throbber

`
`
`APPLIED
`
`PHYSICS .
`
`
`
`
`
`NUMBER 1
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`995051"!
`
`
`VOLUMEII
`
`
`
`main.
`
`ti:
`wlu
`
`Md
`TIP
`“1)
`SKID" \.
`
`'uhl‘
`\ Tum-
`m"
`mull
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TCL 1025, Page 1
`’FC141025,Page1
`
`

`

`Volume 11, Number 2
`
`APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
`
`15 July 1967
`
`mately 2. Experimentally we have found that R
`has the value of unity or slightly greater, within a
`maximum experimental error of ±O.2. There is no
`significant variation in this value between focused
`and unfocused input beams, so spatial non-overlap
`cannot be a factor. Pulse envelope traces (Tektronix
`519 oscilloscope) of the laser output show regular
`modulation indicating some locking of the multi(cid:173)
`modes. While this would increase the efficiency of
`S.H.G.p it would require for the mixing process
`a more critical synchronization of the resulting
`modulation of the two fundamental frequencies.
`Streak interferograms (2 nsec resolution) show that
`such complete synchronization does not exist.
`After this work had been completed, the mixing
`of ruby and neodymium Q-switched lasers operat(cid:173)
`ing in a common resonator to produce a summed
`output at 4192 A was reported13 but the relative
`efficiencies of S.H.G. and sum generation were not
`compared.
`
`I M. Bass, P. A. Franken, A. E. Hill, C. W. Peters, and G. Wein-
`reich,Phys. Rev. Letters 8,18 (1962).
`2 R. C. Miller and A. Savage, Phys. Rev. 128, 2175 (1962).
`aN. 1. Adams and P. B. Schoefer, Proc. IEEE 51, 1366 (1963).
`4 D. H. McMahon and A. R. Franklin, I Appl. Phys. 36, 2073
`(1965).
`'D. H. McMahon and A. R. Franklin,I Appl. Phys. 36, 2807
`(1965).
`6 A. W. Smith and N. Braslau, IBM I of Res. and Dev. 6, 361
`(1962).
`7 M. D. Martin, E. L. Thomas, and J. K. Wright, Phys. Letters
`15,136 (1965).
`8R. Madhavan, M. K. Dheer, and J. S. Jaseja, Appl. Opt. 5,
`1823 (1966).
`9D. J. Bradley, G. Magyar, and M. C. Richardson, Proc. VII
`Int. Conf. on Ion. Phen. in Gases, Belgrade (1965), in press.
`IOD. J. Bradley, G. Magyar, and M. C. Richardson, to be pub(cid:173)
`lished.
`II N. Bloembergen, Nonlinear Optics 133, (Benjamin, New York,
`1965), p. 133.
`12R. L. Kohn and R. H. Pantell, Appl. Phys. Letters 8, 231 (1966).
`l3yU. A. Gol'din, V. G. Dmitriev, V. K. Tarasov, and N. V.
`Shkunov,jETP Letters 4, 297 (1966).
`
`A NEW PHOSPHOR FOR FLYING-SPOT CATHODE-RAY TUBES FOR
`COLOR TELEVISION: YELLOW-EMITTING Y3Als012-Ce3+
`
`The fluorescence of YaAlsO I2-Ce3+ under cathode-ray excitation consists of an emission band peaking at 550 nm.
`The decay time is 0.07 -0.08 fJ.sec. In view of these properties this phosphor is very suitable for flying-spot cathode(cid:173)
`ray tubes for color television.
`
`C. Blasse and A. Brit
`Philips Research Laboratories
`N. V. Philips' GloeiIampenfabrieken
`Eindhoven, The Netherlands
`(Received 29 May 1967)
`
`Ce3+ -activated phosphors are usually char(cid:173)
`acterized by an emission band with a maximum in
`or near the uv region and a very short decay time.1
`In this Letter we report on a Ce3+ -activated phos(cid:173)
`phor with an emission at considerably longer Wave(cid:173)
`lengths, viz. Y3AIs012-Ce.
`Samples with the general formula Y 3-xCexAls012
`(x < 0.3) were prepared by firing intimate mix(cid:173)
`tures of high-purity Y 203, hydrated alumina and
`Ce20 3 at 1500° in nitrogen. X-ray analysis showed
`them to be pure garnets. According to chemical
`analysis the CeH content of the samples is neg(cid:173)
`ligible. This was also the case if the samples were
`fired in oxygen, air, or nitrogen containing 5%
`of hydrogen. Optical measurements were per(cid:173)
`formed as described previously. 2
`Y 3AIsOlcCe shows a bright yellow emission
`
`under excitation with cathode rays as well as with
`blue radiation. Figure 1 shows the spectral energy
`
`Fig. 1. Spectral energy distribution of Y '.94Ceo.08~0I2
`under cathode ray excitation (full line), uv excitation (broken
`line) and of Y •. 94Ceo.08AI.Gaa0I2 under uv excitation (dotted
`line). The solid and broken lines coincide in the visible region.
`
`53
`TCL 1025, Page 2
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms at: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. Download to IP: 198.65.204.101 On: Mon,
`14 Nov 2016 15:02:16
`
`

`

`Volume 11, Number 2
`
`APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
`
`15 July 1967
`
`distribution of the emission of Y3AIsO I2-Ce under
`cathode-ray (cr) as well as under ultraviolet (uv)
`excitation. Figure 2 shows the excitation spectrum
`of the visible fluorescence of Y3AIsOI2-Ce and the
`diffuse reflection spectra of Y3AIsOI2-Ce and un(cid:173)
`activated Y 3AIsOI2' The radiant efficiency for cr
`excitation (20 keY) is 3.5% for the emission in the
`visible region and 0.1 % for the emission in the uv
`region.3 These figures were found for a sample
`with composition Y2.94Ceo.06AIsOI2 and vary only
`slightly with the Ce concentration. At very low Ce
`concentration the ratio of the intensities of uv to
`visible emission increases.
`Decay times were measured with cr and uv exci(cid:173)
`tation. With cr excitation the phosphor was irradi(cid:173)
`ated with short electron beam pulses (duration 0.1
`JLsec, repetition rate 104 cps} in a demountable tube.
`The fluorescence was collected on a photomultiplier
`and displayed on an oscilloscope. The decay time
`was found to be shorter than 0.1 JLsec. The phos(cid:173)
`phor was also excited by a short pulse of uv radia(cid:173)
`tion with the aid of a TRW nanosecond spectral
`source system (duration 0.004 JLsec, repetition rate
`5 X 103 cps). The output was again displayed on an
`oscilloscope. The decay time proved to be 0.07-
`0.08 JLsec.
`All Ce3+ -activated phosphors described in the
`literature show the maximum of their emission in
`the uv or blue (up to =410 nm). The emission from
`Y3AIsOI2-Ce under cr excitation, however, lies
`almost entirely in the visible with a broad band
`peaking at 550 nm. There is also a uv emission
`band under short-wave uv excitation. In view of
`this peculiar behavior it may be wondered whether
`this emission is really due to the Ce3+ center. There
`are several reasons for believing that this is the
`case:
`(a) Chemical analysis excludes other oxidation
`states of cerium; (b) unactivated Y3AIsOl2 does not
`
`fOO~----------------~~------~(W
`
`-------------------------------'-
`
`I
`Iso
`j
`t
`
`Fig. 2. Relative excitation spectrum of the visible ftuores-
`cence of Y .... Ceo.oaAIsOI2 (solid line) and dift1ue reftection
`spectra of Y2 ... Ceo.oaAIsO'2 (broken line) and Y,A1s0 12 (dot-
`ted line).
`
`54
`
`emit in this region; (c) the decay time of Ce3+ phos(cid:173)
`phors is always very short, viz. shorter than 0.1
`JLsec, since an allowed transition is involved en ~
`2F). Y3AIsOI2-Ce has such a short decay time; (d)
`the emission band of Ce3+ phosphors should con(cid:173)
`sist of two bands, the ground state being split
`eF7I2 , 2Fsd. The energy difference between these
`two bands is some 2000 cm-I. Particularly at higher
`Ce concentrations this splitting is not always ob(cid:173)
`served. The uv emission band ofY3AlsOl2-Ce does
`two peaks (29.800 and 27.800
`indeed exhibit
`cm-I) but the visible band does not. Y3A12Ga3012-Ce
`with similar but less efficient fluorescence, however,
`shows an indication of the splitting of this emission
`band in the visible.
`Figure 2 shows that Y3AIsOI2-Ce is most effi(cid:173)
`ciently excited by 460 nm radiation. The efficiency
`for long-wave uv excitation is less, and that for
`short-wave uv excitation may even be termed low.
`The excitation bands correspond to absorption in
`the Ce3+ center. This follows from a comparison
`between the diffuse reflection spectra of Y3AIsOl2
`and Y3AIsOI2-Ce. These bands show the complete
`crystal field splitting of the 2n level of Ce3+.
`Elsewhere we will discuss this and other Ce3+
`phosphors more extensively. For the moment we
`conclude that Y3AIsOI2-Ce3+
`is an exceptional
`Ce3+ phosphor with an emission at relatively long
`wavelengths and a high efficiency under cr exci(cid:173)
`tation.
`Therefore this phosphor can be of use for flying(cid:173)
`spot cathode-ray tubes, especially for color tele(cid:173)
`vision. When the screen of such a tube is scanned
`with a normal television raster, a decay time of
`the phosphor shorter than =0.1 JLsec is required.
`Usually ZnO-Zn is used with an emission band at
`500 nm containing only a small amount of red and
`with an efficiency which is about the same as that
`of Ce3+ -activated phosphors. Its decay time, how(cid:173)
`ever, is too long, viz. = 1 JLsec. Therefore a large
`correction is applied to the output signal by elec(cid:173)
`trical compensation with unavoidably a great re(cid:173)
`duction in this signal. YaAIsO I2-Ce has a much
`higher output in the red region and, moreover, a
`much shorter decay time. Therefore the output
`signal of this tube is expected to be an order of
`magnitude higher than for ZnO- Zn. The emission
`of YaAIsOI2-Ce does not contain blue. However,
`efficient blue phosphors with short decay time are
`available (for example, Ca2AI2Si07-Ce (ref. 1), so
`that a mixture of these two phosphors will suffice.
`
`'See, e.g., A. Bril and H. A. Klasens, Philips Res. Repts. 7,421
`(1952).
`
`TCL 1025, Page 3
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms at: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. Download to IP: 198.65.204.101 On: Mon,
`14 Nov 2016 15:02:16
`
`

`

`Volume 11, Number 2
`
`APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
`
`15 July 1967
`
`2A. Bril and W. L. Wanmaker,J. Electrochem. Soc. 111,1363
`(1964).
`
`3For comparison: the most efficient Ce3+-activated phosphor
`C~AI2Si07 has an efficiency of 4% (ref. 1).
`
`HIGH TEMPERATURE RESONANCE LOSSES IN SILICON-DOPED
`YTTRIUM-IRON GARNET (YIG)*
`
`D. J. Epsteint
`Electric Power Engineering Department
`Technical University of Denmark
`Lyngby, Denmark
`L. Tocci
`Department of Electrical Engineering and
`Center for Materials Science and Engineering
`Massachusetts Institute of Technology
`Cambridge, Massachusetts
`(Received 27 March 1967; in final form 31 May 1967)
`
`The ferrimagnetic resonance linewidth of silicon-doped YIG, measured as a function of temperature at 13.4
`kMHz, is found to show a pronounced peak at 105°C. The anisotropic behavior of this peak is in good agreement
`with the four-level valence-exchange model proposed by Clogston. The model yields for the electron ordering
`energy a value 5 X 10-4 eV which agrees closely with the energy deduced from magnetic anneal studies. The acti(cid:173)
`vation energy for electron transfer (0.25 eV) is virtually identical with values reported in investigations of electrical
`conductivity and acoustic loss.
`
`It is known that the introduction of small con(cid:173)
`centrations of silicon into the YIG lattice leads to a
`significant increase in magnetic loss. There is gen(cid:173)
`eral agreement, however, that silicon itself plays
`only an incidental role and that the losses are actu(cid:173)
`ally due to the presence of divalent iron created in
`response to the addition of quadrivalent silicon.
`In YIG samples containing Fe2+ two peaks have
`been reported in the plot of microwave resonance
`Iinewidth vs temperature. Typically, one peak oc(cid:173)
`curs at low temperature below ca. 100oK, and the
`other above ca. 300°K. It was suggested, at the time
`of its discovery, that the low temperature peak was
`due to valence exchange!,2 i.e., electron transfer
`between Fe2+ and Fe3+ cations. More recently,
`Tchernev3 has. argued that the electron-hopping
`mechanism is, in all likelihood, "frozen out" at
`tern peratures below 100oK, and therefore, it is more
`reasonable to ascribe the peak to the localized Fe2+
`ion acting, more or less,4 as a slow relaxer. The
`high temperature peak has been looked at to a
`
`*The experimental work was performed under contract with
`the Air Force Materials Laboratory, Research and Technology
`Division, Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson Air
`Force Base, Ohio.
`t Presently on leave of absence from the Department of Elec(cid:173)
`trical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cam(cid:173)
`bridge, Massachusetts.
`
`lesser extentS,7 and the suggestion has been made
`that it is due to valence exchange. 7
`In our work the temperature dependence and
`anisotropy of the upper peak have been examined
`in some detail. Our results provide strong evidence
`that the high temperature resonance losses are,
`indeed, due to valence exchange, a conclusion that
`would seem to exclude this mechanism as the one
`also responsible for the low temperature peak.
`We have measured the linewidth of the uniform
`precession at 13.4 kMHz for several single crystals
`of silicon-doped YIG (YaFes-IlSiIl012) between room
`temperature and the Curie point. The crystals were
`grown from a PbO-PbF2 flux using high purity
`starting materials to which controlled amounts of
`Si02 were added. Silicon concentration was de(cid:173)
`termined from spectrographic analysis of several
`crystals (not the actual samples) selected from the
`growth run. Measurements were made on samples
`prepared as well polished spheres, 0.025" in diam(cid:173)
`eter. These were mounted in a TE-l 08 transmission
`cavity and linewidth measurements were made
`using the half-power method. 8
`Our results for the composition 6 = 0.06 are
`shown in Fig. 1. A sample containing a smaller
`silicon content (6 = 0.04) showed the same tempera(cid:173)
`ture dependence but with the magnitude of the
`losses reduced roughly in proportion to the doping.
`
`55
`TCL 1025, Page 4
`
` Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms at: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. Download to IP: 198.65.204.101 On: Mon,
`14 Nov 2016 15:02:16
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket