throbber

`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`––––––––––
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`––––––––––
`
`FITBIT, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BLACKBIRD TECH LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`––––––––––
`
`Case IPR2017-02012
`Patent 6,434,212
`
`––––––––––
`
`PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR DISTRICT COURT-TYPE
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b)
`
`

`

`
`
`I.
`
`Statement of Precise Relief Requested
`
`Petitioner Fitbit, Inc. (“Fitbit”) respectfully requests that the Board apply a
`
`district court-type claim construction in this proceeding because U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,434,212 (“the ’212 Patent”) will likely expire before the Board issues a final
`
`written decision. The Board should grant this motion because it is unopposed and
`
`it complies with the requirements set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b).
`
`II.
`
`Fitbit’s Certification Required by 37 C.F.R. §42.100(b)
`
`Fitbit hereby certifies that U.S. Patent No. 6,434,212 will expire within 18
`
`months from the entry of the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition because
`
`the ’212 Patent expires on October 28, 2018 and the Notice of Filing Date
`
`Accorded to the Petition was mailed on September 14, 2017. See Paper No. 3.
`
`III. Statement of Reasons for Relief Requested
`A. Legal Standard
`“The claim construction standard to be applied during [an] inter partes
`
`review[] depends upon whether the patent is expired or unexpired.” Samsung
`
`Elecs. Co. v. Elm 3DS Innovations, LLC, Case No. IPR2016-00386, slip op. at 2
`
`(PTAB Aug. 11, 2016) (Paper 28). “[W]hen a patent expires during an inter
`
`partes review, the Board has applied the district court-type construction.” Id. at 3
`
`(emphasis in original) (citations omitted). A request for the Board to apply a
`
`district court-type claim construction must be made in the form of a motion filed
`
`within thirty days of the filing of the petition. 37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b). The motion
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`must include a party’s certification that “the involved patent will expire within 18
`
`months from the entry of the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition.” Id.
`
`Petitioner’s Motion is Timely and Authorized
`
`B.
`This Motion for a District Court-Type Claim Construction is timely because
`
`it is being filed less than thirty days after the petition for inter partes review was
`
`filed on August 29, 2017. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b). The Board authorized the
`
`filing of this motion on September 25, 2017.
`
`C. A District Court-Type Claim Construction is Appropriate
`Because the ’212 Patent’s parent application was filed on October 28, 1998,
`
`the ’212 Patent will expire on October 28, 2018. See 35 U.S.C. § 154(a)(2). Fitbit
`
`filed its petition for inter partes review on August 29, 2017. Thus, the ’212 Patent
`
`will expire approximately 14 months after the filing date of Fitbit’s petition. It is
`
`unlikely that the Board will issue a final determination prior to the ’212 Patent’s
`
`expiration, given that the proceedings could take 18 months. Therefore, it is
`
`appropriate for the Board to apply a district court-type claim construction. See
`
`Samsung Elecs. Co. at 3 (“[W]hen a patent expires during an inter partes review,
`
`the Board has applied the district court-type construction.”). The Patent Owner
`
`does not oppose this motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`Dated: September 27, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`/Harper Batts/
`
`Harper Batts
`Reg. No. 56,160
`1001 Page Mill Road
`Building One, Suite 200
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Phone: (650) 739-7500
`Facsimile: (650) 739-7699
`harper.batts@bakerbotts.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER
`FITBIT, INC.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on September 27, 2017, a true and
`
`correct copy of the foregoing motion was served via electronic mail to:
`
`
`
`
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner:
`
`Walter D. Davis, Jr. (Reg. No. 45,137)
` Email: wdavis@dbjg.com
`Wayne M. Helge (Reg. No. 56,905)
` Email: whelge@dbjg.com
`Aldo Noto (Reg. No. 35,628)
` Email: anoto@dbjg.com
`Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey, LLP
`8300 Greensboro Dr.
`Suite 500
`McLean, VA 22102
`Phone: (571)765-7700
`Fax: (571)765-7200
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 27, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`/Harper Batts/
`Harper Batts
`Reg. No. 56,160
`Attorney for Petitioner Fitbit, Inc.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket