throbber
HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF AUTOMOBILE NAVIGATION TECHNOLOGY
`
`Robert L. French
`Consultant
`3550 Rulen Street
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`
`Key developments relating to vehicle
`navigation are listed in Table 1, and are
`discussed by category below. Virtually
`all high-technology automobile navigation
`systems use on-board computers to inte-
`grate and automate two or more of these
`technologies to provide vehicle location,
`heading, routing, or step-by-step guid-
`ance. Subsequent sections describe system
`concepts and functions, and give examples
`of both early and
`emerging automobile
`navigation systems.
`
`Table I. Vehicle Navigation Developments
`
`DATE
`
`TECHNOLOGY
`
`<60 AD
`200-300
`1100-1200
`1906
`1910
`1940
`1964
`1966
`1971
`
`Odometer
`Differential Odometer
`Magnetic Compass
`Gyrocompass
`Programmed Routes
`Loran Positioning
`Satellite Positioning
`Proximity Beacon
`Map Matching
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Sophisticated automobile navi-
`gation systems are becoming feasible
`largely because of low-cost computer
`technology.
`Computer technology is
`used to add
`artificial intelligence
`to dead reckoning
`navigation tech-
`niques that have been around for
`as
`long as 2000 years, and to automate
`radio frequency navigation concepts
`dating back to WW-11.
`This paper
`outlines the history of
`navigation
`technologies applicable to automo-
`biles, and discusses their integra-
`tion in various systems approaches
`ranging from the mechanical
`route
`guides of the
`early 1900's to the
`high-technology systems now beginning
`to appear.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Navigation is an applied science that
`uses a variety of techniques and proce-
`dures to determine present position,
`heading, and/or direction and distance to
`a destination. For
`centuries, navigation
`technology centered on the use of celes-
`tial observations and compass readings to
`fix the position
`and set the course of
`ships at sea.
`Similar techniques were
`adapted for aircraft navigation, and were
`soon joined by
`radio direction finding,
`triangulation, inertial guidance, and
`satellite positioning systems.
`However, except for a brief period of
`activity starting around 1910, automobile
`navigation had received little attention
`compared to sea, air and space navigation
`prior to the recent flurry of engineering
`projects, concept car showings, and media
`reports. Recent
`developments include a
`pioneering map matching
`system that is
`already on the market in California, as
`well as Ford and
`Chrysler concept cars
`with satellite navigation. General Motors
`has recently launched institutional
`ad-
`vertising foretelling "electronic naviga-
`tion systems that tell you where you are
`and how to get where you're going." In
`addition, there are international develop-
`ments that, in some ways, outpace the
`domestic programs.
`
`CH2308-5/86/0000-0350 $1.00 Q 1986 IEEE
`
`DEAD RECKONING TECHNIQUES
`Dead reckoning is the process of
`determining a vehicle's location and head-
`tng relative to an initial position by
`integrating measured increments and direc-
`tions of travel. A vehicle's
`current
`position in rectangular (x,y) coordinates
`is given by
`+ Icos+(t)dt
`x = x.
`y = yo + jsin+(L)da
`( 2 )
`coordinates,
`where xo, y are the initial
`dL is the %ravel increment, and +(L) is
`the vehicle heading associated with the
`distance increment.
`Most dead reckoning technologies used
`in automobile navigation systems were
`developed long before the
`automobile
`itself. These include the odometer, the
`magnetic
`and the
`differential odometer
`350
`
`(1)
`
`I
`
`IPR2017-02022
`Unified EX1013 Page 1
`
`

`

`The gyrocompass, developed in
`compass.
`in
`1906, has seen only limited usage
`automobile systems.
`Odometer
`Descriptions of odometers started
`appearing in both
`western and Chinese
`literature approximately 2000 years ago
`(1). One early model described by Hero of
`Alexandria recorded distance travelled by
`dropping a
`stone into a receptacle at
`periodic intervals. An early
`Chinese
`odometer struck a drum at distance inter-
`vals of approximately 500 yards, and rang
`a bell at every 10th interval.
`The odometer was the basis for a wave
`of mechanical road guides beginning around
`1910 as a proliferation of automobiles
`created a demand for routing information
`before adequate road signs and maps were
`generally available. Among the
`first was
`the Jones "Live Map" ( 2 ) . This mechanical
`road guide consisted of a turntable driven
`by a gear train and flexible shaft con-
`nected to one of the vehicle wheels.
`Individual routes were "programmed" on
`paper discs with a scale of miles printed
`around their perimeter. The
`discs were
`mounted on the turntable beneath a glass
`cover with a fixed
`pointer, and printed
`road
`directions
`keyed
`to
`specific
`distances from the beginning of the route
`came into view under the pointer at the
`time for execution.
`One of the most sophisticated mechan-
`ical route guides of the era was the
`Routes were
`Chadwick Road Guide ( 3 ) .
`programmed by holes punched in a metal
`disk, and signal arms and a bell
`were
`activated by the punched holes
`as each
`maneuver point was approached. One of ten
`signal arms bearing color-coded
`symbols
`indicating the action to be taken would
`appear behind a window and the bell would
`sound to attract the driver's attention.
`Conventional mechanical odometers for
`automobiles are usually driven by flexible
`shafts attached to the drive train, and
`display distances to the
`nearest 0.1
`mile. Electronic
`odometers, which can
`measure trave.1 increments as small as one
`inch, are often used in automobile naviga-
`tion systems. These provide
`sensor sig-
`nals from a rotating shaft or wheel and
`apply a
`conversion factor to obtain
`dlstance travelled.
`Differential Odometer
`A differential odometer is essen-
`tially a pair of odometers, one each for
`wheels paired on
`opposite sides of the
`vehicle. When the
`vehicle changes head-
`ing, the outer wheel travels further than
`the inner wheel by an amount (AD) that is
`
`change in
`equal to the product of the
`heading (A+) and the vehicle's width (W):
`AD = WA+.
`( 3 )
`Thus, by measuring the differential travel
`of opposite wheels, a vehicle's path and
`heading relative to its starting point may
`be computed using
`algorithms based on
`Equation 3 .
`The differential odometer principle
`was used in a direction-keeping device by
`the Chinese approximately 200 - 300 A.D.,
`perhaps earlier (1). The device was in
`the form of a horse-drawn two-wheel
`cart
`bearing a turntable-mounted statue with an
`outstretched arm. It
`was called the
`"south-pointing carriage" because the
`statue's arm always continued to point in
`its original direction regardless of which
`way the carriage turned as it travelled.
`When changing heading, a gear train driven
`by the
`south-pointing carriage's outer
`wheel automatically engaged and rotated
`the horizontal
`turntable (bearing the
`statue) to offset the vehicle's change in
`heading.
`The differential odometer was tested
`as a basis for automobile navigation by
`Meyer in 1971 ( 4 ) .
`He used the differen-
`tial odometer and a
`mechanical dead-
`reckoning computer to keep track of
`vehicle coordinates and heading.
`Test
`results indicated heading errors averaging
`approximately 20 degrees per mile
`of
`travel. At about the same time, French
`developed and tested an electronic version
`of the differential odometer in an auto-
`matic route guidance system which included
`a map-matching algorithm to maintain much
`higher accuracy (5).
`Magnetic Compass
`The magnetic compass's well-known
`accuracy problems due to anomalies in the
`earth's magnetic field become more severe
`when installed in an automobile because of
`induced fields depending upon vehicle
`heading. In addition, an automobile may
`have a permanent magnetic field of its
`own, and sub-permanent magnetism may be
`acquired or lost when hitting bumps.
`Nonetheless, magnetic compasses have
`long been used as heading indicators for
`automobiles, and modern versions of the
`compass are now
`frequently used as
`a
`component in integrated navigation systems
`for automobiles.
`Whereas the compass
`first appeared around the 11th century in
`the form of a magnetic needle floated on a
`current versions
`liquid surface ( 6 1 ,
`include compact solid state €lux-gate
`compasses with software algorithms for
`compensating errors due to both permanent
`and induced magnetism of the vehicle.
`
`IPR2017-02022
`Unified EX1013 Page 2
`
`

`

`a mag-
`Perhaps the earliest use of
`netic compass in an integrated vehicle
`system was the vehicular odograph, a self-
`contained navigation system for U. S. Army
`vehicles developed during WW-I1
`(7). An
`electro-mechanical system drove a stylus
`to automatically plot vehicle course on a
`map of corresponding scale.
`An odometer
`provided a distance input which was
`resolved into x,y components using servo-
`driven input from
`a photo-electrically-
`read magnetic compass.
`Gyrocompass
`The gyrocompass, which was. paf.ented
`in Germany in 1906 by Auschutz-Kampfe,
`uses the gyroscopic inertia principle to
`maintain a constant reference alignment in
`space. One of the few examples of the
`gyrocompass being incorporated in an
`automobile navigation system is the Lunar
`Roving Vehicle
`(LRV) used on the moon
`where a magnetic compass would be use-
`less. The
`LRV, driven on the moon's
`surface during Apollo Missions 15, 16, and
`17, had a dead reckoning navigation system
`which continuously measured direction and
`distance travelled, and periodically cal-
`culated vehicle position.
`Using gyro-
`compass reference heading
`and magnetic
`odometer inputs, the system could return
`the astronauts to within 100
`yards of
`their origin after a 20-mile journey ( 8 ) .
`MAP MATCHING TECHNIQUES
`Navigation of an automobile from one
`location to another differs considerably
`from sea and air navigation because the
`automobile is essentially constrained to a
`finite network of streets and roads. This
`makes it possible to apply artificial
`intelligence pattern recognition concepts
`to match a vehicle's dead reckoned course
`with a mathematically mapped route
`or
`route network to compensate dead reckoning
`error and to
`determine vehicle location
`with great accuracy.
`Map Mode 1 i ng
`Graph theory is used as a conceptual
`framework for mathematically modeling maps
`of roads and
`streets as internodal vec-
`tors. Each vector
`is the combination of
`distance and direction representing the
`road between two nodes defined
`by their
`coordinates.
`Thus, a particular route
`from a given initial location
`may be
`defined as a unique sequence of vectors.
`The most extensive
`body of
`vector-
`encoded map data
`is the GBF/DIME
`(Geo-
`graphic Base File/Dual Independent Map
`Encoding) System developed
`by the U. S.
`Census Bureau for virtually all Standard
`Metropolitan Statistical Areas
`(SMSA).
`
`GBF/DIME includes street names and address
`ranges between nodes, as well as a variety
`of information
`not relevant to vehicle
`navigation. Although
`a useful resourse,
`this map data base has numerous errors in
`segment connectivity, and represents the
`street network in 1977 (9).
`Since existing map data bases may not
`be used without extensive correction and
`revision, commercial map publishers are
`positioning to
`supply special map data
`(10). One
`bases for vehicular navigation
`automobile navigation systems company,
`Etak, Inc., has undertaken development of
`a special digital map data base €or the
`entire U.S. (11).
`Pattern Matching
`In map matching, the pattern of the
`vehicle's path is analyzed and defined as
`a sequence of vectors deduced from any of
`a variety of dead reckoning processes. As
`the vehicle travels, its measured vector
`sequence is continuously compared with the
`mapped vector sequence. Each time
`a turn
`is executed whose sense, magnitude, and
`location approximate those of a mapped
`turn, the vehicle is presumed to be at the
`mapped location. The matching
`process
`thus removes any dead reckoning
`error
`accumulated since the last turn.
`Vector map matching was demonstrated
`puter analyzed differential odometer sig-
`nals to deduce a delivery vehicle's path
`and match it with programmed routes.
`An
`average location accuracy of 4 feet was
`maintained during extensive testing of the
`map matching process.
`Error Compensation
`In addition to correcting dead rec-
`koning errors, map matching may be used to
`continuously fine tune differential odom-
`eter calibration factors used in computing
`distance increments (12). When an adjust-
`ment is necessary to make the perceived
`location of a turn conform with the pro-
`grammed location, the difference may be
`used to calculate revised calibration
`factors which are weighted
`and combined
`with the prior factors for subsequent use.
`RADIO FREQUENCY TECHNIQUES
`Numerous navigation schemes, includ-
`ing triangulation, phase and pulse trilat-
`eration, Loran, proximity
`beacons, and
`satellite approaches, involve the use of
`radio signals in determining position.
`The later two have received the most at-
`tention as the basis for vehicle location
`and
`navigation systems using
`radio
`signals.
`
`in 1971 by French ( 5 ) . An on-board com-
`
`352
`
`IPR2017-02022
`Unified EX1013 Page 3
`
`

`

`Proximity Beacon
`This approach uses strategically
`located short-range transmitters, and the
`very reception of their location-coded
`signals infers the receiving vehicle's
`instantaneous location, The widest appli-
`cation of proximity technology is for
`automatic vehicle location (AVL) monitor-
`ing systems such as those used for
`monitoring the
`location and status of
`from a central dispatch
`transit buses
`office (13). An on-board system receives
`and stores a location code as the vehicle
`passes a proximity beacon or "electronic
`signpost".
`Upon periodic polling, the
`last beacon location and the distance or
`time since passing the beacon are automat-
`ically radioed to the dispatch computer.
`Several variations of the proximity
`approach, some involving two-way communi-
`cations with equipped vehicles, have been
`investigated for interactive route guid-
`ance (14!. Typically, the driver enters a
`destination code on the vehicle panel for
`automatic transmission to a roadside unit
`as the vehicle approaches instrumented
`intersections. The
`roadside unit, which
`may operate autonomously, or be networked
`with a traffic management system, analyzes
`the destination code and instantly trans-
`mits route instructions for display on the
`vehicle's panel. Alternatively, the road-
`side unit may only transmit its location
`to the vehicle where an on-board computer,
`using stored road network
`data, will
`generate the route instructions from the
`identified location.
`
`Proximity beacon navigation was re-
`searched in the United
`States starting
`with DAIR in the mid-1960's. DAIR (Driver
`Aided Information and Routing System),
`which used roadbed
`arrays of magnets
`arranged in binary code to communicate
`location to passing vehicles, was the sub-
`ject of limited development and testing by
`General Motors (15). It
`was followed by
`ERGS (Electronic Route Guidance System), a
`Federal Highway Administration project of
`the late 1960's
`which promulgated radio
`communication between vehicle and roadside
`units (16). ERGS was discontinued in the
`early 1 9 7 0 ' ~ ~ largely because
`of the
`expensive infrastructure required, but
`similar approaches have subsequently been
`tested in West Germany and Japan.
`
`Satellite
`Satellite positioning has received
`considerable attention as a basis for
`automobile navigation systems. The
`"Transit" satellite system, which was
`implemented by the
`U. S . Navy in
`1964
`(17) , was the basis for the Ford "Concept
`100" car in 1983 (18). Transit receivers
`
`determine location by Doppler analysis of
`signals from a passing satellite.
`The
`satellites are in polar orbit at a height
`of approximately 1,000 kilometers, and are
`longitudinally spaced to give worldwide,
`although intermittent, coverage. Since a
`Transit satellite is not always in range,
`the Ford system included a dead-reckoning
`subsystem (based on odometer and magnetic
`compass inputs) for determining position
`between satellite passes. Selectable CRT
`displays showed vehicle heading, map
`location, etc.
`The Navstar Global Positioning System
`(GPS), which is still in the implementa-
`tion stage with the last of 18 satellites
`to be launched within the next few years
`(17), has been considered as a basis for
`automobile navigation by all of the major
`U.S. motor companies (18, 19, 20). When
`the satellite constellation is complete,
`any point on earth will always be within
`range of at least four Navstar satellites.
`A GPS receiver could determine its
`three position
`coordinates by analyzing
`the travel time of signals from only three
`satellites if the receiver's
`clock was
`precisely synchronized with the atomic
`clocks that time the
`satellite signals.
`However, given the timed signals from four
`satellites, the GPS receiver solves a
`uations for its three
`system of four e
`9
`s (P , Pyl Pz), and for
`position coordinat
`e
`the bias (CB) of
`i
`ts Tess precise quartz
`clock:
`(xl-Px)2+(Y1-Py) 2 +
`(x2-Px) 2 +(y2-Py) 2 +
`(x3-Px) 2 +(y3-Py) 2 +
`(x4-Px) 2 +(y4-Py)2+
`where x,, yn, zn, are position coordinates
`of the nth satellite based on ephemeris
`carried by its signal, and is the
`range
`to the nth satellite.
`Locations may thus be determined with
`an accuracy of approximately 50 feet using
`Navstar GPS P-Code signals intended for
`Department of Defense applications.
`Less
`precise C/A-Code signals intended for
`commercial use will permit location
`determination to within 300-500 feet.
`Although Navstar
`GPS will provide
`continuous coverage when the satellite
`constellation is completed, vehicle loca-
`tion determination may be impaired at
`times due to signal attenuation or reflec-
`tion by buildings, foliage, terrain
`features, etc. Therefore, as in the case
`of Transit, auxiliary dead reckoning is
`required for GPS automobile applications.
`
`353
`
`IPR2017-02022
`Unified EX1013 Page 4
`
`

`

`Other RF Techniques
`Of the various other radio-frequency
`based approaches that have been proposed
`or tested for vehicle location monitoring
`(21), Loran (Long RAnge Navigation) prob-
`ably has the most potential for automobile
`navigation because of its relatively wide
`coverage. Invented
`in 1940 by Loomis,
`Loran is a hyperbolic navigation system
`using multiple pairs
`of ground-based
`master-slave transmitters. U. S. coverage
`is complete along all coasts
`and most
`inland areas except for a band from Texas
`to North Dakota (22).
`a se-
`The master transmitter emits
`quence of electromagnetic pulses which are
`received by a widely separated slave sta-
`on a slightly
`tion and retransmitted
`different frequency. The Loran
`user’s
`receiver picks up both signals and anal-
`yses the difference in arrival time to
`establish a hyperbolic line-of-position
`associated with the time delay. Repeti-
`tion of the
`procedure for a different
`master-slave pair yields the longitude and
`latitude of the receiver at the intersec-
`tion of two hyperbolae.
`The availability of microprocessor-
`controlled receivers with improved per-
`formance at lower cost may make Loran C an
`attractive alternative to proximity beacon
`AVL in some cases (22, 23, 24). But Loran
`has not been pursued extensively as the
`basis for automobile navigation systems,
`perhaps due to incomplete
`geographic
`coverage as well as location inaccuracies
`typically on the order of 600 feet. One
`known use of Loran in a U.S. automobile is
`a General Motors test system which
`also
`includes GPS positioning (19). Loran is
`also used in
`a Nissan delivery vehicle
`navigation system currently being tested
`in Japan ( 2 5 ) .
`SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
`
`Navigation and positioning techniques
`outlined above may be integrated in vari-
`ous combinations for automobile
`systems
`providing a wide range of functions.
`Navigation Functions
`system func-
`Automobile navigation
`tions are broadly categorized according to
`whether they provide
`the driver with
`location information
`only, with other
`information useful in routing selection,
`or with explicit real-time route guidance.
`Location Vehicle location informa-
`tion has several possible forms.
`A
`is to indicate vehicle
`popular concept
`location by the position of a cursor on a
`map display panel. Another concept is to
`display street name and to give position
`
`in terms of address range or distance to
`the next
`cross street. Vehicle
`coordi-
`nates per se are generally not provided.
`Routinq A variety of other informa-
`tion may be useful to the vehicle driver
`in selecting a route to a particular dest-
`ination. Examples include vehicle head-
`ing, direction to destination, distance to
`destination, location of destination on
`map display, highlighted thoroughfares on
`map display, etc. An approach used in a
`few cases displays the route travelled to
`the present location by plotting it on a
`map.
`
`route guidance
`Guidance Real-time
`prompts the driver turn-by-turn over an
`appropriate route to his destination.
`Once the driver specifies destination and
`routing criteria
`(fastest, shortest,
`scenic, etc.) , the system makes all navi-
`gation decisions, freeing the driver to
`concentrate on driving safely. Explicit
`route guidance may
`be in
`the form of
`spoken instructions, displayed symbols
`(e.g., arrows shaped according to the
`maneuver), and/or displayed messages.
`System Concepts_
`of domestic
`Although the wide range
`and foreign systems approaches for auto-
`mobile navigation defies precise categori-
`zation, it is convenient to use the class-
`ifications characterized in Table I1 for
`discussing major system concepts.
`
`Table 11. Automobile Navigation Systems
`
`CLASSIFICATION
`
`TYPICAL CHARACTERISTICS
`
`Dead Reckoning
`Low Vehicular Expense
`Autonomous Operation
`Accuracy Degrades with Travel
`Requires Manual Updates
`Proximity Beacon
`Low to Moderate Vehicular Expense
`Requires Costly Roadway Equipment
`Dead Reckoning between Beacons
`Accuracy Updated at Beacons
`Satellite Positioninq
`High Vehicular Expense
`Requires Satellite Service
`High Accuracy when Reception Good
`Dead Reckoning Backup Required
`Map Matchins
`Moderate Vehicular Expense
`Requires Map Data Base
`High Accuracy when Map Correct
`Compensates Dead Reckoning Error
`
`354
`
`IPR2017-02022
`Unified EX1013 Page 5
`
`

`

`rechner" . The Nissan
`
`examples of
`Dead Reckoning Recent
`dead reckoning systems include the Nissan
`"Driver Guide", the Honda "Electro Gyro-
`Cater", and the
`Daimler-Benz "Routen-
`system (26) uses
`magnetic compass and odometer signals to
`continuously compute the distance and
`direction to a destination whose coordi-
`nates are input by the driver. A display
`comprised of an array of symbolic indica-
`tor lights shows the current direction to
`the destination, and a bar
`graph shows
`remaining distance.
`The Honda system (27) uses a helium
`gas-rate gyro and odometer to compute the
`vehicle's path relative to its starting
`point.
`The path is displayed on a CRT
`screen behind a transparent map overlay of
`appropriate scale. Provision is included
`for manually adjusting the map position to
`keep it in registration with vehicle path.
`The Daimler-Benz
`system has two
`modes, one for city and one for highway
`driving (28). When in the city mode, this
`system operates much like the Nissan sys-
`tem, using magnetic compass and odometer
`inputs to compute and display distance and
`direction to a driver-specified destina-
`tion.
`When in the highway
`mode, the
`system makes use of stored digital map
`data for the trunk highway network.
`The
`driver inputs both origin and destination,
`and the
`system computes the optimum
`highway route and prompts the driver step-
`by-step over the route.
`The next route
`point (entrance, exit, rest house, etc.)
`and its current distance is shown on a
`small alphanumeric display. Only odometer
`input is used in the highway mode, and the
`driver may manually correct any distance
`error when arriving at route points.
`Proximity Beacon This approach, now
`inactive in the U. S., has been the sub-
`ject of further development and testing in
`Japan and West Germany. The Japanese CACS
`(Comprehensive Automobile Traffic Control
`System) project (14) was essentially simi-
`lar to ERGS (16) with two-way communica-
`tions as equipped vehicles pass roadside
`units.
`CACS, which included
`linkage
`between the roadside units and a traffic
`control center for dynamic routing capa-
`bility, was tested extensively through
`large scale road and simulation experi-
`ments. Although the CACS project ended in
`1979, related studies have continued (291,
`and roadside units still have a potential
`role in advanced vehicle navigation
`systems now being planned in Japan (30).
`The West German
`ALI Destination
`Guidance System, designed primarily
`for
`freeway guidance, was developed
`by the
`Blaupunkt/Bosch group in the late 1970's
`(14). ALI uses induction loops at road
`intersections as a means of collecting
`
`data (type of car, speed destination,
`etc.)
`from equipped vehicles.
`The
`collected destination data are fed into a
`central
`computer
`where
`individually
`recommended routes are optimized with
`respect to current traffic situations.
`Route guidance information is then
`transmitted to individual vehicles and
`presented in visual form such as "turn
`left" or 'turn right". Although proven to
`work very well in a 1979-1982 field test
`covering about 150 km of the Autobahn
`network, ALI was not considered for
`general introduction because of the high
`cost of installing appropriate roadway
`infrastructure (31).
`Map Matchinq The first map matching
`system, an automatic route control system
`for delivery vehicles ( 5 1 , was limited to
`planned routes programmed before an
`equipped vehicle was dispatched. Route
`data tapes were prepared from central
`computer files, or by driving a route with
`an equipped vehicle to "record" the
`An on-board computer analyzed
`route.
`differential odometer signals, deduced the
`vehicle's path and compared it with the
`programmed path to maintain accuracy, to
`identify locations €or issuing route
`guidance to the driver, and to prompt the
`throwing of newspapers to subscriber
`houses included on the route tapes. Route
`guidance was initially accomplished
`by
`activating pre-recorded audio messages. A
`subsequent version used a plasma panel to
`display graphic instructions and explan-
`atory text (32). This system was in daily
`revenue service during a one year test by
`the F o r t Worth S t a r Telegram ( 3 3 ) .
`The first commercially available
`automobile navigation system based on map
`matching technology is the
`Etak "Navi-
`gator-'' marketed in the San Francisco and
`Los Angeles areas (the first areas with
`available map data) since 1985. The Etak
`system uses a flux-gate magnetic compass
`as well as differential odometry €or dead
`reckoning input, and uses tape cassettes
`The
`to store digital map data (11).
`system continuously displays the vehicle's
`location relative to its surroundings on a
`CRT map. A stationary arrowhead symbol in
`the center of the
`CRT represents the
`vehicle position, and points to the top of
`the display indicating vehicle heading.
`As the vehicle is driven, the map rotates
`and shifts about the fixed arrowhead
`accordingly. Input destinations are shown
`on the Etak screen as a flashing star.
`Map matching systems are also being
`developed by European developers using the
`compact disc for storage of massive map
`A pioneering
`AVL
`data bases ( 3 4 , 35).
`system for the St. Louis police fleet com-
`bined dead reckoning on the vehicles with
`map matching at the dispatch office (36).
`
`355
`
`IPR2017-02022
`Unified EX1013 Page 6
`
`

`

`The Navstar
`Satellite Positioning
`CLASS
`GPS system was the basis for
`Satellite
`(Chrysler Laser Atlas and
`System), a concept displayed at the 1984
`World's Fair in New Orleans ( 20). CLASS
`included a nationwide set of maps stored
`on video disc, and software for automat-
`ically selecting and displaying on a color
`CRT the map area incorporating the
`vehicle's current location as indicated by
`a cursor. Touch screen controls permitted
`the driver to input a destination or zoom
`in on a
`particular map area. Actual
`implementation of CLASS requires dead
`reckoning for navigating when signal
`reception is impaired by buildings,
`terrain features, etc.
`General Motors has experimented with
`GPS in an automobile system which includes
`Loran and dead reckoning (19). Ford
`has
`also considered GPS for automobile naviga-
`tion (18), and Rockwell International has
`outfitted a Collins shuttle bus with a GPS
`receiver coupled with
`an electronic map
`display (37). The bus location is indi-
`cated by a small white square on the CRT
`screen; when the vehicle is
`moving, the
`square moves across the map and leaves a
`blue trail
`to indicate the
`route trav-
`elled.
`Traffic Manaqement Automobile navi-
`gation systems with routing or guidance
`functions are potentially more useful if
`current information on traffic conditions
`is available for consideration in routing.
`Current information
`may be communicated
`with suitable data links so that routing
`and guidance generated by on-board systems
`can avoid congested areas, thus contribut-
`ing to balanced traffic management. Such
`communication links may also provide up-
`dates (new construction, detours, etc.) to
`digital map data bases used with automo-
`bile navigation systems.
`
`available,
`While the technology is
`the necessary coordination between govern-
`ment and industry to develop communica-
`tions standards and to implement and
`operate interactive traffic
`management
`systems has not been established in the
`U. S. (38). Both West Germany
`(31) and
`Japan (30), however, have formed working
`groups and committees involving road
`agencies, automobile manufacturers, elec-
`tronic device manufacturers, etc., to
`coordinate plans and standards for com-
`municating real-time traffic
`data and
`digital map updates to on-board systems.
`Interactive traffic
`management was
`recently studied by the COST 30 bis Work-
`ing Group 1 (Road/Vehicle Electronic Com-
`munication) of the OECD. The objective of
`the international group was to determine
`what aspects of a road-to-vehicle/vehicle-
`
`to-road electronic communication link
`should be standardized among European
`countries for traffic control and route
`guidance. The final report noted that the
`use of such communication links "could
`produce quantifiable benefits for drivers
`and for the community worth around €4,000
`m per year in Europe, " and recommended
`using area broadcasting
`techniques to
`transmit updates for "vehicle-borne navi-
`gation aids which should soon become
`available on the market" (39).
`CONCLUSIONS
`There are several viable technologies
`and systems approaches to high-technology
`automobile navigation, each having its own
`strengths and weaknesses. Although
`it is
`premature to conclude which combinations
`will prevail, trends are evident and major
`issues may be identified.
`One important trend
`is toward "map
`intelligent" systems that navigate
`by
`associating observed mathematical features
`of the vehicle path with those encoded in
`a map data base, analogous to the con-
`ventional driver who navigates by associ-
`ating observed landmarks and road features

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket