throbber
PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics 1:74-80 (1986)
`
`The Galactan-Binding Immunoglobulin Fab J539:
`An X-Ray Diffraction Study at 2.6-A Resolution
`
`Se Won Suh, 1 T.N. Bhat,1 Manuel A. Navia, 1 Gerson H. Cohen, 1 D.N. Rao, 2 Stuart Rudikoff,2 and David R. Davies1
`1 Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases and 2 Laboratory of
`Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
`
`search procedure based on the known structure of
`McPC603 Fab. This analysis confirmed the overall
`similarity of these two Fab structures and provided a
`basis for the higher-resolution analysis reported here.
`
`ABSTRACT The crystal structure of the Fab of
`the galactan-binding immunoglobulin J539 (a mouse
`lgA,K) has been determined at a resolution of approx(cid:173)
`imately 2.6 A by X-ray diffraction. The starting
`model was that obtained from the real space search
`described previously (Navia, M.A., Segal, D.M., Pad(cid:173)
`Ian, E.A., Davies, D.R., Rao, D.N., Rudikoff, S. and
`Potter, M. "Crystal structure of galactan-binding
`mouse immunoglobulin J539 Fab at 4.5 A resolu(cid:173)
`tion." Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 76:4071-4074, 1979).
`This Fab structure has now been refined by re(cid:173)
`strained least-squares procedures to an R-value of
`19% for the 11,690 unique reflections between 8.0 A
`and 2.6 A. Therms deviation from ideal bond lengths
`is 0.025 A. The overall structure differs from
`McPC603 Fab, another mouse lgA,K antibody, in that
`the elbow bend, relating the variable and constant
`parts of the molecule, is 145° vs. 133° for McPC603.
`The region of the molecule expected to be the anti(cid:173)
`gen binding site contains a large cavity with two
`clefts leading away from it. This has been fitted with
`a model of an oligo-galactan.
`
`Key words: antibody, crystal structure, anti-galac(cid:173)
`tan, J539
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Current knowledge of the three-dimensional struc(cid:173)
`ture of antibodies is based mostly on the X-ray dif(cid:173)
`fraction investigations of fragments. 1·2 The structures
`of three Fahs have been determined: Kol 3 and New,4
`two human myeloma proteins, and McPC603,5 •6 a
`mouse lgA,K protein. Of these, New and McPC603
`have known binding specificities, while the specific(cid:173)
`ity of Kol is not known. There is therefore only lim(cid:173)
`ited information available concerning the interaction
`of antibodies with their antigenic determinants. In
`this paper we describe the crystal structure determi(cid:173)
`nation of J539, a mouse immunoglobulin Fab with
`binding specificity for /'.l(l-6)-D-galactan. J539 is a
`member of a group of several antigalactans whose
`binding properties have been extensively studied. It
`is the only carbohydrate-binding antibody to have
`been so far studied by X-ray diffraction.
`Previously the structure of J539 Fab had been ana(cid:173)
`lyzed at low resolution. 7 There, a poorly defined 4.5 -
`A electron density map was examined by using a
`
`PUBLISHED 1986 BY ALAN R. LISS, INC.
`
`•
`
`0
`
`0
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Crystallization and Data Collection
`J539 Fab was prepared as described previously,8
`except that the purified material was further sub(cid:173)
`jected to preparative isoelectric focusing in order to
`produce material that would ultimately yield large
`crystals suitable for the production of high-resolution
`X-ray diffraction data.9 The crystallizations were car(cid:173)
`ried out by the hanging drop method at room temper(cid:173)
`ature by using the vapor diffusion technique to
`equilibrate the protein droplet with a solution con(cid:173)
`taining approximately 35% saturated ammonium
`sulfate, 0.07 M imidazole, 0.03 M zinc sulfate, pH 6.8.
`The crystals were orthorhombic, space group P21212i.
`0 7
`with a = 54.1 A, b = 74.2 A, c = 130.8A.
`rotation
`Intensity data were
`collected by
`photography10 on Kodak No-Screen Medical X-ray
`films by using an Elliott GX-6 rotating anode X-ray
`generator operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. A Franks
`double-bent mirror system 11 purchased from Bran(cid:173)
`deis University was used to focus the X-ray beam.
`Data were collected on an Enraf-Nonius Arndt-Won(cid:173)
`acott rotation camera with a nominal 80-mm crystal(cid:173)
`to-film distance. The c-axis of the crystal was parallel
`to the rotation axis of the camera and the rotation
`range for each film pack was 2.3° with 0.3° overlap
`between film packs. This range permitted us to dis(cid:173)
`card the partially recorded reflections. A total rota(cid:173)
`tion of91° was sufficient to record all the independent
`reflections, except for those in the cusp along the c(cid:173)
`axis. Precession camera data for the layers Okl, lkl,
`hOl, hll, h21, hkO, hkl, and hhl were also collected to
`assist in interfilm scaling and to supply some of the
`remaining unobserved reflections.
`
`Received June 3, 1986; accepted June 16, 1986.
`S.W. Suh is now at the Department of Chemistry, College of
`Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
`M.A. Na via is now at the Merck Sharpe and Dohme Research
`Laboratories, Rahway, NJ 07065.
`Address reprint requests to D.R. Davies, Laboratory of Mo(cid:173)
`lecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and
`Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892.
`
`1 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1121
`
`

`

`J539 CRYSTAL STRUCTURE
`
`75
`
`The films were scanned at 100-µm raster steps on
`an Optronics P-IOOO film scanner. The resulting digi(cid:173)
`tal data were processed on a VAX 11/780 computer
`with a rotation film program written by G. Cornick
`and M.A. Navia (unpublished work), which incorpo(cid:173)
`rated the dynamic mask procedure of Sjolin and
`Wlodawer12 to extract the integrated intensities of
`reflections. The program was modified to allow the
`use of roughly measured coordinates of eight strong,
`fully recorded reflections as supplementary fiducial
`marks in obtaining the initial [Q] matrix.13 This pro(cid:173)
`vided a starting transformation for a more accurate
`determination of the [Q] matrix by a least-squares
`procedure based on all fully recorded reflections which
`met certain criteria.
`Intensities from the three films in each pack were
`first scaled, corrected for Lorentz and polarization
`factors, and symmetry averaged. Data from individ(cid:173)
`ual packs were merged and scaled together with those
`from the set of zero- and upper-level precession films
`by using a program of Y. Satow (unpublished work).
`The current data set to 2.6-A resolution contains 8I o/o
`of the possible reflections: 90% to 3.0-A resolution
`and 64% between 3.0-A and 2.6-A resolution. Ap(cid:173)
`proximately 77% of the independent reflections were
`measured more than once. The statistics of the data
`processing are given in Table I.
`
`Generation and Refinement of the Model
`The location and orientation of the starting model7
`were confirmed using the rotation method14 and an
`R-value search. 15•16 Initial refinement of the model
`was carried out by using CORELS. 17 Six parameters
`defining the orientation and position of the molecule
`were refined by using 10-A to 7-A data. Then con(cid:173)
`stant and variable domains were refined as separate
`rigid groups by using IO-A to 5.4-A data. No notice(cid:173)
`able improvement in the R-value was obtained when
`light and heavy chains were also treated as separate
`rigid groups.
`This model was then refined with 3.5-A data by
`using PROLSQ. 18
`•19 Residues of Fv were "mutated"
`from the McPC603 original model to those appropri(cid:173)
`ate for J539 during the course of refinement. As the
`phases improved higher-resolution data were incor(cid:173)
`porated to the limit of 2.6 A and the J539 sequence
`was substituted for the McPC603 residues. The se(cid:173)
`quence used was that of Rudikoff et al.20 for VL, Rao
`et al. 21 for VH, Svasti and Milstein22 and Hamlyn et
`al.23 for CL and Auffi-ay et al.24 for CHI.
`Initial model building was done by using the inter(cid:173)
`active graphics program BILDER25 to fit the model
`to 2Fo-Fc and 6F maps. With the availability of
`the OMITMAP procedure26 the graphics program
`FROD027 was used to fit the model to an OMITMAP.
`This improved the location of a number of residues
`and the overall constrast in the maps increased along
`with the improvement in the phases. During the final
`
`TABLE I. Statistics from Processing of the
`Film Data
`
`Total number of reflections measured
`37,222
`No. of independent reflections
`12,670
`Interfilm scaling R-value*
`0.077
`*R = 2:2: I Ihi - Ih I I 2:2.:Ih, , where Ih is the average intensity
`hi
`hi
`for a given reflection and Ihi isone of the measurements which
`were averaged to yield ih·
`
`passes of model building, 304 water molecules were
`added.
`The result of the final refinement cycle is summa(cid:173)
`rized in Table IL The rms error in positional parame(cid:173)
`ters was estimated to be 0.3 A by the method of
`Luzzati.28 The coordinates and other relevant data
`have been deposited in the Brookhaven Protein Data
`Bank.29 Table III shows the relationship of the serial
`numbering system which we have used in this work
`to the system used by Kabat. 30
`
`RESULTS
`In Figure I is drawn the carbon alpha skeleton of
`the J539 Fab. In overall appearance it resembles the
`structure of other Fahs, in particular McPC603. The
`pairs of domains, CHI and CL, are quite similar,
`having 88 carbon alphas match to give an rms differ(cid:173)
`ence of I.8 A. The relation between CHI and CL is
`that of a screw axis with a rotation of I 7 4 ° and a
`translation of 1.9 A. Similarly, with VH and VL, 99
`pairs of carbon alphas match with an rms deviation
`of 1.6 A to give a rotation of 169.4° and 0.04-A
`translation.
`As expected from their sequence identity, the con(cid:173)
`stant domains of J539 resemble quite closely the two
`corresponding domains of McPC603. The rms devia(cid:173)
`tion of the backbone atoms is 1.6 A (2.1 A for all
`atoms). The relative disposition of CL and CHI in
`J539 and McPC603 is not, however, exactly the same.
`For McPC603 the screw relation between CL and
`CHl corresponds to a I69° rotation with a 2.6-A
`translation. In the region of residues I3I-139 (J539
`numbering) there appears to be a major difference in
`the folding of the two CHI domains. This region in(cid:173)
`cludes a proline residue that has been interpreted to
`be a cis-proline in McPC603 but trans- in J539. We do
`not know whether these differences are the result of
`an inadequate analysis of weak electron density or
`represent real differences in structure. We are under(cid:173)
`taking a higher resolution study of J539 in order to
`attempt to clarify this situation.
`The angle between the constant and variable pairs
`of domains differs between J539 (I45°) and McPC603
`(133°). This angle, the "elbow bend" of the Fab,31•32
`has been found to be quite variable in different Fahs,
`going from about 133° in New and McPC603 to as
`much as I70° in the Fab Kol,3 probably signify-
`
`2 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1121
`
`

`

`76
`
`S. W. SUH ET AL.
`
`TABLE II. Refinement Data
`
`Actual rms
`deviationt
`
`Target
`a
`
`Average .::lF
`R-factor*
`No. of structure factors
`rms deviations from ideal distance (A)
`Bond distance
`Angle distance
`Planar 1-4 distance
`rms deviation from planarity (A)
`rms deviation from ideal chirality cA 3)
`rms deviation from permitted contact distances (A)
`Single torsion contacts
`Multiple torsion contacts
`Possible hydrogen bond
`rms deviation from ideal torsion angles (0
`For planar group (0 or 180)
`For staggered group (±60 or 180)
`For orthonormal group (±90)
`*R = I I IF o I - IF, I I /I IF o I.
`h
`h
`trms = root mean square.
`:j:The weight chosen for the structure factor refinement, the "target a" of ~F, was modeled by the function w = (liu)2 with a= 47 -
`230 x (sin (O)/'/.. - 116).
`
`0.030
`0.040
`0.030
`0.025
`0.150
`
`0.500
`0.500
`0.500
`
`3.0
`15.0
`15.0
`
`92.6
`0.19
`11,690
`
`0.025
`0.052
`0.029
`0.016
`0.199
`
`0.219
`0.289
`0.269
`
`2.5
`26.0
`22.3
`
`)
`
`ing flexibility in the polypeptide chains between V
`andC.
`The interdomain contacts are summarized in Ta(cid:173)
`bles IV and V. These tables show, for each residue,
`the number of atom pairs in contact with residues of
`the other chain. A contact is defined as a distance
`which is less than the sum of the atomic van der
`Waals radii33 plus LOA. Similar tables have been
`published for the McPC603 Fab6 and we note that
`while the contacts between CL and CHl are rela(cid:173)
`tively preserved, the contacts between VL and VH
`
`TABLE III. Correspondence Between the Numbering
`Scheme Used Here and That of Kabat et al. 30
`
`Heavy chain
`Light chain
`This paper Kabat et al. This paper Kabat et al.
`
`1-27
`28-213
`
`1-27
`29-214
`
`1-52
`53
`54-83
`84-86
`87-104
`105
`106-135
`136-138
`139-159
`160-167
`168-180
`181-196
`197-201
`202-212
`213-218
`
`1-52
`52a
`53-82
`82a-82c
`83-100
`lOOa
`101-130
`133-135
`137-157
`162-169
`171-183
`185-200
`202-206
`208-218
`220-225
`
`contain significant differences, perhaps because of dif(cid:173)
`ferences in the hypervariable regions. In J539 some
`32 out of 86 interactions (37%) involve hypervariable
`residues only, compared with 46 out of 105 (44%) in
`McPC603. However, many of the same conserved res(cid:173)
`idues found by Novotny and Haber34 are also found
`here, making contacts across the interface. These in(cid:173)
`clude Y35, Q37, Y86, and F97 of the light chain and
`Q39, L45, W47, Y95, and W108 of the heavy chain.
`
`The Galactan Binding Site
`The binding of galactan in J539 has been exten(cid:173)
`sively studied in solution by Glaudemans and his co(cid:173)
`workers. The antibody combining site was shown to
`accommodate four sequential /3(1-6)-galactopyranosy 1
`residues.35- 37 Recently, Glaudemans et al.38 have
`concluded from a binding study of a number of deoxy(cid:173)
`fluorogalactosides that the binding involves both of
`the two solvent-exposed tryptophans in the combin(cid:173)
`ing site (residues W92L and W33H). They also pro(cid:173)
`posed a rather specific model for the orientation of
`the galactan on the surface of the antibody molecule.
`In this crystal form of J539 the presumed binding
`site for galactan is in close proximity to the constant
`region of a neighboring molecule (Table VI). Probably
`because of this close contact our attempts to diffuse
`galactan into these crystals were unsuccessful. Thus
`we have no direct crystallographic evidence to define
`the binding pocket of the Fab. Nevertheless, the three(cid:173)
`dimensional structure of the variable module does
`provide some clues. Figure 2 is a skeletal model of
`J539 showing just the complementarity determining
`
`3 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1121
`
`

`

`J539 CRYSTAL STRUCTURE
`
`77
`
`Fig. 1. A stereo drawing of the alpha carbon skeleton of J539 Fab. Solid bonds indicate the heavy chain.
`Filled circles show the complementarity determining residues. 30
`
`residues. A large pocket formed mainly by the CDRs
`of the light and heavy chain can be seen clearly, and
`connected to it there are two grooves. The bottom of
`the pocket is formed mainly by residues l95L, E50H,
`and L99H. Residues W33H, H52H, W90L, and Y92L
`line the side of the pocket. Residues YlOlH, Y104H,
`and Y92L form the outer surface of the pocket. Resi(cid:173)
`dues Y92L and P93L partition the large pocket into
`one central deep pocket and two clefts on either side.
`Residues S30L, T91L, and Y92L form one of these
`clefts and W33H, D54H, Y92L, and H52H form the
`other cleft.
`
`Binding experiments39 demonstrate that J539 binds
`to the middle of the galactan polymer, rather than at
`the ends. Accordingly, we have examined models con(cid:173)
`structed by placing several galactan residues partly
`in the central cavity with the chain extending away
`from the cavity in both directions along the two
`grooves.
`Several conformations of galactan could be reason(cid:173)
`ably fitted to the binding pocket based on a consider(cid:173)
`ation of van der Waals contacts alone. They could be
`constructed with the carbohydrate chain running in
`either direction. One of these, shown in Figure 3, is
`
`TABLE IV. Contacts Between Residues of VL and VH*
`
`V37 Q39 G44 L45 W47 E50 H52 N59 Y60 P62 Y95 L99 Y104 N105 W108 G109
`
`1
`E
`H 33
`35
`y
`Q 37
`s 42
`43
`p
`45
`p
`48
`y
`86
`y
`w 90
`92
`y
`93
`p
`94
`L
`95
`I
`97
`F
`
`2
`
`4
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`1
`5
`
`1
`
`1
`2
`
`2
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`4
`
`8
`
`11
`4
`
`1
`
`*Residues listed in the left column are from VL; the residues listed above the columns are from VH. The numbers in the table
`correspond to the number of pairs of atoms from two residues which are within potential van der Waals contact distance. A dot(-)
`indicates no contacts. The boxed regions delineate possible hypervariable to hypervariable interactions.
`
`4 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1121
`
`

`

`78
`
`S.W. SUH ET AL.
`
`TABLE V. Contacts Between Residues of CL and CHI*
`1141 L145 H147 F171 P172 A174 Q186
`Y127 P128 L129 T130 L131 P132 Pl33
`
`1
`3
`
`2
`12
`1
`
`6
`
`2
`
`1
`
`4
`16
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`1
`
`s 115
`I
`116
`117
`F
`s 120
`122
`E
`Q 123
`s 126
`s 130
`v 132
`134
`F
`N 136
`L 159
`N 160
`s 161
`w 162
`163
`T
`s 173
`M 174
`s 175
`5
`E 212
`*Residues listed in the left column are from CL; the residues listed above the columns are from CHl. The numbers in the table
`correspond to the number of pairs of atoms from two residues which are within potential van der Waals contact distance. A dot
`indicates no contacts.
`
`5
`4
`
`2
`1
`1
`
`2
`2
`
`4
`
`2
`3
`1
`3
`
`similar in general terms to the model proposed by
`Glaudemans et al.40 The preliminary and tentative
`nature of this model should be emphasized. It was
`constructed simply by fitting the galactan into the
`combining site in a manner that would avoid bad
`nonbonded contacts, but without taking into account
`possible hydrogen bonds and without minimizing the
`energy of contact. The great flexibility of the /3(1-6)
`carbohydrate linkage facilitates the fitting of these
`models but at the same time reduces the probability
`of obtaining a unique model. We are at present trying
`to grow crystals of J539 from solutions containing
`various oligogalactans; in this way we hope to ob-
`
`TABLE VI. Contacts Between Residues of Two
`Molecules Related by a Twofold Screw Axis Parallel
`to the z Unit Cell Edge*
`
`Y92 H52 D54 855 T57 HlOO YlOl Y104
`
`7
`19
`
`1
`
`2
`
`1
`
`s 137
`D 138
`v 192 10
`E 196
`1
`1
`9
`*Residues listed in the left column are from CHl of one
`molecule; the residues listed above the columns are from a
`neighboring molecule and are from VL (Y92) and VH. The
`residues Y92L, H52H, D54H, YlOlH, and Yl04H are involved
`in the putative hapten binding pocket. The numbers in the
`table correspond to the number of pairs of atoms from two
`residues which are within potential van der Waals contact
`distance. A dot indicates no contacts.
`
`serve directly, although probably in a different crys(cid:173)
`tal form, the manner in which the antibody binds to
`the galactan.
`
`Comparison With Predicted Models of J539
`The variable region of J539 has been the subject of
`numerous modeling attempts. These have ranged
`from simple backbone models to fairly complete
`models for all the atoms in the combining site
`42 (Padlan, Glaudemans, and Davies, unpub(cid:173)
`region41
`•
`lished). We have compared several of these models
`with the observed structure derived from X-ray dif(cid:173)
`fraction. Although in many of the CDR loops the
`models show quite good agreement with the X-ray
`structure, there are always some loops that show very
`poor agreement. As an example, we quote the com(cid:173)
`parison for the model proposed by Mainhart et al.,41
`whose coordinates were kindly given to us by Main(cid:173)
`hart. We observe an rms deviation for the alpha car(cid:173)
`bons of 2. 7 A for all the heavy-chain CD Rs and 1.8 A
`for the light-chain CDRs. For the individual CDRs,
`the alpha carbon rms deviations range from 1.1 A for
`Hl and L2 to 4.0 A for H3. If all the atoms are
`included, then the deviations are 4.6 A and 3.0 A for
`the heavy- and light-chain CDRs, respectively. The
`rms deviations for the individual CDRs range from
`2.0 A and 2.1 A for Ll and L2 to 3.9 A for Hl and
`L3 and 6.5 A for H3. Similar deviations are found in
`other predicted models. These large discrepancies be(cid:173)
`tween prediction and observation for key parts of the
`combining site, in spite of encouraging agreement in
`other parts, are probably due to inadequacies in the
`
`5 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1121
`
`

`

`J539 CRYSTAL STRUCTURE
`
`79
`
`Fig. 2. A stereo diagram of the complementarity determining residues (CDRs)30 of J539. Alternate CDRs
`are drawn with a bold line. All residues of the CDRs have been included.
`
`Fig. 3. A stereo drawing of the residues which form the surface of the suggested galactan-binding pocket
`of J539. A model of a penta-/l(l-6}-galactan which was fitted into this pocket in a manner that would avoid
`bad nonbonded contacts is shown by using filled bonds. The reducing end of the galactan is toward the left
`of the figure, consistent with the results from solution studles.40
`
`present state of modeling procedures. However, we
`cannot rule out the possibility that there are distor(cid:173)
`tions in the conformations of the hypervariable loops
`of the observed crystal structure as a result of the
`close contact with the neighboring molecule in the
`crystal.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Davies, D.R., Metzger, H . Structural basis of antibody func(cid:173)
`tion. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 1:87-117, 1983.
`2. Amzel. L.M., Poljak, R.J. Three-dimensional structure of
`immunoglobulins. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 48:961-997, 1979.
`3. Marquart, M., Deisenhofer, J ., Huber, R., Palm, W. Crystal(cid:173)
`lographic refinement and atomic models of the intact im(cid:173)
`its antigen-binding
`munoglobulin mqlecule Kol • and
`fragment at 3.0 A and 1.9 A r esolution. J. Mo!. Biol.
`141:369-391, 1980.
`1. Saul, F.A., Amzel, L.M., Poljak, R.J. Preliminary refine(cid:173)
`ment and structural analysis of the Fab fragment from
`human immunoglobulin New at 2.0 A. J. Biol. Chem.
`253:585-597, 1978.
`5. Segal, D.M. , Padlan, E.A., Cohen, G.H., Rudikoff, S., Potter,
`M., Davies, D.R. The three-dimensional structure of a phos-
`
`phocholine-binding mouse immunoglobulin Fab and the na(cid:173)
`ture of the antigen binding site. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`71:4298-4302, 1974.
`6. Satow, Y., Cohen, G.H., Padlan, E.A. , Davies, D.R. The
`phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin Fab McPC603: An
`X-ray diffraction study at 2.7 A . J . Mo!. Biol. (in press)
`1986.
`7. Navia, M.A., Segal, D.M. , Padlan, E.A., Davies, D.R. , Rao,
`D.N., Rudikoff, S., Potter, M. Crystal structure of galactan(cid:173)
`binding mouse immunoglobulin J539 Fab at 4.5 A resolu(cid:173)
`tion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:4071-4074, 1979.
`8. Rudikoff, S., Potter, M., Segal, D.M., Padlan, E.A., Davies,
`D.R. Crystals of phosphorylcholine-binding Fab-fragments
`from mouse myeloma proteins: Preparation and X-ray anal(cid:173)
`ysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69:3689-3692, 1972.
`9. Bott, R., Navia, M.A., Smith, J.L. Improving the quality of
`protein crystals through purification by isoelectric focus(cid:173)
`ing. J. Biol. Chem. 257:9883-9886, 1982.
`10. Arndt, U.W., Wonacott, A.J. (eds.) "The Rotation Method in
`Crystallography." Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1977.
`11. Harrison, S.C. A point-focussing camera for single crystal
`diffraction. J . Appl. Cryst. 1:84-90, 1968.
`12. Sjolin, L., Wlodawer, A. Improved technique for peak inte(cid:173)
`gration for crystallographic data collected with position(cid:173)
`sensitive detectors: A dynamic mask procedure. Acta Cryst.
`Series A 37:594-604, 1981.
`
`6 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1121
`
`

`

`80
`
`S.W. SUH ET AL.
`
`13. Rossman, M.G. Processing oscillation diffraction data for
`very large unit cells with an automatic convolution tech(cid:173)
`nique and profile fitting. J_ Appl. Cryst. 12:225-238, 1979.
`14. Crowther, R.A. The fast rotation function. In: "The Molec(cid:173)
`ular Replacement Method." Rossmann, M.G. (ed.) New York:
`Gordon and Breach. 1972:173-178.
`15. Bott, R., Sarma, R. Crystal structure of turkey egg-white
`lysozyme: Results of the molecular replacement method at
`5 A resolution. J. Mo!. Biol. 106:1037-1046, 1976.
`16. Rae, A.D. The use of structure factors to find the origin of
`an oriented molecular fragment. Acta Cryst. Series A
`33:423-425, 1977.
`17. Sussman, J.L., Holbrook, S.R., Church, G.M., Kim, S.-H. A
`structure-factor least-squares refinement procedure for
`macromolecular structures using constrained and re(cid:173)
`strained parameters. Acta Cryst. Series A 33:800-804, 1977.
`18. Hendrickson, W.A. Stereochemically restrained refinement
`of macromolecular structures. In: "Methods in Enzymol(cid:173)
`ogy." Wyckoff, H.W., Hirs, C.H.W., Timasheff, S.N. (eds.)
`Vol 115. Orlando: Academic Press. 1985:252-270.
`19. Hendrickson, W.A., Konnert, J.H. Incorporation of stereo(cid:173)
`chemical information into crystallographic refinement. In:
`"Computing in Crystallography." Diamond, R., Rama(cid:173)
`seshan, S., Venkatesen, K. (eds.) Bangalore: Indian Acad(cid:173)
`emy of Sciences. 1980:13.01-13.23.
`20. Rudikoff, S., Rao, D.N., Glaudemans, C.P.J., Potter, M. K
`chain joining segments and structural diversity of antibody
`combining sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:4270-4274,
`1980.
`21. Rao, D.N., Rudikoff, S., Krutzsch, H., Potter, M. Structural
`evidence for independent joining region gene in immuno(cid:173)
`glogulin heavy chains from anti-galactan myeloma pro(cid:173)
`teins and its potential role in generating diversity in com(cid:173)
`plementarity-determining regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci
`USA 76:2890-2894, 1979.
`22. Svasti, J., Milstein, C. The complete amino acid sequence
`of a mouse K light chain. Biochem. J. 128:427-444, 1972.
`23. Hamlyn, P.H., Brownlee, G.G., Cheng, C.-C., Gait, M.J.,
`Milstein, C. Complete sequence of constant and 3' noncod(cid:173)
`ing regions of an immunoglobulin mRNA using the dideox(cid:173)
`ynucleotide method of RNA sequencing. Cell 15:1067-1075,
`1978.
`24. Auffray, C., Nageotte, R., Sikorav, J.-L., Heidmann, 0.,
`Rougeon, F. Mouse immunoglobulin A: Nucleotide se(cid:173)
`quence of the structural gene for the a heavy chain derived
`from cloned cDNAs. Gene 13:365-374, 1981.
`25. Diamond, R. BILDER: A computer graphics program for
`biopolymers and its application to the interpretation of th.e
`structure of tobacco mosaic virus protein disc at 2.7 A
`resolution. In: "Biomolecular Structure, Function, Confor(cid:173)
`mation and Evolution." Srinivasan, R. (ed.) Vol. 1. Oxford:
`Pergamon Press. 1981:567-590.
`26. Bhat, T.N., Cohen, G.H. OMITMAP: An electron density
`map suitable for the examination of errors in a macromo(cid:173)
`lecular model. J. Appl. Cryst. 17:244-248, 1984.
`27. Jones, T.A. A graphics model building and refinement sys-
`
`tern for macromolecules. J. Appl. Cryst. 11:268-272, 1978.
`28. Luzzati, V. Traitment statistique des errors dans la deter(cid:173)
`mination des structures cristallines. Acta Cryst. 5:802-810,
`1952.
`29. Bernstein, F.C., Koetzle, T.F., Williams, G.J.B., Meyer, E.F.,
`Brice, M.D., Rogers, J.R., Kennard, 0., Shimanouchi, T.,
`Tasumi, M. The protein data bank: A computer-based ar(cid:173)
`chival for macromolecular structures. J. Mo!. Biol. 112:535-
`542, 1977.
`30. Kabat, E.A., Wu, T.T., Bilofsky, H., Reid-Miller, M., Perry,
`H. (eds.) Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest.
`Washington: United States Department on Health and Hu(cid:173)
`man Services, 1983.
`31. Huber, R., Deisenhofer, J., Colman, P.M., Matsushima, M.,
`Palm, W. Crystallographic structure studies of an IgG mol(cid:173)
`ecule and an Fe fragment. Nature 264:415-420, 1976.
`32. Colman, P.M., Deisenhofer, J., Huber, R., Palm, W. Struc(cid:173)
`ture of the human antibody molecule Kol (Immunoglobulin
`Gl): An electron density map at 5 A resolution. J. Mo!.
`Biol. 100:257-282, 1976.
`33. Case, D.A., Karplus, M. Dynamics of ligand binding to
`heme proteins. J. Mo!. Biol. 132:343-368, 1979.
`34. Novotny, J., Haber, E. Structural invariants of antigen
`binding: Comparison of immunoglobulin VL-VH and VL(cid:173)
`VL domain dimers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:4592-
`4596, 1985.
`35. Jolley, M.E., Rudikoff, S., Potter, M., Glaudemans, C.P.J.
`Spectral changes on binding of oligosaccharides to murine
`IgA myeloma proteins. Biochemistry 12:3039-3044, 1973.
`36. Manjula, B.N., Mushinski, E.B. and Glaudemans, C.P.J.
`The formation of active hybrid immunoglobulins from the
`heavy and light chains of /3(1,6)-D-galactan binding murine
`myeloma IgA's SlO and J539. J. Immunol. 119:867-871,
`1979.
`37. Roy, A., Manjula, B.N., Glaudemans, C.P.J. The interaction
`of two polysaccharides containing /3(1,6)-linked galactopyr(cid:173)
`anosyl residues with two monoclonal antigalactan immu(cid:173)
`noglobulin Fab' fragments. Mo!. Immunol. 18:79-84, 1981.
`38. Glaudemans, C.P.J., Kovac, P., Rasmussen, K. Maping of
`the subsites in the combining area of monoclonal antigalac(cid:173)
`tan IgA J539. Biochemistry 23:6732-6736, 1984.
`39. Glaudemans, C.P.J., Bhattachargee, A.K., Manjula, B.N.
`Monoclonal anti-galactan IgA J539 binds intercatenarily
`to its polysaccharide antigen. Observations on the binding
`of antibody to a macromolecular antigen. Mo!. Immunol.
`(in press), 1986.
`40. Glaudemans, C.P.J., Kovac, P. Probing the combining site
`of monoclonal IgA J539 using deoxyfluoro- and other gal(cid:173)
`actosides as ligands. Mo!. Immunol. 22:651-653, 1985.
`41. Mainhart, C.R., Potter, M., Feldmann, R.J. A refined model
`for the variable domains (Fv) of the J539 /3(1,6)-D-galactan(cid:173)
`binding immunoglobulin. Mo!. Immunol. 21:469-478, 1984.
`42. Stanford, J.M., Wu, T.T. A predictive method for determin(cid:173)
`ing possible three-dimensional folding of immunoglobulin
`backbones around antibody combining sites. J. Theor. Biol.
`88:421-439, 1981.
`
`7 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1121
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket