throbber
Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1169
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM
`
`
`
`Judge Robert W. Schroeder III
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`))))
`
`
`)
`
`)))))
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`MACROPOINT, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`
`Pursuant to Local Patent Rule (P.R.) 4-5(d) for the United States District Court for the
`
`Eastern District of Texas and the Court’s Docket Control Order, (Feb. 13, 2017, ECF No. 43),
`
`Plaintiff MacroPoint, LLC, (“MacroPoint”) and Defendant Ruiz Food Products, Inc. (“Ruiz
`
`Foods”) jointly submit this Joint Claim Construction Chart, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 2 of 17 PageID #: 1170
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 14, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Arthur P. Licygiewicz
`Arthur P. Licygiewicz (OH #0068458)
`THOMPSON HINE LLP
`3900 Key Center
`127 Public Square
`Cleveland, Ohio 44114
`Telephone:
`(216) 566-5500
`Facsimile:
`(216) 566-5800
`Art.Licygiewicz@thompsonhine.com
`
`Jeffrey C. Metzcar (OH #0072648)
`THOMPSON HINE LLP
`10050 Innovation Drive
`Suite 400
`Miamisburg, Ohio 45342
`Telephone:
`(937) 443-6841
`Facsimile:
`(937) 443-6635
`Jeff.Metzcar@thompsonhine.com
`
`Michael C. Smith (TX #18650410)
`SIEBMAN, BURG, PHILLIPS & SMITH, LLP
`113 East Austin Street
`P.O. Box 1556
`Marshall, TX 75671
`Telephone:
`(903) 938-8900
`Facsimile:
`(972) 767-4620
`michaelsmith@siebman.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`MacroPoint, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Mark Deming
`Gary E. Hood (IL # 6281580)
`Adam S. Weiss (IL # 6256842)
`Mark Deming (IL # 6299631)
`POLSINELLI PC
`150 N. Riverside Plaza
`Suite 3000
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone:
`(312) 819-1900
`Facsimile:
`(312) 819-1910
`ghood@polsinelli.com
`aweiss@polsinelli.com
`mdeming@polsinelli.com
`
`E. Glenn Thames, Jr. (TX # 00785097)
`POTTER MINTON P.C.
`110 N. College Avenue, Suite 500
`Tyler, TX 75702
`Telephone:
`(903) 597-8311
`Facsimile:
`(903) 593-0846
`glennthames@potterminton.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Ruiz Food Products, Inc.
`
`
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 3 of 17 PageID #: 1171
`Exhibit A – Joint Claim Construction Chart under P.R. 4-5(d)
`
` U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,275,358 and 9,429,659
`
`MacroPoint’s
`Proposed Construction
`identifying the mobile
`device after the telephone
`connection with the
`mobile device is initiated
`and before the
`connection ends
`
`Ruiz Foods’
`Proposed Construction
`No construction
`necessary; plain and
`ordinary meaning
`
`
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`Disputed Claim
`Term / Phrase
`’358 Patent, Claim 1:
`A computer implemented method for receiving
`consent from a user of a mobile device to
`obtaining location information of the mobile
`device, the method comprising:
`participating in a telephone call with the
`mobile device;
`within the telephone call, identifying the
`mobile device at least in part by obtaining an
`identifier associated with the mobile device;
`transmitting to the mobile device during the
`telephone call an automated voice message
`communicating to the user of the mobile
`device at least one of:
`a notice including information indicating that
`consenting to the obtaining of the location
`information of the mobile device would
`result in the location information of the
`mobile device being disclosed, and
`a location at which to find the notice,
`wherein the location at which to find the
`notice is represented by a web address
`corresponding to a website where, during
`the telephone call, the user can find the
`notice indicating to the user that consenting
`to the obtaining of the location information
`of the mobile device would result in the
`location information of the mobile device
`being disclosed; and
`receiving from the mobile device during the
`telephone call a signal including data
`
`1
`
`Page 3 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 4 of 17 PageID #: 1172
`Exhibit A – Joint Claim Construction Chart under P.R. 4-5(d)
`
` U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,275,358 and 9,429,659
`
`Disputed Claim
`Term / Phrase
`indicating consent for obtaining the location
`information of the mobile device.
`
`
`
`MacroPoint’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`Ruiz Foods’
`Proposed Construction
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`2
`
`Page 4 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 5 of 17 PageID #: 1173
`Exhibit A – Joint Claim Construction Chart under P.R. 4-5(d)
`
` U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,275,358 and 9,429,659
`
`Ruiz Foods’
`Proposed Construction
`No construction
`necessary; plain and
`ordinary meaning
`
`
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`MacroPoint’s
`Proposed Construction
`before the end of the
`telephone call, receiving
`from the mobile device
`one or more electrical or
`optical signals, analog or
`digital signals, data, one
`or more computer or
`processor instructions,
`messages, a bit or bit
`stream, or other means
`that can be received,
`transmitted or detected
`that signifies that consent
`to obtain the location
`information of the mobile
`device was granted
`
`Disputed Claim
`Term / Phrase
`’358 Patent, Claim 1:
`A computer implemented method for receiving
`consent from a user of a mobile device to
`obtaining location information of the mobile
`device, the method comprising:
`participating in a telephone call with the
`mobile device;
`within the telephone call, identifying the
`mobile device at least in part by obtaining an
`identifier associated with the mobile device;
`transmitting to the mobile device during the
`telephone call an automated voice message
`communicating to the user of the mobile
`device at least one of:
`a notice including information indicating that
`consenting to the obtaining of the location
`information of the mobile device would
`result in the location information of the
`mobile device being disclosed, and
`a location at which to find the notice,
`wherein the location at which to find the
`notice is represented by a web address
`corresponding to a website where, during
`the telephone call, the user can find the
`notice indicating to the user that consenting
`to the obtaining of the location information
`of the mobile device would result in the
`location information of the mobile device
`being disclosed; and
`receiving from the mobile device during the
`telephone call a signal including data
`
`3
`
`Page 5 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 6 of 17 PageID #: 1174
`Exhibit A – Joint Claim Construction Chart under P.R. 4-5(d)
`
` U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,275,358 and 9,429,659
`
`Disputed Claim
`Term / Phrase
`indicating consent for obtaining the
`location information of the mobile device.
`
`
`
`MacroPoint’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`Ruiz Foods’
`Proposed Construction
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`4
`
`Page 6 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 7 of 17 PageID #: 1175
`Exhibit A – Joint Claim Construction Chart under P.R. 4-5(d)
`
` U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,275,358 and 9,429,659
`
`Ruiz Foods’
`Proposed Construction
`No construction
`necessary; plain and
`ordinary meaning
`
`
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`MacroPoint’s
`Proposed Construction
`receive one or more
`electrical or optical
`signals, analog or digital
`signals, data, one or more
`computer or processor
`instructions, messages, a
`bit or bit stream, or other
`means that can be
`received, transmitted or
`detected that indicates
`that consent to send
`location information was
`given
`
`Disputed Claim
`Term / Phrase
`’659 Patent, Claim 2:
`A machine or group of machines for monitoring
`location of at least one of a vehicle or freight
`carried by the vehicle, comprising:
`a server comprising a central processing unit, a
`memory, a clock, and a server
`communication transceiver that receives
`location information of a mobile device, the
`mobile device comprising a GPS receiver, a
`microprocessor and a wireless
`communication transceiver coupled to the
`GPS receiver, the mobile device comprising
`the GPS receiver programmed to receive data
`sent by a plurality of GPS satellites, calculate
`location information of the mobile device
`comprising the GPS receiver and transmit the
`location information, the central processing
`unit programmed to:
`receive a request for information regarding the
`location of the vehicle or the freight carried
`by the vehicle;
`request location information of the mobile
`device comprising the GPS receiver from a
`location information provider;
`receive a signal that indicates that consent
`was given to transmission of location
`information;
`receive from the location information provider
`location information of the mobile device
`comprising the GPS receiver, wherein the
`location information of the mobile device
`
`5
`
`Page 7 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 8 of 17 PageID #: 1176
`Exhibit A – Joint Claim Construction Chart under P.R. 4-5(d)
`
` U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,275,358 and 9,429,659
`
`MacroPoint’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`Ruiz Foods’
`Proposed Construction
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`Disputed Claim
`Term / Phrase
`comprising the GPS receiver originated from
`a device other than the mobile device
`comprising the GPS receiver itself; and
`estimate the location of the vehicle or the
`freight carried by the vehicle based at least in
`part on the location information of the
`mobile device comprising the GPS receiver;
`and
`communicate the location of the vehicle or the
`freight carried by the vehicle to cause a
`representation of the location of the vehicle
`or the freight carried by the vehicle.
`
`
`
`6
`
`Page 8 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 9 of 17 PageID #: 1177
`Exhibit A – Joint Claim Construction Chart under P.R. 4-5(d)
`
` U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,275,358 and 9,429,659
`
`Ruiz Foods’
`Proposed Construction
`No construction
`necessary; plain and
`ordinary meaning
`
`
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`MacroPoint’s
`Proposed Construction
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning of “receive a
`sign or piece of
`information that consent
`to sending location
`information has been
`given.”
`
`Disputed Claim
`Term / Phrase
`’659 Patent, Claim 23:
`A machine or group of machines for monitoring
`location of at least one of a vehicle or freight
`carried by the vehicle, the machine or group of
`machines comprising:
`a server comprising a central processing unit, a
`memory, a clock, and a server
`communication transceiver that receives
`location information of a mobile device, the
`mobile device comprising a GPS receiver, a
`microprocessor and a wireless
`communication transceiver coupled to the
`GPS receiver, the mobile device comprising
`the GPS receiver programmed to receive data
`sent by a plurality of GPS satellites, calculate
`location information of the mobile device
`comprising the GPS receiver and transmit the
`location information, the central processing
`unit programmed to:
`receive a request for information regarding the
`location of the vehicle or the freight carried
`by the vehicle, and
`request location information of the vehicle or
`the freight carried by the vehicle from a
`location information provider;
`receive an indication that consent to
`transmission of location information has
`been given; and
`receive location information of the vehicle or
`the freight carried by the vehicle from the
`location information provider;
`
`7
`
`Page 9 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 10 of 17 PageID #: 1178
`Exhibit A – Joint Claim Construction Chart under P.R. 4-5(d)
`
` U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,275,358 and 9,429,659
`
`MacroPoint’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`Ruiz Foods’
`Proposed Construction
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`Disputed Claim
`Term / Phrase
`estimate the location of the vehicle or the
`freight carried by the vehicle from the
`location information received from the
`location information provider;
`communicate the location of the vehicle or the
`freight carried by the vehicle.
`
`
`
`8
`
`Page 10 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 11 of 17 PageID #: 1179
`Exhibit A – Joint Claim Construction Chart under P.R. 4-5(d)
`
` U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,275,358 and 9,429,659
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`Ruiz Foods’
`Proposed Construction
`To the extent the claims
`reciting this limitation
`are not invalid under 35
`U.S.C. § 101, it should
`be construed as follows:
`
`112, ¶ 6; Indefinite
`
`Function: participating in
`and transmitting and
`receiving during a
`telephone call according
`to an undisclosed
`algorithm
`
`Structure: no
`corresponding algorithm,
`structure, material, or
`acts disclosed for
`performing recited
`functions
`
`Disputed Claim
`Term / Phrase
`’358 Patent, Claim 19:
`A system for receiving user consent to obtaining
`location information of a mobile device, the
`system comprising:
`a communications interface configured to
`participate in a telephone call with the mobile
`device;
`a validation logic configured to, within the
`telephone call, identify the mobile device at
`least in part by obtaining an identifier
`associated with the mobile device; and
`a notification logic configured to communicate
`during the telephone call an automated voice
`message including at least one of:
`a notice including information indicating to
`the user of the mobile device that
`consenting to the obtaining of the location
`information of the mobile device would
`result in the location information of the
`mobile device being disclosed, and
`a location at which to find the notice,
`wherein the location at which to find the
`notice is represented by a web address
`corresponding to a website where, during
`the telephone call, the user of the mobile
`device can find the notice including
`information indicating to the user of the
`mobile device that consenting to the
`obtaining of the location information of the
`mobile device would result in the location
`information of the mobile device being
`
`MacroPoint’s
`Proposed Construction
`No construction is
`required.
`
`This claim term is not a
`means-plus-function term
`governed by 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(f). To the extent an
`identification of function
`and corresponding
`structure is required:
`
`Function: participate in a
`telephone call with a
`mobile device
`
`Structure: a card;
`hardware, firmware,
`software or combinations
`of each, a “logic,” a
`software controlled
`microprocessor, discrete
`logic like an application
`specific integrated circuit
`(ASIC), a programmed
`logic device, or a
`memory device
`containing instructions
`
`9
`
`Page 11 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 12 of 17 PageID #: 1180
`Exhibit A – Joint Claim Construction Chart under P.R. 4-5(d)
`
` U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,275,358 and 9,429,659
`
`Disputed Claim
`Term / Phrase
`
`disclosed;
`wherein the communications interface is
`configured to transmit during the telephone
`call the automated voice message to the
`mobile device, and
`wherein the communications interface is
`further configured to, during the telephone
`call, receive from the mobile device data
`indicating the user consent for obtaining the
`location information of the mobile device.
`
`
`
`MacroPoint’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`Ruiz Foods’
`Proposed Construction
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`10
`
`Page 12 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 13 of 17 PageID #: 1181
`Exhibit A – Joint Claim Construction Chart under P.R. 4-5(d)
`
` U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,275,358 and 9,429,659
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`Ruiz Foods’
`Proposed Construction
`To the extent the claims
`reciting this limitation
`are not invalid under 35
`U.S.C. § 101, it should
`be construed as follows:
`
`112, ¶ 6; Indefinite
`
`Function: identifying a
`mobile device according
`to an undisclosed
`algorithm
`
`Structure: no
`corresponding algorithm,
`structure, material, or
`acts disclosed for
`performing recited
`functions
`
`Disputed Claim
`Term / Phrase
`’358 Patent, Claim 19:
`A system for receiving user consent to obtaining
`location information of a mobile device, the
`system comprising:
`a communications interface configured to
`participate in a telephone call with the mobile
`device;
`a validation logic configured to, within the
`telephone call, identify the mobile device at
`least in part by obtaining an identifier
`associated with the mobile device; and
`a notification logic configured to communicate
`during the telephone call an automated voice
`message including at least one of:
`a notice including information indicating to
`the user of the mobile device that
`consenting to the obtaining of the location
`information of the mobile device would
`result in the location information of the
`mobile device being disclosed, and
`a location at which to find the notice,
`wherein the location at which to find the
`notice is represented by a web address
`corresponding to a website where, during
`the telephone call, the user of the mobile
`device can find the notice including
`information indicating to the user of the
`mobile device that consenting to the
`obtaining of the location information of the
`mobile device would result in the location
`information of the mobile device being
`
`MacroPoint’s
`Proposed Construction
`To the extent a
`construction is required,
`this term should be
`construed as “hardware,
`firmware, software or
`combinations of each that
`performs or causes a
`validation action to be
`performed”
`
`This claim term is not a
`means-plus-function term
`governed by 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(f). To the extent an
`identification of function
`and corresponding
`structure is required:
`
`Function: identifying a
`mobile device
`
`Structure: hardware,
`firmware, software or
`combinations of each, a
`“logic,” a software
`controlled
`microprocessor, discrete
`logic like an application
`specific integrated circuit
`(ASIC), a programmed
`logic device, a memory
`
`11
`
`Page 13 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 14 of 17 PageID #: 1182
`Exhibit A – Joint Claim Construction Chart under P.R. 4-5(d)
`
` U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,275,358 and 9,429,659
`
`Disputed Claim
`Term / Phrase
`
`disclosed;
`wherein the communications interface is
`configured to transmit during the telephone
`call the automated voice message to the
`mobile device, and
`wherein the communications interface is
`further configured to, during the telephone
`call, receive from the mobile device data
`indicating the user consent for obtaining the
`location information of the mobile device.
`
`
`
`MacroPoint’s
`Proposed Construction
`device containing
`instructions
`
`Ruiz Foods’
`Proposed Construction
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`12
`
`Page 14 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 15 of 17 PageID #: 1183
`Exhibit A – Joint Claim Construction Chart under P.R. 4-5(d)
`
` U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,275,358 and 9,429,659
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`
`
`Ruiz Foods’
`Proposed Construction
`To the extent the claims
`reciting this limitation
`are not invalid under 35
`U.S.C. § 101, it should
`be construed as follows:
`
`112, ¶ 6; Indefinite
`
`Function: communicating
`an automatic voice
`message during a
`telephone call according
`to an undisclosed
`algorithm
`
`Structure: no
`corresponding algorithm,
`structure, material, or
`acts disclosed for
`performing recited
`functions
`
`Disputed Claim
`Term / Phrase
`’358 Patent, Claim 19:
`A system for receiving user consent to obtaining
`location information of a mobile device, the
`system comprising:
`a communications interface configured to
`participate in a telephone call with the mobile
`device;
`a validation logic configured to, within the
`telephone call, identify the mobile device at
`least in part by obtaining an identifier
`associated with the mobile device; and
`a notification logic configured to
`communicate during the telephone call an
`automated voice message including at least
`one of:
`a notice including information indicating to
`the user of the mobile device that
`consenting to the obtaining of the location
`information of the mobile device would
`result in the location information of the
`mobile device being disclosed, and
`a location at which to find the notice,
`wherein the location at which to find the
`notice is represented by a web address
`corresponding to a website where, during
`the telephone call, the user of the mobile
`device can find the notice including
`information indicating to the user of the
`mobile device that consenting to the
`obtaining of the location information of the
`mobile device would result in the location
`
`MacroPoint’s
`Proposed Construction
`To the extent a
`construction is required,
`this term should be
`construed as “hardware,
`firmware, software or
`combinations of each that
`performs or causes a
`notification action to be
`performed”
`
`This claim term is not a
`means-plus-function term
`governed by 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(f). To the extent an
`identification of function
`and corresponding
`structure is required:
`
`Function: communicating
`information
`
`Structure: hardware,
`firmware, software or
`combinations of each, a
`“logic,” a software
`controlled
`microprocessor, discrete
`logic like an application
`specific integrated circuit
`(ASIC), a programmed
`logic device, a memory
`
`13
`
`Page 15 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 16 of 17 PageID #: 1184
`Exhibit A – Joint Claim Construction Chart under P.R. 4-5(d)
`
` U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,275,358 and 9,429,659
`
`MacroPoint’s
`Proposed Construction
`device containing
`instructions
`
`Ruiz Foods’
`Proposed Construction
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`Disputed Claim
`Term / Phrase
`information of the mobile device being
`disclosed;
`wherein the communications interface is
`configured to transmit during the telephone
`call the automated voice message to the
`mobile device, and
`wherein the communications interface is
`further configured to, during the telephone
`call, receive from the mobile device data
`indicating the user consent for obtaining the
`location information of the mobile device.
`
`
`
`14
`
`Page 16 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

`

`Case 6:16-cv-01133-RWS-KNM Document 63 Filed 09/14/17 Page 17 of 17 PageID #: 1185
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service
`
` I
`
`are being served with a copy of the foregoing Joint Claim Construction Chart through the
`
`Court’s CM/ECF system in accordance with Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on September 14, 2017, and
`
`that a copy of the Joint Claim Construction Chart (including Exhibit A thereto) in Word format
`
`is being provided on computer disk to the Court.
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`/s/ James T. Fisher
`James T. Fisher
`
`An Attorney for Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 17 of 17
`
`RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
`Exhibit 1021
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket