throbber
Thomas P. Blackadar
`
`Boston, MA
`
`6/27/2018
`Page 1 (1)
`
` 1 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` 2 BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` Case IPR2017-02023
`
` Patent 6,434,212
`
` 6 TOMTOM, INC., and TOMTOM )
`
` 7 INTERNATIONAL, B.V., )
`
` 8 Petitioners, )
`
` 9 vs. )
`
` 10 BLACKBIRD TECH LLC, d/b/a )
`
` 11 BLACKBIRD TECHNOLOGIES, )
`
` 12 Patent Owner.
`
` 13
`
` 14
`
` 15 DEPOSITION OF THOMAS P. BLACKADAR
`
` 16 WEDNESDAY - JUNE 27, 2018
`
` 17 9:25 A.M. - 2:22 P.M.
`
` 18
`
` 19
`
` 20 PEPPER HAMILTON LLP
`
` 21 125 HIGH STREET
`
` 22 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS
`
` 23
`
` 24 Reported by: Dawn Mack-Boaden, RPR
`
` 25
`
`1-800-FOR-DEPO
`
`www.AldersonReporting.com
`
`Alderson Court Reporting
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1022, Page 1 of 47
`
`

`

`Thomas P. Blackadar
`
`Boston, MA
`Page 2
`
`6/27/2018
`Page 2 (2 - 5)
`Page 4
`
` 1 APPEARANCES
`
` 2
` 3 ON BEHALF OF THE PATENT OWNER,
` 4 BLACKBIRD TECH LLC, d/b/a BLACKBIRD TECHNOLOGIES:
` 5 Walter D. Davis, Jr., Esquire
` 6 Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey LLP
` 7 8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 500
`
` 8 McLean, Virginia 22102
` 9 (571) 765-7709
`10 wdavis@dbjg.com
`
`11
`12 ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS, TOMTOM, INC., and
`13 TOMTOM INTERNATIONAL, B.V.:
`14 Dipu A. Doshi, Esquire
`15 BLANK ROME LLP
`16 1825 Eye Street NW
`
`17 Washington, D.C. 20006
`18 (202) 420-2604
`19 ddoshi@blankrome.com
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` 1 P-R-O-C-E-E-D-I-N-G-S
` 2
` 3 THOMAS P. BLACKADAR, a witness first
` 4 having been satisfactorily identified by the
` 5 production of his Massachusetts driver's
` 6 license, was sworn and testified as follows:
` 7
` 8 DIRECT EXAMINATION
` 9 BY MR. DAVIS:
`10 Q. Good morning, Mr. Blackadar.
`11 A. Good morning.
`12 Q. So we met each other earlier. I'm Walter
`13 Davis. It's nice to meet you.
`14 Do you understand that you're here to
`15 provide testimony related to a particular -- an IPR?
`16 A. Yes.
`17 Q. And that's IPR 2017-02023. That's the
`18 number.
`19 Could you state your name for the record.
`20 A. Thomas Blackadar.
`21 Q. And, Mr. Blackadar, have you ever had your
`22 deposition taken before?
`23 A. I have.
`24 Q. How many times?
`25 A. Twice.
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 5
` 1 Q. Twice. Okay. What were those two times?
` 2 A. One was Nike v. Adidas, and the other one
` 3 was Reebok v. FitSense; and that was a contract
` 4 matter, the second one.
` 5 Q. I'll get to that in a second.
` 6 So the Nike v. Adidas, what kind of case
` 7 was that?
` 8 A. They were -- Nike was suing or whatever,
` 9 infringement -- infringement suing, I guess is the
`10 word -- it was back in 2006 -- on a patent that I
`11 had sold to Nike, and so I was being interviewed
`12 about that.
`13 Q. Okay. So you were deposed as a fact
`14 witness?
`15 A. Uh-huh.
`16 Q. And when did you say that was?
`17 A. I believe it was 2006.
`18 Q. And the Reebok v. FitSense. FitSense:
`19 That's your company?
`20 A. That was my company. I was CEO.
`21 Q. That was your company. And that was --
`22 that was a contract dispute, you said?
`23 A. It was.
`24 Q. And when was that deposition?
`25 A. I'm going to say it was somewhere right
`Alderson Court Reporting
`
` 1 INDEX
` 2 EXAMINATION PAGE
` 3 THOMAS P. BLACKADAR
` 4 By Mr. Davis 4
` 5 By Mr. Doshi 111
` 6
`
` 7
` 8 EXHIBIT INDEX
` 9 NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE
`10 1021: Curriculum Vitae 12
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`1-800-FOR-DEPO
`
`www.AldersonReporting.com
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1022, Page 2 of 47
`
`

`

`Thomas P. Blackadar
`
`Boston, MA
`Page 6
`
`6/27/2018
`Page 3 (6 - 9)
`Page 8
`
` 1 around 2000.
` 1 provide truthful testimony today?
` 2 Q. Somewhere around 2000?
` 2 A. There's no reason.
` 3 A. Yeah.
` 3 Q. That's the answer I would expect. One
` 4 Q. Okay. So it's been quite some time
` 4 thing -- and I'm not sure -- you may or may not be
` 5 since --
` 5 aware of this, but one of the rules associated with
` 6 A. Yes.
` 6 IPRs in general, but certainly this IPR specifically
` 7 Q. -- your last deposition, bottom line.
` 7 too, is when we take breaks, certainly you're going
` 8 I'll try to make this as painless as
` 8 to be talking with your attorney, but the one thing
` 9 possible today. Since it has been some time since
` 9 you can't talk about is the substance of your
`10 your last deposition, I want to go over a few of
`10 testimony unless there is an outstanding question
`11 just the basic rules, which I'm sure your attorney
`11 about attorney-client privilege, which I doubt there
`12 did as well.
`12 will be in this case. Does that make sense?
`13 So we're here today; essentially, today's
`13 A. Yes.
`14 procedure is going to be a question and answer
`14 Q. I have this little --
`15 session. I'm going to ask you questions, and, you
`15 MR. DOSHI: We can agree to that.
`16 know, you'll provide me with answers to the best of
`16 BY MR. DAVIS:
`17 your ability.
`17 Q. There's a little rule here, but I don't --
`18 One thing when you provide answers, please
`18 this is not an exhibit. I just wanted to make sure
`19 make sure that they're audible so that the court
`19 that you understood that so that there's no
`20 reporter can understand. And that means in two
`20 confusion.
`21 ways. 1. Certainly speak up; but it also means to
`21 A. It was explained to me by my attorney.
`22 do more than simply nod or shake your head.
`22 Q. Great. I thought it might be.
`23 Actually say what -- what the answer is.
`23 Mr. Blackadar, what did you do to prepare
`24 And sometimes that gets tough because
`24 for your testimony today?
`25 that's not necessarily the way that we talk to each
`25 A. I -- it's been a year since I -- almost a
`Page 9
`Page 7
` 1 other as people. But we'll get used to it. Maybe
` 1 year since I did the declaration. And so I -- last
` 2 that's unfortunate, but we will.
` 2 week when we understood that there was a date, I
` 3 Let's try not to talk over each other.
` 3 went through and -- all of the literature, the court
` 4 Again, sometimes that also gets tough because when
` 4 documents, everything that's happened since last
` 5 you have a conversation, that naturally happens; but
` 5 year, and re-reviewed the patents. And yesterday I
` 6 let's try to do a good job of not talking over each
` 6 met with Dipu to just go over and prep for this
` 7 other. And that goes for me as well.
` 7 meeting.
` 8 We can and will -- we will take several
` 8 Q. Okay. And when you say you went over the
` 9 breaks throughout the course of today's session.
` 9 materials, did that include -- that includes the
`10 Typically, I like to take breaks about every hour.
`10 petition?
`11 If for some reason you need a break before that,
`11 A. Yes.
`12 please let me know, and we'll take a break. The one
`12 Q. Your declaration?
`13 thing that I would ask is if I have an outstanding
`13 A. Yes.
`14 question, answer it before we actually take a break.
`14 Q. The prior art you cited in your
`15 Okay?
`15 declaration?
`16 A. Okay.
`16 A. Yes.
`17 Q. And we've already -- try as I may, my
`17 Q. Does it include Blackbird's preliminary
`18 questions are not always perfectly phrased, and I'm
`18 response?
`19 sure your attorney will have something to say about
`19 A. Yes.
`20 that if they are really bad.
`20 Q. Does it include the institution's decision
`21 That said, if you don't understand a
`21 by the board?
`22 question of mine, please let me know, and I'll try
`22 A. Yes.
`23 to reform it in a way that's more understandable.
`23 Q. Okay. Are there any other big ticket items
`24 Is there any reason, whether that be
`24 that I'm missing?
`25 sickness or otherwise, that you won't be able to
`25 Well, if there are any that are relevant,
`Alderson Court Reporting
`
`1-800-FOR-DEPO
`
`www.AldersonReporting.com
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1022, Page 3 of 47
`
`

`

`Thomas P. Blackadar
`
`6/27/2018
`Page 4 (10 - 13)
`Page 12
`
`Boston, MA
`Page 10
` 1 I'm sure they'll come up in the course of questions.
` 2 But it includes at least --
` 3 A. Yes.
` 4 Q. At least those documents; right?
` 5 And when you met with your attorney, that
` 6 was just yesterday?
` 7 A. Yes.
` 8 Q. And how long did you meet?
` 9 A. Probably five to six hours.
`10 Q. Okay. How long in total, including the
`11 meeting yesterday, would you say you spent preparing
`12 for today's deposition?
`13 A. Sixteen hours.
`14 Q. Sixteen hours.
`15 A. Just shy. Good enough.
`16 Q. Pretty precise. Okay. Mr. Blackadar, this
`17 is -- for our purposes and the court reporter's
`18 purposes, most of the exhibits already have exhibit
`19 numbers from the IPR. So we're not going to need to
`20 mark most of them. There may be one or two. Okay.
`21 So I'm going to hand you a copy of your
`22 declaration, which is Exhibit 1005.
`23 MR. DAVIS: I have a copy here if you
`24 want it or you can just use --
`25 MR. DOSHI: I'll just use mine.
`
` 1 and we can go from there.
` 2 MR. DAVIS: I'll take copies. I have --
` 3 that will probably be easier. I have copies
` 4 of his CV from another IPR that you did
` 5 earlier in 2017, but if your attorney has
` 6 copies that we already know to be accurate,
` 7 then let's take those.
` 8 MR. DOSHI: Okay. Do you want to mark
` 9 these?
`10 MR. DAVIS: Yes.
`11 ***************************************
`12 (Exhibit Number 1021 was marked for
`13 identification.)
`14 ***************************************
`15 BY MR. DAVIS:
`16 Q. Mr. Blackadar, you have in front of you
`17 what has been marked as Exhibit 1021. Is this your
`18 current CV?
`19 A. Yes, sir.
`20 Q. Current as of today?
`21 A. Yes, sir.
`22 Q. Okay. Looking at your CV, I see you have a
`23 BS in electrical engineering and computer science
`24 from the University of New Hampshire?
`25 A. Yes, sir.
`
`Page 11
`
`Page 13
` 1 Q. With a concentration of biomedical and a
` 1 MR. DAVIS: Okay.
` 2 minor in history; is that right?
` 2 BY MR. DAVIS:
` 3 A. Yes, sir.
` 3 Q. This is your declaration, correct,
` 4 Q. Did any of your studies relate to motion
` 4 Exhibit 1005?
` 5 tracking, motion analysis, or inertial sensing?
` 5 A. Yes, it is.
` 6 A. My physics courses taught me about inertial
` 6 Q. And if we could turn to -- it's page 4,
` 7 navigation. That's it.
` 7 Paragraph 3.
` 8 Q. Is that it?
` 8 A. Page?
` 9 A. Yes.
` 9 Q. It's Paragraph 3 of your declaration, which
`10 Q. How about -- how about signal analysis?
`10 is on page 4. It's page 4 of 87, but then there are
`11 A. Many courses on signal analysis from
`11 also paragraph numbers.
`12 communications to acoustics, and I took a course on
`12 A. Okay. Here we go.
`13 signal to noise.
`13 Q. So the first sentence there indicates that
`14 Q. That's a pretty good memory.
`14 your CV is attached as Attachment A to the
`15 A. Yeah.
`15 declaration.
`16 Q. I don't think I could recite many of the
`16 A. Yes.
`17 courses I took in college.
`17 Q. And I didn't actually see your CV attached
`18 So -- sorry?
`18 to the declaration in just flipping through it.
`19 A. No. I think that's it.
`19 But -- go ahead.
`20 Q. Okay.
`20 MR. DOSHI: It was inadvertently
`21 A. Probably a few more that I'm missing.
`21 admitted from the exhibit.
`22 Q. The first -- looking at your work
`22 MR. DAVIS: I understand, and I'm not
`23 experience now, the first item that you have going
`23 making a big deal out of it.
`24 all the way back is BBN Computer Company from 1982
`24 MR. DOSHI: I do have copies if you want
`25 to '86.
`25 them now, or you can just ask him questions
`Alderson Court Reporting
`
`1-800-FOR-DEPO
`
`www.AldersonReporting.com
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1022, Page 4 of 47
`
`

`

`Thomas P. Blackadar
`
`Boston, MA
`Page 14
`
`6/27/2018
`Page 5 (14 - 17)
`Page 16
`
` 1 A. Yes, sir.
` 2 Q. Where you were a senior -- a test engineer?
` 3 A. Yes, sir.
` 4 Q. And did any of your work experience there
` 5 have to do with motion tracking, motion analysis, or
` 6 inertial sensing?
` 7 A. At BBN at the computer company as a test
` 8 engineer, no.
` 9 Q. Okay. And how about signal analysis?
`10 A. Yes.
`11 Q. In what sense for signal analysis?
`12 A. There is a technique in troubleshooting and
`13 developing test fixtures that one would actually
`14 inject signals into a circuit card and then read
`15 them back.
`16 It has evolved since 1983/'84 into a fairly
`17 large industry, and they call it Quinepro.
`18 Q. And moving -- moving on up to BBN Advanced
`19 Computers from 1986 to 1991, director of operations.
`20 What did you do as director of operations
`21 at BBN Advanced Computers?
`22 A. I ran the support group, the manufacturing
`23 group, and sustaining engineer group. That was my
`24 final position at BBN Advanced Computers.
`25 I started off as a -- just a systems
`
`Page 15
`
` 1 A. Yes.
` 2 Q. In what sense?
` 3 A. One of the DARPA projects that we did was
` 4 called the personal inertia navigation system where
` 5 we measured -- put sensors on the body, in
` 6 particular on the leg/ankle, and measured a person's
` 7 location in free space as they walked around a
` 8 building. We telemetered it back to a map, and we
` 9 were able to effectively follow somebody in a
`10 building from outside the building and know which
`11 floor they were on, which stairwell they were in,
`12 all by an inertial navigation system.
`13 Q. And when was that DARPA project?
`14 A. That was '95 through '97.
`15 Q. Okay.
`16 A. Dr. Lawrence Sheer was my program manager
`17 for that -- well, project engineer -- my Ph.D. doing
`18 it.
`19 Q. Anything else provide -- during that time
`20 period as the advanced network department manager,
`21 did anything else provide you with experience in
`22 motion tracking, motion analysis, or inertial
`23 sensing?
`24 A. Yes. There was a counter sniper program
`25 which was effectively using -- detecting where a
`Page 17
`
` 1 engineer and then worked my way on up.
` 2 Q. And did any of that work experience as just
` 3 for this entry, the director of operations, provide
` 4 you with experience in motion tracking, motion
` 5 analysis, or inertial sensing?
` 6 A. No, sir.
` 7 Q. How about signal analysis?
` 8 A. Just as it pertained to debugging hardware.
` 9 Q. Okay. Your next experience at BBN it says
`10 BBN Technologies Advanced Networking Department
`11 Manager, '91 to '97.
`12 And what did you do as the advanced
`13 networking department manager?
`14 A. I did all of the -- I was in charge of all
`15 of the manufacturing for all of BBN, sustaining the
`16 support group, sustaining the products in the field,
`17 and running the advanced networking group; and most
`18 of that was consulting work for the Defense Advanced
`19 Research Projects Agency.
`20 I wrote proposals, architected crafty
`21 things that we thought DARPA might want, and
`22 delivered on it.
`23 Q. And did any of that provide you with
`24 experience in motion tracking, motion analysis, or
`25 inertial sensing?
`
` 1 shot came from using acoustic waveforms,
` 2 triangulation, and then trajectory.
` 3 Q. Okay. Other than the DARPA project and the
` 4 sniper project, was there anything else in that time
` 5 frame as the advanced networking department manager
` 6 that provided you experience in motion tracking,
` 7 motion analysis, or inertial sensing?
` 8 A. Not that I can recall.
` 9 Q. Okay.
`10 A. I do recall there was one other one. It
`11 was a project out of the U.S. ARIEM, the Army
`12 Research Institute for Environmental Medicine.
`13 We worked for -- did a project to harden
`14 one of Dr. Hoyt's -- who was the inventor -- shoe
`15 sensors to measure a person as they were walking;
`16 measuring the contact time on the ground. So we did
`17 a hardened sensor for him.
`18 Q. And when was that?
`19 A. 1996. Completed it in June.
`20 MR. DOSHI: Can you repeat back the
`21 answer before that one.
`22 ***************************************
`23 (The answer was read back as follows:
`24 "I do recall there was one other one. It
`25 was a project out of the U.S. ARIEM, the
`Alderson Court Reporting
`
`1-800-FOR-DEPO
`
`www.AldersonReporting.com
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1022, Page 5 of 47
`
`

`

`Thomas P. Blackadar
`
`6/27/2018
`Page 6 (18 - 21)
`Page 20
` 1 Q. All right. And what do you mean by contact
` 2 time from on top of the foot?
` 3 A. With Dr. Hoyt, we had actually done contact
` 4 time under the foot, right, which is the traditional
` 5 way; and I wanted --
` 6 Q. That was the hardened --
` 7 A. Yes.
` 8 Q. -- sensor?
` 9 A. Yes, sir.
`10 Q. Okay.
`11 A. And so on top of the foot, could I get the
`12 reflective waveform which -- of the -- of the foot
`13 contact time by seeing the force hit the ground, and
`14 would the accelerometer provide me information on
`15 doing that.
`16 Q. What's an accelerometer?
`17 A. An accelerometer is anything from a
`18 pendulum which is -- reacts to the forces of gravity
`19 and/or motion.
`20 And so, typically -- now -- today they're
`21 all silicon devices. There were only a few back in
`22 1997. And prior to that, they were inertial devices
`23 with springs or pendulums and stuff that would
`24 actually be calibrated to work against the forces of
`25 gravity.
`
`Boston, MA
`Page 18
` 1 Army Research Institute for Environmental
` 2 Medicine. We worked for -- did a project to
` 3 harden one of Dr. Hoyt's -- who was the
` 4 inventor -- shoe sensors to measure a person
` 5 as they were walking; measuring the contact
` 6 time on the ground. So we did a hardened
` 7 sensor for him.")
` 8 ***************************************
` 9 BY MR. DAVIS:
`10 Q. And you said hardened sensor. What's a
`11 hardened sensor?
`12 A. Dr. Hoyt wanted a -- hardened sensor means
`13 that you could put it under your foot and step on
`14 it.
`15 Q. Okay.
`16 A. So, yeah, there's very -- there's several
`17 meanings of hardened, but that one was we put it in
`18 the aluminum case, then brought the pressure sensors
`19 out and put them inside.
`20 Q. You were at BBN from 1982 to 1997; correct?
`21 A. Correct.
`22 Q. And then after that, you started a company
`23 called FitSense Technology?
`24 A. Yes, sir. The first incorporation was
`25 Personal Electronic Devices, Incorporated. We
`Page 19
` 1 changed the name in 1998 towards the end of the
` 1 Q. What do you mean by calibrated?
` 2 year, as per my board of advisors' recommendation.
` 2 A. In this sense, you need to understand --
` 3 MR. DAVIS: Could you repeat that
` 3 you need to actually design and build a -- if we're
` 4 answer, please.
` 4 doing a spring tension one, you have to put the
` 5 ***************************************
` 5 right amount of force on the right amount of mass.
` 6 (The answer was read back as follows:
` 6 So this all goes back to physics.
` 7 "Yes, sir. The first incorporation was
` 7 But, basically, that's what I mean by
` 8 Personal Electronic Devices, Incorporated.
` 8 calibrate in that instance. You have to actually,
` 9 We changed the name in 1998 towards the end
` 9 you know, design it such that it works and the
`10 of the year, as per my board of advisors'
`10 calibration is in the design.
`11 recommendation.")
`11 Q. The technology that's on top of the foot,
`12 ***************************************
`12 how did you refer to it again?
`13 BY MR. DAVIS:
`13 A. The accelerometer on top of the foot.
`14 Q. How large was your board of advisors?
`14 Q. Yeah; the accelerometer on top of the foot.
`15 A. It was three people: Michael Holly,
`15 A. I was looking for the reflective footstep,
`16 Charlie Layton, Tom Stark.
`16 if that's -- the reflective force signal from the
`17 Q. And when you started your company -- your
`17 footstep.
`18 CV says you started the company in your basement.
`18 Q. What's the reflective force signal?
`19 Was it just -- was it originally just you?
`19 A. The reflective force signal is the heel
`20 A. It was. When BBN was sold in January of
`20 down, toe off signal. It's a waveform.
`21 1997, I went out and wanted to see if I could
`21 Q. Okay.
`22 achieve getting contact time from on top of the
`22 A. One must do signal analysis to understand
`23 foot.
`23 what the signal looks like.
`24 I, at that time, said if I can do this, I
`24 Q. And that's -- what other technology did you
`25 can get a patent for this; I can start a business.
`25 work on at FitSense, if any?
`Alderson Court Reporting
`
`Page 21
`
`1-800-FOR-DEPO
`
`www.AldersonReporting.com
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1022, Page 6 of 47
`
`

`

`Thomas P. Blackadar
`
`6/27/2018
`Page 7 (22 - 25)
`Page 24
`
`Boston, MA
`Page 22
` 1 A. Low-power wireless technology, heart rate
` 2 technology, GPS technology, pulse oximetry,
` 3 telephony.
` 4 Q. Anything else?
` 5 A. Cloud server applications, fitness
` 6 applications, employee wellness programs, access
` 7 points, multiple activity monitors, children shoe
` 8 games, watches, watch network products, and fitness
` 9 gym radio communications to treadmills and the like.
`10 Q. I guess you were busy.
`11 A. Good part of in my life.
`12 Q. Pulse oximetry. That was the only term I
`13 think I didn't really --
`14 A. Didn't know it?
`15 Q. I didn't know it.
`16 A. That's -- you've seen the finger monitors
`17 that say your -- it's, again, doing the waveform and
`18 analysis on that.
`19 Q. Okay. That was my guess, but I wasn't --
`20 that's all it was. So FitSense Technology from 1997
`21 to 2007.
`22 And on your CV going further up is FitLinxx
`23 from 2007 to 2015. Could you -- what happened
`24 there? FitLinxx was a separate company that merged
`25 with FitSense; is that right?
`
` 1 let's go back first to FitSense Technology.
` 2 A. Sure.
` 3 Q. You filed patent applications prior to
` 4 FitLinxx; correct?
` 5 A. Yes, sir. So it was the second. 1997 was
` 6 my first patent application. I was involved in four
` 7 other patent applications, though not a named
` 8 inventor on the patents, back at BBN.
` 9 Q. Okay.
`10 A. But I was -- as the project manager, I had
`11 to help push and translate the science with the
`12 patent attorneys over at Hale & Dorr.
`13 Q. Do you know whether or not those BBN patent
`14 applications actually became patents?
`15 A. I know that one of them did not, and I know
`16 that three of them did.
`17 Q. Okay. The three that did, what, generally,
`18 did they relate to?
`19 A. Low-power wireless technology.
`20 The one that didn't was involved with
`21 personal inertial navigation.
`22 And there's a Richardson patent in 1974
`23 that predated it and predates most or the art --
`24 Q. Okay.
`25 A. -- that people are using today.
`
`Page 25
`Page 23
` 1 Q. Okay. So, FitLinxx, you said that they --
` 1 A. Yeah; they were about four times bigger
` 2 they sold the company in 2015 or 2016 --
` 2 than us, but we did a radio project with them
` 3 A. That's when the -- that's when the letter
` 3 because they were doing the fitness equipment in the
` 4 of intent, all the terms were set, and then it just
` 4 gyms. I was doing, at that point in time, employee
` 5 took its business cycle. I left in August.
` 5 wellness programs.
` 6 Q. And -- and, at that point, you became a
` 6 And that market was just starting off and
` 7 full-time consultant?
` 7 we were going -- I could see that it was going to
` 8 A. I formed FitSense Technology Limited
` 8 take a while for us to get there; and with a bigger
` 9 Liability Corporation.
` 9 brother, we would end up having a better chance of,
`10 Q. Okay.
`10 you know, growing and get more funding without
`11 A. They gave me the name. I took it.
`11 having to go out to the VCs. And it was a really
`12 Q. Okay. Fit --
`12 nice merger.
`13 A. Because of the --
`13 In 2015, they sold the company -- the
`14 Q. FitSense gave you your name back,
`14 transaction actually happened in 2016, but me being
`15 basically?
`15 an executive, I said, okay, I'm going to kick back
`16 A. They gave me my name back back in 2010.
`16 and relax; you don't need me here anymore.
`17 Q. Okay. And what consulting services have
`17 Q. I see under your FitLinxx entry that you
`18 you -- have you done as FitSense Technology, LLC?
`18 had two different positions: CEO and CTO?
`19 A. I have done consulting for three companies,
`19 A. Correct.
`20 one of them being ANGLER Tech; another, Shimmer
`20 Q. And as CTO, you, among other things,
`21 Research; and another, Third Pole Incorporated.
`21 provided new platform architectures and generated
`22 And I have done, as you have found, IPR
`22 over 15 new patent applications and established a
`23 consulting and such.
`23 successful licensing program?
`24 Q. Okay. With the IPR consulting, how many
`24 A. Yes.
`25 IPRs have you worked on?
`25 Q. With respect to the patent applications,
`Alderson Court Reporting
`
`1-800-FOR-DEPO
`
`www.AldersonReporting.com
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1022, Page 7 of 47
`
`

`

`Thomas P. Blackadar
`
`6/27/2018
`Page 8 (26 - 29)
`Page 28
`
`Boston, MA
`Page 26
` 1 A. I don't have the exact number, but let me
` 2 look here and I can probably -- I'd like to say it's
` 3 three. It might be four. I'd have to go back into
` 4 my records and look.
` 5 Q. There are at least these two. Well,
` 6 there's 2023 and 2025. 2025 was not instituted, but
` 7 you worked on that too.
` 8 A. Uh-huh.
` 9 Q. All right. So those two. Maybe a couple
`10 of other ones or --
`11 A. Can I refer to my phone?
`12 Q. It's not crucial.
`13 A. Okay.
`14 Q. So you don't need to refer to your phone.
`15 A. I've got my billing log on the phone and I
`16 could actually cull out all the clients.
`17 Q. Okay. Have you ever -- so that's IPR.
`18 Have you ever worked on -- as an expert on a patent
`19 infringement case?
`20 A. The Nike one I was to go to eastern court
`21 of -- the eastern court of Texas.
`22 Q. Eastern district?
`23 A. Eastern district.
`24 Q. Sure.
`25 A. And the night before I was getting on the
`Page 27
` 1 plane, they settled. I was well prepped, everything
` 2 else; but that would have been my only time to have
` 3 been on the witness stand.
` 4 Q. Believe me, that's better to get the call
` 5 before you're on the plane than after. And that has
` 6 happened to me while I'm on the plane.
` 7 A. I can imagine.
` 8 Q. Okay. The last entry here -- and this is
` 9 all background. The last entry here, Third Pole
`10 Therapeutics. What's that?
`11 A. It's a new medical device company. They
`12 hired me as a consultant to come in and look at
`13 their architecture and look at their team. And I
`14 had so much fun, they hired me.
`15 It is a Class II medical device. I did
`16 manage to get an accelerometer in the design, but
`17 it's just for orientation to tell if somebody tipped
`18 it over or dropped it.
`19 Q. What's a Class II medical device?
`20 A. Class II medical means it has to go through
`21 a pretty rigorous FDA. We will do a 510(k) filing,
`22 but it means that it's there to help save, preserve
`23 -- or preserve life.
`24 So what we do is it provides a therapeutic
`25 treatment for patients that cures them.
`
` 1 Q. That sounds great. Good luck.
` 2 You can put your CV aside. And if you
` 3 could put your declaration back in front of you.
` 4 And this is -- this is a copy of the
` 5 petition for this IPR.
` 6 A. Okay.
` 7 MR. DAVIS: Counsel, I assume you have
` 8 it?
` 9 MR. DOSHI: I do.
`10 MR. DAVIS: Okay.
`11 BY MR. DAVIS:
`12 Q. And you reviewed the petition when you were
`13 preparing for the deposition?
`14 A. Yes.
`15 Q. That's what you said.
`16 If you could turn to -- it's page -- now I
`17 see why you're confused on the pages for your
`18 declaration. So I'll go by paragraphs. Paragraph
`19 36 of your declaration.
`20 MR. DOSHI: So maybe we should just use
`21 page numbers and then the paragraph numbers.
`22 And we'll use these numbers.
`23 MR. DAVIS: The one in the middle of the
`24 page, the bottom -- bottom middle. Okay.
`25 As opposed to exhibit page. That's fine.
`
`Page 29
`
` 1 THE WITNESS: I'm on 15-36.
` 2 BY MR. DAVIS:
` 3 Q. Okay. So as your counsel suggested, I
` 4 think what we'll do when I'm directing you to
` 5 certain portions is I'll refer to the page number in
` 6 the middle at the bottom of the page there and also
` 7 the paragraph number.
` 8 And then in the petition, page 16 at the
` 9 top of the page, first paragraph. Are you there?
`10 A. I am here. I'm sorry.
`11 Q. Okay. So these paragraphs relate to the
`12 level of ordinary skill in the art. Do you see
`13 that?
`14 A. Yes, sir.
`15 Q. And the petition provides a definition for
`16 a person having ordinary skill in the art, and you
`17 also provide your opinion in terms of what a person
`18 having ordinary skill in the art would be.
`19 Your definition in Paragraph 36 appears to
`20 very slightly differ from the definition of level of
`21 ordinary skill in the art in the petition just in
`22 that -- I won't keep it as a surprise.
`23 So in the petition, there's an indication
`24 that a person having ordinary skill in the art of
`25 the '212 patent as of October 1998 would have been a
`Alderson Court Reporting
`
`1-800-FOR-DEPO
`
`www.AldersonReporting.com
`
`TomTom Exhibit 1022, Page 8 of 47
`
`

`

`Thomas P. Blackadar
`
`Boston, MA
`Page 30
` 1 person with a bachelor's degree in mechanical
` 2 engineering, electrical engineering, etc., etc.,
` 3 etc.
` 4 In your declaration, you do not provide the
` 5 qualifier of having that experience in education as
` 6 of October of 1998. Do you see that?
` 7 MR. DOSHI: Could you repeat that?
` 8 MR. DAVIS: That wasn't good.
` 9 Let me do it this way. It will be a bit
`10 longwinded, but it will be more clear.
`11 BY MR. DAVIS:
`12 Q. Mr. Blackadar, in Paragraph 36 of your
`13 declaration, you indicate that a person having
`14 ordinary skill in the art in the field of the '212
`15 patent would have been a person with a bachelor's
`16 degree in mechanical engineering, electrical
`17 engineering, or a similar field with at least two
`18 years of experience in motion tracking, motion
`19 analysis, inertial sensing, or signal analysis, or a
`20 person with a master's degree in mechanical
`21 engineering, electrical engineering, or a similar
`22 field with a specialization in motion tracking,
`23 motion analysis, inertial sensing, or signal
`24 analysis. Do you see that?
`25 A. I see that.
`
`6/27/2018
`Page 9 (30 - 33)
`Page 32
` 1 internet has made things much easier to get into the
` 2 game.
` 3 Q. In your opinion, would somebody today with
` 4 the lesser level of education and experience to
` 5 which you referred, would that person have enough
` 6 education and/or experience to be able to provide
` 7 informed opinions on the subject matter of your
` 8 declaration?
` 9 A. Not as I just described.
`10 Q. Could you explain that?
`11 A. I was thinking of my statement and -- where
`12 I just qualified somebody. I'm not sure they would
`13 have the analytical skills to do the anal

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket