throbber
Leukemia Research 25 (2001) 1115–1125
`
`www.elsevier.com/locate/leukres
`
`Direct effect of bispecific anti-CD33×anti-CD64 antibody on
`proliferation and signaling in myeloid cells
`
`Larisa Balaian a, Edward D. Ball b,*
`a Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, Uni6ersity of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
`b Blood and Marrow Transplantation Di6ision, Uni6ersity of California, 9500 Gilman Dri6e, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0960, USA
`
`Received 22 January 2001; accepted 27 April 2001
`
`Abstract
`
`Bispecific anti-CD33×anti-CD64 antibody (BsAb) directly inhibited proliferation and colony formation of human acute
`myeloid leukemia cell lines, without affecting the function of normal monocytes. Addition of BsAb to normal monocytes induced
`tyrosine phosphorylation of Cbl and Vav, association of these molecules with CD33, and downstream signaling. In leukemia cells
`that were insensitive to BsAb treatment, Vav and Cbl were constitutively phosphorylated and, therefore, constitutively associated
`with CD33. Direct growth inhibition is an additional mechanism by which BsAb may be useful in the therapy of AML. © 2001
`Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: Myeloid leukemia; Fc receptors; Monocytes; Bispecific antibodies
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Leukemia cells from patients with acute myeloid
`leukemia (AML) commonly express certain myeloid-
`specific antigens such as CD33 and CD64 [1–3]. Con-
`siderable attention has been focused on targeting
`these antigens with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for
`therapeutic effects [4]. Bispecific antibodies (BsAb),
`targeting leukemia-associated antigens simultaneously
`with targeting activating antigens on cytotoxic effec-
`tor cells, offer a novel and powerful approach to
`anti-leukemia therapy [5]. We have previously re-
`ported the production of BsAb CD33×anti-CD64
`[6,7] and have demonstrated its in-vivo and in-vitro
`activities in mediating lysis of AML cells by cytotoxic
`myeloid effector cells [6,8,9]. However, the direct ef-
`fect of the BsAb on AML cells was not previously
`examined. Since both CD33 and CD64 are present on
`AML cells, the effects induced by this BsAb after
`binding to either CD33 alone, CD64 alone, or both
`antigens, could be determined by both the molecular
`
`* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-858-657-7053; fax: +1-858-657-
`6837.
`E-mail address: tball@ucsd.edu (E.D. Ball).
`
`signaling cascades of either one or both of the anti-
`gens.
`CD64 is a member of the Fcg receptor family of
`cell-surface proteins that play an important role in
`both host defense and autoimmune disorders. Fcg re-
`ceptor signaling can lead to downstream events such
`as phagocytosis, ADCC, enhancement of antigen pre-
`sentation and the release of
`intracellular cytokines
`and reactive oxygen intermediates [10]. Ligation of
`monocyte-associated CD64 results in rapid tyrosine
`phosphorylation
`on
`several
`signal
`transduction
`molecules. These molecules include the immunorecep-
`tor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) of the g
`chain [11,12], and several non-receptor PTKs: the src-
`family members Hck, Lyn [13] and Fgr [14]; Syk [14–
`16]; the protooncogenes c-Cbl
`[17,18] and Vav [14];
`and phospholipase C (PLC) [19]. However, the leuko-
`cyte immunoglobulin-like receptors (LIR) -1 and -2,
`which are also expressed on monocytes, are bound to
`the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1. Co-ligation of either
`LIR with CD64 inhibits tyrosine phosphorylation of
`the associated Fc receptor g chain and Syk molecules,
`as well as intracellular calcium mobilization [20]
`CD33 is a cell-surface antigen specifically expressed
`on myeloid cells including myeloid leukemia cells. It
`
`0145-2126/01/$ - see front matter © 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
`PII: S0145-2126(01)00084-4
`
`1 of 11
`
`BI Exhibit 1015
`
`

`

`2.2. Materials
`
`All chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical
`Co. (St. Louis, MO).
`
`2.3. Cells and cells lines
`
`Human AML cell lines HL-60 and U-937 were ob-
`tained from ATCC. Cell-line DER was created earlier
`in our laboratory. The NB4 cell line was a gift from
`Dr. Lanotte (Hospital St. Louis of Paris, France). All
`leukemia cells were cultured under standard condi-
`tions in RPMI-1640 containing 10% FCS.
`Monocytes were isolated via adherence from pe-
`ripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from nor-
`mal donors as described elsewhere [24].
`
`L. Balaian, E.D. Ball /Leukemia Research 25 (2001) 1115–1125
`1116
`is the smallest member of the siglec (s6 ialic acid-bind-
`ing Ig-related lectins)
`family, and is a 67 kDa
`transmembrane glycoprotein expressed by the earliest
`myeloid progenitors. It continues to be present during
`myelomonocytic differentiation on monocytes and
`neutrophils. However,
`the expression of CD33 on
`neutrophils is much lower than on monocytes. It has
`been shown recently that
`the cytoplasmic tail of
`CD33 contains two tyrosine-based motifs, both poten-
`tial ITIMs. MAb directed against CD33 are used in
`the diagnosis of leukemia and for therapeutic target-
`ing and purging in AML. However, despite its clinical
`importance, little is known of its role in myeloid cells,
`except that it may be involved in sialic acid-depen-
`dent cell interactions. While the expression of CD33
`on myeloid cells was first described in the early 1980s
`[1], only very recently have data regarding the possi-
`ble function(s) of CD33 been reported [21–23]. Tay-
`lor
`demonstrated
`that CD33
`becomes
`tyrosine
`phosphorylated in myeloid cells after both pervana-
`date treatment and CD33 receptor cross-linking, re-
`sulting in recruitment of tyrosine phosphatases SHP-1
`and SHP-2 [22]. Phosphorylation of CD33 was spe-
`cifically inhibited by an Src family tyrosine kinase
`inhibitor. Moreover,
`the first cytoplasmic tyrosine
`residue (LXY340XXL) of CD33 is dominant in SHP-
`1/SHP-2 binding, and mutation of this same tyrosine
`enhances CD33-mediated adhesion. Co-ligation of
`CD33 and CD64 on monocytes resulted in decreased
`phosphorylation and duration of phosphorylation of
`various proteins, suggesting that recruitment of SHP-
`1 to CD33 resulted in a general decrease in kinase
`activity [21]. This raises the possibility that, similar to
`CD22 in B cells and p75/AIMR1 in NK cells, CD33
`might act as an inhibitory receptor in myeloid cell
`signaling leading to inhibition of cell growth and
`apoptosis.
`Here, we report our findings on the direct effects of
`anti-CD33×anti-CD64 BsAb on cells from AML cell
`lines and normal monocytes from healthy donors.
`
`2.4. Proliferation assay
`
`AML cells were cultured in triplicate wells in 96-
`well round-bottomed plates, with or without various
`amounts of BsAb in a final volume of 200 ml of
`RPMI-10 at 37 °C in humidified 5% CO2 in air, at
`105 cells per well. The cultures were pulsed with 1
`mCi [3H] thymidine per well during the last 3 h of the
`3 h culture. The amount of 3H-thymidine incorpo-
`rated into acid-precipitable DNA was assessed via liq-
`uid scintillation counting.
`
`2.5. Colony formation assay
`
`AML cells were cultured in 0.3% agarose as de-
`scribed elsewhere [25]. Briefly, 104 cells were placed in
`35 mm tissue culture dishes containing tissue culture
`media RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and
`agarose at final concentration of 0.3%. After a 10–14
`day incubation in the presence of various concentra-
`tion of antibodies at 37 °C, the number of colonies
`was estimated under the light microscope. Clusters
`containing less than 40 cells were excluded from anal-
`ysis.
`
`2. Materials and methods
`
`2.1. Antibodies
`
`The mAb anti-CD33, anti-CD64 and anti-CD33×
`anti-CD64 BsAb were obtained from Medarex, Inc.
`(Annandale, NJ). The anti-Syk, anti-Vav, anti-Cbl,
`anti-CD33 rabbit or goat polyclonal antibodies were
`purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa
`Cruz, CA). A horse-radish-peroxidase-conjugated anti-
`phosphotyrosine mAb, 4G10, was obtained from Up-
`state Biotechnology Inc.
`(Lake Placid, NY). The
`fluorescein-labeled anti-CD14, anti-CD33 and anti-
`CD64 mAb was obtained from B&D (San Jose, CA).
`
`2.6. FACS analysis for CD64 and CD33
`
`Normal or leukemic cells were washed and then
`suspended in staining media (SM), containing RPMI-
`1640, 3% FCS, 0.01% NaN3 and 1 mg/ml of propid-
`ium iodide
`(Calbiochem, La
`Jolla, CA),
`plus
`saturating amounts of FITC-conjugated anti-CD33,
`anti-CD64 mAbs, or an isotype-matched control mAb
`of irrelevant specificity. After 30 min at 4 °C, the
`cells were washed in SM twice and then analyzed on
`a FACScan (Becton Dickinson). Dead cells and de-
`bris were excluded from analysis by characteristic for-
`ward and side scatter profiles and propidium iodide
`staining.
`
`2 of 11
`
`BI Exhibit 1015
`
`

`

`L. Balaian, E.D. Ball /Leukemia Research 25 (2001) 1115–1125
`
`1117
`
`2.7. Phagocytosis assay
`
`Monocytes were cultured 5 days in the presence of 50
`ng/ml of GM-CSF (Immunex Inc., Seattle, WA). After
`two washes with PBS, cells were stained with FITC-la-
`beled anti-CD14 (green fluorescence) mAb for 30 min
`at room temperature then washed twice with PBS and
`transferred to a polypropylene 96-well plate at a con-
`centration of 105/well. E. coli particles (Molecular
`Probes Inc., Eugene, OR) pre-stained with tetramethyl-
`rhodamine (red fluorescence) were added to monocytes
`at a 10:1 ratio. Various concentrations of BsAb or
`control antibody were added in a 10 ml volume. After
`incubation at 37 °C for 1 or 3 h, each well was flushed
`with medium and the cell suspension transferred to a
`fresh tube. After fixation with 2% paraformaldehyde,
`the cells were deposited on slides by cytocentrifugation
`and then analyzed by fluorescent microscopy. The per-
`centage of double-stained cells was calculated.
`
`2.8. Cell acti6ation and immunoprecipitation
`
`Monocytes from normal donors or AML cell lines
`(5–6× 106) were activated by 10 mg/ml BsAb anti-
`CD33×anti-CD64 or unconjugated anti-CD33 and
`anti-CD64 mAb for 20 min at room temperature, fol-
`lowed by the addition of polyclonal anti-mouse IgG at
`20 mg/ml for different time points (from 1 min to 1 h).
`The reaction was stopped by adding ice-cold PBS. After
`three washes in ice-cold PBS, cells were lysed in lysis
`buffer, containing 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 0.15 M NaCl,
`50 mM Tris–HCl [pH=7.2], 0,1% SDS, 1 mM Na-or-
`thovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1%
`[v/v] EDTA, 1% [v/v] Aprotinin, and 0.03 mM Leu-
`peptin. After 30 min on ice, the nuclear debris was
`removed by centrifugation for 15 min at 13,000×g.
`Lysates were equalized with respect to the amount of
`protein, as assessed by O.D. at 280 nM. Specific im-
`munoprecipitation was performed for 2 h toovernight
`in the presence of 30% (vol./vol.) ‘Protein A/G’, conju-
`gated with agarose (Santa Cruz Biotech., CA). Im-
`munoprecipitates were washed three times in lysis
`buffer and then suspended in an equal volume of
`Laemli sample buffer for SDS-PAGE.
`
`2.9. SDS-PAGE and Western blotting
`
`idase-conjugated matching secondary antibodies. The
`filters then were washed in PBS-T, incubated with the
`enhanced
`chemoluminescence
`detection
`reagents
`(Pierce, Rockford, IL), and exposed to X-ray film (Fuji
`Film, Fischer, Tustin, CA).
`
`3. Results
`
`3.1. Inhibition of AML cell proliferation and colony
`formation upon BsAb ligation
`
`We examined AML cells for their response to recep-
`ligation measuring 3H-thymidine incorporation.
`tor
`HL-60, U-937, NB4 and DER cells were incubated with
`the anti-CD33×anti-CD64 BsAb, or unconjugated sin-
`gle mAb anti-CD33 or anti-CD64 or both mAB. We
`found that BsAb significantly (PB0.001) inhibited pro-
`liferation of HL-60 and U-937 cells in a dose-dependant
`manner, but failed to decrease proliferation of DER
`cells (Fig. 1). In NB4 cells we also observed significant
`(about 60%) inhibition of proliferation initiated by
`BsAb (data not shown). Interestingly, the level of inhi-
`bition was maximal at BsAb concentrations of 0.01–0.1
`mg/ml. These data suggest that the effect was not caused
`by antibody toxicity. Meanwhile,
`incubating HL-60
`cells with the unconjugated anti-CD33 or anti-CD64
`mAb did not decrease proliferation of leukemia cells. In
`contrast, U-937 cells were responsive to the combina-
`tion of both unconjugated mAb. However, DER cells
`were not responsive to either BsAb or unconjugated
`mAb.
`The ability of BSAB to inhibit the leukemia cells
`growth was confirmed by a similar dose-dependent
`reduction of colony formation in both HL-60 (PB
`0.001) and U-937 (PB0.001) cells (Fig. 2), but not in
`DER cells (data not shown). However, we found that
`incubation of leukemia cells with both unconjugated
`mAb did not affect colony formation. Importantly, in
`both proliferation and colony formation assays, the
`maximum BSAB activity was observed at a concentra-
`tion of 0.01–0.1 mg/ml and therefore was probably not
`caused by antibody toxicity.
`
`3.2. Effect of IFN-k on sensiti6ity of AML cells to
`antibody treatment
`
`Total cell lysates or immune-precipitates were added
`to separate wells (8 mg/well) of SDS-PAGE (7.5–10%
`acrylamide) gel, electrophoretically size-separated under
`reducing conditions, and then transferred onto nitrocel-
`lulose for immunoblotting. The filters were first incu-
`bated for 1 h in 5% non-fat dry milk in PBS-T (PBS
`plus 0.01% Tween 20), and then incubated with the
`primary antibody for 2 h. After washing in PBS-T, the
`filters were incubated for 1 h inhorse-radish perox-
`
`We investigated the levels of CD33 and CD64 expres-
`sion on three leukemia cell lines: HL-60, U-937 and
`DER. CD33 was expressed at 95, 97 and 96%, respec-
`tively (data not shown). CD64 was expressed at 79, 95
`and 30%, respectively (data not shown). Since our
`experiments did not detect differences between AML
`cells in the level of CD33 expression, but indicated that
`the level of CD64 expression on DER cells was signifi-
`cantly lower, we addressed the question of whether the
`
`3 of 11
`
`BI Exhibit 1015
`
`

`

`1118
`
`L. Balaian, E.D. Ball /Leukemia Research 25 (2001) 1115–1125
`
`increased level of CD64 on DER cells would alter the
`cells’ response to antibody ligation. After treatment of
`U-937 (responsive) and DER (unresponsive) cells with
`200 mg/ml of INF-g at 37 °C for 24 h, the level of
`CD64 expression was 98 and 64%, respectively. We
`performed proliferation assays in the presence or ab-
`sence of 0.1 mg/ml of various antibodies. We found that
`IFN-g was able to increase significantly (PB0.001) the
`sensitivity of DER cells (which were initially unrespon-
`sive)
`to antibody ligation (Fig. 3). U-937 cells re-
`sponded to BsAb and the combination of anti-CD33
`and anti-CD64 mAb even without INF-g treatment.
`
`However, the effects of BsAb and single mAb were
`increased after treatment of the cells with IFN-g.
`
`3.3. Stimulation of normal monocyte phagocytosis by
`BsAb
`
`Since CD33 and CD64 antigens are expressed by
`both AML cells and normal monocytes, we examined
`whether or not BsAb ligation could affect the phago-
`cytic function of monocytes. We incubated monocytes
`from five normal donors in the presence of 50 ng/ml of
`GM-CSF for 5 days and then analyzed their ability to
`
`Fig. 1. Effect of BsAb on proliferation of leukemia cells. Leukemia cells were cultured for 4 h intriplicate for each condition in tissue culture
`media supplemented with 0.5% FBS in the presence of various concentrations of antibodies. 3H-thymidine was added at the initiation of culture.
`The basal level of cell proliferation was considered as 100%, and the percentage of basal stimulation was calculated for each condition. Each
`histogram represents results of five independent experiments. Error bars indicate the standard error about the mean (S.E.M.).
`
`Fig. 2. Effect of BsAb on leukemia cells colony formation. Leukemia cells were cultured in 0.3% agarose in triplicate for each condition in the
`presence of various concentrations of antibodies. After 14 days of culture, the number of colonies was enumerated in each dish. The basal level
`of colony formation was considered as 100%, and the percentage of stimulation was calculated for each condition. Each histogram represents
`results of four independent experiments. Error bars indicate S.E.M.
`
`4 of 11
`
`BI Exhibit 1015
`
`

`

`L. Balaian, E.D. Ball /Leukemia Research 25 (2001) 1115–1125
`
`1119
`
`Fig. 3. Effect of INF-g on sensitivity of AML cells to antibody treatment. U-937 and DER cells were cultured in the presence or absence of 200
`u/ml of INF-g for 24 h under standard conditions. After two washings proliferation assays were performed in the presence of various antibodies
`as described in Fig. 1. Each bar represents the percentage of inhibition, calculated as the difference between the basal level of 3H uptake (media
`alone) and the results of proliferation for each condition. Error bars indicate S.E.M.
`
`integrate pre-stained E. coli particles in the presence of
`BSAB, unconjugated anti-CD33 and anti-CD64 anti-
`bodies or the combination of both mAb. We found
`that, in contrast to anti-CD33 mAb, anti-CD64 mAb as
`well as BsAb significantly increased (PB0.001) the
`phagocytic activity of monocytes (Fig. 4). This effect
`was present when we treated cells with a combination
`of two unconjugated antibodies, but the level of phago-
`cytosis was lower. Time-course experiments revealed
`that in all five samples tested, the level of BsAb-medi-
`ated phagocytosis after 3 h oftreatment was higher
`compared to that at 1 h. Meanwhile, at both time
`points, the effect was dose-dependent.
`
`3.4. Induction of tyrosine phosphorylation by BsAb
`ligation
`
`In order to determine the mechanisms of the func-
`tional diversity between normal monocytes and AML
`cells, we analyzed the signaling cascade leading to
`leukemia
`cell
`growth
`inhibition.
`Since
`tyrosine
`phoshorylation is an early and obligatory event in cell
`activation, we examined protein phosphorylation in-
`duced by BsAb ligation by immunoblot analysis using
`an antibody to phosphotyrosine. After the addition of
`BsAb to normal monocytes or AML cells, in normal
`monocytes, we observed rapid phosphorylation of
`protein(s) that were of approximately 100–120 kDa
`(data not shown). In contrast, similar treatment of
`AML cells did not induce phosphorylation of addi-
`tional proteins. However, the majority of proteins in
`AML cells were constitutively phosphorylated (data not
`shown). Time-course experiments showed that induced
`protein tyrosine phosphorylation could be detected as
`early as 1 min after BsAb ligation. Protein phosphory-
`lation reached a peak level at approximately 2 min, but
`still could be detected for at least 1 h after stimulation
`
`(data not shown). This indicates that BsAb ligation
`induces rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of cytosolic
`proteins independent of other stimulatory signals and
`serves as a stimulatory factor that is sufficient to induce
`activation of phagocytosis in normal monocytes. How-
`
`Fig. 4. Effect of BsAb on phagocytosis of normal monocytes. Normal
`monocytes were stained with CD14-FITC and mixed with pre-stained
`tetramethylrhodamine E. coli particles in the presence of various
`concentrations of antibodies. The numbers of double stained (phago-
`cytic) cells were estimated for each condition under fluorescent micro-
`scope. Each bar indicates the percentage of phagocytic cells for each
`condition. Error bars indicate S.E.M. Bars marked with an asterisk
`have mean values that are significantly higher than that of the control
`condition (PB0.005, Student’s t-test).
`
`5 of 11
`
`BI Exhibit 1015
`
`

`

`1120
`
`L. Balaian, E.D. Ball /Leukemia Research 25 (2001) 1115–1125
`
`Fig. 5. Effect of BsAb on Cbl phosphorylation. Normal monocytes (6A) or leukemia cell line DER cells (6B) were treated for 20 min with 10
`mg/ml of BsAb, anti-CD33 mAb, anti-CD64 mAb or a combination of both single antibodies followed by the addition of 20 mg/ml of polyclonal
`mouse IgG for 2 min. Cell lysates were prepared and then used to generate immune precipitates with normal rabbit IgG or anti-Cbl antibody.
`Top row: immunoblot with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody; bottom row: immunoblot with anti-Cbl antibody.
`
`ever, BsAb ligation did not induce phosphorylation in
`AML cells and appears to inhibit proliferation and
`colony formation due to detected differences between
`normal monocytes and AML cells in their basal level
`of tyrosine phosphorylation.
`
`3.5. Identification of proteins that are
`tyrosine-phosphorylated following BsAb ligation
`
`Having established that BsAb ligation induced
`phosphorylation of 120 kDa cytosolic protein(s), we
`analyzed whether Cbl and Vav are involved in its
`signaling cascade. We performed immunoprecipitation
`of these proteins in resting and antibody-treated cell
`
`immunoblot
`followed by phosphotyrosine
`lysates
`analysis. We found that the addition of BsAb, as well
`as unconjugated anti-CD33 and anti-CD64 mAb or
`both mAb, did induce rapid tyrosine phosphorylation
`of Cbl and Vav in monocytes of normal donors
`(Figs. 5A and 6). In contrast, Cbl and Vav were con-
`stitutively phosphorylated in resting leukemic cells
`prior to antigen ligation (Figs. 5B and 6). Further-
`more, the addition of BsAb or unconjugated anti-
`CD33 or anti-CD64 mAb to AML cells did not
`increase the level of tyrosine phosphorylation of Cbl
`or Vav. These data demonstrate the difference be-
`tween normal monocytes and AML cells in BsAb sig-
`naling.
`
`6 of 11
`
`BI Exhibit 1015
`
`

`

`L. Balaian, E.D. Ball /Leukemia Research 25 (2001) 1115–1125
`
`1121
`
`3.6. Identification of proteins that are tyrosine-phosphory-
`lated following per6anadate treatment
`
`BsAb ligation leads to activation of both the CD33 and
`the CD64 signaling pathways. The effects of CD64
`ligation have been well described, but CD33 signaling
`pathways are less well studied. Therefore, we examined
`the proteins that are involved in CD33 signaling. Normal
`monocytes and AML cells were treated with pervana-
`date, which is known to induce phosphorylation by
`blocking the activity of tyrosine phosphatases, and then
`performed co-immunoprecipitation of CD33 with several
`protein kinases and their substrates.
`Co-immunoprecipitation of CD33 and Syk revealed
`no differences in the phosphorylation pattern between
`normal monocytes and AML cells (Fig. 7). In both cases,
`Syk formed a complex with CD33 only after it became
`phosphorylatred upon pervanadate treatment.
`Similar experiments with proto-oncogenes Vav and
`
`Cbl revealed not only differences between normal mono-
`cytes and AML cells but also the heterogeneicity of AML
`cells. In two AML cells lines, HL-60 (Figs. 8 and 9) and
`U-937 (data not shown), as well as in normal monocytes
`(data not shown), Vav and Cbl formed complexes with
`CD33 only when they were phosphorylated after per-
`vanadate treatment. However, in DER cells (Figs. 8 and
`9), these proteins were constitutively phosphorylated
`and, therefore, associated with CD33. These data demon-
`strate that: (a) CD33 uses Syk, Vav and Cbl for its
`signaling and (b) CD33 associates with their phosphory-
`lated forms. In some AML cells, Cbl and Vav are
`constitutively phoshorylated, a situation that may alter
`CD33 signaling.
`
`4. Discussion
`
`An understanding of steps involved in the anti-CD-
`
`Fig. 6. Effect of BsAb on Vav phosphorylation. Normal monocytes or leukemia cell line DER cells were incubated with BsAb (+ lines) as
`described above or left untreated (− lines). Cell lysates were prepared and then used to generate immune precipitates with normal rabbit IgG or
`anti-Vav antibody. Top row: immunoblot with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody; bottom row: immunoblot with anti-Vav antibody.
`
`Fig. 7. Co-immunoprecipitation of CD33 and Syk in pervanadate-treated cells. Normal monocytes and leukemia cell line HL-60 were incubated
`with 1 mM pervanadate for 10 min at 37 °C (+ lines) or left untreated (− lines). Cell lysates were prepared and then used to generate immune
`precipitates with rabbit IgG or anti-Syk antibody. Top row (A): immunoblot with anti-CD33 antibody. Medium row (B): immunoblot with
`anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. Bottom row (C): immunoblot with anti-Syk antibody.
`
`7 of 11
`
`BI Exhibit 1015
`
`

`

`1122
`
`L. Balaian, E.D. Ball /Leukemia Research 25 (2001) 1115–1125
`
`Fig. 8. Co-immunoprecipitation of CD33 and Vav in pervanadate-treated cells. Two leukemia cell lines DER and HL-60 were treated with
`pervanadate as described in Fig. 8. Cell lysates were prepared and then used to generate immune precipitates with rabbit IgG or anti-Vav
`antibody. Top row (A): immunoblot with anti-CD33 antibody. Medium row (B): immunoblot with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. Bottom row
`(C): immunoblot with anti-Vav antibody.
`
`Fig. 9. Co-immunoprecipitation of CD33 and Cbl in pervanadate-treated cells. Two leukemia cell lines DER and HL-60 were treated with
`pervanadate as described in Fig. 8. Cell lysates were prepared and then used to generate immune precipitates with rabbit IgG or anti-Cbl antibody.
`Top row (A):
`immunoblot with anti-CD33 mAb. Medium row (B):
`immunoblot with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. Bottom row (C):
`immunoblot with anti-Cbl antibody.
`
`33×anti-CD64 BsAb-induced signaling cascade in
`myeloid cells is of potential clinical significance. This
`antibody has been prepared using a chemical linkage
`technique [6,7] and was active in vitro in mediating ADCC
`by monocytes [6,8,9]. In a mouse model in vivo, anti-
`CD33×anti-CD64 BsAb demonstrated the ability to
`increase the anti-tumor effects of INFg-stimulated mono-
`cytes (unpublished results). Currently, this antibody is
`under study in a Phase 1 clinical trial for patients with
`relapsed AML. Therefore, we decided to investigate the
`direct effect of the BsAb on leukemia cells to further define
`its mechanism(s) of action. We found that BsAb was able
`to decrease proliferation and colony formation of some
`AML cells. BsAb-induced inhibition of colony formation
`demonstrated that the effect of BsAb on leukemia cells
`was most likely a direct effect rather than the alternative
`possibility that reciprocal
`lysis occurred from one
`leukemia cell expressing CD64 killing an adjacent
`leukemic cell expressing CD33 through BsAb bridging.
`
`Recently, it was demonstrated that anti-CD33 antibody
`diminished the level of leukemia cell proliferation [26] and
`prevented generation of dendritic cells from both mono-
`cytes and CD34+ myeloid precursors [27]. This function
`was ascribed to the inhibitory nature of the CD33
`molecule. In our experiments, however, single anti-CD33
`or anti-CD64 mAb failed to demonstrate inhibitory
`activity in both proliferation and colony formation assays.
`After 3 h of culture, we detected an inhibitory effect only
`in the proliferative response of U-937 cells when we treated
`these cells with a combination of both single anti-CD33
`and CD64 antibodies. These discrepancies could be
`explained by the variety of reasons: source of anti-CD33
`antibody and/or time of culture. We indicated that a
`longer (48 h) treatment of AML cells with anti-CD33 mAb
`resulted in inhibition of AML cell proliferation (data not
`shown).
`Since normal monocytes express on their surface both
`CD33 and CD64 molecules [1,5], and we found that BsAb
`
`8 of 11
`
`BI Exhibit 1015
`
`

`

`L. Balaian, E.D. Ball /Leukemia Research 25 (2001) 1115–1125
`
`1123
`
`inhibited proliferation of leukemia cells, we examined
`whether it could alter the phagocytic activity of normal
`monocytes. We demonstrated that BsAb increased the
`phagocytic activity of normal monocytes against E. coli
`particles. Earlier in our laboratory, Zhong et al. (unpub-
`lished results) observed a similar effect of BsAb on
`phagocytosis of normal monocytes against tumor cells.
`Since we found that single anti-CD64 mAb was also able
`to increase phagocytosis, we concluded that this effect
`might be ascribed to the activating function of the CD64
`molecule. Our data are in concordance with earlier
`published results [10,28].
`We detected differences between various leukemia
`cells in their levels of surface CD64 expression while
`levels of CD33 expression were less variable. Impor-
`tantly, we noted that a low level of CD64 molecule
`expression was associated with the inability of leukemia
`cells to respond to antibody stimulation in DER cells.
`However, after INF-g mediated upregulation of CD64,
`these cells became responsive to BsAb and single mAb
`treatment. Taken together, these data prompted us to
`investigate BsAb-mediated signaling in myeloid cells.
`Both CD33 and CD64 molecules have been noted to
`initiate the downstream signaling cascade in myeloid
`cells resulting in activation of various classes of protein
`tyrosine kinases (PTK) and protein tyrosine phos-
`phatases (PTP). Monocyte CD64 ligation triggers cellu-
`lar events that are crucial for a variety of immune
`responses. These include phagocytosis, production of
`cytokines, release of agents that damage microorgan-
`isams or infected cells, and changes in expression of cell
`surface proteins
`involved in cell-to-cell
`interaction
`[29,30]. Signaling events triggered by CD64 cross-linking
`result in phosphorylation of tyrosine on several impor-
`tant signal transduction molecules. Tyrosine kinases of
`the Src-family [13,14] and Syk [14–16,31,32] become
`activated and associate with ITAM. Targets of these
`activated PTKs include the Fc-g R itself [11,12], enzymes
`that generate second messengers (PLC-g and PI3-kinase)
`[19,33],
`and regulators of Ras, Vav
`and Cbl
`[14,17,18,33–35].
`Little is known about CD33 signaling in myeloid cells
`except that the cytoplasmic tail of CD33 contains two
`ITIMs, and after activation, CD33 becomes tyrosine-
`phosphorylated and recruits tyrosine phosphatases SHP-
`1 and SHP-2 [21–23]. However, the balance between
`CD33 and CD64 molecules on the cell surface and/or
`their possible interaction needs to be investigated in
`more detail.
`We detected differences between normal monocytes
`and AML cells in their phosphorylation pattern and
`response to BsAb treatment. In normal cells, BsAb
`ligation induced rapid phosphorylation of protooncoge-
`nes Vav and Cbl. In contrast, in some AML cells, these
`proteins were constitutively phosphorylated, and BsAb
`cross-linking did not change their levels. Moreover, the
`
`majority of proteins in untreated AML cells were consti-
`tutively phosphorylated. This finding is important since
`PTKs regulate a variety of cellular functions, including
`cell proliferation and differentiation [36]. Enhanced or
`dysregulated PTK activity has been implicated in many
`hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cancers [37,38].
`Excessive PTK activity can result in hematopoietic cell
`transformation; perturbation of either PTKs or PTPs
`may result in uncontrolled cell growth. Myeloid cells are
`responsive to cytokines that induce tyrosine phosphory-
`lation and can become ligand-independent when endoge-
`nous PTKs become dysregulated. Specific PTPs, through
`mutation or altered expression, may enhance PTK activ-
`ity and also cause myeloid ligand independence [39].
`In order to understand how important phosphoryla-
`tion of Vav and Cbl are in CD33 signaling in general,
`we treated normal myeloid and leukemia cells with
`pervanadate. This results in blocking of PTPs and
`subsequent phosphorylation of PTKs and their sub-
`strates,
`leading to CD33 downstream signaling. We
`examined Vav, Cbl and Syk phosphorylation since we
`found involvement of the first two in BsAb-mediated
`signaling. Additionally, Syk is a very important PTK
`often associated with Vav and Cbl.
`Our co-immunoprecepitation studies demonstrated
`that in normal monocytes, CD33 signals using Syk, Vav
`and Cbl, and associates only with their phosphorylated
`forms. In AML cells, the phosphorylation patterns are
`different from normal cells and, importantly, differ from
`one leukemia cell line to another. Although we did not
`detect any differences in the phosphorylation pattern of
`Syk, we noted major differences in the tyrosine phospho-
`rylation of Vav and Cbl between normal and some AML
`cells. Unlike in normal monocytes, these proteins were
`phosphorylated in untreated DER cells and, therefore,
`are in complex with CD33. Moreover, the level of
`tyrosine phosphorylation in these cells was not changed
`by pervanadate treatment. Constitutively phosphory-
`lated forms of Cbl and Vav may preclude leukemic cells
`from responding to CD33 signaling or alter the response.
`This notion is supported by the finding that AML cells
`are heterogeneous in their response to BsAb signaling. In
`contrast to HL-60 and U-937 cells, in DER leukemic
`cells, BsAb could not induce inhibition of proliferation
`and colony formation, unless they were treated with
`INF-g.
`Our data suggest that in normal monocytes, CD33
`recruits Syk, Cbl and Vav for its signaling. In leukemia
`cells, which,
`in contrast to normal monocytes, have
`constitutively phoshorylated forms of Cbl and Vav,
`downstream events following CD33 ligation might be
`altered. This results in an anergic, impaired response of
`AML cells to CD33 signaling. However, we cannot
`exclude the possibility that sensitivity of leukemia cells
`to BsAb treatment is associated with the level of CD64
`expression. Similar impairment due to constitutive phos-
`phorylation of certain proteins may occur in CD64
`
`9 of 11
`
`BI Exhib

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket