5 bactcriophages
`was screened by plaque hybridization
`with radioactive v-erbB DNA. Ten of 14
`hybridizing phages contained a 6-kbp
`Eco RI fragment. Figure 2 shows the
`physical map of one of these pbqcs,
`AMACI 17, and pMACI I7, a pUC12 sub­
`clone containing a 2-kbp Barn HI frag­
`ment of >.MACl 17 that hybridized with
`v-erbB probes. The region of pMAC117
`to which v-erbB hybridized most in­
`tensely was flanked by Ace I and Nco I
`sites. Human repetitive sequences were
`also localized (Fig. 2, region demarcated
`by arrows).
`By digestion of pMAC117 with Bgl I
`and Barn HI, it was possible to generate
`a single-copy probe homologous to v­
`erbB. This probe detected a 6-kb Eco RI
`fragment that was amplified in MAC117
`DNA and possibly increased in A431
`cellular DNA relative to normal DNA
`(Fig. lB). The sizes of the fragments
`Fia. l . Detection of v-erbB- and pMAC 117-
`corresponded to the amplified 6-kb Eco
`specific sene frqments in normal human pla­
`RI fragment detected in MACl 17 DNA
`centa, A431 cells, or human mammary carci­
`by means of v-erbB (Fig. IA). Hybrid­
`noma MAC117. DNA (15 M) was cleaved
`with Eco RI, separated by electrophoresis
`ization to Southern blots containing seri­
`in
`sels, and transferred to nitrocellulose
`&prose
`al dilutions of MAC117 genomic DNA
`paper (18). Hybridization to the >lP-labeled
`indicated an approximate amplification
`probe (20) was conducted in a solution of 40
`of 5- to l 0-fold when compared to human
`percent formamide, 0.15M NaCl, O.C175M so­
`placenta DNA.
`dium citrate, at 42°C (19). The v-erbB probe
`(A) was a mixture of the 0.5-kbp Bam Hl­
`The nucleotide sequence of the por­
`Bam HI fraam ent and 0.5-kbp Bam HI-Eco
`tion of pMACll7 located between the
`RI fragment of avian erythroblastosis proviral
`Nco I and Ace I sites contained two
`DNA. The pMACl 17 probe (B) WU a 1-kbp
`regions of nucleotide sequence homolo­
`Bal 1-Bam HI fragment. After hybridization,
`gous to v-erbB separated by 122 nucleo­
`the blots were washed first in 0.3M NaCl plus
`0.03M sodium citrate at room temperature,
`tides (Fig. 3). These regions shared 69
`and then in 0.015M NaCl, 0.0015M sodium
`percent nucleotide sequence
`identity
`citrate, and 0.1 percent sodium dodec:yl sul­
`with both the v-erbB and the human
`fate at 42"C (A) or at S2"C (B). Hybridization
`EGF receptor gene. The predicted amino
`was detected by autoradiography.
`SCIENCE, VOL. 229
`
`kbp
`........
`
`-� .......
`
`..,. a.s
`.... 2.0
`
`J ..
`
`1 of 3
`
`BI Exhibit 1041
`
`

`

`1 kb -
`
`0.5 kb
`1----1
`
`pMAC117
`
`. - ·
`
`...
`
`v-erbB
`related
`
`.. .
`
`. . .
`
`•o
`ao
`10
`60
`so
`o
`10
`20
`10
`GTCT ACA TGOOTGCTTCCCA TTCCM;GOOATGAGCT ACCTGGAGGA TGTGCGGCTCGT ACACAGOO ACTTGGCCGCTCGOUCGTGCTGGTCUGAGTCC
`01 yM.t s.,. T y,.l euOluA•pYa l A.rqL euYa l Hi aArQA.spl.evA. l •Al aA.rqAM\ V • 1l.uVa1 l y .SerP,.
`
`CAA.CCA. TGTCA.AAA. TT ACA.GACTTCGGGC TGGCTCGGCTCCTGGACA TTGACOA.GACAGAGT A.CCA TOCA.GA. TGGGGGC AAGGT T A.GGTGAA.GGACCA.A.0
`-
`oA.M\Hi •Y•ll yd leThrA•pPMClyleuA.l aA.rql4".1L euA.spl l•A•pGlt.tThrGluTyrH; sAlaA•.,.01 vG1 yl v•
`
`
`
`GAGCAGAGGAGGCT GOOTGGAGTGGTGTCT AGCCCA TGGGAGAACTCTGAOTGGCCACCTCCCCACAACACACAGTTGGAGOACTTCCTCT TCTGCCCTC
`
`TTCACCCACCAGAGTOATGTGTGGAOT TA f GGT2JGTGA TGGOGGG
`
`cc�rc;cccA TCUOTGGA TGOOGC TGGAO fCCA T TCTCCGCCGGCGG
`Y•lPro 11 e l ysT rpMetAl •leuGluS•r J l •I. 9t.IAr qArQA rQtht!ThrH \ sGlnS•rA•pYal T rpSerTyrGl y
`
`TGTTO
`
`GGA GGGGTGGG TGAGGAGCCA TOO
`
`t 00
`
`200
`
`lOO
`
`400
`
`B BXbR
`B
`BXh
`B
`AMAC117��f�--+i�l--�)l------�l-,+l�l-ll---
`I
`'
`I
`'
`'
`I
`B/
`N BgANN
`\B
`I I II II
`I
`.,_._..
`:
`:
`
`of-tbi& v:.em� �- Neverthe­
`acid se4uence of:.theie regions" was 85
`related tO the nbBJEGF rectPtor 1UDOD1
`known members of the tyrosine kinase
`percent homologous to two regions that
`less, because of its close relationship to
`family. The two genes are distinct,
`on
`the sequence of the EGF receptOr, it is
`
`se­are contiguous in the EGF receptor
`
`quence (7). Furthermore, these two pu­
`
`the basis of sequence diversity and tran­
`possible to speculate that the MAC117
`
`tative coding regions of the MAC117
`script size. Detailed structural analysis
`coding sequence may also be derived
`of the complete coding sequence should
`sequence were each flanked by the AG
`from a gene encoding a growth factor
`
`give insights into the possible functions
`
`and GT dinucleotides that border the
`An oncogene in a chemically
`receptor.
`
`exons of eukaryotic genes (9). These
`findings suggest that the $CQuence shown
`
`in Fig. 2 represents two exons, separated
`by an intron, of a gene related to the
`erbBIEGF receptor gene.
`
`The predicted amino acid sequence of
`
`the AMACl 17 putative exons is homolo­
`
`
`of gous to the corresponding sequences
`
`several members of the tyrosine kinase
`
`family. The most striking homology was
`observed with the human EGF receptor
`or erbB (Fig. 3). In addition,
`we ob­
`served 42 percent to 52 percent homolo­
`gy with the predicted amino acid se­
`quences of other tyrosine kinaso-cncod­
`ing genes. At 25 percent of the positions
`
`there was identity among all the se­
`quences analyzed (Fig. 3). A tyrosine
`
`residue in the AMAC117 putative coding
`
`
`sequence, conserved among the tyrosine
`Fig. 2. Restriction-site map of�MAC117 and plasmid pMAC117. A, Ace I; 8, Barn HI; Bg, Bgl
`
`kinases analyzed, is the site of autophos­
`I; N, Nco I; R, Eco RI; X, Xba I; Xh, Xho I. The sites were located by electrophoretic analysis
`
`
`phorylation of the src protein (10).
`of the products of single and double digestion. Regions homologous to v-erbB or human
`repetitive sequences (region flanked by arrows) were located by Southern blot hybridization
`
`. The availability of cloned probes of
`(18) with the v-erbB probe or total human DNA made radioactive by nick translation (20).
`the MAC117 gene made it possible to
`Hybridization conditions were as described in Fig. IA. The nucleotide sequence of pMAC ll7
`
`
`
`investigate its expression in a variety of
`between the Ace I site and the Nco I sites and regions of encoded amino acid sequence
`cell types. The MACl 17 probe detected
`homologous to the EGF receptor are shown. The AG or GT dinucleotides flanking the putative
`
`a single 5-kb transcript in A431 cells
`coding regions are underlined. To determine the sequence, Nco I, Hinf I, and Sau 96 I
`fragments were labeled at the 3' termini by means of the large fragment of E. coli DNA
`
`(Fig. 4). Under the stringent conditions
`polymerase, separated into single strands by gel electrophoresis, and chemically degraded (21).
`
`of hybridization utilized, this probe did
`not detect any of the three RNA species
`recognized
`by EGF receptor comple­
`mentary DNA. Thus, MAC117 repre­
`
`sents � new functional gene within the
`pMAC117
`H111111n EGF Receptor 85
`
`tyrosine kinase family, closely related
`85
`v-erb8
`v-m
`52
`
`to, but distinct from, the gene encoding
`v-ibf
`51
`the EGF receptor.
`50
`v-1iS
`H-.n lnsu11n 42
`
`There is precedent for the identifica­
`Receptor
`tion of genes related to known onco­
`genes on the basis of their amplification
`•
`* * * *
`•
`LRRR
`DETEfHA-DG-GK--YPIK114ALESI
`pMAC117
`in human tumors. For example, the high
`
`degree of amplification of N-myc in cer­
`v-erbB
`E
`a
`,,
`EDll
`v-m
`ii � II
`tain malignancies made it detectable by
`v-ibf
`ITYT
`-
`means of the myc gene as a molecular
`K
`v-liii
`llO
`H11111n I nsu11 n Receptor YI
`probe (8). In the present study, a five-to
`Y K
`
`
`tenfold amplification of a v-erbB-related
`Fig. 3 Oeft). Comparison of the putative encoded amino acid sequence in pMAC 117 with known
`tyrosine kinase sequences. Black regions represent homologous amino acids. Dift'ering amino
`gene in the MAC117 mammary carcino­
`acid residues are shown in one-letter code (22). Amino acid positions conserved in all sequences
`ma made it possible to identify this se­
`are denoted by•. The tyrosine homologous to that autophosphorylated by the v-src protein (J(J)
`quence against a complex pattern of
`is shown by an arrow. The v-abl sequence contains a tyrosine residue in this region displaced by
`
`EGF receptor gene fragments. Analysis
`two positions. The amino acid sequences of human EGF re«ptor (7), v-erbB (4), v-src (23), v­
`of DNA from ten additional mammary
`abl (24), v-fms (4), and human insulin re«ptor (25) were aligned by the computer program
`described (26). The homology observed with the predicted amino acid sequences ofv-yes and v­
`
`carcinomas has not revealed amplifica­
`fes was SI percent and 48 percent, respectively.
`Fig. 4 (right). Detection of distinct
`tion of the MAC117 gene. However,
`messenger RNA species derived from the >.MAC117 gene and the human EGF re«ptor gene.
`
`
`extensive studies will be required to de­
`Polyadenylated messenger RNA of A431 cells was separated by denaturing gel electrophoresis
`in formaldehyde (23), transferred to nitrocellulose (18). and hybridized under stri�ent
`termine the frequency of MAC117 gene
`conditions (SO percent fonnamide, 0.01SM NaCl, 0.15M sodium citrate, at 42"C) with 2P­
`
`amplification in different human malig­
`labeled probe from pMACl 17(Bgl 1-Bam HI fragment) or human EGF receptor complementary
`nancies.
`DNA (PE7: 2-kb Cla I inserted fragment). Filters were washed under conditions of high
`
`The MAC117 coding sequence, as de­
`stringency (0.015M NaCl plus O.OOISM sodium citrate at SS"C). Hybridization was detected by
`termined by nucleotide and predicted
`autoradiograpby with exposure times of 4 hours for the pMACI 17 probe and I hour for the
`amino acid sequence, was most closely
`
`human EGF receptor probe.
`6 SBPTEMBER 1985
`
`*** * *
`
`*
`
`***
`
`....
`...
`...
`0
`<
`::E
`CL
`
`...
`0
`� ..
`OCL w�
`�
`
`** * *
`
`•
`
`Himan EGF Receptor EIKI
`
`•
`
`•28S
`
`• 18S
`
`975
`
`2 of 3
`
`BI Exhibit 1041
`
`

`

`20. P. W. 1. Rigby, M. Dieckmann, C. Rhodes, P.
`S. A. de Klein et al., Nature (London) 311, 765
`(1982); S. J. Collins and M. T. Groudine, Proc.
`Berg, J. Mo/. Biol. 113, 237 (1977).
`21. A. M. Maxam and W. Gilben, Proc. Natl.
`Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.. 88, 4813 (1983).
`6. T. A. Libermann
`313,
`74, S<iO (1977).
`et al., Nature (London)
`Acad. Sci. U.S.A..
`
`22. The following abbreviations were used for ami­
`144 (1985).
`
`no acids: A, alanine; C, cysteinc, D, aspartic
`7. A. Ullrich et al., ibid. 309, 418 (1984); Y. Xu et
`al., ibid., p. 809; C. R. Lin et al., Science 224,
`
`acid; E, glutamic acid; F. phenylalanine; G,
`
`
`
`glycine; ff, histidine; I, isoleucinc: K, lysine; L,
`843 (1984).
`8. M. Schwab Nature (London) 305, 245 (1983); N.
`
`
`leucine; M, methionine; N. asparaginc; P, pro­
`line; Q, glutamine; R, arginine; S, serine; T,
`E. Kohl et al., Ce/135, 349 (1983).
`
`
`threonine; V, valine; W, tryptophan: Y, tyro­
`9. R. Breatbnach and P. Cbambon, Annu. Rev.
`sine.
`Biochem. se, 349 (1981).
`10. J.E. Sman et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
`23. H. D. Lcbrach, D. Diamond, J.M. Wozney, H.
`
`Bocdtker, Biochemistry 16, 4743 (1977).
`78, ()013 (1981).
`
`11. Alan L. Schechter et al., Nature (London) 312,
`24. A. P. Czemilofsky
`et al., Nature (London) 281.
`193 (1980).
`513 (1984).
`25. E. P. Reddy, M. J. Smith, A. Srinivasan, Proc.
`12. J. A. Drebin, D. F. Stem, V. C. Link, R. A.
`Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.. 80, 3623 (1983).
`Weinberg, M. I. Greene, ibid., p. 545.
`13. E. H. Chang, M. E. Funh, E. M. Scolnick, D.
`26. A. Ullrich et al., Nature (London) 313, 756
`R. Lowy, ibid. 291, 479 (1982).
`(1985).
`27. D. J. Lipman and W.R. Pearson, Science 227,
`14. A. Gazit et al., Ce/139, 89 (1984); M. F. Clarke
`et al., Nature (London) 308, 464 (1984).
`1435 (1985).
`28. K. Semba, N. Kamala, K. Toyshima, T. Yama­
`IS. R. Taub et al .. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
`79, 7837 (1982).
`
`moto, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.., in press.
`29. We thank I. Pastan and G. Merlino for providing
`16. K. Nisbikura et a/., Science 224, 399 (1984).
`17. M. Schwab et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
`the human EGF complementary DNA clone
`
`PE7 and P. di Fiore for the polyadenylated A431
`81, 4940 (1984).
`18. E. M. Southern, J. Mo/. Biol. 98, 503 (1975).
`RNA.
`19. G. M. Wahl, M. Stem, G. R. Stark, Proc. Natl.
`Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1', 3683 (1979).
`
`
`22 April 1985; accepted 3 June 1985
`
`
`
`The neu Gene: An erbB-Homologous Gene Distinct from and
`
`
`
`Unlinked to the Gene Encoding the EGF Receptor
`
`Abstract. The neu oncogene, identified in ethylnitrosourea-induced rat neuroglio­
`blastomas, had strong homology with the erbB gene that encodes the epidermal
`growth factor receptor. This homology was limited to the region of erbB encoding the
`tyrosine kinase domain. It was concluded that the neu gene is a distinct novel gene,
`as it is not coamplified with sequences encoding the EGF receptor in the genome of
`the A431 tumor line and it maps to human chromosome 17.
`
`induced rat neuroblastoma has been de­
`tected by DNA transfection analysis
`(11). This oncogene, designated neu, ap­
`pears to encode a protein immunologi­
`cally related to the EGF receptor (12).
`Whether the MACl 17 coding sequence
`and neu represent the same or different
`cellular genes awaits further character­
`ization.
`Overexpression of proto-oncogenes
`can cause cell transformation in culture
`and may function in the development of
`human tumors. Amplification of a nor­
`mal ras gene or its increased expression
`under the control of a retroviral long
`terminal repeat (L TR) induces transfor­
`mation of NIH 3T3 cells (13). Expression
`of the normal human sis/PDGF-2 coding
`sequence in NIH 3T3 cells, which do not
`normally express their endogenous sis
`proto-oncogene, also leads to transfor­
`mation (14). In Burkitt lymphoma, a
`chromosomal
`translocation
`involving
`myc places its normal coding sequence
`under the control of an immunoglobulin
`gene regulatory sequence (15). The re­
`sulting alteration in myc expression is
`likely to be causally related to tumor
`development (16). The observation of
`amplification of myc or N-myc in more
`malignant phenotypes of certain tumors
`has supported the idea that overexpres­
`sion of these genes can contribute to the
`progression of such tumors (8, 17). The
`erbBIEGF receptor gene is amplified or
`overexpressed in certain tumors or tu­
`mor cell lines (6). The five- to tenfold
`amplification of our v-erbB-related gene
`in a mammary carcinoma suggests that
`increased expression of this gene may
`have provided a selective advantage to
`this tumor. The isolation of a new mem­
`ber of the tyrosine kinase gene family
`amplified in a human mammary carcino­
`ma provides an opportunity to investi­
`gate the potential role of this gene in
`human malignancy.
`Note added in proof. Recently, Semba
`et al. (28) independently detected a v­
`erbB-related gene that was amplified in a
`human salivary gland adenocarcinoma.
`Nucleotide sequence analysis of this
`gene indicates its identity to the MACl 17
`gene in the regions compared.
`
`ALAN L. ScHECHTER
`MIEN-CIDE HUNG
`LALITHA
`VAJDYANATHAN
`ROBERT A. WEINBERG
`Whitehead Institute for Biomedical
`Research and Department of Biology,
`Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
`Cambridge 02142
`TEREsA L. YANG-FENG
`UTA FRANCKE
`Department of Human Genetics,
`Yale University School of Medicine,
`New Haven, Connecticut 06510
`AxEL ULLRICH
`LISA COOS.SENS
`Department of Molecular Biology,
`Genentech, Inc.,
`San Francisco, California 94080
`
`which contained the neu oncogene in a
`biologically active form (2). It remained
`unclear whether the same or other DNA
`segments encode the EGF-r. Other anal­
`ysis uncovered differences between the
`products of the two genes. While poly­
`clonal sera to the EGF-r recognized
`p l85, monoclonal antibodies to p185 did
`not react with the EGF-r. Moreover,
`there was an apparent molecular weight
`difference of 15,000 daltons between the
`two proteins (2).
`These data raised several possibilities
`regarding the relationship between the
`neu and c-erbB genes. The neu oncogene
`might be a mutated allele of the normal c­
`erbB gene, or it might be derived from a
`normal gene, the sequences of which
`overlap with those of c-erbB. Alterna­
`tively, the neu oncogene might have aris­
`en from a gene that is totally separate
`and distinct from erbB.
`We used three subclones of human c­
`erbB complementary DNA (cDNA) (4)
`and a 0.7-kilobase (kb) subclone of the v­
`erbB oncogene that had been transduced
`by the genome of avian erythroblastosis
`virus (5) for these studies. All of the neu
`oncogene lies within a 34-kb Eco RI
`segment that is present in the genomes of
`normal and tumor rat cells as well as in
`mouse NIH 3T3 cells that have acquired
`a neu oncogene via transfection (2). We
`SCIENCE, VOL. 229
`
`Rat neuroglioblastomas induced by
`exposure in utero to ethylnitrosourea
`frequently carry an oncogene detectable
`Reterenas and NoCa
`upon transfection into NIH 3T3 mouse
`cells (1). This oncogene (which we have
`I. J. M. Bishop, An/IU. Rev. Biochem. 52, 301
`(1983); P. H. Duesbcrg, Nature (London) 394,
`termed neu) was found to be related to c­
`219 (1983).
`
`2. R. F. Doo little et al., Science 221, 275 (1983);
`erbB (2), a gene that encodes the recep­
`
`M. D. Waterfield et al., Nature (London) 394, 35
`tor for epidermal growth factor (EGF-r)
`(1983).
`3. J. Downward et al., Nature (London) Je'1, 521
`(3). The neu oncogene induces the syn­
`(1984).
`thesis of a tumor antigen, p185, which is
`
`4. A. HamJ>C, I. Laprevotle, F. Galibcn, L. A.
`Fedele, C. J. Sherr, Cell 3t, ns (1982); N.
`serologically related to the EGF-r (2).
`
`Kitamura, A. Kitamura, K. Toyoshima, Y. Hir­
`Southern blot analysis of rat DNA
`ayama, M. Yoshida, Nature (London) m. 205
`(1982); M. Shibuya and H. Hanafusa, Cell 30,
`after Eco RI digestion revealed at least
`787 (1982); T. Yamamoto et al., ibid. 35, 71
`(1983).
`two erbB-homologous segments, one of
`976
`
`3 of 3
`
`BI Exhibit 1041
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket