throbber
Monocyte-and neutrophil-mediated lysis of SCCL by a
`
`
`molecule comprised of Lys3-BN and mAb22
`bispecific
`
`J. Chen•, M. Mokotoffb, J.-H. Zhoua, M.W. Fangerc and E.D. Balla
`
`
`
`
`"Hematology/Bone Marrow Tra11splcmtation, U11iversity of Pi{lsburgh Medical Center and
`
`Pi11sb11rgh Cancer lnstit111e, Pi{lsburgh. PA 15261. U.S.A.
`
`
`
`
`b Department of Plwrmace111ical Sciences. School of Pharmacy, U11ii•ersity of Pi11sb11rgh.
`
`Pi11sb11rgh. PA 15261. U.S.A.
`
`
`
`'"Department of Microbiology. Dartmouth Medical School. Leba11011. NH 03756, U.S.A.
`
`r otroduction
`
`Small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL) grows rapidly, metastasizes early and
`
`
`
`
`eventually causes the death of about 30,000 people per year in the U.S.A. Various
`
`
`
`combinations of chemotherapy have been used with liule improvement in the long-term
`
`
`survival rate. For these reasons recent efforts have focused on developing other
`
`
`
`
`therapeutic strategics for the treatment of SCCL, such as immunological and hormonal
`
`
`therapy [I], and intensive chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow or peripheral
`
`stem cell support (2]. Most human SCCL cell lines produce gastrin releasing peptide
`(GRP), which is similar in action and sequence to bombesin (BN), a peptide from frog
`
`skin. These SCCL cell lines produce GRP and express a single class of high-affinity
`
`receptors for BN/GRP (3].
`As a result of BN/GRP receptors having limited distribution in the body, these
`
`
`
`
`
`
`receptors could serve as targets for directing specific immune reactions. We have
`
`
`developed a novel approach of immunotherapy using the BN/GRP receptors expressed
`
`
`
`IC) molecule (immunoconjugatc, on SCCL cells as targets. We have made a bispccific
`
`between Lys3-BN and a monoclonal antibody (mAb22) [4] against the human high­
`
`
`
`affinity Fe gamma receptor (FcyRI, CD64), which is expressed on the surface of human
`
`
`
`monocytes (Mo) and IFNy-activated polymorphonuclcar neutrophils (PMN). We
`
`
`
`hypothesized that this IC should be able to redirect these immune effector cells towards
`
`SCCL cells and, thus, elicit specific antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity
`(ADCC) of the carcinoma cells.
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`The IC, mAb22-Lys-BN, was obtained by the reaction of Lys3-BN with N-suecinimidyl
`
`
`
`
`S-acetylthioacetate (SAT A). The Lys3-BN-SA TA conjugate was purified by reversed
`
`
`
`
`phase HPLC. Deacetylation to the free sulfhydryl, Lys3-BN-SH, was accomplished with
`
`
`hydroxylamine (NH20H) and purification was performed by HPLC. The antibody
`
`mAb22, or its F(ab'h fragment (Medarcx, Inc.), was reacted with sulfosuccinimidyl
`
`
`4-(N-maleimidomcthyl)-eyclohexanc-l-carboxylatc (Sulfo-SMCC, Pierce) lo produce a
`malcimide-containing
`
`Ab. The final conjugation of Lys3-BN-SH with the maleimidc­
`
`
`
`containing Ab was effected by mixing equimolar amounts overnight at RT.
`The ability of two immunoconjugatcs, mAb22-Lys-BN and F(ab'h-Lys-BN, LO bind
`
`
`
`
`
`to four SCCL cell lines (NCI-H69, H345. SHP-77, and DMS273) was determined by
`
`
`
`now cytometric analysis, using the indirect staining method. The binding was directly
`proportional
`
`to the amount of IC used to stain the cells. This was manifested both by
`
`
`
`an increase in the absolute percentage of cells stained positively and by an augmentation
`
`819
`
`1 of 2
`
`BI Exhibit 1017
`
`

`

`of the mean nuorescence intensity (MR) of the entire cell population. In general. the IC
`
`
`
`
`
`prepared between the whole antibody. mAb22, and Lys '-BN had a higher MR than that
`
`prepared between the F(ab'h fragment and Lys'-BN.
`AOCC assays used target (T) SCCL cells that were incubated with 51Cr. The
`
`
`effector (E) cells, Mo or PMN. were obtained from different donors and activated by
`
`
`
`prior incubation with rlFNy. The cytotoxic potencies varied among donors. In all four
`
`SCCL cell lines. more than 80% of the cells were lysed by Mo from different donors.
`Tumor cell lysis was primarily dependent on the EfT ratio used for each donor. The
`
`achieved at an EfT ratio of
`
`greatest lysis, with either Mo or PMN, was consistently
`
`
`donors, 100:1. About 80% of SHP-77 cells were lysed by PMN from two different
`while with the H69 cells the lysis was about 45%. Since PMN do not express FCyRI
`
`
`on their cell surface without rfFNy stimulation, non-stimulated PMN had much less
`
`cytotoxicity on target cells.
`cytotoxicity was studied under different assay conditions in each of the
`
`
`
`Mo-mediated
`
`
`
`four SCCL cell lines. When the target cells were incubated with activated effector (Mo)
`
`
`cells in the absence of IC, about 15-60% tumor cell lysis was observed, depending upon
`
`donor. The addition of mAb22 did not cause any further cell lysis. However, the addition
`
`
`of IC (mAb22-Lys-BN) resulted in an incrense in tumor cell lysis to about 50-95%. The
`
`IC-induced SCCL cell lysis could be significantly (p < 0.05) blocked by adding an
`
`excess amount of either mAb22 or Lys3-BN. Similarly, with two SCCL lines, PMN
`
`
`tumor cell Iris could be significantly IC-induced blocked by adding an excess amount
`of either mAb22 or Lys -BN.
`
`Conclusions
`
`We have produced a novel IC between mAb22 and Lys3-BN. which binds to BN/GRP
`
`receptors on the cell surface of four SCCL cell lines and to FcyRJ on both human Mo
`
`
`cells and PMN. As hypothesized, IC mAb22-Lys-BN can direct immune effector
`
`
`towards target tumor cells and elicit a specific AOCC, which leads to the lysis of target
`
`
`SCCL cells. This cytotoxicity is dependent on Elf-cell ratios. can be induced in a wide
`
`range of IC concentrations, and can be blocked by the addition of an excess amount of
`
`either parental molecule, mAb22 or Lys3-BN.
`
`References
`
`Avis. 1.L .• Kovacs. T.0.G .. Kasprzyk. PG. Trc,ion. A.M. Banholorncw. R .• Wobh. J.H .. Cuuiua. F.
`
`and Mulshinc. J.L .. J. N:ul. Cancer ln,L. 83(1991)1470
`2 Vredenburgh. JJ. nnd Ball. E.D. Cancer Res .. 50( 1990)7216
`3 M ood y. T.W. and Cuni11a,
`F .. Life Sci. 52( 1993)1161
`4 Guyrc. P.M .. Graziano. R.F .• Vance. B.A .. Morgancllt.
`P.M and Fangcr. M.W. J lmmunol.,
`143( 1989) 1650.
`
`820
`
`2 of 2
`
`BI Exhibit 1017
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket