throbber
Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2010 116: Abstract 3286
`© 2010 American Society of Hematology
`Poster Session
`
`Acute Myeloid Leukemia - Therapy, excluding Transplantation: Poster III
`Update of a Phase I/II Trial of 5-Azacytidine Prior to
`Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) for Patients with Relapsed
`Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Correlative Biomarker
`Studies
`Edward D. Ball, MD1, Bruno C. Medeiros, MD*,2, Larissa Balaian, PhD1, Tracy Roque*,3,
`Sue Corringham*,3, Richa Rajwanshi*,4, Steven Coutre*,4, Jason R Gotlib, MD, MS*,2, Asad
`Bashey, MD, PhD5 and Karen Messer*,3
`
`1 Moores UCSD Cancer Center, Univ. of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA,
`2 Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA,
`3 Moores UCSD Cancer Center, Univ. of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA,
`4 Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA,
`5 BMT Group of Georgia, Atlanta, GA, USA
`
`Abstract 3286
`
`Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells express the cell surface antigen CD33 that is a down-
`regulator of cell growth when ligated by a monoclonal antibody in a Syk-dependent manner. The
`response of AML cells to gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) also depends on Syk and SHP-1
`expression (Leukemia 20:2093, 2006). The hypomethylating agent 5-azacytidine (5-aza) induced
`re-expression of Syk in some cases, therefore increasing the sensitivity of originally Syk-
`negative, non-responsive cells to CD33 ligation to levels of Syk-positive cells. We initiated a
`phase 1/2 clinical trial examining if treatment with 5-aza prior to GO is safe, efficacious, and
`whether in vivo responses to GO correlated with Syk expression and induction by 5-aza. Here we
`update the interim results of this trial (NCI registration number NCT00766116). In Phase I, 14
`patients (9 males, 5 females), age range: 39–82 years [median: 66]) were treated with 75mg/m2
`5-aza daily and GO in a dose-escalation manner, 4 cohorts total. The first cohort (n=3) received
`5-aza for 2 days followed by GO at 3 mg/m2 on days 3 and 17; the second cohort (n=3) received
`5-aza for 2 days followed by GO at 6 mg/m2 on days 3 and 17; the third cohort (n=4) received 5-
`aza for 4 days followed by GO at 6 mg/m2 on days 5 and 19; and the fourth cohort (n=4) at 5-aza
`for 6 days followed by GO at 6 mg/m2 on days 7 and 21. There were no responses in the first 2
`cohorts. One patient in cohort 3 achieved CR, and 2 in cohort 4 achieved CR and CRp. Adverse
`events ( Grade 3) included febrile neutropenia 36%, infection 14%, pancytopenia 7%, dyspnea
`7%, and retinopathy 7%. Average length on study (n=14) was 45 days with a mortality rate of
`14% (unrelated to treatment). No dose-limiting toxicities were encountered in phase I, therefore
`the MTD is the dose in cohort 4. The overall response rate in evaluable patients in phase I (n=11)
`is 27%. Average time to ANC recovery (n=6): 30 days (range 15–42, median 33 days). In Phase
`II, 10 patients (5 males, 5 females), age range: 29–64 years (median 60) were treated at the MTD:
`
`1 of 2
`
`BI Exhibit 1020
`
`

`

`5-aza for 6 days and GO at 6 mg/m2 on days 7 and 21. 8 patients were in 1st relapse, 1 in 2nd and
`1 in 3rd. There were 3 responders (2 CR, 1 CRp) in this phase, all in 1st relapse at baseline.
`Adverse events ( Grade 3) include febrile neutropenia 50%, infection 20%, increased LFTs
`10%, thrombocytopenia 10%, dyspnea 10%, wheezing 10%, mucositis 10%, cough 10%, and
`hypoalbuminemia 10%. The average length on study (n=10) was 40 days with a mortality rate of
`10% (not related to study treatment). Average time to ANC recovery in phase II (n=2): 15 days
`(range 12–17, median 15) with an overall response rate in evaluable patients (n=7) of 43%. The
`ORR for phase I/II (n=18) is 33%. 21 of the 24 patient sample pairs have been analyzed for Syk
`and SHP-1 expression (one patient did not have a baseline sample). Prior to therapy, Syk was
`expressed in 16 of 20 cases. After 5-aza treatment, Syk was re-expressed in all 4 negative cases,
`and increased over baseline in one case that was previously Syk +. SHP-1 was positive in 17 of
`the 20 cases and was re-expressed in all 3 negative cases. Leukemia cells from patients who
`achieved CR were Syk+ in 3 of 5 cases (the 6th hasn't been analyzed). Syk was re-expressed in
`the two negative cases after 5-aza. SHP-1 was expressed in 4 of 5 cases at baseline, and re-
`expressed in the one negative case after 5-aza. In vitro we analyzed inhibition of proliferation (for
`patients 1–6) or colony formation (for patients 7–24) induced by 5-aza and GO. 5-aza alone
`allowed 62.3+/–3.5 survival of leukemia cells and GO alone allowed survival of 59.5+/–1.7
`leukemia cells. However, exposure to both agents resulted in a survival rate of 24.8+/–1.6
`(P<0.05, Students t-test). We also compared pre- and post 5-aza samples from the same patients:
`in all cases 5-aza treatment increased the GO-mediated cytotoxicity from 39.4+/–3.1 to 66.8+/–
`2.4 ((P<0.05, Students t-test). These data show that in vivo exposure to 5-aza can induce the
`expression of two biomarkers involved in the response to GO. This ongoing study indicates the
`combination of 5-aza and GO is well-tolerated, that Syk and SHP-1 are modulated by 5-aza in
`vivo, and that complete responses have been noted with this combination.
`
`Disclosures: Ball: Celgene: Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Will discuss
`use of 5-azacytidine (Vidaza) for treatment of relapsed AML in combination with Mylotarg (on
`label, but only as monotherapy). Medeiros: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;
`Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Genentech: Research
`Funding; Alexion: Speakers Bureau.
`
`Footnotes
`
`* Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.
`
`(cid:3)
`
`2 of 2
`
`BI Exhibit 1020
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket