throbber
The Interleukin-2 Receptor: A Target for Monoclonal Antibody Treatment of
`
`
`Human T-Cell Lymphotrophic Virus I-Induced Adult T-Cell Leukemia
`
`By Thomas A. Wa ldmann, Jeffrey D. White, Carolyn K. Goldman, Lois Top, Angus Grant, Richard Bamford, Eric Roessler,
`
`Ivan D. Horak, Sara Zaknoen, Claude Kasten-Sportes, Richard England, Eva Horak. Bibhuti Mishra. Michael Dipre,
`
`Paula Hale, Thomas A. Fleisher, Richard P. Junghans, Elaine S. Jaffe, and David L. Nelson
`
`
`
`and complete tients), or complete (2 patients). with partial
`Adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) is a malignancy of mature lym­
`lasting from 9 weeks to more than 3 years as
`remissions
`
`phocytes caused by the retrovirus human T-cell lympho­
`
`trophic virus-I (HTLV-1). It is an aggressive leukemia with
`
`assessed by routine hematologic tests, immunofluores­
`rate of 50% within 5 months; no con­
`
`
`
`cence analysis, and molecular genetic analysis of T-cell re­
`an overall mortality
`
`
`ceptor gene rearrangements and of HTLV-1 proviral inte­
`
`
`ventional chemotherapy regimen appears successful in in­
`
`gration. Furthermore. remission was associated with a
`
`ducing long-term disease-free survival in ATL patients.
`return to normal serum calcium levels and an improvement
`
`
`However, ATL cells constitutively express high-affinity in­
`
`of liver function tests. Remission was also associated in
`
`
`ter1eukin-2 receptors (IL-2Rs) identified by the anti-Tac
`
`some cases with an amelioration of the profound immuno­
`
`
`monoclonal antibody, whereas normal resting cells do not.
`
`deficiency state that characterizes ATL. Thus the use of a
`
`To exploit this difference in receptor expression, we ad­
`(IV) to 19 patients with
`
`monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of IL-2
`
`ministered anti-Tac intravenously
`with its receptor expressed on ATL cells provides a rational
`ATL. In general the patients did not suffer untoward reac­
`tions. and in 1 8 of 1 9 cases did not have a reduction
`
`approach for treatment of this aggressive malignancy.
`in
`This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on
`normal formed elements of the blood. Seven patients devel­
`
`
`that were mixed (1 patient). (4 pa-
`its use.
`oped remissions
`partial
`THE HYBR100MA TECHNIQUE of Kohler and Mil­
`
`stein' rekindled interest in the use of antibodies tar­
`geted to cell surface antigens to treat cancer patients. Im­
`mune-receptor-directed therapy has been applied clinically
`to an array of human disorders. However, effective therapy
`using unmodified murine monoclonal antibodies has been
`elusive because these antibodies are not cytocidal against
`human cells and in most cases are not directed against a
`vital cell surface structure required for tumor cell prolifera­
`tion and survival.2 We readdressed this issue using the inter­
`
`leukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) as the target for immune inter­
`vention. The scientific basis for this approach using the
`IL-2R as a target for immunotherapy is that resting normal
`cells do not express the high-affinity IL-2R, whereas this
`receptor is expressed by a proportion of the abnormal cells
`in certain forms of lymphoid neoplasia, select autoimmune
`disorders, and in individuals rejecting allografts.>-7 The JL-
`2R consists of at least three IL-2-binding peptide chains, as
`follows: IL-2Ra, a 55-Kd peptide identified by the monoclo­
`nal antibody anti-Tac8•9; IL-2RP,
`a 75-Kd subunit10•11; and
`the recently discovered IL-2R-y, a 64-Kd protein.'2 Identifi­
`
`cation and characterization of the IL-2Ra subunit was facili­
`tated by our development of a monoclonal antibody, anti­
`Tac, that binds to IL-2Ra and prevents the interaction of
`IL-2 with this subunit.8 Resting T ceUs, B cells, and mono­
`cytes in the circulation do not display IL-2Ra. In contrast to
`this lack of IL-2Ra expression in normal resting mononu­
`clear cells, this receptor subunit is expressed by a proportion
`of the abnormal cells in certain forms of neoplasia including
`certain T-cell, B-cell, monocytic, and even granulocytic leu­
`kemias. Furthermore, the serum concentration of the solu­
`ble fonn of lL-2Ra released by the abnormal cells is in­
`creased in patients with these disorders.13 Specifically, a
`proportion of the leukemic cells of patients with chronic or
`acute myelogenous leukemia express IL-2Ra identified by
`the anti-Tac monoclonal antibody.14 Furthermore, malig­
`nant B cells of virtually all patients with hairy celJ leukemia
`and a proportion of patients with large- and mixed-cell dif­
`fuse lymphomas express IL-2Ra. •s The IL-2Ra is also ex­
`pressed on Reed-Sternberg cells of patients with Hodgkin's
`
`disease and on malignant cells of patients with true histiocy­
`tic lymphoma.16 Similarly, a proportion of patients with
`cutaneous T-ceU lymphomas express the Tac peptide on
`their malignant cells. Finally, virtually all patients with hu­
`man T-cell lymphotrophic virus-I (HTLV-I)-associated
`adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) constitutively express very
`large numbers of IL-2Ra.11-19
`These results suggested that anti-IL-2R antibodies might
`be effective agents for the treatment of certain neoplastic
`diseases. We have focused our therapeutic studies of malig­
`nancy on the disordered IL-2 R expression of a distinct form
`of T-cell leukemia, ATL.19 A TL is an aggressive malignancy
`of lymphocytes displaying a multilobulated nucleus with
`dense chromatin and expressing a CD3+, CD4+, co&-,
`Tac+) phenotype.17•18 The dis­
`COr, and CD25+ (lL-2Ra,
`ease exhibits a striking clustering of cases in certain geo­
`graphic regions, notably southwestern Japan, the Caribbean
`basin, northeastern South America, Central America, sub­
`Saharan Africa, and to a lesser extent the southeastern
`United States. The retrovirus HTLV-I is clearly associated
`with this disease and appears to play a major role in its
`pathogenesis.20 Patients with ATL have serum antibodies to
`HTLY-1 and the monoclonal integration of this retrovirus
`in their circulating malignant cells. Frank ATL generally
`has its onset in adulthood, 20 to 30 years following initial
`
`From the Metabolism Branch and Laboratory of Pathology, Na­
`tional Cancer lnstitwe. and the Clinical Pathology Department,
`Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, Naiional Institutes of
`Health, Bethesda, MD.
`Submitted March 17, 1993: accepted May 27, 1993.
`Address reprint requests to Thomas A. Waldmann, MD, Metabo­
`lism Branch, Naiional Cancer Institute, Bldg JO, Rm 4Nl 15, Be­
`thesda, MD 20892.
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
`charge payment. This article mus1 therefore be hereby marked
`"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734 solely to
`indicate this fact.
`This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use.
`0006-4971/93/8206-0032$0.00/0
`
`Blood. Vol 82, No 6 (September 15), 1993: pp 1701-1712
`
`1701
`
`1 of 13
`
`BI Exhibit 1036
`
`

`

`1702
`
`WALDMANN ET AL
`
`infection with HTL V-1. Principal clinical features include
`
`
`
`
`first week of therapy, followed by 40 mg on two occasions during
`moderate lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, and
`the second week. For the subsequent I 0 patients, to achieve rapid
`saturation of the IL-2R, the basic plan involved IV administration
`skin, central nervous system, and pulmonary involve­
`of 50 mg anti-Tac on two occasions for each of the first 2 weeks of
`
`ment21·22; the occurrence of hypercalcemia is characteristic
`with acute ATL manifest a striking degree
`therapy. Dosing schedules were modified slightly in some patients,
`of ATL. Patients
`and additional 20- or 50-mg doses were administered during subse­
`of immunosuppression and develop opportunistic infec­
`quent weeks to maintain the saturation of the IL-2R with the anti­
`tions such as Pneumocystis pneumonia and cryptococcal
`Tac monoclonal antibody. Furthermore, in such cases sufficient
`of several clinical
`meningitis. The experiences
`oncology
`anti-Tac was administered to yield measurable levels of circulating
`groups using combination chemotherapy regimens in pa­
`antibody in the serum of the patient. As noted above, patients with
`
`tients with this disease have been disappointing. In most
`malignant cells in the central nervous system received intrathecal
`is approximately
`
`chemotherapy series, overall mortality
`methotrexate.
`50% within 5 months. No conventional treatment progrdm
`The criteria for response were as follows: ( 1) complete response,
`disappearance of all measurable and assessable disease lasting more
`
`
`appears successful in inducing long-term disease-free sur­
`vival in A TL patients.
`than I month; (2) partial response, a 50% reduction of leukemic cell
`In our clinical trial, we wished to exploit the observation
`count and a 50% reduction in the size of measurable lesions and no
`increase in the size of any measurable or assessable lesion or appear­
`that the normal resting cells of patients with A TL do not
`ance of a new lesion for I month; (3) mixed response, identical to
`display IL-2Ra, whereas the malignant T cells display
`partial response with the exception that there is the appearance of a
`I 0,000 to 35,000 IL-2Ra/cell that are identified by the anti­
`
`Tac monoclonal antibody.17•18 Thus IL-2R-directed
`new lesion within I month in a tissue other than that involved
`immu­
`initially; (4) stable disease, less than partial response with no new
`notherapy using anti-Tac could theoretically eliminate
`IL-
`lesions or less than a 25% increase in any measurable lesion; (5)
`
`2Ra-expressing leukemic cells while retaining the
`progressive disease, at least 25% increase in leukemic cell count or
`Tac-nonexpressing normal T cells and their precursors
`that
`an increase of 25% or greater in any measurable lesion. A systems­
`
`express the antigen receptors required for normal T-cell­
`oriented microcomputer-based patient data management system
`
`mediated immune responses. In our preliminary studies, we
`was devised and implemented in which historical, clinical, and labo­
`
`
`observed that anti-Tac induced a remission in some patients
`ratory data were stored and manipulated for analysis (R.P.J. and
`toxicity.19 In the present
`with ATL without associated
`T.A.W.).
`
`
`had study, the 19 patients with A TL treated with anti-Tac
`Approval was obtained from the institutional review board for
`these studies. Informed consent was provided according to the Dec­
`
`few untoward reactions related to the immunotherapy and
`laration of Helsinki.
`in general d.id not have a reduction in normal formed ele­
`Produc1ion of anti-Tac monoclonal antibodies. The anti-Tac
`ments of the blood. Seven of 19 treated patients had a tran­
`monoclonal antibody was produced as described previously19 by
`sient mixed (I), partial ( 4 ), or complete (2) remission,
`with
`fusion of NS-1 mouse myeloma cells with spleen cells of mice that
`
`partial and complete remissions lasting from 2 to more than
`had been immunized with a cell line derived from an ATL patient.
`36 months.
`The antibody does not function in complement-dependent cytotox­
`icity with human plasma nor does it induce antibody-dependent
`cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) with human mononuclear cells. How­
`ever, anti-Tac blocks the interaction of lL-2 with the high-affinity
`receptors for this lymphokine. Large quantities of the monoclonal
`antibody were produced by inoculating hybridoma cells into the
`peritoneal cavity of BALB/c mice and then purifying the mouse
`lgG2a anti-Tac from the resulting ascites fluid by diethylamino­
`ethyl cellulose chromatography. The purified antibody was dia­
`lyzed against saline, centrifuged, filtered, precipitated with 20% so­
`dium sulfate, and finally diluted in saline at pH 7.4 to a
`concentration of 2 mg/ml. Each lot of the product was assayed by
`immunoelectrophoresis in agar plates using antisera to lgG2a,
`lgG1, and lgM, as well as polyvalent antibodies to most mouse
`proteins. Lots greater than 98% pure as assessed by these analyses
`and by high-performance liquid chromatography and sodium do­
`decyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis were used. The
`monoclonal antibody preparntion was sterilized by passage through
`a 0.22-µm membrane filter (Millipore, Marlborough, MA) by the
`Pharmaceutical Development Section of the Clinical Center of the
`National Institutes of Health (NIH) and was shown to be nonpyro­
`genic and sterile by the Bureau of Biologics.
`lmmunojluorescence analysis of cell surface phenotype. The
`phenotype of the leukemic cell population was defined by indirect
`and direct immunofluorescence performed with mouse monoclo­
`nal antibodies using a fluorescence-activated cell-sorter as de­
`scribed previously.19 Two antibodies (anti-Tac and 7G7/B6) that
`are directed toward different epitopes of!L-2Ra were used to define
`the expression of this receptor subunit. Other monoclonal antibod­
`ies used include antibodies reacting with HLA-DR (la-I; Ortho,
`
`Patient population. Nineteen patients with histologically con­
`firmed HTLV-1-associated ATL were studied (Table I). Each of the
`patients manifested the following features: (I) a histologically con­
`firmed diagnosis of leukemia or lymphoma of mature T cells with
`polymorphic indented or lobulated nuclei; (2) intense expression of
`the Tac antigen (IL-2Ra) on at least 10% of the patient's pe.ripheral
`blood, lymph node, or dermal T cells; (3) antibodies to HTL V-1
`demonstrable in the serum; and (4) omission of cytotoxic chemo­
`therapy and radiation therapy for at least 3 weeks before entry into
`the trial. Patients with or without previous chemotherapy were eligi­
`ble for inclusion in this study; I 0 patients had failed to respond to
`prior therapy. Patients with symptomatic central nervous system
`disease were excluded; however, patients with malignant cells de­
`monstrable in the cerebrospinal fluid were included and received
`intrathecal methotrexate. The patients ranged in age from 24 to 62
`years (mean, 41 years); demographic factors in the patient group are
`shown in Table I. Ten patients were male and nine female, 17 were
`black, one was Hispanic, and one was of Japanese origin, and lO
`were from the United States, four were from Jamaica, and one each
`was from Japan, Cuba, Trinidad, Haiti, and Guyana. Using the
`criteria of Kawano et al23 and Yamaguchi et al,24 11 patients with
`A TL were in the acute or crisis stage, four manifested A TL lym­
`phoma, and four had chronic A TL.
`Therapelllic swdy plan. Anti-Tac was administered intrave­
`nously (IV) over a 2-hour period in 100 ml normal saline contain­
`ing 5% albumin. In the basic study plan for the initial nine patients,
`20 mg anti-Tac was administered JV on two occasions during the
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`2 of 13
`
`BI Exhibit 1036
`
`

`

`ANTl-T AC THERAPY OF A TL
`
`Table 1. Demographic and Clinical Features of A TL Patients
`
`Patient
`No.
`
`Type of
`ATL
`
`Age/Sex/Race
`
`sll-2R (U/ml)
`
`WBC/µl
`
`Circulating
`ll-2R/Tac-
`E>cpressing
`Lymphocytes/µl
`
`Antibodies
`to HTLV�
`
`Serum
`Ca
`
`Acute
`Chronic
`Lymphoma
`Acute
`
`147,130
`2,240
`4,660
`2,200
`230,370
`87.710
`56,420
`920
`60.170
`6.060
`31,700
`2,040
`89,830
`31.580
`48.460
`9.910
`2,210
`158, 130
`138,680
`
`42.600
`3.BOO
`1,500
`20.700
`41,500
`12,700
`75.400
`5.500
`102.800
`15.400
`21,300
`9, 100
`7,900
`32,100
`26.500
`7.100
`13,200
`177,000
`21,600
`
`11.200
`2.120
`<100
`12.930
`24.200
`1,600
`37.720
`230
`50.600
`1,900
`13,500
`3,000
`1,800
`12.700
`8,010
`<100
`4,710
`152,900
`4.600
`
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`+
`
`3.50
`3.75
`2.15
`2.35
`B.10
`4.35
`4.60
`2.30
`4.40
`4.10
`2.65
`2.40
`2.20
`3.90
`2.80
`2.45
`2.20
`3.80
`3.60
`
`1703
`
`Abnormal
`Uver
`Func;tion
`Tests
`
`+
`+
`+
`
`+
`+
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`+
`
`Acute
`
`Acute
`
`Acute
`Lymphoma
`Acute
`Acute
`
`Chronic
`
`Chronic
`Lymphoma
`Acute
`
`39/F/B
`1
`28/M/B
`2
`25/M/B
`3
`4
`32/F/B
`62/M/B
`5
`6
`44/M/B
`7
`41/M/B
`57/F/A
`8
`9
`42/M/H
`10
`58/F/6
`11
`40/M/B
`12
`55/M/B
`53/M/B
`13
`24/F/B
`14
`15
`42/F/6
`Acute
`Lymphoma
`34/M/B
`16
`17
`Chronic
`41/F/6
`Acute
`18
`26/F/6
`19
`60/F/6
`Acute
`Abbreviations: 6, black; H, Hispanic; A. Asian.
`
`Raritan, NJ); human T-cell-associated antigens (CD2, CDJ, CD4,
`CD5, and CDS; Ortho and Becton-Dickinson, Mountain View,
`CA); CD7 (3A I; a gift from Dr Barton Haynes); and CD45 and
`CD29 (Coulter Immunology, Hialeah, FL). The fluorescein isothio­
`cyanate (FITC) antimouse IgG reagent was obtained from Coulter
`Immunology. Histograms for each cell type were integrated to de­
`termine the percentage of mononuclear cells that reacted with indi­
`vidual monoclonal antibodies. The absolute number of cells in the
`circulation per cubic millimeter expressing a particular antigen was
`determined from the product of (I) circulating white blood cell
`(WBC) count per cubic millimeter, (2) the proportion of these cir­
`culating WBCs that were mononuclear cells as determined by rou­
`tine hematologic analysis, and (3) the proportion of these mononu­
`clear cells that expressed the antigen under study as assessed by
`immunocytofluorography.
`Molecular genetic analysis of Tcr gene rearrangement and
`HTLV-1 integration. Analysis for clonal Tcr gene rearrangements
`and for HTLV-1 integration were performed as described previ­
`ously.25·26 High-molecular-weight DNA was extracted from frozen
`cell suspensions containing approximately I08 cells. DNA samples
`were digested with the restriction enzymes BamHI, EcoRI, Hindtll,
`or Pstl (International Biotechnologies, New Haven, CT, and New
`England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) and were size-fractionated on 0.5%
`to 0.9% agarose gels. They were transferred by the Southern blot
`technique to reinforced nitrocellulose paper (Schleicher and Schull,
`Keene, NH). Hybridization to randomly primed 32P-labeled DNA
`probes of the constant regions of the Tcr (3 gene and the HTLV -I
`gene were performed, followed by washing at appropriate strin­
`gency and radioautography. Nonlymphoid control DNA was ana­
`lyzed simultaneously to identify germ line positions of the Tcr genes
`examined. The Tcr f3 gene probe used was a 700-bp Eco RI fragment
`containing the mouse or human C{J region that recognizes both
`human C{J regions. The HTLV-1 probe used was the 9-kb Sacl
`fragment containing the entire viral genome with the exception of
`the long terminal repeats (a gift from Dr Flossie Wong-Staal).
`Assay for antibodies to HTLV-1. The sera of ATL patients were
`analyzed for antibodies to disrupted and inactivated HTL Y-1 using
`an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ([ELISA] Cellular Prod­
`ucts, Buffalo, NY).
`
`Assay for mouse lg. Murine IgG2a anti-Tac levels in the sera of
`patients were assayed with an ELISA technique using affinity-puri­
`fied goat antimouse immunoglobulin absorbed onto polyvinyl
`plates at JOO ng/well and washed.i9 Bound murine anti-Tac was
`detected with a goat antimouse immunoglobulin conjugated with
`alkaline phosphatase (Sigma, St Louis, MO) and compared with a
`standard curve of anti-Tac antibody.
`Assay for human anti mouse anti-Tac antibody. The serum used
`in all assays was separated from peripheral blood and stored at
`-20°C until used. For detection of human antimouse antibodies
`(HAMA), the technique described by Schroff et al27 was used, with
`the exception that anti-Tac was used in lieu of the T 101 antibody.
`Serum antiglobulin levels for a given patient were considered mean­
`ingfully increased when the antiglobulin level after therapy was
`greater than twice that in the sample obtained before administra­
`tion of the mouse monoclonal antibody.
`
`RESULTS
`Patient characteristics. Nineteen patients with histologi­
`cally confirmed HTLV-1-associated ATL were treated with
`IV administered anti-Tac (Table I). Four patients had lym­
`phoma-type A TL without circulating malignant cells; the
`peripheral blood WBC count in the remaining 15 patients
`before therapy ranged from 3,800 to 177,000/ 1-'L (geometric
`mean, 26,000). Patients with A TL had pretherapy serum
`soluble IL-2R (s1L-2Ra) levels of 920 to 230,370 U/mL
`(mean, 55,744), whereas the upper limit of the normal is
`502 U /mL (mean, 238). 28 T-Cell leukemic populations were
`confirmed to be monoclonal by molecular genetic analysis
`of the rearrangement of genes encoding the Tcr f3 chain.
`Southern blot analysis of the Tcr f3 receptor gene rearrange­
`ment using a radiolabeled probe that hybridizes with the
`constant region of the Tcr f3 chain showed a band that was
`not present in gennline tissues, a hallmark of a clonally
`expanded population of T lymphocytes (Fig 1). Further­
`more, Southern blot analysis of HTL V-1 proviral in tegra-
`
`3 of 13
`
`BI Exhibit 1036
`
`

`

`1704
`
`WALDMANN ET AL
`
`lion in Pst I and EcoRI digests of DNA obtained from the
`patients defined the clonal integration of HTL Y-1 provi­
`ruses. Clinically, nine patients manifested involvement of
`the skin. Twelve were hypercalcemic, with a serum calcium
`level in these cases ranging from 2.65 to 8.1 mmol/L (nor­
`mal range. 2.05 to 2.5 mmol/L). Mild to moderate liver
`function abnormalities were demonstrable in 12 of 19 cases.
`Using flow cytometric phenotypic analyses of circulating
`mononuclear cells, we demonstrated that in 13 of 15 cases
`with leukemia. the predominant mononuclear cell popula­
`tion expressed the CD3+, CD4+/CD8-. CD25+ phenotype;
`phenotypes in the two remaining cases were CD3+. co4-;
`co&-, co25+ and cor, co4+;co&-, co25+. Circulating
`mononuclear cells of the patients showed intense expression
`of the Tac antigen on a relatively homogeneous cell popula­
`tion manifesting high fluorescence intensity (Fig 2). It ap­
`pears that all of the circulating malignant cells expressed the
`Tac antigen. Although a small proportion of normal periph­
`eral blood mononuclear cells manifest low-level Tac expres­
`sion, the pattern observed within the leukemic population is
`quite distinct from that observed in normal individuals in
`terms of the homogeneity and intensity of Tac antigen ex-
`
`pression (Fig 2). In the 15 leukemic cases, the abnormal cell
`population did not react with a CD? (3A 1) monoclonal an­
`tibody, which reacts with normal T-cell precursors and with
`at least 70% of normal mature T lymphocytes.
`Response of ATL patients ro treatment with anti-Tac
`monoclonal antibodies. The initial basic protocol for anti­
`Tac therapy involved the administration o f 2 0 mg anti-Tac
`on two occasions during the first week and 40 mg anti-Tac
`on two occasions during the second week of therapy for
`each patient (Table 2). After the second week of therapy,
`additional doses of20 or 50 mg anti-Tac were administered
`to patients who had made an initial clinical response to
`anti-Tac therapy. It was noted that from 40 lo 100 mg anti­
`Tac had to be administered to the patients to saturate the
`IL-2Ra expressed by tumor cells. The IL-2Rs on leukemic
`cells were deemed to be saturated by the infused monoclo­
`nal antibody when the cells manifested the following three
`features: (I) reaction with FJTC anti mouse IgG; (2) reaction
`with FJTC-labeled 7G7 /86 (an antibody that reacts with
`1L-2Ra but does not cross-block with anti-Tac); and (3) no
`binding in direct immunofluorescence analysis with FITC­
`labeled anti-Tac, since the target antigen was blocked by in
`
`Placental
`(germline)
`
`Patient
`23 days post
`treatment
`
`11 Kb -
`
`8.5 Kb•
`
`4 Kb -
`
`8.8 Kb-
`7.1 Kb -
`
`Patient
`1099 days post
`treatment
`
`_...,_
`
`EcoRI
`
`--����-11 Kb�����•
`BamHI EcoRI
`EcoRI
`
`t �
`9J [1J I
`
`V(Jn D(J1
`
`111111
`J(J1
`
`t
`*
`�
`111111 !?di
`C(J1
`flJ-- C(J PROBE -ti!
`
`--4Kb-
`EcoRI
`EcoRI BamHI
`
`t t
`
`1---1
`1 Kb
`
`Fig 1. Analysis of Tcr fJ gene rearrangements to monitor anti-Tac monoclonal antibody treatment in patient no. 5 with ATL using a Tcr fJ
`constant region probe (CP). The Tcr fJ constant region genes are on four and 11-Kb EcoRI fragments in placental (germlinet DNA as indicated
`(---).The 11-Kb band contains C{J1. whereas C{J2 is present in the 4-Kb band. "An artifactual band at 8.5 Kb that is a result of an incomplete
`digestion at a site 5' of the C{J2 locus. Digests of patient peripheral blood DNA during an active phase of the disease 23 days after initiation of
`therapy yielded a diminished 11-Kb band as well as two nongermline bands I+ that reflect a monoclonal Tcr fJ pattern of gene rearrange­
`ment. This pattern indicates that both alleles for Tcr fJ in the leukemic clone rearranged into C{J1. Patient DNA obtained in remission 1.099
`days following initiation of therapy did not express the two nongermline bands. thus confirming elimination of the circulating monoclonal
`population. In the schematic diagram of the germline arrangement of the Tcr fJ chain gene, we indicate the locations of the BamHI and EcoRI
`restriction endonuclease sites as well as the C{J regions recognized by the cDNA probe.
`
`4 of 13
`
`BI Exhibit 1036
`
`

`

`ANTI-TAC THERAPY OF ATL
`
`1705
`
`A
`Pre therapy
`·100.....--------------..
`
`- Control
`-��- Anti Tac
`
`Post Therapy
`
`- Control
`-� .. -- Anti Tac
`
`'
`.
`'
`
`I ,,
`'
`l
`f
`
`� ·�
`'\
`\ \
`102
`101
`103
`Relative Fluorescence Intensity
`
`104
`
`104
`
`..... �
`E :::::> 50
`z
`Q)
`(_)
`
`B
`100
`
`..... Q) .0
`E :J 50
`z
`Q)
`(_)
`
`0
`100
`
`c
`
`� E
`� 50
`� ()
`
`Normal Cells
`
`-Control
`-Anti Tac
`
`101
`Relative Fluorescence Intensity
`
`vivo administration of this antibody. In light of these early
`observations, to achieve a rapid saturation of IL-2R, the
`basic dosing schedule was altered for the final 10 patients in
`the group so that 50 mg anti-Tac per patient was adminis­
`tered on two occasions during the first week of therapy and
`on two occasions during the second week of therapy. Addi­
`tional doses of 50 mg anti-Tac to maintain receptor satura­
`tion were administered to patients who made an initial par­
`tial or complete response to therapy. The 19 patients
`received a total of23 distinct courses of therapy; there were
`three to 11 infusions per treatment course (mean, five).
`Treatment courses ranged from 3 to 57 days (mean, 17),
`with a total dose of antibody per treatment course ranging
`from 60 to 500 mg (mean, 22 5). Maximum levels of mouse
`antibody achieved in the serum 24 hours after the last thera­
`peutic dose of a treatment course ranged from 595 to 12 ,230
`ng/mL.
`Toxicity. The 19 patients officially entered into the clin­
`ical trial did not have any untoward acute reactions. How­
`ever, an untoward event that may represent a reaction was
`observed in one patient with A TL who was treated with
`anti-Tac off-study under a compassionate protocol exemp­
`tion. This patient, who was ill on admission with heart fail­
`ure, hepatosplenomegaly, and multiple effusions, died of
`respiratory distress following the fifth infusion of anti-Tac;
`at autopsy, the cause of death was shown to be massive
`hemorrhagic consolidation of the lungs. One patient devel­
`oped hives after the second of four anti-Tac infusions. Two
`patients developed fever to a maximum of39. l °C following
`anti-Tac administration. Five patients in six treatment
`courses manifested an increase in plasma uric acid levels
`without sequelae; however, the patients were experiencing
`progressive disease during five of these treatment periods. In
`general, patients did not manifest hematologic toxicity af­
`fecting the normal formed elements of the blood including
`platelets or polymorphonuclear leukocytes. In the one ex­
`ception to this generalization, a patient developed a hemo­
`lytic anemia and a reduction in the platelet count to 26,000/
`µ.Land in the neutrophil count to 380/µL. This patient had
`leukemic involvement of the bone marrow; he received sub­
`sequent doses of anti-Tac without any further untoward re­
`action noted.
`Tumor response-clinical response. Twelve of the 19
`patients had either a transient response ( <2 weeks) or no
`response to anti-Tac therapy; two of these patients had
`stable disease, whereas the disease progressed in the remain-
`
`Fig 2. Relative fluorescence intensity of Tac antigen expression
`was defined by indirect immunofluorescence on the peripheral
`blood mononuclear cells from (A} patient no. 5 with A TL before
`therapy; (B) the same patient in remission following completion of
`anti-Tac therapy; and (C) a nonnal individual. Circulating mononu­
`clear cells of the patient showed intense expression of the Tac anti­
`gen on a relatively homogeneoU11 cell population manifesting high
`fluorescence intensity before therapy. Following therapy, a small
`proportion of peripheral blood mononuclear cells of the patient
`manifested low-level Tac expression. This pattern is quite distinct
`from that observed during relapse and is comparable to that noted
`in the normal individual in terms of homogeneity and intensity of
`Tac antigen expression.
`
`5 of 13
`
`BI Exhibit 1036
`
`

`

`1706
`
`Patient
`No.
`
`2
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`14
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`19
`
`Table 2. Effect of Anti-Tac Therapy
`
`WALDMANN ET AL
`
`Previous Therapy
`
`None
`ProMACE/MOPP
`
`None
`CHOP
`None
`DCF
`None
`MACOP·B
`Pulse steroids
`Cytoxan. etoposide,
`doxorubicin, MTX
`None
`
`Vincristine, bleomycin,
`cytoxan, decadron
`None
`None
`ProMACE/MOPP. COP
`+ MOPP
`None
`
`Bleomycin, cytoxan,
`doxorubicin
`ProMACE/MOPP
`None
`
`Dose of Anti·Tac
`Administered {mg)
`
`150
`1st course, 160
`2nd course, 60
`300
`200
`400
`180
`147
`250
`120
`100
`
`1st course, 490
`2nd course, 500
`300
`
`200
`200
`180
`
`1st course. 200
`2nd course. 200
`
`1st course. 300
`2nd course, 200
`220
`220
`
`Toxicity
`
`None
`None
`
`None
`None
`None
`Fever (39. 1 °C)
`Fever (38°C)
`None
`None
`None
`
`None
`
`None
`
`Hives
`None
`None
`
`Transient neutropenia
`Thrombocytopenia,
`hemolytic anemia
`None
`
`None
`None
`
`Oevelopment of
`Anti-Tac
`Antibodies
`(HAMAI
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`
`Clinical Response/
`Duration (dJ
`
`PD
`PR 224
`PR 70
`PR 63
`PD
`CR> 1.098
`PD
`PD
`PD
`PD
`PD
`
`CR 357
`PD
`SD
`
`SD
`PD
`MR13
`
`PR 252
`PD
`
`PR 168
`SD
`PD
`PD
`
`Abbreviations: ProMACE, prednisone. methotrexate. doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide. etoposide; MOPP. mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarba­
`zine. prednisone; CHOP. cyclohosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine. prednisone; DCF. pentostatin; MACOP-B, methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophos­
`phamide. vincristine. prednisone. bleomycin; MTX, methotrxate; COP, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone; CR. complete remission; PR, partial
`response; SD, stable disease; PD. progressive disease; MR, mixed response.
`
`ing 10. The seven remaining patients had a more favorable
`response to therapy. One of these patients manifested a
`transient mixed response characterized by a decrease of the
`circulating Tac-expressing cells from 9,300/µL to less than
`200/µL (normal individuals have �500 circulating T cells/
`µL that express Tac weakly). This patient was deemed to
`have a transient mixed, rather than a partial, remission,
`because 1- to 2-cm enlarged lymph nodes shown on biopsy
`to be effaced by malignant T cells appeared in the neck 13
`days after initiation of anti-Tac therapy. Four additional
`patients, including two with chronic ATL and two with
`lymphoma-type ATL, developed a partial remission; the du­
`ration of these partial remissions ranged from 63 to 252
`days (mean, 177). The three patients of this group that had a
`partial remission lasting from 168 to 252 days were re­
`treated with anti-Tac when their disease relapsed. Two of
`these patients did not respond to retreatment, although
`their leukemic cells continued to express the Tac antigen.
`The third patient had a second partial remission lasting 70
`days following re-treatment, but then relapsed. Two addi­
`tional patients, one with chronic A TL and one with acute
`ATL, developed a complete remission, which lasted for 357
`days in the patient with chronic ATL (Fig 3B). The patient
`with acute ATL is still in a complete remission more than 3
`years following entry into remission (Fig 3A). This patient
`
`initially had hepatosplenomegaly and a peripheral blood
`WBC count of 41,800/ µL that included 23,000 circulating
`Tac-expressing malignant T ce!Js/µL as assessed by immu­
`nofluorescence analysis. The soluble IL-2Ra level was
`230,370 U/mL, the highest level observed in this series of
`ATL patients, and the serum calcium level was 8.10 mmol/
`L before therapy, more than three times the upper limit of
`normal. The patient received 400 mg anti-Tac over a 7-
`week period; by 50 days following initiation of therapy, the
`patient had undergone a complete remission. Abnormal
`cells were no longer demonstrable in the circulation. Fur­
`thermore, the serum calcium level returned to normal (Fig
`4). Before anti-Tac therapy, the patient was anergic; how­
`ever, when reassessed 2 months and again I year postther­
`apy during a complete remission, the patient manifested
`positive skin test responses to recall antigens. The patient
`developed HAMA 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket