throbber
��
`
`������
`
`M _A_Y_1�986
`� � N_AT_U _R_E_V_O_L_._32_1_29
`�
`
`�
`� � �����
`S=22"-� ��������
`ERSTONATURE
`LETT
`between NMDA and KA (Fig. 3c, d), and in individual
`13. Ault, 8., Evans, R. H., Francis, A. S., Oakes, D. J. & Watkins, J. C. J. Physiol., Lond. 307,
`differed
`413-428 (1980).
`
`spinal cord neurones KA-evoked increases in [Ca2+]; were
`V. & Mayer, M. L. Brain Res. 311, 392-396 (1984).
`14. Crunelli,
`
`15. Hamill, 0. P., Marty, A., Neher, E., Sakmann, B. & Sigworth, F. Pjliigers Arch. ges. Physiol.
`always much smaller than those evoked by NMDA. These
`391, 85-100 (1981).
`
`
`
`
`experiments suggest that Na+ is a poor trigger for inducing an
`S. G. & Ogden, D. C. Proc. R Soc. B224, 367-373 (1985).
`16. Cull.Candy,
`
`
`
`increase in [Caz+L since in several neurones the inward (Na+)
`L. A Rev. Neurosci. 4, 69-125 (1981).
`17. Hagiwara, S. & Bylerly,
`18. Smith, S. J., MacDermott, A. B. & Weight, F. F. Nature 304, 350-352 ( 1983).
`
`
`
`
`
`current activated by KA produced no detectable arsenazo III
`19. Gorman, A. L. F. & Thomas, M. V. J. PhysioL, Lond. 308, 259-285 (1980).
`
`
`
`
`signal. However, our results do not exclude the possibility that
`
`20. Berridge, M. J. & Irvine, R. F. Nature 312, 315-321 (1984).
`& Weiss, S. Nature 317, 717-719 (1985).
`
`21. Sladeczek, F., Pin, J.P., Recasens, M., Bockaert,J.
`
`
`Caz+ influx through ion channels activated by NMDA triggers
`
`22. Schoffelmeer, A. M. N. & Mulder, A.H. J. Neurochem. 40, 615-621 (1983).
`
`
`
`
`release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores27, contributing further
`23. Evans, R.H. & Watkins, J.C. J. Physiol., Lond. 277, 57P (1977).
`24. Nowak, L. M. & Ascher, P. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 10, 23 (1984).
`
`
`
`to the NMDA-evoked arsenazo III signals reported here.
`25. Mayer, M. L. & Westbrook, G. L. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 11, 785 (1985).
`
`
`
`
`Although the present results suggest a high Ca2+ permeability
`26. Ascher, P. & Nowak, L. J. Physiol., Lond. Proc. (in the press).
`
`
`of NMDA-receptor-activated channels (Fig. 3), the net flux of
`27. Fabiato, A. & Fabiato, F. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 307, 491-522 (1978).
`28. Nowak, L. M. & Ascher, P. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 11, 953 (1985).
`
`
`
`
`monovalent cations (that is, conductance) decreases in the pres­
`
`
`F. Nature 305, 719-721 (1983). 29. Lynch, G., Larson, J., Kelso, S., Barrinuevo, G. & Schottler,
`
`
`
`ence of Ca2+. This reflects interactions between permeant ions
`
`30. Collingridge, G. L., Kehl, S. J. & McLennan, H. J. Physiol., Lond. 334, 33-46 (1983).
`31. Parsons, R. L. in Calcium in Drug Action (ed. Weiss, G. B.) 289-314 (Plenum, New York,
`
`within the channel with Ca2+ acting as both a permeant ion and
`1978).
`flux 25·26·28•
`
`
`as a blocker of monovalent cation
`32. Miledi, R. Proc. R Soc. 8209, 447-452 (1980).
`33. Adams, D. J., Dwyer, T. M. & Hille, B. J. gen. Physiol. 75, 493-510 (1980).
`The experiments reported here provide evidence for an
`
`
`
`34. Edwards, C. Neuroscience 7, 1335-1366 (1982).
`
`
`
`agonist-triggered increase in [Caz+]; in mammalian spinal cord
`
`
`
`neurones. Previously, ion-sensitive microelectrodes were used
`
`
`
`to measure changes in intracellular ionic activity triggered by
`
`9. The latter experi­
`
`excitatory amino acids in frog motoneurones
`
`
`
`ments suggested an increase in both [Na+]; and [Ca2+]; during
`
`
`
`perfusion with L-glutamate but the results were difficult to
`as (1) neurones
`
`interpret clearly
`
`were not voltage-clamped and
`
`
`
`thus it is difficult to separate the relative contributions of Ca2+
`
`
`
`
`influx via voltage-dependent calcium channels and agonist-acti­
`Peter T. Jones, Paul H. Dear, Jefferson Foote,
`and (2) L-glutamate
`
`is a mixed agonist that acts
`vated channels,
`Michael S. Neuberger & Greg Winter
`
`
`
`
`at multiple subtypes of excitatory amino-acid receptor2·6·7•
`
`
`
`The response to NMDA-receptor activation thus provides a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`second source of calcium flux, distinct from that resulting from
`
`Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK
`
`
`
`conventional voltage-dependent calcium channels, which may
`
`
`
`have important long-term effects on excitability. Our finding
`
`
`
`that the ion channels linked to the NMDA receptor subtype are
`The variable domains of an antibody consist of a fl-sheet
`
`
`more permeable to Caz+ than those linked to KA receptors, has
`framework with hypervariable regions (or complementarity-deter­
`
`
`
`
`implications for the role of excitatory amino-acid receptors in
`mining regions--CDRs) which fashion the antigen-binding site.
`
`
`
`
`CNS function. It is possible that Caz+ influx activated by NMDA
`Here we attempted to determine whether the antigen-binding site
`
`
`
`
`
`receptors underlies the synaptic plasticity generating long-term
`could be transplanted from one framework to another by grafting
`
`
`
`
`potentiation, as the latter is prevented by intracellular injection
`the CD Rs. We substituted the CD Rs from the heavy-chain variable
`Ca2+ (ref. 29), or by blocking
`of EGTA to chelate
`NMDA
`region of mouse antibody Bl--8, which binds the hapten NP-cap
`(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenacetyl caproic acid; KNP-cap = 1.2 µM), for
`
`
`
`receptors with selective antagonists30. For example, Ca2+ influx
`
`
`localized at transmitter-operated ion channels could have a role
`
`the corresponding CDRs of a human myeloma protein. We report
`
`
`
`
`in organizing and regulating postsynaptic structures in an
`that in combination with the Bl--8 mouse light chain, the new
`
`
`
`
`appropriate spatial relation to transmitter-releasing presynaptic
`antibody has acquired the hapten affinity of the Bl--8 antibody
`
`
`
`
`terminal boutons, and it is important to consider that Ca2+ influx
`
`
`
`
`occurring at NMDA receptors located on dendritic spines might
`of constructing human monoclonal antibodies from the correspond­
`
`
`
`produce an especially large but localized elevation in intracel­
`ing mouse monoclonal antibodies.
`
`
`lular Ca2+ concentration, due to restriction of Ca2+ diffusion
`The three-dimensional structures of several immunoglobulins
`
`
`
`
`along the narrow shaft of the spine. In addition, our results
`
`
`show that the variable domains consist of two /3-sheets pinned
`faces
`
`
`have some bearing on the mechanisms of desensitization of
`
`
`
`together by a disulphide bridge, with their hydrophobic
`
`NMDA receptors, as the link that has been demonstrated
`
`
`
`packed together1-3. The individual /3-strands are linked by loops
`
`which at one tip of the /3-sheet may fashion a binding pocket
`
`
`
`
`between [Caz+]; and desensitization ofnicotinic receptors at the
`
`neuromuscular junction31·32 may occur also for other receptor­
`
`
`
`for small haptens1·2. Sequence comparisons among heavy-and
`domains (V8 and Y1. respectively)
`
`
`
`ionophore complexes. Thus our results may help to explain the
`reveal
`
`light-chain variable
`
`
`similar desensitization evoked by either large doses of NMDA
`that each domain has three CDRs flanked by four relatively
`
`
`
`or depolarizing voltage jumps 7, which trigger Caz+ entry through
`
`
`
`
`conserved regions (framework regions-FRs)4• As seen in the
`
`NMDA channels and voltage-dependent calcium channels,
`
`
`structure of the human myeloma protein NEWM (Fig. 1), the
`respectively.
`CDRs include each of the three main loops. Often the CDRs
`
`
`also include the ends of the /3-strands, suggesting that side
`
`chains at the ends of the /3-strands may help to fix the conforma­
`
`
`tion or orientation of the loops. The framework regions form
`for example in the V8 domain
`the bulk of the /3-sheet, although
`
`of NEWM, FRI includes part of the loop between the two
`/3-sheets and CDR2 not only forms a loop but a complete
`
`(Fig. 1). The structure
`of the /3-sheet framework is
`/3-strand
`
`
`
`
`similar in different antibodies, as the packing of different side
`
`chains is accommodated by slight shifts between the two /3-
`of Y1. and V8 FRs
`
`
`strands5. Furthermore, the packing together
`of Y1. with respect
`to V8
`
`is conserved6, therefore the orientation
`
`is fixed. We wondered whether the FRs represent a simple
`
`/3-sheet scaffold on which new binding sites may be built, and
`
`
`Received 3 January; accepted 1 April 1986.
`
`1. Krogsgaard-Larsen, P., Honore, T., Hansen, J. J., Curtis, D. R. & Lodge, D. Nature 284 ,
`64-66 (1980).
`2. Watkins, J. C. & Evans, R. H. A Rev. Pharmac. Tox. 21, 165-205 (1981).
`3. McLennan, H. Prog. Neurobiol. 20, 251-271 (1983).
`
`
`4. Nowak, L., Bregestovski, P., Ascher, P., Herbet, A. & Prochiantz, A. Nature 307, 462-465
`(1984).
`
`5. Mayer, M. L., Westbrook, G. L. & Guthrie, P. B. Nature 309, 261-263 (1984).
`6. Mayer, M. L. & Westbrook, G. L. J. Physiol., Lond. 354, 29-53 (1984).
`7. Mayer, M. L. & Westbrook, G. L. J. Physiol., Lond. 361, 65-90 (1985).
`
`8. Dingledine, R. J. PhysioL. Lond. 343, 385-405 (1983).
`9. Biihrle, C. P. & Sonnhof, U. Pfliigers Arch. ges. Physiol. 396, 154-162 (1983).
`10. Zanotto, L. & Heinemann, U. Neuroscl Lett. 35, 79-84 (1983).
`11. Pumain, R. & Heinemann, U. J. NeurophysioL 53, 1-16 (1985).
`12. Lansman, J. B., Hess, P. & Tsien, R. W. J. gen. PhysioL (in the press).
`
`Replacing the complementarity­
`determining regions in a human
`antibody with those from a mouse
`
`Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Medical Research Council,
`
`(KNr-cap = 1.9 µM). Such 'CDR replacement' may offer a means
`
`
`
`© Nature Publishing Group1986
`
`1 of 4
`
`BI Exhibit 1033
`
`

`

`�NA�TU�R�E_v�o=L_.�32�1�29�M�A_Y_1_98_6
`
`���������
`
`- LETT ERS TQNATLJRE � ���� � � � �� � ������ �- s2_3
`
`Fig. 1 Stereo pairs of the VH (right)
`and VL (left) domains of the human
`myeloma protein NEWM1•8 gener­
`ated using the computer graphics
`program FROD025. The tracings
`
`indicate the backbone of C" atoms
`for the framework regions.
`a, The C"
`atoms of the CDRs (e) cluster
`at the
`
`tip of the variable domain. b, A view
`into the hapten binding pocket with
`the CDRs in the order (clockwise
`from noon): VH CDR3, CDRl and
`CDR2, and VL CDR3, CDRl and
`
`CDR2. The side chains lining the
`binding pocket (VL A 28, N 30, Y 90,
`S 93, R 95; VH W47, Y50, F52,
`
`I 100, A 101) lie almost entirely in
`the CDRs. c, The C" atoms in the
`NEWM VH domain are marked (e)
`where side chains in the mouse Bl-8
`
`V H domain are different. The side
`chains (VL Y35, Q37, A42, P 43,
`y 86, F 99; VH v 37, Q 39, L 45, y 94,
`
`W 107) involved in packing VH and
`
`
`
`V L framework regions are traced. In
`the VH domain all these side chains
`
`are conserved in mouse Bl-8.
`
`FRI and N-terminal two-thirds of FR3 form the other {:!-sheet
`
`
`
`
`whether the structure of the CDRs (and antigen binding) is
`(Fig. le).
`which is exposed to solvent
`
`
`
`therefore independent of the FR context. To answer these ques­
`The gene encoding the HuVNP domain was constructed by
`
`
`
`
`tions experimentally, we have grafted the CDRs from one anti­
`
`
`
`gene synthesis (Fig. 2b ). We then constructed a plasmid, pSV­
`
`
`
`body to another, to determine whether antigen binding transfers
`Hu VNPHe, in which the HuVNP domain is linked to a humane
`with the CDRs.
`
`
`
`constant region, and cloned into a pSV2gpt-derived vector14.
`
`We grafted the CDRs from the VH domain of the mouse
`Bl-8 (ref. 7) into the VH domain of the
`
`The plasmid DNA was introduced into cells of the J558L mouse
`monoclonal antibody
`A 1 light chains
`
`
`myeloma by spheroplast fusion. J558L secretes
`
`
`human myeloma protein NEWM, whose crystallographic struc­
`
`which have been shown to associate with heavy chains contain­
`
`
`ture is known1•8• The VH domain of the CDR donor (Bl-8) is
`
`attached to a µ, constant
`
`
`ing a MVNP variable domain, to create a binding site for NP-cap
`
`region and associated with a mouse
`A 1 light chain, and the antibody
`
`
`or the related hapten NIP-cap (3-iodo-4-hydroxy-5-nitrophenyl­
`
`
`is directed against the hapten
`
`
`
`acetyl caproic acid)7• As the plasmid pSV-HuVNpHe contains
`NP-cap. Both the VH and VL domains seem to have a role in
`the gpt marker (encoding
`guanine phosphoribosyltransferase),
`
`
`determining the affinity of the antibody for NP-cap as the
`
`
`stably transfected myeloma cells could be selected in medium
`
`
`substitution of either domain by other, often highly related
`domains can destroy hapten binding (refs 7, 9 and
`
`
`
`
`containing mycophenolic acid14; transfectants would be ex­
`variable
`
`
`
`pected to secrete an antibody (HuVNp-IgE) with a heavy chain
`
`
`M.S.N., unpublished results). In the VH domain, each of the
`
`composed of a HuVNP variable domain and human e constant
`
`
`CDRs has been implicated in NP-cap binding10, but the class
`and the A 1 light chain of the J558L myeloma. The
`regions,
`
`
`of constant domains attached to VH does not seem to affect
`gpt+ clones were assayed by
`
`
`culture supematants of several
`
`binding of hapten11•12. The CD Rs from the VH domain of anti­
`
`
`
`radioimmunoassay and found to contain NIP-cap-binding anti­
`body Bl-8 (ref. 13) are longer than the CDRs which they replace
`
`
`body. The antibody secreted by one such clone was purified
`in NEWM4 and this may give rise to a deeper binding pocket.
`
`
`
`from the culture supernatant by affinity chromatography on
`
`
`Most of the residues conserved between the VH domains of
`
`
`NIP-cap-Sepharose, and by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electro­
`
`B 1-8 and NEWM are located in FR2, FR4 and the carboxy­
`
`
`phoresis the protein was indistinguishable from the mouse
`
`
`terminal third of FR3 (Fig. 2a) and largely form the region of
`
`
`chimaeric MVNp-IgE (ref. 12) (results not shown). The HuVNP­
`
`
`
`{:!-sheet which is packed against the light chain. Therefore, it
`
`
`
`IgE antibody competes effectively with MVNp-IgE for binding
`
`might be expected that the VH domain of Bl-8 (hereafter
`
`to both anti-human e (Fig. 3a) and NIP-cap coupled to bovine
`
`abbreviated to MVNP) and the hybrid Bl-8/NEWM domain
`serum albumin (NIP-BSA) (Fig. 3b).
`
`(HuVNP) would dock in a similar manner with the mouse VL
`
`
`domain to form the antigen-combining site6• The more variable
`
`
`The affinities of HuVNp-IgE for NP-cap and NIP-cap were
`
`
`
`© Nature Publishing Group1986
`
`2 of 4
`
`BI Exhibit 1033
`
`

`

`-5�� � � ��
`
`��
`
`� � � ���
`
`� � ��
`
`� LflTE
`
`� ���
`
`��
`
`N_A_TU_R_E� vo_L_. _J2_1_2_9 _M_A_Y�l�98�6
`
`a
`t£un
`8t-8
`
`FAI
`CllR'
`, __ - --
`- - -- 30
`35
`31HDYYT
`
`KUQLQESGPGLURPSQTLSL TCTUSGSTFS
`� QP_!!RE�K!GRSUK�S£KR�Y�T
`SYMnH
`FA2
`4;
`36- - ----
`t£un
`
`MURQPPGRGLEM I G
`81-8
`�KgR�
`
`FA3
`� CllA3 102
`66 - -
`- - - ---94
`t£un
`
`RUTMLUOTSKHQFSLRLSSUTRRDTRUYYCRR
`HLIAGCIOU
`··-·
`KR!L T!!!!KPSSTRYMQ� L,!.SEES�
`
`YDYYGSSYFOY
`FA4
`100-- --113
`.....
`MGQGSLUTUSS
`81-8
`�TTL�
`
`-7
`
`RS TQNATLJR£ � ���
`b
`I H;ndl 11 -48
`-23
`'. .•. . . . .
`ATiiCiWilccrcT-TCTACATOGTfWITATNJOTTTOTCTimi:
`............. Pltft 5lcrts ......._. NtA •tar ts
`CACAAACl\G
`C.ATGAGATCACAGTTCTCTCTACAOTTRCTGAGCRCRCAOGACCTC
`"" l!Ndr
`CllA2
`Spl ic:.
`l50
`6S
`'" 0 W S C I I L F L V ft
`YUFYHGTSDDTTPLRS
`T A rJ!
`RI DPHSGGTKYHEKFKS
`..::CRTGGGA TGGAGCTGTATCATCCTCTTCTTGGTAGCMCAGCT
`ACAGGTAAGGGGC
`TC
`ACllG TROC AOOC rTOIWJGTCTOOACATATATATOOGT GACAA TGACATCCACTTTGCCTT
`Spl ic•
`� P9tl
`10
`1
`
`lo U H S Q U 0 L Q ! E S G P G l U R
`,.
`TCTCTCCACAGG TGTCCllCTCCCAOO TCCAACTGCA GGAGAGCGGTCC
`AGG TCTTGTGAG
`, __ _
`3'
`2��-
`�
`30 CORI
`�
`�
`U � G S T F sCL:Li)
`P S Q T l S l T C r
`ACCTAOCCllOAC
`CCTOAGCCTGACCTQCACCOTOTCT
`OOCAOCACC
`TTCRQCAOCTACTO
`L-7-
`�
`-''-----3
`&------, r----8---
`- 4 ------,
`3'
`45
`40
`50 � 52R
`c:::c:::::Jj]w u . Q p p G . G l. E w I ol• I 0 Pl
`GATGCACT
`GGG TGAGACAGCCACCTGGAC
`GAGG TCTTGAGTGGATT GGAAGGA
`TTGATCC
`--7
`.___J �___...J l--9t>,---J L---11-
`12/ 14-
`-----, r---- 1oa---, ,...----- ICl!t----, r--
`�S COA2
`60
`&�
`70
`I rt s o o T K Y rt E K F K siR v T ,., L u o
`TMTRGTGGTGGTAC1'RAGT
`ACfllllTOAGAAG
`TTCAAOAOCRGAG
`TGRCARTGCTGGTRGA
`--11
`-----' '--t3G---' L.--
`13b� � 15-
`12/14
`16---
`r---
`�
`80
`82A 8 C
`85
`
`T S K H Q F S L R L S S V T R R D T A V
`CACCAGCAAGAAC
`CAOTTCAOCCTGAGACTCAGCAGCGT
`GACAGCC
`GCC GACACCOCGGT
`-tS-..J
`L--
`1Q-
`17
`..-----
`11-----�.-----ro---
`IDS
`� COA3
`IOOfl I C
`'lO
`y y c A Riv 0 y y G s s y F D vlw 0 Q 0
`CTRTTRTTOTOCfWOUftCO'tTTACT
`RCOO TAOTAOCTACTTTORCTACT
`OOOO TCfWJO
`--1Q---'
`'--
`21---J L---
`23-'
`L..-
`r-- 20a -
`..--------:22124
`!Splice
`11� u s s
`s L u
`CAGCCTCGTCACAOTCTCCTCllOGT. . .... IQ:Jbp.
`-25--GACA
`3'
`-, ,-211D -CTGTTCGA s·
`
`Fi1. 2 a, Amino-acid sequence of the VH domain of the human myeloma
`protein NEWM compared with that of the mouse Bl-8 (anti-NP) antibody,
`and divided into FRs and CORs according to Kabat et al.4. Conserved
`residues are marked with a line above and below the residue. b, Amino-acid
`
`and nucleotide sequence of the HuVNP gene, in which the CORs from the
`VH domain of the mouse Bl-8 antibody alternate with the FRs of human
`
`NEWM protein. The gene was constructed by replacing a section of the
`MVNP gene in the vector pSV-VNP (ref. 12) with a synthetic fragment
`
`encoding the HuVNP domain. Thus the 5' and 3' noncoding sequences, the
`
`
`leader sequence, the leader-variable region intron, five N-terminal and four
`C-terminal amino acids are derived from the MVNP gene; the rest of the
`
`coding sequence is derived from the synthetic HuVNP fragment. The oligonu­
`
`
`cleotides are aligned with the corresponding portions of the HuYNr gene.
`
`
`For convenience in cloning, the ends of oligonucleotides 25 and 26b form
`a Hindll site followed by a Hindlll
`site, and the sequences of the 25/26b
`
`
`oligonucleotides therefore differ from the HuYNr gene.
`as a Pstl-Hindlll
`Methods. The synthetic gene for HuVNP was constructed
`
`
`fragment. The nucleotide sequence was derived from the protein sequence
`using the computer program ANAL YSEQ26 with optimal codon usage taken
`made from the sequences of mouse constant-region genes. The oligonucleotides used in synthesis (l-26b28 in total) vary in size from 14 to 59 bases and were
`
`
`
`
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`on a Biosearch SAM or an Applied Biosystems machine, and purified on 8 M urea/ polyacrylamide gels 7• The oligonucleotides were assembled in eight single-stranded
`1, 3, 5 and 7 (block A), 2, 4, 6 and 8 (block A'), 9, 11, 13a and 13b (block B), !Oa, !Ob and 12/14 (block
`
`blocks (A-0 and A'-0') containing oligonucleotides
`B'), 15 and 17 (block C), 16 and 18 (block C'), 19, 21, 23 and 25 (block 0), and 20, 22/24, 26a and 26b (block D'). In a typical assembly, for example of block
`
`
`kinase and mixed with 5 pmol of the terminal oligonucleotide A, 50 pmol of oligonucleotides 1, 3, 5 and 7 were phosphorylated at the 5' end with T4 pol�nucleotide
`
`with 5 µ.Ci of [ y-32P]ATP (Amersham; 3,000 Ci mmol- ). These oligonucleotides
`were annealed by heating to 80 °C and cooling
`which had been phosphorylated
`
`
`
`to room temperature over 30 min with unkinased oligonucleotides 2, 4 and 6 as splints in 150 µ.l of 50 mM Tris-HCI pH 7.5, 10 mM MgC12• For the ligation, ATP
`(I mM) and dithiothreitol
`
`(10 mM) were added, together with 50 units of T4 DNA ligase (Anglian Biotechnology Ltd), and the mixture was incubated for 30 min
`
`
`at room temperature. EDTA was added to 10 mM, the sample extracted with phenol, precipitated from ethanol, dissolved in 20 µ.I of water and boiled for 1 min
`
`with an equal volume of formamide dyes. Then the sample was loaded onto a thin (0.3 mm) 8 M urea/10% polyacrylamide gel27 and a band of the expected size
`
`
`
`detected by autoradiography and eluted by soaking. The two full-length single strands were assembled from A-D and A'-0' using splint oligonucleotides; thus,
`
`
`A-D were annealed and ligated in 30 µ.las above with 100 pmol each of oligonucleotides !Oa, 16 and 20 as splints, then incubated overnight (A'-D' were constructed
`
`
`
`
`with oligonucleotides 7, 13b and 17 as splints). After phenol/ether extraction blocks A-D were annealed with blocks A'-0', small amounts were cloned in the
`vector Ml3 mpl8 (ref. 28) then cut with Psti and Hindlll,
`as a Hindlll-BamHI
`
`and the gene sequenced by the dideoxy technique29• The MVNP gene was transferred
`
`
`
`fragment from the vector pSV-YNr (ref. 12) to the vector Ml3mp8 (ref. 30). To facilitate the replacement of MVNP coding sequences by the synthetic HuVNP
`and a new Hindll site subsequently
`
`introduced near the
`
`fragment, three Hindll sites were removed from the 5' noncoding sequence by site.directed mutagenesis,
`end of FR4. By cutting the vector with Pstl and Hindll, most of the VNP coding sequence falls out and the synthetic
`as a Pstl-Hindll
`fragment could be introduced
`fragment. The sequence at the Hindll site was corrected to give NEWM FR4 by site-directed
`The Hindlll-BamHI
`mutagenesis.
`fragment, now carrying the
`
`
`
`HuVNP gene, was excised from M13 and cloned back into pSV-VNP to replace the MVNP gene (and yield the vector pSV-HuVNp). Finally, the heavy-chain constant
`domains
`into the myeloma line J558L by
`
`of human lgE (ref. 31) were introduced as a BamHI fragment to yield the vector pSV-HuYNrH .. which was transfected
`the Hindlll-BamHI
`fragment back into MJ3mp8 (ref. 30).
`
`spheroplast fusion. The sequence of the HuVNP gene in pSV-HuVNpHE was checked by re-cloning
`
`MVNp-lgE
`HuVNp-lgE
`
`Table 1 Affinity of HuVNp-lgE and MVNp-lgE for the haptens
`NP-cap and NIP-cap
`
`then measured directly using the fluorescence quench technique,
`
`
`
`
`and compared with those ofMVNp-lgE (Table 1). The antibodies
`
`
`HuVNp-lgE and MVNp-lgE have similar affinities for either
`
`
`hapten (NP-cap or NIP-cap), and although the affinity of
`KNP-<:ap (µ.M)
`KN IP-<:ap (µ.M)
`
`
`
`HuVNp-lgE for both haptens is slightly lower than that of MVNP­
`0.02±0.01
`1.2±0.1
`
`
`
`lgE (2-3-fold, 0.3-0.6 kcal mol-1 ), the difference in affinity is
`O.o?±0.02
`1.9±0.2
`
`
`less than expected for loss of either a hydrogen bond or van
`
`
`der Waals' contact from the active site of an enzyme15•16• Thus,
`The affinity of HuVNp-lgE and MVNp-lgE for NP-cap was determined
`
`it seems that binding affinity and specificity for hapten can be
`at 295 nm and emission
`
`
`by ftuorescence quenching with excitation
`
`
`
`conferred on a human antibody by grafting in the CDRs from
`at 340 nm (ref. 22). Antibody solutions
`to 100 nM
`observed
`were diluted
`
`an appropriate mouse antibody.
`(0.45
`in phosphate-buffered saline, filtered
`
`
`µ.m-pore cellulose acetate)
`
`
`
`
`Is this result likely to be general? This would assume (1) that
`with NP-cap in the range 0.2-20
`and titrated
`
`µ.M. As a control, the
`
`
`mouse Dl-3 antibody23, which does not bind hapten, was titrated in
`
`
`
`antigen usually binds to the CD Rs, and any contacts to the FRs
`
`are made to the polypeptide backbone or to conserved side
`
`
`
`
`parallel. A decrease in the ratio of the ftuorescence of HuVNp-lgE or
`MVNp-lgE (as appropriate)
`
`to that of the Dl-3 antibody was taken as
`
`
`chains, and (2) that substitutions in the FRs do not usually
`
`
`
`being proportional to NP-cap occupancy of the antigen-binding sites.
`
`affect the conformation of the CDR loops. These assumptions
`The maximum quench was -40% for both HuVNp-lgE and MVNp-lgE,
`
`
`seem reasonable: thus, in the structure of a complex of the Dl-3
`
`
`
`and hapten dissociation constants were determined from least-squares
`
`
`
`
`antibody with lysozyme (R. A. Mariuzza, S. Phillips and R. J.
`
`
`
`fits of triplicate data sets to a hyperbola. The concentration of NIP-cap
`
`
`
`
`Poljak, personal communication) most contacts to the lysozyme
`was varied from 10 to 300 nM, and -50% quenching
`of ftuorescence
`
`are made by the CDRs, but there is also a hydrogen bond in
`
`
`
`
`was observed at saturation. As the antibody concentrations were compar­
`FRl of the V H domain from the /3-0H ofThr 30 (often conserved
`
`
`able to the values of the dissociation constants, data were fitted by
`
`
`least-squares to an equation24 describing tight binding inhibition.
`
`
`
`or replaced by Ser). Similarly, the conformation of CDR loops
`
`
`
`© Nature Publishing Group1986
`
`3 of 4
`
`BI Exhibit 1033
`
`

`

`100
`
`Anti-human £
`
`� \ \ \ \ \
`\,,...,,,_ ............
`
`\
`
`"u.. __
`
`"- --
`
`Fig. 3 Comparison
`ofHuVNP and MVNP lgEs in binding
`
`
`
`
`inhibition assays. Various concentrations of HuVNp-lgE
`(e) and MVNp-lgE (0) were used to compete the binding
`50
`
`
`
`of radiolabelled MVNP-lgE to polyvinyl microtitre plates
`that had been coated with a, sheep anti-human
`e antiserum
`b, (NIP-cap)i4-BSA;
`c, Ac38 anti­
`(Seward Laboratory);
`d, Ac146 anti-idiotypic
`e,
`
`idiotypic antibody;
`antibody;
`
`
`
`rabbit anti-MVNP antiserum. Binding was also carried out
`
`
`in the presence of MVNp-lgM antibody JWl/2/2 (ref. 32)
`
`(•)as well as in the presence of JW5/1/2 (D), which is
`
`an lgM antibody that differs from JWl/2/2 at 13 residues
`
`mainly located in VH CDR2 (M.S.N., unpublished
`
`
`results). Values of binding are relative to the binding in
`the absence of inhibitor.
`
`50
`
`a
`
`c
`
`[lnhibitor]lµg
`ml-1 l
`
`(ed. Sayre, D.) 303-310 (Clarendon, Oxford,
`
`Regulation of human insulin
`gene expression in transgenic mice
`
`10. Reth, M., Bothwell, A. L. M. & Rajewsky, K. in Immunoglobulin
`between ,B-strands depends on loop size and specific interactions
`
`
`Jdiotypes and Their
`(eds Janeway, C., Wigzell, H. & Fox, C. F.) 169-178 (Academic, New York,
`Expression
`
`
`of the loop back to the ,B-sheet. However, in the same class of
`1981).
`11. Neuberger, M. S. & Rajewsky, K. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 1138-1142 (1981).
`
`
`are usually variable domains (V H• V K or VA) these interactions
`12. Neuberger, M. S. et al. Nature 314, 268-270 (1985).
`
`conserved (ref. 5 and A. M. Lesk and C. Chothia,
`personal
`13. Bothwell, A. L. M. et al. Ce/124, 625-637 (1981).
`communication).
`14. Mulligan, R. C. & Berg, P. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 2072-2076 (1983).
`15. Fersht, A. R. et al. Nature 314, 235-238 (1985).
`
`
`
`While human monoclonal antibodies have therapeutic poten­
`A. J., Carter, P. & Winter, G. Biochemistry
`24, 5858-5861 (1985).
`16. Fersht, A. R., Wilkinson,
`
`
`tial in human disease, they can be difficult to prepare17 and
`17. Boyd, J.E., James, K. & McClelland, D. B. L. Trends Biotechnol.
`2, 70-77 (1984).
`R. M., Smith, L. M. & Dilman, R. 0. J. Immun. 135, 1530-1535
`18. Shawler, D. L., Bartholomew,
`
`
`
`
`treatment of patients with mouse monoclonal antibodies often
`(1985).
`
`
`
`
`increases the titre of circulating antibody against the mouse
`
`19. Morrison, S. L., Johnson, M. J., Herzenberg, L.A. & Oi, V. T. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
`81, 6851-6855 (1984).
`
`
`
`
`immunoglobulin18. As chimaeric antibodies containing human
`20. Boulianne, G. L., Hozumi, N. & Shulman, M. J. Nature 312, 643-646 (1984).
`
`
`constant domains12•19•20 and variable domains made by grafting
`
`T. & Rajewsky, K. Eur. J. lmmun. 9, 1004-1013 (1979).
`21. Reth, M., Imanishi-Kari,
`
`mouse CD Rs into human FRs, could have therapeutic potential,
`22. Eisen, H. N. Meth. med. Res. 10, 115-121 (1964).
`23. Mariuzza, R. A. et al. J. molec. Biol. 170, 1055-1058 (1983).
`
`
`we wondered whether the HuVNp-lgE antibody loses antigenic
`
`24. Segal, I. H. in Enzyme Kinetics, 73-74 (Wiley, New York, 1975).
`
`
`
`determinants associated with the MVNP variable region
`25 Jones, T. A. in Computational
`
`Crystallography
`
`
`(idiotopes). The binding of HuVNP-lgE and MVNp-lgE to both
`1982).
`26. Staden, R. Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 521-538 (1984).
`
`
`
`
`monoclonal and polyclonal anti-idiotypic antibodies directed
`27. Sanger, F. & Coulson, A. FEBS Lett. 87, 107-110 (1978).
`C., Vieira, J. & Messing, J. Gene 33, 103-119 (1985).
`
`against the MV NP domain was examined by using inhibition
`28. Yanisch-Perron,
`29. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. & Coulson, A. R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 5463-5467 (1977).
`
`
`
`assays. As shown in Fig. 3d, the HuVNp-lgE antibody has lost
`30. Messing, J. & Vieira, J. Gene 19, 269-276 (1982).
`
`
`
`
`the MVNP idiotypic determinant recognized by antibody Ac146
`31. Flanagan, J. G. & Rabbitts, T. H. EMBO J. 1, 655-660 (1982).
`32. Neuberger, M. S., Williams, G. T. & Fox, R. 0. Nature 312, 604-608 (1984).
`
`
`
`(ref. 21). Furthermore, HuVNp-lgE also binds the antibody Ac38
`
`
`(ref. 21) less well (Fig. 3c), therefore it is not surprising that
`
`
`
`HuVNp-lgE has lost many of the determinants recognized by a
`
`
`
`polyclonal rabbit anti-idiotypic antiserum (Fig. 3e ). While the
`
`
`
`loss of idiotypic determinants that accompanies 'humanizing'
`
`
`of the VH region is reassuring in view of potential therapeutic
`
`
`
`applications, it does suggest that the recognition of the hapten
`
`
`
`and of anti-idiotypic antibodies is not equivalent. Thus the
`Richard F Selden*, Marek J. Skoskiewiczt,
`
`HuVNp-lgE antibody retains hapten binding but has lost
`Kathleen Burke Howie*, Paul S. Russellt
`
`
`
`
`idiotypic determinants, indicating that the immunoglobulin uses
`& Howard M. Goodman*
`
`
`
`different sites to bind hapten and anti-idiotypic antibodies. It
`
`
`appears, therefore, that both FR and CDR side chains form the
`Departments of *Molecular Biology and tSurgery, Massachusetts
`
`
`
`
`
`binding site for these anti-idiotopes, but mainly CDR side chains
`
`
`
`General Hospital, and Departments of *Genetics and tSurgery,
`
`interact with hapten.
`
`
`Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston,
`
`
`
`We thank C. Milstein for suggesting this project, K. Rajewsky
`
`Massachusetts 02114, USA
`
`
`and M. Reth for the anti-idiotypic antibodies Ac38 and Ac146,
`and A. M. Lesk, C.
`
`
`Chothia, R. J. Leatherbarrow and C. Milstein
`Insulin is a polypeptide hormone of major physiological import­
`
`
`for helpful discussions. J.F. is a Fellow of the Jane Coffin Childs
`ance in the regulation of fuel homeostasis in animals (reviewed in
`Memorial Fund for Medical Research.
`refs 1, 2). It is synthesized by the /J-cells of pancreatic islets, and
`circulating insulin levels are regulated by several small molecules,
`notably glucose, amino acids, fatty acids and certain pharmacologi­
`cal agents. Insulin consists of two polypeptide chains (A and B,
`linked by disulphide bonds) that are derived from the proteolytic
`cleavage of proinsulin, generating equimolar amounts of the
`mature insulin and a connecting peptide (C-peptide). Humans, like
`most vertebrates, contain one proinsulin gene3•4, although several
`species, including mice5 and rats6•7, have two highly homologous
`insulin genes. We have studied the regulation of serum insulin
`
`Received 17 February; accepted 17 March 1986.
`
`1. Poljak, R. J. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70, 3305-3310 (1973).
`2. Segal, D. M. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 71, 4298-4302 (1974).
`J., Huber, R. & Palm, W. J. molec. Biol. 141, 369-391 (1980).
`3. Marquart, M., Oeisenhofer,
`4 Kabat, E. A, Wu, T. T., Bilofsky,
`M. & Perry, H. in Sequences of Proteins
`H., Reid-Miller,
`
`Interest (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1983).
`of Immunological
`5. Lesk, A. M. & Chothia, C. J. molec. Biol. 160, 325-342 (1982).
`R. & Karplus, M. J. molec. Biol. 186, 651-663 (1985).
`6. Chothia, C., Novotny, J., Bruccoleri,
`7. Reth, M., Hiimmerling, G. J. & Rajewsky, K. Eur. J. Immun. 8, 393-400 (1978).
`8. Saul, F. A., Amzel, M. & Poljak, R. J. J. biol. Chem. 253, 585-597 (1978).
`9. Briiggemann, M., Radbruch, A. & Rajewsky, K. EMBO J. 1, 629-634 (1982).
`
`
`
`© Nature Publishing Group1986
`
`4 of 4
`
`BI Exhibit 1033
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket