throbber
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 845-848, March 1974
`
`Variable Region Sequences of Five Human Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains
`
`
`
`of the V Hiil Subgroup� Definitive Identification of Four Heavy
`
`Chain Hypervariable Regions
`
`
`
`(myeloma proteins/amino acid sequences/antibody combining site)
`
`J. DONALD CAPRA AND J. MICHAEL KEHOE
`
`Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York, 10 East 102 Street, New York, N.Y. 10029
`
`Communicated by Henry G. Kunkel, N()llem.ber 5, 1973
`
`at residue 426 (12) so proteins Zap and Tur both
`
`rL�J�-!
`-WL�
`
`10 H
`
`10 eo
`
`ABSTRACT The variable regions of five human immu­
`
`kappa), and Tur (IgAl kappa) were isolated from serum or
`
`
`noglobulin heavy chains of the VBIII subgroup have been
`
`plasma by zone electrophoresis on polyvinyl copolymer
`totally sequenced. Three of the heavy chains belonged to
`
`("Pevicon") (8). After further purification by gel filtration
`the lgG class and two to the lgA cla88. Examination of
`
`
`chromatography, they were reduced with 0.1 M P-mercapto­
`
`"these sequences, and comparison with additional pub­
`lished heavy chain sequences, showed that a total of four
`
`ethanol and alkylated with iodoacetamide. The heavy
`
`of human heavy hypervariable regions is characteristic
`
`
`
`and light chains were separated by gel filtration in propionic
`
`chain variable regions.
`acid (9, 10).
`The relatively con�rved character of large segments of
`
`
`The conserved segments, which are those sections
`
`the heavy chain variable region was very evident in these
`Fragment Preparation: Heavy chains were treaW with
`studies.
`
`
`
`cyanogen bromide (11) and the resujting individual frag­
`located outside tlie hypervariable regions, comprise ap­
`
`
`
`ments purified by gel filtration chromatography in 5 M guani­
`
`
`proximately 65% of the total heavy chain variable region.
`dine · HCI. Three proteins (Tei, Zap, and Tur) yielded a
`
`The following general struciural pattern for antibody
`
`molecules emerges from this and related stud.ies: an over­
`
`large N-terminal fragment comprising residues 1-85. Pro­
`
`all combining region superstructure is provided by the
`teins Was and Jon, which contain a methionine residue at
`more conserved segments while the refinements of the
`position 34, gave fragments comprising residues 1-34 and
`
`active site specificity are a function of hypervariable re­
`
`3&-85. Since alf human IgG myelomas have a methionine �t
`gions.
`
`position 252, Tei and Was yielded a large fragment comprising
`The antibody combining site is now believed to reside ex­
`·residues 86-252. In protein Jon; however, an additional
`
`clusively in the variable regions of the heavy and light poly­
`
`methionine was present at position 111. Consequently two
`
`peptide chains of the immunoglobulin molecule. Evidence
`distinct
`
`fragments comprising residues 86-111 and 112-252
`
`
`is accumulating from several laboratories which indicates
`were obtained from this protein. IgAl proteins contain a
`
`that hypervariable regions within the variable region are
`methionine
`
`directly involved in the antibody combining site as well as
`yielded a very large fragment composed of residues 86-426.
`
`
`
`
`being responsible, at least in part, for the idiotypic determi­
`Sequencirl{J Procedure. Positions 1-85: On both the intact
`
`nants of myeloma proteins and specific antibodies (1-5).
`heavy chain as well as on the 1-85 fragment, proteins Tei,
`
`The existence of three hypervariable regions in the vari­
`Zap, and Tur were sequenced 60 steps on the automated se­
`
`able region of human immunoglobulin heavy chains has been
`quencer (13, 14). Tryptic peptides were prepared and sepa­
`
`
`
`established by previous studies from this laboratory. Resi­
`
`rated on Dowex 50 X 4 with a pyridine-formate buffer system.
`dues 31-37 were described as the first hypervariable region
`
`In proteins Tei and Zap two invariant peptides were aligned
`
`of the heavy chain (6), and, after fragmentation of lgG
`by homology alone (70-74 and 7&-78) while in protein Tur,
`
`heavy chains with cyanogen bromide, two additional hyper­
`
`variable regions were localized between residues 86-91 and
`1 8
`12,• 56
`HI HH ti H .H
`101-110 (7).
`We have now completed the amino acid sequence from
`
`residues 41 to 84 of the three Valli proteins originally re­
`. I
`ported (6, 7) as well as the complete V region sequence of
`two JgA proteins with VaIII variable regions. The data
`make apparent an additional
`ability between residues 51 and 68, thus supporting the ob­
`
`
`servations of Cebra et al. made on pooled guinea-pig immuno­
`
`globulins (5). When these data on VaIII proteins are in­
`10
`o
`30 40 so 60
`20
`
`
`cluded with that available for proteins of the Val and Vall
`TUBE NUMBER
`subgroups and analyzed by the method of Wu and Kabat (3),
`
`
`four distinct areas of sequence hypervariability are observed.
`Fro. I. Representative ion exchange chromatogram of tryptic
`
`hydrolysate of the amino terminal (1-S5) cyanogen bromide
`fragment of.a chain from protein Tur. Peptides were isolated
`
`area of sequence hypervari­
`
`6.0
`w
`0
`� 5.
`
`.
`
`MATERIALS AND MEmODS
`Mye/,oma Proteins. Tei (IgGl kappa, Gm az), Was (IgGl
`kappa, Gm az), Jon (IgG3 lambda, Gm g), Zap (IgAl
`
`845
`
`from a Dowex 50X4 column and characterized and analyzed as
`
`described in the te:.ct.
`
`1 of 4
`
`BI Exhibit 1092
`
`

`

`846
`
`Immiinology: Capra and Kehoe
`
`Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 71 (1974)
`
`10
`
`20
`
`Zap
`
`Tur -------�LEO- -------------------------------------
`
`30
`Tei GLY PRB TBR PRB UR TBR SER ALA VAL TYR (
`ASP __ MB T _ (
`TRP MBT LYS (
`
`... --- SER -----
`Jon -----------'ALA
`
`so
`40
`J TRP VAL ARG GUI ALA PRO GLY LYS GLY LEO GLU TRP VAL
`J ---------------------­
`] --------------------
`
`Zap
`
`TUr
`
`'1'BR SD MG Piii!: (
`
`AitG VAL LEU SER SER (
`
`70
`60
`Tei GLY TRP ARG TYR GLU GLY SER SER LEO TRR BIS TYR ALA VAL SD VAL GlJI GLY ARG PRE TBR DZ SZR AR(; ASlf
`GUf GLl1 ALA _. A.Sir SER
`waa ALA
`LYS
`Jon VAL ___ VAL GlJI VAL VAL GLO LY8 ALA PRB
`ALA ILE SD ----- ASP ----- ALA -------------
`VAL GUI
`Zap GLU PBB
`· Au. -----------------
`PHE -----
`
`ASP TBR
`
`ASlf ---------------
`
`ASK --- ASlf ---------------
`
`TUr SER GLY
`
`LEU ASN Au. ---
`
`ASN LEU
`
`so
`Tei �������LEtJ��LEU������TBRALAVAL���Au.�
`
`90
`
`l.oo
`
`Waa ------------------ AS• ARG
`
`Jon ------------------- ILE
`
`ALA _____________ .;_ ___ __
`VAL TBR --------------------
`
`
`Zap -------------------�N TBR GLY
`ALA ------------------
`
`TUr ------------------------ GIB ALA ------- LEO ---------
`
`110
`120
`Tei VAL TBR PRO ALA ALA ALA SER i.Eu MR PRE SER Au. VAL TRP GLY GIB GLY 'ftlR LEU VAL TBR
`) - PHE ASP - PHB -----------­
`] SER MET ASP ----------- PRO ----
`
`---
`
`ASP ---------------
`
`SER
`
`Waa PHE ARG GIB PRO PRE VAL GIB
`Jon _ VAL VAL SER TBR [
`Zap THR ARG
`Gr.Y GLY � (
`
`TUr LEU SER VAL TBR
`
`VAL
`
`ALA PHE ASP������-------- LYS
`
`SER
`
`Fm. 2. The amincracid sequence of the variable regions of five human immunoglobulin heavy chains.
`
`the isolation of chymotryptic peptides established the se­
`quence unambiguously. In all cases, tryptic peptides were
`sequenced in the automated sequencer, often using 4-sulfo­
`phenylisothiocyanate (Pierce Chemical) on the lysine pep­
`tides (15). In proteins Was and Jon, which contained cyano­
`gen bromide fragments 1-34 and 35-85, the first 60 residues
`were established by automated sequencing of the intact
`heavy chain. Thus,
`in these two proteins, sequencing
`cyanogen bromide fragment 1-34 was superfluous since its
`composition agreed with the previously determined sequence.
`
`Fragment 35-85 of proteins Was and Jon was sequenced 35
`and 40 residues respectively; this, together with the C­
`terminal tryptic peptides mentioned above gave the com­
`plete sequence for this section. Ruidues 86-JSt: In proteins
`Tei, Was, Zap, and Tur the sequence was established by a
`continuous automated run of 45 steps from residue· 86 into
`the Cal domain. In both Zap and Tur, tryptic digestion and
`isolation of the resulting peptides confirmed a few question­
`able positions. In protein Jon, residues 86-111 were obtained
`disulfide linked to residues 1-34 after cyanogen bromide
`
`2 of 4
`
`BI Exhibit 1092
`
`

`

`Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.. U8A 71 (1974)
`
`digestion. This sequence was obtained by difference since
`residues 1-34 were known from the initial study of the
`intact heavy chain. Jon fragment 112-253 was subjected to a
`long sequencer run which definitely established the sequence
`of residues 112-121 as well as providing sequence data into
`the Cal domain.
`
`Ion Exchange Chromatography. An example of a Dowex
`50X4 chromatogram is shown in Fig. 1 for a tryptic digest
`of the Tur 1-85 fragment; 6.5-ml fractions were collected and
`0.1 ml of each fraction analyzed by the fluorescamine pro­
`cedure initially described by Udenfriend et al. (16). Ninhydrin
`analysis was also performed after alkaline digestion of 0.5-ml
`aliquots. In most analyses, only the fluorescamine procedure
`was employed since it was much more sensitive. As shown in
`Fig. 1, 10 fractions were pooled. Each was subjected to amino­
`acid analysis and several useful peptides were isolated and
`sequenced. T-1 (Asn Thr Leu Tyr Leu Gin Hsr) (79-85), T-3
`(Asn Asp Ser Lys) (75-78), T-7 (Gly Leu Gly Trp Val Ser
`Gly Arg) (46-53), and T-10 (Phe Thr Ile Ser Arg) (7(}-74).
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`The amino-acid sequences of the variable regions of the
`five human myeloma proteins is displayed in Fig. 2. The
`variability-factor values determined by the method of Wu
`and Kabat (3) for these as well as all the other human V
`region sequences available is shown in Fig. 3. These calcula­
`tions were based on 25 sequences from residues 1 to 34, 11
`sequences from residues 35 to 85, and 14 sequences from
`residues 86 to 122. Previous to this study there were only six
`published complete V region sequences, all but one (Nie) of
`the Val (Eu) or Vall (Daw, Cor, He, Ou) subgroup (for
`references see legend to Fig. 3). With five additional VBIII
`sequences the variability within and between subgroups can
`now be compared more meaningfully. In addition, with the
`availability of 11 complete sequences and several fragments,
`the Wu-Kabat plot becomes more statistically significant.
`A discussion of the sequences can be conveniently divided
`into those sections of the V region which are relatively con­
`stant (1-30, 38-50, 69-83, 92-100, and 111-121), and the
`hypervariable regions (31-37, 51-68, 84-91, and 101-110).
`About 653 of the variable region of the heavy chain shows
`limited variation. In fact, there are 17 positions (143) which
`have been absolutely invariant in all human heavy chains
`regardless of their V region subgroup assignment. Certain
`positions are subgroup specific since at these positions all,
`or nearly all, of the mem hers of one subgroup have a particular
`amino acid, while members of the other subgroup contain a
`different amino acid. Utilizing the four available Vall
`proteins, positions 3, 9,16, 17, 19, 21, 23, 28, 29, 39, 42, 46, 50,
`80, 81 and 82 appear to be subgroup specific. As noted
`previously, no subgroup specific residues are identifiable in
`the C terminal portion of the V region (7). There are thus
`33 positions (273) in the V region which are either invariant
`or subgroup specific. A comparison with the published se­
`quences of myeloma proteins (17, 18), pooled immuno­
`globulins (5, 19, 20), and specifically purified antibodies (5,
`21-23) from lower species, indicates that the particular
`amino acids found at these positions are characteristic of a
`wide variety of mammals and have been faithfully conserved
`during evolution. Such residues may have eid.remely im­
`portant attributes for variable region function such as, for
`
`Human Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains
`GAP
`GAP
`GAP
`
`A
`
`W
`
`AW
`
`847
`
`70
`60
`50
`40
`30
`20
`10
`10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 IOO 110 120
`o..11111•·-�
`POSITION
`Fig. 1 as well as several other published sequences (36) deter­
`
`FIG. 3. Variability-factor values for the sequences shown in
`
`mined according to the method of Wu and Kabat (3).
`
`example, the provision of a distinct backbone structure which
`is crucial to antibody function.
`As can be seen on inspection of Figs. 2 and 3, about a third
`of the heavy chain variable region can be considered "hyper­
`variable." These regions deserve special consideration be­
`cause of their specific implications for the formation of the
`antibody combining site, the nature of idiotypic determinants,
`and various theoretical conceptions of the origin of antibody
`diversity.
`In light chains, affinity labels have been localized near or
`within hypervariable regions (23-25), thus providing direct
`support for the general concept that hypervariable regions
`participate directly in the antibody-combining site. For the
`heavy chain, recent work has also been consistent with this
`idea. For example, Ray and Cebra localized affinity labels to
`the first (31-37) and the fourth (101-110) heavy chain
`hypervariable regions (26), Haimovich et al. (27) localized
`an affinity label to residue 54 of the mouse myeloma protein
`315 (which has anti-dinitrophenol activity), and Press and
`coworkers have localized affinity labels at or near the fourth
`hypervariable region in rabbit antibodies (28). Therefore,
`although the primary structure and affinity labeling studies
`of these proteins was being carried out independently, and
`even in different laboratories in many instances, there is a gen­
`eral implication from the experimental observations that the
`same regions of the molecule which show the highest degree
`of sequence variation are near or part of those particular re­
`gions of the heavy chain where affinity labels have been local­
`ized.
`A second piece of evidence linking the antibody combining
`site to the hypervariable regions has come fr.om comparisons
`of sequences obtained from pooled immunoglobulin heavy
`chains with those of specifically purified antibody heavy
`chains. Sequence analyses of rabbit (29), guinea pig (5), and
`other mammalian heavy chain pools (19), indicate that a
`definitive sequence cannot be obtained within those regions
`which have been identified as hypervariable on the basis
`of studies with myeloma proteins. However, when specifically
`purified antibodies are studied, a single major sequence can be
`determined, as has been shown most definitively by Cebra and
`his coworkers (5).
`Additional support for the functional significance of hyper­
`variable regions has been provided by current notions con­
`cerning the tertiary structure of the immunoglobulin mole­
`cule. Crystallographic analysis of human immunoglobulins
`has now advanced to the point where it has been possible
`to assign the residues which may line a "pocket" within the
`
`3 of 4
`
`BI Exhibit 1092
`
`

`

`848
`
`Immunology: Capra. and Kehoe
`
`Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 71 (1974)
`
`are involved in the idiotypic
`
`play a crucial role in the antigen binding function of immuno­
`
`8. Kunkel, H. G. (1954) Method.8 Bi-Ochem. Anal. 1, 141-155.
`immunoglobulin molecule which presumably represents the
`
`
`9. Fleischman, J. G., Porter, R. R. & Press, E. M. (1963)
`
`combining site itself (30, 31). In each instance, the major
`Biochem. J. 88, 220-228.
`
`residues which line the pocket are associable with hyper­
`10. Capra, J. D. & Kunkel, H. G. (1970) J. Clin. Invest. 49,
`
`
`variable regions. In addition, the conformational models
`610-621.
`11. Gross, E. & Witkop, B. (1962) J. Biel. Chem. 237, 1856-
`
`generated by the nearest neighbor calculations of Kabat and
`1863.
`
`W11 (32) place hypervariable regions in close as.sociation
`12. Chuang, C. Y., Capra, J. D. & Kehoe, J.M. (1973) Nature
`with the putative combining site.
`244, 15&-160.
`There is also growing evidence that at least some of the
`13. Edman, P. & Begg, F. (1967)Eur. J. Bi-Ochem. l, 80-91.
`14. Capra, J. D. & Kunkel, H. G. (1970) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
`hypervariable regions
`determi­
`USA67,87-92.
`
`nants of myeloma proteins and antibodies. Cross idiotypic
`15. Inman, J. K., Hannon, J.E. & Appella., E. (1972) Bi-Ochem.
`
`
`specificity among the cold agglutinins (33) and the anti­
`Biophys. Res. Commun. 46, 2075-2081.
`
`gamma globulins (34) is believed to be related to the com­
`S., Stein, S., Bohlen, P., Dairrnan, W., Leim­
`16. Udenfriend,
`
`bining site. In at least two distinct anti-gamma globulin
`gruber, W. & Wiegele, M. (1972) Science, 178, 881-882.
`17. Kehoe, J. M. & Capra, J. D. (1972) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
`molecules,
`
`
`the hypervariable regions show striking sequence
`USA 69, 2052-2055.
`
`similarities (7, 35).
`M. & de Preval, C. (1972) Eur. J.
`
`18. Bourgois, A., Fougerea.u,
`The genetic origin of hypervariable regions remains un­
`
`Bicchem. 24, 446-455.
`
`clear. The variability within heavy chain hypervariable
`19. Capra, J. D., Wasserman, R. W. & Kehoe, J. M. (1973) J.
`regions seems more marked than that of light chain hyper­
`Exp. Med. 138, 41Q-427.
`Of the 11 proteins which have now had their
`20. Mole, L. E., Jackson, S. A., Porter, R.R. & Wilkinson,
`J. M.
`
`variable regions.
`(1971) Bi-Ochem. J. 124, 301-318.
`
`V regions completely sequenced, if one considers
`the 43
`
`21. Fleischman, J.B. (1973) Immunochemistry 10, 401-407.
`
`
`hypervariable positions of the heavy chain, there are no two
`22. Strosberg, A. D., Jaton, J. C., Capra, J. D. & Haber, E.
`proteins which have more than 10 residues in common. It
`(1972) Fed. Proc. 31, 771.
`seems likely that hundreds, or even thousands, of proteins
`23. Goetz!, E. J. & Metzger, H. (1970) Bi-Ochemistry 9, 1267-
`1278.
`would have to be sequenced in order to find two which are
`24. Franek, F. (1971) Eur. J. Bicchem. 19, 176-183.
`
`
`
`identical if no preselection bias (such as selection by idiotypic
`25. Chesebro, B. & Metzger, H. (1972) Bi-Ochemistry 11, 766-
`
`
`antisera or for combining specificity) is involved. This im­
`771.
`plies either that there are a very large number of germ
`26. Ray, A. & Cebra, J. J. (1972) Bicchemistry 11, 3647-3657.
`
`27. Haimovich, J., Eisen, H. N., Hurwitz, E. & Givol, D. (1972)
`
`line genes or that somatic processes are necessary to explain
`Bicchemistry 11, 2389-2397.
`
`
`the diversity in the heavy chain hypervariable regions.
`28. Press, E. M., Fleet, G. W. J. & Fisher, C. E. (1971) in
`
`
`Regardless of their origin, the hypervariable regions clearly
`Progress in Immunology, ed. Amos, B. (Academy Press,
`New York), p. 233.
`globulin molecules.
`
`29. Cebra., J. J., Givol, D. & Porter, R.R. (1968) Bi-Ochem. J.
`107,69-70.
`We thank D r. Henry Kunkel for the subclass and genetic
`tw
`30. Schiffer, M., Girling, R. L., Ely, K. R. & Edmundson, A. B.,
`ing of the myeloma. proteins.
`Bonnie Gerber, Ellen Bogner and
`personal communication.
`technical assistance. This
`Donna Atherton rendered invaluable
`31. Poljak, R. J. (1973) Abstracts of Ninth Internaticnal Con­
`work was aided by grants from the National Science Foundation
`(GB 17046) and the U.S. Public Health Service (Al 09810) and a
`gress of Bicchemistry-Stockholm, p. 31.
`32. Ka.bat, E. A. & Wu, T. T. (1972) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA
`
`Grant-in-Aid from the New York Heart Association. J.D.C. is the
`69, 96Q-964.
`of National Institutes of Health Career Development
`recipient
`33. Williams, R. C., Kunkel, H. G. & Capra, J. D. (1968)
`
`Award 6-K4-GM-35, and J.M.K. is an Established Investigator
`of the American Heart Association.
`Science 161, 379-381.
`34. Kunkel, H. G., Agnello, V., Joslin, F. G., Winchester, R. J.
`& Capra, J. D. (1973)J. Exp. Med. 137, 331-342.
`35. Capra, J. D. & Kehoe, J.M., unpublished observations.
`(a) Edelman, G. M., Cunningham, B. A., Gall, W. E., Gott­
`36.
`U., & Waxdal, M. J. (1969) Proc.
`lieb, P. D., Rutishauser,
`Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 63, 78-85; (b) Press, E. M. & Hogg, N.
`M. (1970) Bicchem. J. 117, 641--660; {c) Cunningham, B. A.,
`U. & Edelman, G. M. (1969)
`Pflumro, M. N., Rutisha.user,
`Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 64, 997-1003; (d) Wikler, M.,
`
`Kohler, H., Shinoda, T. & Putnam, F. W. (1969) Science 163,
`
`
`75-78; (e) Ponstingl, H., Schwarz, J., Reichel, W. & Hilsch­
`mann, N.(1970) Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physic!. Chem. 351, 1591.
`
`C. (1967) Nature 216, 330-332.
`1. Milstein,
`
`2. Franek, F. (1969) Symposium on Developmental Aspects of
`
`Antibody Format:iun and Structure, Prague.
`3. Wu, T. T. & Kabat, E. A. (1970) J. Exp. Med. 132, 221-250.
`4. Capra, J. D., Kehoe, J. M., Winchester, R. & Kunkel, H. G.
`(1971) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 190, 371-381.
`5. Cebra, J. J., Ray, A., Benjamin, D. & Birshtein, B. (1971)
`Progr. Immunol. (First International Congress of Immunol­
`ogy), 269-284.
`D. (1971) Nature New Biel. 230, 61-63.
`6. Capra, J.
`7. Kehoe, J. M. & Capra, J. D. (1971) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
`USA 68, 2019-2021.
`
`4 of 4
`
`BI Exhibit 1092
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket