throbber
34. B. R. Cullen, il1UI.. "6, 973 (1986).
`35. P. E. Pcllctt, K. G. Kousoulas, L. P. Pereira, B.
`Roiz.man,J. Virol. 53, 243 (1985).
`36. J. D. Dignam, R. M. Lcbovitz, R. G. Roeder,
`Nwki&.A.cills RR. 11, 1475 (1983).
`37. Supported by the National Cancer Institute (grants
`CAOM94 and CA19264), the National Institute for
`(grant Ail.24009),
`Al1crgy and Infectious DUcascs
`
`the United Scares Public Hcahh Service, and the
`American Canccr Society (MV2W). N.M., T.M.K.,
`and D.S. were prcdoaoral trainees ot'USPHS train­
`ing grants AI07099, CA09241, and GM7281, re­
`
`spectively
`
`.
`
`23 October 1987; acceptcd 31Dcccmbcr
`
`1987
`
`Reshaping Human Antibodies: Grafting an
`Antilysozyme Activity
`
`quenced as described (7). To reshape the
`NEW heavy chain, we started from a syn­
`thetic gene in an Ml3 vector (Fig. lb)
`containing the framework regions of human
`NEW and the CDR.s from mouse antibody
`Bl-8 (5). Long oligonuclcotides with multi­
`ple mismatches with the template (8) were
`used to replace each of the hypcrvariablc
`loops in tum by site-directed mutagcnesis:
`the central mismatched portion of the ·prim­
`er encoded each CDR of the Dl.3 heavy
`chain, and the 5' and 3' ends of the primer
`were complementary to the Banking frame­
`work regions. Thus after three rounds of
`mutagcncsis, the reshaped gene (Hu V H­
`LYS) encoded the framework regions of
`NEW with the hypcrvariablc regions of
`Dl.3 (Figs. le and 2). This was assembled
`with the heavy-chain constan
`t region of
`human immunoglobulin G2 (HulgG2) (9)
`to give the plasmid pSVgpt-HuVHLYS­
`HulgG2. The plasmid was transfcctod by
`clcctroporation ( 10) into the mycloma line
`J558L (11), which secretes
`a mouse
`�light
`chain. Transfcctants resistant to mycophen­
`olic acid were screen ed for secreti on of
`immunoglobulin by �cl electrophoresis of
`supematants from [3 S]mcthioninc-labcled
`cells. The scacted product (HuVHLYS­
`HulgG2, X) was purified on protein A­
`Scpharosc ; the � light chain was exch�
`for the Dl.3 K light chain in vitro; and the
`HuVHLYS-HulgG2, K antiboqy was puri­
`fied (12). In parallel experiments as contro�
`the mouse Dl.3 variable region (MoVff.
`LYS) was attached to the heavy-chain con­
`stant region of mouse IgGl (MolgGl) in
`a pSVgpt vector
`(pSVgpt-MoVHLYS­
`MolgGl), and antibody was expressed and
`rcassociatod as above (Fig. ld).
`ce quench was used to measure
`Fluorescen
`
`MARTINE VBRHOEYBN, CESAR MILSTEIN, GREG WINTER*
`The production of therapeutic human monodooal antibodies by hybridoma ttcb.nolo­
`gy bas proved difticult, and this bas prompted the "humanizing" of mouse monodooal
`antibodies by recombinant DNA techniques. It waa shown pRViously that the binding
`site for a small bapten could be grafted from the heavy-chain variable domain of a
`mouse antibody to that of a human mydoma protein by transplanting the bypcrvaria­
`blc loops. It is now shown that a large binding site for a protein antigen (lyacnyme) can
`also be transplantcd from mouse
`heavy chain. The success
`to human
`of such
`constructions may be facilitated by an induced-fit mechanism.
`F Oil PASSIVE IMMUNITY Oil ANTIBODY
`of
`contrast, the three-dimensional structure
`the complex of lysozymc and the mouse
`, monoclonal anti­
`therapy in humans
`antibody Dl.3 has been solved (6), and
`bodies designed to eliminate toxins,
`viral and bacterial pathogens, or other cells
`about 690 A2 of the solvent-accessible sur­
`would ideally be of human origin (1). Un­
`face of the antibody is buried on complex
`formation. Both V H and light-chain variable
`fortunately it has proved difficult to make
`(V L) domains make c:xtcnsivc contacts to
`human monoclonal antibodies by hybrido­
`ma technology (2). Chimeric antibodies
`lysozymc, but most
`of the hydrogcn-bond­
`arc made to the CDR.s of the
`with mouse
`variable and human constant
`ing contacts
`domains have been constructed by linking
`heavy chain. Thus, of 12 hydrogen bond
`inn:tactiom proposed (6), 9 arc made to the
`together the genes encoding each domain
`binant anti­
`(3, 4), and expressing the recom
`heavy chain. We have� the hypcrvaria­
`blc loops of the human NEW heavy chain (5)
`bodies in myeloma cells. However, the
`mouse variable region may itself be seen as
`with those from the Dl.3 heavy chain.
`foreign (1). We have therefore attempted to
`The variable domains of the mouse anti­
`insert the antigen-binding sil'C of a mouse
`body to lysozymc were cloned and sc-
`antibody, rather than the whole variable
`Ha
`region, directly into a human antibody. In
`Fig. 1. Vectors for heavy-chain c:xprcssion. (a)
`L.,._ ..... v•tlfl'-... ---J8
`Mouse vNP gene (4) and designated hen: as
`previous work, the three heavy-chain hyper- L:..
`,.;;;...
`'°""'
`variable regions [or complementarity-deter-
`MoVaNP, (b) reshaped HuVNP gene (5) desig-
`Hb L
`natcd here as HuVaNP, (c) HuVaLYS gene
`mining rcgions (CDR.s)] from a mouse anti-
`HuVtlfl'
`8
`•
`' i •
`with the hcaty-chain constant region gene of
`'°""' eofla1
`2
`3
`body to a haptcn were transplanted onto the
`human
`IgG2, (d) MoVaLYS gene with the
`t region gene of mouse IgGl,
`framework regions of the heavy-chain vari-
`able (VH) domain of a human mycloma � i _:. ,,:"�:." •. u
`c
`heavy-chain constan
`� �
`immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer (Igh cnh)
`and(•) the backbone of the pSVgpt vector
`with
`protein. In combination with the mouse '°""' coRa1
`2
`,
`1tu111G2
`light chain, the
`(4). The Va domains arc denoted in black, stip-
`tightly to hapten (5). Although it seems �'°�.:. "'"�·�:.:,,.,.,.,._, �1: • C: �! �orana�:::;,=>�=
`reshaped heavy chain bound
`d
`likely that both heavy and light chains make
`1ysozymc (Dl.3), and human mycJoma protein
`e
`(NEW), respectively. The constant domaim arc
`contacts to the haptcn, the relative contribu-
`98 denoted in black or open boxes to signify sc-
`E EH
`tion of each chain is unknown. Nor is it clear
`qucoccs encoding mouse or human constant do-
`w
`y
`p o tc en
`th small h dro h b ·
`c
`hapt
`hcth
`Ecogpt
`mains. lg pro, heavy-chain promoter; L, leader
`NP (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophcnacctylaminocap-
`cxon;
`H, Hind ill B B HI S Sac I E, "-
`;
`, am ;
`,
`; ....,...
`roatc) simply binds to a hydrophobic pocket RI restriction sites. The reshaped NEW heavy chain was expressed from a vector derived from the
`HI fragment, oontains heavy-chain promoter
`at the base of the hypcrvariablc loops. By pSVgpt-HuVaNPvccror(b). ThustheHuVaNPgcnc,cloncdinitiallyinMl3mp9asaHindill-Bam
`, the CDRs of the Bl-8 antibody, and the framework
`•regions of human NEW (5). The CDRs of Bl-8 wen: then replaced with those of Dl.3 using Jong
`mutagcnicoligonuclcocidcs (sec Fig. 2). ThcHind ill-Barn HI fragment, now carrying the HuV51LYS
`scne (c) was excised from the Ml3 Vector and cloned into the pSV Vector (e) along with a Barn HI
`fragmen t encoding the heavy-chain constan
`pSVgpt-MoVaLYS-MolgGl vector to exp� recombinant Dl.3 is swnmari7.Cd in (d).
`t region of human IgG2 (9). The construction of the
`SCIBNCB, VOL. 239
`
`Medical Rcscardl <:.ounci1 Laborarory ofMolccular Biol­
`ogy, Hilb Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, England.
`*To whom rorrcspondc:ncc should be addrcacd.
`153.+
`
`• • •
`
`er
`
`1 of 3
`
`BI Exhibit 1068
`
`

`

`CDRs could be supported by the NEW
`Fig. 2. Sequence of the reshaped ��::.
`V H domain. The reshaped domain .....,.
`.._. _ •tart•
`HuV HLYS is based on the <:M:lW1C-11GMJtJ•toACart:Al•rGAGl'<TCllCAG1==11CAG:rrM::TGMJCAC11CAGG11a:TC
`framework regions with the same (or simi­
`lar) contacts as arc used with the Dl.3
`HuVHNP gene (4), with the frame.
`nating with the hypavariablc re­ (M G ! S C
`framework regions. However, we also iden­
`work regions of human NEW alter­
`tified some potential problems. For exam­
`gions of mouse 01.3 (7). Three ACM>T�MATGGGtGACMTGACATCCM:T1'TGCCT1'
`ple, in CDR..l of Dl.3, Tyr-32 makes a van
`oligonuclcotides I, II, and ill were
`der Waals contact with the Phc·27 in FRI;
`10
`Si!p!!l
`1
`5
`(Q V 8 S)Q V Q L Q £ S G P G L V R
`used to replace each of the Bl-8
`in NEW this phenylalanine is replaced by
`CDR.s with those from 01.3. Each
`15
`25
`30 ---2!!!!_
`serine, and this contact is therefore lost
`oligonµclcotidc has 12 nucleotides
`20
`V S G S T r S Oi.....l-lLJ =
`P S Q T L S L T C T
`at the 5' end and 12 nucleotides at
`when the ·Dl.3 CDRs arc mounted on
`the 3' end which ·arc complcmcn­
`tary to the NEW framework re- crlJ 11 v a 0 4� P G R G 4� e 11 I G 15a � c I
`NEW framework regions. Furthcnnore, in
`-UQTT'nlllGGT
`gions, whereas the central portion GTMAC
`antibody D 1.3 the loop includ.ir).g the end of
`encodes COR.s 1, 2, or 3 of the I P s� � P 6� "pr;-: IL t; s I a v T 7� L v o
`FRl bulges out from the surface, whereas in
`NEW (and other solved structures), it is
`01.3 antibody. The primers arc -�-----'----.---�--- P��r II
`L�
`pinned bade to the surface. Despite these
`c.omplcmcn� to the marked por•
`T 7� K N Q r 8� L a8� 8s cs v T 8! A D T A v
`tions of the coding sttand of the
`problcnu, the reshaped antibody is able to
`reshaped domain. Three rounds of
`io5
`mutagcncsis were used, transfcct- go
`•.5 Cll!J 100.
`bind lysozymc.
`x
`G s L
`Y c A R I ii a jCx a i p x I 11 G o
`mg. irito the EuheridtitJ coli .....,;"
`�.,....,
`It � conceivable that the several contacts
`TATTA���
`priller m
`BMH71-18mutL, plating on a
`made by the FRl/CDRl loop to lysozymc
`110
`v T v s s -1
`lawn of BMH71-18, and probing
`infected colonies with the mutagen- �. · · · · .3'
`make only a small contribution to the overall
`cncrgctics of binding. Problems in this re­
`ic primers as in (8). In washing the Mutagenic priMre are I 5' C'tG TCT CAC CCA GTT 'tAC NX ATA GCC
`filters, it was necessary to gradually � � � � � i:x:5�MTTGTCArCAC'tCCTCTM�CCATTTCTC�'�I�'� �
`gion would then have only a slight dfcct on
`increase the wash tcmpctaturc from NX CCA GTA GTC MG CC't ATA A'tC 'tC't ere TCT TGC ACA ArA 3'
`the affinity. It is also possible that the shape
`65° to 75°C to distinguish the mutant from wild-type doocs. The yield of mutants at each step was
`of the binding site could adjust to the
`about 5%.
`binding of antigen (18) and therefore that
`small errors in assembling the CD Rs on a
`new framework might be "self-correcting"
`when the antigen binds. The energetic price
`for such putative self-correcting induced fit
`would be low, given the small los.s in bind­
`ing affinity suggested by the competition
`data of Fig. 3. It is not possible to deduce
`the exact change in affinity from the compe­
`tition data, as the competition may only
`rcfk:ct the relative on-rates. However, even
`if the difference in affinities were tcnfoJd,
`this would correspond to no more than the
`lo.ss of a single hydrogen bond interaction
`(19). The shape of the antigenic cpitope
`could also adjust to the binding of antibody
`(20), although no structural change in lyso­
`zymc was detected in its complex with the
`mouse D 1.3 antibody (is). Furthermore, the
`whole surface of interaction could reorien­
`tate slightly, perhaps by � on side
`chains (21), to make a set of new contacts.
`This is an attractive model fur large surfaces
`making multiple interactions. Thus sclf-cor­
`rcction could occur at' the level of the anti­
`body, the antigen, or the complex.
`In conclusion, the structure of antibodies
`may incorporate fC1llU.rCS that ass� the
`grafting of hypcrvariablc regions. The criti­
`cal features arc that framework contacts arc
`largely COQSCrved between Vu and V L qo­
`mains, between the sheets within a domain,
`and to the CDR 'loops. In addition, the
`shape of the antigen binding s.itc or the
`antigenic determinant (or both) might be
`able to adjust to each other in an induced-fit
`mechanism.
`JlBFBJlBNCBS AND NOTBS
`
`Fig. 3. Competition of reshaped and cnginccrcd
`mouse antibody for lysozymc. The wells of a
`microritcr plate were ooattd with lysozymc at a
`concentration of 100 µ.g/ml in pbosphatc-buiF­
`crcd saline (PBS), and remaining binding sites on
`the plastic were blcxktd with 1 % bovine scnim
`albumin (in PBS). The binding of 12'J-labclcd
`mouse �tibody 01.3 (specific activity, >0.6 "'Ci
`per micrograms ofOl.3) to lysozymc was com­
`peted with in=ing coocmttari� of(•) cngi­
`nccrcd antibody (MoVHLYS-MolgGl, K) or (0)
`reshaped antibody (HuVHLYS-HulgG2, K), and
`the data presented arc typical of two independent
`cxpcrimcnts. Antibody 01.3 and reassembled
`antibody D 1.3 competed with the Jabclcd 01.3 as
`effectively as did the cnginccrcd antibody 01.3.
`Radioiodination was carried out by the chlora·
`mine T method (22).
`
`the binding oflysozymc to thes<: antibodies.
`The binding to both antibodies was tight,
`with 2 mol oflysozymc molecules binding l
`mol of antibody. Our results indicate that
`the affinity is better than 5 nM, although
`previous work had indicated a val� of 20 to
`40 nM (6, 13). The antibodies were then
`compared in a competition assay fur lyso­
`zymc; 125I-labeled mouse antibody Dl.3
`competing with mouse antibody or with the
`reshaped antibody for binding to lysozymc.
`The reshaped antibody oompctcs, albeit less
`effectively (about tenfold less) than the
`mouse antibody (Fig. 3). Nevertheless, the
`grafting of hypcrvariablc regions from
`mouse to human framework regions is suffi­
`cient to tranSfcr the lysozymc-binding site,
`an extensive surface of interaction, despite
`the 31 of87 residues that differ between the
`hcavy-chaµt framework regions.
`The results confirm that the hypcrvariablc
`2S MAii.CH 1988
`
`0.1
`
`10 20
`1
`Competing etlbody (µgtml)
`
`regions (mainly loops) fashion the antigcn­
`binding site and that the more conserved
`regions (mainly �-sheet) form a structural
`framework (14). However, the result is re­
`mark.able given the several asswnptions un­
`d«lying the building of an antigen-binding
`site on a new framework regi�ly.
`( i) the V ti and V L domains pack together in
`the same way (15), (ii) the two �-sheets
`within each variable domain pack together
`in the same way (16), (iii) die antigen
`usually binds to the hypcrvariablc regions,
`and (iv) the hypcrvariablc regions arc sup­
`ported by tfic framcwQrk regions in a similar
`way (17). In particular, the hypcrvariablc
`loops arc not stand-alone struc:turcs, but
`make cxtmSivc contacts to the framework
`and to other hypcrvariablc regions. Since
`the aystallographic structures of both par­
`ent antibodies arc known, we could con1irm
`that in the reshaped antibody, the Dl.3
`
`l. lL A. Miller, A. IL Oscroff, P. T. Stnae, IL Levy,
`BU!otl 62, 988 (1983).
`
`llBPOllTS IS35
`
`2 of 3
`
`BI Exhibit 1068
`
`

`

`to 2 mg of antibody (in I ml) was dialy7.cd over­
`2. 0. A. Carson and B. 0. Freimark, Aih. !MMUnol.
`16. A. M. Lcsk and C. J. Chothia, ihi4. 160, 325
`night at 4"C against O.SM tris, pH 8.0, (ii) intcr­
`38, 275 (1986).
`chain disul6dcs were reduced with O. lM 2-mcrcap­
`(1982).
`3. G. L. Bouliannc, N. Hozum.i, M. J. Shulman,
`17. C. Chothia and A. M. Lcsk., ihi4. 196, 901 (1987).
`S. L. Morrison,
`fi:ec sulfhydryls were alkylated with O. lSM iodoacc­
`PeptiAt:s llS Anli!Jms, R. Porter and J. Whelan, Eds.
`
`tocthanol for l hour at room temperature, (iii) the
`18. A. B. Edmundson and K. R. Ely, in Synthetic
`N11t11n (Lon;lqn) 312, 643 (1984);
`M. J. Johnson, L. A. Herunbcrg, V. T. Oi, Prw;.
`tam.ide for 15 minutes at room temperature, (iv) the
`Nllll. Auut. Sei. U.S.A. 81, 6851 (1984).
`p. 107; E. D. Gett.off a
`(Wiley, New Yort, 1986),
`heavy and light chains were fractionated on a Du­
`td., Seiena 235, 1191 (1987).
`4. M. S. Neuberger a td., N11t11n (Lon;lon) 314, 268
`pont Zorbax G250 colwnn in SM guan.idinc hydro­
`(1985).
`19. A. R. Fcnht a td., NlltUre (Lon;lon) 314, 235
`and 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8.0.
`5. P. T. Jones, P. H. Dcac, J. Foote, M. S. Neuberger,
`The D 1.3 1< light chain was rcfractionated on high­
`chloride
`(1985).
`G. Winter, ibid. 321, 522 (1986).
`20. P. M. Colman a td., ibid. 326, 358 (1987).
`liquid chromatography (HPLC) and
`6. A.G. Amit, R. A. Mariuxza, S. E. V. Phillips, R. J.
`21. C. Chothia, A. M. Lcsk., G. G. Dodson, D. C.
`an aliquot was chcded on analytical HPLC to
`pcrformancc
`Seiena 233, 747 (1986).
`Hodgkin, ibill. 302, 500 (1983).
`Poljak,
`22. L. Hudson and F. C. Hay, Praawu Immunology
`en.sure no contamination with the D 1.3 heavy chain,
`7. M. E. Vcrhocycn, C. Berck, G. Winter, in prqwa­
`(v) appropriate heavy chains were mixed with equal
`Oxford, 1980), p. 240.
`amounts of D l . 3 K tight chain and dialy7.cd against
`(Blackwell,
`tion.
`23. We thank R. Poljak, A. Amit, S. Phillips, and R. A.
`8. P. Carter, H. Bcdoucllc, G. Winter, Nlldeie Aeids
`Ra. 13, 4431
`O.lM trisQ, pH 7.4, at 4°C for 2 days,
`Marriuzza for the crystallographic coordinates of
`rcasscrn bled antibody was purified on a protein A­
`(1985).
`and (vi)
`9. J. Ellison and L. Hood, J>rw;. Nllll.Aaut. &i. U.S.A.
`Dl.3 lysozymc
`
`complex; R. A. Marriuzza, J. Foote,
`79, 1984 (1982).
`C. Chothia, and A. Lcsk for discussions and com­
`eluted at pH 6, and the reshaped
`Scpha.rosc colwnn. The rcasscrn bled mouse anti­
`10. H. Potter, L. Weir, P. Leder, ibid. 81, 7161 (1984).
`ments on the paper; J. FOO!C for use of the Buorcs­
`at pH 4. From 1 mg of anti­
`cc:ncc titration method and associated computer
`body (MolgGl)
`11. V. T. Oi, S. L. Morrison, L.A. Hcncnbcrg, P.
`body, the yield of rcasscm bled antibody was Jess
`antibody (HulgG2)
`Berg, ibid. 80, 825 (1983).
`in advance
`12. Clones secreting antibody were grown in 1-liter
`programs
`
`of publication; and J. Jarvis, P.
`T. Jones, and R. Pannell
`than 20%.
`rollcr bottles, and antibody was purified on protein
`for technical assistance.
`M.V. is a senior rcscarch
`
`13. M. Harper, F. Lema, G. Boulot, R. J. Poljak, Mal.
`assistant of the Belgian
`1-no1. 24, 97 (1987).
`was exchanged
`National Fund for Scientific Research and a fcllow
`The mouse ).. light chain of antibodies
`A�a.rosc-
`14. E. A. Kabat, Aih. p,,,fein Chmr. 32, 1 (1978).
`secreted from the J558L myclonu
`for the D 1.3 K light chain in vitro. For the D l. 3
`of the Commission
`of the European Communities.
`J. Novotny, R. Bruccoleri, M. Karplus,
`15. C. Chothia,
`antibody and the two recombinant antibodies (i) 1
`J. Mol. Biol. 186, 651 (1985).
`
`29 September 1987; accepted 8 February 1988
`
`Peroxisomal Membrane Ghosts in Zellweger
`Syndrome-Aberrant Organelle Assembly
`M. J. SANTos, T. IMANAKA, H. SHIO, G. M. SMALL, P. B. l...AzAR.ow
`Pcroxisomcs are apparently missing in Zellwegcr syndrome; nevertheless, some of the
`integral membrane proteins of the organelle are prcscot. Their distribution was
`studied by immunoftuoresccncc microscopy. In control fibroblasts., pcroxisomcs
`appeared as small dots. In Zellwegcr fibroblasts., the pcroxisomal membrane proteins
`were located in unusual emp ty membrane structures of larger size. These results
`suggest that the primary defect in this di.scasc may be in the mcchan.ism for import of
`matrix proteins.
`ZELLWEGER SYNDROME IS A DISEASE
`in which an entire organelle, the
`peroxisome, appears to be missing,
`as first recognized by Goldfischer et ti/.. (1).
`The peroxisome is nearly ubiquitous in eu­
`karyotic cells and functions in fatty acid 13-
`oxidation, plasmalogen biosynthesis, cellular
`respiration (H20rfonning), gluconeogene­
`sis, bile acid synthesis, and purine catabo­
`lism (2). This human genetic disorder, char­
`acterized by profound neurological impair­
`ment, metabolic disrurbance, and neonatal
`death, has taught us much about peroxi­
`some function (3) and promises to teach us
`more about peroxisome assembly. Some
`peroxisomal proteins are synthesized nor­
`mally in Zellweger syndrome (4), but they
`are not assembled into peroxisomes. Many
`of these proteins are rapidly degraded, with
`the result that important soluble matrix en­
`zymes (catalyzing j3-oxidation) ( 4) and
`membrane-bound enzymes (catalyzing the
`initial steps in plasmalogen biosynthesis) ( 4,
`5) are missing or seriously deficient, thus
`The Rockcfcllcr University, New York, NY 10021.
`
`causing severe metabolic abnormalities (3).
`On the other hand, some peroxisomal en­
`zymes (for example, catalase) are present in
`normal amounts in Zellweger cells but are
`located free in the cytosol (4, 6, 7).
`These defects correlate with the known
`facts of peroxisome biogenesis. All peroxi­
`somal proteins investigated thus far are syn­
`thesized on free polyribosomes and are as­
`sembled posttranslationally into preexisting
`peroxisomes ( 8). If the organelle is missing
`(1), newly made proteins will just diffuse
`through the cytosol, unable to enter a per­
`oxisome. Under these circwnstances, it is
`not surprising that many are degraded.
`The autosomal recessive genetics of Zell­
`weger syndrome indicates that a single mu­
`tation is responsible for the defects. One
`explanation would be that the mutation
`prevents the assembly of the peroxisomal
`membrane. In this case peroxisomal integral
`membrane proteins (PxlMPs) (9) should be
`absent, since those that have been studied
`are made on free polyribosomes (10-12)
`and are unlikely to be stable if not integrated
`into a membrane. Two other possibilities
`
`were suggested by the unexpected finding
`that several PxIMPs are present in normal
`amounts in Zellweger liver (13). The peroxi­
`somal membranes could be assembled in
`Zellweger syndrome, but the import of ma­
`trix proteins is defective. 1bis would result
`in empty (or nearly empty) membrane
`ghosts, which would not be recogniz.able by
`electron microscopy or cytochemistry.
`Alternatively, the PxIMPs, in the absence of
`peroxisomes, might have violated the rules
`of protein sorting and inserted into the
`wrong intracellular membrane(s).
`To differentiate among these possibilities,
`we analyzed fibroblasts with a polyspecific
`antiserum against rat liver PxIMPs (polyspe­
`cific anti-PxIMPs) (12) (Fig. lA, lane 1).
`This serum detected three human PxIMPs
`with masses of approximately 140, 69, and
`53 kD in control cells (Fig. lA, lanes 2 to
`4). These PxIMPs were also present in Zell­
`weger fibroblasts (lane 5), and they coscdi­
`mented in equilibriwn density centrifuga­
`tion of Z.Cllweger fibroblast homogenates.
`However, the PxIMPs were found ac an
`abnormally low density of 1.10 g!cm3 (in­
`stead of the usual fibroblast peroxisome
`density of 1.17 g!cm3) [lanes 6 and 7; further
`details in (14)]- Several other cell mem­
`branes also sedimented in the low-density
`region of the gradient where the PxIMPs
`were found (14). Therefore, the fraction­
`ation data arc consistent with the possibility
`that the PxIM.Ps are present in aberrant
`peroxisomal membrane ghosts, but they do
`not exclude erroneous localization in lyso­
`somes, the endoplasmic reticulum, or some
`other low-density organelle. lmmW10f1uo­
`rescence studies were carried out to resolve
`this uncertainty.
`
`SCIENCE, VOL. 239
`
`3 of 3
`
`BI Exhibit 1068
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket