throbber
United States Patent [19]
`Sutton et al.
`
`lllllllllllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`5,117,444
`May 26, 1992
`
`USOO51 17444A
`Patent Number:
`Date of Patent:
`
`[11]
`[45]
`
`[54] HIGH ACCURACY PEDOMETER AND
`CALIBRATION METHOD
`.
`.
`[75] Inventors: William R. Sutton, 4898 Dolores Dr.,
`Pleasamon, Calif- 94566; Scott L.
`Noble, San Jose, Calif-
`[73] Assignee: W. Ron Sutton, Pleasanton, Calif.
`[21] Appl. No.: 559,076
`[22] Filed:
`JUL 30, 1990
`
`5
`[51] Int. Cl. ............................................ .. GlllC 22/00
`U-S. Cl. ................................. ..
`,
`[58] Field of Search """"""""""
`
`2;
`’
`
`526%
`
`’
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0219407 12/1983 Japan ........................ .. 377/242
`0079197 4/1988 Japan ........................ .. 377/242
`Primary Examiner-John S. Heyman
`Attorney’ Agent’ or ?rm-mom“! B‘ Mam
`[57]
`ABSTRACr
`Apreferred embodiment of the present invention com
`prises a pedometer having a housing, a weighted pendu
`lum, a magnet and reed switch’ a microprocessor’ a
`display, three puslrbottons’ a hinged door
`a
`spring cam device that holds the door open and shut,
`and a replaceable belt hook. The entire unit is powered
`by an oversized lithium battery that has an expected life
`of seven years. A unique method of user calibration
`simpli?es user input and provides maximum- calibration
`accuracy regardless of operational or stride artifact
`"anamns'
`
`17 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U_S_ PATENT DOCUMENTS
`377/24 2
`4 223 2“ 9/1980 Ansen at 81
`4:387:437 6/1983 Lowrey et al. ........... .. 364/561
`4,741,001 4/1988 Ma ............................ .. 377/242
`4,821,218 4/1989 Potsch ............................... .. 364/566
`
`50
`
`55 \
`
`58 v
`\
`I
`62
`
`64
`
`52
`-
`Mlcrocomputer
`
`LCD Display
`3Q
`
`Memories
`.5_4
`
`Pushbuttons _
`
`2.2.
`
`~
`
`anew
`
`E
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1016, Page 1 of 8
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`May 26, 1992
`
`Sheet 1 of 3
`
`5,117,444
`
`
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1016, Page 2 of 8
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1016, Page 2 of 8
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`May 26, 1992
`
`Sheet 2 of 3
`
`5,117,444
`
`\
`
`60
`
`Fig_5
`
`56 \
`
`64
`58
`‘_zg______
`‘
`I
`62
`
`§_2_
`Microcomputer
`
`Pushbuttons
`
`LCD Display
`EQ
`
`.
`Memones
`_5_‘1
`
`'
`
`*
`Battery
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1016, Page 3 of 8
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`May 26, 1992
`
`Sheet 3 of 3
`
`5,117,444
`
`F|g_6
`
`60
`
`5% g;
`
`-
`
`58v
`
`64
`
`-z\—+— Step Counter
`/
`1° *
`62
`
`i Divide by Five
`Step Memory
`
`'
`
`7_2
`
`F ig_7
`
`62
`
`_E_______ Step Counter
`29
`If Compare
`Step Memory
`7__2
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1016, Page 4 of 8
`
`

`

`1
`
`HIGH ACCURACY PEDOMETER AND
`CALIBRATION METHOD
`
`5,117,444
`2
`tension. Improved switching in the prior art has been
`realized by mounting a small permanent magnet to a
`pendulum made of brass and by placing a reed switch at
`the outside point of the pendulum’s arc. The reed
`switch has contacts maintained under glass seal, and the
`magnet on the pendulum need only get close to establish
`contact. Reed switch pedometers are much more reli
`able and give fewer false readings than other prior art
`devices. A Casio mathematical cadence device uses a
`time-based method, instead of a stride detector. In the
`time-based method, a user is expected to take a standard
`length stride each time the device beeps. If the user fails
`to take a stride, and the device beeps, the Casio device
`will nevertheless assume a step was taken. A failure by
`the user to stay in step with the cadence is therefore a
`major source of error in the Casio pedometer.
`_
`Invariably the prior art makes some assumptions
`about the length of strides taken by the user. A user
`must enter a stride length into the pedometer, and that
`length will be used in the future calculations of the
`distance traveled. These stride estimates are a source of ~
`great inaccuracy, because the user may only be guessing
`at the length of his or her stride, or the estimate of a
`stride is based on a small, arti?cial sample. In addition,
`strides can vary. Artifacts of a user’s walk or run can
`also vary over a few strides, and artifacts'of the pedom
`eter’s operation can also vary, especially in interaction
`with different users. A pedometer placed on a user’s
`wrist, as opposed to a user’s belt, would generate so
`many unusual artifacts of motion, that all prior art pe
`dometers would not be able to function with any ac
`ceptable accuracy. In addition, the stride resolution of
`prior art pedometers, as mentioned above, can contrib
`ute to inaccurate measurements. And given the small
`sizes of mechanical pedometers, dialing in the correct
`stride length can be very difficult. A pedometer that
`simpli?es stride calculation, or eliminates it altogether
`would be an improvement over the prior art.
`Prior art pedometers, generally, cannot be turned on
`or off. Even electrically instrumented pedometers mea
`sure all the time. In addition, none have the ability to
`store information in multiple registers, and none can
`track multiple events. An example of a useful multi
`event function would be a user’s goal to walk 20 miles
`during ?ve consecutive lunch hours during the week.
`Event number one would be Monday’s walk, event
`number two would be Tuesday’s walk, and so on to
`event number ?ve being Friday’s walk. A sixth event
`could be the running total walked for the week. Prior
`art devices could only deal with one of these events,
`and a user would have to select which one by starting
`and stopping around the event of interest. Such starting
`and stopping would clear any previous results, because
`there is no memory in any of the prior art pedometers.
`A user would either have to give up knowing the daily
`totals or the weekly total. Since there is'no “off,” a user
`would also have to make a separate record for later
`reference at the end of the event of interest, because the
`pedometer will continue to advance with any further
`physical activity whether related to the particular event
`or not. 4
`Housings for prior art pedometers and their associ
`ated knobs and displays require a user to detach the
`pedometer from a belt hook or shoe and to bring it close
`enough to the user’s face to see the small numbers, or to
`open it in such a manner that signi?cant false readings
`may occur. Such action can jiggle the device and cause
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`5
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`1. Field of the Invention
`The invention relates generally to pedometers and
`speci?cally to electronic-type multi-event capable de
`vices for the measurement of traveled distances or other
`. activity based on oscillations of position within or out
`side a gravity ?eld.
`2. Description of the Prior Art
`Pedometers primarily measure the distance walked or
`run by a human wearer of the device by virtue of the up
`and down motion made by the wearer during each
`stride. Pedometers have also been attached to farm
`animals to measure physical activity. The distance trav
`eled by a user of a pedometer is the length of the user’s
`stride times the number of strides the user takes. Typical
`pedometers employ a weighted pendulum suspended
`horizontally from an axis by a spring. The inertia of the
`pendulum’s weight will cause the pendulum to move in
`relation to the pedometer each time the wearer takes a
`stride. The more repeatable a user’s activity is from
`event to event, the more accurate will be the resulting
`measurement. It is possible for pedometers to measure
`many other kinds of activity besides walking or run
`ning, including mathematical conversion of data to
`“points” or “indices,” not directly related to distance,
`e.g., aerobic points for playing tennis.
`The prior art comprises two ways of detecting the
`movement of the pendulum, (l) mechanically, and (2)
`electrically. In mechanical detection pedometers, a disk
`with teeth around its circumference is attached by a
`ratchet to the pendulum. (See, US. Pat. No. 4,560,861,
`issued to Kato, et al., on Dec. 24, 1985; and see US. Pat.
`No. 4,322,609, issued to Kato on Mar. 30, 1982.) Each
`stride causes the ratchet to advance by one or more
`teeth positions. The length of arc the pendulum is al
`lowed to swing is controlled by adjustable stops. A
`wide setting, stop-to-stop, sets the pedometer for a long
`stride, such as in running. A narrow setting is used
`typically for strolling. The resolution of such pedome
`ters is limited by the distance represented by the arc
`distance between adjacent teeth on the toothed disk.
`The resolution is often no greater than one-quarter to
`one-half foot. In a mile, that can lead to resolution inac
`curacies as much as $250 to $500 feet.
`Electrically instrumented pedometers mimic their
`mechanical counterparts. In electrical pedometers the
`weighted pendulum is out?tted with a switch contact
`that will close each time the vpendulum completes a
`swing. Ordinary switches, however, are prone to inter
`mittent operation and a full swing against the balance
`spring must be made to ensure contact. Running will
`subject the weighted pendulum to as much as three G’s,
`and will probably result in good switch contact. But to
`enable operation during walking, which can produce as
`little as 0.5 G’s, the balance spring must be made very
`light. Too light a balance spring will allow the weighted
`pendulum to swing violently, and can cause false read
`ings. The prior art controls balance spring tension with
`an adjustment. Many manufacturers have only a two
`point adjustment, “walk" and “run" , and a few others
`have continuously adjustable balance spring tensioners
`(e.g., Yamasa Tokei Meter Co., Ltd., Japan). A large
`proportion of patents dealing with the prior art are
`addressed to the problem of controlling balance spring
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1016, Page 5 of 8
`
`

`

`5
`
`25
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`3
`false readings to occur, because the pedometer will
`interpret the jostling as additional strides in the mea
`sured event. Belt hooks are also easily broken off and
`cannot be replaced, thus effectively ending the life of
`the unfortunate‘pedometer.
`SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
`It is therefore an object of the present invention to
`improve the accuracy of pedometer measurements.
`It is a further object of the present invention to allow
`the accurate measurement of any non-exact, oscillating
`motion event.
`It is a further object of the present invention to ‘sim
`plify the user’s calibration of a pedometer.
`It is a further object of the present invention to allow
`at least two users to use the same pedometer without
`one user’s use disturbing the other user’s calibration or
`in progress events.
`It is a further object of the present invention to make
`measurement inherently “unitless” so users can select
`any convenient unit of measurement.
`It is a further object of the present invention to pro
`vide a start/stop function to eliminate spurious, non
`event measurements before or after an event or during
`any time-outs. Any remainders should be kept or round
`ed-off, at the option of the user.
`It is a further object of the present invention to elimi
`nate accidental resetting of a pedometer.
`‘
`It is a further object of the present invention to allow
`multiple calibrations in one unit, so that different types
`of events can be accurately measured by the same unit
`without recalibration between events.
`It is a further object of the present invention to pro
`vide a pedometer that may be worn on a user’s wrist, or
`any other part of the body. Pedometers can easily be
`lost when worn on a belt.
`It is a further object of the present invention to pro
`vide a safety means to prevent inadvertently losing a
`pedometer from the user’s body.
`It is a further object of the present invention to elimi
`nate false inputs caused by taking a pedometer off of a
`user’s body to make some reading or setting.
`It is a further object of the present invention to elimi
`nate variations in measurements caused by the variabil
`ity of a user’s artifacts associated with walking, running,
`riding, or other activity.
`It is a further object of the present invention to mea
`sure all day activity accurately, even though measuring
`different types of events.
`It is a further object of the present invention to elimi
`nate errors stemming from interactions of a user’s stride
`artifacts and a pedometer’s operating artifacts.
`It is a further object of the present invention to allow
`measurement of multiple events.
`It is a further object of the present invention to pro
`vide a running total of several events.
`It is a further object of the present invention to have
`a display that is easily read by middle-aged users at a
`distance of two to three feet.
`It is a further object of the present invention to elimi
`nate dials to input stride lengths.
`It is a further object of the present invention to elimi
`nate battery replacement over the useful life of a pe
`dometer.
`Brie?y, a ?rst embodiment of the present invention
`comprises a housing having a weighted pendulum, a
`magnet and reed switch, a microprocessor, a LCD dis
`play, three push-buttons, a hinged door with a spring
`
`5,117,444
`4
`cam device that holds the door open and shut, and a
`replaceable belt hook. A second embodiment is substan
`tially the same as the ?rst, except a housing suitable for
`wearing on a user’s wrist is substituted. The entire unit
`in either of these embodiments is powered by an over
`sized lithium battery that has an expected life of seven
`years.
`An advantage of the present invention is that highly
`accurate performance is provided to one or more inter
`posing users, whether it’s worn on the belt, wrist, or
`other part of the body.
`Another advantage of the present invention is that
`operation is simpli?ed. Calibration can be set once and
`no recalibration is required until the user(s) change
`styles of movement, e.g., walking to running.
`Another advantage of the present invention is a sec
`ond calibration memory allows a ?rst calibration to‘be
`stored for, e.g., walking in a ?rst memory, and a second
`calibration, e.g., for running can be stored in a second
`memory. Thereafter, a walking or running event can be
`accommodated with a simple push on a single push-but
`ton. Switching between such events is just as easy, and
`each event can comprise both types of components.
`Another advantage of the present invention is that
`multiple events may be tracked and the events stored in
`multiple memory registers.
`Another advantage of the present invention is run
`ning totals of all the events are tracked.
`Another advantage of the present invention is that
`each register/event can be independently zeroed with
`simple two second push-button operations.
`Another advantage of the present invention is that
`opening the unit does not cause false inputs and read
`ings.
`Another advantage of the present invention is that
`sources of inaccuracy are eliminated or reduced.
`Another advantage of the present invention is that
`the display can be read and operated while still attached
`to a user’s belt. A door flips open that has no latches to
`break, and snaps shut after the user is done.
`Another advantage of the present invention that the
`display has large numbers and the display output is
`easily read.
`Another advantage of the present invention is that
`battery replacement is expected to be every seven years,
`thus for all practical purposes, battery replacement is
`eliminated over the entire practical marketing life of
`each unit.
`These and other objects and advantages of the pres
`ent invention will noldoubt become obvious to those of
`ordinary skill in the art after having read the following
`detailed description of the preferred embodiments
`which are illustrated in the various drawing ?gures.
`
`30
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`IN THE DRAWINGS
`FIG. 1(a) is a front view; FIG. 1(b) is a side view; and
`FIG. 1(c) is a top view of a pedometer having a pre
`ferred embodiment of the present invention;
`FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the assembly of the
`belt clip to the door for the pedometer of FIGS. 1(a
`H6);
`FIG. 3 is a cross-section of the belt clip in FIG. 1(c)
`taken along the line 3--3;
`FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the inside of the door
`for the pedometer of FIGS. l(a)—(c) and shows the
`opposite door face of FIG. 2;
`FIG. 5 is a block diagram of the electronic circuitry
`contained within the pedometer of FIGS. 1(a)—(c);
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1016, Page 6 of 8
`
`

`

`- O
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`5
`FIG. 6 is a block diagram of the calibrate mode con
`tained within the pedometer of FIGS. 1(a)-(c); and
`FIG. 7 is a block diagram of the operate mode con
`tained within the pedometer of FIGS. 1(a)—(c).
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`' EMBODIMENT
`Referring to FIGS. 1(a)-(c) a pedometer, referred to
`by the general reference numeral 10, has a housing 12
`and a door 14. On the door 14 is a detachable belt clip
`16. The door 14 is attached to housing 12 by a pair of
`hinges 18. When door 14 is closed on housing 12, a
`LCD display 20 and a plurality of push-buttons 22 will
`be covered. A tongue 24 is positioned on door 14 such
`that it enters an opening (not shown) in housing 12
`when door 14 is opened. Tongue 24 partially restricts
`the movement of a weighted pendulum (described be
`low) when door 14 is opened. Tongue 24 also serves to
`keep LCD display 20 level with the user’s eye and
`ground when being read. The positions and orientations
`of display 20, hinges 18, door 14, and belt clip 16 are
`such that a user of pedometer 10 may wear pedometer
`on his or her belt and simply ?ip open pedometer while
`still on the belt to read LCD display 20 and/or to oper
`ate push-buttons 22. This method of opening while still
`on a user’s belt and tongue 24 reduce or eliminate false
`readings that would otherwise be caused by the jiggling
`of pedometer while attempting to read or set pedometer
`10. The detachable feature of belt clip 16 allows re
`placement of the belt clip 16. The prior art is such that
`a broken belt clip often meant the whole unit was unus
`able. The present invention extends the useful life by
`providing for the inevitable breaking of belt clip 16. Belt
`clip 16 is held in place on door 14 by an inside snap 26
`and an outside snap 28 (detailed in FIG. 2). A pair of
`opposite edges 30 ?t snugly within a pair of guides 32.
`FIG. 2 shows the relationship of the assembly of belt
`clip 16 to door 14. Further details of belt clip 16 may be
`seen in FIG. 3. FIG. 4 clearly shows the relationship of
`tongue 24 to hinges 18.
`FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an electronic system
`contained within pedometer 10, referred to by the gen
`eral reference numeral 50. A microcomputer 52 com
`prises a CPU, RAM, ROM, input/output, and a control
`program. A plurality of memories 54, allows the mi
`crocomputer 52 to track a plurality of events and to
`display them on LCD display 20. Any remainders exist
`ing between events are kept or rounded-off, at the op
`tion of the user. A weighted pendulum 56 has a magnet
`58, a balance spring 60, and a reed switch 62. Pendulum
`56 swings on axis 64 such that magnet 58 comes close
`enough to reed switch 62 to cause electrical contacts
`within reed switch 62 to operate. Pendulum 56 will
`swing approximately once for every stride a user takes
`and switch contacts in reed switch 62 will open and
`close approximately once for each said stride. It should
`be understood that pendulum 56 is an example of an
`acceleration ?eld sensitive device, and that any acceler
`ation detector could be substituted with acceptable
`results. For example a solid state unit may be employed.
`Due to the unique and novel calibration method, de
`scribed below, it is not necessary, nor very important
`that pendulum 56 actually swing once suf?ciently to
`operate reed switch 62 for each stride of the user. It may
`happen that the peculiar characteristics of the user’s
`65
`gait, called artifacts of walking or running, are such that
`' every “X” number of strides produce zero or more than
`one switch closure per stride in reed switch 62. The
`
`5,117,444
`6
`prior art is almost universally dependent on one stride
`producing one swing of a pendulum, such as pendulum
`56.
`The present invention reduces or eliminates distance
`measurement errors by a method of calibration that
`takes into account a user’s walking/running artifacts
`and any artifacts of operation pedometer 10 itself may
`have, together with any interacting artifacts that exist
`between the pedometer 10 and the user. To calibrate
`pedometer 10, a user operates one of the push-buttons
`22 to enter into a ?rst or a second calibrate mode. See
`FIG. 6. A step counter 70 has an output that is divided
`by ?ve and applied to a step memory 72. Display 20 will
`indicate entry into each of these modes. The user then
`walks, runs, or rides a measured half unit of distance,
`e.g., a half mile. At the end of the measured half mile,
`the user operates one more of the push-buttons 22, and
`the ?rst calibration is complete and stored in a ?rst
`calibration memory within memories 54. See FIG. 7.
`Thereafter, the step counter 70 is compared with the
`step memory 72 and a current trip memory and total
`memory are incremented by a tenth of a whole unit. If
`the user ran the measured half mile, then pedometer 10
`will accurately measure the distance of any subsequent
`running. Similarly, if the user walked the measured half
`mile, then pedometer 10 will accurately measure the
`distance of any subsequent walking. A secondary cali
`bration memory, within memories 54, allows the stor
`age of a second user’s calibrated half mile, or it can store
`the alternate walking or running of a single user’s mea
`sured half mile in the ?rst calibration memory. In this
`?rst exemplary embodiment, during the calibration
`period, microcomputer 52 counts every ?fth switch
`closure from reed switch 62, effectively dividing the
`number of switch contacts produced in a half mile by
`?ve, and therefore resulting in a count that is equal to
`the number of switch contacts that can be predicted to
`occur when the present user repeats the same stride
`style in a tenth of a mile. Other embodiments could just
`as acceptably count every fourth, sixth, or any other
`_ number; counting every ?fth stride, as above, is done
`for simplicity’s sake. It is to be understood that the
`absolute number of switch closures produced in the
`measured half mile is relatively unimportant. What is
`important, is that this user will repeat that same mea
`sured number every time he or she travels a tenth of a
`mile.
`Users in Europe, or elsewhere, do not have to mea
`sure their travel in miles. Any unit of measure will suf
`?ce because the LCD display 20 displays only numbers
`to one decimal place, and not the name of the distance
`units. To operate the pedometer 10 so as to show kilo
`meters, the user simply walks a measured half kilometer
`during the above calibration procedure. As can be seen,
`even football ?elds (100 yards) can be used as units of
`measure, because calibrating from a goal line to the 50
`yard line would calibrate pedometer 10 to measure in
`football ?eld units, or tenths of hundred yards for golf
`ers.
`A battery 66 is a lithium type and powers electronic
`system 50. Preferably‘a type 2025 is used having l40
`mA/hour rating. The battery 66 is sized to last at least
`seven years, therefore making it a lifetime battery, be
`cause the practical life of pedometer 10 is estimated to
`be no more than ?ve to seven years.
`_
`A second embodiment is the same as the ?rst embodi
`ment described above, except the user wears it on his or
`her wrist. The housing is modi?ed to be worn on a wrist
`
`45
`
`50
`
`60
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1016, Page 7 of 8
`
`

`

`7
`and has a strap, such as is commonly used in wrist
`watches. The second embodiment appears at ?rst obser
`vation to be a wrist watch, and could alternatively and
`additionally provide conventional stopwatch and time
`of day functions. The theory of operation is as described
`above.
`Although the present invention has been described in
`terms of the presently preferred embodiments, it is to be
`understood that the disclosure is not to be interpreted as
`limiting. Various alterations and modi?cations will no
`doubt become apparent to those skilled in the art after
`having read the above disclosure. Accordingly, it is
`intended that the appended claims be interpreted as
`covering all alterations and modi?cations as fall within
`the true spirit and scope of the invention.
`What is claimed is:
`1. A pedometer, comprising:
`an output means to communicate numbers to a user;
`a switching means to select among a plurality of func
`tions and to set a plurality of event values;
`at least one memory to store an event;
`a computing means for calculating the activity of the
`user from an output pulse stream from an accelera
`tion ?eld detection means for detecting motions of
`the user;
`an enclosure comprising a housing with an attached
`flip open door, said ?ip open door having a means
`to reduce the sensitivity of said acceleration ?eld
`detection means; and
`‘
`a calibration means for accurately correlating the
`acceleration ?eld detection means output to activi
`ties of a user, the calibration means able to count
`the total number of output pulses from the acceler
`ation ?eld detection means and to thereafter use
`said total as being equal to a fraction of a standard
`unit of measure, the calibration means able to di
`vide said output pulses by a number.
`2. A pedometer of claim 1, wherein:
`the calibration means comprises a step counter and a
`step memory, said step memory containing a value
`equal to a sub-multiple of a value contained in said
`step counter during a calibration period.
`3. The pedometer of claim 1, wherein:
`the output means comprises a liquid crystal display.
`4. The pedometer of claim 1, wherein:
`the switching means comprises a plurality of push
`buttons located next to the output means.
`5. The pedometer of claim 1, wherein:
`there are seven memories _used to store trip events.
`6. The pedometer of claim 5 wherein:
`
`5,117,444
`8
`the memories used to store trip events are semicon
`ductor memories used in association with a mi
`crocomputer.
`7. The pedometer of claim 1, wherein:
`the computing means comprises a microcomputer
`having a CPU, a RAM, a ROM, and an input/out
`put port.
`8. The pedometer of claim 1, wherein:
`said acceleration ?eld detection means comprises at
`least one integrated circuit accelerometer.
`9. The pedometer of claim 8, wherein:
`each said accelerometer is sensitive to a different
`plane of acceleration in space.
`10. The pedometer of claim 1, wherein:
`said acceleration ?eld detection means comprises a
`weighted pendulum.
`11. The pedometer of claim 1, wherein said enclosure
`suitable for wearing on a user’s belt.
`12. The pedometer of claim 11,'wherein:
`said flip open door comprises a detachable belt clip.
`13. The pedometer of claim 1, further comprising:
`an enclosure suitable for wearing on a user’s wrist,
`said enclosure having a wrist strap.
`14. The pedometer of claim 10, wherein said means
`for reducing the sensitivity of said acceleration ?eld
`detection means comprises a tongue which partially
`restricts said weighted pendulum when said door is
`open.
`15. A method of calibrating a pedometer, comprised
`of the following steps:
`attaching said pedometer to a user in the manner in
`which it will be attached for normal use;
`enabling the entry of the pedometer into a calibration
`mode;
`travelling a predetermined unit of distance while said
`pedometer is attached and enabled for calibration;
`detecting a number of movements of a user wearing
`the pedometer while travelling said predetermined
`distance;
`dividing the number of movements by a number
`whereby units displayed on an output device will
`have a correct relationship to a known unit of dis
`tance and a distance subsequently traveled after
`calibration is complete;
`-
`storing said divided number of movements in at least
`one memory device; and
`ending said calibration mode.
`16. The method of claim 15, wherein said predeter
`mined unit of distance is equal to half the unit that is to
`be displayed.
`17. The method of claim 15, wherein said number
`used as a divisor is equal to ?ve, whereby said pedome
`ter is able to determine distance in terms of tenths of
`said predetermined unit distance.
`‘ i i i i
`
`is
`
`20
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1016, Page 8 of 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket