throbber
J. Mol. Biol. (1991) 217, 133-151
`
`Structure, Function and Properties of
`Antibody Binding Sites
`
`I. Saira Mian1t, Arthur R. Bradwell2 and Arthur J. Olson1j
`
`1 Department of Molecular Biology
`Research Institute of Scripps Clinic
`10666 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, U.S.A.
`2 Department of Immunology
`Medical School, Birmingham University, B15 2TJ, U.K.
`
`(Received 16 May 1990; accepted 19 July 1990)
`
`Do antibody combining sites possess general properties that enable them to bind different
`antigens with varying affinities and to bind novel antigens? Here, we address this question
`by examining the physical and chemical characteristics most favourable for residues
`involved in antigen accommodation and binding. Amphipathic amino acids could readily
`tolerate the change of environment from hydrophilic to hydrophobic that occurs upon
`antibody-antigen complex formation. Residues that are large and can participate in a wide
`variety of van der Waals' and electrostatic interactions would permit binding to a range of
`antigens. Amino acids with flexible side-chains could generate a structurally plastic region,
`i.e. a binding site possessing the ability to mould itself around the antigen to improve
`complementarity of the interacting surfaces. Hence, antibodies could bind to an array of
`novel antigens using a limited set of residues interspersed with more unique residues to
`which greater binding specificity can be attributed. An individual antibody molecule could
`thus be cross-reactive and have the capacity to bind structurally similar ligands. The
`accommodation of variations in antigenic structure by modest combining site flexibility
`could make an important contribution to immune defence by allowing antibody binding to
`distinct but closely related pathogens.
`Tyr and Trp most readily fulfil these catholic physicochemical requirements and thus
`would be expected to be common in combining sites on theoretical grounds. Experimental
`support for this comes from three sources, (1) the high frequency of participation by these
`amino acids in the antigen binding observed in six crystallographically determined
`antibody-antigen complexes, (2) their frequent occurrence in the putative binding regions
`of antibodies as determined from structural and sequence data and (3) the potential for
`movement of their side-chains in known antibody binding sites and model systems. The six
`bound antigens comprise two small different haptens, non-overlapping regions of the same
`large protein and a 19 amino acid residue peptide. Out of a total of 85 complementarity
`determining region positions, only 37 locations (plus 3 framework) are directly involved in
`antigen interaction. Of these, light chain residue 91 is utilized by all the complexes
`examined, whilst light chain 32, light chain 96 and heavy chain 33 are employed by five out
`of the six. The binding sites in known antibody-antigen complexes as well as the postulated
`combining sites in free Fab fragments show similar characteristics with regard to the types
`of amino acids present. The possible role of other amino acids is also assessed. Potential
`implications for the combining regions of class I major histocompatibility molecules and the
`rational design of molecules are discussed.
`
`t Present address: Sinsheimer Laboratory, Biology
`Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa
`Cruz, CA 95064, U.S.A.
`t _._A1uthor to "vhom reprint requests should be
`addressed.
`§Abbreviations used: CDR, complementarity
`determining region; MHC, major histocompatibility
`complex; FR, framework.
`
`0022-2836/91/010133-19 $03.00/0
`
`1. Introduction
`Antibodies are powerful recognition and binding
`molecules that the immune system employs to
`eliminate foreign molecules. Antibody binding sites
`are formed by six hypervariable loops or comple(cid:173)
`mentarity determining regions (CDRs§). The CDRs,
`133
`
`© 1991 Academic Press Limited
`
`1 of 19
`
`BI Exhibit 1114
`
`

`

`134
`
`I. S. Mian et al.
`
`three from each of the heavy and light chain vari(cid:173)
`able domains, are connected to a relatively invar(cid:173)
`iant /3-sheet framework (Alzari et al., 1988; Davies &
`Metzger, 1983; Capra & Edmundson, 1977; Wu &
`Kabat, 1970). Early analysis of a data bank of
`complete and partial sequences of 415 light and 197
`heavy chains demonstrated that CDRs are rich in
`(Kabat et al., 1977). The
`residues
`aromatic
`combining region represents only a small part of the
`antibody molecule, whose overall three-dimensional
`structure is highly conserved. Although, the pairing
`of light and heavy chains can generate some anti(cid:173)
`body diversity, most of it is generated by the
`somatic recombination of variable region gene
`segments (Yancopoulos & Alt, 1986; Wysocki &
`Gefter, 1989). Such genetic mechanisms yield anti(cid:173)
`bodies exhibiting extensive diversity in hyper(cid:173)
`variable loop sequences. This potential repertoire is
`estimated to be approximately 109 in mouse (Berek
`et al. , 1985). However, the initial repertoire that
`confronts an antigenic challenge is smaller than the
`potential repertoire, since it is restricted to the
`existing
`on
`expressed
`specificities
`antibody
`immunocompetent B cells at a point in time
`(Holmberg et al., 1986). This available repertoire
`can yield an apparently unlimited repertoire of
`antigen binding specificities and affinities.
`Although a single antibody has a unique three(cid:173)
`dimensional structure, biophysical and biochemical
`evidence indicates that it is multispecific or cross(cid:173)
`reactive (Richards et al. , 1975). This capacity to
`combine both with its inducing antigen and with
`antigens of similar or disparate structure augments
`the genetically determined antigen-binding capabili(cid:173)
`ties of antibodies. The extent of molecular comple(cid:173)
`mentarity between determinants on the antigen
`molecule and amino acid residues in the combining
`site determines the degree of antibody specificity.
`the
`is at
`therefore,
`Increased cross-reactivity,
`expense of specificity and affinity.
`An improved understanding of both antibody
`cross-reactivity and binding can be obtained by a
`interactions at the
`study of antibody-antigen
`atomic level. The role of residues in the definition of
`interaction with
`combining site structure and
`antigen can be assessed as a function of the chemical
`and structural properties of individual amino acids.
`First, we examine those characteristics that appear
`to be of general importance in antibody- antigen
`interactions. This is followed by a detailed study of
`the binding sites in six antibody-antigen complexes
`and four free Fab fragments of known three-dimen(cid:173)
`sional structure, and the much larger database of
`antibody sequences. Padlan (1990) has performed a
`similar, though not identical , analysis of antibody
`combining sites in general, and three anti-lysozyme
`antibody-antigen complexes in particular. On the
`basis of their propensity to occur in the combining
`sites and their greater exposure relative to those in
`the framework regions, he has suggested that these
`amino acids determine specificity. Our results and
`their interpretation lead us to conclude that Tyr
`residues may play more generally important roles in
`
`and
`binding
`interactions.
`
`non-specific
`
`antibody-antigen
`
`2. Physical and Chemical Properties
`of Amino Acids
`Since antibody binding sites are formed by six
`a highly
`supported on
`loops
`hypervariable
`conserved P-sheet framework, there is likely to be a
`bias towards amino acids that are generally found in
`non-helical regions of proteins. Figure 1 shows the
`normalized frequencies of occurrence of amino . acids
`in a-helix, /3-sheet and reverse turns in 66 globular
`proteins comprising 31 different conformations
`(Levitt, 1978). In these structures, the occurrence of
`Pro,G~,T~,~,Thr,Aw,~,A~,lli~dT~
`in a-helices is less frequent than random. Leu, His,
`Trp, Thr, Tyr, Phe, Ile and Val have a greater than
`random probability of occurring in /3-sheets; the
`same .is true for Thr, Tyr, Asn, Ser, Asp, Gly and
`Pro in reverse turns. Arg appears to be equally
`tolerated in all the secondary structures elements
`considered. In general structural terms, Tyr and
`Thr seem to be the most useful non-helix forming
`residues, since they could be positioned in either the
`strand or turn regions of the hypervariabli;i loops.
`The free energy of interaction between an anti(cid:173)
`body and its antigen is a function of both enthalpy
`and entropy. Non-bonded forces between the inter(cid:173)
`acting molecules include hydrophobic, hydrogen
`bond, van der Waals' and electrostatic interactions
`(for a review, see Fersht, 1985). In general terms,
`antibody combining Rite residues need to be as
`multifaceted as possible to accommodate the varied
`the
`features of
`stereochemical and electronic
`antigen. Hence, amino acids with non-polar (for
`example Leu, Ile and Val) and charged (for example
`Asp, Glu, Lys and Arg) side-chains would be of more
`limited usefulness than, for example, His, which is
`known to be capable of cross-linking sequentially
`distant but spatially close regions of proteins (Baker
`& Hubbard, 1984; l.S.M. & A.J.O ., unpublished
`results) . Similarly, the amides Asn and Gln would be
`generally more preferable than Asp and Gin, since
`the former pair are both hydrogen bond donors and
`acceptors whereas their- charged counterparts are
`only acceptors.
`If a positive charge is required in the antibody
`combining site, Arg would be more suitable than
`Lys because of its greater functional versatility; for
`example, Arg can form a larger number of hydrogen
`bonds than Lys. As a consequence of its planar
`nature and n-electron system, the terminal guanidi(cid:173)
`nium group of Arg often exhibits pseudo-aromatic
`behaviour by participating in most of the inter(cid:173)
`tru.e
`for
`catalogued
`previously
`actions
`aromatic-aromatic interactions (l.S.M. & A.J.O.,
`unpublished results). These interactions occur at the
`intersubunit interfaces of a number of oligomeric
`including viral coat proteins and a
`proteins,
`the photosynthetic reaction
`membrane protein;
`centre of Rhodopseudornonas viridis. The ability to
`form hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions and
`
`2 of 19
`
`BI Exhibit 1114
`
`

`

`Antibody Binding Sites
`
`135
`
`1-Sr---...-----.------.----~--~--~
`
`2·0 .---------..-----,-----...----~---~
`
`1·4
`
`0·6
`
`w
`
`G
`
`M
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`K
`
`c
`
`G
`
`N
`
`EK Q
`
`c
`
`T y
`
`A
`
`w
`
`M
`
`05.__ _ _ ...__ _ _ _._ _ _ - - ' - - - - ' - - - - - ' - - - - '
`1·0
`1·2
`0·6
`Prot>abiHty a-tle!ix
`
`O·O '------~---~----'----~----'
`1·0
`0·6
`1·2
`0·8
`Prababillty '3-slleet
`
`(a)
`
`(cl
`
`2·0
`
`G
`
`K Q
`
`E.
`
`c
`
`w
`
`A
`
`M
`
`O·O '-------'-----'-----'------'------'-~---'
`0·8
`0·6
`04
`1·2
`
`Probatiility a-helix
`
`(b)
`
`Figure 1. Scatter diagrams , showing the normalized
`frequencies of occurrence of amino acids in IX-helix,
`in 66 globular proteins
`turns
`P-sheet and reverse
`comprising 31 different conformations (Levitt, 1978).
`/3-sheet.
`ex-helix
`forming
`(a) Probability of
`versus
`(b) Probability of forming IX-helix versus reverse turn.
`(c) Probability of forming /3-sheet versus reverse turn. The
`values represent the ratio of the fraction of residues of
`each amino acid that occurred in the secondary structure
`element to this fraction for all residues. To eliminate a
`bias towards structures that were determined more than
`once, the values were each weighted by a factor of
`l/(number of related proteins with same conformation).
`Normalized frequencies of I indicate random occurrence,
`than
`whilst > I
`indicate more frequent occurrence
`random. The actual point is marked by the bottom left of
`the I letter amino acid code: A, Ala; R, Arg; N, Asn;
`D, Asp; C, Cys; Q, Gin; E, Glu; G, Gly; H, His; I, Ile;
`L, Leu; K, Lys; M, Met; F, Phe; S, Ser; T, Thr; W, Trp;
`Y, Tyr; and V, Val.
`
`attractive electrostatic interactions between posi(cid:173)
`tively charged groups and aromatic rings permits
`Tyr and Trp to interact with structurally diverse
`antigens. Another functional advantage in locating
`Tyr and Trp in antibody combining sites is that,
`unlike amino acids having shorter side-chains, such
`as Asn and Ser, they lack the capacity to interact
`easily with other groups on the antibody surface but
`are ideally suited to interact with another molecule.
`The accommodation of charged areas on the
`antigen need not necessitate an antibody combining
`site possessing amino acids of complementary
`charge. Analysis of Arg, Lys, Glu and Asp side(cid:173)
`chains buried at the intermolecular interfaces of
`oligomeric systems indicates that oriented dipoles
`are usually preferred over countercharges in stabi(cid:173)
`lizing these buried residues (I.S.M. & A.J.0., unpub(cid:173)
`lished results). Thus, the peptide backbone and
`polar side-chains of hypervariable loop residues
`could be deployed to stabilize both negatively and
`positively charged regions . In some instances, this
`
`may be as effective as employment of formally
`charged amino acids: in cases of charge-charge
`interaction, the steric effects of neighbouring regions
`may prevent the formation of geometrically optimal
`ion-pairs such that the potentially available energy
`is not fully realized.
`The non-covalent association between antibodv
`and antigen requires the removal of water fro~
`interacting molecules.
`the
`surfaces buried by
`Antibody regions involved in this process Rhoukl he
`capable of tolerating both the polar and non-polar
`environments that exist before complex formation
`and upon antigen binding, respectively. Individual
`residues exposed on the surface of the free antibody
`can become completely or partially buried in the
`complex. In addition to residue amphipathicity,
`residue size might be a factor. There is a good
`correlation between the surface area of amino acids
`and their free energies of transfer from water to an
`organic phase (Chothia, 1974, 1975; Gelles &
`Klapper , 1978). A value of 1 A2 (I A= O·l nm) of
`
`3 of 19
`
`BI Exhibit 1114
`
`

`

`136
`
`I. S. Mian et al.
`
`G
`
`c
`
`M
`
`· 10
`
`N
`
`a
`E H
`
`w
`
`R
`
`·20 '-----'------'-----~--__,R..._._ _ _,
`150
`200
`70
`250
`100
`Surface aree. (A2}
`
`Figure 2. Comparison of the size of amino acids and the
`affinities of their side-chains for water. The surface area
`(Rose et al. , 1985) comprises the mean solvent access(cid:173)
`ibility for amino acid X in an ensemble of Gly-X-Gly
`tripeptides. The hydration potential (Wolfenden et al. ,
`1981) is the effective free energy of transfer from the
`vapour phase to dilute aqueous solution buffer at pH 7 of
`molecules having the structure R-H, where R is the side(cid:173)
`chain of each amino acid; for P (Pro), only the surface
`area is
`indicated, since no hydration potential was
`evaluated. Side-chains were modelled by the following
`compounds: A, methane; R , methylguanidine; N, aceta(cid:173)
`mide; D, acetic acid; C, methanethiol; Q, propionamide;
`E, propionic acid; G, H 2 ; H , 4-methylimidazole; I , isobu(cid:173)
`tane; L, butane; K, n-butylamine; M, ethylmethyl
`sulphide; F,
`toluene; S, methanol; T, ethanol; W,
`3-methylindole; Y, p-cresol; and V, propau.,. As a result of
`technical difficulties (Wolfenden et al., 1981), methyl(cid:173)
`guanidine (shorter than the side-chain of Arg by 2 methy(cid:173)
`lene groups) was employed to estimate the value for
`propylguanidine; this probably leads to the hydrophilic
`and hydrophobic nature of Arg being over- and under(cid:173)
`estimated, respectively.
`
`surface area gives a hydrophobic energy of
`25 cal/mol (1 cal = 4· 184 J: Chothia, 1974). Whilst
`these van der Waals' energies may be small
`compared to a hydrogen bond, when summed over
`the entire combining site they may be important in
`stabilizing the complex. Figure 2 compares the
`affinities of amino acid side-chains for water
`(Wolfenden et al., 1981) with the surface area of the
`entire amino acid (Rose et al., 1985). The classical
`groupings into small, large, hydrophobic and hydro(cid:173)
`philic amino acids are evident. With respect to
`amphipathicity, Ser, Thr, Tyr and Trp seem desir(cid:173)
`able residues to locate in antibody binding sites,
`since their side-chains are in the midrange of hydro(cid:173)
`gen potential values. The aromatic residues Tyr and
`Trp are also two of the largest and are capable of
`contributing significantly to the total intemction
`energy (Fig. 2).
`
`Figure 3. A diagram illustrating specificity and cross(cid:173)
`reactivity for a given antibody. The specific binding of the
`antibodies A and B to antigens A and B is a function of
`the high degree of complementarity between
`their
`molecular surfaces in terms of shape, size and functiona(cid:173)
`lity. (a) Cross-reactivity may arise as a result of structural
`similarity of epitopes between antigens A and A'
`(Richards et al. , 1975). A poor fit in one region may be
`compensated for by a good fit elsewhere. This could result
`in a sufficient number of short-range interactions to
`produce a stable antibody-antigen complex. Another
`cross-reacting antigen, A", may
`fit
`the antibody
`combining site in a slightly different way. (b) The anti(cid:173)
`body B may accommodate the related antigens B and B'
`if it is able to vary the stereochemical features of the
`combining site, i.e. if it is intrinsically pliable.
`
`In an antibody- antigen complex, the stabiliza(cid:173)
`tion energy gained from the various intermolecular
`forces must more than offset losses due to conforma(cid:173)
`tional entropy and conformational strain. The free
`energy of complex formation could therefore be
`maximized by minimizing the loss of conformational
`entropy upon association. It is known that a single
`antibody is able to combine with a spectrum of
`different antigens (Richards et al., 1975). Although
`such cross-reaction may occur either because the
`antigens share epitopes, or because the epitopes are
`sufficiently similar in shape to bind the same anti (cid:173)
`body (Richards et al., 1975), it could arise also if the
`topography of the combining site could be modu(cid:173)
`lated (Fig. 3) . Thus, antibodies could utilize amino
`acids whose side-chains were sufficiently structur(cid:173)
`ally and functionally flexible to permit them to alter
`the stereochemical features of the combining site
`with minimal loss of entropy. The potential im por(cid:173)
`tance of side-chain mot ion has been further high·
`lighted by a recent comparative study of known
`antibody structures and sequences (Chothia et al,,
`1989). It has been suggested that the number of
`main-chain conformations of at least five of the six
`loops appears to be limited. The adoption of a
`specific backbone conformation is believed to be a
`reflection of only a few key conserved residues in the
`loop or framework of the antibody (Chothia et al .,
`1989). This small repertoire of canonic&! structures
`would represent a reduction in the ispeotrum of
`specificity and affinity potentially ;wail11ble to the
`antibody binding site were the number of confor!'l'Ht ·
`tions proportion11l to the number of f!equences th a.t
`coi1ld be produced genetically,
`
`4 of 19
`
`BI Exhibit 1114
`
`

`

`Antibody Binding Sites
`
`137
`
`Table 1
`Preferred conformations of amino acid side-chains as described by their torsion parameters (Cody, 1985)
`
`Residue
`
`A
`R
`
`N
`D
`c
`
`Q
`
`E
`
`G
`H
`
`L
`
`K
`M
`
`F
`
`p
`s
`T
`w
`y
`
`v
`
`x11
`
`60
`-60
`60
`-60
`-60
`60
`60
`-60
`180
`-60
`60
`
`-60
`60
`60
`180
`-60
`180
`-60
`60
`-60
`180
`-60
`60
`180
`-60
`60
`±35
`60
`-60
`60
`-60
`60
`-60
`180
`60
`-60
`
`5; -19
`-15
`
`11
`-7; ±35
`-30
`
`-20
`
`O; ±35
`
`O; 25
`-25
`
`-15; -45
`
`-18; ±36
`
`-20
`±20
`
`±20
`
`±10
`5
`-25
`
`-10
`
`±20
`
`-11; -35
`
`Torsion parameters (°)
`
`x12
`
`x2'
`
`x22
`
`-120
`-120
`
`180
`180
`180
`
`180
`180
`0
`±5
`
`180
`180
`180
`180
`180
`
`60
`60
`180
`180
`180
`-60
`-60
`60
`180
`180
`180
`180
`90
`90
`90
`±35
`
`90
`90
`90
`90
`90
`
`180
`-60
`180
`
`180
`-60
`
`180
`
`x4
`
`±10
`±10
`
`180
`
`x3
`
`180
`180
`
`-15
`25
`±15
`±15
`±15
`
`180
`-60
`180
`180
`
`±25
`
`±20
`
`±10
`
`These were derived from crystallographic studies of amino acids and their derivatives. All atoms are numbered using the Greek
`;:12 = (N-C11-C"-Ci'2 ),
`x. 21 = (Ca-CP-C1-cb 1 ),
`;J; = (0---C-Ca-~~), ;: 11 = (~~-Ca-CY1-CY 1 )i
`the C1
`letter designations starting with
`3 = (CP-C'-C6-C'), X4 = (C1-C6-C'-C'). To account for the ring pucker in Pro, x
`22 = (C"-CP-C1-C62 ), x
`4 = (C'-C6-N-C") and
`x
`xs = (C6-N-C"-CP). The most frequently observed values are given first.
`
`The number of degrees of freedom of each amino
`acid side-chain can be approximated by examining
`the range and distribution of the observed confor(cid:173)
`mations (Table 1). Residues with short side-chains
`such as Ser and Thr lose little entropy when fixed
`upon antigen association, since they have only one
`and two variable side-chain torsion angles, respect(cid:173)
`ively. However, they project only a short distance
`from the surface of the antibody and so could not
`effect substantial changes in binding site topo(cid:173)
`graphy. Large residues can elicit great changes in
`the surface contours of the combining site, since
`they can sweep out large volumes of space. Residues
`with the largest surface area (Fig. 2) are Trp, Arg,
`Tyr and Phe-and of these, Arg has twice the number
`of variable torsion angles of the other three.
`Additionally, Arg is less suitable than the other
`aromatic residues because it is charged and there-
`
`fore requires a more restrictive interaction at the
`interface.
`Tyr represents a balance between the many
`different, though sometimes conflicting, desirable
`aspects we believe to be of general importance in
`antibody-antigen interactions. Thus, it would be
`expected to be the most common residue in anti(cid:173)
`body combining sites. Experimental evidence from
`antibody sequences and structures appears to verify
`these assumptions.
`
`3. Combining Sites in Known
`Antibody-Antigen Complexes
`Table 2 lists the antibody residues that bind
`antigen in six complexes whose structures have been
`determined by X-ray
`crystallography. The
`numbering scheme used follows the convention of
`
`5 of 19
`
`BI Exhibit 1114
`
`

`

`138
`
`I. S. Mian et al.
`
`Table 2
`Antigen binding residues observed in six crystallographically determined antibody-antigen complexes
`
`Residue position
`
`McPC603 HyHEL-5 HyHEL-IO Fab Dl.3
`
`Fab 4-4-20
`
`BI3I2
`
`Percentage composition
`
`Antibody- antigen complex
`
`FR2
`CDR2
`
`CDR3
`
`A. Light chain
`CDRI
`27D
`28
`30t
`3It
`32t
`34
`49
`50t
`53
`9lt
`92t
`93t
`94t
`95t
`96t
`B. Heavy chain
`FRI
`30t
`CDRl
`'ll+
`~· 1
`32t
`33
`35
`47
`50
`51
`52
`52At
`53t
`54t
`55t
`56
`57
`58
`95
`96
`97
`98
`99
`100
`lOOA
`lOOB
`100!
`
`FR2
`CDR2
`
`CDR3
`
`G (30)
`N (3I)
`N (32)
`
`y (50)
`Q (53)
`8 (91)
`N (92)
`
`y (96)
`
`T (30)
`Q {Ql \
`l.J \U..l./
`D (32 )
`y (33)
`
`y (50)
`s (52)
`
`y (53)
`s (54)
`s (56)
`
`y (58)
`W(98)
`
`N (30)
`y (31)
`y (33)
`
`D (49)
`
`W(90)
`G (9I)
`R (92)
`
`p (94t)
`
`w (33)
`E (35)
`w (47)
`E (50)
`
`s (55)
`s (57)
`T (58)
`N (59)
`G (99)
`
`y (101)
`
`H
`
`y
`
`y
`y
`
`F
`w
`8
`
`T
`G
`y
`
`w
`
`G
`D
`
`R
`D
`y
`R
`
`D (97)
`
`y (100)
`
`L (102)
`
`y (33)
`E (35)
`
`R (52)
`
`N (101)
`
`w (107)
`
`H
`
`y
`R
`
`8
`
`w
`
`w
`
`y
`y
`
`D
`D
`
`y
`
`G
`
`v
`
`p
`
`R
`
`A
`
`I
`s
`s
`G
`s
`y
`
`F
`y
`
`p
`F
`
`824, H20, Yl6, Gl4
`Dl7, N16, 8I6, Y9
`S25, N23, VI4, LIO
`S33, N28, TIS, H5
`Y68, N6, S4, W3
`A30, N24, H20, S9
`Y83, G9, F 3, 82
`Gl9, Dl5, Kll , RIO
`S38 , Kl 8, TI4, 8 ll
`W27, Y22, 816, Gl2
`N20, Yl8, 8I5, Dl2
`S36, EI4, HlO, Y9
`Sl 7, Nl6, Vl2, Ll2
`P63, HlO, LS, S6
`Wl9, Yl8, LIS, RIO
`
`S48, T42, K5, G 1
`S39, D34, :N7 , R6
`Y60, Fl 7, S6, T6
`Y40, G24, Wl6, A5
`H26, N21, Sl7, El5
`W94, Y3, L<l, F<l
`Yl9, El2, Al2, Rl2
`184, 89, Fl, Rl, Vl
`N27, Rl6, Sl3, Dl2
`P54, Nl9, S9, L4
`N29, G21, Sll, AlO
`S27, N26, G23, Dl6
`G56, Yl9, Sl5, D3
`825, T24, Gl6, Y lO
`T74, 112, K3, 82
`N20, Y l 9, L ll 5, El 3
`D28, Gl8, SlO, YlO
`Y26, Gl2, R9, D6
`Y32, Gl4, D6, L6
`Y32, Gl9, V7, S6
`G26, Y21, Sl6, E5
`S26, Yl2, Fl2, R7
`S23, Fl2, GlO, Y8
`Y29, Fl2, Dll, Sll
`W35, Y34, AlO, M6
`
`McPC603 (Satow et al., 1986), HyHEL-5 (Sheriff et al., 1987), HyHEL-10 (Padlan et al., 1989), Fab Dl.3 (Amit et al., 1986), Fab 4-4-
`20 (Herron et al., 1989) and Bl3I2 (Stanfield et al., 1990). Residue positions, framework (FR) and complementarity determining regions
`(CDR) are from Kaba.t et al. (1987). The sequential residue numbers of structures in the Protein Data Bank (Bernstein et al., 1977):
`McPC603 (File 2MCP), HyHEL-5 (lHFL) and HyHEL-10 (3HFM), are indicated in parentheses. At each of the positions known to bind
`antigen, the column headed Percentage composition indicates the 4 most common amino acids and their frequencies as calculated from
`the summary tables in Kabat et al. (1987). For example, one of the fluorescein binding residues in Fab 4-4-20 is His L27D (located in
`CDRl). Examination of the sequence database at this location indicates that Ser, His, Tyr and Gly are found in 74% of all sequences
`(24%, 20%, 16% and 14%, respectively) with the remaining 26% comprising the other 16 amino acids (each is < 14% of the total).
`Asn, Asp, Gin and Glu are underestimated because positions given as Asx or Glx by Kabat et al. (1987) (i.e. where there are uncertainties
`in sequence data), whilst being included in the total number of sequences, are not incorporated into totals for these 4 amino acids.
`Although positions L95 and L96 are listed separately, examination of t he crystal structures of McPC603, H yHEL-5 and HyHEL-10
`indicates that Leu L96 (102), Pro L95 (94) and Tyr L96 (96) are structurally equivalent (see also Fig. 5). In HyHEL-10, Ser L93 (93)
`a nd Trp L94 (94) are listed as being partially buried by t he antigen lysozy me (Padlan et al., 1989). In B l 3I2, Leu L27D, Cys H32, Trp
`H47, Gly H50, Ser H96, Ser H97 and Asp H98 are buried by, but not in van der Waals' contact with, the antigen (Stanfield et al., 1990).
`Also marked are residues in the hypervariable and framework regions that a comparative study of known antibody structures and
`sequences (Chothia et al., 1989) has suggested as being important (t} and mainly responsible (t} for generating the observed main-chain
`conformations of 5 of the 6 hypervariable loops (predictions for CDR3 of the heavy chain were not made). Amongst all the antigen
`binding residues in these complexes, only Pro L95 (94) of HyHEL-5 belongs to the group of key residues. Other positions that are
`mainlv responsible for producing the canonical structures occur at the followimr nositions. Lie-ht chain: 2 1114. i.e. out of a total of 4
`classe~ in ~hich this is i~portant for the observed conformation , only in canonic;;:-! ; tructure nu~ber 1 is this, ~ r~sidue that is a primary
`determinant of the loop main chain conformation), 25 (1/4), 29 (1/4), 33 (1/4), 48 (1/1), 64 (1/1), 71 (1/4), 90 ([1, 2, 3]/3), 95 ([l, 3]/3).
`Heavy chain: 26 (1/2), 27 (1/2), 29 (1/2), 34 (1/2), 52a (2/4), 55 ([l, 4]/4), 71 ([2, 3, 4]/4).
`
`6 of 19
`
`BI Exhibit 1114
`
`

`

`Antibody Binding Sites
`
`139
`
`Kabat et al. (1987) with L (light) and H (heavy)
`prefixing
`the position number
`(the sequential
`residue numbers are given in parentheses where
`available). The complexes are McPC603 (Satow et
`al., 1986: murine myeloma
`lgA-K), HyHEL-5
`(Sheriff et al., 1987: BALB/c murine monoclonal
`antibody, IgGl-K), HyHEL-10 (Padlan et al., 1989:
`BALB/c murine monoclonal antibody, IgGl-K),
`Fab Dl.3 (Amit et al., 1986: BALB/c murine mono(cid:173)
`clonal antibody, IgGl-K), Fab 4-4-20 (Herron et al.,
`1989: BALB/c murine monoclonal antibody,
`IgG2a-K) and Fab Bl312 (Stanfield et al., 1990:
`murine monoclonal antibody, IgGl-K). McP0603
`and Fab 4-4-20 bind small haptens (phosphocholine
`and fluorescein, respectively), Bl312 binds a syn(cid:173)
`thetic 19 amino acid residue peptide (a homologue
`of the 0-helix of myohaemerythrin) and
`the
`remainder bind different regions of the same large
`protein antigen (lysozyme). Because of the limited
`number of X-ray structures of antibody-antigen
`complexes, Table 2
`includes
`the frequency of
`different amino acids obtained from the more exten(cid:173)
`sive antibody sequence database (Kabat et al.,
`1987). These potential binding positions are
`obtained by projecting the information from the
`structurally determined interface residues to those
`same locations in the larger sequence database. For
`example, position L91 binds antigen in all the struc(cid:173)
`turally determined complexes considered and at this
`location in other antibody sequences, the four most
`common amino acids are Trp, Tyr, Ser and (Hy.
`In spite of differences in the stereochemical
`features of the antigen (the anti-lysozyme anti(cid:173)
`bodies bind to different regions of the protein), there
`appears to be an overall bias in the types of amino
`acid found in the combining sites. At both the
`known and potential binding positions, Tyr, Trp ,
`Ser and Asn are the most common residues that
`interact with antigen. As outlined in the previous
`section,
`these four, particularly Tyr and Trp,
`possess structural and functional characteristics
`that are highly desirable for antibody binding sites.
`Details of the combining region of HyHEL-5 and
`McP0603
`(Fig. 4) demonstrate
`the extensive
`binding repertoire and versatility of Tyr and Trp in
`accommodating both small and large ligands. In the
`remaining
`complexes
`(HyHEL-10, Fab Dl.3,
`Fab 4-4-20 and Fab Bl312), these residues also
`employ both the aromatic ring system and hydro(cid:173)
`gen-bonding atoms in interacting with the hapten or
`antigen (Padlan et al., 1989; Amit et al., 1986;
`Herron et al., 1989; Stanfield et al., 19!l0).
`Table 2 indicates that the concentration of Tyr is
`highest in the heavy chain. This may account for
`the possession of antigen-binding affinities by
`complete variable heavy domains (Ward et al.,
`1989). CDR3 of the heavy chain contains 19 amino
`acid positions, including a frequently inserted eight
`residue loop (Kabat et al., 1987). Tyr comprises
`25 % of the total residues; in 11 of the positions it is
`the most common residue and many individual
`sequences
`contain
`consecutive Tyr
`residues,
`including five in two sequences (human heavy chain
`
`CDR3 of proteins OU and WOL; Kabat et al., 1987).
`Chothia et al. (1989) were unable to make predic(cid:173)
`tions about the conformation of this loop. Another
`observation from the sequence data (Kabat et al.,
`1987) is that Tyr and Trp frequently alternate with
`small amino acids such as Gly, Ala and Ser. This
`pattern of residues might allow maximum mobility
`of Tyr and Trp. In HyHEL-5, the internally
`directed residue, Met L33(32), is located between
`Tyr L32(31) and Tyr L34(33) and permits the side-·
`chains of the flanking aromatics to be exposed and
`potentially mobile. This Met is one of the residues
`responsible for stabilizing canonical structure 1 of
`the light chain CDR.l (Chothia et al., 1989).
`The number of locations involved directly or in(cid:173)
`directly in antigen binding that are additional to
`those observed in the structures examined should be
`relatively
`small. Nuclear magnetic
`resonance
`spectroscopy studies of three different antibodies
`raised against the same 14 amino acid residue
`peptide antigen (Anglister & Zilber, 1990) indicate
`that the aromatic residues that interact with
`antigen are all situated at positions given in Table 2
`(His L31, Tyr L32, Phe L96, Tyr H32, Trp H50,
`Trp HlOOA). The same is true for all but one posi(cid:173)
`tion (Lys HlOOc) believed to be potentially involved
`in hapten binding in the preliminary crystal struc(cid:173)
`ture of Fab 36-71, an anti-arsonate monoclonal
`antibody (Rose et al., 1990). The other presumed
`binding positions are Phe L32 , Phe L50, Phe L96,
`Asn H35, Trp H47 , Tyr H50 and Glu H96 . Figure 5
`shows all residues observed to bind antigen in
`McPC603, HyHEL-5 and HyHEL-10, and two
`potential supplemental positions, H59 and H94.
`H59 is implicated by studies on anti-morphine
`(Miller & Glasel, 1989) and anti-common acute
`lymphocytic leukaemia antigen (Kudo et al., 1985)
`antibodies. In addition, this is the only position that
`is highly conserved amongst all six CDRs; Kabat et
`al. (1987)
`indicated that 96% of all antibody
`sequences have Tyr at H59. The importance of H94
`is supported by the observation that changes in
`affinity of variant anti-digoxin antibodies could be
`accounted for by a mutation at this position (Panka
`et al., 1988).
`As the number of crystallographically determined
`complexes with greater diversity in the nature of
`antigen increases, the types of amino acid

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket