throbber
Leukemia (2006) 20, 2093–2101
`& 2006 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0887-6924/06 $30.00
`
`www.nature.com/leu
`
`ORIGINAL ARTICLE
`
`Cytotoxic activity of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg) in acute myeloid leukemia
`correlates with the expression of protein kinase Syk
`
`L Balaian and ED Ball
`
`Blood and Marrow Transplantation Division, Department of Medicine and Moores UCSD Cancer Center, University of California,
`San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
`
`Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells express the cell surface
`antigen CD33 that, upon ligation with a monoclonal antibody
`(mAb), is a downregulator of cell growth in a Syk-dependent
`manner. An anti-CD33 mAb coupled to a toxin, gemtuzumab
`ozogamicin (GO), is used for the treatment of AML (Mylotarg).
`Therefore, we investigated whether the response of AML cells
`to GO treatment also depends on Syk expression. Forty primary
`AML samples (25 Syk-positive and 15 Syk-negative) were tested
`for their response to the anti-proliferative effects of GO and
`unmodified anti-CD33 mAb. A correlation between Syk expres-
`sion and the response of leukemia cells to GO and anti-CD33
`mAb was found. ‘Blocking’ of Syk by small interfering RNA
`resulted in unresponsiveness of AML cells to both GO and anti-
`CD33 mAb-mediated cytotoxicity. Syk upregulation by the de-
`methylating agent 5-azacytidine (5-aza) induced re-expression
`of Syk in some cases, resulting in enhanced GO and anti-CD33-
`mediated inhibition of leukemia cell growth. Thus, the cytotoxi-
`city of both GO and anti-CD33 in primary AML samples was asso-
`ciated with Syk expression. 5-Aza restored Syk and increased
`the sensitivity of originally Syk-negative, non-responsive cells
`to CD33 ligation to levels of Syk-positive cells. These data
`have clinical significance for predicting response to GO and
`designing clinical trials.
`Leukemia (2006) 20, 2093–2101. doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2404437;
`published online 19 October 2006
`Keywords: myeloid leukemia; Syk; anti-CD33 mAb; gemtuzumab
`ozogamicin; 5-azacytidine.
`
`Introduction
`
`CD33 is a cell surface glycoprotein specifically expressed on
`myeloid cells including myeloid leukemia cells.1 Monoclonal
`antibodies (mAbs) against CD33 have been used in the diagnosis
`and therapy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for many years.2
`CD33, a member of the siglec family, is engaged in sialic acid-
`dependent cell interactions and adhesion of myeloid cells.3 The
`cytoplasmic tail of CD33 contains two immune tyrosine-based
`inhibitory motifs (ITIMs) and therefore, may serve as a potential
`inhibitory receptor.4–6 Engagement of CD33 induced apoptosis
`and inhibition of proliferation in leukemia cells from AML and
`chronic myeloid leukemia patients.7–10 However, little is known
`about the molecular mechanisms of the CD33 signaling events
`leading to inhibition of cell growth and apoptosis.
`The toxin (calicheamycin)-conjugated anti-CD33 mAb gem-
`tuzumab ozogamicin (GO)
`is now established as a useful
`
`Correspondence: Dr ED Ball, Blood and Marrow Transplantation
`Division, Department of Medicine and Moores UCSD Cancer Center,
`University of California, San Diego, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, La
`Jolla, CA 92093-0960, USA.
`E-mail: tball@ucsd.edu
`Received 25 April 2006; revised 11 August 2006; accepted 23 August
`2006; published online 19 October 2006
`
`component in the therapy of AML.11 GO induces remissions in
`about 30% of patients with relapsed AML. GO, a humanized
`immunoglobulin G (IgG) 4 mAb, contains human sequences
`whereas the complementarity-determining regions are derived
`from a murine antibody that binds CD33. The antibody is linked
`to N-acetyl-gamma calicheamycin via a bifunctional linker and
`is 50% loaded with 4–6 mol of calicheamycin per mole of
`antibody. Notably, the remaining 50% of the antibody is not
`linked to calicheamycin. Therefore, we examined whether the
`effects of GO depend on CD33-coupled molecules such as Syk.
`As GO is effective in only a minority of patients, the signaling
`activity of CD33 may be relevant to the responses achieved, in
`addition to the effect of the toxin calicheamycin.
`The protein kinase Syk is an essential element in many antigen
`receptor (B-cell receptor, T-cell receptor, Fc receptors) down-
`stream signaling cascades, resulting in cell responses such as
`adhesion, phagocytosis, proliferation and differentiation.12–17
`During early stages of antigen ligation, Syk binds to the recep-
`tor, becomes activated and phosphorylated and then phosphory-
`lates
`specific substrates
`such as phospholipase C-gamma
`with consecutive calcium influx.18 Late signaling events such
`as
`the activation of
`transcriptional
`factor nuclear
`factor-
`kappa B couple Syk activation with cell proliferation and
`differentiation.19
`in proximal signaling
`In myeloid cells, Syk involvement
`mediated by activated Fc receptor family members containing
`the tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) is well documen-
`ted.19–23 However, recent discoveries revealed that Syk is also
`involved in signaling of the ITIM-bearing CD22 receptor in B
`cells.24–27 We extended these findings by demonstrating that
`Syk (or ZAP-70) play an important role in CD33 signaling.28,29
`Upon CD33 ligation, Syk becomes phosphorylated and creates
`complexes with phosphorylated forms of the CD33 molecule
`itself and protein phosphatase Src homology phosphatase-1
`(SHP-1). Moreover, we showed that
`the anti-proliferative
`response of AML cells to CD33 ligation correlates with the
`level of Syk expression. Thirty percent of primary AML samples
`demonstrate no detectable Syk expression. Significantly greater
`numbers of Syk/Zap-70-positive samples respond to anti-CD33
`mAb treatment.29
`Recent discoveries established Syk as a tumor suppressor and
`linked deficient Syk expression to a variety of human
`hematopoietic30–33 and solid tumors.33–35 In breast cancer,
`Syk kinase is a potent modulator of malignant growth and a
`potential
`tumor suppressor, presumably by controlling cell
`division.33 Moreover,
`it was demonstrated that
`loss of Syk
`expression in breast cancer and T-cell acute lymphoblastic
`leukemia cells occurs at the transcriptional level, and is a result
`of DNA hypermethylation.31,36,37 Treatment of these cells with
`5-azacytidine (5-aza), a methylation inhibitor, restored Syk
`expression and function.36,37
`
`1 of 9
`
`BI Exhibit 1019
`
`

`

`2094
`
`Cytotoxicity of anti-CD33 mAb and GO correlate with Syk expression
`L Balaian and ED Ball
`
`5-Aza is a nonspecific Syk DNA methyltransferase inhibitor
`that is used for the treatment of myelodysplasia38 and possibly
`AML.39,40 However, the effects of 5-aza on leukemia cell growth
`are not well defined. As expression levels of Syk are likely to
`play an important role for the competency of the immune system
`and may also play a role in oncogenesis, we examined a panel
`of 40 primary AML samples for possible correlations between
`Syk expression and their response to the anti-proliferative effects
`of unmodified or immunotoxin-bound anti-CD33 mAb.
`
`Materials and methods
`
`Antibodies
`The anti-CD33 mAb was obtained from Medarex Inc. (Prince-
`ton, NJ, USA). Anti-Syk, anti-SHP-1, anti-CD33 rabbit or goat
`polyclonal antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Bio-
`technology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The anti-CD13 mAb was
`purchased from Cell Sciences Inc. (Norwood, MA, USA). A horse-
`radish peroxidase-conjugated anti-phosphotyrosine mAb, 4G10,
`was obtained from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (Lake Placid,
`NY, USA).
`
`Materials
`All chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St
`Louis, MO, USA).
`
`Cells
`The human AML cell line Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL)-60 was
`obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). Cells from AML
`patients were collected from peripheral blood after informed
`consent under the auspices of the University of California San
`Diego Institutional Review Board. Mononuclear cells were
`isolated on a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient and cultured under
`standard conditions
`in Rosewell Park Memorial
`Institute
`medium (RPMI)-1640 containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS)
`and 100 ng/ml of granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating
`factor.
`
`Proliferation assay
`AML cells were cultured in triplicate wells in 96-well round
`bottom plates, with or without various amounts of anti-CD33 or
`control anti-CD13 mAb in a final volume of 200 ml of RPMI-10
`at 371C in humidified 5% CO2 in air, at 105 cells per well. The
`cultures were pulsed with 1 microCi [3H]-thymidine per well
`during the last 3 h of the 48 h culture for cell lines. Primary AML
`cells were pulsed during the last 16 h of culture. The amount of
`3H-thymidine incorporated into acid-precipitable DNA was
`assessed via liquid scintillation counting.
`
`Flow cytometry analysis
`Leukemia cells were washed and then suspended in staining
`media (SM), containing RPMI-1640, 3% FCS, 0.01% NaN3 and
`1 mg/ml propidium iodide (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA, USA), plus
`saturating amounts of fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated
`anti-CD33, anti-CD64 mAbs, or an isotype-matched control
`mAb of irrelevant specificity. After 30 min at 41C, the cells were
`washed in SM twice and then analyzed on a FACScan (Becton
`Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). Dead cells and debris were
`excluded from analysis by characteristic forward and side-
`scatter profiles and propidium iodide staining. The immuno-
`phenotype of primary AML peripheral blood mononuclear cells
`
`Leukemia
`
`was determined by flow cytometry. CD2, CD3, CD7, CD10,
`CD13, CD14, CD15, CD16, CD19, CD20, CD33, CD34, CD64,
`CD95, human leukocyte antigen-DR, TdT expression were
`analyzed. All antibodies were obtained from BD Pharmingen
`(San Jose, CA, USA).
`
`Cell transfection
`SMARTpool small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) (collection of at
`least four individual siRNA, catalog No. 60–047 ) that target
`human Syk (Gen Bank Accession No. NM_003177) as well as
`control RNA (nonspecific pool) were purchased at Upstate
`Biotechnology Inc. (Lake Placid, NY, USA). Leukemia cells were
`transfected according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly,
`cells (3–4 106) were transfected by 5 mg of Syk siRNA or
`control naked siRNA mix using 6 ml Lipofectamine 2000
`(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Seventy-two hours after
`transfection, the cells were used for proliferation assays and
`Western blot analysis.
`
`Cell activation and immunoprecipitation
`Mononuclear cells from AML patients or AML cell lines (5–
`6 106) were activated by 10 mg/ml anti-CD33 or anti-CD13
`mAb of similar isotype for 20 min at room temperature, followed
`by addition of polyclonal anti-mouse IgG at 20 mg/ml
`for
`variable times (1–60 min). The reaction was stopped by adding
`ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After three washes in
`ice-cold PBS, the cells were lysed in lysis buffer, containing 1%
`(v/v) Triton X-100, 0.15 M NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH¼ 7.2),
`0,1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1 mM Na-orthovanadate,
`1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1% (v/v) ethylenediamine-
`tetraacetic acid, 1% (v/v) Aprotinin and 0.03 mM Leupeptin.
`After 30 min on ice,
`the nuclear debris was removed by
`centrifugation for 15 min at 13 000 g. Lysates were equalized
`with respect to the amount of protein as assessed by optical
`density at 280 nM. Specific immunoprecipitation was performed
`for 2 h to overnight in the presence of 30% (vol./vol.) ‘Protein
`A/G’, conjugated with agarose (Santa Cruz Biotech., Santa Cruz,
`CA, USA). Immunoprecipitates were washed three times in lysis
`buffer and then suspended in equal volume of Laemli sample
`buffer for SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE).
`
`SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting
`Total cell lysates or immunoprecipitates were added to separate
`wells (8 mg/well) of SDS-PAGE (7.5–10% acrylamide) gel,
`electrophoretically size-separated under reducing conditions,
`and then transferred onto nitrocellulose for immunoblotting. The
`filters were first incubated for 1 h in 5% non-fat dry milk in PBS-
`T (PBS plus 0.01% Tween 20), and then incubated with the
`primary antibody for 2 h. After washing in PBS-T, the filters were
`incubated for 1 h in horseradish peroxidase-conjugated match-
`ing secondary antibodies. The filters were then washed in PBS-T,
`incubated with the enhanced chemoluminescence detection
`reagents (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA), and exposed to X-ray film
`(Fuji Film, Fischer, Tustin, CA, USA). In all figures, samples were
`run in parallel gels.
`
`Statistical analyses
`S.e.m. calculation, graph production and statistical evaluation
`were performed using Sigma-Plot 8.0 version (Systat Software
`Inc., Point Richmond, CA, USA) and Microsoft Excel (Microsoft,
`Seattle, WA, USA). Statistical significance of
`the difference
`between sample groups was calculated by using the Student’s
`
`2 of 9
`
`BI Exhibit 1019
`
`

`

`t-test and was defined as a P-value less than or equal to 0.05.
`The significance of observed differences in proportions was
`tested using the w2 test and was defined as a Pp0.05.
`
`Results
`
`The growth inhibitory effects of anti-CD33 mAb:
`correlation with Syk expression
`The cell surface CD33 receptor on myeloid leukemia cells
`functions as a negative regulator of cell growth. Anti-CD33
`mAb-mediated growth arrest occurs
`in a dose-dependent
`
`Table 1
`
`Syk expression on primary AML samples
`
`FAB
`
`MO
`M1
`M2
`M3
`M4
`M5
`M6
`M7
`Unknown
`
`Total no.
`of
`samples
`
`CD33
`expression
`(median) (%)
`
`No. of Syk-
`positive
`samples
`
`No. of Syk-
`negative
`samples
`
`1
`5
`7
`1
`10
`9
`2
`1
`4
`
`92
`81
`85
`73
`86
`94
`85
`92
`83
`
`1
`2
`5
`1
`5
`5
`2
`1
`3
`
`0
`3
`2
`0
`5
`4
`0
`0
`1
`
`Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; FAB, French-American-
`British.
`
`2095
`
`Cytotoxicity of anti-CD33 mAb and GO correlate with Syk expression
`L Balaian and ED Ball
`
`than 0.1 mg/ml.28,29 At
`manner, at concentrations greater
`optimal concentrations (0.1 mg/ml), anti-CD33 mAb inhibited
`colony formation of HL-60 cells by 450% and DNA synthesis
`in primary AML cells up to 40%. We previously found that
`CD33 ligation induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the tyrosine
`kinase Syk, but not of src-family tyrosine kinases (Fyn, Lyn).28,29
`As these results suggested an important role of Syk in CD33
`signaling, we tested a panel of 40 primary AML samples from
`different French-American-British (FAB) types for Syk expression
`(Table 1). All samples had high blast counts (data not shown),
`and the majority (36 of 40) contained high percentages (460%)
`of surface CD33. By Western blotting (data not shown), Syk
`expression was undetectable in about 37% (15 of 40) of primary
`AML samples. We did not detect any correlation between Syk
`expression and FAB type or CD33 expression.
`We previously reported that anti-CD33 mAb induced dose-
`dependent growth inhibition more effectively in primary AML
`cells that expressed Syk.29 Here,
`in order
`to amplify the
`representative groups, a panel of 40 primary AML samples
`was tested for their response to the optimal concentration
`(0.1 mg/ml) of anti-CD33 mAb (Figure 1a). The level of inhibition
`in Syk-positive samples was considerably higher (mean value
`435%) than in Syk-negative samples (mean value o20%). This
`difference was statistically significant (Po0.05; Student’s t-test).
`Moreover, among Syk-positive samples (n¼ 25), 68% demon-
`strated significant growth inhibition in response to CD33
`ligation (responders, as defined by 425% inhibition of 3H-
`thymidine uptake by anti-CD33 mAb) whereas 32% had no
`significant response (non-responders, defined by o25% growth
`inhibition) (Figure 1b). In contrast, only 20% of the Syk-negative
`
`a-CD13 mAb
`a-CD33 mAb
`
`( n = 2 5 )
`
`S y k +
`
`( n = 1 5 )
`
`S y k -
`
`
`
`Syk - samples
`(15 of 40)
`
`R2
`
`0%
`
`non-R
`32%
`
`P =0.0033
`Chi-square test
`
`non-R
`80%
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`(% of control media basal level)
`
`Inhibition of proliferation
`
`Syk + samples
`(25 of 40)
`
`a
`
`b
`
`R6
`
`8%
`
`Figure 1 Correlation between Syk expression and the anti-proliferative effect of CD33 ligation in primary AML cells. (a) Proliferation assay.
`Primary AML cells were cultured for 48 h in the presence or absence of 0.1 mg/ml of anti-CD33 mAb or control anti-CD13 mAb. 3H-thymidine
`incorporation was measured during the last 18 h of culture. Basal proliferation in the absence of antibody (c.p.m.45500 c.p.m.) was considered 0,
`and results are expressed as % change for each condition. Samples were grouped according to the expression of Syk/Zap70 and their response to
`CD33 ligation. Responders (R) are defined as samples with 425% inhibition of 3H-thymidine uptake in the presence of anti-CD33 mAb, whereas
`non-responders (NR) are defined as samples with o25% inhibition. Error bars indicate the s.e.m. (b) Correlation between Syk expression and the
`response of AML primary cells to CD33 ligation. Summary of primary AML proliferation.
`
`Leukemia
`
`3 of 9
`
`BI Exhibit 1019
`
`

`

`Cytotoxicity of anti-CD33 mAb and GO correlate with Syk expression
`L Balaian and ED Ball
`
`2096
`
`samples (n¼ 15) responded to anti-CD33 mAb. These results
`suggest a correlation between Syk expression and responsive-
`ness of AML cells to CD33 ligation (P¼ 0.0033 by w2 test).
`
`The growth inhibitory effects of GO (immunotoxin-
`conjugated anti-CD33): correlation with Syk expression

`As Syk
`AML cells were more likely to respond to CD33
`
`ligation with growth inhibition compared to Syk
`AML samples,
`we asked whether the anti-proliferative effect of GO might also
`depend on the presence of Syk. GO inhibited DNA synthesis in
`a dose-dependent manner in both Syk-positive and Syk-negative
`samples, but the level of inhibition was significantly higher in

`compared to Syk samples at all concentrations tested
`the Syk
`(Po0.003, Student’s t-test) (Figure 2a). The difference was more
`prominent at low doses of GO and diminished at higher doses,
`probably owing to free toxin activity.
`Response to GO was defined as 450% inhibition of 3H-
`thymidine uptake at 10 ng/ml, whereas non-responders demon-
`strated o50% inhibition at this concentration. In Syk-positive
`AML samples, the number of responsive samples was signifi-
`cantly higher (73%) compared to Syk-negative samples (17%)
`(Figure 2b). These data show a correlation between Syk
`expression in primary AML cells and the inhibitory activity of
`GO (P¼ 0.02; w2 test).
`
`siRNA-mediated silencing of Syk expression largely
`prevents the anti-proliferative response of AML cells
`to anti-CD33 mAb and GO
`To determine whether Syk expression was required for CD33-
`mediated inhibition of DNA synthesis, we used a siRNA strategy
`to downregulate Syk expression. We transfected HL-60 cells
`with Syk-specific siRNA or control siRNA using Lipofectamine
`2000 (Figure 3). Seventy-two hours post-transfection, Syk was
`undetectable by Western blotting in cells treated with the Syk-
`siRNA,
`the level of SHP-1 was unchanged in these cells,
`demonstrating specificity of the effect (Figure 3c). Downregula-
`
`tion of Syk expression largely prevented the anti-proliferative
`effects of the naked anti-CD33 mAb (Figure 3a) as well as the
`immunotoxin-conjugated mAb GO (Figure 3b). Thus,
`the
`Syk-specific
`siRNA converted initially
`Syk-positive
`and
`CD33-responsive AML cells into Syk-negative non-responsive
`cells. These results show that Syk plays a central role in CD33
`signaling.
`
`5-Aza treatment of Syk-negative primary AML cells
`increases their response to GO and anti-CD33 mAb
`Syk is an important tyrosine kinase, which appears to function as
`a tumor suppressor that is silenced by hypermethylation in many
`cancer cells. As we found a correlation between Syk expression
`and the response of primary AML samples to GO and anti-
`CD33 m Ab, the DNA methylase inhibitor 5-aza was used in a
`panel of 40 primary AML samples alone (Figure 4) and in
`combination with GO or anti-CD33 mAb (Figure 5).
`First, we analyzed dose- and time-dependent anti-prolifera-
`tive effects of 5-aza on human leukemia cell
`line HL-60
`(Figure 4a). Treatment conditions: dose of 100 nM for 48 h was
`considered as
`suboptimal, and was used in consequent
`experiments with primary AML cells. Based on the level of
`inhibition mediated by 5-aza, we distinguished three groups of
`primary AML samples (Figure 4b). The majority (21 of 40
`samples) demonstrated low response (inhibition of proliferation
`o25%).
`In nine of 40 samples, 5-aza treatment
`induced
`medium (25–50% inhibition) and in 10 of 40 samples this treat-
`ment mediated high (450% inhibition) responses. Response to
`5-aza was defined as 425% inhibition of 3H-thymidine uptake
`at 100 nM after 48 h treatment, whereas non-responders
`demonstrated o25% inhibition at these treatment conditions.
`In Syk-positive AML samples, the number of responsive samples
`was
`significantly higher
`(60%) compared to Syk-negative
`samples (26%) (Figure 4c). These data suggest a correlation
`between Syk expression in primary AML cells and the inhibitory
`activity of 5-aza (P¼ 0.04; w2 test).
`
` Syk + (n =25) AML samples
` Syk - (n=15) AML samples
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
` Proliferation (% of control)
`
`a
`
`b n
`
`on-R
`36%
`
`none
`
`1
`
`
`
`5
`10
`50
`100
`GO concentration (ng/ml)
`
`500
`
`1000
`
`Syk + samples (25 of 40)
`
`Syk- samples (15 of 40)
`
`R1
`
`7%
`
`P = 0.02;
`Chi-square test
`
`non-R
`83%
`
`R6
`
`4%
`
`Figure 2 The effect of GO on growth of AML cells is dependent on Syk expression. (a) Dose-dependent inhibition of proliferation induced by GO
`treatment. Proliferation assays were performed with primary AML cells as described in Figure 1a. GO was added for 48 h at the indicated
`concentration. Basal cell proliferation of untreated cells (410 000 c.p.m. of 3H-thymidine incorporation) was considered to be 100%.
`(b) Correlation between Syk expression and the response of primary AML cells to GO treatment. Summarized data (mean) for 25 Syk-positive and
`15 Syk-negative samples are presented. Error bars indicate the s.e.m.
`
`Leukemia
`
`4 of 9
`
`BI Exhibit 1019
`
`

`

`Cytotoxicity of anti-CD33 mAb and GO correlate with Syk expression
`L Balaian and ED Ball
`
`2097
`
`1
`10
`100
`none
`1000
`GO concentration (ng/ml)
`untreated cells
`control si-RNA treated
`Syk si-RNA treated
`
`120
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`0
`
`b
`
`Proliferation (% of control)
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`cntrl RNA Syk si-RNA
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`a
`
`Proliferation (% of control)
`
`media
`α-CD13 mAb
`α-CD33 mAb
`
`c
`
`I
`
`IP
`
`IgG
`1 2 3 4
`
`Syk
`1 2 3 4
`
`I I
`
`IP
`
`IgG
`1 2 3 4
`
`SHP-1
`1 2 3 4
`
`1 – untreated cells
`2 – control RNA treated cells
`3 – Syk siRNA treated cells
`4 – positive control (I-Raji or II-U-937 cells)
`
`probed with
`α-Syk Ab
`Syk
`
`probed with
`α-SHP-1 Ab
`SHP-1
`
`Figure 3 siRNA silencing of Syk expression decreases the anti-proliferative response of primary AML cells to anti-CD33 mAb including GO.
`(a and b) Proliferation assay. HL-60 cells were transfected with Syk siRNA or control siRNA. Seventy-two hours post-transfection, cells were treated
`with either naked anti-CD33 mAb or control anti-CD13 mAb (a) or they received the indicated concentrations of GO (b). Proliferation assays were
`performed as described in Figure 1a. The basal 3H-thymidine incorporation of untreated cells was 410 000 c.p.m. (considered as 100%). Data
`represent the mean7s.e.m. of three independent experiments. The asterisks indicate statistically significant difference between groups of data.
`(c) Western blots of HL-60 cells transfected with Syk siRNA or control siRNA. After 72 h of culture, cell
`lysates were subjected to
`immunoprecipitation and Western blotting with the indicated mAb. Shown results represent one of three independent experiments.
`
`2
`
`=
`
`w ( n
`
`l o
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`b
`
` (% of untreated cell proliferation)
`
`Inhibition of proliferation
`
`9 )
`
`=
`
`d i u m ( n
`
`0 )
`
`1
`
`=
`
`h ( n
`
`1 )
`h i g
`m e
`Group response to 5-aza treatment
`
`Syk+ (n=15) samples
`n-R
`n=11,
`73%
`
`R
`n=4,
`27%
`
`R
`n=15,
`60%
`
`P=0.04
`Chi-square test
`
`5 aza 100 nM
`5 aza 1000 nM
`
`none
`
`1
`2
`4
`Days in culture
`
`5
`
`c
`
`Syk+ (n=25) samples
`
`n-R
`n=10,
`40%
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`a
`
`Proliferation (% of control)
`
`Figure 4 The effect of 5-aza on growth of AML cells is dependent on Syk expression. (a) Proliferation assay. HL-60 cells were treated with
`indicated concentrations of 5-aza for 1–5 days. After two washes, proliferation assays were performed as described in Figure 1a. The basal
`3H-thymidine incorporation of untreated cells was 410 000 c.p.m. (considered as 100%). Data represent the mean7s.e.m. of three independent
`experiments. (b) Proliferation assay. Primary AML cells were cultured for 48 h in the presence of 100 nM of 5-aza and then after two washes,
`proliferation assays were performed as described in Figure 1b. (c) Correlation between Syk expression and the response of primary AML cells to
`5-aza treatment. Summary of primary AML cell proliferation.
`
`Leukemia
`
`5 of 9
`
`BI Exhibit 1019
`
`

`

`Cytotoxicity of anti-CD33 mAb and GO correlate with Syk expression
`L Balaian and ED Ball
`
`2098
`
`Syk+ samples (n=25)
`
`Syk- samples (n=15)
`
`b
`120
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`0
`none
`1
`α-CD33 mAb concentration (μg/ml)
`
`none
`
`0.1
`
`0.1
`
`1
`
`Syk- samples (n=15)
`
`Syk+ samples (n=25)
`
`d
`120
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`0
`
`none
`
`1
`
`10
`
`100
`GO concentration (ng/ml)
`
`none
`
`1
`
`10
`
`100
`
`a
`120
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`0
`
`c
`120
`100
`80
`60
`40
`20
`0
`
`Proliferation (% of conrol)
`
`Figure 5 5-Aza treatment of primary AML cells increases response to anti-CD33 mAb and GO. Primary AML cells were pretreated with 5-aza
`(100 nM) for 48 h. After two washes, proliferation assays were performed as described in Figure 1a. Summarized data (mean) for 25 Syk-positive
`(a and c) and 15 Syk-negative (b and d) samples are presented. Error bars indicate the s.e.m.
`
`no treatment
`5-aza (100nM ) 48h treatment
`
`Next, we analyzed the effects of the combined treatment of
`AML primary cells with 5-aza and then with either anti-CD33
`mAb or GO (Figure 5). In Syk-positive samples, pretreatment
`with 5-aza enhanced (about 20%) the anti-proliferative effects
`of antibody (Figure 5a) or GO (Figure 5c). Similar experiments
`with control isotype-matching anti-CD13 mAb did not result
`in increased growth inhibition (data not shown). Meanwhile,
`in Syk-negative primary samples, pretreatment with 5-aza led to
`statistically significant (Po0.05, Student’s t-test) enhancement
`of growth inhibition (up to 40% increase) induced by GO or
`anti-CD33 mAb (Figure 5b and d).
`We examined whether treatment with 5-aza may restore Syk
`expression in Syk-negative AML cells through induction of
`generalized DNA hypomethylation. In 15 Syk-negative primary
`AML samples, five (33%) showed restored Syk expression after
`5-aza treatment (Figure 6a and b). In Syk-positive samples, the
`level of Syk expression was unchanged. Of note, in two of five
`(40%) SHP-1-negative primary AML samples, 5-aza treatment
`also restored SHP-1 expression (data not shown).
`Treating Syk-positive AML cells with single-agent 5-aza at
`100 nM inhibited DNA synthesis by almost 40%, whereas the
`same drug concentration caused o20% inhibition in Syk-
`negative cells (Figure 6c). 5-Aza in combination with GO or
`anti-CD33 caused less than additive inhibition of DNA synthesis
`in Syk-positive cells (Figure 6c, left panel).
`induce re-
`In Syk-negative cells where 5-aza did not
`expression of Syk,
`the addition of GO or anti-CD33 mAb
`enhanced the anti-proliferative effect of 5-aza (Figure 6c, middle
`panel).
`In contrast, Syk-negative AML cells, where 5-aza
`induced re-expression of Syk, were only marginally inhibited
`by 5-aza or anti-CD33 mAb alone, whereas the combination
`produced a more than additive effect in AML cells (Figure 6c,
`right panel). Even the effect of GO was almost doubled by 5-aza
`in these cells. Thus, total inhibition of DNA synthesis in the
`
`presence of 5-aza plus GO or anti-CD33 mAb reached 60–70%
`and was similar in Syk-positive and Syk-negative cells.
`
`Discussion
`
`the anti-proliferative
`time that
`We demonstrate for the first
`effects of GO in AML is associated with the expression of Syk
`and that 5-aza treatment of Syk-negative and, therefore, poorly
`responsive, AML cells restored sensitivity to CD33 ligation-
`induced cytotoxicity mediated by both GO and unconjugated
`anti-CD33 mAb.
`ligation of CD33 molecules
`Recent studies showed that
`mediated AML cell growth inhibition,7–10 activation of protein
`tyrosine phosphatases SHP-1 and SHP-2,3–5 and a recruitment of
`the Syk protein tyrosine kinase.28,29 These events led to
`apoptosis and inhibition of cell growth. Our previous experi-
`ments also proved that the inhibitory effect of anti-CD33 mAb
`was caused by ligation of the CD33 molecule itself rather than
`through Fc receptor crosslinking.41 We also demonstrated that
`Syk expression was associated with the response of leukemia
`cells to the anti-proliferative effect of unconjugated anti-CD33
`mAb.29 In this study, we expanded these observations in a larger
`panel of primary AML samples (n¼ 40). Western blots detected
`25 (63%) Syk-positive and 15 (37%) Syk-negative samples.
`These data confirm our previous findings
`that Syk was
`undetectable in about 30% primary AML samples and that the
`expression of Syk correlated with response to CD33 ligation.21
`Significant differences in CD33 signaling between responsive
`and non-responsive AML cells that expressed Syk were found
`(29 and data not shown). In CD33-responsive AML samples,
`CD33 ligation induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Syk and
`Syk/CD33 and Syk/SHP-1 de novo complex formation. How-
`ever, CD33 signaling in CD33-non-responsive AML samples
`
`Leukemia
`
`6 of 9
`
`BI Exhibit 1019
`
`

`

`Cytotoxicity of anti-CD33 mAb and GO correlate with Syk expression
`L Balaian and ED Ball
`
`2099
`
`a
`
`b
`
`Syk-/-,
`n=10, 25%
`
`t
`n
`a (
`
`t m e
`z
`a
`-
`
`a
`
`5
`
`0
`
`0
`
`1
`
`e
`
`o t r
`
`n
`
`)
`
`h
`
`8
`
`n M 4
`
`Syk+,
`n=25, 62%
`
`Syk-/+,
`n=5, 13%
`
`AML #13 – (1 of 25 Syk+)
`
`AML #9 – (1 of 5 Syk-/restored)
`
`AML #11 – (1 of 10 Syk-/non-restored)
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`II.Syk -/- (n=10;25% of total)
`*
`
`80
`
`*
`
`none a-CD13 a-CD33 GO
`no treatment
`5-aza (100 nM 48 h)
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`III.Syk -/+(n=5; 13% of total)
`
`*
`
`*
`
`none a-CD13 a-CD33 GO
`
`I.Syk + (n=25;63% of total)
`
`none a-CD13 a-CD33 GO
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`(% of control)
`
`c
`
`Inhibition of proliferation
`
`Figure 6 5-Aza treatment of Syk-negative primary AML cells increases response to anti-CD33 mAb and GO. (a and b) Western blot data. At 48 h,
`cells were harvested and analyzed by Western blotting for Syk expression. Syk/ is an abbreviation for Syk-negative samples where Syk was not
`restored by 5-aza. Syk/þ is an abbreviation for Syk-negative samples where Syk was restored by 5-aza treatment. (c) Proliferation assay. Primary
`AML cells were treated with 5-aza for 48 h, washed and cultured in the presence or absence of anti-CD33 or CD13 mAb (0.1 mg/ml) or GO
`(0.01 mg/ml) for 48 h and the proliferation assay performed as described in Figure 1. Bars marked with asterisk have a statistically significant
`difference between groups (Po0.05, Student’s t-test).
`
`was different from responsive samples and from each other. In
`AML sample No. 18, CD33 ligation did not induce tyrosine
`phosphorylation or recruitment of Syk or Syk/SHP-1 complex
`formation.
`In AML sample No. 19, CD33 ligation induced
`tyrosine phosphorylation of Syk. However, no Syk/SHP-1 or Syk/
`CD33 complex formation was detected.
`These differences in CD33 signaling confirmed our previous
`findings29 and revealed the importance of not only the presence
`of Syk, but its functional activity. These data altogether prove the
`significance of Syk in CD33 signaling.
`That prompted us to investigate whether or not the response of
`AML cells to GO is also dependent on Syk expression. It is even
`more intriguing as 50% of GO is not conjugated to calichea-
`mycin (package insert), and hence some of its activity is in fact
`due to anti-CD33 mAb signaling. Our results demonstrated a
`strong correlation between the response of AML cells to low
`doses of GO and Syk expression. Higher doses of GO
`diminished differences between Syk-positive and Syk-negative
`samples, possibly owing to the effects of free toxin. Moreover, in
`Syk-positive samples, the number of responders was signifi-
`cantly higher compared to Syk-negative samples. These data
`suggested a correlation between Syk expression and the
`response of AML cells to Mylotarg. To confirm Syk engagement
`in CD33 signaling in anti-proliferative effects of both unconju-
`gated anti-CD33 mAb and Mylotarg, we performed ‘blocking’
`experiments with Syk siRNA. Seventy-two hours after transfec-
`tion, Syk was undetectable by Western blot and HL-60 leukemia
`cells (originally responsive to anti-CD33 mAb cytotoxic activity)
`became unresponsive. The anti-proliferative effect of GO in
`transfected cells also diminished. These data demonstrate the
`importance of Syk in CD33- or GO-mediated cytotoxicity.
`As GO is widely used in the treatment of AML,10 but effective
`only in one-third of patients, understanding the mechanisms of
`its cytotoxicity is important. We hypothesize that determining
`Syk expression before treatment can serve as a biomarker and,
`
`therefore, increase the efficacy of GO or unconjugated anti-
`CD33 mAb.
`In order to augment the anti-proliferative effects of GO and
`anti-CD33 mAb, we considered methods of upregulating Syk
`expression and/or increasing (restoring) its activity. Absence of
`Syk expression, mediated by hypermethylation, is linked to cell
`u

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket