throbber
Crystal Structures of Neuraminidase-Antihody
`Complexes
`
`W.R. TULIP,* J.N. VARGHESE,* R.G. WEBSTER,** G.M. AIR,t W.G. LAVER,* AND P.M. COLMAN*
`*C.S.l.R.O. Division of Biotechnology, Parkville 3052, Australia; **St. Jude Children's Research Hospital,
`Memphis, Tennessee 38101; tDepartment of Microbiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama 35294;
`Wohn Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia
`
`The nature of antigen-antibody interactions has be(cid:173)
`come clearer in the last few years as crystal structures of
`antigen-antibody complexes have been elucidated.
`Such structures have permitted a visualization of the
`interface between antigen and antibody. Three-dimen(cid:173)
`sional structures of five complexes have now been re(cid:173)
`ported, two containing the influenza virus neuraminid(cid:173)
`ase as antigen and the Fabs NC41 and NClO (Colman
`et al. 1987, 1989), and three with hen egg-white
`lysozyme and the Fabs Dl.3, HyHEL-5, and HyHEL-
`10 (Amit et al. 1986; Sheriff et al. 1987b; E.A. Padlan
`et al., in prep.). The major parameters that define the
`scope of the antigen-antibody interface are emerging as
`more structures are solved and refined to greater preci(cid:173)
`topic
`this
`sion. Several reviews have dealt with
`(Mariuzza et al. 1987; Colman 1988; Davies et al.
`1988).
`Influenza is an orthomyxovirus and possesses an
`outer lipid membrane. Embedded in this membrane
`are two protein antigens, a hemagglutinin and a
`neuraminidase, the latter being a tetrameric glycopro(cid:173)
`tein comprising a head and an amino-terminal stalk that
`provides the attachment to the virus. Heads with full
`enzymatic and antigenic properties may be removed
`from the stalk with pronase and thus made soluble.
`Such heads have been used in all crystallographic inves(cid:173)
`tigations of the enzyme. The structure of neuraminid(cid:173)
`ase of N2 subtype is known (Varghese et al. 1983) and
`has a structure similar to that of subtype N9 (Baker et
`al. 1987). N9 neuraminidase is the antigen in both of
`the complexes discussed here.
`In this paper, we describe the crystal structure of the
`neuraminidase-NC41 Fab complex as refined at 2.9 A
`resolution and give a structural basis for the observed
`lack of binding of NC41 antibody with escape mutants
`of N9 neuraminidase. The main features of this com(cid:173)
`plex and the neuraminidase-NClO Fab complex are
`also compared with those of the lysozyme complexes.
`
`METHODS
`
`The isolation (Laver et al. 1984) and sequencing (Air
`et al. 1985) of N9 neuraminidase, production of mono(cid:173)
`clonal antibodies, and properties of the neuraminidase(cid:173)
`antibody complexes (Tulloch et al. 1986; Webster et al.
`1987) have all been reported previously. Sequences of
`antibodies were obtained from RNA (G.M. Air, un-
`
`Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biowgy, Volume LIV © 1989 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 0-87969-057 • 7 /89 $1.00
`
`pub!.). The crystallization and structure determination
`were described for complexes containing two of these
`antibodies, namely, NC41 (Colman et al. 1987; Laver
`et al. 1987) and NClO (Air et al. 1987; Colman et al.
`1989). Diffraction data sets extending to resolutions of
`2.9 A and 3.0 A, respectively, were collected on film
`from a rotating anode source, and a 2.5 A synchrotron
`data set was obtained for the NC41 complex. Refine(cid:173)
`ment of these two crystal structures proceeded initially
`by the stereochemically restrained least-squares pro(cid:173)
`gram PROLSQ (Hendrickson and Konnert 1981). In
`later stages, the molecular dynamics program X-PLOR
`(Brunger 1988) was used . The NC41 structure will be
`further refined against the 2.5 A resolution data, and
`full details of the refinements will be presented
`elsewhere. Between successive rounds of refinement,
`the atomic models were rebuilt on an Evans and
`Sutherland PS300, using FRODO (Jones 1985) and
`- Fe electron density map (where F0 is
`displaying a 2F0
`the observed structure factor and Fe is the calculated
`structure factor). The mean positional error of the
`models was estimated by a statistical method (Luzzati
`1952). In the description of the structure, maximum
`distances for van der Waals contacts, hydrogen bonds,
`and salt links were as defined in Table 1 (see also
`Sheriff et al. 1987a). The molecular surface program
`MS (Connolly 1983) was used to calculate buried sur(cid:173)
`face area with a probe radius of 1.7 A. MS calculates
`the molecular surface area, rather than the solvent(cid:173)
`accessible surface area (Lee and Richards 1971; Con(cid:173)
`nolly 1983). Kabat numbering was used for the anti(cid:173)
`bodies (Kabat et al. 1987). Amino acid residue num(cid:173)
`bers are prefixed by L (light chain) and H (heavy
`chain). Complementarity-determining regions (CDRs)
`were defined as in Kabat et al. (1987), and their se(cid:173)
`quence numbers are light chain 24-34, 50-56, and
`89-97 and heavy chain 31-35, 50-65 , and 95-102.
`
`RESULTS
`
`NC41 Complex
`The R-factor (E i1F0I - IFJ IE IF0 1) for 20,065 reflec(cid:173)
`tions from 6.0 to 2.9 A resolution is 0.187 for the
`current model. Virtually all of the main-chain is ob(cid:173)
`served in continuous electron density, as are most of
`the side-chains, but the orientations of only about half
`25 7
`
`1 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1101
`
`

`

`~
`C1I
`00
`
`Table 1. Contact Residues in the Interface between Neuraminidase and NC41 Fab
`NC41 Fab
`
`light chain
`
`heavy chain
`
`S52 T53 H55
`
`156
`
`Y92
`
`S93
`
`P94 W96
`
`N31 Y32
`
`N52 N53
`
`E96 097 N98
`
`F99
`
`SlOOA
`
`LIOOB
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x.
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`x
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`x
`x
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`N9
`neuraminidase Y 49 W50
`x
`
`P326
`R327
`P328
`N329
`
`x
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`G343
`N344
`N345
`N347
`
`1366
`S367
`1368
`A369
`S370
`S372
`
`L399
`N400
`T401
`0402
`W403
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`P431
`x
`K432
`x
`0434
`x
`Residues are grouped in segments of polypeptide chain. Crosses indicate residue pairs that have at least one pair of atoms within van der Waals contact distance.
`Maximum contact distances (Sheriff et al. 1987a) are as follows, where C =carbon, N =nitrogen, 0 =oxygen: (CC) 4.107 A; (NN) 3.441 A; (00) 3.33 A; (CN) 3.774 A;
`(CO) 3.719 A; (NO) 3.386A. Residues partially buried from solvent by the interaction, but not in direct contact, are Thr-L31, Arg-L54, His-L91, Pro-L95. Thr-H28. Thr(cid:173)
`H30, Gly-H33, Trp-H50, Thr-H52A, Thr-H54, Glu-H56, and Asp-HlOl on the Fab, and lle-149, Asp-330, Asn-346, Thr-396, Arg-430, Glu-433, Asp-457, Pro-459,
`Lys-463, and lle-464 on the neuraminidase. In addition, two manoose residues. designated 2000 and 200F, which are in the carbohydrate attached to Asn-200 of a
`neighboring neuraminidase subunit, are partially buried.
`
`x
`
`x
`
`2 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1101
`
`

`

`CRYSTAL STRUCTURES OF NA-ANTIBODY COMPLEXES
`259
`of the peptide carbonyl oxygen atoms are unambigu(cid:173)
`Interactions between antigen and antibody include 1
`ously determined in electron density at this resolution.
`salt link from Lys-432 to Asp-H97, 10 hydrogen bonds,
`Six water molecules were included in the model with
`and 115 additional van der Waals contacts, although
`full occupancy. The root mean square difference be(cid:173)
`these latter numbers may change slightly after the high(cid:173)
`tween ideal and observed values is 0.022 A for bonds
`angle refinement. The buried surface area was calcu(cid:173)
`and 4.5° for angles, whereas the mean positional error
`lated to be about 878 A 2 on the surface of neuramini(cid:173)
`of the atoms was estimated to be 0.3 A.
`dase and 885 A 2 on the Fab. The nonpolar (carbon and
`Atoms at the interface between neuraminidase and
`sulfur) components of the total buried surface area of
`antibody are all in convincing electron density, with the
`neuraminidase and the NC41 variable module are 61 %
`exception of side-chains in the neuraminidase segment
`and 53%, respectively. These numbers are not signifi(cid:173)
`431-435. There appear to be no water molecules buried
`cantly different from those of the exposed surfaces of
`from solvent in the interface, but at least one water
`the two proteins (58% and 59% ), which implies that
`molecule is in contact with both antigen and antibody.
`the epitope and paratope are not particularly hydro(cid:173)
`The outline of the buried surface resembles a three-leaf
`phobic or hydrophilic.
`clover in shape, as shown in Figure 1, with the active
`The epitope on neuraminidase is extensive (see Fig.
`site in between two of the "leaves." A remarkable
`1; Table 1). It involves 5 segments on the upper surface
`shape complementarity exists over most of the inter(cid:173)
`of the enzyme, which contribute 22 residues in direct
`face, with protuberances on one protein matched by
`contact and 5 that are partially buried. In addition,
`depressions on the other. There is a large groove be(cid:173)
`there are partially buried atoms in 5 residues from 2
`tween the variable domains of the light and heavy
`other segments and in 2 sugar residues from the carbo(cid:173)
`chains (VL and VH) that accommodates a large ridge
`hydrate of a neighboring subunit.
`traversing the epitope made up of residues Asp-434,
`The binding site of the Fab is composed of 20 contact
`Lys-432, Ser-370, Ala-369, lle-368, and Asn-329. Dis(cid:173)
`residues and 12 partially buried residues (see Fig. l ;
`tances of 27 A, 30 A, and 27 A separate the tips of the
`Table 1). As CDR L1 is at least 5 A from neuramini(cid:173)
`three parts of the interface.
`dase, only 5 of the 6 CDRs are in direct contact; as a
`
`Figure 1. Stereoviews of the NC41 complex. (Top) N9 neuraminidase; (bottom) the NC41 VLVH dimer (light chain uppermost).
`The two proteins are shown opened out from a view, with the neuraminidase at left and the Fab at right, so that the interfaces are
`viewed en face. A Ca trace is drawn in thin Jines for noninteracting residues. Contact and partially buried residues are shown in
`toto by bold lines. (For pairs of residues in contact, see Table 1.)
`
`3 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1101
`
`

`

`260
`
`TULIP ET AL.
`
`result, the heavy chain has more interaction than the
`light chain. The comparative data for heavy and light
`chains, respectively, are 506 A 2 and 383 A 2 for the
`buried surface area; 6 and 5 for the number of ion pairs
`and hydrogen bonds; and 72 and 43 for the number of
`other contacts. Among the hypervariable loops, CDR
`H3 has the most buried surface area (267 A 2
`), repre(cid:173)
`senting 30% of the total, and it also has the greatest
`number of contacts (60). There are three framework
`region (FR) residues in the paratope, namely, Tyr-L49,
`Thr-H28, and Thr-H30, all of which are in segments
`adjacent to CDRs.
`
`Possible Conformational Changes in Antigen
`and Antibody
`Colman et al. ( 1987) reported that the structure of
`both the antigen and NC41 antibody may have changed
`as a result of antibody binding (for review, see Colman
`1988). The refinement of the NC41 complex is essen(cid:173)
`tially complete, whereas the refinement of uncomplex(cid:173)
`ed N9 neuraminidase (Baker et al. 1987) at 2.2 A
`resolution has not yet converged. A detailed com(cid:173)
`parison of the free and liganded neuraminidase struc(cid:173)
`tures will be possible in the near future. On the other
`hand, the structure of the free Fab has not been de(cid:173)
`termined; hence, there can be no direct comparison
`with the uncomplexed antibody. Comparisons with
`other Fab structures may suggest possibilities.
`At the level of local change, it appears that the
`main-chain conformations of five CDRs follow the
`canonical structures as predicted ( Chothia and Lesk
`1987; C. Chothia et al., in prep.). Hence, the local fold
`of each of these five loops is unlikely to have changed
`substantially upon the formation of a complex. How(cid:173)
`ever, CDRs can be flexible, for example, CDR L1 in
`Fab McPC603 (Satow et al. 1986) and CDR H3 in Fab
`19.9 (Lascombe et al. 1989). As the Fab engages an(cid:173)
`tigen, structural rearrangements might take place in
`both proteins. Such changes could be similar to those
`seen in the regions of crystal contacts (Wlodawer et al.
`1987) or in enzyme-inhibitor interactions (Greenblatt
`et al. 1989).
`On the basis of observed variability in VLVH interac(cid:173)
`tions in antibodies (Davies and Metzger 1983), it has
`been suggested that antigen might cause small rear(cid:173)
`rangements in the VLHH interface (Colman et al.
`1987). Whether or not this has happened in the NC41
`complex remains unclear. The analysis of that complex
`showed that its VLVH pairing was an outlier among
`other uncomplexed Fab structures. The angular differ(cid:173)
`ences in the VLVH pairing (see Table 1 in Colman et al.
`1987) of NC41 relative to New, McPC603, Kol, and
`J539 are currently 7.4°, 7.7°, 10.3°, and 11.5°. Given
`that such differences of up to 12.8° have since been
`found between uncomplexed Fabs (Lascombe et al.
`1989), NC41 can no longer be considered as an outlier.
`Direct evidence for this putative quaternary change can
`only come from comparison of complexed and uncom-
`
`plexed antibodies. A reported rotation of the side(cid:173)
`chain of Trp-H47 (Colman et al. 1987) has not been
`substantiated by the structure refinement. That tryp(cid:173)
`tophan now appears to have a canonical structure.
`
`Escape Mutants of N9 Neuraminidase
`Monoclonal antibodies directed against neuramini(cid:173)
`dase have selected a number of escape mutants of N9
`(see Tables 2 and 3 in Webster et al. 1987). Nine
`different mutants have been so selected, eight of them
`possessing single-site sequence changes in the contact
`surface with NC41. Figure 2 shows the positions of the
`nine mutants on a schematic diagram of neuraminidase.
`Several of these mutants crystallize isomorphously with
`wild-type N9, and their structures are being analyzed.
`Two, in particular, Oxl (370 Ser-Leu) and Ox2 (329
`Asn-Asp), have now been studied by difference
`Fourier methods, and preliminary results indicate local
`changes only for the Oxl substitution, and no structural
`change associated with the Ox2 substitution.
`The possible effect of the nine substitutions on the
`binding of NC41 antibody can be considered now that
`the structure of the interface is known in detail. The
`inhibition of neuraminidase activity by NC41 antibody
`was measured for these nine substitutions (see Fig. 2 in
`Colman et al. 1987). Wild-type neuraminidase is inhib(cid:173)
`ited, but there is no loss of activity for most of the
`mutants, indicating that the mutation has lowered the
`binding affinity of NC41. A decrease in activity, as a
`result of antibody binding, could be explained by two
`mechanisms. First, the access of substrate to and/or
`release of product from the enzyme's active site may be
`sterically hindered. Second, the active site could be
`
`Figure 2. Schematic diagram of one of the four subunits of
`neuraminidase viewed down the molecular fourfold rotation
`axis (bottom right). Arrows represent /3-sheet strands. Sites of
`mutation in N9 neuraminidase are numbered. All of the muta(cid:173)
`tions except 220 occur at residues that lie in the epitope
`recognized by NC41 Fab and reduce its binding affinity.
`
`4 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1101
`
`

`

`261
`A) and two ordinary contacts ( < 3.9 A) would be lost,
`including the only ion pair in the interface. The charge
`on Asp-H97 would then be unbalanced, even if a water
`molecule were bound in the hole.
`The only mutant that potentially preserves the shape
`complementarity but changes the chemical complemen(cid:173)
`tarity of the epitope is 329 Asn-+ Asp, designated Ox2.
`Its neuraminidase activity is decreased, indicating that
`NC41 does bind to Ox2 but not as strongly as to wild
`type. The complex between Ox2 and NC41 Fab crys(cid:173)
`tallizes isomorphously to wild type, and a data set has
`been collected from the crystals, but the model has not
`as yet been refined against it. A difference map of the
`wild-type complex with the Ox2 complex confirms CJUr
`earlier conclusion (Colman et al. 1987) that the binding
`of the antibody to these two antigenically distinct
`neuraminidases is isoteric. An X-ray refinement of the
`mutant complex is needed to confirm and clarify any
`small structural rearrangements that may be a con(cid:173)
`sequence of accommodating the aspartate at 329 in the
`interface.
`
`CRYSTAL STRUCTURES OF NA-ANTIBODY COMPLEXES
`deformed statically or dynamically. Recent studies
`(J.N. Varghese, unpubl.) have shown the orientation of
`sialic acid in the active site, which implies that the
`approach of substrate into the site requires the aglycon
`part of the substrate to be in the vicinity of the epitope
`recognized by NC41.
`Six of the nine substitutions replace smaller side
`chains by larger ones, namely, 367 Ser-+ Asn, 368
`Ile-+ Arg, 369 Ala-+ Asp, 370 Ser-+ Leu, 372
`Ser-+ Tyr, and 400 Asn-+ Lys. All of these substitu(cid:173)
`tions would be expected to diminish the shape com(cid:173)
`plementarity of the antigen-antibody interface leading
`to low binding affinity, and the results indicate that this
`is true for all but the 368 substitution, designated
`NC24Vl. Ile-368 is spatially near the middle of the
`epitope, and yet the mutation has little effect on the
`binding of NC41. An inspection shows that it is sitting
`at the base of a solvent-accessible pocket, which has
`both Fab and neuraminidase residues on its sides, and
`that an arginine side-chain could be accommodated if it
`followed the CG2 path of the isoleucine. This would
`first entail the loss of contacts made by CGl and CDl
`of the isoleucine and the creation of a hole where those
`two atoms were, and then the possible disturbance of
`other interacting residues by the arginine side-chain,
`such as Asn-329 and mannose-200F. Tentative support
`for such a placement of the arginine side-chain is given
`by a difference Fourier with (F0 b,NC24Vl - F 0 b,Nati)
`as coefficients, but the data are sparse and only extend
`to 3.8 A resolution.
`One mutant, 432 Lys-+ Asn, involves a decrease in
`the size of the side-chain, and although this would not
`produce a clash as above, the inhibition result indicates
`that the affinity of NC41 for that mutant is very low.
`This is not surprising because two good contacts ( < 3.0
`
`NCIO Complex
`At this stage, the refinement has not progressed
`significantly since the structure was reported (Colman
`et al. 1989). The R-factor for 12,674 reflections in the
`resolution range 6.0-3.0 A is 0.20, but segments of
`chain still remain out of density. In particular, the
`details of the interface, including buried surface area
`and numbers of contacts, are not clear. Nevertheless, it
`is apparent that the epitopes recognized by NClO and
`NC41 are largely overlapping (Colman et al. 1989). In
`addition, the mode of attachment of the two antibodies
`is completely different. As shown in Figure 3, the
`
`Figure 3. (Left) The tern N9 neuraminidase-NC41 Fab complex; (right) the whale N9 neuraminidase-NClO Fab complex. On
`both diagrams, the neuraminidase (lower left) and the VLVH dimer (upper right) are shown, with the neuraminidases in the same
`orientation. Ca traces of neuraminidase and heavy chains are indicated by thin lines, and light chains, by bold lines.
`
`5 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1101
`
`

`

`262
`
`TULIP ET AL.
`
`relative positions of VL and VH place equivalent CDRs
`a long distance from each other with respect to the
`antigen, and only four of the six CDRs on NClO are in
`contact with the antigen, namely, CDRs Ll, L3, H2,
`and H3. The similarity of the shape and charge distribu(cid:173)
`tion of the surfaces of the NClO and NC41 combining
`sites remains to be seen.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`It appears that the neuraminidase-NC41 Fab inter(cid:173)
`face is somewhat more extensive than the interfaces
`between lysozyme and the Fabs Dl.3, HyHEL-5, and
`HyHEL-10. The surface area buried by complex forma(cid:173)
`tion is larger, and with the exception of HyHEL-10,
`there are more van der Waals contacts. However, the
`number of hydrogen bonds and salt bridges is about the
`same. The extent of the interacting surface is also
`reflected in the numbers of contacting and partially
`buried residues (see Table 2) . This result is achieved
`through contact with only five antibody CDRs because
`more of CDR L2 and CDR H3 are used in this case
`than in the lysozyme examples.
`There are two significant differences between the
`interfaces of the neuraminidase and lysozyme complex(cid:173)
`es. First, the NC41 and NClO complexes demonstrate
`that an antibody does not require the use of all six
`CDRs in the interaction to achieve the number of
`contacts and buried surface area needed to bind effec(cid:173)
`tively. In the NC41 complex, the only noncontacting
`CDR, Ll, is "hanging over" the active site . In this
`position, it could possibly interfere with the access of
`substrate to the enzyme. Second, the outline of the
`interface of the NC41 complex has a peculiar trefoil
`shape, which is partly due to the presence of the active(cid:173)
`site pocket and the fact that CDR L1 is not in contact.
`In contrast, the interfaces of the lysozyme complexes,
`
`which all have six CDRs in contact, have simpler out(cid:173)
`lines.
`An important similarity between the neuraminidase
`and lysozyme complexes is the presence of FR residues
`in the paratope. Berek and Milstein (1987) reported
`that somatic hypermutation occurred at framework
`sites in the maturation of the immune response against
`a hapten. There is a priori no reason to exclude FR
`residues from the antigen-binding site of an antibody.
`Their capacity to participate in such binding remains a
`property of the adjacent CDR surface.
`The epitopes in the two neuraminidase complexes
`are composed of more segments than the epitopes in
`the three lysozyme complexes, which is in contrast with
`the number of antibody CDRs in contact (Table 2).
`The highly discontinuous nature of the neuraminidase
`epitope is largely determined by the tertiary structure
`of the enzyme (Varghese et al. 1983; Baker et al. 1987),
`which has many short loops on its upper surface con(cid:173)
`necting the /3-sheet strands. The lengths of the
`neuraminidase segments in contact are correspondingly
`shorter than in the lysozyme complexes.
`Chothia et al. ( 1986) reported that in the lysozyme-
`01.3 complex, the observed main-chain conformations
`of four of the CDRs were close to their predictions.
`Similarly, predictions were made for the NC41 CDRs.
`Five hypervariable loops follow the canonical struc(cid:173)
`tures and are close to the predicted conformations (C.
`Chothia et al., in prep.). However, there are errors
`between 0.4 A and 3.0 A in the predicted spatial ar(cid:173)
`rangement of the CDRs with respect to each other.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`
`We thank Peter Tulloch for helpful discussions on the
`manuscript, Paul Davis for assistance with computing,
`and Bert van Donkelaar for technical support. Steven
`
`Table 2. Number of Contacts and Buried Surface Areas in Antigen-antibody Complexes
`
`Antigen
`
`segments
`
`NC41'
`NCIO'
`
`5
`5+1CHO
`
`residuesb
`CD Rs
`Neuraminidase
`22 /34
`5
`4
`?
`
`20/32
`?
`
`878/885
`?
`
`Antibody
`residuesb
`
`Buried surface
`area (A 2
`) '
`antigen I antibody
`
`Lysozymed
`6
`17/22
`16/27
`2
`690/680
`Dl.3
`14/24
`3
`HyHEL-5
`6
`17/28
`7501745
`4
`15/27
`HyHEL-10
`6
`19/30
`7741721
`' In conjunction with S. Sheriff, who provided invaluable help, the buried surface areas were calculated
`with the same parameters so that the numbers of buried residues and surface areas are directly
`comparable.
`bX / Y denotes that X residues are in direct contact and Y residues are fully or partially buried.
`Maximum contact distances are defined in Table I (also see Sheriff et al. 1987a), with the exception of
`the Dl.3 complex in which a 4.0 A cutoff was used.
`'Only segments in direct contact are counted.
`•References of structure reports: DI .3 (Amil et al. 1986); HyHEL-5 (Sheriff et al. 1987b; Davies et al.
`1988; HyHel-10 (Davies el al. 1988). Additional data for HyHEL-10 were kindly provided by E.A.
`Padlan and D.R. Davies prior to publication (E.A. Padlan et al., in pr~p.).
`
`6 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1101
`
`

`

`~~~-----------------. . !,·~
`
`CRYSTAL STRUCTURES OF NA-ANTIBODY COMPLEXES
`
`263
`
`Sheriff provided data for buried surface areas. This
`work was supported by a Commonwealth Postgraduate
`Research Award to W.R.T. and by U.S. Public Health
`Service research grants Al-21659, AI-08831, AI-20591,
`and AI-19084 from the National Institute of Allergy
`and Infectious Diseases.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Air, G .M., L.R. Ritchie, W.G. Laver, and P.M. Colman .
`influenza
`1985. Gene and protein sequence of an
`neuraminidase with haemagglutinin activity. Virology
`14S: 117.
`Air, G.M., R.G. Webster, P.M. Colman, and W.G. Laver.
`1987. Distribution of sequence differences in influenza N9
`neuraminidase of tern and whale viruses and crystallization
`of the whale neuraminidase complexed with antibodies.
`Virology 160: 346.
`Amit, A .G., R.A. Mariuzza, S.E.V. Phillips, and R.J. Poljak.
`1986. Three-dimensional structure of an antigen-antibody
`complex at 2.8 A resolution. Science 233: 747 .
`Baker, A.T., J .N. Varghese , W.G . Laver, G.M . Air, and P.M.
`Colman. 1987. Three-dimensional structure of neura(cid:173)
`minidase of subtype N9 from an avian influenza virus.
`Proteins 2: 111.
`Berek, C. and C. Milstein. 1987. Mutation drift and repertoire
`shift in the maturation of the immune response. Immunol.
`Rev. 96: 23.
`Brunger, A.T. 1988. Crystallographic refinement by simulated
`annealing. Application to a 2.8 A resolution structure of
`aspartate aminotransferase. J. Mo/. Biol. 203: 803.
`Chothia, C. and A.M. Lesk. 1987. Canonical structures for
`the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. J. Mo/.
`Biol. 196: 901.
`Chothia, C. , A.M . Lesk, M. Levitt , A.G . Amit, R.A . Mariuz(cid:173)
`za, S.E.V. Phillips, and R .J . Poljak . 1986. The predicted
`structure of immunoglobulin D 1.3 and its comparison with
`the crystal structure . Science 233: 755 .
`Colman, P.M. 1988. Structure of antibody-antigen complexes:
`Implications for immune recognition . Adv. Immunol.
`43:99.
`Colman, P.M., W.G. Laver, J .N. Varghese, A.T. Baker, P.A .
`Tulloch, G.M. Air, and R.G. Webster. 1987. Three(cid:173)
`dimensional structure of a complex of antibody with in(cid:173)
`fluenza virus neuraminidase. Nature 326: 358.
`Colman, P.M., W.R. Tulip , J .N. Varghese, A.T. Baker, W.G.
`Laver, G.M . Air, and R .G. Webster . 1989. 3-D structures
`of influenza virus neuraminidase-antibody structures.
`Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 323: 511.
`Connolly , M.L. 1983. Analytical molecular surface calcula(cid:173)
`tion . J. Appl. Crystallogr. 16: 548.
`Davies, D.R. and H. Metzger. 1983. Structural basis of anti(cid:173)
`body function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1: 87.
`Davies, D .R., S. Sheriff, and E .A. Padlan. 1988. Minireview:
`Antigen-antibody complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 263: 10541.
`Greenblatt, H.M., C.A. Ryan, and M.N.G. James. 1989.
`Structure of the complex of Streptomyces griseus protein-
`
`ase Band polypeptide chymotrypsin inhibitor-1 from Rus(cid:173)
`set Burbank potato tubers at 2.1 A resolution. J. Mo/.
`Biol. 20S: 201.
`Hendrickson, W.A. and J .H. Konnert. 1981. Stereochemically
`restrained crystallographic least-squares refinement of
`macromolecule structures. In Biomolecular structure, con(cid:173)
`formation, function, and evolution (ed. R. Srinivasan), vol.
`1, p. 43. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
`Jones, T.A. 1985. Interactive computer graphics: FRODO .
`Methods Enzymol. HS: 157.
`Kabat, E .A ., T .T. Wu, M. Reid-Miller, H .M. Perry, and K.S.
`Gottesman. 1987. Sequences of proteins of immunological
`interest, 4th edition . U.S. Public Health Service, National
`Institutes of Health , Washington, D.C.
`Lascombe, M.-B., P.M. Alzari, G . Boulot, P. Saludjian, P.
`Tougard, C. Berek, S. Haba, E.M. Rosen, A. Nishonhoff,
`and R.J. Poljak. 1989. Three-dimensional structure of Fab
`R19.9, a monoclonal murine antibody specific for the p(cid:173)
`azobenzenearsonate group. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 86: 607.
`Laver, W.G., R.G. Webster, and P.M . Colman. 1987. Crystals
`of antibodies complexed with influenza virus neuraminid(cid:173)
`ase show isosteric binding of antibody to wild-type and
`variant antigens. Virology 1S6: 181 .
`Laver, W.G ., P.M . Colman, R.G . Webster, V.S . Hinshaw,
`and G .M. Air. 1984. Influenza virus neuraminidase with
`haemagglutinin activity. Virology 137: 314.
`Lee, B. and F.M. Richards. 1971. The interpretation of pro(cid:173)
`tein structures: Estimation of static accessibility. J. Mo/.
`Biol. SS: 379.
`Luzzati, V. 1952. Statistical treatment of errors in the determi(cid:173)
`nation of crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. S: 802.
`Mariuzza, R.A., S.E.V. Phillips, and R.J. Poljak. 1987. The
`structural basis of antigen-antibody recognition. Annu.
`Rev. Biophys. Chem. 16: 139.
`Satow, Y., G.H. Cohen, E.A. Padlan, and D .R. Davies. 1986.
`Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin Fab McPC603 .
`An X-ray diffraction study at 2.7 A. J. Mo/. Biol. 190: 593.
`Sheriff, S. , W.A. Hendrickson, and J .L. Smith. 1987a. Struc(cid:173)
`ture of myohemerythrin in the azidomet state at 1. 7I1. 3 A
`resolution . J. Mo/. Biol. 197: 273 .
`Sheriff, S., E.W. Silverton, E .A. Padlan, G.H. Cohen, S.J .
`Smith-Gill, B.C. Finzel , and D.R. Davies. 1987b. Three(cid:173)
`dimensional structure of an antibody-antigen complex.
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 84: 8(175 .
`Tulloch, P.A., P.M. Colman, P.C. Davis, W.G. Laver, R.G.
`Webster, and G.M. Air. 1986. Electron and X-ray diffrac(cid:173)
`tion studies of influenza neuraminidase complexed with
`monoclonal antibodies. J. Mot. Biol. 190: 215.
`Varghese, J.N., W.G. Laver, and P.M. Colman. 1983. Struc(cid:173)
`ture of the influenza virus glycoprotein antigen neura(cid:173)
`minidase at 2.9 A resolution . Nature 303: 35.
`Webster, R .G ., G.M. Air, D.W. Metzger, P.M. Colman, J.N.
`Varghese, A.T . Baker, and W.G. Laver. 1987. Antigenic
`influenza virus N9
`in an
`structure and variation
`neuraminidase . J. Virol. 61: 2910.
`Wlodawer, A., J . Deisenhofer, and R. Huber. 1987. Com(cid:173)
`parison of two highly refined structures of bovine pan(cid:173)
`creatic trypsin inhibitor. J. Mo/. Biol. 193: 145.
`
`7 of 7
`
`BI Exhibit 1101
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket